Yars missiles are learning to survive as missile forces practice defense against drones in Siberia.

4 647 25
Yars missiles are learning to survive as missile forces practice defense against drones in Siberia.


Rocket The Strategic Forces completed command and staff exercises in Siberia, the Ministry of Defense reported on April 2. The maneuvers involved 15P155M Yars ground-mobile missile systems from one of the units stationed in the region. There were no practice missile launches; instead, they focused on deploying, dispersing, and protecting columns.



The main element is protection from drones


According to the Ministry of Defense, Yars crews practiced dispersed movements and changing field positions. Along the route, the columns had to traverse areas of simulated contaminated terrain. After leaving the radioactive contamination zone, radiation, chemical, and biological defense units conducted a full decontamination of the equipment. These same units used aerosol screens to camouflage the columns of large vehicles.

Engineering equipment was deployed and camouflage systems were used at the positions. Air attack threat alerts were issued in coordination with units and formations of the Central Military District, indicating a scale that extended beyond a single unit.


The key theme of the exercises was countering modern air attack weapons, including DronesAccording to the scenario, a simulated enemy used UAVs to attack missile systems. Security units had to respond to the full range of threats.

The army was deployed for aerial reconnaissance of routes, search and detection of saboteurs Aviation and various types of UAVs. According to the Ministry of Defense, this made it possible to detect simulated sabotage and reconnaissance groups on the distant approaches to field positions and neutralize them before the convoys arrived.

The adaptation does not appear to be accidental. According to Army Recognition, Yars crews were already using reconnaissance systems during the December 2025 exercises. drones "Eileron" for route control. Anti-drone defense training is becoming a core part of the Strategic Missile Forces' combat training.

Yars in the weapons system


Serial deliveries of the systems began in 2009–2010. In the spring of 2011, the first regiment, fully equipped with Yars systems, began combat duty. By the end of 2023, the Strategic Missile Forces command announced the completion of the mobile group's re-equipment—the new 15P155M systems had completely replaced the Topol family systems. Simultaneously, procurement of silo-based 15P165M variants is underway.


According to The National Interest, Russia has approximately 200 Yars missiles in service. The system is capable of striking targets at ranges of over 11,000 kilometers. The missile is armed with a multiple reentry vehicle (MIRV) with three warheads, each with a yield of approximately 200 kilotons, and is equipped with missile defense penetration devices. Its cruise speed reaches Mach 25.

The last Yars launch took place in October 2025 as part of strategic nuclear forces exercises. The missile was launched from the Plesetsk test site, with the simulated target located at the Kura test site in Kamchatka.


The foreign press is reacting to the exercises with noticeable attention.


Reuters described the Siberian maneuvers as part of regular practice aimed at testing combat readiness and "sending warning signals to the West at a time of high tensions over the war in Ukraine."

The British Daily Mail headlined its article:
Russia Deploys Terrifying Intercontinental Missile for Nuclear Exercises

— an emotional presentation, typical of a tabloid, without detailed military-technical assessments.

The National Interest called the Yars one of the most advanced ICBMs in the world. The publication's author, Brandon Weichert, stated:
"With such a system in their arsenal, the Russians can ensure that NATO will think carefully before pushing the Kremlin too hard."


Weichert points out that NATO lacks mobile land-based intercontinental ballistic missiles—the US relies on silo-based Minuteman III missiles, protected by concrete and a dispersed command structure. The West's advantage lies in submarines armed with Trident II D5 missiles. Russia's advantage with the Yars missile is its land mobility, which makes it difficult for an adversary to launch a disarming first strike.

Army Recognition notes that Siberia is being used as a training ground for a reason: the vast distances, forest cover, and extreme weather conditions complicate surveillance. The publication emphasizes that despite the war in Ukraine, Russia's nuclear forces are funded and trained under a separate program. Western analysts, according to the publication, view the exercises not as preparation for escalation, but as a demonstration of a guaranteed retaliatory strike.


Prospects


Yars missiles, in both mobile and silo-based configurations, remain the backbone of Russia's ground-based strategic nuclear forces. Together with the Sarmat heavy missile and the Avangard hypersonic pod, they form the modern nuclear triad.

