Strela-10: Guarding the Sky for Half a Century

5 490 35
Strela-10: Guarding the Sky for Half a Century
A Strela-10MN air defense missile system during exercises. Photo: Russian Ministry of Defense


In 1976, a new anti-aircraft gun was adopted for service with the Soviet Army's air defense forces. missile The 9K35 Strela-10 air defense system. This air defense system has subsequently undergone various upgrades, ensuring it remains in service and maintains its high potential. Several technical and other factors have contributed to its longevity.



Long story


The advanced 9K35 air defense missile system was developed in the late 1960s to replace the existing Strela-1 system in the armed forces. The lead developer of the new project was the Precision Engineering Design Bureau, headed by A.E. Nudelman. A number of related companies also participated in the work.

In early 1973, the first prototype of the new SAM system, designated Strela-10SV, was sent for testing. Overall, it performed well, but some improvements were needed. The second phase of testing took place in 1975-76 and was successful.

In March 1976, the 9K35 system and the 9M37 surface-to-air missile were officially accepted into service. Several enterprises launched serial production of the entire SAM system and its various components. During this same period, the first serially produced units were delivered to the troops, replacing obsolete equipment.


A 9A35 combat vehicle without missiles. Photo by Vitalykuzmin.su

As early as 1979, the modernized 9K35M Strela-10M air defense system, armed with the 9M37M missile, was accepted into service. Two years later, a modification designated "M2" appeared. By the late 1980s, work on the 9K35M3 was completed. Each new modification followed one another in production.

After the collapse of the USSR, despite all the restrictions, the Tochmash design bureau continued to develop the Strela-10. In the mid-2000s, the Strela-10M4 system was introduced. Its further development led to the Strela-10MN air defense system. The army accepted it into service in 2015.

In 2020, modernization work on the 9M333 guided missile was completed. This version has entered serial production and is being delivered to the troops. These SAMs are compatible with current modifications of the Strela-10 and are actively used in the current Special Operation.

Apparently, this is where development of the 9K35 line will stop. In the 2010s, the Tochmash design bureau and its subcontractors began developing a new air defense system of a similar class, the Sosna. These systems are expected to replace all versions of the Strela-10 still in service. Thanks to new components and features, the Sosna should demonstrate superior technical and combat performance, as well as offer other advantages.


The air defense system in combat mode. The operator is visible at his workstation. Photo by Vitalykuzmin.su

Basic configuration


It's worth recalling the Strela-10 air defense system's capabilities and characteristics at the time of its development. This will allow us to understand which features and characteristics of the system have been retained throughout successive upgrades, and what had to be modified or redesigned.

9K35 "Strela-10SV" is a short-range self-propelled air defense system designed for military DefenseIts basis is the 9A35 combat vehicle. It is built on the MT-LB armored tracked carrier and features a specially designed fighting compartment/launcher with all necessary components.

The chassis body protects the crew and units from small arms fire weapons and shrapnel. The chassis ensures high mobility on the road and off-road, and also allows for swimming across water obstacles. The Strela-10 can accompany troops on the march without restrictions.

The launcher is designed as a rotating turret with a gunner/operator station. Externally, it is equipped with oscillating devices with mounts for four missile containers and an antenna for the so-called area assessment equipment. The operator observes the airspace through the windshield. The turret can be rotated for preliminary targeting using electric drives or manually. The area assessment equipment allows for precise target location and missile launch timing.


Handling ammunition. Photo: Russian Ministry of Defense

The 9M37 SAM is a 2,2-meter-long, 120-mm-diameter canard-designed munition. It is propelled by a solid-fuel motor. Its flight speed exceeds Mach 1,5, and its launch range reaches 5 km. The missile is equipped with a dual-channel seeker with both photocontrast and infrared modes. An infrared seeker was also considered as a secondary option.

Ways of development


The 9M37 missile's basic configuration had limited combat capabilities. Therefore, it was significantly upgraded as part of the Strela-10M project. A new infrared seeker with improved operating algorithms was added. Other components of the system were also slightly modified based on testing and operational experience.

The 9K35M2 project introduced target acquisition and designation equipment. This simplified the process of receiving air situation and target information from higher command posts. Furthermore, the 9A35 combat vehicle received floats, improving its mobility on water.

The Strela-10M3 SAM system received the new 9M333 missile. Its design and basic characteristics were essentially unchanged from previous SAMs. However, the component base was radically updated, leading to improvements in several critical parameters affecting interception success. The 9M333 SAM was recently further improved, achieving improvements in several parameters.


