Intelligence impotence

23 220 23
Intelligence impotence

It’s a painfully familiar feeling to everyone – resignation, pension, well-deserved rest, a step into history and so on – but suddenly an order comes from above that you’re still vigorous, cheerful, and young and must serve a little longer. Sound familiar, right?

And so it happened in the US, and it's far from a happy ending. The U-2 spy plane was given a few more years of service, "modernized" in the style of overhauling dilapidated buildings in our country. However, let's take things step by step.




There is no replacement - this is the main problem
The prospect of decommissioning the U-2 has evoked gloomy thoughts for decades, but it never happened. In fact, the US Air Force doubts its ability to remain in service, but the problem is, there's no replacement. The U-2 can fly at high altitudes and remain airborne for long periods, collecting and sharing intelligence. The Air Force planned to retire it out of concern that it would be vulnerable in a potential future conflict.

The doubts are understandable: billions of dollars have been falling on the ground lately. And it's not even about the "AWACS" that continues in various countries, but rather the fact that even seemingly inconspicuous strategic Drones, which have almost caught up with combat aircraft in terms of cost, land with enviable regularity.

And it would be fine if this was done by countries that have modern and technologically advanced technologies Defense, but no: the Houthis are simply mocking America by shooting down Reapers with God knows what. But they shoot them down.

The growing vulnerability of the aging U-2 to air defenses of even potential lower-tier adversaries, let alone those of similarly powerful players like China and Russia, has long been an argument for retiring the aircraft.

China, in particular, continues to expand its anti-access and anti-aircraft zones and moves them further and further away from the mainland, while Russia continues to work on improving the performance of its missiles.

The U-2's vulnerability is not a new problem, but the problem is that the aircraft is not getting any younger, which cannot be said about its problems.


Just some numbers:
- U-2 flight altitude – 21,000 meters;
- maximum speed - 850 km / h;
- cruising speed – 735 km/h.

These are the three weak links. Although some still believe that altitude is the U-2's trump card. Yes, it was. It was. And that was about 60 years ago, during the Cold War. Now these performance characteristics don't seem so significant, and here's why:
- the flight altitude of the MiG-31 (dynamic ceiling, that is, the altitude to which the aircraft can reach for a short time) is 30,000 meters:
- service ceiling – 22,500 meters;
- maximum speed – 3,100 km/h;
- supersonic cruising speed – 2,500 km/h.


Photo: Donat Sorokin/TASS

We'll say nothing more; there it is, the Argument with a capital A. But let's note that only we have the MiG-31; all other countries that fall under the U-2's radar will have a harder time.

However, there are options here too. For example, the S-400 Triumph air defense system. Yes, not everyone has one today, but anyone who can afford it will not regret it. And it's best to ask opinions in India, where the air defense system has been a hit.


Photo by Sergey Malgavko/Sputnik

The system's operating range is known: 250 km, and under certain favorable conditions, up to 350 km. The altitude is a bit different, but it's still a sad time for U-2 pilots:
- the 48N6DM missile hits targets at altitudes of up to 27 km;
- 40N6E missile – up to 30 km;
- 9M96M missile – up to 35 km.

Okay, if you can't afford Russian air defense systems, you can buy Chinese ones. They're not the same, but they're cheaper. And the HQ-9's missiles can intercept targets at altitudes of up to 30 km within a 200 km radius.

Well, if we take the newest HQ-22, it has an altitude of 27 km and a range of 170 km.


The whole problem is that modern air defense systems are made to be resistant to interference and capable of operating against small targets such as UAVs and hitting ballistic missiles.

A target like the U-2—large, slow, and unmaneuverable—is purely a training target. No problems or stress. As long as it gets within range, everything will be fine.


One of the four downed U-2s at the PLA Air Force Museum in Beijing.

Even the AWACS has an advantage here: it can fly away from the area being studied, and it's easier to operate there than the U-2. There are a lot of operators, the radars are more powerful, what can I say? Everything looks more orderly than the ancient single-seat reconnaissance aircraft, in which the camera was replaced with a radar.

Although a missile will level the playing field for everyone, and if anything happens, AWACS is, of course, a sadder matter, because 30 specialists in a mass grave for one and a half billion is a very serious matter for any country that values ​​excellent specialists.

Perhaps this is why the Dragoness remains a useful high-altitude reconnaissance and information platform, capable of simultaneously carrying a wide range of different sensors for imaging, electronic reconnaissance, data transmission, and more.

