China has developed a "pistol" with a rate of fire of 2000 rounds per minute.

10 201 63
China has developed a "pistol" with a rate of fire of 2000 rounds per minute.

A Gauss gun electromagnetic pistol with a 30-centimeter barrel, one-handed operation, laser sight, and a removable rear magazine has been unveiled in China. It's not a firearm at all. weapon passed successful tests, during which a rate of fire of 1000 to 2000 rounds per minute was achieved.

The pistol's operating principle and design allow for adjustment of not only the rate of fire but also the power, allowing operators to reduce the energy level for non-lethal use and, potentially, incapacitate targets without causing fatal injuries. The new weapon, also known as the "Gauss Cannon," was developed by the state-owned China South Industries Group.



The pistol features a built-in display that shows battery status, ammunition count, and the selected firing mode. The detachable magazine is mounted behind the central grip, allowing the electromagnetic coil system to occupy more of the body and increase the projectile's acceleration range.

Military observer Zhang Xuefeng, in an interview with China Central Television (CCTV), talks about the new weapon:

With further increases in power and accuracy, such weapons could be used in military operations and, in some cases, replace conventional firearms.

Compared to previous test versions, the latest model of the pistol uses a slightly longer barrel and larger, heavier projectiles with greater kinetic energy. When fired, the Gauss gun produces no muzzle flash or smoke, operates with a low acoustic signature, and does not eject spent cartridges. This makes the weapon highly desirable for covert operations.

The Gauss cannon is reportedly designed primarily for non-lethal use, and its wider use in combat situations is limited by the current battery capacity. As battery technology advances, such weapon systems may find wider application in future military concepts and, in some cases, complement or replace conventional firearms.

Magnetic weapons are a type of electromagnetic projectile weapon that accelerate conductive projectiles to high speeds using magnetic fields generated by electric currents, without the use of chemical propellants or explosives. The two main types of such weapons are railguns and electromagnetic cannons, which utilize the Lorentz force—the interaction between magnetic fields and electric currents—to accelerate projectiles to hypersonic speeds, potentially offering advantages in range, safety, and cost compared to conventional firearms.

However, judging by the photograph of the target at which the pistol was fired, the new weapon is still experiencing accuracy issues. Or perhaps the tests weren't conducted by the most experienced shooter.

63 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    April 9 2026 20: 17
    Cool. When will it be on sale?
    1. SAG
      -4
      April 9 2026 20: 55
      Quote: awdrgy
      Cool. When will it be on sale?

      Do you want to buy this on the marketplace? fellow
      Yes, it's not a combat weapon, and it has no future in the army, not anytime soon. But it's still a weapon.
      I would advise our gunsmiths to develop a similar version of a hunting rifle and a miniature traumatic weapon capable of firing a couple of shots for self-defense.
      1. SAG
        +5
        April 9 2026 21: 06
        Another interesting concept for the distant future could be developed in conjunction with equipment. That is, the weapon would be connected to a powerful battery integrated into wearable clothing and equipped with a universal charger, including a solar panel. Increasing the barrel length would improve accuracy. The remaining issues remaining are weight and cost. fellow soldier
      2. 0
        April 10 2026 00: 08
        Probably a little later, when they improve the shot power, if I live to see those glorious times, of course, hehe. It should be cheaper on the marketplace, in theory. But there's no shooting range to check on the marketplaces. Buying a pig in a poke is a bit of a hassle. It has all those coils, a battery, and who knows how resistant it is to impacts and other influences. I think it should replace the small-bore rifle quite successfully in the future. They'll improve the shot power, it's just a matter of time, no matter what. A quiet shot and inexpensive ammunition, plus a terrific rate of fire... A very useful thresher should come out eventually.
        I don't think it's particularly suitable for self-defense in the long term, especially against animals—it doesn't make a loud noise and is generally overpowered. It's cheap for hunting, sure (in terms of shots), but it feels a bit inhumane. But for assault (with sufficient power, of course) or as a sniper rifle, it's perfect.
        1. SAG
          +1
          April 10 2026 11: 46
          I don't think it's particularly suitable for self-defense in the long term, especially against animals—it doesn't make a loud noise and is generally overpowered. It's cheap for hunting, sure (in terms of shots), but it feels a bit inhumane. But for assault (with sufficient power, of course) or as a sniper rifle, it's perfect.

