"Shvidun" vs. "Geran"

10 787 22
"Shvidun" vs. "Geran"
The Shvidun UAV. Graphics by the Ministry of Defense of Ukraine


Ukraine continues to search for means and systems to defend against Russian attack drones. The next solution to this problem should be a specialized UAV- an interceptor called "Shvidun." It is claimed that it has already reached serial production and combat use. Moreover, this UAV has demonstrated high effectiveness against typical aerial targets.



Latest development


About the new Ukrainian UAV for Defense This became known on April 1. The Ukrainian Defense Ministry revealed for the first time the existence of the "Shvidun" (Ukrainian for "fast") system and published an image of it. They also announced the start of combat use of the new UAVs and the results of this process. However, some information of interest remains classified.

The organization that developed the Shvidun UAV and launched its production has not been disclosed. The project's completion timeline is also uncertain. However, all development work has been completed. The interceptor drone has passed tests, and based on these results, it has been moved into serial production.

Serial UAVs have been deployed to air defense units. It is claimed that such equipment is now being used to organize air defense of cities and important facilities. Details of these processes, for obvious reasons, are not being disclosed.

The new Shvidun missiles have reportedly entered combat use. These systems are being used to intercept Russian attack UAVs like the Geran-2. As always, the Ukrainian side hasn't forgotten to boast of its successes. It is claimed that the Bystrye missiles have intercepted and destroyed at least a hundred attack UAVs to date.

However, no evidence is provided to support this claim. No objective monitoring data or other information is presented to support the claims of the Shviduns' success. Furthermore, the intensity of their use and the success rate of combat sorties are questionable. It is highly likely that the actual combat results of the new UAVs do not give Ukrainian militants cause for optimism.

Technical features


The Shvidun is a fixed-wing UAV of medium size and weight. This interceptor is designed to take off on alert or patrol a designated area in search of a target. Once a dangerous object is detected, the operator directs the UAV toward it.


Modern Russian attack UAVs. Photo: Russian Ministry of Defense

The interceptor drone is built using a twin-boom design. It has a torpedo-shaped fuselage of limited length, to which a straight wing is attached. Two tail booms are attached to the wing, each containing a stabilizer and a pair of vertical stabilizers. The wingspan of this UAV reaches 2 meters, while its overall length is significantly shorter. Its takeoff weight is set at 8 kg.

Almost the entire UAV structure is made of plastic, which simplifies production and provides the desired combination of characteristics. The airframe is said to incorporate new technologies that reduce vibrations in various flight modes. Specifically, this has improved the performance of the optoelectronic systems.

The Shvidun has an electric propulsion system. An electric motor with a pusher propeller, batteries, and controls are mounted inside the fuselage. The UAV is claimed to reach speeds of up to 250 km/h and can climb to an altitude of up to 6000 m. The unmanned system has a range of 70 km and can remain airborne for up to two hours.

The launch method is unclear. A ground catapult is likely used. If necessary, the Shvidun can land, possibly using a parachute. After the necessary preparations, the UAV can fly again.

Apparently, the UAV is equipped only with a remote control system. The operator receives a signal from the on-board video camera and sends commands to the drone. There is no information about any automation of navigation, piloting, or guidance processes.

How the Shvidun hits its target is unknown. It was likely equipped with a high-explosive fragmentation warhead. The UAV's limited takeoff weight precludes the use of a heavy warhead, but even then, it is possible to inflict significant damage on the target. Kinetic interception is also possible, but this does not seem feasible given various factors.

Unanswered Questions


Thus, Ukraine has developed and, as reported, even brought another unmanned aerial vehicle to combat use. aviation A system for countering Russian attack UAVs. There's renewed talk of a cutting-edge, highly effective model that's already demonstrating its capabilities.


A Ukrainian Sting interceptor drone. Photo: Telegram / Military Informant

However, the actual potential of the Shvidun system remains uncertain. Judging by its stated characteristics, such a UAV could indeed be used in air defense and against attack drones. However, its effectiveness remains questionable.

First and foremost, the new UAV's flight performance raises doubts. Its stated maximum speed is 250 km/h. In theory, the Shvidun could outrun the Geran-2 or similar drones. However, the speed difference is small, which should make it difficult to pursue a target or intercept it on a collision course.

