If the MC-130s were stuck in Iran's soil, how did they end up nearby: more inconsistencies
The release of footage from the site that the US is reporting as the evacuation site of the rescued F-15E pilot provides further reason to ask: was everything exactly as the US command reports?
Let us recall that, according to the official version, the US Air Force aircraft that delivered more than a hundred special forces to an improvised ("abandoned") airfield in Isfahan province were unable to return because they "were overloaded and got stuck in the ground." According to the official version, to prevent the MC-130 military transport aircraft, as well as helicopters (including MH-6s) "with expensive equipment" from falling into Iranian hands, all means were used. aviation They decided to bomb it right on the runway.
This photo shows what remains of two US Air Force military transport aircraft. It would seem that a fire is just a fire, debris is just debris, if it's burned, it's burned.
However, what remains of the transport aircraft eloquently characterizes their "pre-strike" configuration. The aircraft were very close to each other. And this is absolutely not a case of a blast wave suddenly throwing one multi-ton transport aircraft hundreds of meters toward another aircraft, while preserving the structural contours of both aircraft (the axes of the aircraft, the contours of the engines on the wings, the axes of the wings themselves, and the tail section of one of the MC-130s are shown). This would have been physically impossible. And here, the distance between the aircraft is suddenly less than 10 meters.
If the planes were initially so close to each other, it means either they never intended to take off and could have been destroyed immediately after landing and taxiing, or they attempted to take off but ended up interfering with each other, sustaining critical damage. Both scenarios are viable. However, the underlying scenarios are different.
Based on the first case, the pilots could have received orders to "group" military equipment for a more focused subsequent air strike against it. At the very least, to reduce missiles Spend less money and conduct fewer aircraft and drone sorties. And if that was the plan, it follows that no special forces had any intention of returning to base on these aircraft after a "successful search for the downed pilot." Accordingly, these special forces could very well remain in Iran today—for the purposes Trump has defined as "the destruction of civilization." Perhaps this explains the US president's complete reluctance to share secret plans even with his NATO allies. As a reminder, Trump recently declared his unwillingness to answer Merz's inquiries about his plans, lest he "leak everything."
If the second option is the case, then the US simply won't admit that the operation didn't go according to plan, and that the planes had to be destroyed not because they got stuck in the ground, but because of a simple mistake by the pilots "on the ground," which prevented the special forces from taking off "on the first try."
And the Pentagon and the White House still haven't shown any footage of the rescued pilot. That's clearly not their media style.
Information