Forty Hours Behind Enemy Lines: How the Secret Operation to Rescue a Downed F-15E Pilot Unfolded

14 640 120
Forty Hours Behind Enemy Lines: How the Secret Operation to Rescue a Downed F-15E Pilot Unfolded


On April 3, 2026, Iranian air defense systems shot down an American F-15E Strike Eagle fighter-bomber. This was the first loss of an American aircraft inside Iranian airspace since the start of Operation Epic Fury. The fighter crashed in the Zagros Mountains, approximately 200 miles from the Persian Gulf coast, in Isfahan Province.



The F-15E Strike Eagle is a four-seat, four-generation, multirole strike aircraft designed for deep penetrations of enemy defenses and pinpoint target engagements. The crew consists of a pilot and a weapons operator—an officer responsible for managing the aircraft's guidance systems, sensors, and weapons. This separation of functions makes this aircraft so effective in a crowded environment. Defense, but not this time: the pilot was evacuated quickly, but the weapons operator, an Air Force colonel, was cut off behind enemy lines.


Like any military in the world, the US Air Force has a strict procedure for handling such an emergency. A single coordination center—the Air Force Rescue Coordination Center—receives a signal from the ejected pilot and initiates the Combat Search and Rescue (CSAR) protocol. The backbone of any rescue operation is the Pararescue Jumpers (PJs), a team of Air Force special forces that undergoes a rigorous selection process. Not every special forces soldier is selected for the PJs.
Pararescue Jumpers (PJs) are an elite unit of the U.S. Air Force Special Forces, specializing in combat search and rescue (CSAR) operations. PJs are trained to operate behind enemy lines, provide advanced medical care, and evacuate personnel in any conditions. Their motto is "That Others May Live."


More than forty hours passed from the moment of ejection to the moment of rescue. Forty hours, during which the loss of one man turned into a race between two armies, two intelligence systems, and two completely different notions of what it means to "leave no one behind."

Race


Iran responded immediately. State television IRIB broadcast messages offering a cash reward for the capture of the American pilot. The public was urged to actively participate in the search. At the same time, military authorities issued instructions not to harm the pilot and to ensure his "gentle" detention. Local residents were already flocking to the crash site as Iranian military convoys moved toward the pilot's presumed location.

The wounded pilot moved away from the crash site, navigated the mountainous terrain, and maintained intermittent contact with American forces via emergency radio beacons and walkie-talkies.

Trick


While the special forces were preparing for takeoff, the CIA launched a cover operation. American intelligence spread disinformation within Iran that US forces had allegedly already located the pilot and were evacuating him by land outside the country. This ruse misled Iranian search teams and bought them precious hours.

At the same time, the CIA determined the pilot's precise location and transmitted the coordinates to the Pentagon and the White House. Without this information, special forces operating in the difficult mountainous terrain covering hundreds of square miles would have faced an impossible task.

A combination of disinformation and accurate intelligence became the cornerstone of the entire operation.

Salvation


On the night of April 4–5, American forces launched the operation. The scale was impressive: hundreds of special operations troops, dozens of aircraft, a multi-layered intelligence architecture, including aerial reconnaissance, AI, and satellite surveillance.

Ground component The team consisted of operators from DEVGRU—SEAL Team 6, a frontline unit created in 1980 following the failure of Operation Eagle Claw—the botched attempt to rescue hostages in Iran that cost the lives of eight American soldiers and defined the US approach to special forces operations in the region for decades to come. Pararescue Jumpers operated in parallel.

Aviation cover provided by F-35 fighters operating in stealth mode to suppress Iranian air defenses and ensure air superiority over the operational area.

Intelligence led Drones The MQ-9 Reaper provides constant, real-time surveillance of both the pilot and approaching Iranian forces.

Delivery and logistics support The missions were carried out by MC-130J Commando II aircraft, capable of low-altitude flights in challenging mountainous terrain. They delivered the 160th Special Operations Aviation Regiment's helicopters—the "Night Stalkers"—to the forward airstrip.

The PJ has its own aviation infrastructure: drones, helicopters, attack UAVs, tiltrotor aircraft, and its own HC-130 tankers. All of this was used in the operation, making the rescue team a fully autonomous combat unit, rather than simply "passengers" on other helicopters.

Little Birds and Death from the Sky


The most unexpected element of the operation was the use of AH-6/MH-6 Little Bird light helicopters. These compact aircraft, more reminiscent of armed sport helicopters than combat aircraft, can be transported in the cargo bay of a C-130, deployed, and airborne in minutes.

At a makeshift airfield south of Isfahan, MC-130Js served as transporters, weapons depots, and refueling stations. Little Birds in AH-6 configuration provided fire support and airfield protection. In MH-6 configuration, they participated in the pilot's search and evacuation.


An AH-6 is rolled out of the cargo bay of an MC-130.

American attack aircraft carried out targeted strikes on Iranian convoys attempting to approach the pilot's location, effectively isolating the operational area and creating temporary corridors for evacuation teams. A video, purportedly filmed by eyewitnesses, shows gunfire from an aircraft that analysts have identified as an AH-6 Little Bird.

Price


The operation was successful, but its cost was significant.

Two C-130 transport aircraft. The aircraft landed on a makeshift airstrip in the desert to pick up the special forces and pilots. However, they were unable to take off from the ground. The Americans destroyed both aircraft themselves to prevent sensitive equipment—communications, navigation, and electronic warfare systems—from falling into enemy hands.


On the right is a damaged Little Bird, on the left is the wreck of a C-13.



A burned-out C-130 is visible in the background, and an H-6 rotor mast is in the foreground.


The debris field appears to be quite large.

Two Black Hawk helicopters. Iranian units hit two Black Hawks with ground fire. The crews survived, but the helicopters were lost. Photos from the scene, published on social media and analyzed by The War Zone, also showed the remains of two Little Bird helicopters among the wreckage.

A-10 Warthog attack aircraft. According to some reports, Iranian air defenses shot down an A-10 Thunderbolt II attack aircraft, but the pilot was evacuated. This marks the first confirmed kill of the famous "warthog" in this conflict.

Trump stated that there were no American casualties—all pilots and special forces operators were evacuated alive.

On the Iranian side, the picture is different. According to Iranian military and IRGC statements broadcast to state television, several "enemy aircraft" were destroyed during the operation. The IRGC disputes Washington's claims of a successful rescue, although the Iranian side has not provided evidence of the death or capture of the American pilot. Photos of the burning wreckage of the C-130 and helicopters, published by the Iranian side, however, confirm the American losses.

What does this say about modern warfare?


The F-15E pilot's rescue operation was a rare example in which all levels of modern military conflict were simultaneously on display.

Strategic level. The ability to retrieve one's own from deep within enemy territory is not only a moral imperative (the "leave no one behind") but also a strategic signal. A successful operation strengthens the confidence of aircrew: pilots who know they're coming for them act more decisively and take greater risks.