The possibility of modernizing these systems has been repeatedly reported. According to various reports, Russia is also developing the advanced Kedr missile system, which is intended to replace the Yars missiles, in both mobile and silo-based versions. However, the transition to the new equipment is likely to begin in the 1930s. Until then, the Yars missiles will remain in service and continue to perform their assigned missions.
25 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    April 9 2026 05: 43
    Cool! We're proud! And what's going on in Ust-Luga?
    1. +5
      April 9 2026 06: 11
      Well, the VGK stubbornly pretends nothing happened. The systematic destruction of enemy UAVs by our refineries, ports, and oil storage facilities is underway. But Telegram won, the legendary heroes. Well done.
    2. +2
      April 9 2026 13: 35
      So they sent a special warning to the Balts, now they're shaking with fear. wassat
  2. +7
    April 9 2026 07: 19
    According to the Ministry of Defense, Yars crews practiced movement with dispersal and changing field positions.

    "Field," roughly speaking. All positions are known and monitored from space; the mobile ground-based missile systems have not traveled beyond their initial locations.
    1. 0
      April 12 2026 10: 29
      Who told you such nonsense? I'm talking about "Fields," tentatively.
      1. 0
        April 12 2026 10: 33
        Quote: colonel
        Who told you such nonsense? I'm talking about "Fields," tentatively.

        You can check the route on Google Maps. It's not a secret.
  3. +3
    April 9 2026 08: 29
    Army aviation and various types of UAVs were deployed to conduct aerial reconnaissance of routes and search for and detect saboteurs. According to the Ministry of Defense, this made it possible to detect simulated sabotage and reconnaissance groups on the distant approaches to field positions and neutralize them before the convoys arrived.

    Modern compact sabotage drones can be used from a distance of 30 km or even further. It's doubtful they can detect a couple of people within a 60-km radius, especially considering they don't even need to be sitting on an open surface. And relatively minor damage is enough to turn the launch of such a missile into a game of Russian roulette. The emerging drone threat demands a serious rethinking of the combat sustainability of the Strategic Missile Forces' mobile systems.
    1. +4
      April 9 2026 09: 19
      Modern compact sabotage drones can be used from a distance of 30 km or even further. It's doubtful they can detect a couple of people within a 60-km radius, especially considering they don't even need to be sitting on an open surface. And relatively minor damage is enough to turn the launch of such a missile into a game of Russian roulette. The emerging drone threat demands a serious rethinking of the combat sustainability of the Strategic Missile Forces' mobile systems.

      There's a photo in the article: a PGRK covering a BTR-80 (IMHO), obviously with the most powerful anti-drone weaponry!
      Everything is reliably camouflaged against the snow with green paint, and the Russian flag attached to the vehicle is likely used for the "friend or foe" system! A soldier with a yellow and red flag is fully equipped with camouflage!
      And note: "Over the past decade, the combat capabilities of the Strategic Missile Forces have been enhanced through rearmament. The military has received systems with improved characteristics.
      "Today, their share is approximately 90 percent, which reliably ensures a prompt response to military threats now and in the future," Karakayev said.
      , - the report says. https://lenta.ru/news/2025/12/17/raskryta-dolya-sovremennyh-raket-v-rvsn/
      1. +1
        April 9 2026 12: 08
        It would be nice if it were truly true, "obviously—with powerful anti-drone weapons!" But I'm not so sure. In general, in my opinion, such equipment, with such powerful weapons, in today's reality shouldn't be moving without powerful anti-drone protection. If we don't yet have such reliable and maneuverable systems, then we urgently need to establish their production. Saboteurs could theoretically launch UAVs from our own territory. The enemy never sleeps.
    2. 0
      April 10 2026 09: 39
      Unfortunately, at this point in time, no one can say with certainty whether such exercises will address most of the potential threats posed by UAVs. This type of weaponry is advancing and changing so rapidly that it's impossible to anticipate every possible threat. However, it's encouraging that work in this direction is underway.
  4. +2
    April 9 2026 08: 34
    In light of the development of UAVs, mobile complexes appear to be quite vulnerable. The US once considered deploying a mobile complex underground with several launch silos. It's expensive, but at least it's guaranteed to disable a UAV, not just a cheap UAV, but several warheads, and even then, the result isn't guaranteed.
    1. 0
      April 10 2026 09: 44
      We can look at China's experience, which is building hundreds of missile silos—try to determine which is real and which is fake. And in this missile deployment scenario, the threat from UAVs can only be considered from the perspective of the security of the resource-supplying periphery.
  5. 0
    April 9 2026 10: 38
    PGRKs have a right to exist, but not as the basis of the land-based strategic nuclear forces. Silos, rail-mobile missile systems, PGRKs for land-based ICBMs, tow trucks disguised as "Pyaterochka" and "Magnet" missiles... with intermediate-range nuclear weapons.
    And yes, these exercises are just for show, without the protection of powerful EMP systems, it's a sham. The Strategic Missile Forces have the Listva system for mines, now they need to make one for UAVs too, including fiber-optic ones. They'll have it in 10-15 years, I'm 100% sure. So stop panicking!
  6. -1
    April 9 2026 11: 14
    And any UAVs are not a threat to silo installations, but it is high time to abandon mobile strategic complexes (ground-based) - they are very expensive and vulnerable
  7. +1
    April 9 2026 11: 58
    Yars missiles are learning to survive as missile forces practice defense against drones in Siberia.

