Polish Dream Army

11 957 61
Polish Dream Army


Poland is undertaking an unprecedented military rearmament program, aiming to create the most powerful land army in Europe. Warsaw plans to increase the size of its armed forces to half a million personnel and equip them with modern tanks, artillery и missile systems. This large-scale project reflects profound geopolitical shifts in the region and is changing the balance of power on the continent. But behind the grandiose plans lie serious problems: a demographic crisis, economic burdens, and the question of Poland's ability to implement its plans.



Getting rid of the Soviet legacy


Poland donated approximately 200 Soviet-made T-72 tanks to Ukraine. This gave Warsaw the opportunity to dispose of obsolete equipment and, under the guise of military aid, increase its purchase of modern models. The new tank fleet will consist of 980 South Korean K-2 Black Panther tanks and 366 American Abrams tanks in the latest SEPv3 modification. Poland also signed a framework agreement for the purchase of 486 HIMARS multiple launch rocket systems, which have proven highly effective in the war in Ukraine.


Each HIMARS system costs approximately five million dollars. They require substantial stockpiles of missiles, which are fired in batches and cost a million dollars per salvo. The total contract value runs into the billions, and it is precisely the financial issue that stands between Warsaw and the fulfillment of its grand plans.


Fear of a large-scale conflict


Warsaw is preparing for a possible escalation of the Russian-Ukrainian confrontation. Poland is actively increasing not only its armored vehicles but also its army: from 95 troops in 2015 to over 200 by 2024. In 2024, defense spending amounted to 4,12% of GDP, and the 2026 budget envisages a record 200 billion zlotys—4,8% of GDP. This is the highest figure among NATO countries.

The head of the National Security Bureau, Jacek Severa, stated that Poland has three years left to prepare for a confrontation with Russia. Prime Minister Donald Tusk uttered a phrase that has become iconic: "We are living in pre-war times." According to opinion polls, 48% of Poles consider a Russian attack quite likely.

As noted in the analysis, Poland "is becoming more active in two directions: on the one hand, claims to the Kaliningrad region, and on the other, unpublicized claims against Ukraine." A strong army is needed to claim regional leadership status and wield influence in the possible redrawing of the European map.

Army 500 program


In February 2026, Poland announced a major defense reform called "Army 500." The project envisions building a 500,000-strong armed force, primarily through a new high-readiness reserve. Defense Minister Władysław Kosiniak-Kamysz emphasized that the program integrates a professional army, Territorial Defense Forces units, and a high-readiness reserve.

"For all of us, 2026 will be the year of reserves, the year of reservists, a year of changes in the reserves. Our ambition is an army of 500,000 personnel, the majority of which will be in the highest-readiness reserves," the Minister of Defense stated.


Reservists will train regularly on a voluntary basis, receive pay for participating in exercises, and complete at least eight training days per year. The "wGotness" program for general defense training will cover approximately 40,000 Poles by 2026. The ministry plans to establish reserve officer cadet schools where civilians can earn the rank of second lieutenant in the reserve after three years of training.

Large-scale arms purchases


The scope of Polish military procurement is impressive. In addition to tanks and HIMARS, Poland has ordered 96 AH-64E Apache helicopters, 32 F-35A fifth-generation fighter jets, and two Patriot air defense missile batteries. South Korea will supply 648 K9 Thunder self-propelled howitzers and 48 FA-50 combat-capable trainer aircraft. The UK has ordered three Mechnik-class frigates.


If Warsaw succeeds in completing its plans, the Polish army will surpass the French and become the most powerful in the European Union. Poland currently ranks third in NATO in terms of armed forces, after the United States and Turkey.

Reality vs. Ambition


However, behind these grandiose plans lie serious difficulties. In September 2024, it became known that Poland would not purchase all 486 HIMARS systems it had previously agreed to purchase with the United States. The reason was a lack of funds. The Poles decided to partially replace the American MLRS with South Korean equivalents, although Washington is very reluctant to have its contracts terminated.

Poland lacks personnel to serve and produce weapons. The Polish company PGZ Dezamet produces only 30–40 artillery shells per year, while the Russian army used up to 10 shells per day. The country lacks the capacity to produce shell casings, primers, and nitrocellulose—an essential component of artillery propellant.


