How and on what planes US special forces escaped from Iran: inconsistencies in the official version

46 353 61
How and on what planes US special forces escaped from Iran: inconsistencies in the official version

The more official details emerge from the US command regarding the rescue of the downed American pilot, the more questions arise about it. As Military Review previously reported, the rescue operation for the F-15E pilot deep in Iran could well have been a cover story. In this regard, a theory has been put forward online that special forces landed in Iran to locate and remove enriched uranium. As a reminder, according to the IAEA, Iran has approximately 400 kg of this material.

The official account of the "downed pilot evacuation" operation reads as follows: over a hundred special forces soldiers were airlifted to a makeshift airfield near the Zagros Mountains by MC-130 military transport aircraft. When the pilot was discovered hiding behind a rock, he was loaded aboard an MH-6 helicopter and evacuated. The operation was covered from the air by A-10 Thunderbolt attack aircraft, attack helicopters, drones and F-35 stealth aircraft.



What's particularly interesting is that two MC-130 transport planes failed to take off from that very same improvised runway at the foot of the mountains. The Pentagon says they got stuck in either sand or mud because they were "too heavy for that kind of terrain." And since the US Air Force command "couldn't allow the planes with important equipment on board to fall into Iranian hands," the decision was made to destroy the planes with air strikes.

So far everything is relatively logical. But the logic still begins to fail.

It turns out that the American aviation She also destroyed four of her own helicopters (including an MH-6, similar to the one used to evacuate the Air Force officer found “behind the rock”).

But if the destruction of the MC-130 military transport planes can be explained by the fact that they are heavy and “that’s why they didn’t take off,” then what prevented the light MH-6s from taking off?

Moreover, the question arises: if the Pentagon is talking about over a hundred American special forces who participated in the operation to rescue the downed pilot for two days, then how did they fly back, if their own forces "minus" practically everything they flew to Iran on?

American media outlets claim the explanation is quite simple: it turns out Central Command simply dispatched—pay attention—three more MC-130J Commando II transports to the same makeshift airfield somewhere near Isfahan. And these planes actually took off without getting stuck in the sand or mud... But why did the first ones get stuck, while these others took off safely?

You see, say American military experts, "the whole point is that the pilots of the other planes already knew the runway's features, and therefore took into account all the nuances of its length and the soil characteristics." This is what allowed everyone to safely depart.

The picture emerges as follows: first, one or two companies of special forces, who had found and evacuated the F-15E pilot, abandoned the transports along with the pilots of the stranded transports. They then watched as their own aircraft pounded the "airfield," along with the planes and helicopters, to prevent them from falling into Iranian hands. Then, the same special forces waited for three other military transport aircraft, which not only landed successfully in the same spot where the remains of the previous MC-130s were still burning and where charred craters were "smoking," but also took off safely, "simply having more optimally distributed the load."

So what about the helicopters? Why did the Americans decide to bomb them too? Are they stuck?

American press version:

Loading them back onto transport planes or waiting for them to depart on their own was too risky and time-consuming. Iranian forces were already approaching. Therefore, the decision was made to destroy them along with the transport planes.

There's an admission that "Iranian forces were approaching." But apparently they were approaching so slowly that during that time, the Americans had time to bomb everything, decide on additional aircraft, and, in fact, wait for those aircraft to arrive, then load up and depart—and without a final MANPADS shot in the tail, no less...

Conclusion: this all sounds like a load of crap from the American military and the American media. Accordingly, either dozens of other American soldiers were killed by Iranian strikes during the evacuation of one—not all of them flew back. Or no one was planning to fly back that day or two of the operation—they dispersed throughout Iran, in order to, indeed, conduct another operation later. In the latter case, the rescue of the pilot could very well have been just a cover—to conceal the possibility of a ground invasion from their own electorate, claiming that all this was necessary to save Private Ryan downed pilot.
61 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    April 6 2026 21: 44
    Tu returned from a meeting with his fellow soldiers, but when everyone read this, they realized enough was enough. The mind doesn't understand.
  2. +4
    April 6 2026 21: 45
    "Fog of war" = military lies )))))) If we accept the second option as reality, then we will soon find out about it... But the Iranians are great!!! Keep it up!
    1. +5
      April 6 2026 22: 12
      In fact, the Persians posted a photo of a charred skull in the wreckage of a burned-out "Hercules," but alas, confirming the authenticity of this photo is a big question.
    2. + 16
      April 7 2026 04: 10
      Quote: drags33
      "Fog of war" = military lies )))))) If we accept the second option as reality, then we will soon find out about it... But the Iranians are great!!! Keep it up!

