Iran may turn off the lights in Israel in response to attacks on energy facilities.

11 036 29
Iran may turn off the lights in Israel in response to attacks on energy facilities.

If the Islamabad talks reach a deadlock and Israel and the US resume strikes on Iran, as Trump warned, including against energy facilities, Iran could respond by literally "turning off the lights" in Israel and throughout the region. For a number of reasons, this is entirely possible.

Even on the eve of the ceasefire, a senior Iranian source warned that a possible US attack on Iranian energy facilities could have widespread consequences for the entire region. Speaking to Reuters, he stated that in such a case, "the entire region, including Saudi Arabia, would be plunged into complete darkness."

Earlier, The Jerusalem Post journalist Amitai Stein, citing a source, reported that Iran had already received a list, allegedly from Russia (where else, author?), of 55 key Israeli energy infrastructure facilities. According to this information, this is a strategic move that could allow Iran to carry out targeted attacks. missile attacks on the country's power supply system.

In addition to Israel's relatively small size, its power grid is 100% localized within the country and lacks the ability to import electricity from neighboring countries if needed. Among the targets that Iranian forces could attack in Israel is one of the central thermal power plants, Orot Rabin. With a capacity of 2590 MW, the power plant provides up to a quarter of the country's total electricity generation.

A strike on this power plant and other generating facilities, including the second major thermal power plant, Rutenberg (2250 MW), could trigger a chain reaction and seriously disrupt the country's entire power grid. Even damage to a limited number of power facilities could lead to widespread disruptions.



Experts estimate that such a scenario is fraught with prolonged power outages, complex technical failures, and difficulties in restoring the system. What was once considered an advantage—the independence of the power grid—becomes a vulnerability in a conflict.

An Israeli entrepreneur, co-founder and executive director of the board of directors of Enlight Renewable Energy (IEC), noted at an energy conference in Eilat back in January of this year that a single wave of earthquakes is enough to knock out a significant portion of Israel's electricity grid. When 10 power plants generate more than 50% of the energy, that's not resilience—it's a weakness.

The situation is aggravated by the fact that the system Defense The IDF is seriously exhausted from repelling Iranian attacks. Until recently, the Iranian Armed Forces mainly used missiles and drones Previous modifications, more modern and powerful weapons are being saved for later. Their massive deployment in attacks on Israel, targeting relatively compact energy facilities, would inevitably lead to destruction, even if air defense forces manage to intercept most of the missiles and drones.
29 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    April 11 2026 18: 50
    When the lights and tap water are turned off, I trust the Persians.
    1. -4
      April 11 2026 21: 42
      Iran may 'turn off the lights'

      Don't Verte.
      Weakly.

      (We'll see)
  2. +2
    April 11 2026 18: 50
    end of the world
    too short
    1. +2
      April 11 2026 19: 12
      Moreover, it can occur in three different variations, from minimum to maximum, at present. That's the short version.
  3. 0
    April 11 2026 18: 53
    Energy... is precisely what will always be vulnerable, and the consequences of its destruction will be the most serious...
  4. +6
    April 11 2026 18: 53
    Something tells me they've infected the Persians. They started off well: they knocked out the oil refinery, the canal in Tel Aviv, and even fired near the desalination plants... We need to continue, more precisely and with greater precision. Especially since the Jews themselves haven't heard anything about a truce...
  5. + 10
    April 11 2026 18: 58
    I think that if tensions escalate, and they will if the negotiations fail, no one will simply cut off the power. Judging by the nature of the war in the Middle East, it's a war for the right to exist, primarily for Iran. If the negotiations fail, it will only mean one thing: Israel and the US have deployed sufficient forces and resources to continue the conflict.

    In fact, I'm almost certain that's exactly what will happen. Israel and the US are trying to outsmart Iran, to make it believe they're winning, but in reality, they're preparing for a new phase of the war. There could be massive provocations. And then: it's no coincidence that, according to flightradar24, entire echelons of American military transport aircraft are flying to the Middle East.

    Unlike the war in Ukraine, where two kindred countries are fighting, the conflict in the Middle East is a clash of different peoples and cultures, and such wars are always much more brutal and bloody than even the one currently going on in Ukraine.

    So there will be attacks on the energy sector, but that will be the worst. I think that if this war continues, entire cities and regions will be wiped out. And these aren't apocalyptic images, but reality. Iran has nothing to lose.