Operational levelThe integration of the CIA, DEVGRU, PJ, the 160th Airlift Wing, fifth-generation fighters, and unmanned reconnaissance aircraft into a single operation, deployed in a matter of hours, demonstrates a high level of interagency coordination.

Tactical level. Using the MC-130 to deliver helicopters to an improvised airfield, deploying the Little Bird in minutes, providing air cover, and destroying equipment during withdrawal—all of these are procedures that have been honed to the point of automatism, proven in dozens of exercises and real-world operations.

Weak spots


However, the operation also exposed vulnerabilities, and the scale of losses was significantly greater than initially reported by the American media. Two C-130s, two Black Hawks, two Little Birds, and one A-10—that's a significant loss of material for a single rescue mission.

Furthermore, the very fact of the destruction of the F-15E, A-10 and two Black Hawks indicates that the Iranian integrated air defense system remains capable of hitting American aircraft and helicopters even when operating at a significant distance from the coast.

The Iranian side demonstrated a contradictory response. On the one hand, the military claimed to have destroyed the American aircraft—and photographs partially confirm this. On the other hand, the very fact that the US managed to conduct such an operation deep inside Iranian territory poses a serious challenge for Tehran. If the enemy is capable of landing transport aircraft, establishing an airfield, delivering helicopters, providing them with refueling and air cover 200 miles from the coast, engaging Iranian units in a full-scale ground battle, and then withdrawing, this calls into question the effectiveness of the entire defense system.

Public declarations of the "failure" of the American operation, coupled with the lack of evidence of the pilot's death or capture, suggest that the Iranian side was unable to seize the initiative, despite its numerical superiority on the ground. Iran inflicted damage, but failed to achieve its primary objective—capturing a living American officer, who would have been a colossal propaganda and intelligence trophy.

How would other military powers carry out a similar operation?


Russia. The Russian Aerospace Forces possess search and rescue capabilities, including Mi-8AMTSh helicopters and Il-76 aircraft. However, Russia's experience in Syria has shown that coordination between different branches of the armed forces remains a significant challenge. An operation of similar complexity would have required much more preparation time and likely encountered difficulties in ensuring covert infiltration. As journalist Andrei Medvedev aptly noted on his Telegram channel:
“It’s ironic that the Americans didn’t take into account the training of the Iranian air defense forces and the Iranian military.
But to be honest, I don’t see any reason for irony here.

When our armed forces have a similar system for search and rescue teams, with not only their own helicopters (our teams do operate helicopters, yes), but also fighter jets, UAVs, attack aircraft, and transport aircraft, a unified command center, satellite communications and data transmission, and their own training center, then we will be able to indulgently mock.

For now, we’re just watching and realizing that there’s still work to be done.”

China. The People's Liberation Army of China is actively developing its special operations capabilities, but they remain primarily focused on regional conflicts. Conducting a covert operation deep within the territory of a serious adversary, requiring interagency coordination at the CIA-Pentagon level, remains beyond Beijing's current capabilities.

Israel. The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) is perhaps the closest to the American model. Experience in operating deep within enemy territory and the close integration of intelligence with combat units provide the foundation for such missions. However, the scale of the operation in Iran—hundreds of troops, dozens of aircraft, and multi-layered security—exceeds Israel's current capabilities for projecting force over such distances.

United Kingdom. The SAS and SBS are highly trained, and British intelligence, MI6, is traditionally strong in the Middle East. However, the Royal Air Force lacks the specialized platforms necessary to comprehensively support such an operation.

Conclusion


The F-15E pilot rescue operation is not easy story It's about the bravery of individuals, though there's plenty of bravery here. It's the story of a system capable of concentrating reconnaissance, aviation, special forces, and logistics in a single spot on a map of enemy territory within hours and extracting a single person alive.

The price turned out to be high: several pieces of equipment, each worth tens of millions of dollars. But the philosophy behind this price is simple and non-negotiable: technology can be replaced by technology, but people cannot be replaced by anything.

In 1980, in this same country, in these same mountains, American special forces suffered a crushing defeat—Operation Eagle Claw—ended with the deaths of eight soldiers in the desert near a place called Desert One. Forty-six years later, the successors of those who died then returned and completed the mission. With losses, but they accomplished it.

***
I'd like to clarify one more point: let no one be confused by the supposed ease with which the Americans outplayed the Iranians on their own field. In fact, the US won this match by experience: the CIA is a well-known agency with a huge human and technical staff: spies, intelligence officers, satellites, strategic drones and so on. And most importantly - a huge amount of experience, mostly successful.

As for paramedic-rescuers, that's a whole other story. These guys have been accumulating experience since 1943, that is, since World War II, when disparate army units, formed and trained almost entirely on a volunteer basis, rescued American pilots all over the world, from Germany to the Pacific Ocean. Then came Korea, Vietnam, and dozens of other conflicts, which ultimately allowed them to create one of the most advanced rescue services in the world.

Iran can console itself with the fact that, to save one pilot, the US deposited nearly $300 million worth of equipment on Iranian soil. That's also a pretty good option.
120 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. + 16
    April 6 2026 14: 49
    It is highly doubtful that the US did not lose people while losing so much equipment.
    1. -2
      April 6 2026 14: 57
      It seems like a photo of a burnt skull flashes, like that of a pilot in one of the planes.
      1. +3
        April 6 2026 15: 02
        Technicians lost 11 aircraft. Military Watch Magazine reports this, here's the link: https://inosmi.ru/20260406/poteri-277848677.html
        And the skull on the plane (according to the Iranian version) can be seen at this link:
        https://staryiy.livejournal.com/9384478.html
        1. 0
          April 6 2026 15: 08
          But whose is it and what about the evacuees?
          1. 0
            April 6 2026 18: 02
            Quote: Micha1981
            But whose is it and what about the evacuees?


            It's clear this is a murky business... If the Americans saw the skull (remains) of their pilot, why didn't they take it? After all, such images could have a negative impact on the US, and those involved in propaganda and similar topics should understand this.

            Is this really the skull of an American pilot? The Iranians, as far as I remember, have mastered AI imagery quite well... and are waging a powerful counter-propaganda campaign, so it's hard to trust anyone here.

            On the other hand, we did not see the bodies of the Americans killed in the collision with the Iranian Armed Forces, the bodies of the pilots (who could be identified)... so, if there were losses, then the American side evacuated the dead/wounded + special forces group, etc.

            P.S. Moreover, the skull is among the wreckage of the C-130, which the Americans themselves blew up... somehow the picture doesn’t add up here.
    2. -3
      April 6 2026 14: 59
      Yes, it turned out to be a rather slick fairy tale. It feels like trying to put a good face on a bad situation. Ultimately, even if they did evacuate someone, it all falls into the "give it all away, but don't disgrace the fleet" paradigm.
    3. SSR
      +6
      April 6 2026 19: 44
      Quote: rytik32
      It is highly doubtful that the US did not lose people while losing so much equipment.