          You should look at the statistics, in what percentage of cases are traumatic weapons used and purchased against animals))) made me smile))
          I don't understand anything about humaneness in hunting - apparently something from a parallel universe what
          And the stormtroopers will be very pleased when their battery dies during an assault; I think they'll compose a poem in gratitude, if they have time. A sniper will also be very pleased when, while sitting in ambush at -20°C, his battery fails within 24 hours (in reality, much sooner; the capacity drops by half, making it simply impossible to fire). good
          Thank you, you really lifted my spirits today. laughing
          1. 0
            April 10 2026 12: 57
            No, if they improve it, the battery won't die, because then it's not a weapon and there's nothing to discuss. And they will improve it, 100%. I don't know about the traumatic pistol and other non-weapons... I'm not interested and haven't read any, but for self-defense against animals, a long-barreled derringer with a large caliber 4 barrel is better (it's not a rifle and isn't suitable for hunting due to the barrel length). A powerful revolver is an alternative, but there are some nuances. A revolver shot is weaker and doesn't spread. It requires good skill to use. Buckshot is just that, buckshot, and some barrels can be loaded with heavy bullets. On the other hand, a revolver is versatile—it's a perfectly decent self-defense weapon against people, and partially against animals. Although an African buffalo has been killed once, those were professional hunters and the exception. There have also been cases of self-defense against bears, and in those cases, the person was injured, although he survived. This confirms that a revolver offers limited protection against large animals. Like a gas canister (which didn't stop a hungry bear), it doesn't offer a 100% guarantee when used correctly.
            Humane hunting means treating those hunting from helicopters with automatic weapons with the same care as the animals they kill. A self-respecting hunter would choose a double-barreled shotgun. It's fairer—the animal should have a chance.
            Have a good mood!
            1. SAG
              +3
              April 10 2026 13: 55
              I'm reading and I don't get the point, even though I understand every word individually. Where do you live, sir? I'm in Russia, in the Urals. What kind of helicopter hunting... What kind of revolvers... What kind of weapons are on marketplaces... At first I thought you were trolling me, blowing my farce out of proportion... Now I'm completely baffled!
              If they improve it, the battery won't die...
              What will they upgrade it to... the level of a nuclear power plant?
              Is humaneness when the same measures are applied to hunters as to the animals they kill? What kind of measures are these? Are the hunters shot?
              My brain is boiling from what I'm reading...
              1. The comment was deleted.
              2. 0
                April 10 2026 20: 38
                Ural, Russia... is this a geographic forum or a weapons forum? Or are you trying to compare weapons to their potential distribution geography? I'm not sure about that.
                150 years ago, airplanes were considered nonsense, or something like that. We don't yet know how far they'll go. If they knew, they'd have done it already.
                There are few "hunters" who can be shot from a helicopter.
                1. SAG
                  0
                  April 11 2026 00: 20
                  When asked a simple question—"Where are you from?"—you resort to a verbose approach. Geographical? Why not literary? There are words and punctuation marks here...
                  150 years ago, airplanes were considered nonsense, or something like that.

                  What you write will be considered nonsense!
                  The idea for a flying machine originated with Mozhaisky in 1856. The inventor began work on the project in the late 1860s. The design was completed by 1873.
                  In 1878, a special commission of the Main Engineering Directorate of the Ministry of War approved the allocation of 3 rubles to Mozhaisky for the development of the project.
                  In 1881, the inventor received the country's first patent—a "privilege"—for an "air-propelled projectile."
                  We don't know yet what they'll work on it to.

                  We know that the article describes a finished product.
                  Your fantasies have nothing to do with engineering. You haven't learned the basics, you don't know the theory, and you don't even understand the principles. But why do you put your stupidity on display for all to see?
                  Good luck
                  1. +1
                    April 11 2026 02: 45
                    Well, of course, most of the world's population knew about Mozhaisky and his project... That's logical.
                    "Your fantasies have nothing to do with engineering. You haven't learned the basics, you don't know the hardware, and you don't even understand the principles. But why are you putting your stupidity on display for all to see?"
                    How did you determine this? Do you have any information or facts about my knowledge, skills, and capabilities? Like, the basics, principles, and technical details?
                    As for the fantasies and other blah-blah-blah, I understand that you're drawing conclusions based on some data known only to you. At least, I don't recall ever stating my engineering expertise. Well, that's something that will pass with age, perhaps.
                    Why is the question "Where are you from?" so simple? It's not simple—it's stupid. Firstly, because it's irrelevant to the topic at hand, and secondly, because it's personal information (even if only a small portion of it). Incidentally, this is taught in Russian schools, as far as I've heard, in 9th or 10th grade, during a lesson on security and defense of the homeland (or something like that). And as a Russian, you should know about it. So, it turns out you don't know, which is strange, but who cares. I could have lied to you, of course, but what's the point?
      3. 0
        April 10 2026 15: 43
        Quote: SAG
        this version of a hunting rifle

        Is this like firing 60 bullets and hitting a moose once and only wounding it?