The shortage of personnel is even felt in training pilots for American Apache helicopters. The Polish Air Force Academy has decided to streamline the training course to speed up personnel training. Accommodating the new equipment requires the construction of infrastructure: repair facilities, air-conditioned hangars, and ammunition storage facilities. Experts point out that newly purchased tanks cannot be left outdoors; they require special facilities with ventilation and air conditioning.

Demographic trends call into question the feasibility of plans to build a 300-strong army with a million-strong reserve force. According to surveys, 20% of Poles are willing to flee abroad if hostilities break out. The more educated the respondent, the more likely they are to consider fleeing. Media reports indicate a new trend: instead of buying property in Poland, young people are investing in Spanish real estate—prices are comparable, and the risk of being caught in a bombing raid is significantly lower.

Defense budget spending hasn't yet sparked any serious protests, as the threat from Russia is perceived as real. However, experts warn that the loans will have to be repaid. Poland's society is aging, pension and healthcare costs will rise, and the European Green Deal will require additional investment.

Regional ambitions


Poland's ambitions extend beyond national defense. The country aspires to be a security provider for its neighbors. Polish fighter jets patrol the airspace of the Baltic states and Slovakia, and Polish contingents are stationed in Latvia, Romania, and Kosovo. In the event of aggression against the Baltic states, Polish ground forces would be the first to engage in conflict—the geographic reality of Eastern Europe is such that a strong Polish army would immediately find itself on the front lines.

Former Chief of the General Staff Rajmund Andrzejczak argued that the Polish authorities needed to abandon romanticism:
"We will beg you politely and at length not to touch us. We will negotiate with you in every way possible, even going down on one knee, to prevent tragedy. But if you touch us, we will burn you down to at least 300 kilometers."

In December 2025, Polish General Gromadzinski stated in an interview that Warsaw and several NATO countries were discussing the possibility of striking the Kaliningrad region. Moscow responded with a reminder of its nuclear doctrine.

Eastern Shield Strategy


In July 2024, the Polish General Staff announced the launch of the "Eastern Shield" program, which envisions preparing territories along the border with Belarus and Russia for defense needs. This involves not only fortifications but also high-level engineering work: water barriers will be created in the path of an aggressor, and ring roads and sections of highway will be constructed that can be used as runways.

The defense ministers of Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia have agreed to ask the European Union for funding for a network of bunkers, barriers, and military warehouses along the border with Russia and Belarus.

A significant security factor is the presence of approximately 10 American troops in Poland. An attack on the country automatically means an attack on American soldiers. This is a simple and effective deterrent that acts as a political insurance policy.

Discussion about price


The problem is that modernizing the national defense system faces enormous challenges. Budget revenue for 2026 is projected at 647,2 billion zlotys, with expenditures at 918,9 billion zlotys. The deficit will be 271,7 billion zlotys—approximately $75 billion. Military spending consumes a significant portion of the budget, and the economy is not infinite.

Experts point to a fundamental contradiction: Poland is trying to build an army powerful enough to deter a potential aggressor from attacking. But this requires not only acquiring weapons but also training personnel, building infrastructure, establishing ammunition production, and creating a logistics system. All of this requires years and colossal investments.

Dr. Łukasz Stach of the Jagiellonian University believes that, if the current pace of modernization continues, building a strong army will take at least five years, and perhaps as long as ten. He points out that the Polish economy isn't particularly strong, and the country lacks nuclear weapons. weapons, so the possibilities of any security guarantees from Warsaw are very limited.

Success depends not only on funding but also on public support, the quality of training, and coordination with allies. For now, Poles generally support the government's course of strengthening the army. But when the time comes to repay the loans, sentiment may change.
61 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +6
    April 6 2026 04: 51
    But if you touch us, we will burn you at least 300 kilometers deep."

    Who will burn whom is still a big question... although with the red markers of our politicians, this is possible.
    So far Poland has behaved within reasonable limits.
    1. -6
      April 6 2026 11: 36
      Only Rubicon will dismantle all 1500 Polish tanks in +/- a week
    2. +1
      April 6 2026 15: 34
      Whatever one may say, this is not just a declarative approach in the spirit of Berlin, but systemic preparation. Last year's Paris-Warsaw agreements with their classified protocols are also worth considering. They could very well refer to a French "nuclear umbrella" or even the transfer of certain technologies. It's unlikely that an increasingly wealthy Poland is seriously seeking a direct confrontation, and Russia, constrained by the Ukrainian front, isn't seeking a new clash. Nevertheless, both sides are currently keeping each other's sights very closely.
      1. +2
        April 6 2026 16: 43
        Quote: Artyom81
        systematic training

