Intermediate cartridges for counter-UAV combat

7 172 32
Intermediate cartridges for counter-UAV combat
A combat vehicle of the Russian Army's mobile counter-UAV team. A battery of automatic rifles serves as one of the weapons. Photo: Russian Ministry of Defense


Various means are used to combat light unmanned aerial vehicles, including small arms. weapon of various classes and types. This has led to the development of specialized cartridges optimized for engaging UAVs. In particular, intermediate ammunition is being developed that is compatible with standard military weapons and has the necessary combat capabilities.



Theory and practice


Small and light UAVs pose a known threat to active forces. They can be used by adversaries to conduct reconnaissance for strike forces or to carry out direct attacks. Recent conflicts have confirmed the effectiveness of UAVs and exposed the lack of defenses against them.

Typical modern copters used for reconnaissance or as payload carriers are not known for their durability and survivability. Any projectile can cause critical damage to a vital structural element and disable the UAV. At the same time, such Drones They have fairly high speed and maneuverability, which makes it difficult to fire effectively at them.

In practice, smoothbore shotguns loaded with buckshot or buckshot have proven to be the most effective against UAVs. Buckshot is guaranteed to disable a target upon impact, and the presence of multiple buckshot pellets in a single round increases the likelihood of a successful hit.


5,45 x 39 mm shotgun shells from Tekhkrim. Finished cartridges and cartridges with projectiles are shown. Photo courtesy of Tekhkrim.

Additionally, UAVs are fired upon using the standard assault rifles and machine guns available to units. In this case, the probability of hitting a target increases due to burst fire and the density of fire. The downside is increased ammunition consumption. The upside is that there's no need to carry additional weapons.

The solution is to combine both methods in a single round. Various variants of cartridges for assault rifles and rifles with multiple submunitions are being developed in Russia and abroad. Such ammunition should provide superior combat performance and simplify the process of arming units.

In the early stages, the development of intermediate anti-UAV rounds was largely amateurish, which imposed certain limitations. However, defense industry companies subsequently took up the task, and the first prototypes have already entered serial production.

Russian development


The first domestically produced specialized ammunition appeared in 2023–24, when the threat posed by light UAVs became widespread. Initially, these were the work of local enthusiasts. They used readily available components and were able to produce quite successful ammunition.

The first anti-UAV rounds had a fairly simple and technologically advanced design. They were converted from standard ammunition by replacing the standard bullet with a unique one. Several pellets of the appropriate diameter served as projectiles. They were placed in heat-shrink tubing, which fused them together to form a bullet. This "ammunition" was then inserted into a 5,45 x 39 mm cartridge case.


Multi-bullet cartridges from the Kalashnikov. Photo: Kalashnikov Concern

It worked, but not without problems. The polymer tube didn't always break properly, and the pellets were distributed unevenly.

In 2024-25, Tekhkrim, a company renowned for its developments in ammunition, unveiled its version of the 5,45 x 39 mm shotgun cartridge. The new product received the necessary certificates and approvals, including for use with civilian weapons.

The 5,45mm shotgun cartridge from Tekhkrim retains the casing of the standard ammunition. Instead of a bullet, it uses a special steel container containing seven pellets with a diameter of 4,5mm. The total projectile weight ranges from 4,5 to 5,5g. The muzzle velocity of this "bullet" is at least 700 m/s.

After exiting the weapon's barrel, the container opens and releases the projectiles. They continue their flight until they impact with their target. The ammunition's energy parameters are sufficient to engage typical aerial targets at ranges of up to tens of meters. The cartridge also allows for burst fire.

It was recently revealed that the Kalashnikov Concern is developing its own version of the 5,45mm anti-UAV cartridge. This round is reportedly designed with a multiple-bullet design, but technical details are being withheld. Externally, the cartridge is identical to a standard cartridge with a conventional bullet.


A magazine of American-designed 5,56 x 45mm ammunition. Photo by Drone Round Defense.

The 5,45 x 39 mm multi-bullet cartridge has reportedly passed tests and confirmed its expected performance. When firing single shots and in bursts, the AK-12 assault rifle with this ammunition reliably engaged hovering and moving drones, including those simulating a drone attack. The projectiles damaged key components of the UAV, disabling them.

