A Missile for the "Black Lady": How the USSR Closed the Skies to Spy Planes

9 981 39
A Missile for the "Black Lady": How the USSR Closed the Skies to Spy Planes


The late 1950s. The Cold War is gaining momentum, and information is becoming a key resource. Where exactly is the USSR hiding its missilesHow many bombers are stationed at the Ural airfields? How is the nuclear testing program progressing? The answers to these questions were worth more than any spy network. Washington needed a tool capable of peering behind the Iron Curtain from above—where no anti-aircraft gun could reach. artillery, nor jet fighters.



The U-2, designed by the legendary Clarence Johnson at Lockheed, became that instrument. "The Game," as the CIA dubbed it, could soar at altitudes of over twenty kilometers, beyond the reach of contemporary interceptors. Unarmed, with its spreading wings reminiscent of a glider, the U-2 carried cameras and signals intelligence equipment. It seemed nothing could stop it.


Clarence L. Johnson led Lockheed's research department for more than 40 years, earning a reputation as an "organizational genius." Photo: US Air Force

But engineers on the other side of the ocean weren't sitting idle. Back in November 1953, the USSR Council of Ministers decreed the creation of a mobile anti-aircraft missile system—a system capable of striking targets at high altitudes. The task was ambitious: it was necessary to combine radar, an autopilot, a liquid-propellant rocket engine, and radio command guidance into a mobile unit that could be quickly deployed and folded.

The development was divided. The guidance station and control system were entrusted to KB-1, headed by Alexander Raspletin and Grigory Kisunko. The missile was assigned to OKB-2, headed by Pyotr Grushin. The sustainer engine was created by A. F. Isaev. The radio-controlled fuse was designed by NII-504. The warhead by NII-6. The launchers were designed by B. S. Korobov at TsKB-34. The cooperation involved dozens of enterprises, and the deadlines were compressed to the limit.

The U-2 aircraft and the S-75 anti-aircraft missile system began their journey towards each other at practically the same time; both were created with broad cooperation between enterprises, in a short timeframe, and outstanding engineers and scientists took part in their creation.

A simplified version of the system, the SA-75 Dvina, was accepted into service in December 1957. By May 1959, the more advanced S-75 Desna, armed with a new-generation missile, had arrived. By 1960, eighty regiments had entered combat duty. But it was impossible to cover the entire territory of the USSR—one-sixth of the earth's surface. Corridors remained between the coverage zones, and the U-2s skillfully exploited them.

The final flight took place on May 1, 1960. CIA reconnaissance pilot Francis Gary Powers took off from an airbase in Peshawar, headed north, and soon crossed the Soviet border. The route took him over the Ural Mountains to Sverdlovsk, where secret facilities were located.

Powers didn't know that they were already waiting for him. The Soviet command Defense The flight was tracked from the moment it entered airspace. When the "Game" entered range of the anti-aircraft missile battalion, the order was given. They fired three times. The first missile missed. The second hit its target. The third, according to some reports, shot down a Soviet MiG-19 that scrambled to intercept, killing its pilot.

The catalyst for the development of a specialized high-altitude reconnaissance aircraft was the Soviet Union's success in creating nuclear weapons. weapons, especially the 1953 test of the first Soviet hydrogen bomb, as well as reports from military attachés on the development of the M-4 strategic bomber. Furthermore, an attempt by the British in the first half of 1953 to photograph the Soviet missile test site at Kapustin Yar using a modernized high-altitude Canberra failed—the pilots barely escaped. Work on the U-2 began at Lockheed in 1954, commissioned by the CIA, and was conducted in great secrecy. The aircraft's development was led by the prominent aircraft designer Clarence L. Johnson (1910–1990).


During operation, the U-2 was constantly upgraded by US military engineers. But soon the need for this disappeared: reconnaissance aircraft replaced satellites. Photo: US Air Force / Senior Airman Levi Riendeau

The U-2 was a subsonic (maximum flight speed at 18,300 m was 855 km/h, cruising speed 740 km/h) unarmed strategic reconnaissance aircraft, capable of flying at an altitude "inaccessible" to contemporary fighters – over 20 km. The aircraft was powered by a J-57-P-7 turbojet engine with powerful superchargers and a thrust of 4763 kg. The large-span mid-wing (24,38 meters with an aircraft length of 15,11 meters) and aspect ratio not only gave the aircraft the appearance of a glider but also allowed it to glide with the engine off. This also contributed to its exceptional flight range. For the same purpose, the design was made as light as possible, and the fuel supply was increased to the maximum possible - in addition to the internal tanks with a capacity of 2970 liters, the aircraft carried two underwing tanks with a capacity of 395 liters, which were dropped during the first stage of the flight.

