The Dropshot Plan: How the US Prepared to Wipe the USSR Off the Face of the Earth

11 007 43
The Dropshot Plan: How the US Prepared to Wipe the USSR Off the Face of the Earth
The cover of the American magazine Collier's from October 27, 1951. The entire 130-page issue was devoted to a hypothetical theme: "The Defeat and Occupation of Russia, 1952–1960; Preview of the War We Don't Want."


On December 19, 1949, the final signature was placed in Washington on a document now known by the code name "Dropshot." The Joint Chiefs of Staff of the US Armed Forces approved a plan for total war against the Soviet Union—with the massive use of nuclear, chemical, and biological weapons. weapons.



Four years have passed since the Victory Parade. Four years since Soviet and American soldiers embraced on the Elbe, and Roosevelt, Churchill, and Stalin together decided the fate of the post-war world in Yalta and Potsdam.

What happened during these four years?

On March 5, 1946, former British Prime Minister Winston Churchill gave a speech in Fulton, Missouri. He said, "From Stettin in the Baltic to Trieste in the Adriatic, an iron curtain has descended across the continent." Nine days later, Stalin compared Churchill to Hitler in an interview with Pravda. Allies were turning into adversaries.

Then came the creation of NATO in April 1949, the signing of the Marshall Plan, and the split of Germany into two. The Cold War was gaining momentum, and Washington understood one thing: time was working against them. Every month, Soviet industry was rebuilding, Soviet scientists were getting closer to their own atomic bomb, and the Soviet army remained the largest in the world.

The Pentagon decided: we need to act while there is still a chance.

Count bombs


Dropshot didn't just happen. It was the culmination of a series of increasingly ambitious plans for nuclear war against the USSR.

In the fall of 1945, two months after Japan's surrender, the US Joint Intelligence Committee submitted report number 329. The first sentence read:
"Select approximately twenty targets suitable for strategic atomic bombing of the USSR."


American plan for nuclear strikes against the USSR

Directive No. 432/d of December 14, 1945 specified:
"The most effective weapon that the United States can use to strike the USSR is the atomic bombs it has."

Then the appetites grew.

Plan "Totality" (1945) - twenty cities, including Moscow, Leningrad, Gorky, Sverdlovsk, Novosibirsk. Plan "Pincher" (June 1946) - fifty bombs on twenty cities. Plan "Broiler" (March 1948) - thirty-four bombs on twenty-four cities. Plan "Sizzle" (December 1948) - one hundred and thirty-three bombs on seventy cities. Plan "Shakedown" (October 1949) - two hundred and twenty bombs on one hundred and four cities.

And finally, "Dropshot" - three hundred atomic bombs and twenty-nine thousand tons of conventional explosives on one hundred cities of the Soviet Union.

In 1987, American physicists Mikio Kaku and Donnel Axelrod published a study in which they counted at least eighteen nuclear war plans developed by the Pentagon. Eighteen plans for the destruction of a country that had lost twenty-seven million people fighting a common enemy.

Part Three. Four Phases of the Apocalypse


Dropshot stipulated a specific date for the start of the war: January 1, 1957. The motivation: an alleged act of aggression by the USSR and its allies.

The document details four phases.

Phase One — D-Day. The single day marking the beginning of the nuclear bombing of the USSR. The goal was to "stabilize the early Soviet offensive."

Phase two — the beginning of large-scale offensive operations along the entire front line by all branches of the armed forces.

Phase three — conducting offensive operations until the capitulation of the Soviet Union.

Phase Four — establishing control and ensuring compliance with the terms of surrender.
The fourteenth paragraph of the first chapter of the fourth section stated:
"Nuclear weapons will be used by both sides. Other weapons of mass destruction may be used by either side, taking into account considerations of retaliation and effectiveness."

The capitulated USSR was planned to be divided into four occupation zones: the western part, the Caucasus and Ukraine, the Urals with Western Siberia and Turkestan, and Eastern Siberia with Transbaikal and Primorye. These four zones were further divided into twenty-two subzones. A couple of American armies would be stationed in Moscow. One division each would be assigned to Leningrad, Murmansk, Gorky, Kuibyshev, Kyiv, and fifteen other cities.

According to the plan, the US allies included all NATO members—Canada, Great Britain, France, Belgium, the Netherlands, Luxembourg, Italy, Norway, Denmark, Iceland, Portugal, as well as parts of China, the Philippines, and the British Commonwealth countries (except India and Pakistan). The USSR's allies included Poland, Finland, Czechoslovakia, Hungary, Albania, Romania, Bulgaria, Mongolia, Manchuria, Korea, and Communist China. Yugoslavia, according to American calculations, would adopt a position closer to neutrality.