      That's not really the point, I'll try to explain.

      Quote: rytik32
      Strategic level. The ability to retrieve one's own people from deep within enemy territory is not only a moral imperative (the "leave no one behind"),


      When planning, our people think at “their own level,” while the Americans, like good businessmen, are on the move.
      I don't remember the last name now, but when the first pocket calculator was created, many shook their heads, saying that the guy would never recoup his investment, but everything paid off, the guy was looking much further.
      So here, they assigned a bunch of other things to save one, completed the task and, in fact, everyone should learn.
      As we write, we will build the equipment, but we will not bring back the people.
      The main thing is that they didn't give up the equipment alive, they didn't give up the pilot, there's a theme for a Hollywood movie, and Trump is right about that. 😁


      This is short.
      1. 0
        April 6 2026 20: 04
        The scale is astounding, but even their skeptics write that such operations aren't carried out to save just one person; it was clearly a cover-up. An attempted landing.
        1. kig
          +1
          April 7 2026 13: 29
          Quote: Micha1981
          The scale is astounding

          An interesting map compiled by some concerned enthusiasts has appeared in the X-Files. However, the author doesn't explain how he identified the areas where the main events took place. Just in case, here's the abbreviations:

          CSAR: Combat Search and Rescue, that is, a special operation for search and rescue in combat conditions
          WSO LZ: weapon systems officer, pilot and second cabin crew, controls weapons.
          LZ: landing zone
          FARP: Forward Arming and Refueling Point, where helicopters and aircraft were abandoned.
          Herky: likely the call sign of HC-130 aircraft
          Littlebird; the MH-6 helicopter used in the operation.
          1. 0
            April 7 2026 13: 49
            Okay, but in general, what do their bloggers think about this?
    4. +2
      April 7 2026 03: 14
      Quote: rytik32
      It is highly doubtful that the US did not lose people while losing so much equipment.

      The groans began along the lines of "You're all lying! This can't happen!"
      1. -3
        April 7 2026 09: 10
        Quote: Puncher
        The groans began along the lines of "You're all lying! This can't happen!"

        How could it be otherwise, if the gentlemen suggest we take them at their word?
      2. +3
        April 7 2026 10: 33
        It's all pure psychology. When you're failing miserably, even though you've been bragging about being "wow," and your neighbor, who was also bragging, succeeds, and not just overnight, but after long and hard training, something you haven't done, what else is there to say?
    5. +1
      April 7 2026 07: 15
      It's begun... remember, just a week ago, at the Military District, and elsewhere, the same unbelievers stood their ground, declaring that "Americans don't fly over Iran, there's air defense there!" As it turns out, the only air defenses available are MANPADS, which are insurmountable... It turns out that an airfield can be set up 400 km away and searched by up to a dozen aircraft... but people like you will continue to scream, "That's impossible!"
      P.S.: I wonder where the author found the information about shooting down a Black Hawk? I only saw information about them being damaged by ground fire, and I saw a video of locals firing AKs and hunting rifles at them... and considering there are already tons of photos of the Americans "plowing up" even the roads with bombs, I don't think the Iranians had anything more serious than AKs.
      1. -2
        April 7 2026 09: 12
        Quote: parma
        It turned out that an airfield could be set up 400 km away and searches could be conducted by up to a dozen aircraft.

        Is there proof about a dozen sides?

        Quote: parma
        I don't think the Iranians had anything more serious than the AK.

        Did you see the holes in the plating? They clearly weren't from an AK!
        1. +1
          April 7 2026 10: 38
          From what we know for sure - 4 "Little Birds" + 2 C-130 for their delivery (these are the ones that were blown up while leaving), a C-130 was also caught on video as a refueling tanker for 2 "Black Hawks", there was also a shot down A-10, already a dozen...

          No, I haven't seen the photo, have you? Can you share it?
          1. 0
            April 7 2026 10: 55
            Quote: parma
            From what is known for sure

            This is a list of what was shot down. It's not a given that this equipment was able to participate in the search.

            Quote: parma
            Can you share?

            https://vk.com/wall-107986197_82730
            1. -1
              April 7 2026 11: 43
              Of the aircraft I listed, only the A-10 was shot down; the Americans destroyed two C-130s and four Black Hawks themselves. Another C-130 and two Black Hawks returned home with damage (likely due to ground fire from light infantry); there are no photos of them anywhere.
              The photo you provided shows the remains of the detonated weapon. The fact that it was a ground explosion suggests that if it had been in the air, the debris would have been scattered for hundreds of meters, if not kilometers. If it had been hit by artillery or multiple rocket launchers on the ground, there would have been craters from the misses. This means it was detonated either by charges on the ground or by a precision-guided missile, which is clearly not the work of the Iranians.
              Or you can believe that everyone was killed and everything is being covered up. But then the question arises: why would Iran hide the bodies?
              1. +1
                April 7 2026 11: 48
                Quote: parma
                the debris was scattered over hundreds of meters, if not kilometers

                This would have happened if the plane had disintegrated in mid-air. But what if it had landed damaged or had broken up on impact with the ground?


                Quote: parma
                Indicates a ground explosion

                If they had exploded on the ground, no one would have planted the shrapnel, traces of which are visible in the photo.
                1. -1
                  April 7 2026 11: 55
                  Okay, where are the bodies or their fragments? Where are the soldiers' personal weapons and equipment, anyway? There's a photo of Iranians posing against the wreckage with a captured machine-gun belt and a NUR rocket, just like from a Little Bird. How did they survive the crash? I think they were simply piled up in the helicopter reloading area and then abandoned as unnecessary. The shootdown theory is too flimsy, based solely on a desire to do so...
                  1. 0
                    April 7 2026 12: 01
                    Quote: parma
                    Where are the fighters' personal weapons/equipment anyway?