      It's clear to me that all this bullshit from the Trump administration about "evacuating a downed pilot" is complete nonsense!
      If this had actually happened, footage of this pilot would have been broadcast 24 hours a day on TV and online. There would have been interviews with him. Trump would have been shaking his hand. They would have held Protestant ceremonies and prayers with howling, just like Trump loves, with the laying on of hands and prayer breakfasts...
      All this does not exist.
      Even AI generated...
      It turns out that Trump doesn't have any "shot down pilot"!
      1. 0
        April 7 2026 04: 51
        It turns out that Trump doesn't have any "shot down pilot"!
        You're wrong. It does exist. Trump himself is already that same "downed pilot," even though he tries not to show it. The war he unleashed is forcing his own allies to slowly distance themselves from him.
      2. +8
        April 7 2026 07: 19
        It turns out that Trump has no "downed pilot"

        On the other hand, where are the photos of the captured or dead pilot, the killed special forces soldiers, and so on? There must be plenty of them. So the question is: what was the final result?
        1. +2
          April 7 2026 17: 33
          On the other hand, where's the conference with the rescued pilot? If they planted a dummy, well, it'd be easy to fool us, but Trump wouldn't care about his own meticulous journalists. And I agree with you on this. So the question is: what happened in the end?
  3. +2
    April 6 2026 21: 47
    "Fog of war." But anyway, the bones should have been charred, the teeth... The Yankees didn't gather their remains from the burning rubble. It's up to Iran to determine whether there were any casualties.
    1. +2
      April 6 2026 22: 09
      Iran has already released a photo of a badly burned corpse.
    2. 0
      April 7 2026 08: 57
      Well, what can I say? Maybe in a movie you can wander through mountainous terrain behind enemy lines for 13 days and nights. But in real life? The first guy who twists or breaks his leg goes from being a super-specialist to being like, "Oh, my God, so what now?" It's just a leg, a sprain, a problem, without any bloodshed or gunfire.
  4. +3
    April 6 2026 21: 48
    Yeah, right... A blockbuster. Screenwriters are racing to write. Hollywood is gearing up to make a blockbuster film "based on a true story."
    1. +2
      April 6 2026 22: 14
      "The Crash of the Burnt Pilot" and two hours of action ))
  5. + 14
    April 6 2026 21: 50
    Wow, the Americans were caught lying! Who would have thought? Such advanced technology: they're flying to the moon again – and suddenly they're lying!
    1. +4
      April 6 2026 23: 52
      This has never happened before, and here again!
    2. 0
      April 8 2026 19: 02
      There are questions about this supposed lunar mission, and the supposed rescue of the pilot is a complete lie. It was most likely a landing operation, and apparently there were about 300 dead people there. That's why the mattresses are writhing like lice on a comb.
  6. + 10
    April 6 2026 21: 51
    Well, actually, the Americans are real storytellers )))) This particular situation for some reason reminded me of the fantasy about their "flight to the Moon"... There, too, there are fairy tales in the fog... So the Americans are no strangers to lying, and lying BRAZELESSLY and to the whole world!
  7. + 16
    April 6 2026 21: 54
    It's not a bad airfield, five transport planes landed, two of which blocked the runway.
    1. +2
      April 6 2026 22: 53
      This isn't an airfield, but an abandoned runway. We can only guess how many landed and how many took off.
      1. +3
        April 7 2026 00: 03
        Quote: TermNachTER
        abandoned GDP

        FIVE cars landed on it, two of which stalled, and all this on one runway
        1. +1
          April 7 2026 09: 34
          We know how many cars there were from the stories of the mattress makers and what's left burnt. In reality, only the mattress makers know how many.
      2. -1
        April 7 2026 08: 39
        abandoned GDP
        For such mistakes, the FSB might take note!
        1. 0
          April 7 2026 09: 35
          Maybe and maybe, but I don’t live in Russia.
  8. +7
    April 6 2026 21: 59
    to hide the option of a ground invasion from their own electorate, claiming that all this was necessary to save Private Ryan, the downed pilot.