        Hunting is a gun.
        Precise, powerful, not hidden.

        Self-defense with a submachine gun? Well, I don't know.
        And a miniature traumatic weapon for a couple of shots is plenty.
        1. SAG
          -2
          April 11 2026 00: 08
          Is this like firing 60 bullets and hitting a moose once and only wounding it?

          By "version," did you mean a complete replica of the one in the picture with the new "hunting rifle" label? Please read the definition of what a rifle is before you start writing nonsense.
    2. +1
      April 10 2026 00: 20
      Quote: awdrgy
      Cool. When will it be on sale?

      The movie "Weapon" was released 15 years ago. Does anyone remember?
      According to the description, the Chinese new product is apparently made based on that film.
      At least the description fits.
      Well done Chinese, good work!
      1. 0
        April 10 2026 00: 33
        They're investing in science across all fields. It's clear they have a goal. They're working toward it; it's not a given they'll reach it, but their efforts are evident. It's all about energy.
        On the other hand, their society, where prohibition follows prohibition, and prohibition follows prohibition, is just so-so. It's socially doomed. Perhaps this is also a consequence of insufficient energy supply.
  2. 0
    April 9 2026 20: 20
    If a bullet weighs 9 grams, multiplied by 2000, then this pistol can fire 18 kg at an enemy in a minute... and in an hour, 18 multiplied by 60 equals 1080 kg... from a blow with such a mass, I wonder if anything will remain of the enemy... hi
    1. +4
      April 9 2026 20: 27
      Quote: Andrey Martov
      If a bullet weighs 9 grams, multiplied by 2000, then this pistol can fire 18 kg at an enemy in a minute... and in an hour, 18 multiplied by 60 equals 1080 kg... from a blow with such a mass, I wonder if anything will remain of the enemy... hi

      Can not.
      Because the practical rate of fire is much lower.
      Limited by magazine capacity, battery, resource, etc.
    2. +3
      April 9 2026 20: 41
      Quote: andrey martov
      This pistol can fire 18 kg of bullets at an enemy per minute.

      Did I miss something?
      The article mentions barrel length twice and magazine capacity not once.
      Another question: "control" or "use" with one hand? The PM is "use" of the weapon with one hand. And the Mosin rifle is "shooting with one hand," since firing it with one hand is a real circus act.
      And a little more. To guarantee a kill at close range, in the worst case scenario, you need 18 grams—three 9x18 bullets. Let's say five—30 grams. Why does this contraption need such a high rate of fire? Even if it's adjustable.

      Although, as a concept, a toy is very, very useful. Concept cars almost never make it into production. But if even 5-10% of the concepts and ideas from a concept make it to production, that's a very significant achievement in terms of modernizing a production car.
      It's probably the same here. The main thing is the idea and a working prototype. As for how to perfect it, the Chinese will have to figure it out.
      1. +5
        April 9 2026 21: 33
        Quote: Zoldat_A
        The article mentions barrel length twice and magazine capacity not once.

        Igor, welcome! hi
        Indeed, there's no data on these parameters. I did some digging online, and all I found was a little information on a previous Chinese design with a 12cm barrel.
        For comparison, consider data from another Chinese electromagnetic pistol prototype, developed at the Naval Engineering University in Wuhan. This device had a muzzle energy of up to 150 joules with a 12-centimeter barrel. This figure is comparable to that of small-caliber firearms. However, this relates to a different project, and its parameters may differ from those of the China South Industries Group model.

        For comparison, I found
        The approximate muzzle energy of the TOZ-1 shot is 94–133 J, the most probable value is 110–120 J.