                    I have no doubt that the fighters and weapons were evacuated.
                    1. 0
                      April 7 2026 12: 19
                      Wait, who was evacuated if you think the transport planes were shot down? Where are the bodies/fragments of those who were on them? Also, if the planes landed with such damage that takeoff was impossible, then how did the helicopters perform? There were more than two planes, and only some were able to take off. Why send additional planes? Wouldn't it have been easier to abandon the helicopters and evacuate the people on the remaining ones? Basically, alternative theories raise more questions than answers, and the answers only exist because people want them to.
                      1. +1
                        April 7 2026 12: 26
                        I have very little information to build my own theories. But the version presented above is far-fetched. It doesn't explain
                        1. Where do the signs of damage come from?
                        2. Why did they abandon helicopters that could have reached Kuwait?
                        The version presented in the article is not supported by anything other than words.
                        Why not show a pilot being rescued? Planes and helicopters taking off and landing?
                      2. 0
                        April 7 2026 12: 47
                        There is an answer to this question:
                        1) The Americans claim that it was destroyed by an air strike, but even if there was an explosion on the ground, there was clearly more than one explosion, fragments from nearby equipment.
                        2) the MH-6's passport flight range, so even if they had reached the nearest "allied territory" (which is the Iraqi border, ~400 km away), the risk is too great
                        3) They might show it again, it's been a while. While they're taking him to the hospital, the medics will be working, etc. In the end, he might have refused for an hour.
                        4) Photos/videos of rescuers' work may be confidential, and they flew away on one plane and returned on another.
                        So the official version is quite viable and there are facts in its favor, but the version about something being shot down or even more so about a failure has no facts yet.
                      3. 0
                        April 7 2026 13: 16
                        Quote: parma
                        So the official version is quite viable and there are facts in its favor.

                        The point is that there are no facts.
                        The existence of burned aircraft is a fact. But how it ended up there and how it was destroyed are pure speculation.
                        The pilot's rescue has not yet been confirmed by anyone.
                      4. 0
                        April 7 2026 13: 30
                        Quote: parma
                        Moreover, there are no facts about the failure yet

                        And another important fact: only one pilot seat was found. Where is the other seat?
                        If no one has found the second seat, then most likely no one has found the second pilot either, well, maybe with the exception of jackals or other animals.
                2. 0
                  April 7 2026 12: 41
                  All the "shot down" ones fell into one spot the size of a baseball field in this steppe?
                  And the holes could have been from high-altitude bombs or from fragmentation grenade launchers, if the special forces had fired.
                  The helicopters were abandoned because they had dealt with the Persians and needed to be refueled again.
                  1. +1
                    April 7 2026 13: 11
                    Quote: Tlauicol
                    All the "shot down" ones fell into one spot the size of a baseball field in this steppe?

                    I'm not saying that all the equipment was shot down.

                    Quote: Tlauicol
                    And the holes could have been from high-altitude bombs.

                    There are many photos and videos of that place - there are no bomb craters.
                    Quote: Tlauicol
                    from fragmentation grenade launchers

                    the grenade launcher doesn't produce such large fragments
                    1. 0
                      April 7 2026 13: 17
                      Then where is the photo of the one who was hit?
                      They didn't use concrete piercers, they probably used fragmentation bombs. One would have been enough. Or they blew it up from the inside.
                      What grenade launcher, RPG-7? Yeah, it doesn't. What about the Carl Gustav? + combustion
                      1. 0
                        April 7 2026 13: 27
                        Quote: Tlauicol
                        Then where is the photo of the one hit?

                        I posted it above

                        Quote: Tlauicol
                        And Carl Gustav? + burning

                        Its striking elements are 3mm diameter balls. Are you kidding?
                      2. 0
                        April 7 2026 13: 33
                        You have already been told above that these are the remains of something that exploded.
                        The grenade launcher is just the latest version. Fire will make the holes bigger. The main version is bombs.
                      3. 0
                        April 7 2026 13: 47
                        Quote: Tlauicol
                        The main version is bombs.

                        Then show me the bomb craters.
                        Quote: Tlauicol
                        The fire will increase the holes

                        If aluminum starts to burn, it will burn all over, not just the holes.
                      4. 0
                        April 7 2026 13: 59
                        The bomb exploded in mid-air. So as not to throw it twice. They could have used explosives.
                        It's easier to show the Persians mountains of corpses.
                        What, didn't all the aluminum burn up? Are you fed up or tired?
                      5. +1
                        April 7 2026 14: 03
                        Colleague, back off, you can't fix the hunchback yourself...
                        Well, it's already clear that the Iranians were bribed by the Americans not to show the bodies, otherwise it would damage their image... just like they once bought confirmation from the Soviet leadership that Kubrick's filming was the moon landing...
                      6. +1
                        April 7 2026 14: 06
                        Our main problem is the lack of critical thinking among 99% of the population.
                        And the roads
                      7. 0
                        April 7 2026 14: 12
                        Quote: Tlauicol
                        The bomb exploded in the air

                        From which detonator?

                        Quote: Tlauicol

                        What, didn't all the aluminum burn up? Are you fed up or tired?

                        Where aluminum burned, it burned...
                      8. 0
                        April 7 2026 14: 25
                        I see you have nothing better to do anyway. You, well, take some aluminum, kerosene, and matches. And burn it. Maybe it will work.
    6. 0
      April 7 2026 11: 07
      Quote: rytik32
      It is highly doubtful that the US did not lose people while losing so much equipment.

      The American version, which the site so carefully laid out for us, is entirely dubious. The transport planes left there empty? Why?! And so on. This whole thing is as close to a working theory as a pig is to a ballerina.
      1. 0
        April 7 2026 11: 47
        What makes you think they left empty-handed? The official version is that two C-130s carrying light helicopters and special forces landed first. The helicopters picked up the pilot, but it turned out the planes couldn't take off with the cargo (probably even without the helicopters, due to landing gear damage, for example). Then they sent in lighter passenger (!) propeller-driven planes and evacuated the crew, and blew up the equipment.
        P.S.: I understand that people really want an American failure, but I'm afraid that desire will be the only thing that matters...
        1. 0
          April 7 2026 13: 11
          Because the transport planes are in smoke, and there are supposedly no casualties. That is, they're empty. Well, if you don't take the American official nonsense seriously, but think about it and assume that this whole thing was a landing operation (which is logical, the Persians have an interesting little airfield nearby), and you plowed everything there to hide your losses... And so on.
          1. +1
            April 7 2026 13: 45
            I still don't understand what's so special about the equipment being blown up during the retreat and no losses? If the equipment can't be removed, are you suggesting we leave it to the enemy, like ours left tanks for the Ukrainians in 2022?
            1. 0
              April 7 2026 16: 36
              The equipment wasn't blown up. It was thoroughly destroyed by bombs and missiles. Anyway, you're fully aware of that. I'm kind of too lazy to get into a fight with the liberals these days...
              1. 0
                April 8 2026 07: 11
                It's funny how you throw around cliches... oh well... apparently what's the fundamental difference in the method of blowing up your own equipment during retreat - with charges on the ground or from the air, or how this is connected with personnel losses, I won't hear... you idiots, what can you expect from you
  2. +6
    April 6 2026 14: 51
    I predict that Hollywood will soon make a heroic film about this.
    1. 0
      April 6 2026 15: 06
      Hollywood doesn't film much these days, and what it does film is done abroad... It's desolate there... I predict they won't make the film.
      1. SSR
        -1
        April 6 2026 19: 56
        Quote: Smoker
        It's desolate there... I predict they won't make a movie about it.