"Game"


The development of a specialized high-altitude reconnaissance aircraft was spurred by the Soviet Union's advances in nuclear weapons development, particularly the 1953 test of the first Soviet hydrogen bomb, as well as reports from military attachés on the development of the M-4 strategic bomber. Furthermore, a British attempt in the first half of 1953 to photograph the Soviet missile test site at Kapustin Yar using a modernized high-altitude Canberra failed—the pilots barely escaped. Work on the U-2 began at Lockheed in 1954, commissioned by the CIA, and was conducted in great secrecy. The aircraft's development was led by the prominent aircraft designer Clarence L. Johnson (1910–1990).

The development of a 6-centimeter range radar with moving target selection (MTS), but in order to speed up the process, it was initially decided to adopt a simplified version with a 10-centimeter range locator on already mastered devices and without MTS.

"Hunter"


On November 20, 1953, the USSR Council of Ministers adopted a resolution on the development of a transportable air defense missile system, designated the S-75 (System-75). The technical specifications were approved by the 4th Main Directorate of the Ministry of Defense in early 1954. The very task of creating a mobile medium-range system with a high altitude reach was quite ambitious for the time. Given the tight deadlines and the unresolved nature of several issues, attractive features such as multi-channel capability (the ability to simultaneously engage multiple targets) and missile homing had to be abandoned.


The C-75 anti-aircraft missile system could hit targets at a distance of up to 43 km at speeds up to 2300 km / h. It was the most widely used air defense system for the entire history Soviet air defense forces. Photo from the archive US DoD

A simplified version of the system with the 1D (V-750) missile was adopted by the Decree of the Council of Ministers and the Central Committee of the CPSU on December 11, 1957, under the designation SA-75 "Dvina." And already in May 1959, the S-75 "Desna" anti-aircraft missile system with the V-750VN (13D) missile and a 6-centimeter-range radar was accepted into service.

Powers ejected. His parachute landed him in a field on the Krasny Oktyabr collective farm near Sverdlovsk. The pilot was detained by local residents and soldiers. He was alive, unharmed, and—most importantly—he and the plane did not explode.

Upon learning of the plane's loss, the Americans issued an official statement: one of NASA's research vehicles had deviated from its course due to a problem with its oxygen supply. Moscow remained silent, and Washington decided it had been a success. At a press conference on May 5, Khrushchev personally announced that Soviet missiles had shot down the American spy plane and presented the wreckage. The pilot was alive. Cameras, instruments, and the coded pad—everything was still there. The lie was exposed publicly, on stage, before the entire world.

President Eisenhower found himself trapped by his own misinformation. The upcoming Paris summit of the four powers – the USSR, the USA, Great Britain, and France – was disrupted. Khrushchev demanded an apology, but Eisenhower refused. The negotiations reached a deadlock. The Cold War gained new momentum.

The U-2C shot down over Sverdlovsk carried radio and radar emission recording equipment in its nose. The aircraft was equipped with an A-10 autopilot, an MR-1 compass, ARN-6 and ARS-34UHF radios, and a retractable camera.

The landing gear had a curious appearance: two retractable landing gears were mounted in tandem under the fuselage. Another two gears were located under the wing surfaces and were released at the start of the takeoff roll. Initially, technicians ran alongside the aircraft, pulling the gears with cables; later, the process was automated. During landing, when the wing sagged due to loss of speed, it rested on the ground with its downward-curved wingtips. The U-2's service ceiling reached 21,350 meters (70,000 ft), its operational radius was 3540 kilometers (2,150 mi) without external fuel tanks and 4185 kilometers (2,900 mi) with external fuel tanks, and its maximum range was 6435 kilometers (4,100 mi).

To reduce its visibility, the U-2 had a smooth, polished surface. Its black, low-reflective coating earned it the nickname "the Black Lady of Spycraft" (a derivative of the U-2's original nickname, "Dragon Lady"). The spy plane, of course, carried no identifying markings. A U-2 pilot's job—even without its dubious status—wasn't easy: up to eight to nine hours in a high-altitude suit and helmet, without the right to communicate via radio, alone with a very demanding aircraft, especially during gliding. When landing, the pilot had poor visibility of the runway, so a high-speed car was deployed alongside, from which another pilot gave instructions via radio.

