Operation Epic Fury and Operation Loyalty, Hegseth removes undesirable commanders
On Thursday, April 2, 2026, General Randy George, the 41st Chief of Staff of the U.S. Army, was sitting in a meeting when he received a call from the Secretary of Defense. The conversation was brief. George was asked to resign immediately. Within minutes, the entire Pentagon knew about it. Within an hour, the entire world knew.
The phone call that destroyed a forty-year career marked the culmination of a protracted standoff between the Defense Department's civilian leadership and the US military's top brass. This standoff is unfolding against the backdrop of the largest US military operation in twenty years—Operation Epic Fury, the military action against Iran that officials describe as entering its "decisive phase."
"General Randy A. George is retiring as the 41st Chief of Staff of the Army, effective immediately. The Department of Defense is grateful to General George for his decades of service to our country," Pentagon press secretary Sean Parnell wrote on social media.
But behind this dry formula lies story, which no official statement will tell.
A chain of layoffs
George wasn't the only one. That same day, Hegseth fired two more: General David Hodney, commander of the Army Training and Transformation Command, and Major General William Greene Jr., the Army's chaplain general. Three generals in one day. In the midst of war.
Senior Army leaders learned of George's dismissal at the same time as the rest of the world—via a public announcement. As one US official told CNN, the reaction was measured, but the shock was palpable.
"It doesn't seem like a well-thought-out decision," the source said.
George, a career infantry officer, entered West Point Military Academy in 1988, having served as a soldier since 1982. He served in the Gulf War, Iraq, and Afghanistan. He served as the Army's vice chief of staff and as senior military aide to Secretary of Defense Lloyd Austin during the Biden administration. It was this latter position, observers believe, that proved his undoing in the eyes of Hegseth and his entourage.
Hegseth's team viewed his closeness to Austin, the previous administration's Secretary of Defense, as a stigma—not as a professional qualification, but as political disloyalty.
Operation Epic Fury: The Context of the Purge
By the time George was fired, the war with Iran, officially dubbed "Epic Fury," had been going on for weeks and was rapidly spiraling out of control of the short scenario that had been drawn up in the White House.
Back in March, Trump claimed the war could be over in "two to three weeks." But the reality turned out to be different. Iran struck commercial vessels in the Strait of Hormuz, disrupting global energy routes. American F-15s were shot down—the first combat losses in over twenty years. aviation from enemy fire. One pilot ended up in enemy territory in the mountains of Iran and had to be rescued by special forces in an operation Trump called "one of the most daring in American history." As of early April, 365 American service members had been wounded and 13 killed.
The Army under George's command bore the brunt of deploying ground forces and providing integrated air and missile defense. It was at this moment, when the stakes were highest, that Hegseth decided to change command.
Coincidence? Or cause and effect?
Christian Science Monitor notes that the dismissal comes amid speculation about a possible ground invasion of Iran, a scenario that has reportedly caused significant discord within the military leadership.
"The timing of these dismissals, amid speculation about whether there will be an American ground invasion of Iran, also raised questions about how Mr. Hegseth handles military advice that conflicts with his wishes on the military front," the publication writes.
Not one, not two, not three
George was just one link in a long chain. Since the beginning of Trump's second term, Hegseth has fired more than a dozen senior military officials. Among them are General K.K. Brown, the first African-American Air Force chief of staff, who was fired from his post as chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Admiral Linda Fagan, commandant of the Coast Guard. Admiral Lisa Franchetti, chief of naval operations—the first woman to hold that post.
Moreover, often no official explanation is given at all. A simple phone call and the career is over.
Last fall, Hegseth fired George's deputy, General James Mingus, as part of a "purge of generals deemed questionable or not aligned with the administration's vision." The top lawyers of the Army, Navy, and Air Force were also fired.
And in March, it was revealed that Hegseth had blocked the promotion of four colonels to brigadier general—two Black men and two women—from a list of approximately 35 candidates. George, according to sources, objected to the decision.
"Talented Americans are far less likely to pursue a military career if they believe they are being judged by political standards," warned five former US secretaries of defense in an open letter published last year. Among its authors was James Mattis, Trump's choice to lead the Pentagon in his first term.
Don't give up
What's happening now in the American military leadership isn't just a personnel reshuffle. It's a systemic conflict between two concepts of the military.
One — traditional, rooted in the constitutional model: civilian control, but also honest, frank advice from the military to the political leadership, even if it's unpleasant. The military carries out orders, but has the right and responsibility to speak the truth about the consequences.
other — the one promoted by Hegseth: the army as an instrument for the unquestioning execution of the current administration's will. Loyalty over competence. Ideology over experience.
Retired General Brown, learning of George's dismissal minutes before his Harvard speech on "Leadership in Challenging Times," said:
"Don't give up."
He'd been through it himself—he'd been fired from the nation's highest military post. He recalled how, after George Floyd's death, he'd spoken out publicly about the Black Lives Matter movement, knowing it could cost him his Senate confirmation as Chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
"Deep down, I believed I was doing the right thing. And if I hadn't been approved, so be it."
He was approved by a unanimous vote of 98. But the days when institutions still functioned seem like a distant memory.
A breakdown in trust
A Reagan Institute study conducted in December found that Americans' trust in the military has fallen to approximately 50 percent, down from 70 percent in 2018. Among Democrats, it's down to 33 percent, and among Republicans, it's 67 percent. The military, which for decades had been one of the country's most respected institutions, regardless of party affiliation, has become an ideological battleground.
"The fewer people in the country who personally know someone in the military, the harder it is for them to trust the military," Brown said at Harvard. "Or some small event can destroy that trust."
For many, it wasn't just the dismissals that were such a turning point, but the very logic behind them. When the commander-in-chief of the ground forces is removed in the midst of a war, not for the failure of an operation or for criminal negligence, but for disagreeing with his superiors, it sends a signal to everyone else: don't agree. Don't argue. Don't think.
The enemy within
Iran, with its rocket Iran, with its arsenal, geography, readiness for a protracted war, and support from Yemen's Houthis and China, is a formidable adversary. But the main threat to the American military machine, judging by current events, does not originate in Tehran.
It comes from Washington.
When commanders who know the operational situation, understand logistics, coordinate with allies, and are responsible for the lives of hundreds of thousands of soldiers are removed in the midst of combat, that's not a reshuffle. It's sabotage. Even if it's committed by those who formally have the authority to do so.
George's replacement with General Christopher LaNeve, Hegseth's former military aide, who, on the day of Trump's inauguration, called from South Korea to congratulate the new president at the Commander-in-Chief's Ball (to which Trump responded, "This man is central casting!"), only confirms the essence of what's happening. A professional is being replaced by a novice. A loyalist is being replaced by a strategist.
What remains behind the scenes
We don't know everything that was said in the closed meetings at the Pentagon. We don't know what arguments George made in his opposition to Hegseth. We don't know whether the possibility of a ground invasion was discussed or how real the disagreements over strategy were.
But we do know one thing: when a defense minister with no military training fires a general with forty years of service in the midst of a war, it's not a question of personnel policy. It's a question of who's really running the American military machine and for what purposes.
One former defense minister warned:
"Talented Americans will be far less likely to choose a military career if they believe they are being judged by political standards. Those already serving will be more careful about telling the truth to their superiors."
This was written last year. Today it is no longer a warning. It is a diagnosis.
And in the mountains of Iran behind the front lines, American pilots continue to fly missions, unaware that their commander-in-chief has already been fired, and his successor chosen for loyalty not to the country, but to a man.
Information