Kalashnikov is currently refining the design and preparing the next stage of testing. At the same time, they are considering launching serial production.

Ukrainian experience


Ukrainian forces also experimented with redesigning standard cartridges. They used established solutions involving multiple pellets and an improvised holding device.

An industrial solution was later developed. In 2024-25, several Ukrainian organizations and enterprises developed the "Goroshok" series of cartridges. It includes intermediate 5,45 x 39 mm and 5,56 x 45 mm ammunition—both Soviet and NATO standards. The propellant used is as similar as possible.

Instead of a bullet, the "Goroshok" is equipped with a container containing several brass balls and a lead core. After firing, these projectiles are released and disperse within a cone. The effective range is stated to be 30-70 meters. Brass pellets are claimed to be superior to lead pellets in terms of penetration and target impact.


A lightweight quadcopter after being hit by shrapnel. Photo by Drone Round Defense.

According to available information, both versions of the "Goroshok" projectile have passed testing and entered serial production. Ammunition is already being delivered to the front. The stated specifications have not yet been independently verified.

American Prospects


The US Army hasn't yet encountered large-scale attacks from light UAVs, so interest in such cartridges is still low. Furthermore, combat units aren't experimenting with re-equipping standard cartridges—that's the work of amateur enthusiasts and commercial organizations.

In January 2026, Drone Round Defense (Gilbert, Arizona) presented its own development of this type. They created their own version of a bullet-shaped container with submunitions that can be modified to accommodate cartridges of various sizes. 5,56 x 45 mm and 7,62 x 51 mm ammunition have already been introduced, and a 6,8 x 51 mm version is also being developed.

Regardless of caliber, bullet designs are similar. A common shell-container holds either eight smaller, heavier pellets or five larger ones. The bullet and cartridge with a larger number of projectiles are designated by the letter "K." The second variant is designated by the letter "L."

The 5,56mm and 7,62mm cartridges of the new family are claimed to be compatible with any weapon of the corresponding calibers. They can be fed from a magazine or belt, and fire single or burst fire. Bullets can pass through various muzzle devices, including suppressors. The effective range of the K-variant is limited to 50 meters, while for the "L"-type cartridges it is 100 meters.


Targets demonstrating the results of shooting with the Drone Round Defense shotgun shell. Photo by Thefirearmblog.com

Drone Round Defense conducted factory testing of the ammunition and submitted a request to the Pentagon. Recently, test firings involving military personnel took place at a US Army range. The soldiers quickly mastered the new ammunition and successfully engaged a training aerial target. If the Army confirms the results, the company will receive a production contract.

Tasks and solutions


Several countries are simultaneously working on the development of an intermediate anti-UAV round. The first such developments have already been unveiled, and some prototypes have entered series production. Other rounds are undergoing testing and demonstrating their potential.

Given current trends, it's expected that work in this area will continue. This will provide riflemen in various armies armed with assault rifles or machine guns with new special-purpose ammunition. Similar cartridges in other calibers for sniper rifles and machine guns may also become available.

During current and future conflicts, such ammunition and cartridge lines will undergo thorough testing. They will also be compared with existing solutions, such as shotguns with pellets or buckshot. If their advantages are confirmed, the concept will be widely adopted.
32 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. KCA
    +3
    April 14 2026 04: 19
    What a pain in the ass, a motorized rifle squad includes a sniper and a grenade launcher? Well, just add a specially trained anti-drone soldier with an automatic/semi-automatic shotgun, and there's no need to invent anything. For example, a Saiga-12 with 8 rounds, buckshot, and 5-round magazines will suffice, not to mention a 000.
    1. +3
      April 14 2026 07: 37
      Quote: KCA
      This is a real pain in the ass,

      According to unsubstantiated reports online, the main losses were caused by UAVs. What good is a dead sniper and grenade launcher?
      Quote: KCA
      Well, bring in a fighter to fight UAVs, with a shotgun, automatic/semi-automatic,

      On the nasty internet they also write that the soldiers carry both an AK and a shotgun.
      1. +1
        April 14 2026 07: 42
        Quote: Civil
        Because the main losses are from UAVs. What good is a dead sniper or grenade launcher?