U-2s, which regularly take off from various forward bases and conduct long flights near "enemy" territory, possess enormous flexibility, especially compared to satellites, which are limited by their orbit and their very short time spent over a data collection target. And this makes sense: a U-2 can "hover" over a given area for 2-4 hours, while a satellite cannot be slowed down in orbit.


The U-2 also flies in areas where there is no danger and it is expensive to fly the same AWACS, for example, in the area of ​​the border with Mexico as part of the support provided by the US military to ensure security on the southwest border.

The U-2 can fly higher than any other reconnaissance platform in the US military's inventory. Last year, this capability was on full display when the Dragon Lady flew over a Chinese spy balloon to gather intelligence (apparently, just to figure out what it was) as it hovered over US airspace before ultimately shooting it down.


A U-2 aircraft flies over a Chinese spy balloon that crossed into the United States in February 2023.


BAE Systems AN/ALQ-221 Upgrade
Considering the U-2's end of service was already in sight, with its planned retirement in 2026, it's surprising that these aging reconnaissance aircraft are still in service after 70 years. Unfortunately, there is no replacement.

And now we have received information that is truly a logical conclusion:
BAE Systems has enhanced the U-2's defense system to enable the aircraft to better detect and defend against modern radar and electronic threats.

Under the new contract with the US Air Force, BAE will provide ongoing technical support, conduct repairs to keep the system operational, and release software updates to detect and respond to new threats.


The upgrades are aimed at extending the U-2's service life to ensure it remains a key asset for the U.S. Air Force's reconnaissance missions.

The AN/ALQ-221 is a critical component of the U-2's defense system, combining radar warning receivers and electronic countermeasures to help pilots detect, identify, and neutralize enemy radar systems. Equipped with long-range sensors and onboard computing power, the system allows the aircraft to operate safely in hostile environments while collecting vital intelligence.

The AN/ALQ-221 Advanced Defensive System is a radar warning receiver and electronic countermeasure (ECM) system manufactured by BAE Systems. It was developed for use on the U.S. Air Force U-2 Dragonlady reconnaissance aircraft.

The ADS provides U-2 pilots with situational awareness and protection against threats that may reach the aircraft at high altitudes. The system, integrated with onboard electronic warfare systems, is part of the U-2 Block 20 modernization program, which includes upgraded avionics and multifunction displays in the cockpit.

Development of the ALQ-221 began in 2004. The system was delivered under the Reconnaissance Avionics Maintainability Program in 2005. The system cost $5,8 million.

In 2018, plans were developed to upgrade the system's low-frequency subsystem to operate in a "moderately contested environment." The ALQ-221 detects, classifies, and neutralizes threats using 13 receivers and transmitters. Software allows for in-flight target recognition algorithm updates.

In general, the level of protection of transport aircraft aviation and AWACS, that is, better than nothing, but it will not protect against missiles with a combined guidance system.

BAE Systems representatives say the upgrade builds on decades of experience in electronic warfare. The ADS system has been continuously improved over its nearly 60 years of service and continues to play a key role in the U-2's modernization. The aircraft's modular design and open avionics architecture allow for the rapid integration of new capabilities, ensuring the aircraft remains relevant.

Maintenance work is performed at BAE Systems' facility in Nashua, New Hampshire, with support from on-site service teams.


Aircraft industry crisis
It looks more like prolonging the agony. With the global aircraft industry in dire straits and virtually all countries except China simply incapable of creating new aircraft, extending the service life of old ones is perhaps the only correct solution.

And the Lockheed U-2 isn't alone here. The US Air Force has a fair number of aircraft that served for over fifty years: the Boeing B-52 Stratofortress, Boeing KC-135 Stratotanker, Lockheed C-130 Hercules, and Lockheed C-5 Galaxy. The Russian Aerospace Forces also boasts a number of veterans, including the Tu-22M, Tu-95, An-26, Il-76, and Il-20, all of which have exceeded 50 years of service.

The development and construction of new aircraft is a pressing issue even for supposedly established air powers like the United States and Russia. What can we say? If replacing the An-2 is a problem, what's the point of replacing the aircraft? EW update…

It's not even worth talking about Europe, there's just complete impotence there, from UAVs to fighter jets.
So extending the Dragoness' retirement is normal.

What's not normal is that the aircraft was designed to fly at altitudes above 21,000 meters, beyond the reach of enemy air defenses, to collect intelligence in any conditions. In 1956, the U-2 proved its worth by taking detailed photographs of Soviet military installations. But 1956 differs sharply from 2026 precisely because of the greater number of threats, some of which are clearly fatal.