        They'll take it off.
        Hero pilot 3-21ras, rescuers combat brotherhood 3-21sovs of Epstein's army.
        All for the good of the world.
        Here.)))
        The push-push trumpet will be pushed through.
  3. + 12
    April 6 2026 14: 55
    Amazing article
    Unexpected for the format of a Russian resource with a patriotic focus
    But yes, it fits the theme of military analysis perfectly.

    On the topic, let's hope that each such operation is thoroughly analyzed not only by resources like this one, but also by the General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces. And the necessary lessons are learned.
    1. + 10
      April 6 2026 19: 53
      Quote from sdivt
      On the topic, let's hope that each such operation is thoroughly analyzed not only by resources like this one, but also by the General Staff of the Russian Armed Forces. And the necessary lessons are learned.

      Honestly, I also hope, but I don't really believe, that the General Staff will even bother analyzing this. After all, they warned that strategic airfields are practically defenseless. So what? TWO strikes on strategic airfields and a strike on AWACS, unfortunately successful for the enemy. The same goes for Ust-Luga. The Ukrainians have been hitting oil refineries and infrastructure for a whole year, and still, almost half the port is burned down!!! Of course, it's impossible to protect everything, but they can shoot down drones over Estonia, damn it, but no. How can they avoid provoking a conflict? It's precisely the lack of any response that leads to escalation!!!
      1. +6
        April 6 2026 20: 43
        Quote: nedgen
        To be honest, I also hope, but I don’t really believe that the General Staff will scratch their heads and start analyzing.

        It's April, we need to get ready for the Parade.
        1. 0
          April 7 2026 17: 08
          Yes, the Parade is coming soon, we'll have another blast. As for the article, here's the deal: some people will envy the Americans for saving their own, while others will be angry at them for doing so.
          I personally envy you, because we were unable to save our downed pilots in Ukraine.
    2. +1
      April 6 2026 21: 33
      I'm sick and tired of this admonition about how we should learn from the Americans and rescue our own pilots. As if such operations hadn't been carried out before. Let me remind you. The rescue of a Russian navigator shot down by an Su-24 in Syria. A film was made, I think it's called "Sky." The rescue of the future General Rutskoy, who piloted an Su-25 in Afghanistan. They even managed to pull him out from under the noses of the thugs with a damaged spine. He wasn't so lucky the second time. He crashed in Pakistan and was captured, but was exchanged. As for this operation, everything is still unclear. The Americans have never shown the rescued pilot. But they lost God knows how many aircraft. And I don't believe there were no losses.
  4. The comment was deleted.
  5. -2
    April 6 2026 14: 59
    The pilot was rescued. The striped ones will have something to sweat about. But the Iranians won in this situation.
  6. +2
    April 6 2026 14: 59
    The scale of the rescue operation, involving so many forces, is truly extraordinary. It's just that the Yankees don't fight that often, don't lose aircraft that often, and have tons of money, powerful intelligence, and a vast array of aircraft.
    1. -1
      April 6 2026 15: 08
      Rather, they wanted to carry out a raid under her guise.
    2. +3
      April 6 2026 15: 24
      So maybe their system allows for more efficient use of the armed forces, without massive losses of people and equipment?

      We have a lot to learn in this matter.
    3. +1
      April 6 2026 15: 24
      The scale of the rescue operation, involving so many forces, is truly extraordinary.

      Remember the Oscar-winning film Saving Private Ryan...
      1. 0
        April 7 2026 10: 54
        The film "Behind Enemy Lines" from 2001 with Mashkov would be more suitable here.
  7. +7
    April 6 2026 15: 00
    Well, what can I say, I can only envy such an organization. If everything is as described. I wish ours could do the same.
  8. The comment was deleted.
  9. -6
    April 6 2026 15: 04
    Schwarzenegger would be a better actor than Trump as the savior. What idiots! Their Hollywood movie is a horror film where children are murdered. Now they boast of honor and bravery, when in reality they are nothing but criminal pedophiles. Lies lead nowhere. The script was written after the movie came out, and no sane person would believe them.
  10. 0
    April 6 2026 15: 04
    The IRGC disputes Washington's claims of a successful rescue, although the Iranian side has not provided evidence of the death or capture of the American pilot.
    To be fair, the Americans didn't present anything either. Moreover, the Iranians discovered a charred skull among the plane wreckage.
    1. +3
      April 6 2026 15: 14
      It seems it was a reconnaissance mission, but it failed, so they had to limit themselves to PR. It's not even a fact that the pilot's body was found.
  11. The comment was deleted.
  12. -6
    April 6 2026 15: 18
    I didn't read it, but a lot has been written. And they must be real heroes. Yes, we can't compare to them.
  13. -3
    April 6 2026 15: 30
    If we talk not about the military but the political and ideological side of the issue, then against the background
    The US President's statements that the war was already won are simply an epic failure.
    Losing nine aircraft worth a third of a billion dollars after winning is simply impossible.
    This means that President Trump is either lying or incompetent.
  14. -3
    April 6 2026 15: 31
    There's just one thing I don't understand: did they find their pilot?
    Or is this article exactly that same CIA disinformation?
  15. -1
    April 6 2026 15: 34
    Quote: rytik32
    It is highly doubtful that the US did not lose people while losing so much equipment.

    I have a question: where did the 19 pilots go with the equipment packed with Iranians? fool wassat The transport couldn't take off, okay, where did they go?
    In short: "Black Hawk Down" 2-0, a spectacular film, but dumb. It might have been prestigious for the Iranians to publicly execute the pilot, but judging by the remainder, they were planning on racking up the kill, not chasing down the American colonel, Skalolal? laughing
    1. +3
      April 6 2026 17: 54
      Quote: alexputnik17
      I have a question: where did the 19 pilots go with the Iranian-packed aircraft? The transport couldn't take off, okay, where did they go?


      If we follow the logic, they were evacuated together with the special forces group... it is doubtful that they remained "on the ground" when the Americans took their own.

      I haven't seen any prisoners or bodies of dead Americans online, at least not that I've seen... there's a photo of the pilot's skull, but how accurate is that? If the Americans saw him, why didn't they take the skull (remains)? Or is this the work of AI and Iranian propaganda? Overall, this photo raises many questions.
  16. -2
    April 6 2026 15: 35
    How would other military powers carry out a similar operation?
    Russia. The Russian Aerospace Forces have search and rescue capabilities, including Mi-8AMTSh helicopters and Il-76 aircraft. However, Russia's experience in Syria has shown that Coordination between different branches of the armed forces remains a significant problem.

