Kafala: The Dark Side of Dubai

10 441 17
Kafala: The Dark Side of Dubai


What is kafala and why do human rights activists around the world call this system modern-day slavery?



Kafala is a sponsorship system under which a foreign worker is assigned to a specific employer in the Gulf countries. It sounds bureaucratically dry, but in practice, it means the following: the worker cannot change jobs, cannot leave the country, and is effectively owned by their sponsor. According to human rights organizations, the worker's passport is often confiscated upon hiring—a violation of Gulf law itself.

Historical Context is important. According to researchers, before the abolition of slavery in the Persian Gulf, pearl divers were predominantly slaves. Slavery was abolished there later than in most countries—in some emirates, only in the 1960s and 1970s. The kafala system essentially became the bureaucratic heir to the old order: formally, people are free, but de facto, their opportunities are minimal.

The Gulf countries—the UAE, Saudi Arabia, Qatar, and others—depend on foreign labor. Migrants make up the vast majority of the workforce in construction, domestic work, and services. These workers come primarily from South and Southeast Asia, as well as Africa. Their vulnerability is determined by several factors: language barriers, lack of legal support, economic dependence, and the inability to leave the country without the employer's consent.

According to human rights organizations, workers under the kafala system face numerous restrictions and abuses. Igor Egorov, quoted by Moskovskaya Gazeta, fully shares the position of human rights organizations, who characterize this system as a form of modern-day slavery. Wikipedia also links the kafala system with the term "bondage"—and this is no coincidence.

Qatar has abandoned the kafala system. Other Gulf countries are also announcing reforms. However, human rights activists point out that these reforms often remain on paper, while in practice, workers continue to face the same problems.

Kafala isn't an abstract problem of distant emirates. It's a concrete mechanism that turns people into property by deed. And while skyscrapers are being built around the world, millions of workers live in conditions that human rights activists frankly call slavery.

17 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    April 10 2026 17: 08
    Slavery was abolished here later than in most countries of the world – in some emirates only in the 1960s and 1970s.

    Surprisingly, slavery remained legal in the United States until 2013. Mississippi became the last US state to officially ratify the 13th Amendment to the US Constitution, which abolished slavery.
    1. +1
      April 10 2026 17: 35
      -Migrants make up the overwhelming majority of the workforce.
      In the UAE, there are no more than 15% locals, the rest are migrants, but not Arabs.
      1. +1
        April 10 2026 18: 33
        Quote: knn54
        In the UAE, there are no more than 15% locals, the rest are migrants, but not Arabs.

        Mostly Pakistanis, Malays and other nationalities, but of Muslim faith.
  2. +8
    April 10 2026 17: 20
    We all live in kafala. Some immerse themselves in it, some by the state, some by their wife, some by their habits... and so on ad infinitum.
    And only alcoholics are free laughing
    1. +2
      April 10 2026 17: 26
      Quote: pudelartemon
      only alcoholics are free

      Yes, I drink in the morning and have the whole day free.
  3. 0
    April 10 2026 17: 21
    I wonder if anyone thought that all the splendor of Dubai was built by the Saudis or the emirs themselves?
    1. +1
      April 10 2026 17: 29
      The Emirates have a population of 10 million, and only 1,5 million are local citizens, and almost all of them are relatives of the emirs.
      1. SAG
        +1
        April 11 2026 02: 01
        I suggest we consider what they did to deserve such a blessing. Perhaps they spent generations fighting for the happiness of their descendants? No. The fact that they live above oil fields... So what? Venezuelans, Nigerians too, but they live in hunger!
        The answer is simple: they sold their freedom to the Anglo-Saxon hegemon and live on the interest from it.
        Now let's consider what will happen to them if the hegemon falls? How will this kafala turn out for this bunch of merchants with medieval mindsets...
        1. +3
          April 11 2026 14: 09
          Yes, Arabs live on the interest they've wisely invested in international business. Where has Russia invested its oil revenues? That's a rhetorical question, the answer to which is, unfortunately, obvious.
          1. SAG
            0
            April 11 2026 16: 11
            This isn't a rhetorical question at all! The proceeds have been invested in a shield and sword to ensure real independence. And also in the technology and hardware for peaceful nuclear energy, which no one else in the world possesses to such a degree.
          2. P
            0
            8 May 2026 02: 35
            There is no single Russia that makes decisions and reaps the fruits of those decisions. Those who invest Russian oil revenues as their own reap remarkable profits, but when the assets acquired with these revenues are raided, the beneficiaries deploy military forces from a completely different Russia.
        2. 0
          April 11 2026 15: 06
          Quote: SAG
          How will this kafala turn out for this bunch of merchants with medieval thinking...

          This is a backup plan for the US; if the US fails to take control of Hormuz and/or Iranian oil, it will organize an "Arab Spring 2.0" in the Middle East; it will be a glorious hunt...
          1. SAG
            0
            April 11 2026 16: 15
            What's the point? Arab oil is the backing for the petrodollar and sold-out hundred-year futures. It's like shooting yourself in the foot.
            1. +1
              April 11 2026 18: 51
              Quote: SAG
              Arab oil is the material backing for the petrodollar

              Arab oil, gas, fertilizers (which the US has even without the Arabs), etc. are a breeding ground for the economies of US competitors from the EU and Asia Pacific countries.
              The US goal is to deprive its competitors of the Middle East's resources or at least control Hormuz via Oman. If the Arab monarchies disappear or become enlarged under Anglo-Saxon tutelage, the US and the British won't cry. As a result of the war, the Middle East map will inevitably change, and not in Iran's favor, among other things.
              1. SAG
                0
                April 11 2026 19: 20
                Resource extraction (production) and the financial system are different things, although interdependent (but again not linearly)
                at least control over Hormuz through Oman
                I wonder what will happen if (or rather, when) this minimum is not met...
                if the Arab monarchies disappear or become larger
                I wonder what this means? Will Arab republics emerge? It's hard to imagine... And at whose expense will they expand? They haven't even declared such goals themselves and aren't doing anything about it. The war in Yemen has long since lost that prospect...
                As a result of the war, the map of the Middle East will change in any case, and not in favor of the IRI, among other things.
                Absolutely not? How can you respond?
  4. +1
    April 12 2026 11: 29
    It's a very similar picture to what anyone involved in the construction industry in a certain northern country might see. But here, no one confiscates passports; they limit themselves to extortion so that the contractor and the official covering them can live comfortably and vacation in, say, Dubai.
  5. P
    0
    8 May 2026 02: 31
    "Capitalism with a human face" has an ass. Sometimes it's in the same country, sometimes in another, but it's here to stay as long as capitalism exists.