Why didn't the nuclear New Year of 1957 happen?


On September 3, 1949, an American B-29 bomber was patrolling the North Pacific. Instruments detected abnormally high levels of radioactivity in the upper atmosphere. A test revealed that the Soviet Union had conducted its own nuclear weapons test. An RDS-1 charge was detonated at the Semipalatinsk test site.


President Harry Truman, upon learning of this, asked, "What do we do now?" Washington remained silent for three weeks, fearing panic among Americans.

The Pentagon's response: start a race for the hydrogen bomb. Get it first, regain military superiority.

Did not work.

On August 20, 1953, TASS reported:
"Recently, a type of hydrogen bomb was detonated in the Soviet Union for testing purposes."

On October 4, 1957, the USSR launched the first artificial satellite into orbit. This meant that the Soviet Union had missiles Intercontinental range. The R-7 missile could deliver a three-megaton nuclear warhead a distance of 8,800 kilometers. The distance from Moscow to Washington is 7,850 kilometers. The distance from Petropavlovsk-Kamchatsky to Los Angeles is 6,600 kilometers.

There was shock in the White House.

The scenario of an unpunished nuclear bombing of the USSR is a thing of the past. Pentagon strategists miscalculated on every count.

The document that was returned


Dropshot was declassified in 1978 under President Jimmy Carter. By then, the plan had already become historical The curiosity is evidence of how close the world came to disaster.

In the eight years between the plan's approval and the anticipated start of the war, everything changed. Stalin died, Eisenhower became US president, and Khrushchev delivered a speech on the cult of personality. The Rosenbergs were executed for espionage—they had passed information on the American nuclear program to the USSR. The first nuclear submarine, the USS Nautilus, was launched. A Soviet bomber made the first round-trip flight to the US with refueling.

The world was changing rapidly, but one thing remained constant: neither side could allow a nuclear war, because there would be no losers.

Mikhail Kovalchuk, President of the Kurchatov Institute National Research Center, put it this way:
"We realized our strategic priority by creating the bomb, establishing nuclear parity in the world for decades to come. Thanks to the successful implementation of the Soviet atomic project, we not only survived as a sovereign state but also literally changed the face of civilization."


***
"Dropshot" isn't an archival curiosity. It's a document proving that international security rests not on good intentions, but on a balance of power. As long as there's balance, there's peace. Disturb the balance, and you'll get three hundred bombs dropped on a hundred cities.

The story of the Dropshot plan shows how quickly former allies turn into potential adversaries, how paper strategies develop into real threats, and how the only way to prevent disaster is to have the ability to respond.

Seventeen plans for a nuclear war against the USSR remained on paper. The eighteenth, too. But each one once sat on a desk in the Pentagon, marked "Top Secret" and with a specific start date. Each one was seriously considered.

Three hundred bombs. One hundred cities. Four occupation zones. Twenty-two subzones.

This is not science fiction. It is a document signed by the Chiefs of Staff of the United States of America on December 19, 1949.
43 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +1
    April 12 2026 05: 21
    I wonder how the Americans planned to deploy their troops after the atomic bombings in the radiation-contaminated territories of the USSR? what
    1. +5
      April 12 2026 05: 25
      No way, this plan was a fantasy far beyond the realm of possibility.
    2. + 17
      April 12 2026 06: 19
      These documents and plans for the placement of zones should be remembered first and foremost by those who adhere to the understandings in the spirit of anchorages, etc.

      PS: We would have all been killed long ago if it weren't for Comrade Stalin and Comrade Beria, who organized the creation of nuclear weapons by Comrade Kurchatov and his team (with the assistance of the then still effective intelligence).
      P.S.: Current intelligence apparently can't get hold of lithograph blueprints or other technologies, like assembly-line robots, satellites, etc., that is, what the country needs, or what the oligarchs can't organize nowadays, except for yachting and wearing out Soviet-era production facilities... something like that...
      1. +3
        April 12 2026 15: 45
        Quote: Last centurion
        what the country needs or what the oligarchs cannot organize nowadays

        That's how Russian oligarchs work for the West, storing the money they stole from you there, and their families and property are also there. They were never your people.
    3. +6
      April 12 2026 06: 22
      just like after the atomic bombing of Japan
    4. +3
      April 12 2026 11: 16
      At that time, there was no accumulated data on the harm of radiation, and it wasn't feared as much as it is today. For example, there were experiments in which a bomb was detonated directly over people (they later reported seeing the bones in their hands through their closed eyelids).
      Well, we mustn’t forget that the times were a little more “barbaric”.
      1. +4
        April 12 2026 12: 59
        They later told how they saw the bones of the hands through their closed eyelids.