        What's the point of a three-man assault team? You have to watch for mines, the sky, and the enemy. And you can't assemble a platoon; artillery will hit you instantly. We still haven't overcome the Ukrainian Armed Forces in counter-battery fire. If only we had drones, then a platoon's fire against a drone is much more effective than a single gunner.
      2. KCA
        0
        April 14 2026 07: 47
        So I'm writing that we need to introduce a regular unit specifically for combating drones, train them, arm them accordingly, and not invent a 5.45 or 7.62 cartridge with shot in a rifled barrel.
        1. 0
          April 14 2026 08: 41
          Yes, we need to recruit all kinds of specialists. The more, the better. We also need a specialist in opening cans and cartridge boxes...
          1. +3
            April 14 2026 09: 04
            You forgot to mention that you also need a special specialist to carry these zinc and canned goods... bully
          2. KCA
            0
            April 14 2026 09: 17
            Of course not. What the hell do you need a sniper for? Any soldier can easily perform a full-length targeting exercise at 400m with an SVD, and hitting a tank with an RPG is a total no-brainer. Disperse the training centers that train specialists, otherwise they train some kind of crap—communications specialists, air defense specialists, and anyone can fly like a hedgehog in a plane if you give it a good kick.
  2. 0
    April 14 2026 05: 00
    The term "gross sample" grates on my ear. I checked the internet and it only says "gross product," but that's a completely different field. Maybe it's a serial sample, mass production.
    In general, anti-drone defense requires a variety of combinations and techniques. It should be tailored to each soldier, but it should ensure that the standard weapon remains usable for its intended purpose—killing manpower as a close-combat weapon—and not be used when dueling infantry and finding yourself loaded with anti-drone buckshot. Therefore, a weapon-mounted attachment is most likely needed, such as a buckshot launcher, underbarrel grenade launcher, flare gun, etc., loaded specifically for counter-drone use. The possibility of duels with ground-based self-propelled drones should also be considered, for which an underbarrel flare launcher (grenade launcher) is preferable. And yes, a dedicated unit is needed within a group of soldiers to protect them from air strikes by all types of drones. It is armed not only with special weapons but also with specialized equipment for electronic jamming and detection. It is believed that such vehicles will be priority targets for enemy snipers.
    1. +3
      April 14 2026 08: 40
      Quote: Umptek
      The term "gross sample" grates on the ear.

      There's a term for it: "bulk cartridge." This is in contrast to armor-piercing, PBZT, tracer, and especially sniper rounds of the same caliber. So, in that sense, it's fine.
  3. +3
    April 14 2026 05: 13
    A battery of automatic guns is crap! A quadruple Maxim is better. In my opinion, the ZU-23/2 and Shilka should be automated and combined into blocks. When an air target appears, the nearest guns home in on the target, and at least six guns fire in unison to eliminate it. The Zushka (Shaitan Arba) should also be automated; the dushmans were terrified of it in Afghanistan. And it wouldn't be a bad idea to use the Gryazev-Shipunov systems.
  4. +2
    April 14 2026 05: 27
    In practice, smoothbore guns with shot or buckshot have proven to be the most effective against UAVs.

    Why aren't 30mm canister rounds used? They can be used with automatic fire. Programmable rounds are expensive and can only be used with precise target range recognition, which limits the rate of fire. High accuracy with automated aiming is also required. Canister shot can be fired like a hunting rifle, but with larger calibers, the effective range is much greater than that of a hunting rifle. For a 100mm can be as far as half a kilometer, i.e., the visual target recognition range.
  5. Owl
    +1
    April 14 2026 09: 04
    When moving out to perform a mission or moving in the "death zone" (up to 30-50 km from the LBS), a soldier must have ammunition for his standard weapon optimized for destroying UAVs and also have strong nerves in order to conduct rapid aimed fire to destroy the drone before approaching it to a distance of 5-3 meters.
    1. 0
      April 14 2026 14: 23
      When moving out to perform a mission or moving in the "death zone" (up to 30-50 km from the LBS), a soldier must have ammunition for his standard weapon optimized for destroying UAVs and also have strong nerves in order to conduct rapid aimed fire to destroy the drone before approaching it to a distance of 5-3 meters.

