Ground-based RTK "Omich" in combat conditions

9 266 21
Ground-based RTK "Omich" in combat conditions
The Omich RTK with passengers and driver on board. Photo by OABII


In December 2025, Defense Minister Andrei Belousov announced that three modifications of the Omsk robotic platform had been tested by the Ulyanovsk Guards Airborne Forces unit from the Dnepr group. Prior to this, in August 2024, the family was first presented at the Army-2024 forum. The developers were the Omsk Armored Engineering Institute, and the manufacturer was OmVent LLC (NPO RENG LLC).



Let's take a closer look at what this vehicle is and why the paratroopers needed it.

A platform that fits in half a meter


The Omich-2 is the main modification delivered to the troops. It's a compact tracked robot weighing 375 kg and standing just 450 mm tall. For comparison, that's lower than a typical desk. The designers removed the bulky fenders, made the body more compact, and the vehicle became lower and more stable.

The powertrain is fully electric: two 3 kW motors, each driving its own track, and a 48-volt, 180-ampere-hour battery. The range is 15 to 25 kilometers, depending on conditions. The payload capacity is 350 kg, and it can tow up to 500 kg.


An experienced Omsk soldier fires a grenade launcher. Photo: VOIR / OABII

There's also a larger version—the first-generation Omich. It weighs 650 kg, features a T-shaped hull with prominent fenders, and can reach speeds of up to 30 km/h with a range of up to 20 km.

Both platforms are electric. This is no accident. According to a NRTK instructor with the Southern Group of Forces, call sign "Perevodchik," quoted by the Rossiya 24 television channel, the electric motor provides a low thermal and noise signature—critically important on the front lines. Its small size and low profile make it difficult to detect and engage.

Control is remote, via a control panel with a video monitor. But the Omich has a unique feature: an additional control station right on board—a column with handles. Essentially, the robot can transport people, and if the communication channels fail, the driver will mount the platform and drive himself.

This makes the vehicle "optionally piloted" - a hybrid of a robot and a miniature all-terrain vehicle.


Another variant of the Omsk platform. These chassis are used for mounting weapons. Photo: VOIR / OABII

Modifications: from medic to flamethrower


The Omich family is not a single machine, but a whole line of platforms for different tasks.

The Omič-Ogonyok is a transport variant with a cargo platform and low sides. It transports ammunition, provisions, assault teams, and the wounded from the battlefield.


A RTK as a transport for paratroopers. Photo: Russian Ministry of Defense

The Omsk-Shmel is a combat modification with a launcher for four RPO-A Shmel rocket flamethrowers and a protective mesh screen.

The Omich-2 can be equipped with: anti-tank missile Kornet and Fagot systems, the AGS-17 automatic grenade launcher, and heavy machine guns. A 10-rail launcher was on display at the exhibition.

A separate modification is the Omich-Vodomet: a tracked platform with a water jet propulsion system that independently crosses water obstacles, including against the current.


The Omich-Vodomet floating platform. Photo by OABII.

Three mines and the vehicle is back in action.


The most revealing testimony from the combat zone is the story of a soldier from the 77th separate motorized rifle regiment of the "South" group, call sign Lev, reported by the Russia 24 television channel.

According to him, one of the Omsk vehicles hit mines three times and continued to operate after being repaired.
"The operator doesn't need to be in dangerous terrain during the delivery. Naturally, we're not risking human lives, but rather equipment," noted soldier Lev.


An instructor with the call sign "Translator" confirmed that the Omich-2's main advantage over the first version is its reinforced batteries and engine, which allow the vehicle to better navigate off-road conditions: swamps, potholes, and even float on water.


Models of the Omsk aircraft in various configurations. Photo by VOIR

***
The Omich is an example of an approach gaining momentum in the Russian defense industry: simple, inexpensive to manufacture and repair, equipment that can be mass-produced and repaired in the field. The electric powertrain eliminates expensive and complex components. The tracks are rubber, and the undercarriage consists of five road wheels per side with a balance beam and spring suspension.

Robots are no longer laboratory prototypes. They navigate trenches, transport the wounded, and, according to military personnel, can withstand explosions. How this technology will develop further depends both on combat experience and on how quickly production can ramp up.
21 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    April 9 2026 05: 01
    How this area will develop further depends both on the experience of combat use and on how quickly production can increase.
    And off we go
    1. -2
      April 9 2026 06: 44
      We need to add range, the ability to tow a cart, and a gasoline-powered version. A version without remote control should be made to increase the load capacity. A tracked quad is a good idea.
      1. +3
        April 10 2026 08: 25
        New is a well-forgotten old...
  2. +1
    April 9 2026 05: 04
    I'm all for it. But why is it a robot? Does it only have remote control? Or can it return on its own? Or can it travel to the medical battalion on its own?
  3. +6
    April 9 2026 06: 30
    The range is from 15 to 25 kilometers depending on the conditions
    So, you should immediately aim for 15 km, and even that's not a given. This dog, on a leash, won't go far, and it needs infrastructure—it needs to be transported to and from the LBS on a trailer, and it needs a powerful generator to charge the batteries. The question is, why the hell would a goat need a replica? Just another show-related innovation.
    1. 0
      April 9 2026 16: 56
      Quote: faiver
      that is, you should immediately aim for 15 km, etc.

