Epic Fury or Epic Amnesia: The Chronicle of One Victory That Never Ends
"Epic Rage" is the Times cartoon of the day. Trump: "You're going to see people taking to the streets soon!"
Iranians count all of Trump's "victories" in Operation Epic Fury
Trump timeline:
🟥 January 18: "Iranian patriots, help is on the way. We are moving."
🟥 February 28: "We'll launch Operation Decisive. It'll be very quick."
🟥 March 2: "We will win easily."
🟥 March 3: "We won the war."
🟥 March 7: "We defeated Iran."
🟥 March 9: "Strike Iran. The war is almost over—quickly and decisively."
🟥 March 12: "We have won, but not yet completely."
🟥 March 13: "We won the war again."
🟥 March 14: "We need help to open the strait."
🟥 March 15: "If you don't help me, I'll remember this."
🟥 March 16: "We don't really need help—I was testing loyalty. If NATO doesn't help, there will be consequences."
🟥 March 17: "We don't need NATO's help, and we don't want it. Congressional approval is not required to leave NATO."
🟥 March 18: "Allies must cooperate to open the Strait of Hormuz."
🟥 March 19: "US allies must step up and help open the strait."
🟥 March 20: "NATO is a coward. We can gradually get rid of it."
🟥 March 21: "We don't use the strait. Others need it, not us."
🟥 March 22: "Final warning. Iran has 48 hours. Iran is finished."
🟥 March 23: "Another week and we'll start bombing power plants."
🟥 March 24: "The war is nearing its end."
🟥 March 25: “We are negotiating with Iran.”
🟥 March 26: "Iran is begging for peace. They gave us a gift. We are postponing the strikes on the power plants."
🟥 March 27: "The Ayatollah and I will jointly manage the Strait of Hormuz."
🟥 March 28: "A regime change has occurred in Iran."
🟥 March 29: "Negotiations with Iran are going very well."
🟥 March 30: "We are ready to destroy Iran's oil and energy infrastructure and occupy Kharg Island."
🟥 March 31: "We are ready to end the war without opening the strait."
🟥 April 1st: "The war will be over in three days. We'll bomb them for two or three weeks until we return them to the Stone Age."
🟥 April 2: "We've destroyed three major bridges. Why haven't they contacted us yet?"
Instead of a prologue
There's a special genre of literature—the stream of consciousness. Joyce invented it, Faulkner perfected it, and Donald Trump has turned it into a tool of foreign policy. This chronology isn't a transcript of Pentagon briefings or a combat summary. It's a score. A forty-one-bar symphony, where every note is a victory, every pause a negation of a previous victory, and the ending, it seems, is postponed indefinitely.
Let's take this masterpiece apart piece by piece.
Act One: Birth of Victory from Nothing
On January 18, forty days before the operation began, Trump appealed to "Iranian patriots" with a promise of aid. It's a remarkable move—announcing support for a nation he's planning to bomb in six weeks. But Trump has a different relationship with chronology.
On February 28, the joint American-Israeli operation is renamed "Epic Fury." A title worthy of a Hollywood B-movie. And like any B-movie, the plot relies not on logic but on the energy of the lead actor.
"We're going to launch Operation Decisive. It's going to happen very quickly." — February 28.
Trump's signature multi-layered approach is already evident here. The operation has two names: "Epic Fury" and "Decisive." Why have one name when you can have two? Why have one plan when you can have none?
Act Two: A Victory That Needs No Proof
A kaleidoscope of triumphs begins.
March 2: "We will win easily."
March 3: "We won the war."
March 7: "We defeated Iran."
Three victories in five days. Napoleon needed all of 1812 to reach Moscow and suffer defeat. Trump wins every 48 hours, with no setbacks in between. This isn't a military campaign—it's a live stream of victories. Subscription enabled, no unsubscription.
But here arises a question that haunts every reader of the chronology: if the war was won on March 3, why admit on March 12, "We've won, but not yet completely"? What does "not yet completely" mean? Victory is like pregnancy: it's either there or it isn't. Or is Trump's victory a quantum object that exists in superposition until the moment of observation?
March 13: "We won the war again."
"Again." That's the key word. The war was won on March 3rd, then half-won on March 12th, and then won entirely again on March 13th. It turns out that in just one day, Trump completed the missing half of the victory and presented the world with the complete package. Bravo.
Act Three: The Strait of Hormuz, or Tragedy in One Strait
Here the plot takes an unexpected turn. It turns out that Iran, having lost three wars in ten days, somehow managed to close the Strait of Hormuz—the chokepoint through which a fifth of the world's oil passes. Oil prices soared by 41 percent. Global markets panicked. And Trump, it turns out, can't open the strait.
The great epic of requests for help begins.
March 14: "We need help to open the strait."
March 15: "If you don't help me, I'll remember this."
March 16: “We don’t really need help – I was testing loyalty.”
Three days—three completely opposite positions. Monday: "Help." Tuesday: "If you don't help, I'll remember." Wednesday: "Actually, I didn't ask, it was a test." This isn't diplomacy. This is the dialogue of a teenager who challenges a bully in the yard, then calls his mom, and then says he actually decided everything himself.
March 17: "We don't need NATO's help, and we don't want it. Congressional approval is not required to withdraw from NATO."