Of course, the U-2 itself isn't quite the same: in the 1980s, newer modifications appeared, including the TR-1, U-2R, and U-2S. In 2012, the U-2S underwent significant technical changes, as we wrote about at the time.


In 2023, Lockheed Martin Skunk Works, in collaboration with the U.S. Air Force, completed the first flight of the ATR program. According to a Lockheed Martin statement, the flight tested upgraded avionics, including improved communications and navigation systems, a new open-systems computer, and modern cockpit displays.


In addition to its surveillance missions, the U-2 was used to develop and test advanced electronic sensors, calibrate space instruments, conduct high-altitude atmospheric research, and evaluate line-of-sight and over-the-horizon communications systems.

Conclusion: Adventures on your own fuselage
Of course, modernization is a good thing, but it's one thing to conduct high-altitude atmospheric research or patrol the Mexican border, and quite another to traverse the skies somewhere on the edge of the A2AD zones of countries that have everything in order with early warning radars, long-range air defense systems, and aircraft. Moreover, the U-2, in principle, only needs the first two components.

Nowadays, the use of old and obsolete aircraft, given the complete crisis of aviation design, is normal and understandable. And what the US is doing with the U-2 only proves this point. However, using such aircraft "to their full potential" seems unimportant, since the forces opposing them have made significant progress in the last 50 years.

An aircraft that was supposedly unreachable in 1956 will be the subject of hearty laughter in 2026. That's what many air defense crews around the world are talking about.

However, satellites cannot always provide all the necessary information, so U-2 pilots will have to spend some time climbing into their spacesuits and searching for... no, not information, but adventures in their fuselages.


Let's see what the continuation of this story might be.
23 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. + 14
    April 14 2026 05: 18
    Comparing apples and boxes is a rather amateurish pursuit. The author, in comparing the U-2 and MiG-31 (fundamentally different aircraft designed for virtually opposite missions), probably completely by accident neglected to mention one parameter: range. The U-2's range is 11200 km, while the MiG's is 2400. But both of these parameters are excellent for the missions for which these aircraft were designed.
    1. +6
      April 14 2026 07: 18
      Author, did we miss something? When was the "AWACS crash"? How many planes were there?
      And yes, the U-2 is hardly a key element of reconnaissance.
      1. BAI
        +3
        April 14 2026 08: 20
        When did the AWACS crash happen? How many planes were involved?

        Russia, Black Sea 2023 - 3, in Syria - 1
        1. +1
          April 14 2026 11: 40
          BAI, Persian Gulf 2026 - 1.
      2. +6
        April 14 2026 12: 37
        That's Skomorokhov. He can make a big deal out of a single incident. And not one that crashed, but one that was standing on the runway.
      3. SAG
        0
        April 15 2026 20: 38
        Quote: Civil
        Author, did we miss something? When was the "AWACS crash"? How many planes were there?
        And yes, the U-2 is hardly a key element of reconnaissance.

        Perhaps the author meant the two E-3s destroyed by Iran at the airfield?
    2. The comment was deleted.
  2. + 15
    April 14 2026 06: 44
    Before you start making fun of the PenDos and their U2, you should:
    1. launch into production and rivet a sufficient number of AN-2 replacements
    2. Remove the remaining Geofizika aircraft from hangars and check for operational readiness. Calculate the remaining service life of the airframe and engines.
    After which, decide whether it’s time to laugh or cry.
    The MiG-31 should have been compared not with the U2, but with the SR-71.
    What does AWACS have to do with it, if it’s an AWACS and not an optical reconnaissance glider, I don’t even know.
    1. +4
      April 14 2026 08: 00
      AWACS came in handy. It's always in the spotlight...
  3. +6
    April 14 2026 07: 07
    But let's note that only we have the MiG-31
    .....The key will probably be - while we still have it.
    1. +1
      April 14 2026 10: 24
      There was some information that there were only two squadrons left...
    2. -2
      April 14 2026 12: 07
      zloybond, their service life has been extended. They write that the existing reserve of spare engines (1200 D-30F6) will last for 20 years. And apparently, they plan to upgrade them to increase the fighter's speed.
      1. +1
        April 14 2026 18: 33
        This is what "for now" means. We're not building new ones like this, we're just finishing off the old ones.
        1. +1
          April 14 2026 19: 51
          zloybond, we need to create something new where we have a gap. And where there's already a good option, why waste effort and money? We were considering the MiG-41, but we looked at the MiG-31 and decided not to bother for now, since its service life could be extended by 30 years. We have over 120 MiG-31s ​​in service. And even then, they were given a new mission – launching Kinzhal missiles. Instead, we developed the Su-57, Su-35, and Su-34. Because the MiG-29 and Su-27 were no longer up to par against modern Western fighters. Currently, only three countries produce fifth-generation fighters – Russia, the US, and China.
          By the way, the Americans just bombed Iran with a B-52 from the early 50s.
  4. +4
    April 14 2026 07: 44
    What's stopping them from converting the U-2 into a drone? It will still perform its functions, there's no pilot, no life support system for said pilot, and the gains in weight, altitude, and range are obvious.
  5. 0
    April 14 2026 08: 54
    The U-2 is still in service and performs its function 100%. Yes, for modern air defense systems, it is an easy target.
  6. + 15
    April 14 2026 09: 07
    Even the AWACS has an advantage here: it can fly away from the area being studied, and it's easier to operate there than the U-2. There are a lot of operators, the radars are more powerful, what can I say? Everything looks more orderly than the ancient single-seat reconnaissance aircraft, in which the camera was replaced with a radar.

