The new US military budget proposal for 2027 does not mention Ukraine at all.

The Trump administration has planned to adopt a record military budget in history. history The United States, but did not include in it the allocation of funds to support Ukraine.

The White House's draft military budget for fiscal year 2027, which begins October 1, 2026, does not include any military aid to Kyiv. The 92-page document makes no mention of Ukraine. In other words, all support programs for the Kyiv regime will be suspended next year if this document is approved by Congress.

The American administration did not provide assistance to Kyiv either through the supply of weapons and ammunition, or in the form of additional financial tranches.

There are also no provisions for spending on humanitarian aid, he notes. RIA News.

However, the US doesn't want to offend itself; the new military budget allocates $1,5 trillion and includes numerous military programs that must be implemented to restore and enhance US combat potential. After the harsh blow from Iran, the Americans urgently need to replenish their reserves, and Ukraine is no longer an option. It seems Zelenskyy will have to beg exclusively in Europe next year if the fighting hasn't ended by then.

Comments

[TermNachTer]

The moose cub is very small - there won't be enough for everyone)))

[pudelartemon]

To confidently rule out aid to Ukraine in 2027, we must confidently rule out its existence already this year.

[Arkady007]

No conclusions can be drawn from this, because the enemy for the United States, according to their general development strategy, is Russia and China.

[Zoldat_A]

Quote: Arkady007

No conclusions can be drawn from this.

Why do they need to mention Ukraine in the budget, especially in the expenditure section?
If things continue as they are now, the revenue side will be "Arms Sales to Europe." And what Europe does with the weapons is of NO interest to them. Although you can't hide an elephant in a china shop, and it's clear to everyone from the start that the weapons will go to Ukraine.
And the line "Satellite communications for the Ukrainian Armed Forces and intelligence transmission" won't be included in the expenditure section. They'll limit it to terms like "Satellite communications for the needs of the army" and "Intelligence cooperation" or something similar.

So I don’t see any reason to be happy that they didn’t mention Ukraine.

[Reptiloid]

Good evening, Igor. ! You're absolutely right. The spending items for Ukraine can be called anything and be passed through other ministries. What interests me, for example, is how the audit of Ukraine spending under Biden will turn out? After all, Trump immediately said that not all the billions allocated were spent correctly. And he also said he knew about the EU theft. Much can be expected from this audit and Trump's reaction to the theft of American $$$.

[Zoldat_A]

Dmitry, !

Quote: Reptiloid

How will the audit of Ukraine's spending end under Biden?

Why pay auditors to investigate something, waste time and money?
You said it yourself

Quote: Reptiloid

Trump immediately stated that the billions allocated to the EU were not all spent wisely. He also stated that he was aware of the EU's theft.

In their "democratic" society this is enough.
It's very similar to a jury trial. The jury has the final say in determining guilt—Trump already identified the culprits as a candidate. And the auditors, like a judge in a jury determining the sentence, will count the grams and determine the amount stolen.
And I suspect Trump will have his say here too. If the figure seems small enough to expose the scale of corruption among Democrats and Biden personally, they'll boldly scale it up. Who's going to recount it?

[Reptiloid]

Yes, Igor! You're right, it's clear how the audit will end. Just after this and the following series ---- revelations, accusations, punishments, Trump's anger, demands for money

[lubesky]

"An unprecedented allocation of funds," "almost a trillion dollars," "since the armed forces have not been allocated the necessary amount of funds for decades," "to develop new equipment and weapons, purchase them, and put them into service"...etc.

[TermNachTer]

Lockheed, Northrop, Boeing are thrilled))) That kind of money is too much to cut)))

[sdivt]

The White House's draft of the new military budget for the 2027 fiscal year, which begins on October 1, 2026, does not provide for the allocation of military aid to Kyiv... In other words, all programs supporting the Kyiv regime will not work next year if this document is approved in Congress.

Not really nothing
In December 2025, the US Congress passed the annual National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which provides for the allocation of $400 million annually for military aid to Ukraine (through the USAI initiative) specifically for 2026 and 2027 financial years
So, they'll still get something anyway.
But it's less, much less (many times less!) than the cash flows of previous years. For comparison and a sense of scale:
2022: $53,7 billion
2023: $59,8 billion
2024: $60,8 billion
2025 ~$3,9 billion

[Aerolab]

Looks like the redhead's stuck in a big d...m and doesn't know how to get out. Like that sparrow that landed in cow dung...

[Dmitry Rigov]

Come on, as long as the US isn't being hit by missiles, they're winning anyway. The Eurasian continent is currently in a highly unstable situation that risks escalating into a new world war, and in such a case, we know who the winner will be.

[gsev]

Quote: Aerolab

Looks like the redhead sat down in a big d...m.

Russia poses no threat to the United States. For Russia, the main and real threats are the revival of Nazism in Europe, German militarism supported by German satellites from the Finns to the Bulgarians, and Islamic extremism.

[Kotofeich]

Should we rejoice or cry about this?

[fruc]

Kotofeich
Should we rejoice or cry about this?

In addition to budget funds, there are also contributions from private investors. And if private businesses are interested, the outskirts will continue to receive funds, plus income from frozen Russian assets.