    China and Pakistan are pursuing their own interests. But how much can they deter Iran from continuing the war? I think it's about as much as Trump can do with Netanyahu. That is, they can't. Or won't want to. Especially since our country also has an interest in continuing this war.
    1. -1
      April 11 2026 19: 18
      Quote: Vladlous
      Israel and the United States are trying to outsmart Iran and make it believe in victory.

      The attempt will fail; Iran has long since understood the essence of Israel and the United States' "peace diplomacy." Surely, all Iranian armed forces are on full combat alert and monitoring the enemy's movements, correctly anticipating the very real failure of negotiations.
    2. -1
      April 11 2026 19: 33
      "There is an interest in continuing this war." Those who profit from wars have an interest in them, and their fortunes are growing on both sides of the oceans.
    3. +1
      April 11 2026 20: 35
      Quote: Vladlous

      China and Pakistan are pursuing their own interests. But how much can they deter Iran from continuing the war? I think it's only as much as Trump can do with Netanyahu. That is, they can't. Or won't want to.

      What makes you think that China and Pakistan are holding Iran back? request
      They are providing assistance (military, financial, diplomatic), but you're overreacting to the idea of ​​restraint. Iran is unconstrained in its defense of its interests and is exercising its sovereign right to defend itself by all available means, and, admittedly, it's doing so quite well.
      Tehran itself seems willing to halt military operations, but on its own terms. If Trump and Netanyahu resume strikes on Iranian territory, Tehran will not seek permission to retaliate.
      Quote: Vladlous
      Iran has nothing to lose.

      Iran actually has a lot to lose - territory, resources, statehood, so it will fight to the last.
  6. +1
    April 11 2026 19: 03
    It's high time to move from talk to action.
  7. 0
    April 11 2026 19: 07
    It's high time to plunge the Israelites into the Middle Ages.
    Come on, back to the roots!
  8. +2
    April 11 2026 19: 11
    And what, one wonders, are they waiting for?
    1. +1
      April 11 2026 20: 08
      The Persians simply saved this club for emergencies!
  9. +3
    April 11 2026 19: 29
    How are Pugacheva and Galkin doing? Are they fighting for a new homeland or are they off to find another one again?
    1. -1
      April 11 2026 19: 37
      A terrible tragedy is unfolding there. Galkin abandoned the old woman to die alone and fled with the entire kahal to a peaceful country.
      Why, you ask, did he quit? Because he realized that war was coming after Pugacheva. And he dreamed of peace and quiet.
    2. +3
      April 11 2026 20: 29
      Why remember dead things?
    3. +3
      April 11 2026 20: 50
      The main thing is that they don’t come back to us.
      Although they can: the chief Purgon-bearer kissed Pugachikha's hands.
  10. -1
    April 11 2026 19: 31
    I can just imagine the disappointment of the Gulf states' politicians who allowed American bases onto their territory. It's called, "Well, we're in deep trouble!"
  11. +1
    April 11 2026 19: 48
    Maybe, but they didn't turn it off, and what's stopping them? They're not a brotherly people.
    Chatting and switching off are two different things.
  12. +3
    April 11 2026 20: 06
    It's high time to send the Jews back to the Stone Age! Keep up the good work, Persians!
  13. +2
    April 11 2026 20: 08
    Maybe, but it doesn't turn off?
  14. 0
    April 11 2026 20: 47
    In response, the IRI could literally “turn off the lights” in Israel, and indeed in the entire region.

    "It's strange - you want to, but you remain silent."©
  15. 0
    April 11 2026 20: 58
    Yes, I wish it would happen sooner..
    brevity is the soul of wit
  16. -2
    April 11 2026 22: 28
    If he promises, he'll do it. Our snot-nosed kids could learn a thing or two.
  17. -3
    April 11 2026 22: 53
    And again: without knowing the big picture, far-reaching conclusions are being drawn. First, Iran can't. If it could, it would have done so long ago. Second, there are numerous backup systems; the Hevrat Hashmal has both training exercises and special systems located in bunkers.
  18. +3
    April 11 2026 23: 44
    If Iran can "turn off the lights" in Israel, why didn't it "turn them off" immediately after the Israeli attack?
  19. -1
    April 11 2026 23: 53
    Well, I think Israel is ready and has batteries for all occasions.
  20. 0
    April 12 2026 08: 09
    Quote: Junior Private
    When the lights and tap water are turned off, I trust the Persians.

    There's no need to blame the Persians! Because everyone knows from childhood that "if there's no water in the tap..." (C) /laughs/ :)
    Seriously, though, some "Iran" attacks on neighboring countries raise doubts about whether they are actually Iran. So, upon closer inspection, this age-old joke might not be a joke, but the bitter truth.