      25 km is a perfectly flat highway with an ideal battery and ideal vehicle condition.
      15km is rough terrain, but everything else is perfect.

      In reality, IMO, you should aim for a range of about 7 kilometers. And in this regard, the wheeled version is certainly superior. Although tracks offer greater load capacity and maneuverability, the troops currently have generators; that's not the main issue. It's unclear whether quick battery replacement is possible; for such a short range, it's absolutely necessary.

      Overall, delivery robots are desperately needed in the LBS. Battery-powered ones are especially important, as they're quieter and less visible to drones through infrared cameras. However, in my opinion, wheeled options are still preferable. Yes
  4. 0
    April 9 2026 07: 48
    ...what a bummer. Right, we'll soon be switching to horses... A homemade machine in a garage is being discussed with the Minister of Defense. fool
    1. +2
      April 9 2026 08: 40
      Well, "cheap and cheerful" is still a thing, but 15-20 km, an electric motor, etc.? It seems like this "donkey" turned out to be a bit pricey (they're modestly keeping quiet about the cost, even an approximate one).
    2. +5
      April 9 2026 09: 25
      That's right, we'll switch to horses soon.

      Have you heard anything about the runners at SVO? There are horses, donkeys, mules, and all sorts of other contraptions. It's even acknowledged on a federal channel (Russia 2), with Solovyov in the studio, as a cartopolov, if I'm not mistaken.
      1. 0
        April 9 2026 10: 01
        Quote: T-100
        That's right, we'll switch to horses soon.

        Have you heard anything about the runners at SVO? There are horses, donkeys, mules, and all sorts of other contraptions. It's even acknowledged on a federal channel (Russia 2), with Solovyov in the studio, as a cartopolov, if I'm not mistaken.

        Of course I heard...
      2. 0
        April 10 2026 11: 24
        In 2001, a US Special Forces unit used horses to move through enemy territory in Afghanistan.
    3. +3
      April 9 2026 09: 31
      We'll switch to horses soon

      "...the commander of the special forces unit "Storm," call sign Khan, told the Russia Today television channel at the training ground of the 9th Motorized Rifle Brigade (now the 51st Army). His soldiers are learning horseback riding: it is believed that horses, thanks to their instincts, are less likely to step on a mine, are better able to navigate in the dark, and are capable of navigating off-road conditions.
      The tactic involves two men riding on a single horse: one driving, the other providing fire cover. Upon arriving at the assault site, both soldiers dismount and proceed to take the next enemy stronghold. https://www.kommersant.ru/doc/8079519
      On the subject
      The range is from 15 to 25 kilometers, depending on conditions. ... Control is remote, via a control panel with a video monitor.
      The main question is: how do I control this Omsk helicopter? By radio, and over what range?
      1. 0
        April 9 2026 11: 32
        The tactics involve two people operating on one horse: one controls the horse, the other provides fire cover.
        - And does the second horse carry food for the horse? bully
        1. +1
          April 9 2026 21: 21
          Who's grazing that horse there all day?! The goal is the same: deliver ammunition and supplies as close as possible and then quickly escape, picking up the wounded. And that's right, 30 kilometers from zero. Generally, batteries are usually recharged further away from the LBS. You need to think a little. If people don't go out into the open there, where do you think a horse would be permanently parked there?!
          1. 0
            April 10 2026 02: 21
            How will a wounded man ride a horse?
  5. 0
    April 9 2026 21: 28
    In 2011, I wrote that a combat robot is a smartphone on a scooter with a machine gun. The smartphone in this equation is the communications system, the camera, and the brains (software, electronics, accelerometer, navigation, etc.).

    So far, I see that our people can't make a combat robot. I could have done it back in 2011... But not the kind Shoigu and Rogozin envisioned in their fantasies.
  6. 0
    April 9 2026 21: 38
    What's worse than the perversion in the photo of Belarus with a tractor trailer? Or a UAZ?
  7. +2
    April 9 2026 23: 41
    What's the speed of movement? What's the range of the remote controls? How many units are in operation? What's the cost of such equipment?
    1. 0
      April 10 2026 21: 13
      Quote: AlexisT
      What is the range of the remote controls?

      The main question, however, is that after Starlink was blocked, all these self-propelled vehicles stopped working. The radio range is simply indecently low, and they have practically no satellites of their own.
  8. 0
    April 13 2026 17: 05
    There was a Soviet LUAZ—a front-line transporter, on wheels, with incredible off-road capability. And a lower profile, with a folding steering column. So, make it a hybrid, recharge it, and drive on battery power. And duplicate the servo controls—both autonomous and manual.
  9. 0
    April 13 2026 19: 14
    What about a ground-based kamikaze, for example? It can be heavily loaded and "hidden"—it can bide its time. Not to mention expanding its capabilities, at least with a smokescreen to cover the attackers. And the question is, why don't they cover the weapons with at least a couple of centimeters of protection? Elements from, say, body armor. Otherwise, any bullet would neutralize its weapons.