A twin-boom, straight-wing aircraft must have limited maneuverability. This circumstance further complicates the interception of aerial targets, even the simplest ones. A limited-mass high-explosive fragmentation warhead or kinetic interception require the interceptor to be targeted with a high degree of precision, and low maneuverability can hinder this process.

Against this backdrop, Ukraine's claims about the Shvidun's high performance appear quite odd. They seem more like an advertisement for a new development, upon which great hopes are pinned. Interested individuals and organizations may be praising the new UAV to attract the attention of the military and secure additional production contracts.

Drones vs. drones


It's worth noting that the Shvidun project isn't Ukraine's first attempt to create a specialized interceptor drone. Over the past few years, Ukrainian organizations, either independently or with the assistance of foreign colleagues, have developed a number of similar systems. UAVs of various sizes with varying characteristics and capabilities are being offered. Furthermore, foreign partners are also supplying similar products to Ukraine.

In all cases, the discussion revolves around attempts to develop new systems for intercepting attack UAVs. These systems are required to be relatively simple and inexpensive while still offering sufficient combat performance. Each time, it is reported that a new model of this class fully meets these requirements and should make a significant contribution to the fight against Geraniums.

However, in practice, the capabilities of interceptor drones often prove limited. Problems arise in organizing such air defenses, in the use of new UAVs, etc. As a result, attack drones infiltrate their targets en masse and inflict damage.

This time, Ukrainian forces are pinning their hopes on the new Shvidun UAV. Moreover, its high effectiveness and other successes are already being reported. However, the drone's ability to impact the current situation remains highly questionable.
22 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    April 6 2026 04: 43
    However, the difference in speed is small, which should prevent pursuit of the target or interception on a collision course.

    The chase is understandable, but why would low speed prevent an interception on a head-on course? That's what head-on is for: to reach a predetermined altitude and slowly establish a counter-course. And then the target runs into you...
    1. +2
      April 6 2026 05: 12
      Quote: Vladimir_2U
      Why does low speed interfere with interception on a collision course?

      It doesn't interfere at all... You just need to take a flight in advance and know the speed and direction of the Geraniums coming...
      1. 0
        April 6 2026 05: 32
        Quote from Uncle Lee
        You just need to take up a flight in advance and know the speed and direction of the Geraniums coming...

        I'm afraid that the Khikhlovs have a slight problem with this.
        1. +3
          April 6 2026 05: 50
          Quote: Vladimir_2U
          Quote from Uncle Lee
          You just need to take up a flight in advance and know the speed and direction of the Geraniums coming...

          I'm afraid that the Khikhlovs have a slight problem with this.
          what It would be good if we could learn how to avoid problems with enemy drone attacks ourselves. Just a couple of hours ago, a DW news thread mentioned that a terminal in Novorossiysk was on fire... winked

          The drone's primary target was the Sheskharis oil terminal in the port of Novorossiysk, Astra reported after analyzing video footage from local residents. Judging by the footage, a massive fire broke out at the facility. The Ukrainian OSINT channel Dnipro reports that the oil loading pier at Sheskharis is on fire.
          https://www.dw.com/ru/ukrainskie-drony-atakovali-neftanoj-terminal-v-portu-novorossijska-est-ranenye/a-76675695

          Is there any point in grinning if the opponent continues to deliver such sensitive blows? request
          1. 0
            April 6 2026 06: 12
            Quote: Vl Nemchinov
            Is there any point in grinning if the opponent continues to deliver such sensitive blows?

            Neither I nor my namesake are even close to being sarcastic.

            Quote: Vl Nemchinov
            It would be good to learn how to avoid problems with enemy UAV attacks.
            We're talking about the Ukrainian acoustic UAV detection system. So, detection and approximate calculation of course and altitude aren't a problem. The problem is the weapons.
      2. ANB
        +1
        April 6 2026 11: 52
        You just need to take up a flight in advance and know the speed and direction of the Geraniums coming...

        And prohibit the Geraniums from maneuvering.
    2. AVP
      -2
      April 6 2026 10: 42
      How do you get on course? The operator will get tired of trying to catch you on a collision course. On the ground, it seems like a simple task. But reality (and physics) are a bit tougher.
      1. +1
        April 6 2026 10: 52
        Quote: AVP
        How do I enter the course?
        With eyes and hands. With timely targeting, this is a minor problem.