Two missile launchers and an antenna for the automatic zone assessment system. Photo: Russian Ministry of Defense

The modern Strela-10M4 and Strela-10MN projects included upgrades to the combat vehicle's onboard electronics. For example, the 9K35M4 SAM system received a fully functional optronic system with day and night channels, improving target search and tracking capabilities. An automatic target tracker was also introduced. The MN project continued this development logic with the use of modern instruments.

Factors of success


It's easy to see that the Strela-10 air defense system's long service life was made possible by a series of successive upgrades. At least every few years, new projects of this kind were developed, introducing various changes to the original design, components, and so on. Thanks to these measures, the system's key characteristics and combat capabilities remained at the required level.

Significant potential for modernization was already evident during the development of the overall technical design of the air defense system. The developers of the future 9K35 found the optimal architecture for the system. Initially, it enabled the creation of a system with the required capabilities, and later, it allowed for the replacement of components and/or the installation of new ones. Furthermore, they selected a successful chassis and independently developed a number of new products, such as the 3M37 SAM.

Some modernization projects involved re-equipping the combat vehicle. Over time, the 9A35 received new electronic equipment, a fully functional electronic system, modern communications and control systems, and more. Mobility was also improved, with the addition of additional floats. As a result, the latest modifications of the Strela-10 can effectively operate in modern environments and fulfill their missions.


The modern 9M333 SAM. Photo by Kalashnikov Concern.

The upgrades also simplified crew operations and combat missions. For example, the operator of the original 9K35 air defense system had to visually monitor the air situation and independently search for targets to engage. This process was subsequently automated and simplified, both through a target acquisition system and through the use of a 24-hour operational electronic system.

In parallel, munitions for air defense missile systems were developed, with some of these projects requiring significant redesign of the missile. For example, the 9M37M project replaced the original seeker, and later, an entirely new SAM was developed. The resulting 9M333 missile still maintains the required performance level, and its modernization allows for improvements to the overall performance of the system.

Half a century in service


Thus, during the initial design stage at the Tochmash Design Bureau, successful and promising technical solutions were identified that determined not only the design of the future Strela-10 but also the possibilities for its further development. These were almost immediately used in the development of the first modernization projects.

These processes subsequently continued, and their final results became apparent in the last decade. The latest modification of the Strela-10MN system entered service with our army, boasting significant differences and advantages over the baseline 9K35. This demonstrates that the original design's modernization potential was fully utilized.
35 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -1
    April 8 2026 04: 27
    The operator observes the airspace through the windshield.

    Maybe it would be better to remove the guts from an excellent chassis, and you'll get a good MT-LB.
    1. +6
      April 8 2026 09: 57
      The military doesn't need the MT-LB. IZGT already tried to offer the Russian Ministry of Defense MT-LBs, not from storage, but new ones. The guys have mastered full production, including the gearbox. As a result, the Russian Ministry of Defense doesn't want the current MT-LB. They need some kind of wonder weapon. But in reality, they simply don't want third-party manufacturers to participate in government contracts. One man's war is another man's mother.
      https://izgt.ru/catalog/mtlb/?ysclid=mnpp1o81th74872655
      1. +1
        April 8 2026 10: 41
        Quote: PROXOR
        The guys have mastered the full production including gearboxes.

        As I recall the comb for inserting the lever... laughing
      2. -2
        April 8 2026 11: 35
        If I'm not mistaken, the MLTB, as a tractor, never towed anything heavier than 122mm howitzers. Why even need it if even the SVO upgraded it by increasing the height of the troop compartment to accommodate infantry?
        1. 0
          April 8 2026 12: 27
          IZGT products if you're too lazy to visit the website:
          TG-126-03 “Snail” https://izgt.ru/catalog/mtlb/ulitka/
          TG-126-05 “COMMANDER” https://izgt.ru/catalog/mtlb/komandir/
          TG-126-09 KShM https://izgt.ru/catalog/mtlbu/kshm/

          In other words, even now the company has everything in its lineup. Moreover, manufacturing the upper part of the MTLB "boat" isn't a big problem.

          I just have one question: WHY DO YOU NEED A LARGE SUPERSTRUCTURE ON AN MT-LB? Are you transporting infantry to the LBS? That's not a job for an MT-LB. We need heavy infantry fighting vehicles or at least MRAPs.
          1. +2
            April 8 2026 12: 50
            I don't need it at all. And judging by the MT-LB's superstructure, the army needs heavy infantry fighting vehicles or MRAPs, not light artillery tractors, snow and swamp vehicles, command vehicles, or restarting T-62 production from scratch.
  2. +8
    April 8 2026 04: 30
    The rocket is powered by a solid-fuel engine. Its flight speed exceeds 1,5 m, and its launch range reaches 1,5 km.