        The article discusses weapons with a 30cm barrel, i.e., with much greater firing energy.
        In short, if the Chinese are telling the truth, a prototype silent and flameless automatic weapon has been born, with a lethality greater than that of a 5,6mm small-bore rifle and a generous magazine capacity. These are no longer toys. And the fact that the Chinese have kept the performance characteristics under wraps suggests that work to perfect them is well underway. hi
        1. +3
          April 9 2026 22: 20
          hi!
          Quote: Polite Elk
          In short, if the Chinese are telling the truth, a prototype silent and flameless automatic weapon has been born, with a lethality greater than that of a 5,6mm small-bore rifle and a generous magazine capacity. These are no longer toys. And the fact that the Chinese have kept the performance characteristics under wraps suggests that work to perfect them is well underway.

          Moreover, drones have gone from children's toys to effective weapons VERY quickly. Faster than airplanes. What this toy will be like in 10 years is anyone's guess. A 12 cm barrel with 150 joules is practically a PSM. I've even held it in my hands – at point-blank range, it's a real pain for an enemy.
          One can only hope that our "Kulibins" are also awake. Although, as usual, it's still a long way off until they're widely adopted...
          1. +3
            April 9 2026 23: 19
            Quote: Zoldat_A
            Although, as usual, before mass implementation, there will be a lot of back and forth...

            With a fly swatter on the bald, bronzed heads of the generals preparing for the past war.
            1. +2
              April 10 2026 00: 21
              Quote: Polite Moose
              Quote: Zoldat_A
              Although, as usual, before mass implementation, there will be a lot of back and forth...

              With a fly swatter on the bald, bronzed heads of the generals preparing for the past war.

              I didn't actually mean fly swatters. But I like your idea better, Alexander... good laughing
              1. +3
                April 10 2026 07: 47
                Quote: Zoldat_A
                But I like your option better, Alexander...

                Unfortunately, this isn't my solution, it's OURs. We have plenty of Kulibiny types, but their creations often die on the vine because of the blockheads and bribe-takers in the circles making decisions about launching production. And then some deputy's billion-dollar property gets confiscated (it's lucky if it gets confiscated). So, a fly swatter is a very gentle way to influence the situation. hi
                1. +2
                  April 10 2026 11: 45
                  hi!
                  Quote: Polite Elk
                  Alas, this isn't my solution, it's OURs. We have plenty of Kulibins, but their creations often die on the vine because of the blockheads and bribe-takers in the circles that make decisions about launching production.

                  Moreover, as I understand it, the name I.P. Kulibin has become a household word not only because of the inventor's unique personality, but also as a symbol of unrealized projects. Just look at the wooden arch bridge!
                  Century they go, but NOTHING changes.
        2. -1
          April 10 2026 06: 57
          than the small-bore
          Well, it was never a serious weapon.
          1. +3
            April 10 2026 07: 53
            Quote: Normann
            Well, it was never a serious weapon.

            How to say...
            The Russian 5,6mm SV-99 sniper rifle is a small-caliber weapon designed for specialized missions by special forces units, as well as for target practice and target shooting.
    3. 0
      April 10 2026 00: 03
      From the impact of such a mass, nothing will remain of our own people.
      and in an hour 18 multiplied by 60 will give 1080 kg.

      Loading more than a ton of iron onto a living person...
  3. +2
    April 9 2026 20: 22
    The problem for hand-held automatic weapons is not to increase the rate of fire, but to decrease it.
    1. +1
      April 9 2026 21: 18
      The conversation should be about optimizing weapons, their parameters and all other aspects.
  4. amr
    +1
    April 9 2026 20: 25
    Quote: Andrey Martov
    If the bullet weighs 9 grams

    but it doesn't say 9 grams, it could very well be 1 gram balls, the shot is most likely with those "balls", as I understand it, and the barrel is not rifled))
    Just the thing for the police and the Russian National Guard!
  5. +1
    April 9 2026 20: 25
    What is the firing range?
    1. +3
      April 9 2026 20: 35
      Quote: Archer
      What is the firing range?