Powers was tried. He received a ten-year prison sentence for espionage. But he served less than two. On February 10, 1962, an exchange took place on the Glienicke Bridge in Berlin: Soviet spy Rudolf Abel, convicted in the United States, was exchanged for an American pilot. The operation became the first in a series of spy swaps that firmly earned the bridge its nickname – the "Bridge of Spies."

The loss of the U-2 near Sverdlovsk spurred work in the United States on the SR-71 supersonic strategic reconnaissance aircraft, also from Lockheed. But neither this loss, nor the Taiwanese U-2 shot down by the Chinese Air Force near Nanchang on September 9, 1962 (the Chinese later shot down three more U-2s), nor the American U-2 shot down by a Soviet S-75 air defense system over Cuba on October 27 of that year (the pilot was killed), ended the U-2's career. They underwent several upgrades (the U-2R, TR-1A, and other modifications) and continued to serve into the 1990s.

The surface-to-air missile was a two-stage missile with a solid-fuel booster and a liquid-fueled cruise engine. This combined high readiness and thrust-to-weight ratio at launch with engine efficiency during the main phase of flight. Combined with the chosen guidance method, it reduced the flight time to the target. Target tracking was performed automatically or manually, or automatically by angular coordinates and manually by range.


Radar installation of C-75 ADMS in the Egyptian desert. The USSR sold C-75 not only to socialist camp states, but also to third world countries. In particular, Egypt, Libya and India. Photo: Sgt. Stan Tarver / US DoD

The guidance station simultaneously guided three missiles to a single target. The rotation of the guidance station's antenna post and the launchers was coordinated so that the missile, after launch, would enter a sector of space scanned by the radar. The SA-75 Dvina hit targets flying at speeds of up to 1100 km/h, at ranges of 7 to 22–29 kilometers and at altitudes of 3 to 22 kilometers. The first S-75 regiment was placed on combat duty in 1958, and by 1960, 80 such regiments had been deployed. But they covered only the most important Soviet installations. For such a large country, this was insufficient, and Powers' U-2C managed to penetrate deep into the Soviet Union before it was within range of the new system.

Incidentally, the U-2 wasn't the S-75's first "trophy." On October 7, 1959, a Dvina system, handed over to "Chinese comrades," shot down a Taiwanese RB-57D reconnaissance aircraft under the guidance of Soviet specialists. And in 1965, the S-75 began its glorious campaign in Vietnam. In the following years, a whole family of S-75 anti-aircraft missile systems emerged (the S-75M, S-75D, S-75M Volkhov, S-75 Volga, and others), serving in the USSR and abroad.

The downing of the U-2 was more than just a military success – it demonstrated that technical superiority does not guarantee impunity. The "unreachable height" proved achievable. The USSR gained missile cover. And the Cold War reached a new point of tension, the consequences of which would be felt for decades to come.
39 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    April 9 2026 04: 38
    Even now, it's not easy to shoot down a U-2 at such an altitude...the US only had a hard time shooting down a Chinese balloon at high altitude...and that was after several attempts.
    The plane is good...as a drone now...it has everything for reconnaissance.
    1. +6
      April 9 2026 05: 49
      Quote: The same LYOKHA
      In the US, they managed to shoot down a Chinese balloon at high altitude with great difficulty...and only after several attempts.

      It was not only a matter of height, but also of the specific nature of the object being destroyed.
      1. +1
        April 9 2026 06: 32
        Quote: Vladislav_V
        It was not only a matter of height, but also of the specific nature of the object being destroyed.

        It's like that... smile If the specifics of this object were transferred to the U-2, it would be absolutely beautiful. what
        1. +5
          April 9 2026 07: 38
          So how will you accommodate these specific features? Firstly, a balloon is virtually invisible to radar (no metal parts), and secondly, the altitude is up to 35 km. It's more likely to accommodate the U2's specific features, installing some kind of solar-powered engine (thankfully, there are no clouds).
          1. 0
            April 9 2026 21: 52
            Quote: Victor Sergeev
            secondly, the height is up to 35 km.