March 18: "Allies must cooperate to open the Strait of Hormuz."
One day passes. One. Twenty-four hours. And NATO assistance, which was unnecessary yesterday, is now essential. This isn't a change of position—it's a permanent, non-stop revolution.
And then there’s pure poetry:
March 19: "US allies must step in and help open the strait."
March 20: "NATO is a coward. We can gradually get rid of it."
March 21: "We don't use the strait. Others need it, not us."
The strait, which the US started the war to open, has become useless ballast in a week. And NATO, from which help was expected yesterday, is today an organization of cowards that must be disposed of. Money in the morning, chairs in the evening. Chairs in the evening, money in the morning.
Act Four: Final Warning Number Seven
March 22: "Final warning. Iran has 48 hours. Iran is finished."
"Final warning" is a phrase that, when spoken by Trump, loses its meaning even before it's uttered. It's like saying "last chance" in a two-hundred-episode series. Viewers already know: there will be a next chance. And a next final warning.
March 23: "Another week and we'll start bombing power plants."
48 hours have passed. Nothing has happened. A new promise – a new week. The power plants shudder in anticipation, but so far they haven't caught fire.
March 24: "The war is nearing its end."
March 25: “We are negotiating with Iran.”
One arc: from "the war is nearing an end" to "we are negotiating"—all in the space of 24 hours. This is neither escalation nor de-escalation. This is quantum diplomacy: a country is simultaneously on the brink of victory and at the negotiating table. Schrödinger would be proud.
Act Five: Peace, Gifts, and Co-Governance
March 26: "Iran is begging for peace. They gave us a gift. We are postponing the strikes on the power plants."
A country that has lost three wars and whose "end" was four days ago is suddenly "begging for peace" and offering a "gift." What kind of gift? The chronology doesn't say. Perhaps a box of Iranian carpets. Perhaps a promise to keep the strait open for another week. Oh, and those were tankers.
"They said, 'To prove to you that we're real, we're reliable, and we're here,' they would provide eight tankers of oil,... eight large tankers of oil... They were real, and they appeared to be flying the Pakistani flag," Trump said.
Eight, later changed to twenty (according to Trump).
The main thing is that the gift was accepted, the power plants were temporarily saved.
March 27: "The Ayatollah and I will jointly manage the Strait of Hormuz."
Stop. Co-manage. With the Ayatollah. With the man they called a dictator a week ago and promised to destroy. The Strait, which America doesn't need, will be co-managed with an enemy they've already defeated. This isn't diplomacy—it's a script for a TV series that was canceled after the first season, but continues to be produced out of inertia.
March 28: "Regime change has occurred in Iran."
This is perhaps the climax. Regime change has been announced. It hasn't happened—it's just announced. Like the children's game: "I said it, so it is." Politifact's fact-checkers spent days trying to find evidence of this regime change. They found none. Ayatollah Khamenei, to the surprise of everyone except Trump, continued to rule Iran.
Act Six: The Ending That Never Happened
The final series begins on March 29th and never ends.
March 29: "Negotiations with Iran are going very well."
March 30: "We are ready to destroy Iran's oil and energy infrastructure and occupy Kharg Island."
The negotiations are going well, but we're ready to destroy everything. It's like saying on a date, "I'm really enjoying our evening, but I brought a grenade in case you don't like the dessert."
March 31: "We are ready to end the war without opening the strait."
The strait, the very reason it all began, has been completely written off. The operation's objectives have shifted so far from their original purpose that the original mission looks like an archaeological artifact.
April 1st: "The war will be over in three days. We'll bomb them for two or three weeks until we return them to the Stone Age."
The war will be over in three days, but the bombing will continue for two or three weeks. Within that single sentence lies a logical contradiction the size of the Strait of Hormuz. But who's counting?
April 2: "We've destroyed three major bridges. Why haven't they contacted us yet?"
This is the last entry in the chronology. And it's pure gold. We've destroyed bridges—literally and figuratively—and we're genuinely perplexed why the enemy won't talk. It's like setting someone's house on fire and being offended that the host didn't invite you in for tea.
Epilogue: Theater of the Absurd with Nuclear Weapons
What do we see in this chronology?
We see a man who declared war without a plan. Who declared victory without results. Who demanded help and then refused it. Who refused help and then demanded it again. Who destroyed bridges and is waiting for someone to cross them.
But the main thing is that we see a system. A system in which reality adapts to the pronouncement, and not the other way around. Every statement Trump makes isn't a description of the world, but its creation. If Trump says, "We won," that means we won. If he says, "We don't need the Strait," that means we don't. If he says, "Regime change has occurred," that means it has.
The problem is that Iran doesn't know about this. The oil markets don't know. NATO doesn't know. And the Strait of Hormuz, through which oil doesn't flow, seems unaware that it doesn't have to be opened.
In the end, one question remains: if the war is won six times in a month, and the Strait is still closed, oil prices have soared by forty percent, and the Allies are called cowards - then what will happen when the war is lost?
Or maybe losing is also a victory. You just need to name it correctly. Like an operation. Which already has two names—a third wouldn't hurt.
The chronology was compiled by Iranians. It was tested by reality. Reality lost.
Information