      The weapon is standard issue! Rotate the ammo in the magazine. And generally, 5-6 meters is a sufficient range for trench combat.
  6. +2
    April 14 2026 09: 29
    They were placed in heat shrink tubing.

    If you don't mind the barrel, that's fine. Plastic in a rifled barrel is a surefire way to ruin it quickly. Not to mention the hassle of cleaning it afterwards.
    1. 0
      April 14 2026 18: 39
      Quote: paul3390
      Not to mention how to clean it later.

      They clean with a bullet... After 4-5 "buckshot" rounds, the fifth or sixth is a regular one! Other "variations" are possible...
      1. 0
        April 14 2026 19: 26
        Unfortunately, no. Everything won't be cleaned, as bitter experience has proven.
        1. 0
          April 14 2026 23: 43
          Quote: paul3390
          Not everything will be cleaned, as proven by bitter experience.

          I won't argue... I haven't checked! hi But I've heard from fighters that they do it this way... Besides, either the DPR or LPR have set up production of "buckshot" cartridges in plastic containers, similar to the Tekhkrim cartridges in steel containers... They say those containers don't foul the barrels the way heat-shrink tubing does! Besides, you could probably use captured weapons (it's no shame to ruin them!); and save your own for "reporting"! Of course, that's where it's most convenient... for artillerymen, for example!
  7. -2
    April 14 2026 14: 16
    In the autumn, everyone has seen how maple seeds, like helicopters, slowly circling, descend from the sky.
    What if the helicopters were plastic and bigger than maple ones, and they were fired off like scattered fireworks from anti-aircraft guns over swarms of birds?

    "Not every bird will fly to the middle of the Dnieper" am
  8. 0
    April 14 2026 14: 49
    The whole article is about nothing.
    Sure, shotgun shells are great, but they shouldn't be the primary solution to the infantry drone problem.
    The only solution that is possible at the moment:
    1. Universal equipping of infantry with drone detectors
    2. infantry electronic warfare devices.
  9. 0
    April 14 2026 15: 28
    I don't understand why steel balls can't be used as shot?
    If they are stored in a soft metal container, the barrel will not suffer, and penetration will increase. Surely, a way to mass-produce them, while reducing the precision requirements, can be found in ball bearing manufacturing.
    1. +1
      7 May 2026 12: 21
      I don't understand why steel balls can't be used as shot?

      Свинец лучше. Свинцовая дробь тяжелее и при той же начальной скорости имеет бОльшую энергию, летит дальше. А для бОльшей твёрдости, дробь делается из сплава свинца с сурьмой и этого вполне хватает.
      1. 0
        7 May 2026 19: 16
        Про сплав знаю, просто подумалось, что железо дешевле, а дальность там уже не так важна.
  10. 0
    April 14 2026 15: 31
    It's impossible to evaluate weapons without understanding the design of enemy UAVs. One thing is clear: each type of UAV requires an appropriate tool. A more or less universal solution might be a lightweight ATGM-like weapon with the appropriate software and controls.
    To reduce costs - a remotely controlled reusable kinetic interceptor.