    And we saw this from the experience of evacuating soldiers from the territory of the SVO...
    And these are only the known cases when soldiers were left without real assistance for weeks (possibly listed as missing in action)...
    As for the US Army, let them all die there - I don't care...
  17. 0
    April 6 2026 15: 54
    Well done, they pulled one of their own out. They're the only ones capable of conducting such operations now; the rest have neither the money nor the equipment. I just imagined what our army would be like if it had American funding. Oh, those fantasies.
    1. +2
      April 6 2026 20: 07
      Quote: Seneca
      Well done guys, you pulled yours out,

      It's a mixed bag. Last time, not only did they fail to pull us out, but they also left eight "rescuers" lying horizontal. And no one tried to get to them. This time, we got lucky, but it was a bit pricey.
      Quote: Seneca
      Now only they can carry out such operations, the rest have neither money nor technology.

      Our forces carried out a similar operation in 2015 in Syria, when the Turks shot down our Su-24.
      Then one pilot died, and the second pilot was found and evacuated from under the noses of the Turkmens and ISIS bandits.
      More details here -
      https://iov75.livejournal.com/3877327.html
      1. 0
        April 6 2026 20: 47
        Quote: Nyrobsky
        Our forces carried out a similar operation in 2015 in Syria, when the Turks shot down our Su-24.

        Or they could have simply allocated a couple of Sukhoi fighters for cover. And, most likely, there wouldn't have been a "stab in the back."
        1. +2
          April 6 2026 22: 58
          Quote: Cympak
          Quote: Nyrobsky
          Our forces carried out a similar operation in 2015 in Syria, when the Turks shot down our Su-24.

          Or they could have simply allocated a couple of Sukhoi fighters for cover. And, most likely, there wouldn't have been a "stab in the back."

          Why discuss after the fact what could have been done or how it should have been done, when the event itself has already occurred and we are left to accept it as it is? And in fact, that's how it happened, and we ensured the co-pilot's rescue. The man claims that no one other than mattresses can perform such operations, which is untrue.
      2. 0
        April 8 2026 12: 05
        If a pilot crashes somewhere near Chernigov, do you think you can do something similar now?
        1. 0
          April 8 2026 14: 36
          Quote: Seneca
          If a pilot crashes somewhere near Chernigov, do you think you can do something similar now?

          What if there were no ifs? Our pilot was shot down in Syria, and he was rescued. An American was shot down in Iran, and he was also rescued. Both incidents occurred in enemy-controlled territory. Neither Syria nor Iran are Russian or American territory, so the rescuers faced equal risk.
          1. 0
            April 8 2026 14: 40
            Well, if without if, they won’t do that now.
            1. 0
              April 8 2026 18: 55
              Quote: Seneca
              Well, if without if, they won’t do that now.

              And how will they do it? Here's another version of this "successful" US operation, and it's probably closer to the truth:
              https://colonelcassad.livejournal.com/10464321.html
              1. +1
                April 10 2026 11: 49
                I'm talking about our guys not being so concerned, maybe I'm wrong, I'd like to be wrong, I'm just wondering if they'll pull me out if I end up in trouble, it's very doubtful.
                1. 0
                  April 10 2026 14: 06
                  Quote: Seneca
                  I'm talking about ours not being so concerned, maybe I'm wrong, I'd like to be wrong
                  Rescuing a soldier from captivity or imprisonment, alive or dead, is the duty of the commander and the state. And it works, because without certainty, the soldier loses motivation to go on a mission. Whether or not commanders and the state can accomplish this is ultimately determined by circumstances and the situation on the ground.
                  Quote: Seneca
                  I'm wondering if I'll end up in trouble. It's very doubtful whether they'll pull me out.

                  Of course, it's better to never end up in one, but that's a matter of personal choice. However, no one will abandon you to your fate. There will be attempts to rescue you, but whether they can be rescued is another matter. It happens that contact is lost, and the group is presumed dead at the base; then there really can be a snag, but it's not intentional.
  18. 0
    April 6 2026 16: 22
    Quote: Seneca
    Well done guys, they pulled one of their own out, now they are the only ones who can carry out such operations, the rest have neither the money nor the equipment

    That's when they show it...
  19. +4
    April 6 2026 16: 22
    Two C-130s, two Black Hawks, two Little Birds and one A-10 down...
    So, how did they evacuate the PJ special forces search and rescue teams with the ejected F-15 operator? recourse

    It seems to me that if this Air Force colonel had really been rescued from the downed Oryol, he would have been presented to the Americans and the world long ago; for the sake of such PR, he would have been awarded the rank of general and promoted to headquarters...

    And so, yes, we take gentlemen at their word.
  20. 0
    April 6 2026 17: 40
    While the special forces were preparing for takeoff, the CIA launched a covert operation

    It seems the IRGC simply decided to play along with the CIA, without actually trying to capture the pilot. Why look for the pilot if his rescuers find him and expose themselves? Then they'll just ambush everyone together.
  21. +7
    April 6 2026 17: 49
    Although the Iranian side did not provide evidence of the death or capture of the American pilot.

    The American side has not yet provided evidence of the pilots' rescue.
    The Iranian side was unable to seize the initiative, despite its numerical superiority on the ground. Iran inflicted damage, but failed to achieve its main objective—capturing a living American officer, who would have been a colossal propaganda and intelligence trophy.

    Where did you get the information about this location? Is it located near the Iranian border, in the mountains among Kurds or similar populations? It's likely that US bases are much closer than Iranian ones in this area, and the Americans and their proxies temporarily had numerical superiority. And what's so valuable about this unfortunate pilot, especially if he's seriously wounded and disabled?
    The panicked flight of US forces, accompanied by the bombing of aircraft, on the contrary shows how great the risk of such ground operations is.
    And even if US manned aircraft enter Iranian airspace, it is very rare and only near the borders and over hard-to-reach areas.
    1. +1
      April 7 2026 03: 25
      Americans are gentlemen, and gentlemen should be taken at their word. laughing
  22. +2
    April 6 2026 18: 12
    Quote: Aleksandr21
    It is doubtful that they remained "on the ground" when the Americans took their own.

    I understand that... And how were they evacuated?
    1. +1
      April 6 2026 18: 33
      An ATR-72 has arrived. I've never seen a stranger version than this one. smile
  23. The comment was deleted.
  24. +2
    April 6 2026 18: 15
    Okay, let's take the Americans' word for it that way.
    Question: How many more such evacuations will the equipment last? 5, 10? And how will they rescue the downed pilots of, say, No. 12?
  25. +1
    April 6 2026 18: 16
    $100-150 million for a single pilot, not counting the F-15, will go down in the record books as the world's most expensive pilot. Helicopters and A-10s were shot down and no one was hurt, so yeah, we believe it.
  26. +1
    April 6 2026 18: 42
    Quote: dzvero
    An ATR-72 has arrived. I've never seen a stranger version than this one.