        The lens of the eye cannot focus penetrating radiation.
      2. +4
        April 12 2026 15: 52
        Quote from Neutral Neutral
        Well, we mustn’t forget that the times were a little more “barbaric”.

        Times today are no less barbaric, only well veiled by the bright colors of "democracy."
    5. +1
      April 12 2026 12: 35
      Quote: The same Lech
      I wonder how the Americans planned to deploy their troops after the atomic bombings in the radiation-contaminated territories of the USSR? what
      Back then, no one cared about radiation. Even children's "Young Physicist" construction sets with radioactive materials were still around. The consequences weren't realized until much later.
      1. 0
        April 12 2026 12: 56
        The consequences were realized much later.

        It seems that Becquerel also got an ulcer from an ampoule of radium in his pocket.
        1. 0
          April 12 2026 18: 50
          Quote from: ln_ln
          It seems that Becquerel also got an ulcer from an ampoule of radium in his pocket.
          There were casualties, yes. For example, one American separated the fallen plutonium hemispheres with his hands, prevented a catastrophe, and died. But this didn't stop the American command from conducting several "mushroom-like" exercises. Or watching nuclear explosions from Las Vegas. People didn't get it. It's understandable—so what? There are no poisons, no toxic agents, the main damaging factors have passed. Years passed before the consequences of ionization of the cellular environment were understood, before the powers that be were explained.
    6. -2
      April 12 2026 15: 47
      Quote: The same LYOKHA
      I wonder how the Americans planned to deploy their troops after the atomic bombings in radiation-contaminated areas.

      So they had no intention of deploying troops. Only bombing.
    7. 0
      April 13 2026 07: 45
      Quote: The same LYOKHA
      I wonder how the Americans planned to deploy their troops after the atomic bombings in the radiation-contaminated territories of the USSR?


      And how did they deploy their troops and establish their bases in Japan after the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki? Of course, they used more than two bombs against the USSR, but the USSR's territory was also larger than Japan's. The occupation would have been carried out more by the US's junior partners, and they were also counting on collaborators.
  2. + 11
    April 12 2026 06: 07
    Seventeen plans for a nuclear war against the USSR remained on paper. The eighteenth one too
    And that's the main thing. That's how it should be.

    Happy Bright Resurrection of Christ to all Orthodox Christians and all the best.

    Christ is Risen!
    1. +3
      April 12 2026 08: 22
      Quote: Olgovich
      Happy Bright Resurrection of Christ to all Orthodox Christians and all the best.
  3. +7
    April 12 2026 06: 22
    Well, if we're being realistic, we, the USSR, also had plans for NATO... Happy Cosmonautics Day, comrades.
    1. +2
      April 12 2026 06: 47
      And magazines in the US were private and could publish any nonsense.
    2. +6
      April 12 2026 07: 04
      Quote from: dmi.pris1
      Well, if we're being realistic, we, the USSR, also had plans for NATO... Happy Cosmonautics Day, comrades.

      Well, they're unknown. Some vague plans are known regarding the deployment of tank armies to the English Channel, but nothing more.
    3. +1
      April 12 2026 08: 41
      Quote from: dmi.pris1
      The USSR had plans for NATO

      It would be strange not to have them... Operation "Unthinkable" began to be thought of when the Great Patriotic War hadn't even ended yet, we had to respond somehow... to a bomb with a bomb, to NATO with Warsaw, and so on.
    4. +3
      April 12 2026 15: 34
      Quote from: dmi.pris1
      Happy Cosmonautics Day, comrades.

      At that time the USSR was ahead of the rest of the world.
  4. +6
    April 12 2026 06: 31
    It turns out that at the highest levels, smiles and hugs don't guarantee peace. And peace is maintained by science, industry, and the military.
    In the 90s, all this received a serious blow.
    Maybe one day they will evaluate the work of Gorbachev and Yeltsin?
    1. +2
      April 12 2026 07: 05
      Quote: Ed Mack
      Maybe one day they will evaluate the work of Gorbachev and Yeltsin?

      You forgot the third of this triumvirate.
      1. +2
        April 12 2026 08: 45
        Quote: Puncher
        You forgot the third one

        In fact, the "enemies" in their documentaries about that time greatly regret that the 3rd was somehow too harsh with those who opened the door with their feet for the 2nd...
      2. 0
        April 12 2026 15: 29
        Quote: Puncher
        You forgot the third of this triumvirate.

        Navalny or something?
        1. -1
          April 13 2026 15: 30
          Quote: carpenter
          Quote: Puncher
          You forgot the third of this triumvirate.

          Navalny or something?