    The models shown in the photo are basically unusable in the rear. And even at the front, it won't protect anyone except itself and a fifty-meter radius around it.
  11. +1
    April 14 2026 16: 14
    So, I read the article and the comments. I'll add my perspective: first, regarding the special forces drone in a squad—on defense, maybe in the trenches, but on the offensive, 2-4 men go at a time, where everyone essentially has to protect themselves from everything. The philosophy here should be similar to aviation. When the first radars appeared, dedicated aircraft were used to scatter chaff—covering them with passive jamming. When SAMs appeared, dedicated EW providers appeared, and later, suppression fire teams, but they operated during large-scale air strikes, covering strike teams... clearing their path. And when the strike teams entered the target area, they could be thwarted by short-range SAMs or MANPADS. Ultimately, through evolution, it was determined that each aircraft needed an individual EW suite, while jammers and SAM suppressors were for the group. So here too, we need individual electronic warfare equipment for each soldier, and autonomous ones at that. Plus, counter-drone weapons for each—either magazines with such ammunition or an additional smoothbore. Besides that, interceptor drones for cover and a group mobile electronic warfare system based on the NRTK. Automatic anti-drone turrets can be installed on the unfit. ZU-23s and modernized Shilkas are for covering the deep rear—they don't need as much mobility and the targets are larger. And installing ZUs with autonomous sights on the front lines, so that they can engage a single target in a battery, is absurd. They'll be spotted from the air, trigger an artillery strike, or 10 FPVs, which will destroy them in an instant. Today, even good platform mobility is no protection against defeat. If even the enemy's patrol missed the arrival of a self-propelled gun or multiple rocket launcher (MLRS), they will give themselves away with a salvo, and as they retreat, reconnaissance UAVs and strike aircraft will follow them, immobilizing them, and artillery or other UAVs will finish them off.
    Essentially, the 4-man assault tactic requires two of them to defend the post from FPV and airdrop attacks, while the other two advance to the attack line and then cover each other. Considering that if they cluster together (it's easier to fend off drones), artillery will hit them, and if they spread out, I'll likely pick off the drones one by one. For the pig-faced, the drone has become the foundation of defensive stability... it's a guided bullet... there are a lot of them now... there's no effective defense against them... if they're hit, only the drone operator is lost, intact and leaving a trail of FPVs. Essentially, an infantryman must fight dozens of drones until he reaches the trench line... man versus robot. And we need to respond to this by breaking this paradigm in our favor.
  12. 0
    April 14 2026 19: 09
    The Kalashnikov Concern is developing its own version of a 5,45mm anti-UAV cartridge. This round is reportedly designed with a multiple-bullet design. Externally, the cartridge is identical to a standard cartridge with a conventional bullet. Actually, there was a little more information about this cartridge on the internet than in this article; but never mind... That same "information spot" also had a brief description of another "anti-drone" Kalashnikov bullet (a tumbling, elongated one with an "off-center"...), but once it appeared, I never encountered it again...
  13. 0
    April 14 2026 21: 19
    And yet, wouldn't an underbarrel grenade launcher be an option if you loaded it with a grenade shell packed with shot?! It could hold as much shot as several, if not dozens, of standard cartridges. There used to be special shotguns for commercial bird hunting—they could hold up to 1,5 kg of shot in a single shot. There was an article right here on VO about these shotguns. There's also a hand-held grenade launcher with a drum—it only needs to be reloaded after a few shots. Bird hunters should be recruited for this purpose—it'll make it easier for them to hit the targets. And athletes who shoot clay pigeons in competitions are also good candidates.
    1. 0
      April 15 2026 07: 34
      The skeet shooter is an athlete and they have a reservation.
    2. 0
      April 15 2026 14: 43
      Quote: Victor Alien
      And yet - isn't an under-barrel grenade launcher an option if you load it with a grenade filled with shot?!

      Apparently, it all comes down to the complexity of remote detonation.
  14. +1
    April 15 2026 11: 11
    Another option is to create ammunition specifically designed for use with shotguns against enemy personnel. Then the shotgun would become the standard issue weapon.
  15. 0
    2 May 2026 08: 47
    а чем плох антидроновый патрон для АК переделанный из холостого?
  16. 0
    9 May 2026 21: 45
    Держать в боекомплекте второй тип боеприпасов и сокращать носимы боезапас обычных патронов, это неправильно. С моей точки зрения, лучше пойти по пути создания подствольника, для обычных "охотничьих" патронов. Если подумать, то можно попробовать реализовать многозарядность этого подствольника. Но, это, неизбежно утяжелит оружие. Придётся изворачиваться.
  17. 0
    Yesterday, 12: 22
    Прежде, чем пытаться поразить дрон, его надо обнаружить. Поэтому в ухе у каждого солдата должен быть усилитель звука.