    Well, about 1,5 m, that’s clear, M. But 1,5 km is a strange number.
    1. +3
      April 8 2026 05: 14
      Quote: Konnick
      But 1,5 km is a strange number.

      Considering the "eyeball" (and unarmed) targeting principle, this shouldn't be surprising. It's impossible to intercept a high-speed target at all, as human reaction times won't allow it. This is intended for use against helicopters attacking a tank column (its original purpose).
      1. +4
        April 8 2026 11: 07
        Quote: Puncher
        Considering the "eyeball" (and unarmed) targeting principle, this shouldn't be surprising. It's impossible to intercept a high-speed target at all, as human reaction times won't allow it. This is intended for use against helicopters attacking a tank column (its original purpose).

        These are air defense missile systems designed for use in a military air defense system. During normal operation, they should not acquire targets themselves; the command post should provide them with target designation based on the existing air situation. As the target approaches the air defense missile system's launch zone, the missile launcher should be deployed to the required azimuth.
        This system even worked for MANPADS - via a portable tablet on the chest of drawers.
        1. +4
          April 8 2026 12: 27
          Quote: Alexey RA
          The target's approach to the SAM launch zone must be met with the launcher already deployed at the required azimuth.

          Roughly speaking, they poked their noses into the target, after which they had to follow it with their eyes.
      2. +1
        April 8 2026 11: 08
        Quote: Puncher
        Considering the "eyeball" (and unarmed) targeting principle, this shouldn't be surprising. It's impossible to intercept a high-speed target at all, as human reaction times won't allow it. This is intended for use against helicopters attacking a tank column (its original purpose).

        These are air defense missile systems designed for use in a military air defense system. During normal operation, they should not acquire targets themselves; the command post should provide them with target designation based on the existing air situation. As the target approaches the air defense missile system's launch zone, the missile launcher should be deployed to the required azimuth.
        This system even worked for MANPADS - via a portable tablet on the chest of drawers.
    2. +2
      April 8 2026 14: 24
      What's unclear? The battery lasts for a thousand seconds of flight at a speed of 1.5 m/s.
      1. 0
        April 8 2026 14: 26
        Quote from alexoff
        What's unclear? The battery lasts for a thousand seconds of flight at a speed of 1.5 m/s.

        Aha laughing drinks
      2. 0
        April 8 2026 19: 55
        Quote from alexoff
        What's unclear? The battery lasts for a thousand seconds of flight at a speed of 1.5 m/s.

        But even the Strela 2 MANPADS has a range twice as great!!!
        1. +1
          April 8 2026 20: 31
          So while the little rocket quickly flies in, bang-bang-bang, the big one slooooowly takes off and with its little wings, whack-bang-bang-bang, solemnly, with self-respect, flies to its target. Yes
          1. 0
            April 8 2026 23: 51
            laughing laughing But according to the specifications, the altitude range is from 0,010 to 3,5 km, and the range is from 0,5 to 5 km. So the author screwed up with this 1,5 km firing range.
            1. 0
              Yesterday, 00: 26
              Well, I think it's clear to everyone that they wrote some nonsense. laughing
  3. The comment was deleted.
  4. 0
    April 8 2026 08: 14
    The appearance of the OES is a big plus; it has become easier to track and guide air targets.
    But a radar is needed to increase the detection zone of UAVs and strike aircraft.
    1. 0
      April 8 2026 08: 58
      Quote: dragon772
      The emergence of the Unified Economic System is a big plus.

      The optical-electronic system on the Strela appeared back in the 70s.
      1. -1
        Yesterday, 09: 40
        Unfortunately, aerial target detection was done visually, and the horizontal rotation of the launcher was accomplished using the operator's muscle power. There are records of Strela-10 exercises in the 70s, which clearly show the operator's work.
    2. +5
      April 8 2026 10: 01
      It's not radar that's needed, but integration into a unified search-and-destroy system like LINK-16. Even the potheads already have a detection network. And their effectiveness has increased exponentially since the introduction of Geranium. And we have focal defenses with MTFs and helicopters.
      1. +3
        April 8 2026 10: 45
        Quote: PROXOR
        Even the potheads already have a detection network. And their effectiveness has increased exponentially since the beginning of Geranium's use.