    This expression "learning to survive" is strange, not to win, not to deliver devastating blows, etc. Alas, this is the essence of our entire military doctrine today: not to win, but to survive.
    1. 0
      April 10 2026 09: 52
      An interesting question. A truly interesting one... It's a question of strategic goals. If you're asking about "survival" and not something more, then you simply don't have the resources or... the desire for anything more.
  8. 0
    April 9 2026 13: 39
    I wonder if anyone has tried painting the systems to match the terrain to camouflage them from satellite reconnaissance? Considering the system's cost, it would be possible to install LCD displays on top that would show the terrain image directly from the camera, and that would cost about 1% of the total price. But they couldn't even afford white paint. request
  9. NSV
    0
    April 9 2026 18: 47
    In fact, the photo doesn't even show an 80, but a BTR-70... Although specialized anti-sabotage escort vehicles have been produced for missile divisions for a long time now.
  10. -1
    April 9 2026 23: 28
    The mobile version of the system is extremely vulnerable to drones, both during storage and deployment. The silo-based version clearly has advantages in terms of resistance to saboteurs and drones, as well as in terms of launch preparation time.
  11. +1
    April 10 2026 01: 25
    We need to make aerostats, even the simplest ones, in the form of large inflatable pilot balloons. This can be done quickly. They can be used to raise barrier nets. Don't the people responsible for the country's defense understand this yet? It's an old-fashioned method, but it's effective.
    1. 0
      April 10 2026 03: 22
      And are we supposed to "wrap" all of Russia's borders in such nonsense?! That's utter nonsense. We need to fight the "cause," not the "effect," and not run around Russia hunting Ukrainian drones... request
  12. 0
    April 10 2026 07: 46
    The article discussed defense against the threat of drone attacks, not defense against drone attacks themselves, which is the most likely scenario. Our academics are still scratching their heads.
    1. 0
      April 10 2026 19: 19
      Quote: Plowman
      The academics are scratching their heads for now.

      It seems they're messing around; the defense problem needs to be solved once and for all, and not just against drones. Ground-based mobile installations and silos are easy to detect from space, but if a missile is placed in a container and placed on the bottom of an inland body of water or at sea (near its shore) and connected to the shore by a cable, then detection becomes incredibly difficult, especially if there's ice on the water's surface. To launch a missile, on command from the shore, the container sheds ballast, assumes a vertical position, and rises with a blow, breaking through the ice. Then, the launch takes place. The container can easily be periodically lifted for inspection and relocation.
  13. The comment was deleted.
    1. 0
      14 May 2026 07: 36
      There is no need to distort the Russian language to suit superstitions.
  14. 0
    14 May 2026 07: 35
    Now that the START Treaty is no longer in force, a couple hundred self-propelled replicas should be built to protect the Yars. Inside, they could house warehouses, workshops, housing, and even bathhouses for the soldiers. Such a large number of decoys would significantly increase the survivability of the systems. Let the enemy guess: which is a billion-dollar missile, and which is a hundred-thousand-dollar bathhouse.