          It seems everyone has forgotten the names Gusinsky, Berezovsky, Khodorkovsky, etc. Someone threw them out of Russia, with all their children and household members... hangers-on and lackeys... Someone else could have given a good kick in the ass... Chubais, who became Moishe... But he could have sat and fed lice.
          1. 0
            April 13 2026 16: 06
            Quote: 30 vis
            Chubais, who became Moishe... But he could have sat and fed lice.

            You can't put a Jew in jail even in Russia.
      3. +1
        April 13 2026 07: 48
        This third one, however, has abruptly changed course. A worthy "third one" would have been Yavlinsky, Khodorkovsky, Navalny... but they're not specifically involved.
    2. 0
      April 12 2026 15: 32
      Quote: Ed Mack
      And the world is held together by science, industry, and the army.

      And popular support. Without it, all of the above is empty talk.
    3. +1
      April 12 2026 15: 34
      Quote: Ed Mack
      Maybe one day they will evaluate the work of Gorbachev and Yeltsin?

      Who will give it? The people have already given their assessment, but who cares about them? sad
  5. -2
    April 12 2026 06: 51
    Quote: Ed Mack
    In the 90s, all this received a serious blow.
    Maybe one day they will evaluate the work of Gorbachev and Yeltsin?

    We will have to go through this Golgotha.
    1. 0
      April 12 2026 07: 09
      Who is this for—US? Don't pay attention, I didn't vote for Putin, or for Yeltsin either. It's too bad for the communists (the first ones have gone under), and now for the LDPR (that's who I voted for at first).
  6. The comment was deleted.
  7. +4
    April 12 2026 08: 28
    On October 4, 1957, the USSR launched the first artificial satellite into orbit.

    In the USSR, they rejoiced and listened to the "beep-beep-beep" on the radio. And in the Oval Office, everyone was shocked... laughing
  8. 0
    April 12 2026 10: 00
    The Pentagon decided: we need to act while there is still a chance.

    This approach will always be there.
  9. 0
    April 12 2026 10: 11
    1) The Americans declassified it. Nothing's been heard about our similar ones. There was one article about a Soviet plan here on VO. And that's it.
    2) It is always hypocritically kept silent - why would that be? And how will it begin?
    According to leaked information and the "Unthinkable" plan, it was a response to the advance of Soviet armored forces, as conventional weapons were unstoppable.
    3) The General Staff is there to make plans for any eventuality. Something happened, the Martians invaded, and you already have a folder full of countermeasures...
    4) In general, the Americans are bad, and as for our plans to strike with nuclear weapons (and we seem to be superior to the US in nuclear weapons even now), no-no. That is, we have missiles, submarines, and nuclear weapons. But as for plans - how and what - there is nothing. And nothing has been declassified.
  10. -5
    April 12 2026 11: 11
    Motivation: alleged act of aggression by the USSR and its allies.

    As the author vaguely explained, Dropshot was a purely defensive plan to repel Soviet aggression. One sentence completely negates the entire point of his article, with all its pathos.
  11. +1
    April 12 2026 12: 54
    Neither side could allow a nuclear war because there would be NO LOSER in it.

    AI rules again?
  12. -1
    April 12 2026 15: 24
    Eighteen plans to destroy a country that lost twenty-seven million people in the fight against a common enemy.

    The enemy is not a common one, but the enemy of the USSR and its people. The rest of the "allies" are friends of the common enemy.
  13. 0
    April 12 2026 17: 41
    Little amendment.
    In 1949, no one could drop atomic bombs on my hometown of Novokuznetsk.
    For the reason that it was then called Stalinsk and became Novokuznetsk only in 1960.
  14. 0
    April 12 2026 21: 25
    Interestingly, according to this very same "Dropshot" plan, after the US victory, the plan was to recruit as many émigrés as possible to govern the remnants of the divided USSR. This was intended to prevent any revival or restoration. As anyone may have noticed, this was actually implemented in the 90s. Thanks to the efforts of the Bun Crunchers, the former superpower was reduced to a mere husk.
  15. 0
    April 12 2026 22: 00
    A good article. It proves we can't live together on this planet. It's either the Americans or us. Whoever breeds all these "spirits" needs to go, and as soon as possible.
  16. 0
    April 13 2026 15: 38
    Cover of the American magazine Collier's from October 27, 1951

    It looks suspiciously like (where is OCCUPIED) what is now under NATO.
  17. -1
    April 13 2026 23: 42
    But there's still a small nuance. Would an adversary of the US and the EU dare to use nuclear weapons if their children and grandchildren are studying at Cambridge, Eton, and the Sorbonne, and they expect to live out their happy old age there?
  18. 0
    10 May 2026 20: 05
    As a hypothetical plan, I do not believe that the Americans would have had the courage to destroy the Soviet Union with nuclear weapons if there was an opportunity to destroy the Soviet Union through economic sanctions.