        Quote: AVP
        But reality (and physics) is a little harsher.
        Was physics different during the war? Combined speeds reached 1000 km/h, and nothing happened, they fired at each other and even rammed each other head-on. But here the combined speed was 500, maybe 700 km/h.
        1. AVP
          -3
          April 6 2026 10: 57
          And what kind of modern target designator is this? The eyes of Nikola, sitting at the monitor? Judging by the model, they didn't reveal anything more.
  2. -3
    April 6 2026 05: 15
    Shvidun? I understand Ukrainian pretty well, even though I don't speak it. Why rack my brains? But this name has me stumped. How can I translate it into Russian? "Shvidka Nastya" is colloquial slang for diarrhea. Maybe "shvidun" means the same thing, but in literary Ukrainian newspeak? Any thoughts? Share. laughing
    1. +3
      April 6 2026 07: 24
      Well, if shvidkiy means fast, then shvidun is something like a shustrik
    2. 0
      April 6 2026 18: 20
      "Shvydko" means "quickly," "shvydun" probably means "bystrik." Although, who knows? They have a hearing aid, so why not a Balakovo? And there are so many examples like that. "Car" is in the "avtivka" language. I studied Ukrainian in a Ukrainian school, where all the subjects were taught in Ukrainian. There was no such nonsense.
  3. -7
    April 6 2026 05: 16
    For every Shvidun we have our own Harpoon
  4. BAI
    0
    April 6 2026 08: 38
    I have written many times that the development of UAVs is following the path of aviation: first bombers and reconnaissance aircraft, then fighters.
  5. +4
    April 6 2026 09: 52
    A twin-boom, straight-wing aircraft must have limited maneuverability.

    The German Focke-Wulf Fw 189 (Frame), built according to exactly this design, had simply phenomenal maneuverability, which made it very difficult for our fighters to attack it.
    However, in practice, the capabilities of interceptor drones are often limited.

    Ukrainians are making extensive use of inexpensive interceptors—the Sting and P1-Sun tailsitters—with their production rampant and the number of their uses constantly growing. There are numerous videos on Facebook showing them being used for interception. Judging by the videos, they're used to engage targets in pursuit.
    As a result, attack drones are breaking through to their targets en masse.

    The author's imagination knows no bounds. There haven't been any mass strikes for a long time. Under current conditions, most Geraniums are intercepted. You can't expect a good idea to last forever; sooner or later, the enemy will find a countermeasure, which is what we're seeing now :(. They're currently trying to use high-speed jet Geraniums.
    1. 0
      April 6 2026 11: 03
      Quote from solar
      The German Focke-Wulf Fw 189 (Frame), built according to exactly this design, had simply phenomenal maneuverability, which made it very difficult for our fighters to attack it.

      The frame had two motors, and it rotated perfectly thanks to them, or rather, by providing different amounts of thrust when maneuvering. Plus, it had excellent visibility to the rear.
  6. AVP
    -2
    April 6 2026 10: 47
    IMHO, it's a marketing gimmick. I seriously doubt this little thing can consistently maintain a speed of 250, except in ideal weather conditions and on a straight line. It should maneuver quite well.
  7. -4
    April 6 2026 12: 03
    These devices are being used to intercept Russian attack UAVs like the Geran-2. As always, the Ukrainian side didn't forget to boast about its successes.

    What about Gerani-5 and below? And if around 100 were shot down, is there any video of the miraculous victories? recourse
  8. +1
    April 6 2026 16: 05
    I'm interested in what capabilities an attacking drone has to detect an attack by a defensive drone.
    In this case, an automatic evasive maneuver would be relatively easy to program...
  9. +1
    April 6 2026 17: 31
    No need to invent.

    Fast - Shvydkyi (Ukr)

    Therefore, there is no need to translate it; it could be an acronym or the last name of the development team leader.
  10. +1
    April 6 2026 22: 21
    The Antonov Design Bureau has already produced a production attack UAV with a twin-boom configuration. And they are actively used.
  11. 0
    April 26 2026 07: 00
    I understand that the Genani-2 propeller spins at 5000 rpm. It can't be upgraded. A three- or five-blade propeller would also increase thrust. Or we're skimping in the wrong places again. We need modernization, improved performance characteristics, and an increase in drone launch rates to 1000 per day. Only then will the Banderites in the Volga Federal District be depleted.