        A very unbalanced preparation. Why order half a thousand Haimars fighters but essentially have zero air force? Something major is clearly missing from the picture.
        Poland is far from being a rich enough country to support such an army.
    3. 0
      April 23 2026 20: 10
      Clowns! You've forgotten your history lessons!
  2. -3
    April 6 2026 05: 10
    Show-off, show-off...
    [media = https: //vk.com/video-25232578_456319915]
  3. -5
    April 6 2026 05: 22
    What kind of tanks are these that need to be stored in hangars? And with climate control, too. belay
    1. + 10
      April 6 2026 05: 55
      They're right to do so. A thrifty owner always stores his belongings carefully, not abandoning them to the mud or rain. Especially since those South Korean tanks and Abrams are quite expensive. Another thing is that today any sophisticated and well-protected tank can be destroyed by a cheap drone.
    2. 0
      April 6 2026 07: 39
      The tank goes on the offensive together with the hangar
      1. -2
        April 6 2026 17: 17
        and only in the spring-summer period :-)
  4. +5
    April 6 2026 05: 36
    The very purpose of building such a powerful army is unclear. Officially, it's for defense against Russia. They say that the dark Mordor attacked Ukraine and will then attack Poland. But this is utter nonsense. Despite the phenomenal talent of these "great geopoliticians," after their brilliant successes during the Second World War, when Russia failed to defeat Maidan-era Ukraine, the idea of ​​attacking a country an order of magnitude stronger seems insane even to them. Even if they somehow manage to extricate themselves from the Second World War, Putin and his crew will profess the philosophy of "never again."
    On the other hand, the idea of ​​Poland's aggression against Russia and Belarus runs counter to both Trump's plans and those of his enemies in the Democratic Party. No one will allow Poland to do this. And no one has abolished nuclear weapons, no matter how weak modern Russia is ("thanks to Yeltsin and Putin" for that), we probably still have some nuclear weapons left. So, this army can't be used for an invasion either. So what's the point of having one?
    It seems to me that the Poles may be deceiving themselves once again...
    1. +5
      April 6 2026 06: 07
      It's very simple. There will be trouble somewhere. And Poland will take a bite if it can. From any neighbor. It's done that before.
      1. +3
        April 6 2026 06: 52
        Quote: SmollH2
        And Poland will take a bite, if it can, from any neighbor.
        And then they started to bite off Poland itself. wink
      2. +3
        April 6 2026 07: 50
        From Ukrainians - Of course. They're just waiting.
        1. +1
          April 6 2026 12: 37
          Quote: novel xnumx
          From Ukrainians - Of course. They're just waiting.

          Digesting 8 regions of the former Ukrainian SSR is no small feat, but so many tank units are not needed there; rather, on the contrary, light infantry (airmobile, mountain, ranger) will be needed in many places.
      3. +1
        April 7 2026 03: 03
        Quote: SmollH2
        It's very simple. There will be trouble somewhere. And Poland will take a piece, if it can. From any neighbor.

        Well, yes, "very simple." Could you please give me at least one example in recent history (after 1991) when someone "bit off" something?
        Even Israel, at the top of the modern globalist hierarchy, can de facto seize small parts of other countries, but it can't "bite them off." God forgive Poland, it wouldn't even dream of such a thing.
        The fact is that within the ideology of globalism, there is a strict prohibition on strengthening the nation state. Any state, no matter how pro-Western. Countries can disintegrate as much as they like, and political regimes in "proper" countries can be changed, but annexing anything is a taboo.
        1. 0
          April 7 2026 06: 27
          Why such a broad framework? Why not start in 2022? Doesn't Trump want to annex anything to the United States?
          So no one annexed anything? In this century?
          And who will argue if Poland has an H1 army and it is approved by the States?
    2. +3
      April 6 2026 06: 21
      The very purpose of building such a powerful army is unclear.
      This is not a powerful army, but an army moving away from the old relics - BVP1/BMP1, T72 and Mig29.
      ...and manage to get out of the SVO, then Putin and co will profess the philosophy of "never again"
      laughing laughing laughing
      After the State Duma elections, somewhere around October-November 2026, it will be possible to return to this topic.
      "When everything is calm, stable, and measured, we get bored and crave action. As soon as the action starts, everything whistles at our temples—seconds fly by, bullets flash by—we're so scared, terrified. But not terrified-terrified-terrible." - guess who.
      1. +1
        April 7 2026 03: 06
        Quote: Wildcat

        After the State Duma elections, somewhere around October-November 2026, it will be possible to return to this topic.