    Although a missile will level the playing field for everyone, and if anything happens, AWACS is, of course, a sadder matter, because 30 specialists in a mass grave for one and a half billion is a very serious matter for any country that values ​​excellent specialists.


    The article demonstrates a complete lack of understanding of the material.
    About the camera: No one has swapped a camera for a radar. The U-2S is equipped with the SYERS-2C multispectral system. This isn't just a camera, but a digital system that captures images in 10 bands (optical and infrared). It allows you to see objects through fog and haze at distances inaccessible to the naked eye and immediately transmit the image to headquarters.
    About radar: The ASARS-2B radar isn't a camera replacement, but a powerful complement. It's a synthetic aperture radar that creates a detailed map of the terrain even through dense clouds, where optics fail.
    The comparison with AWACS is incorrect: AWACS — is a huge flying command post for air combat management. The U-2 is a "surgical instrument" for stealthy reconnaissance at an altitude of 21 kilometers, where AWACS simply cannot reach.
    The article is a superficial rewrite with no understanding of how modern intelligence works.
    1. +7
      April 14 2026 11: 27
      The article may be true, but the author knows exactly what he's writing about. He writes everything as he pleases, that's his direction. It's called: everything's good here, or almost good, everything's bad there, but definitely no better than here.
      1. +5
        April 14 2026 12: 38
        The article may be true, but the author knows exactly what he's writing about. He writes everything as he pleases, that's his direction. It's called: everything's good here, or almost good, everything's bad there, but definitely no better than here.

        That's it. The author is deliberately misleading the reader.
  7. 0
    April 14 2026 10: 27
    Indeed, even AWACS aircraft have no chance of surviving on the battlefield, even if they "withdraw well away from the target area." The MiG-31 mentioned in the article is armed with the R-37M air-to-air missile with a range of up to 400 km. It will detect and shoot down a large target like an AWACS aircraft at maximum range.
  8. +5
    April 14 2026 14: 37
    Skomorokhov, firstly, the U-2 doesn't fly into enemy air defense zones. These aircraft conduct reconnaissance from neutral airspace or along borders, using side-on surveillance.
    Secondly, the S-400 and HQ-9 air defense systems aren't designed for mobile patrols. Their radars have a limited detection range for targets with low radar cross-sections. The U-2, even with its older materials, isn't a "noisy" target. Besides, you yourself mentioned that the U-2 is equipped with the AN/ALQ-221 electronic warfare system—which they're currently trying to modernize—and that's quite sufficient for such an aircraft.

    Well, if we're going to comment outside the article, then Skomorokhov, you've written such wonderful articles about helicopters, and more recently, about the orbital group. Why is there such a wide range of opinions?
    1. +3
      April 14 2026 20: 21
      There's a belief that when someone writes frequently and about so many things, it's inherently nonsense. It's much more interesting to read experts on a specific subject rather than know-it-alls.
  9. The comment was deleted.
  10. -1
    April 15 2026 18: 37
    Sooner or later, the Americans will cobble together a stealthy, high-altitude ELINT and optical reconnaissance aircraft—managed or unmanned—that will cover the entire frontline in a single flight, covering operational depth or half the South China Sea. And it can only be shot down by a specialized interceptor missile like the PAK-3 or TAAD, and even then, not on the first try.
  11. -1
    April 18 2026 16: 38
    This aircraft, in my subjective opinion, was, is, and will remain the best reconnaissance aircraft of all time. We've never had anything like it, nor will we ever have anything like it.