    So... Hercules planes couldn't take off, but this one did. I get it, the fog of war... well, so-so. And the Americans didn't finish the story logically, and the Persians didn't seem to offer any explanation. Then again, why would they land such a plane from some RPG? wassat
  27. +1
    April 6 2026 18: 46
    Quote: Victor Sergeev
    $100-150 million for a single pilot, not counting the F-15, will go down in the record books as the world's most expensive pilot. Helicopters and A-10s were shot down and no one was hurt, so yeah, we believe it.

    Western media reported that the Iranians had amassed $0,5 billion worth of aircraft...
    I wondered if the Americans had set up a Gostomel field there. They wouldn't have let our planes land or take off there.
  28. -3
    April 6 2026 19: 25
    I do not understand anything
    The F-15E crew consists of two members, but for some reason all the articles keep repeating that only one pilot was saved, and this one is no exception.
    I understand that he is a real colonel and therefore is first in line for rescue, but where did the second one go?
    1. 0
      April 7 2026 03: 22
      The first one was rescued immediately, the second one two days later.
  29. +2
    April 6 2026 19: 32
    The F-15E pilot's rescue isn't just a story of individual bravery, though there's plenty of it. It's a story of a system capable of concentrating reconnaissance, air power, special forces, and logistics support in a single spot on a map of enemy territory within hours and extracting a survivor.
    After losing so much equipment, they didn't lose anyone? Seriously? And have they found the pilot yet? They reported yesterday that no one had seen him.
  30. 0
    April 6 2026 19: 50
    I would like to discuss how justified such operations are.

    Justified if you're dealing with an enemy that's obviously weaker than you, which is what the US waged its wars against. But with Iran, this operation was more of a fluke; they learned the hard way that Iran isn't Venezuela for them, although of course it was useful for them to know that if something like this happens in the future, they should think a hundred times before carrying out such operations.

    Does PR justify the losses? I don't think so. The interested parties, including the pilots, are well aware that the American media is lying about the personnel losses and understand the cost of rescuing this pilot.

    They realize and understand that his salvation was largely a stroke of luck. In my understanding, the US air force command, which had been bombing Iran from a respectful distance until now, decided it was time to cut him off, and they paid for it. This episode will mean that the Americans will not behave so brazenly in the skies over Iran for the time being.
    1. +1
      April 6 2026 21: 50
      Quote: Sergey Mitinsky

      Does PR for the result justify the losses?

      Here it might be the other way around - they are trying to justify the accumulated losses with PR.
      As if all this came crashing down because of "Private Ryan".
  31. +4
    April 6 2026 20: 07
    A good fairy tale for Trump.
    But there is another picture
    Iranian air defenses shot down two UH-60 helicopters, two MQ-9 drones, an A-10 attack aircraft, presumably providing air cover, and an Israeli Hermes 900 reconnaissance drone supporting the operation, all flying at low altitude over the country's territory. Shortly after the clashes, two more videos were released and widely publicized, showing two Black Hawks crashing. The list of losses also included two HC-130J Combat King II search and rescue aircraft and two MH-6 helicopters, which landed in Iran and, according to American sources, were unable to take off.

    If everything were as described in the fairy tale, Trump would be shining like the bright sun.
    But Trump started to get hysterical and swear.
    Judging by Trump's reaction, the second version (Iran beat them up) is more plausible (and the photo confirms it).
    P.S. There's a theory that it wasn't about rescuing the pilot, but rather about an attempt to steal 400 kg of enriched uranium.
    But, again, all the geldings failed.
    Neither the pilots (there are coals from them in the photo) nor the uranium were ever recovered, but they lost about 10 aircraft and dozens of special forces.
    Trump has reason to be angry.
  32. 0
    April 6 2026 20: 31
    The article is interesting, but the conclusion is cluttered. Moreover, the rescue of the US pilot was never confirmed—it wasn't worth writing about. Rather, it was some failed attempt to achieve some goal (with no known success), justified by the pilot's mythical evacuation. And the conclusion that "the price of millions can justify the inestimable life of a person who cannot be replaced" seems especially cynical given reports of fragments of military remains found in the US aircraft destroyed by the Americans.
  33. 0
    April 6 2026 20: 48
    It's not written that three Bombardiers, similar to our An-24s, were used to evacuate this entire, now horseless, horde. They flew in and out covertly. It must be acknowledged that, to this day, the Iranians don't fully control their territory, and the location of the Iranians' improvised airfield has never been identified. Otherwise, why wasn't the UAV activity concentrated there?
  34. 0
    April 6 2026 21: 07
    Quote: Sergey Mitinsky
    I understand that he is a real colonel and therefore is first in line for rescue, but where did the second one go?

    The second one (according to the truthful words of the Americans) was saved earlier.
  35. +1
    April 6 2026 21: 34
    If everything had been alright with the pilots, the Americans would have made a big deal out of their return. That's not the case. That means something didn't go as smoothly as they'd hoped.
  36. -1
    April 7 2026 02: 02
    Iran can console itself with the fact that, to save one pilot, the US deposited nearly $300 million worth of equipment on Iranian soil. That's also a pretty good option.


    Someone on the pages of the Military News Agency claimed that airborne operations had outlived their usefulness and the Airborne Forces should be disbanded. This is a clear example of how to secure a corridor for transport aircraft and provide air support for ground units. While not everything went smoothly, they reached their target without losses. Airborne operations need to be properly prepared, not just hoped for a "lucky break" and everyone would be lucky and losses would be minimal. It's important to consider that the operation was carried out from territories located very far from US borders, yet they managed to suppress ground-based air defense systems.
    1. 0
      April 7 2026 03: 21
      Quote from Eugene Zaboy
      that airborne operations have become obsolete and the Airborne Forces should be disbanded

      This was not a parachute landing.
      Quote from Eugene Zaboy
      It is important to take into account that the operation was carried out from territories located very far from the US borders, and yet they managed to suppress ground-based air defense systems.

      They managed to isolate the area, ensuring the safety of landing and takeoff.
      Well, of course, this is progress; in 1991, during this time, 16 pilots were already in Iraqi captivity.
      1. +1
        April 7 2026 14: 01
        Quote: Puncher
        This was not a parachute landing.


        Does this matter? Landing transport planes carries greater risks than dropping paratroopers. And the point of my comment is to provide high-quality air cover for the landing force, not the goal.

        Quote: Puncher
        Well, of course, this is progress.


        Saving the lives of the operation's participants, even if only through technology, is undoubtedly progress and a high-quality support for the operation. Love the Americans or hate them, their achievements must be studied, mastered, and applied.
    2. +2
      April 7 2026 03: 22
      We reached our target without losses, but how did we fly away from it?
      1. 0
        April 7 2026 14: 10
        Quote: Grencer81
        We reached our target without losses, but how did we fly away from it?