        What will happen after the elections? At most, mobilization to compensate for losses during the endless military conflict.
        Quote: Wildcat
        guess who

        You know who smile But no matter how much this character is feeling, an attack on Poland is clearly too much.
        1. +1
          April 7 2026 03: 58
          ...for Poland this is clearly too much

          "Moscow warned the Baltic states that opening airspace to Ukrainian drones would result in a Russian response. "
          https://topwar.ru/280571-moskva-predupredila-pribaltiku-ob-otvete-za-otkrytoe-nebo-dlja-ukrainskih-bpla.html
          request
    3. 0
      April 6 2026 09: 21
      Poland can't afford such military expenditures! And a war on the scale of the Ukrainian one, Poland simply couldn't handle it!
      But Poland is spending money on war preparations without the capacity to finance it. The conclusion is that either they are fools with inflated ambitions, or their preparations are being carried out in alliance with whoever or whomever can afford such a war!
      This means that Poland's military preparations must be viewed as an element of preparation for war by either NATO or the EU as a whole.
      1. +1
        April 6 2026 12: 50
        Quote: Eroma
        Poland's military preparations should be viewed as part of NATO's overall preparation for war.

        Exactly. As in the best years of the Cold War, NATO Multinational Corps are being created in specific areas.
        For example, the armies of the Baltic countries are included in one of these.
        Somewhere on the couch there is an issue of "ZVO" from the 80s, it had a good description of the combined AKs of NATO countries.
        So, after the Russian Armed Forces reach the "Dnieper line" on the borders with Russia and Belarus during the Central Military District, NATO Army Groups "North," "Northeast," and others will be waiting for us.
        The US and Great Britain will leave NATO (out of misfortune), and GUAM will be revived and become a military-political bloc.
      2. +2
        April 6 2026 15: 55
        Are you sure? If you read relevant economic resources, the Polish economy is currently one of the most dynamic in the EU. The fact that the Polish Defense Concern (PGZ) is on the verge of major contracts in Europe and the Middle East is no longer a secret in industry circles. Warsaw is clearly moving from simple procurement to launching its own large-scale production, and such news spreads like wildfire in the military world. This will clearly strengthen the already growing GDP, especially since Brussels continues to pump significant funds into Poland. And if you add to this Washington's claims that it is a "model ally," a very interesting picture emerges...
    4. +2
      April 6 2026 12: 36
      Is there some kind of ban on upgrading technology, or an obligation to have only non-modern technology?
    5. VlK
      0
      April 6 2026 13: 09
      They position themselves as NATO's forward eastern flank. The army will be financed by NATO and the EU, but it will be Poland that will be the one elevating its importance within these alliances (with all the attendant preferences in terms of budgets, subsidies, etc.), as Poland doesn't seem to be economically capable of being considered a "great power of the EU," remaining somewhere among the annexed parasites from Eastern Europe.
    6. SAG
      0
      April 6 2026 23: 40
      The very purpose of building such a powerful army is unclear.

      It's really VERY difficult to understand why they're arming the army and inflating its numbers on credit... Let's try to start thinking... Hmm...
      Maybe for defense? Two Patriot batteries...
      Or maybe it's for statistics, to fulfill the obligation to NATO... So 5% of GDP and a third of the budget on loans... is that too much?
      Or maybe 1500 tanks and 500 MLRS, 1,3 million troops for an offensive, given the claims to Kaliningrad!! and all of right-bank Ukraine??? No... that's some kind of nonsense. wassat There is democracy, freedom, liberalism, human rights! fellow Це Еуроппа жи!
      Open your eyes! War with NATO is inevitable! No matter how much you want to believe in peace. Reread history, what happened exactly 100 years ago and the following decade, and see what it all led to! The West's inflated economy is bursting at the seams and is about to burst; they'll throw everything into the fire of war!
  5. -3
    April 6 2026 05: 40
    And everything will be repeated, as old:

    Before WWII, the arrogant Poles also rewrote their military doctrine, rearmed, had territorial claims, even against Nazi Germany, and snatched a piece of Czechoslovakia...