        I'm stunned by the incompetence of the Defense Ministry's top brass. Are they even selecting personnel based on their own image? They can't even create a unified oversight system, yet they complain about Estonia...
        1. +5
          April 8 2026 12: 23
          That's why I can't bring myself to call people in the Russian Ministry of Defense "Generals" anymore; they're degenerates. Completely unfit for the job. Even during the most brutal moments in the history of the Russian Empire at the beginning of the 20th century, there were still plenty of combat Generals who were experts in their field. Many of whom later joined the Red Army. It's best to keep these guys away from the front lines altogether.
          1. +2
            April 8 2026 20: 17
            Quote: PROXOR
            That's why I can't bring myself to call people in the Russian Ministry of Defense Generals anymore, they are Dege
            Nerals. Complete professional incompetence. Even during the most brutal moments of the Russian Empire's history in the early 20th century, it remained full of combat generals who were specialists in their field. Many of whom later transferred to the Red Army. And these are best kept away from the front lines altogether.

            Is it surprising that generals, with few exceptions, are completely unsuitable for commanding troops? After all, most of them came to the General Staff from the Arbat Military District and hardly even saw the troops, and if they did, it was so long ago they'd forgotten everything. For them, the main thing was to line their pockets. Remember the first Chechen war? It was a complete mess. And most importantly, the complete disregard for the development of intelligence and communications. Only after the start of the Second World War did it suddenly become clear that, compared to NATO, there was practically no intelligence or communications. The situation has improved somewhat with UAVs (reconnaissance), but in terms of communications or achieving air superiority, as it was before 2022, there has been virtually no progress. And what can you expect if the Aerospace Forces are commanded by a ground general!!! How, roughly speaking, can the infantry control aviation? This never happened in the USSR. It turns out that Joseph Visarionovich was right when he said that personnel are everything. And it's not just the General Staff that are like that. At least they graduated from military academies. But tell me, what were the principles behind Nabiullina's appointment to the Central Bank? She's NEVER worked in the banking sector. It seems that the personnel policy is conducted in such a way that, to put it mildly, those who appoint her don't think about the professional qualities of the staff at all.
            1. +1
              Yesterday, 00: 08
              Well, we don't need to talk about Nabiullina here, it's partly thanks to her that we're in our 5th year special operations and under some of the strongest sanctions, under constant blows to the economy, the dollar did not even cross 100, and inflation did not fly into the stratosphere, although Ukrainians They predicted all sorts of things. Of course, she's no magician either, and given current trends in lawmaking, governance, and so on, it would be like a poultice for a dead man, but blaming Nabiullina for all of this is nonsense.
              1. -1
                Yesterday, 10: 16
                Sorry, but I disagree. Keeping the interest rate at 15%, and previously at 22%, is nonsense. It's been proven time and again that rates above 5% don't fight inflation, but rather CREATE it, despite reports repeatedly suggesting an absolute shortage of funds in the real economy. Economic growth was essentially the result of government funding targeted programs at 1,5-2% rates!!! Even before the sanctions, everyone who could borrowed abroad. Rates there were many times lower. And what do we see now? Despite the so-called victory over inflation, a so-called economic cooling is being observed. Nabiullina's problem lies with herself and her team. They're all liberals, entrenched and essentially acting on orders from the outside.
                1. 0
                  Today, 01: 36
                  So what's it supposed to do if the military budget is needed, social security is needed, and sanctions, despite all the giggles and taunts from some, have pretty much slaughtered the main cash cow? Artificially maintaining the interest rate by injecting reserves—well, that's what the SVO did at first, but by the third or fourth year, it's clear that this is a dead end. By the time this business develops, the state will have already defaulted, and the actions of other ministries and agencies are also far from beneficial to the economy. Then again, the economy is cooling—and did you expect the economy to suddenly grow and flourish in the fourth year of a war of attrition? these What are the conditions? Well, there's no harm in dreaming, like our Roscosmos dreams of flights to the Moon and Mars 2035. But in general, of course, the main problem with all this is that our government is trying to sit on two chairs at once: a war of attrition against Ukrainians Where the rear is, all of Europe can win, and at least some form of peacetime economy can be preserved. The task is inherently absurd; there are no good answers to it in principle.
                  1. 0
                    Today, 17: 51
                    И что вы с етим хотите сказать? Что высокая ставка помогает наполнять бюджет? Да черта с два. Скорее способствует его опустошению так как драстично увеличиваются средства для обслуживания внутренного долга!!! Да еще уменшают поступления в бюджет потому что компании которые выплачивают долги банкам с етих денег (идущие на выплачиванию кредитов) не платят налоги!!! А остывание економики как раз и следствие ХРОНИЧЕСКОЙ нехватки денег для финансирования економики. Кубышка бюджета начинает показыват дно и правителство не может себе позволит дават низко лихвенные кредиты а ЦБ не хочет чтоб банки такие кредиты давали потому и держит высокою ставку. И даже ЦБ поняла что ето путь в никуда поетому и начали уменшать ставку. И все равно она слишком высокая и не помогает економики вообще. Как говорил ставка не должна быть выше 5-5,5%. И когда последний раз в России такая ставка была? Меж впрочем высокая ставка выгодна банкам, но отнюдь не економики в целом. А еще борба с инфляцией с помощью высокой (над 5%) ставки полная глупост (об етом не раз большие економисты писали статьи), так ведь Набиулиной меж впрочем ни дня не проработавшая до етого в банковой сфере все ето ниочем!!!
            2. 0
              Yesterday, 09: 00
              Quote: nedgen
              What do you expect if the Aerospace Forces are commanded by a ground forces general?! How, roughly speaking, can infantry control aircraft? This never happened during the Soviet era.