    It's more like "blaming" accumulated losses on "Private Ryan"—like, it's worth it for him. Trump has plenty.
  9. +4
    April 6 2026 22: 00
    Why are you so hung up on mattresses? For their people, with their education, it's enough. In Brussels, local MPs couldn't find Iran on a map, and you want some insight into the topic. laughing
  10. -1
    April 6 2026 22: 02
    Couldn't they have pushed it out? 200-300 legs certainly could have done it 🤣
  11. -13
    April 6 2026 22: 21
    Conclusion: all this looks like a load of nonsense from the American military department and the American media.
    Or maybe someone forgot to put on a tinfoil hat) After all, they could have not wasted so much equipment for the life of one pilot and let him go to waste, really "stupid"
    So what about helicopters?
    Maybe they ran out of fuel? Apparently, such thoughts never occurred to the author?
    and without a final shot from a MANPADS in the tail

    Apparently, the author didn't see a video of a transport plane flying smoothly while refueling two helicopters. Why weren't they firing MANPADS? They probably just weren't there. Or maybe it's all a neural network, or Kubrick filmed it on a soundstage. He needs to wear his hat tighter. hi
    1. +1
      April 7 2026 11: 00
      Quote: spirit
      Apparently the author didn't see a video of a transport plane calmly flying while refueling two helicopters. Why didn't they fire MANPADS?

      Are you sure the filming location is in Iran?
      It could even be the USA - there are deserts and mountains there too.

      Quote: spirit
      Maybe they ran out of fuel? Apparently, such thoughts never occurred to the author?
      Are the pilots so stupid that they refueled one way?
    2. 0
      April 8 2026 02: 45
      Well, well, well... They took helicopters with them in their luggage to fly away on them and didn't even refuel them. Logic! Didn't such reasoning ever occur to you?
  12. +4
    April 6 2026 22: 21
    They always lie when fishing, hunting, and at war! And the way Americans lie... laughing
  13. -11
    April 6 2026 22: 21
    The author needs to wear his tinfoil hat tighter. hi
  14. +1
    April 6 2026 22: 29
    I wonder where are the pilots of the transport planes and helicopters that the Americans destroyed so that they wouldn't fall into enemy hands?
  15. -7
    April 6 2026 22: 35
    Another anti-crisis article negative
  16. BMS
    -2
    April 6 2026 22: 41
    A detective story in the best Hollywood traditions.
  17. +5
    April 6 2026 22: 44
    Moreover, the question arises: if the Pentagon is talking about over a hundred American special forces who participated in the operation to rescue the downed pilot for two days, then how did they fly back, if their own forces "minus" practically everything they flew to Iran on?
    In this regard, I recalled the episode during the evacuation of Americans and their allies from Afghanistan. Back then, fearless British special forces disguised themselves as women and spent almost two days making their way to the evacuation point in Kabul. Perhaps this time, too, the American special forces didn't fly anywhere, but courageously disguised themselves as women and remained in Iran? Alternatively, the American special forces were actually transgender, and disguising themselves as women wasn't difficult for transgender special forces.
  18. +1
    April 6 2026 22: 49
    Personal opinion...
    The main news about the best in our country.
    On the second page are problems in countries that are potential adversaries.
    On the third page is the struggle of independent states against imperialists throughout the world.