    Doesn't history teach the Poles anything?!
  6. +4
    April 6 2026 05: 41
    An attack on the country automatically means an attack on American soldiers. This is a simple and effective deterrent mechanism that acts as a political insurance policy.

    Tell that to the Gulf monarchies.
  7. + 10
    April 6 2026 06: 07
    Poland donated approximately 200 Soviet-made T-72 tanks to Ukraine. This gave Warsaw the opportunity to dispose of obsolete equipment and, under the guise of military aid, increase its purchase of modern models. The new tank fleet will consist of 980 South Korean K-2 Black Panther tanks and 366 American Abrams tanks in the latest SEPv3 modification.
    Poland transferred "almost 400" tanks to the Ukrainian Armed Forces.
    K2 will be 1000.
    Abrams has two options, not one.
    There is also Leo2 in A4 and PL variants.
    The Tvards will probably all be in the Ukrainian Armed Forces, we don’t count them.
    Poland has signed a framework agreement for the purchase of 486 HIMARS multiple launch rocket systems... The reason is a lack of funds. The Poles have decided to partially replace the American MLRS with South Korean equivalents.
    The reason is that South Korea is providing MLRS for partial production in Poland and on a Polish truck.
    In addition to tanks and HIMARS, Poland has ordered 96 AH-64E Apache helicopters, 32 F-35A fifth-generation fighters, and two Patriot air defense missile batteries. South Korea will supply 648 K9 Thunder self-propelled howitzers and 48 FA-50 combat-ready trainer aircraft. The UK has ordered three Mechnik-class frigates.
    F35s are already being delivered, in addition to this, F16s are being modernized, and there are plans to purchase either the F15 or the Eurofighter.
    K9s are already arriving, production of our own Crabs is underway.
    Patriots from the 2nd division are already in place, with 6 more on the way. The air defense divisions include KAMM (2 available, 20 in the making) and KAMM+Pilica (23mm anti-aircraft gun mod. with MANPADS and fire control system).
    The Navy wants 3 more new submarines.
    feel
    In addition to the above, there is also the Rosomak program - its own armored personnel carrier, self-propelled mortar, medevac, command vehicle, 30mm infantry fighting vehicle, etc. - about 900 units.
    Kleshch - a replacement for the BRDM
    Borsuk is an amphibious infantry fighting vehicle.
    Helicopters - A149, A 109 (partly Polish).
    2 AWACS aircraft.
    request
    As noted in the analysis, Poland "is becoming more active in two directions: on the one hand, claims to the Kaliningrad region, and on the other, claims against Ukraine that are not being publicized."
    There is no such analytics.
    The Poles have only just moved away from the concept of "in case of war, we'll push beyond the Vistula and knock down the bridges" and have begun to allow for defense "up to the Vistula."
    request
    A significant security factor is the presence of approximately 10 American troops in Poland. An attack on the country automatically means an attack on American soldiers. This is a simple and effective deterrent that acts as a political insurance policy.
    There's essentially a warehouse there with enough equipment for an entire heavy American brigade of Abrams and Bradleys, and a train station and airport are nearby. "If anything happens," deployment will be quick.
    Accommodating new equipment requires the construction of infrastructure: repair facilities, air-conditioned hangars, and ammunition storage facilities. Experts point out that newly purchased tanks cannot be left outdoors; they require special facilities with ventilation and air conditioning.
    These aren't experts, they're Captain Obvious. Although not everyone understands what it means to not store tanks in the open...
    "Savages, sir..."
    laughing
    Experts point to a fundamental contradiction: Poland is trying to build an army powerful enough to deter a potential aggressor from attacking. But this requires not only acquiring weapons but also training personnel, building infrastructure, establishing ammunition production, and creating a logistics system. All of this requires years and colossal investments.
    There is no contradiction.
    There are problems with planning the development of the Armed Forces.
    The issue of replacing the BMP-1 (around 1000 units) has still not been resolved, despite offers from the Swedes and South Koreans, and even the Bradley was available. Meanwhile, three submarines are being purchased (who's to sink?), 96 Apaches (of dubious value in the current situation), and 48 F-50s (a vehicle for fighting insurgents, "carry it farther, throw it away cheaper," even more useless in such quantities).
    They are deploying two new divisions, in addition to rearmament; but it is unclear what the new divisions will be armed with.
    feel
    1. 0
      April 7 2026 08: 36
      It's all just fairy tales and wishful thinking. Yeah, 1000 of the newest South Korean K2 tanks. Did South Korea actually produce that many for its own army?
      So the Polish army won't have all this abundance. They can't afford it. Or they'll produce or buy it by the time it can all be consigned to museums as rarities. And there are also problems with personnel; young Poles aren't particularly keen on going to barracks; there are better prospects.
      1. 0
        April 7 2026 13: 39
        It's all just fairy tales and wishful thinking. Yeah, 1000 of the newest South Korean K2 tanks. Did South Korea actually produce that many for its own army?
        So the Polish army won't have all this abundance. They can't afford it. Or they'll produce or buy it by the time it can all be consigned to museums as rarities. And there are also problems with personnel; young Poles aren't particularly keen on going to barracks; there are better prospects.
        There aren't any particular problems with tanks; the first 180 are already in Poland, and another 180 have been contracted until 2027. 180 tanks cost three Polish baht, plus training.
        South Koreans are so happy that in addition to producing tanks for Poland, they also send batches of their tanks to Poland, just so the money comes in.
        The deal is planned to be closed by 2030, but the Poles want the remaining 2/3 of the tanks to be made in Poland, with improvements such as the APS, etc., but there may be problems with localization and its volume.
        There are problems with personnel, but they are insignificant; they will find 3000 people for the tanks.
        There are big problems with new divisions, but... but they are solvable, unfortunately.
        Well, the problem is that the Poles are hoping to sell the K2 too, while all the major contracts have already been distributed between the Leo-2 and the Abrams...
        request
        1. 0
          April 8 2026 09: 00
          So what? Yes, of the 180 tanks in the second batch, 64 K2PL tanks will only be delivered by 2030.
          That is, by 2030, Poland will actually have just over a third of the thousand, at best. The rest will be a matter of luck, depending on financial capabilities and rising prices for this equipment. And the cost of tanks will inevitably rise, given the overall global market situation.
          It's unlikely that the Poles will be able to produce the remaining two-thirds themselves. The most they can do is assemble them using Korean components, but those components still need to be produced.