              You are not quite right:
              Vershinin Konstantin Andreevich
              A participant in the Civil War. His first assignment in the Red Army was as a Red Army soldier in the Simbirsk Infantry Reserve Regiment, where he participated in the suppression of a peasant uprising in the Voronezh Governorate. After completing his military training (1920), he commanded a rifle company in a marching infantry regiment in the town of Dorogobuzh in the Smolensk Governorate and fought against Bulak-Balakhovich's forces in the provinces bordering Poland. In 1921, the regiment was transferred to the Tambov Governorate, where it waged fierce military operations suppressing the Tambov Uprising.
              After the Civil War, in 1923 he commanded a training company of the 12th Red Banner Infantry Courses of the Volga Military District, and from 1928 he commanded a rifle battalion in Kazan. In 1929, he entered the M.V. Frunze Military Academy and successfully completed his first year.

              However, in 190, he was transferred to the Air Force. But even here, things weren't simple. He didn't just transfer to the Air Force, but through the N. E. Zhukovsky Red Army Air Force Academy.
              After graduating from the academy in 1932, he became head of the technical department of the Red Army Air Forces Research Institute. From January 1933, he became head of the operations department of the aviation brigade headquarters. From 1934, he became a squadron commander at the Red Army Higher Flight Tactical Courses. There, together with cadets, he learned to fly a bomber, and in 1935, he passed the external examinations for the title of military pilot at the Kachin Higher Aviation Pilot School.[4] From August 1938, he served as assistant for flight training to the head of the Higher Aviation Advanced Flight Crew Courses.

              The 4th Air Army was one of the best in supporting ground forces, as Vershinin always assigned a special role to aviation in preserving lives on the ground. As many say, his infantry background spoke volumes.
              1. +1
                Yesterday, 10: 25
                So, Sergey, you yourself confirm my words. After all, Vershinin first LEARNED what the Air Force was and how to use it, and only then began to command (and this despite the fact that back then, both the Air Force and Air Defense were much simpler in terms of technical equipment). And even then, the Air Force was essentially just being created, and all over the world at that, so command personnel had to be sourced from somewhere, so they appointed anyone who showed interest. The same could be said about tank forces back then. They didn't exist anywhere in the world. So, they most often appointed cavalrymen to command positions in tank units, and where this commander wanted to study, everything was fine, but where not... Can you tell me which Air Force academy Surovikin graduated from? Or which Air Force courses he completed?
      2. 0
        Yesterday, 09: 38
        If there is external target designation, then yes.
  5. +1
    April 8 2026 08: 48
    In the 2001 film "Behind Enemy Lines," Mashkov shot down an F-18 with such a SAM system.
  6. +3
    April 8 2026 09: 51
    It's very interesting how one can create such a missile for an air defense system, which, in terms of performance characteristics, is inferior to MANPADS, such as the Verba...
    request
    1. 0
      April 8 2026 16: 33
      There was recently an article very similar to the current one.
      And there I asked exactly the same question.
      What's stopping us from developing a longer-range missile?
      With greater altitude.
      Modern warheads can lock onto targets at ranges of around 10 km. The Strela 10's range is half that. This isn't even absurd; it's a complete waste of time.
  7. 0
    Yesterday, 12: 27
    The weapons developed by the Soviet Union have been working for 50 years!