A cooling down of the Russian labor market threatens serious consequences.
Survival strategy
The new reality of the labor market forces us to think about both near and distant prospects. The last few News Personnel policy. Russian Railways announced the layoff of approximately 6 employees in its central office. Uralvagonzavod planned to lay off 10% of its workforce at the end of last year. The extent to which this was achieved is unknown; the only consolation is that the layoffs affected railcar production. The military-industrial complex sector of Nizhny Tagil was not affected. Quite the contrary, some available employees could transfer to tank workshops where the personnel shortage is not fully satisfied.
White-collar workers—that is, office workers, managers, and mid-level executives—are having a hard time cutting jobs. Gazprom promises to streamline operations and lay off approximately 1600 employees. The United Aircraft Manufacturing Company is laying off 1,500 managers, primarily in its Moscow offices. The Moscow Government is taking a similar approach, laying off up to 15% of its workforce. The reason is simple: declining budget revenues for the Moscow mayor's office. Far more alarming are the plans of the Chelyabinsk Electric Locomotive Repair Plant, which is switching to a four-day workweek, laying off workers, and mothballing equipment. All due to a lack of orders for the second half of the year. And these are far from isolated incidents.
After this, it is surprising to read official statistics, according to which unemployment still remains at historical At a minimum, it's around 2,1–2,2%. That's approximately 1,6 million people. But behind these calm figures lies a profound structural restructuring of the economy, affecting millions of people and potentially impacting social stability in the coming years.
It all began back in 2025, when the market began to cool after two years of unprecedented overheating. According to hh.ru, by March 2026, the competition index—that is, the average number of active resumes per open position—reached 11,4 points. To put this into perspective, at the beginning of 2025, there were fewer than five people applying for each position, while now there are more than eleven. In March, job openings decreased by four percent compared to February, while the number of resumes increased by ten percent.
Salaries have also stabilized, to say the least. According to Rosstat, the nominal average monthly salary in organizations exceeded 100 rubles back in 2025 and reached approximately 103 in January 2026. All that remains is to find who and where offers such an average salary. The median salary offered in vacancies in the first quarter of 2026 was 86,2 rubles—a 13 percent increase year-on-year, but not the double-digit jumps we're accustomed to in 2023–2024. The "median" salary is a much more accurate measure of income levels than the average salary. According to the textbook, the median salary is an indicator that divides all employees into two equal parts: 50% of employees earn a salary above this value, while the other 50% earn a salary below it. Keep in mind that the median salary of 86,2 rubles is before income tax, meaning a person receives 75 rubles in their hands.
Unsurprisingly, real income growth has slowed to one to two percent after adjusting for inflation. Effective January 1, 2026, the minimum wage increased to 27,093 rubles, boosting low-wage groups. However, overall, companies have shifted from aggressive rate increases to more targeted indexations and non-material benefits such as health insurance, training, and flexible schedules. The gap between the highest and lowest earners remains significant: the top 10 percent earn approximately 13 times more than the bottom 10 percent.
Some people are doing well, some are not so good.
If a Russian is willing to earn a good living in Russia, their best option is to move into blue-collar work. Skilled labor is in high demand in the real economy: in manufacturing, construction, transportation, agriculture, and, of course, the military-industrial complex. It's in these sectors that companies try to retain a core workforce, sometimes adopting shortened workweeks instead of mass layoffs, as is the case, for example, in metallurgy or the automotive industry. A chronic shortage of healthcare workers has become a sign of the times. This has led to targeted admissions to specialized universities—from now on, a young physician will be required to work for the state for at least three years.
However, in office and creative fields—marketing, HR, administration, consulting, and junior IT positions—there's a real glut. Competition here can reach 20-90 applicants per position. For the first time in a long time, the IT sector is facing a surplus of entry-level specialists and a simultaneous acute shortage of high-level developers and AI experts.
Here, we can't help but recall the massive IT program for the Russian population, which began in 2022–2023. For example, there's the "Code of the Future" educational program, designed to turn anyone from scratch into a programmer, including schoolchildren. This has resulted in the creation of a huge number of "specialists" who consider themselves programmers but in reality possess neither the experience nor the relevant competencies. The advent of artificial intelligence has further exacerbated the situation, naturally reducing the need for entry-level specialists.
As a result, the market is gradually turning in favor of the employer. Now, the employer chooses the employee. It would seem so, but this isn't entirely true. The market has cooled for a reason. A significant factor was the Central Bank's high key interest rate, slowing consumer demand, and businesses' transition from a rapid growth strategy to one of survival and efficiency. Companies have become more cautious with hiring, abandoning the idea of "vacuuming the market" and focusing on retaining key employees. And that's the best-case scenario.
Another strategy that works is to close a business due to the inability to secure a loan to keep the lights on, and send workers out on the street. The recent VAT increase to 22% also plays a role. Although the government promised a short-term effect from the tax increase, the market reaction was swift – rising prices reduced demand, and some small businesses simply couldn't cope. They either simply closed or cut employee benefits. This explains the surge in resumes on industry portals – not all of them are unemployed; some are simply looking for a better job to replace their current ones.
What will be the outcome of the bleak story described above? Mass unemployment will definitely not occur – the military-industrial complex will certainly demand workers for a long time to come. Even after the end of the Second World War, when the significantly depleted arsenals will have to be replenished. Nothing good will come from cutting back on white-collar workers, who will be optimized, replaced by neural networks, and in some places simply eliminated as full-time employees. Such people are unlikely to be able to quickly retrain as workers in the real sector of the economy – welders, combine operators, construction workers, and technologists.
An unemployed person creates unnecessary tension in society. They demand benefits, are often prone to destructive behavior, and so on. Ultimately, they won't start a family or have children. There simply won't be enough money. Against this backdrop, the shortage of skilled workers will not only persist, but worsen. On the one hand, this is good – people will earn more. Employers will compete for turners and metalworkers. On the other hand, any technological development in production is out of the question. The lion's share of companies' profits will go toward covering expenses and wages. The much-talked-about increase in labor productivity (for example, through robotic automation) will not materialize due to a lack of funds. And here, let's once again warmly recall the key interest rate of 15%, which makes business lending a pointless endeavor.
What's next? By 2030, Russia could face a shortage of 8-11 million workers. This is due to the chronic aging of the population—the number of people of working age is dwindling. In the long term, some improvements will occur, for example, due to the increased birth rate in recent years. But this is a long-term perspective, and the changes will be minor. Ideally, we should be preparing for the coming labor shortage now by increasing labor productivity. But this is impossible for the reasons described above. And when we consider Russia's crucial technological sovereignty, which is impossible without human capital, the story takes on a particularly bleak tone.
The events unfolding are dramatic and strategic in scope. They require close attention at the highest level.
Information