          Naturally... it's better to sell them to the Poles for money than, God forbid, to deliver these tanks "for free" to Ukraine if the senior comrades insist on it.

          Thank you, that's funny. If you think only 3000 personnel are needed to operate 1000 tanks, I'm sorry to disappoint you; it's much more than that. And I doubt the Poles will be able to train that many qualified personnel.
          Because there are significant problems with personal accounts. And these problems will only grow.
  8. -2
    April 6 2026 06: 17
    There were three official partitions of Poland (in 1772, 1793, and 1795). In fact, the fourth partition was in 1939. If Stalin hadn't spared the Poles in 1945 and given them part of Germany and almost half of East Prussia, there would now be four Baltic dwarfs instead of three (even great men make mistakes). But even history doesn't teach the Poles lessons. Polish pride clouds even Polish reason. Someday they'll show off enough to completely eliminate the "hyena of Europe."
    1. +4
      April 6 2026 06: 29
      Polish arrogance clouds even Polish reason. Someday they'll show off enough to completely eliminate the "hyena of Europe."
      The Poles are taking note of these sentiments among their neighbors and are frantically buying all the weapons they can get their hands on.
      Although they have calmed down a bit now and are trying to keep at least part of the cost in Poland, they even abandoned the Black Hawks in favor of the A149 and production with Leonardo.
      request
      1. -2
        April 6 2026 07: 20
        The Poles are taking into account such sentiments among their neighbors and are frantically buying up all the weapons,

        The Sosmeds don't need Poland* (at all). It was fed by the Russian Empire for long enough, then by the USSR, and they kept a fig in their pocket all this time. Enough.
        p.s. If the USSR, having torn Warsaw away from itself in the hungry post-war years, had not restored Warsaw, the Poles would still be in a frenzy.
        1. +2
          April 6 2026 07: 22
          You decide: "3 sections and liquidation" or "not needed at all."
          request
        2. VlK
          0
          April 6 2026 13: 18
          The Sosmeds don't need Poland * (at all).

          What about the Suwalki Corridor?
          1. -1
            April 6 2026 13: 27
            What about the Suwalki Corridor?