        You have to be able to fly without losses, and you have to learn how to do that. Even if they haven't mastered the return operation, that means they need to figure out where the mistakes were and take them into account.
        1. 0
          April 7 2026 17: 40
          "Before you enter somewhere, you need to think about how you will get out."
          Captain Eliseev V.V., deputy political officer of the separate engineering and sapper company of the KTP, Nakhodka.
          And judging by the losses, they didn’t think much about it.
          1. 0
            April 7 2026 23: 08
            Quote: Grencer81
            "Before you enter somewhere, you need to think about how you will get out."
            Captain Eliseev V.V., deputy political officer of the separate engineering and sapper company of the KTP, Nakhodka.
            And judging by the losses, they didn’t think much about it.


            I couldn't find any reliable information about American casualties in this operation. If they had been serious and the operation a failure, the US Democrats would have already sounded the alarm and impeached Trump. You don't believe such a development is possible? But the Western press is silent on the matter. Are they conspiring?
            1. 0
              April 8 2026 07: 46
              What, has the US Army already abolished secrecy?
              1. 0
                April 8 2026 07: 58
                Quote: Grencer81
                What, has the US Army already abolished secrecy?


                Democrats, like Republicans, serve in the highest levels of US government and have security clearances high enough to have information about what's happening in Iran. They're digging deep to bring down Trump, but here, such a potential opportunity is looming large, and they'll pass it by if it exists. Impossible!
                1. 0
                  April 8 2026 08: 45
                  It's entirely possible, otherwise, for disclosing information that is considered secret, you could get a hefty dose of the drug "Zvezdyulina."
                  And no one will care whether you are a democrat or who else.
                  1. 0
                    April 8 2026 12: 25
                    Quote: Grencer81
                    It's entirely possible, otherwise, for disclosing information that is considered secret, you could get a hefty dose of the drug "Zvezdyulina."
                    And no one will care whether you are a democrat or who else.


                    Congress and the Senate have special committees that review matters related to secrecy. They decide how and under what pretext classified information should be presented to the public. Anyone who has lost will, if necessary, leak it for the sake of victory.
          2. The comment was deleted.
          3. 0
            April 8 2026 00: 12
            Quote: Grencer81
            "Before you enter somewhere, you need to think about how you will get out."
            Captain Eliseev V.V., deputy political officer of the separate engineering and sapper company of the KTP, Nakhodka.
            And judging by the losses, they didn’t think much about it.


            US Hercules military transport aircraft landed in Iran. Yes, the Americans destroyed the equipment they couldn't retrieve, but there are no signs of combat (craters, shell casings, bodies, etc.) at the landing site, or none have been published. Therefore, Iranian armed forces arrived at the site after an evacuation. They don't even know where the Americans went or how they evacuated. You, apparently, don't know either. This speaks to the high-quality preparation of the operation and the absence of information leaks. The operation was carried out against the backdrop of a war between the US and Iran that lasted several weeks.
            We draw conclusions:
            Airborne operations are possible, necessary, and the Russian Airborne Forces need to be developed to the level of their use without significant losses in personnel.
  37. +1
    April 7 2026 03: 22
    And who believes the American fairy tales that everything went without losses in personnel?
  38. 0
    April 7 2026 05: 05
    It would be nice, because part of it is Wikipedia, and part is the author’s own thoughts “on the topic”.
    request
    At the same time, the CIA determined the pilot's precise location and transmitted the coordinates to the Pentagon and the White House. Without this information, special forces operating in the difficult mountainous terrain covering hundreds of square miles would have faced an impossible task.
    The CIA isn't doing "this" in parallel. The author writes about the Air Force Rescue Coordination Center—why should the CIA invent anything? The CIA has its own "field."
    request
    The ground component consisted of operators from DEVGRU, SEAL Team 6.
    Theoretically, it's possible, but in practice, since there were clearly LittleBirds of the 160th NightStalkers regiment - and they train with Delta - "boots on the ground" was Delta (no one will strengthen the hypothetical Shinnik team with attackers from hypothetical Dynamo before the decisive match).
    "Establishing a perimeter" at the VVP is the army's rangers; this has been their standard practice since Afghanistan.
    And before the general landing begins, AFSOC - Air Force Special Forces - are deployed, responsible for the runway (suitable/not suitable), air traffic control and air support.
    The C130s land, roll out the Little Bird, provide ammunition, fuel and other supplies, and medical support (two operating rooms with surgeons, like the 86th Medical Squadron).
    160SOAR and Delta are terrorizing everyone around them (the "rules of engagement" can define the enemy as "armed" - and who is there? No. walks without a weapon?), they find the pilot and evacuate him.
    Fuel, damaged equipment and ammunition are not being reloaded - "a flying circus" wassat "curls up and flies away."
    PJ most likely took out the first pilot; the operation on the second one is not quite their profile.
    Two Black Hawk helicopters. Iranian units shot down two Black Hawks with ground fire.
    Where does this even come from? request
    How would other military powers carry out a similar operation?
    laughing - "Science fiction in another department"
    ...beat the Iranians on their own turf. In fact, the US won this match by experience: the CIA is a well-known organization with a huge human and technical staff: spies, intelligence officers, satellites, strategic drones, and so on.
    What does the CIA have to do with it again? They have their own "toys" and their own "type of the spear/Virginia Army."
    request
  39. The comment was deleted.
  40. +2
    April 7 2026 08: 45
    Well described, but there's one problem: there's no video of the pilot! Even though everyone announced his capture, both Iran and the Americans.
    Until there is video and confirmation, we can safely assume the pilot is dead and the body has not been found.
    1. +3
      April 7 2026 09: 35
      Moreover, there is a precedent: in 1991, the only plane shot down by an Iraqi pilot died; the plane crashed in the desert, and the body was found in 2009.
    2. 0
      April 7 2026 14: 17
      Quote: APASUS
      Until there is video and confirmation, we can safely assume the pilot is dead and the body has not been found.

      No one has seen the second pilot's seat yet. If the Iranians had found it, they would have shown it, just like the first seat. And if it still hasn't been found, then...
  41. +1
    April 7 2026 14: 23
    Great article - I even applaud it with my feet!!
    essentially there is 0 information
    but all the countries of the world that have large forces and coordination capabilities - will fall on their faces before the Yankees!?
    maybe there will be proof?
  42. 0
    April 7 2026 19: 45
    A burned-out C-130 is visible in the background, and an H-6 rotor mast is in the foreground.

    Let me translate it into Russian: ... on the front are the remains of the N-6 main rotor.
  43. 0
    April 7 2026 22: 08
    The question arises: if a bunch of people were brought in on two transport planes, and then the planes were burned, then what did this bunch of people fly away on?
  44. 0
    April 7 2026 23: 39
    I recalled the words of a Russian conflict veteran: "The Motherland will not forget you, yes! But it will not remember you either!"
  45. 0
    April 8 2026 03: 25
    Iran didn't show the American pilot, but America showed the rescued one?