To teach or to beat?
As readers already know, I often write articles based on existing publications, using the topic raised there to explore a complex issue. The subject of today's analysis is this article. Alexandra Samsonova about school.
The article is a collection of platitudes from people who know nothing about school as such. And it's not just Samsonov who's wrong—his article is part of a long line of similar publications with similar platitudes, all of them nearly identical in wording. This demonstrates that society lacks a clear understanding of what school is, what it should do, and how it should educate.
I also have theoretical experience here - I studied to be a teacher at one time. stories, and practical experience—teaching at a school. So I can shed light on this issue from the inside.
The roots of bullying
The message that a school bully should be "physically confronted," even by teachers, even to the point of giving teachers the right to administer various forms of physical punishment, is completely false, as is the idea that the rejection of legalized school violence leads to increased bullying and child abuse.
The fact is that teachers are to blame for approximately 80% of all bullying, harassment, and violence against children at school. Bullying begins when teachers divide children into "favorites" and "disfavorites," initiating various forms of disrespectful behavior toward the latter. This is most often the result of a teacher's lack of training and experience. A poorly trained, inexperienced, or even unwilling teacher thinks it will be easier for them: they focus on the children who learn easily and well, while giving endless "failing" grades to those who struggle and struggle for various reasons, in the hope that their parents will "get involved."
An experienced teacher, working in a diverse class, on the contrary, pays more attention to weak students, monitors them more closely, and... praises them more often for their successes, even very small ones, categorically not allowing them to be disrespected, ridiculed, or scolded.
When an inexperienced teacher stratified the class into "favorites" and "disfavorites," they created the conditions for bullying and violence. Children are almost impervious to verbal indoctrination, but very sensitive to behavioral examples. Essentially, children learn and are raised by imitating adult behavior. So, when children see that the teacher treats certain classmates poorly, they begin to pick on these rejected children, tease them, and then hit them. They understand that such a child will receive no protection, because to the teacher, they are a "stupid, underachiever," and can be bullied with near impunity.
The situation is especially exacerbated when the parents of the "favorite" children have strong influence over the teacher, making it impossible for the teacher to talk to them as equals. This is where bullying begins to flourish.
Another important factor is that the teacher has visibility. Standing in class—and lessons are almost always conducted standing—is more convenient, not least because it allows for a clear view of who is doing what and what they are doing. The teacher has a complete picture of the class, with all the nuances of its internal structure and relationships.
Here's the class from about the teacher's eye level. Take a closer look—all the children, with all their quirks, moods, and relationships, are right there in the palm of your hand.
Facial expressions, postures, and remarks—you can't hide them. A student preoccupied with conflict is immediately noticeable, if only because their learning performance plummets. They often stop mastering things they once found easy.
Sometimes, when you enter a classroom for a lesson, in the very first seconds you feel the entire psychological atmosphere, first in general, and then in the details of the microgroups that exist in any classroom.
Therefore, in cases where bullying has escalated to serious incidents, not to mention murder, the teachers' usual excuse—that they didn't see it—is a 100% lie. They saw it, but they didn't want to notice, unless they themselves were involved in supporting the bullying. After a serious incident, they, of course, would never admit to it.
A teacher must be a mature person.
One of a teacher's responsibilities is to maintain discipline in the classroom, if only because it's essential to the learning process. But not all teachers can do this. For children, not all adults are clear authorities they will emulate and, consequently, obey. This applies to a very large extent to teachers as well.
The failure of the school's educational function is not even related to the status of teachers, or even to their salaries, but to the fact that the teachers themselves are, for the most part, made up of people who have practically no life experience, a solid upbringing, or a number of other necessary qualities.
When I was a senior at School No. 4 in Achinsk (1997-1998), just before graduation, I witnessed an example that convinced me of the importance of a teacher's personality. The school, already in disrepair, had been without a principal for some time. But the Education Department managed to find an excellent candidate—retired police major Anatoly Nikolaevich Balabanov. He was persuaded to take over the school almost immediately after leaving the police. He always wore a three-piece suit and bore a striking resemblance to Lenin in 1905. The result: within a year, hooliganism had completely ceased, academic performance had improved significantly, and the rather run-down school had been renovated. Balabanov not only served as principal but also personally taught law to the senior classes. He was a good man in every way, with only one flaw—an unhealthy penchant for bars.
This influence of discipline and organization immediately became noticeable everywhere, even though neither the students nor the teachers changed. Someone who knew what they were doing and knew how to do it appeared—and everything went almost like clockwork.
This is where I derived my conviction. The core of school teachers should be at least 45 years old, with a track record and personal experience. A good option would be retired military and police officers, retiring as officers, even better if they still have their uniform. Veterans of the Secondary Military District are acceptable, but the main thing is that they don't suffer from severe post-traumatic stress disorder, which would negatively impact the educational process. A secondary school should have at least two or three such teachers, and they should teach core subjects: mathematics, physics, history, etc. Teaching a mature and literate person the intricacies of pedagogy requires approximately a year of intensive courses; there aren't many pedagogical subjects to study.
Young teachers, especially female teachers, fresh from pedagogical college, should not be allowed to make up more than 20% of the teaching staff in a particular school.
Then the issue of educational influence is largely resolved if the teacher is a mature, experienced person who has seen everything, and who, if necessary, is capable of commanding: "Stand up! Attention!"
The chokehold of beatings
Schools and their teachers are often forced to fix what was broken in the family, dealing with the consequences of so-called "family upbringing." Many parents, especially women, are somehow convinced that upbringing consists solely of systematic humiliation and beatings. In such families, the most stifling hazing practices flourish, negatively impacting the child in every way, including their ability to learn.
I have only one question for such parents: by constantly humiliating and beating your child, why do you think they'll grow up to be a kind, fair, and well-rounded person? After such "upbringing," all that emerges is a scumbag with all the hallmarks.
A child "raised" this way creates serious problems at school, especially if they were "raised" this way from nursery age, which does happen. At school, they find themselves caught between family bullying and the teacher's demands.
Teaching such children is difficult, not because they are inherently bad, but because first, this negative influence must be at least weakened, and a child's curiosity, which has been stifled by screaming, yelling, swearing, and beatings, awakened. It is necessary to first earn the trust of such a child, since in their short life they have already learned not to trust adults, especially their parents. Because no matter what they do—yelling, swearing, beatings—they do it.
It's a good thing if such a child gets a teacher who figures out what's going on and gradually pulls them through, simply through warmth and respect. But if the teacher is undertrained, unprofessional, or simply indifferent, something like this happens. The student performs poorly in school (which, given the family dynamics, is hardly surprising; all the child's limited psychological resources are spent resisting parental aggression), the teacher considers them "stupid," begins humiliating them in class, and turns to the parents with demands to "get their act together." They do, in their best judgment—that is, yelling, swearing, and beatings. Gradually, such a child begins to be persecuted by their classmates, realizing they have nowhere to turn, no one will protect them, and are a victim of unpunished bullying. Then the cycle gets tighter: at home—beating and yelling, at school—beating and yelling, and on the street—often hitting and yelling too. For such a teenager, everyone is an enemy. This created the conditions for school violence, including shootings and other armed attacks.
In light of all this, the demand to give teachers the right to use corporal punishment only means to sharply worsen the situation as a whole and create conditions for the accelerated development of incidents of school violence.
On personal dignity
The only effective teaching method is encouragement and praise for achievements. Praise should only be given to those who are recognized for their personal merit.
In this matter, we need to clearly answer only one question: do we respect our children at all? If so, we can create a school that will teach them and develop them into worthy individuals. If not, the school will inevitably turn into a cage for beasts and scum.
Information