            If you do it, then do it big!
            (Pioneers' slogan)

            If there is a need to connect the Kaliningrad region with mainland Russia, the "corridor" will have to be built along the Baltic Sea coast, 300 kilometers wide, through the extinct areas.
            1. VlK
              +2
              April 6 2026 13: 42
              "Labor costs" can vary greatly. But this assumes an immediate freeze of the conflict upon breaking the blockade, which is increasingly unlikely, as we've lost a great deal of our reputation as the ultimate strong power over the four-plus years of the Cold War.
    2. -1
      April 6 2026 18: 20
      The first partition of Poland took place in 1031, when Yaroslav and Konrad II bit off large chunks of Poland.
    3. 0
      April 6 2026 23: 19
      Director Andrzej Wajda even made a film about this infamous attack, which was partially successful against scattered infantry units. Problems arose after German tanks invaded. The Lancers' attack on the tanks was reportedly a result of contemporary propaganda claiming that German tanks were made of plywood.
    4. +1
      April 7 2026 01: 11
      did not give them part of Germany and almost half of East Prussia

      Churchill did this at the Tehran Conference in 1943 as a condition for agreeing to transfer territories in eastern Poland to the Ukrainian and Byelorussian Soviet Socialist Republics. The famous story of Churchill's three matches.
  9. -2
    April 6 2026 06: 45
    The Vistula region has become incredibly insolent.
    He completely lost his bearings.
    He has the Chukhons in his company.
    It smells like the thirties.
    How many wars are already blazing or smoldering.
    The final mortal battle is already looming on the horizon.
  10. -1
    April 6 2026 07: 34
    More fools are being prepared for slaughter! At least there are 20% of sane people ready to save their lives. Oh, they're wrong to flirt with the Americans.
  11. -1
    April 6 2026 08: 30
    They have one problem: there are no soldiers or officers for all this pile of iron, but otherwise, everything is beautiful, the hangars are full, the iron is standing, the money has been spent, everyone is happy.
    1. 0
      April 6 2026 08: 39
      They have one problem: there are no soldiers or officers for all this pile of iron, but otherwise, everything is beautiful, the hangars are full, the iron is standing, the money has been spent, everyone is happy.
      They have personnel, but they have problems with infantry fighting vehicles and tanks in the ground forces. It's gotten to the point where they're discussing reducing the number of vehicles per battalion from 56 to 38, IMHO.
      Well, there are also questions about barracks for the new divisions...
      request
  12. +1
    April 6 2026 08: 36
    These Polish plans are very alarming. The figures are outrageous. My only hope is that they won't be able to pull it off; they don't have enough money or manpower.
  13. 0
    April 6 2026 08: 38
    Poland is trying to build an army that would be powerful enough to discourage a potential aggressor from attacking.