    And in this news, nothing is written about the capture of Kyiv, nothing about frosts in the fields of Europe, nothing about the thugs roaming around the capitals of the EU.
  19. +7
    April 6 2026 23: 01
    Yes... Americans are storytellers.
    Pilots can't "take into account the ground conditions" so that an aircraft won't get stuck where another, similarly equipped, just got stuck. The ground either holds, or it doesn't. If the first MC-130s didn't take off because they were "too heavy for the ground," then the second MC-130s are the same in terms of wheelbase and ground pressure. Their mass couldn't have been significantly lighter if they'd brought the same special forces back. "By optimally distributing the load" is especially touching because it's technically impossible: distributing the load across the fuselage won't affect the increase or decrease of the tire contact patch—only skids would help. And knowing the runway length won't change the friction coefficient or rolling resistance on sand or mud—that's physics, not skill. The situation with helicopters in general is hard to understand. Unless they had enough fuel to reach the required point - then yes, there is no point in such a "flight".
    1. -1
      April 6 2026 23: 48
      Maybe they climbed beyond the runway and then looked on the ground to see where the surface was better.
  20. +2
    April 6 2026 23: 45
    Something really strange happened there. Even if they were dispersed, why burn the helicopters? They should have flown away empty, as if everyone had left. I understand they're rich and have lots of planes and helicopters, but it's strange.
    1. +5
      April 6 2026 23: 59
      Quote: griboedov09
      Why burn helicopters?

      I read that the MH-6's stated range is 430 km. They could have reached Kuwait.
  21. 0
    April 6 2026 23: 56
    In reality, things were quite different. A super-duper US special forces unit, along with Navy SEALs, Rangers, and the Drug Enforcement Agency, swam across the Suez Canal (with flippers) and reached Private Ryan through secret routes. Then a clever diversion was employed. It's an old American tactic: burn everything around, but save the private. Some flying metal objects were caught in the fire. The rescued man's stunt double must be shown on TV with his burnt face painted on. If Hollywood makes a movie based on my ideas and doesn't give me money for such a script, I'll sue them all.
  22. 0
    April 7 2026 00: 03
    A version has been put forward that special forces landed in Iran with the aim of finding and removing enriched uranium.

    Nonsense...then they went and ironed out the place where the uranium was found with missiles... belay
    What don't they write in the village?
  23. +2
    April 7 2026 00: 21
    Quote: rytik32
    I read that the MH-6's stated range is 430 km. They could have reached Kuwait.

    At full load???
    1. +2
      April 7 2026 00: 46
      In general, you also need to keep an eye on the weather. It can inflate so much that the manufacturer's stated performance characteristics differ slightly from reality.
  24. 0
    April 7 2026 00: 32
    Quote: griboedov09
    Something very strange happened there.

    There's even a lot that's strange. You can blame it all on the Pentagon's incompetence (which is true), Trump's epic stupidity (also true), or maybe just the division of markets.
  25. -1
    April 7 2026 01: 02
    Until the mattress makers show the rescued pilot, all this is empty talk, and they can show anyone and say that it was he/she who was saved
    In short, they lie like pigs all the time, including Trump.
  26. 0
    April 7 2026 01: 43
    The fact that all the devices were grouped together confirms that they destroyed them themselves. Also, the fact that the Iranians don't know what happened. And then there's the fact that the Americans were able to send planes to bring everyone back. It's absurd to try to storm an underground base with four light helicopters, each carrying a maximum of six people, to find 400 kg of uranium and bring it back in backpacks.
  27. 0
    April 7 2026 02: 09
    More likely they're armed with laser targeting equipment to paint targets for B2 MOABS
  28. 0
    April 7 2026 03: 26
    All this looks like a bunch of nonsense from the American military department.

    Yes, they are all lying there in a pile of corpses, it’s just that the Iranians’ phones’ batteries died...
    1. 0
      April 7 2026 11: 13
      Quote: Puncher
      All this looks like a bunch of nonsense from the American military department.

      Yes, they are all lying there in a pile of corpses, it’s just that the Iranians’ phones’ batteries died...

      Aren't you bothered by the crowd at the site—which Iran knows quite well? They're fast pilots, but he couldn't have fled more than 100 kilometers from the downing site in a day or two.
      And it flies to this place CROWD US aircraft.,.
      1. +1
        April 7 2026 12: 06
        Quote: your1970
        Aren't you bothered by the crowd at a place that is fairly well known to Iran?