      4 市丈 2 步 3 市尺 5 市寸
      (4 zhang 2 bu 3 chi 5 cun)
      1. +6
        April 9 2026 20: 40
        How much is that in cubits and spans? . . . hi
        1. SAG
          +6
          April 9 2026 21: 10
          This gun doesn't shoot in the elbows because it's Chinese! Only for Jans. To shoot in the elbows, you need to buy a Russian adapter.
        2. +2
          April 9 2026 21: 26
          About 43 cubits or 101 spans
      2. +6
        April 9 2026 21: 09
        4 zhang 2 bu 3 chi 5 cun
        AI gives that 4 zhang = 4 × 3,2 m = 12,8 m;
        2 bu (bu was equal to a double step, at different times it could have 5 or 6 chi) = 2 × 1,66 m = 3,32 m;
        3 chi = 3 × 0,34 m = 1,02 m;
        5 cun = 5 × 0,0333 m ≈ 0,167 m.
        Total: 12,8 m + 3,32 m + 1,02 m + 0,167 m = 17,327 m.
        Or about 150-180 parrots. laughing
        1. +2
          April 10 2026 06: 58
          And how much is that in monkeys?
          1. +3
            April 10 2026 07: 19
            1 boa constrictor is about the same as 4 monkeys... if I remember correctly...
          2. +2
            April 10 2026 11: 31
            Quote: Normann
            And how much is that in monkeys?
            I don't know. They spin so much, it's hard to count. But in elephants (African ones), well... there are probably two.
  6. +1
    April 9 2026 20: 44
    2000 isn't enough; you need at least a 9000-round magazine. Given the unclear state of Chinese materials science, why claim such nonsense? Anyone who's fired more than a couple of 60-round RPK magazines knows.
    1. +3
      April 9 2026 20: 53
      9000 pellets, even 1 gram each, equals 9 kilograms, just for ammunition. What a pistol, perfect for one-handed practice. And a battery in the backpack, too. laughing
      And the barrel is probably made of silumin or plastic, otherwise how will the electromagnetic field work with an iron barrel.
      1. 0
        April 9 2026 21: 04
        What if you shoot the Macedonian way? It's twice as easy. laughing
    2. SAG
      +5
      April 9 2026 21: 16
      Hey, where are you going? Take the batteries for the gadget!
      1. +1
        April 10 2026 10: 01
        I did some calculations here. Let's say the shot energy (as noted above) is 150 kJ and the conversion efficiency is 100%. That's 150 kW per second or 42 Vh*hFor comparison, the capacity of a typical smartphone battery is 15-20 Wh, meaning one shot drains two such batteries completely. Up to 2000 bullets per minute, they said? :))) Okay, let's say the pistol is powered by some external network, but let's reduce the efficiency to 50%. Then, firing 2000 shots would require 2000 * 150 kJ * 2 (efficiency) = 600 MJ, or in more familiar units - 166 kWh or 1 MW per 1 minute (considering that this amount of pew-pew is produced in 1 minute). Half will go to losses, most of the remaining 0.5 MW*m will go to heating.
        Conclusion: Awesome heater, unless the Chinese have invented a high-temperature superconductor.
        1. +1
          April 10 2026 10: 57
          I think they fired no more than a dozen bullets, then multiplied them and got a huge ammunition supply and rate of fire.
          1. 0
            April 10 2026 11: 24
            Quote: ideo098
            I think they fired no more than a dozen bullets, then multiplied them and got a huge ammunition supply and rate of fire.
            That's what many people do :)))
  7. +3
    April 9 2026 21: 02
    A joke comes to mind. They're hiring a typist, and the interview goes:
    - What is your typing speed?
    - 2000 characters per minute!
    Executives:
    - Well, well!!!
    Typist (to the side):
    - This is the kind of crap that happens...
  8. +2
    April 9 2026 21: 10
    Judging by the photo of the target at which the pistol was fired, the new weapon is currently experiencing accuracy issues. Or perhaps the tests were conducted by an inexperienced shooter.

    Judging by the target, whoever stood in its place would definitely be a corpse, and repeatedly. In my opinion, with a rate of fire of 2000 rounds per minute and working at close range, aiming to the millimeter is pointless; maintaining aim at the center of the target is sufficient. winked
    1. +1
      April 10 2026 10: 59
      The paper target was badly damaged, it's noticeable. The holes aren't small, which means the pellet isn't like a pellet, but larger. It would have more air resistance, a shorter range, and less killing power... And it's unclear from what distance the paper target was shot.
      1. 0
        April 10 2026 11: 43
        Quote: ideo098
        This means the bullet isn't like a pellet, but is larger in size, which means it has more air resistance, a shorter range, and less killing power... And it's not clear from what distance they were shooting at the paper target.

        Judging by the bullet holes, the bullets are quite powerful. Otherwise, it's a close-combat weapon, and according to the article, its power is adjusted depending on the task at hand, so the enemy is either slightly dead or slightly maimed. Given its size and characteristics, it should be a good weapon for use in built-up areas, quiet, and quite lethal.
        1. 0
          April 10 2026 12: 53
          They haven't presented the plywood target riddled with bullets yet; apparently something went wrong. And paper doesn't give you any change.
          1. 0
            April 10 2026 14: 14
            Quote: ideo098
            They haven't presented the plywood target riddled with bullets yet; apparently something went wrong. And paper doesn't give you any change.