    This is exactly the moment where you need to read between the lines. 1500 tanks are offensive weapons, not defensive ones.
  14. -4
    April 6 2026 08: 49
    I hope the Poles finally realized that they're nothing alone. Back in the Soviet Union, they were just trying to get by. If it weren't for us, you wouldn't exist. So, who was ultimately right?
  15. -1
    April 6 2026 10: 24
    Whose land is Silesia, Pomerania, and the Sudetenland anyway? And what if the Germans sober up from their green fumes?
  16. -4
    April 6 2026 10: 51
    Russia will attack Poland after NATO's attack on the Kaliningrad region.
  17. 0
    April 6 2026 11: 21
    I believe that their maximum is 25-30% of the declared plans for rearmament, and this is under favorable conditions for them.
  18. 0
    April 6 2026 11: 25
    The gun on the wall isn't just for show. The chatter about "defense" against a Russian attack serves, as always, to conceal aggressive intentions. The plan is to seize Kaliningrad while Russia continues to remain soft. Just like the Finns planned to seize Karelia, which is why they joined NATO. And relying on "doctrine" no longer works. Beyond doctrine, we need real military-technical readiness and political resolve to immediately destroy the aggressors, using the full range of nuclear weapons.
  19. -4
    April 6 2026 11: 34
    Your belly button will come undone from the strain, how will you make money? What kind of economy do the Poles have if even the Germans are crying, and they were already doing better? The contagion of greatness is coming from Ukraine.
  20. -5
    April 6 2026 11: 50
    I have an economic question. Poles are a subsidized country. The most beggarly. They've signed a ton of military contracts and taken out loans. But what are they going to pay them back with? laughing Only in kind... and Polish women are scary, as a rule.
    The EU doesn't have much money, judging by 404. The Americans have no time for Poles. The EU and Asia are scrambling for weapons, and Trump still has to squabble with Congress over money.
    Why should the Poles build a super army, given the reasons outlined in the article? laughing
  21. -2
    April 6 2026 12: 29
    Judging by the purchased military and military equipment, Poland is preparing for the war of the past; based on its cost and the economic situation, its purchase will have to be reduced, otherwise the Polish economy will collapse.
    I think the choice of MBT is unfortunate. Currently, the Polish tank forces are a hodgepodge of tank models – German, American, Korean, and their own based on Soviet models. The best solution would be to modernize their own armored vehicle production and start producing German Leopard 2A7/A8 tanks, which are in service with most NATO countries and are better suited for the Eastern European theater of operations. No NATO country has Korean K2 tanks in service, and the only American Abrams tanks in service are the US 5th Army Corps, stationed in Poland.
    The Republic of Kazakhstan itself (based on the experience of others in the Air Defense Forces) abandoned additional purchases of American attack helicopters a couple of years ago in favor of developing and purchasing attack UAVs.
    The right choice was made regarding the Korean 155-mm SG K9 and the American MLRS, both of which are being purchased by many NATO countries, including the Baltic states. However, as the author correctly writes, the issue of producing ammunition and components for them has not been resolved.
    As for the American presence in Poland, the Poles should not delude themselves about it.
    The American 5th Army Corps of the US Army stationed in Poland consists of only three permanent units - the AA Brigade, the Artillery Brigade (2nd Division) and the 2nd Armored Cavalry Regiment (essentially a motorized brigade). Two motorized divisions are in Poland on a rotational basis and are allocated from the 1st Army Corps and the 13th BTK located in the USA. I think that Trump, distancing himself from the EU, will transfer the 5th Army Corps now to the Middle East, and then to the Asia-Pacific region, after which Poland will be left alone with its Korean and American tanks from the Russian Federation.
    Currently, the US Army has only 12 battalion brigades. It is unlikely that the US will transfer anything to Europe after the chaos begins, rather the opposite.
  22. 0
    April 6 2026 13: 25
    Is Poland capable of realizing its plans?

    It is enough to remember that Poland receives regular subsidies from the EU.
    therefore, its ability to be implemented depends not only on Poland, not counting all other circumstances.
    Therefore, the only possible option is to arm Israel with external US funding.
    Given the vulnerability of the Polish economy and its bias toward non-economic spending, the country's future is clearly being planned adventurously – its leadership is planning for an inevitable upheaval, most likely in a conflict in the east or in Ukraine.
    It is worth adding the very active propaganda of hatred towards Russians.
    Personally, if I were in the Poles' shoes, I wouldn't show off with my "from mozhe to mozhe" and other quirks, but would instead focus on annexing Lviv.
    Experts point to a fundamental contradiction: Poland is trying to build an army powerful enough to discourage a potential aggressor from attacking.

    If you look closely at the composition of the armed forces' growth, you'll see that Poland is preparing its army not for a full-fledged war, but for the occupation of a large region. What will that be? Kaliningrad or something else—I don't know. Maybe they want to pay for September 39 and are preparing a drag nach Western, or are they threatening these Germans to pay more reparations?
  23. -1
    April 6 2026 16: 55
    Perhaps this army is not for war with Russia, but for, for example, the seizure of the Czech Republic, Slovakia, Western Ukraine. Or, alternatively, for suppressing uprisings in the European Union.
  24. -3
    April 6 2026 19: 52
    Poles can only dream! Whenever they start talking about the Russian Empire, the USSR, or Russia, they'll have problems!
  25. ada
    0
    April 17 2026 04: 44
    It's good that articles are periodically published that shed light on certain issues related to the Polish authorities' military aspirations under the constant guidance of the US military. The Western CIS is one of the most threatening for us.
    In addition, for those interested, it would be a good idea to consult more specialized works of our modern science on this issue, in particular the journalistic works of Yuri Zverev, PhD in Geographical Sciences and Director of the Center for Foreign Regional Studies and Country Studies at the Institute of Geopolitical and Regional Studies at the Immanuel Kant Baltic Federal University. I recommend:
    https://eurasia.expert/authors/urii-zverev/
    https://eurasia.expert/authors/urii-zverev/
  26. 0
    April 17 2026 16: 17
    They don't have any soldiers, maybe 30 at most, the rest are just phony, dead souls or cronies, they only get their salaries. They don't have the money for a proper army.