        It doesn't bother me. Because the Iranian Armed Forces/IRGC haven't distinguished themselves in any way. Even in Syria, in the war against the slipper wearers. Without our artillery and air force, all they could do was run from the drones, their heels flashing.
  29. 0
    April 7 2026 04: 19
    A parallel emerges with Operation Eagle Claw, conducted on April 24, 1980, by US forces in Iran to rescue 53 hostages from the US embassy in Tehran. The operation ended in complete failure.
    1 EC-130E and 2 RH-53D destroyed
    5 RH-53D helicopters abandoned.
    Casualties: USA - 9 people. Iran - 7 people. The bodies of the American soldiers were abandoned and later released through the Red Cross.
    1. 0
      April 7 2026 12: 48
      So, they were still in the desert and attacked a civilian bus that was "driving by." I don't remember the result, but it's possible there were seven Iranians there.
  30. +1
    April 7 2026 04: 25
    It will soon turn out that about 70 American special forces ate too much expired pizza in Bahrain and passed out in feces.
  31. 0
    April 7 2026 09: 51
    Apparently the author didn't see a video of a transport plane calmly flying while refueling two helicopters. Why didn't they fire MANPADS?

    Where and when was this video taken? Refueling is usually done outside Iranian airspace, but this operation took place very close to the Iranian border. So why refuel over Iran? Besides, Iran has a territory of 1,6 million square kilometers, and placing MANPADS every kilometer is a very interesting idea.
  32. 0
    April 7 2026 11: 47
    There are nothing but inconsistencies here! Special forces landed in Iran with the goal of finding and removing enriched uranium. So what's the main goal? So what?
  33. +1
    April 7 2026 12: 45
    There was information that all the aircraft had some kind of damage from small arms and mortar fire. I don't remember the source, but it was definitely a translation. It all seems logical—the damaged aircraft were burned. The question is, why did they need two trainloads of specialists?! Evacuation teams could have picked up one pilot.
  34. kig
    -1
    April 8 2026 02: 35
    the more questions arise about this operation

    I still don't understand what the author's claims are.

    Trump and Hegseth's version: two HC-130s arrive, land on some agricultural runway, unload the special forces and disassembled MH-6 helicopters, reassemble them, and fly the helicopters into the mountains to retrieve the second pilot. It's entirely possible that the helicopters weren't intended to be loaded back onto the planes at all, but to send them home under their own power over enemy territory... I don't know their flight range or the coordinates of the runway, but the distance from the crash site to Kuwait City is just over 500 km. It turns out that the planes got stuck in the sand upon landing, and whatever else was there was there. This is entirely possible, because no one had been there before, and they don't know what kind of soil it is. They call for backup. Another pair of Hercules helicopters arrive, and, following a tip from those present, they land in a more suitable location. The stuck planes are abandoned, especially the helicopters; they're no longer in the picture.

    It is clear that the author does not believe the official version, but his arguments also look weak.
    1. +1
      April 8 2026 02: 51
      Seriously? Two heavy-lift transport planes are stuck on an abandoned runway. And then, on that very same runway, the same planes arrive! Well, this time we'll definitely take off! Yeah? Your ideas seem a bit weak to me!
      1. kig
        +1
        April 8 2026 10: 41
        Quote: K9_SWAT
        And then, on this very same runway, the same planes arrive!
        Actually, where I read about this epic incident, the type of planes that arrived to retrieve the stranded group isn't mentioned. This probably means they were the same type. And if they were able to land and take off, that could mean several things:
        - they were the same, but empty and therefore lighter (the first two, as the reports say, were "heavily loaded"
        - they were the same, but they were able to show them a more reliable place to land
        - they were of a different type
        - there was something completely different that we don't know about, and no one will tell us
        - there was nothing at all, and it was all nonsense on vegetable oil.
        Choose any one, or come up with your own, I don’t care what you choose.
  35. 0
    April 8 2026 14: 46
    We managed to bomb everything, and make a decision about the arrival of additional aircraft, and, in fact, wait for these aircraft, after which we would load onto them and fly away

    The Iranians were just extras, watching five transport planes fly across their skies. Three here and three there. Such American nonsense... IMHO.
    The fact that the first planes were stopped because they were loaded, while the others were not, is also so-so...
    The last ones had to take off on the same ground, loaded...
  36. 0
    April 8 2026 19: 09
    Here a question arose in me: has the word “ы” already become a swear word?