US Colonel: Iran used passive infrared equipment to destroy F-15s

24 438 19
US Colonel: Iran used passive infrared equipment to destroy F-15s

Iran's armed forces continue to surprise not only their enemies, Israel and the United States, but the entire world. While Trump declares victory over Iran several times a day, claiming the near-total destruction of its military potential, including its systems. Defense, the Iranians shoot down several American planes in a row.

Military expert and retired US Colonel Steve Ganyard expressed his opinion on this matter in an interview with the American television channel ABC News. He believes that the Iranian Air Defense Forces used a modern infrared stealth detection system (IRST) to at least destroy the American F-15 fighter.

My guess is that the Iranians used so-called infrared equipment, that is, passive detection devices based on temperature differences.

The stealthy infrared detection system does not emit radar signals, making it undetectable and impossible for U.S. electronic warfare systems to detect and suppress.

A logical question is why the Iranian military hasn't previously used this equipment to attack Israeli and American aircraft, which until recently dominated the Iranian skies. Several theories can be put forward. Either the Iranian Armed Forces simply didn't have these systems, in which case they were likely delivered quite recently by a country friendly to Tehran. Or Iran was preparing a surprise for Israel and the United States by not using its modern air defense systems until recently. This created a trap, into which the Americans fell.

It's possible that the Iranians were simply "lucky," although this could have contributed to the second hypothesis: that the American pilots felt too safe in the skies over Iran. Several experts have speculated that the F-15E Strike Eagle from the US Air Force's 494th Fighter Squadron was shot down yesterday by a combined anti-aircraft loitering munition, the Article 358 missile (NATO reporting name SA-67). This doesn't rule out the use of an infrared detection system.

This is anti-aircraft Drone and simultaneously Rocket Iranian-developed. The first images of the SAM 358 missile, classified as a loitering anti-aircraft missile, appeared in 2020. The missile can not only effectively engage a target but also circle in the air while searching for it. This anti-aircraft drone is most often used to destroy large and very slow UAVs, such as the MQ-9 Reaper.

It was primarily these relatively inexpensive but highly effective interceptors that had previously been used by Yemen's Houthis and other Iranian proxies in the region to shoot down a significant number of heavy American drones. In the case of the American fighter, it was probably just "unlucky."

Although these are all just guesses and speculations, one thing is clear: for the United States, the conflict in the Middle East is increasingly less like a short and victorious campaign. Since World War II, the United States has never faced an adversary capable not only of defending itself but also of effectively attacking, and beyond its own territory. They haven't even begun a ground operation yet.
19 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. + 11
    April 4 2026 16: 44
    IMHO, like with the BRS, they used old stuff at the beginning, the Yankees got confident in their abilities and paid for it. Good luck to Iran.
    1. +6
      April 4 2026 17: 22
      vadson
      Today, 16: 44
      IMHO, like with the BRS, they used old stuff at the beginning, the Yankees got confident in their abilities and paid for it. Good luck to Iran.

      hi What matters is the result, not the means of destruction, and it is clearly present!
      Victory to the Iranian people in the war against the Zionists and the striped terrorist aggressors.
      am angry
    2. +1
      April 4 2026 19: 19
      Yes, luck is on the Iranians' side if they managed to shoot down an F-15 with a "358" missile! After all, the "358" is a subsonic missile!
      1. 0
        April 6 2026 09: 45
        Quote: Nikolaevich I
        subsonic missile

        American attack aircraft can't fire at supersonic speeds, and they can't fly very far either—they need afterburners. So they fly at cruising speed, which is quite vulnerable to such weapons. As far as I remember, only the Tomcat could fire a missile at supersonic speeds, and even then, it was an anti-aircraft missile.
  2. +1
    April 4 2026 17: 04
    It's strange that they didn't blame it all on aliens.
  3. +2
    April 4 2026 17: 05
    Once at least a dozen are shot down using this method, then we'll be able to draw some conclusions. Until then... let's watch.
  4. 0
    April 4 2026 17: 28
    There was an article on VO 4-5 years ago about how the Houthis, using similar technology and a Soviet air defense missile, shot down an F-15. I emphasize, 5 years ago, and not even Iranians, but aborigines in slippers.
    1. +7
      April 4 2026 17: 40
      Maybe some natives still studied in Soviet academies?
  5. +7
    April 4 2026 17: 47
    A good explanation: the Fu-15 crew was simply unlucky. 😂 But the crews of the helicopter and the Warthog, maybe even both, were also unlucky. It's a real black streak for the US Air Force. Let them stick to it.
    1. Eug
      +1
      April 5 2026 11: 11
      Let the stripe that seems black to them today, seem white tomorrow....
    2. 0
      April 5 2026 13: 44
      Iran has an island of bad luck.
  6. +1
    April 4 2026 17: 50
    US Colonel: Iran used passive infrared equipment to destroy F-15s

    Is this a statement of fact or regret? Did you really think the IRGC would shoot down planes with spears and crossbows? I don't know if Iran has sufficient MANPADS—the sheer audacity of low-flying American aircraft is astounding...
    1. +3
      April 4 2026 19: 25
      Quote: yuriy55
      Does Iran have sufficient stockpiles of MANPADS?

      There was a recent report that Iran purchased a batch of Igla-S MANPADS from Russia! Even if this is a hoax, it's worth knowing that Iran produces three types of its own MANPADS!
  7. 0
    April 4 2026 18: 10
    While Russian and Chinese clones of the air defense system are in use, more advanced air defense systems have not yet been deployed. I wouldn't be surprised if they were rolled out to meet the Airborne Forces' airborne forces; it would be a real challenge...
  8. -1
    April 4 2026 18: 21
    What did they use there...is it important?
    This fact also struck me.
  9. +3
    April 4 2026 19: 14
    The "358" missile isn't a drone at all, or even a drone-missile hybrid! The SAM is equipped with a turbojet engine, allowing you to arrive early for a meeting and have a smoke on the sidelines while waiting for the rendezvous! Yes, the missile has the characteristics of products that are now being (!) called a drone-missile hybrid (or a "drone-missile")! But the funny thing is, when the Iranians designed the "358," they weren't thinking of "drone-missiles"! "It just happened that way!" Like Uncle Petya, who, while inventing the latest moonshine still, accidentally invented a microwave!
  10. -2
    April 4 2026 23: 19
    As long as they kill sheep, I don't care, just like Yaem.
  11. -1
    April 5 2026 07: 48
    These are most likely Svir cameras, planted by China. Optical radars are the future; they don't emit radiation; they've finally started using modern technology. A drone like the Geran-2 with a Svir camera, a computer, and a digital feed is all it takes, and you've got yourself a modern, flying OVACS (long-range optical surveillance radar) system. laughing
  12. 0
    April 6 2026 09: 41
    In the case of the American fighter, it was probably just “unlucky.”

    The Strela 10, manufactured in 1974, was mass-produced on various chassis.
    There's no need to talk about luck. Recent upgrades have significantly improved targeting capabilities and raised the firing ceiling to 11 km, and the missiles now have seekers that are much more difficult to confuse with heat flares.