[pudelartemon]

I suggest a drink, a hearty grunt, and a snack! It's Friday after all.

[Junior Private]

What nonsense is this? No one will give Mask any money for intelligence work either? They will, of course they will, but only through third parties. Everything will be done through third parties. Weakening Russia as economically as possible and killing the last kakel—these are the modern Anglo-Saxon goals of today. There's no need to read, much less take to heart, the news stories about the kakels joining the EU, NATO, and other such nonsense. But the raguli's brains are incompetent. It's just nature. I won't quote Darwin on natural selection.

[opuonmed]

Well, the EU will pay, and maybe the US will adopt something later.

[alexputnik17]

Great news! It would be great if it was implemented.
Trump turns on the printing press!
You can't live on paper and 1s. After Iran, the Americans will be rebuilding their reserves for at least five years. IMHO.
And I’m worried about Ze. I think this news will make a junkie sniff a couple of extra roads today.

[Andrei Nikolaevich]

We must give the Americans their due. They quickly grasped what Ukrainianism and Ukrainians are and how this affects the state budget. They've been mentioned in our "budget" for 300 years. And the jumping around on the Maidan and songs about "Muscovites and gilyaks" are their "gratitude."

[abc_alex]

The new military budget includes $1,5 trillion in funding and multiple military programs.

One and a half trillion... holy shit.
The world is full of countries with lower annual GDPs. And it's not the Marshall Islands, far from it. It's almost every country in the world. Only 15 countries on the planet have an annual GDP of over $1,5 trillion.
1 US 27,720,700
2 China 17,794,782
3 Germany 4,525,704
4 Japan 4,204,495
5 India 3,575,778
6 UK 3,380,855
7 France 3,051,832
8 Italy 2,300,941
9 Brazil 2 191 132
10 Canada 2,142,471
11 Russia 2,008,419
12 Republic of Korea 1,839,058
13 Mexico 1,793,799
14 Australia 1,775,628
15 Spain 1,620,091

At the same time, the US also has the largest national debt
USA - $38,27 trillion.
China - $18,68 trillion.
Japan - $9,83 trillion.
United Kingdom - $4,09 trillion.
France - $3,92 trillion.
Italy - $3,48 trillion.
India - $3,36 trillion.
Germany - $3,23 trillion.
Canada - $2,60 trillion.
Brazil - $2,06 trillion.
Spain - $1,90 trillion.
Mexico - $1,10 trillion.
Singapore - $1,01 trillion.
South Korea - $0,99 trillion.
Australia - $0,93 trillion.

This is just some kind of...

[Dmitry Rigov]

Their public debt is large only in absolute terms; relative to GDP, it's not that significant. Japan's public debt, for example, is twice as large (260%) as the US's (128%). And besides, it's denominated in its own currency, meaning the Federal Reserve's printing press will forgive them everything. Yes, there will be inflation, but given that the entire world uses the dollar, it will be spread across everyone.

[abc_alex]

Quote: Dmitry Rigov

Their public debt is large only in absolute terms; relative to GDP, it's not that significant. Japan's public debt, for example, is twice as large (260%) as the US's (128%). And besides, it's denominated in its own currency, meaning the Federal Reserve's printing press will forgive them everything. Yes, there will be inflation, but given that the entire world uses the dollar, it will be spread across everyone.

These are your "liberal economic" misconceptions, based on the idea that money is a commodity. And that it doesn't matter how much you owe, what matters is whether you can service the debt. And the most important thing is the exchange rate. In fact, money is NOT a commodity. It's an IOU. An obligation to provide ANY physically available commodity at any time. If this condition is not met, the money loses its meaning. So, an excess of debt over GDP means that the US is unable to provide all the dollars with goods. And the "exporting inflation" mechanism you correctly describe is not a guarantee of unsinkability; it only allows us to avoid drowning here and now. Moreover, don't forget that the US financial market is a mechanism that makes money out of money, bypassing any commodity production whatsoever. And at the beginning of the year, no less than 69 trillion dollars were circulating in this market. And all of this is also DEBT. One way or another, sooner or later, all these stocks, bonds, derivatives, and futures will require commodity collateral. But it doesn't exist. And it won't. After all, global GDP isn't all that high, according to the World Bank—just over $111 trillion—and it's declining. That means there's already no supply of goods anywhere in the world to cover the US debt. And if all this collapses... The Fed and their machine will simply hide under their bunk...

[Dmitry Rigov]

This is an IOU.

Exactly. But you're missing an important detail: these are IOUs with a specific maturity date. They're not one-time payments; they can be refinanced against a new debt issue, and the US can service this debt without any problems.

One way or another, sooner or later all these stocks, bonds, derivatives and futures will require commodity collateral.

Sooner or later, this will continue for a very long time, and inflation will continue to drag it out for decades to come.

[cat Crush]

Does this mean there won't be any US aid to Ukraine? All hope lies in Europe, where Kaja Kallas (KaKa) is.

[Sebenza]

Just once every hundred years they merge into a puddle to skim off the cream.

[Altai2026]

In fact, yes! Only reconnaissance assistance is needed, otherwise we don't even have enough missiles for ourselves!

[1944-1989]

What a gloomy guy in the picture. Merry Christmas!