            The power is manually adjusted there. Maybe that's why the plywood didn't get smashed, so you don't have to change the target base after each shooting. request
  9. KCA
    +3
    April 9 2026 21: 54
    2000 rounds per minute is good, but how many shots will it take for the electrodes to burn out? Will it even last as long as an AK magazine? And I don't see any kind of cooling system, not even a basic heatsink. The PK has a rate of fire of 650 rounds per minute, but if you fire an entire magazine of 200 rounds without stopping, the barrel will fall off like a winter crop. It's replaceable and can be replaced quickly, but what about this toy?
  10. 0
    April 9 2026 22: 48
    At this rate of ammunition consumption, this device would also require a truckload of ammunition. The prototype of the future is engineer Garin's hyperboloid; the question is, what principles...
  11. +1
    April 9 2026 23: 08
    A rate of fire of 1000 to 2000 rounds per minute was achieved.

    A wheelbarrow of bullets is included.
    operates with a low acoustic signature

    So the sound threshold isn't being crossed, then? Like, subsonic speed?
  12. +3
    April 10 2026 01: 41
    The idea immediately comes to mind of using them to destroy FPV drones instead of shotguns or loading AKs with multi-bullet rounds. Accuracy and range can be achieved by lengthening the barrel (and thus the electromagnetic coil), and the ability to adjust the accuracy is also interesting.
  13. +1
    April 10 2026 04: 37
    As I understand it, we are seeing a prototype of a weapon from science fiction novels called a "needler"....
  14. +2
    April 10 2026 06: 31
    I looked at a new model of electromagnetic pistol: its bullets have changed from the previous "coins" to "steel rods." The news reports say this weapon can switch between lethal and non-lethal modes. Perhaps it would be worth trying it out for police use first, or as a replacement for a hunting rifle?
    1. +2
      April 10 2026 09: 23
      For police purposes, stopping power (large caliber, heavy bullet) and the absence of ricochets (soft bullet, low muzzle velocity) are important. For military purposes, the following are important: firing range (high muzzle velocity), penetration (hard bullet), and ammunition capacity (small caliber).
      The goals do not coincide.
    2. 0
      April 10 2026 15: 48
      There are legal problems there.
      There is no gunpowder trace.
      It is probably not clear which barrel was used to fire.
      There is no noise (it comes out hidden).

      That is, there could be gunfire 5 meters away from you, and you wouldn’t even know it.
      A criminal's dream and a serviceman's nightmare.

      And don't tell me about mufflers.
      They often require other cartridges, which are purchased separately and still need to be obtained.
      And if this becomes widespread, it'll be available like a regular machine gun. Who knows how, but they do get it, judging by the news.
  15. 0
    April 10 2026 08: 09
    However, judging by the photograph of the target at which the pistol was fired, the new weapon is still experiencing accuracy issues. Or perhaps the tests weren't conducted by the most experienced shooter.

    This is most likely a prototype of a smoothbore weapon and shoots balls.
    That's why there is a wide range.
  16. 0
    April 10 2026 09: 13
    Where's the power rating? Maybe the pellets hit a little harder than the Nerf blaster.
  17. +1
    April 10 2026 10: 12
    China has developed a "pistol" with a rate of fire of 2000 rounds per minute.
    If it truly delivers 150 J, then a 3,2V x 3Ah battery will be enough for 3-4 shots at 4% efficiency. The 6g bullet velocity will be 223 m/s, and the instantaneous (2,6 ms) power of the acceleration system, without taking into account its efficiency, is 27,8 kW. At 300V, the current in the coil system will be 92A.
    So, to fire at a rate of 2000 rounds per minute, a 300 V, 2,7 kW converter needs to be built into the pistol and about 2 kW of heat needs to be removed from the entire system. All this is assuming 100% efficiency of this unit.
    What I'm getting at is that there's no need to fantasize about a hurricane of fire from such a system. It can generate a couple of bullets per minute at that level of energy, but for anything more, it needs a power plant.
  18. The comment was deleted.
  19. 0
    April 11 2026 16: 47
    I just read the title of the article and the first question that came to mind was: why do you need a 2000 rounds per minute pistol?
    And there in the article it’s like about Star Wars