            The Chinese high-altitude balloon that was shot down over the United States in February 2023 was shot down at an altitude of about 18-20 kilometers (or more than 60,000 feet) in the stratosphere.

            Quote: Victor Sergeev
            Firstly, the ball is almost invisible to radar (no metal parts)

            1. It is basking in the sun (the air temperature around is -65, its surface temperature is above zero)
            And it was shot down by a short-range AIM-9X missile with a thermal seeker (cooling the matrix with a Stirling engine)
    2. +6
      April 9 2026 07: 35
      It's immediately obvious you don't understand the difference between a U2 and a sounding balloon. A sounding balloon flies at altitudes of up to 35 km, which is inaccessible even to air defense missiles, let alone those carried by fighter jets. But the U2 flies at 21 km, a perfect target for both air defense missiles and interceptors like the MiG-25/31. Even an Su-35 can jump to 21 km by making a steep climb, although jumping isn't even necessary; just fire an air-to-air missile and you're out of reconnaissance.
    3. +2
      April 9 2026 09: 38
      Different things and heights - 20 km and 35.
      The whole article is a hodgepodge of bits and pieces. They've plucked it all together...
  2. +1
    April 9 2026 05: 07
    A great country, a leadership with will and determination, a powerful industry, and a multitude of talented scientists and engineers! And now...
    1. -1
      April 9 2026 17: 56
      And now we have a great country, a leadership with will and determination, and many talented scientists and engineers. Although there are those like you, forever whining like old women on benches.
      1. +1
        April 9 2026 21: 30
        😁😁😁😁 dreamer) especially about will and determination)
  3. dFG
    0
    April 9 2026 05: 44
    ..... and now we live only with memories of past greatness
  4. 0
    April 9 2026 05: 47
    Quote: Scipio
    A great country, a leadership with will and determination, a powerful industry, and a multitude of talented scientists and engineers! And now...

    And now they have barely started the SVO and immediately sat down at the negotiating table...
    1. +1
      April 9 2026 21: 31
      I'm sure you've already regretted starting all this 100 times over.
  5. -2
    April 9 2026 07: 31
    The loss of the U2 near Sverdlovsk is the result of incredible American stupidity. Given the S75's range, these idiots went straight for the missiles. The S75 in no way rendered the U2 useless; rather, the new interceptors and the missiles they carried did.
    1. 0
      April 10 2026 03: 19
      Quote: Victor Sergeev
      The loss of the U2 near Sverdlovsk is the result of the incredible stupidity of the Americans.

      Powers carried out the assigned task: reconnaissance of the enterprises of the Ministry of Medium Machine Building. "À la guerre comme à la guerre."
      U2 flights established the number of Soviet strategic bombers and the deployment of missiles in Cuba.
      The plane over Cuba was eventually shot down as well, but material for the Cuban Missile Crisis was obtained.
  6. +9
    April 9 2026 08: 37
    When describing the 75th complex now, the authors somehow forget that the problem of missile guidance was solved without any computers, using analog methods on vacuum tube technology, and that quite complex mathematical operations were implemented.
    Besides, in my opinion, it's enough to use "generated" images of the S-75, which has five missiles instead of six, and the "P" cabin is surrounded by some masts and trucks.
    1. +3
      April 9 2026 10: 25
      Quote: Hexenmeister
      Besides, in my opinion, it's enough to use "generated" images of the S-75, which has five missiles instead of six, and the "P" cabin is surrounded by some masts and trucks.

      You might also ask: where is the embankment, where are the TZMs, and how is the division going to fire and reload the launchers in such cramped conditions. laughing

      And yes, the trailer with the generator right under the SAM nozzle is especially annoying. However, the radar will also be damaged during launch.
    2. +4
      April 9 2026 10: 59
      Come on, the author compiled a compilation of well-known articles, but as for the details, how much and what...
      request
      Well, what do you expect, the author writes about "During its service life, the U-2 was constantly upgraded by American military engineers. But soon the need for this disappeared: reconnaissance aircraft were replaced by satellites.", while "...newest models (TR-1, U-2R, U-2S) entered service in the 1980s, and the latest model, the U-2S, had a technical upgrade in 2012. The U-2 is currently operated by the USAF and NASA."
      No.
      1. +7
        April 9 2026 13: 55
        Quote: Wildcat
        Come on, the author compiled a compilation of well-known articles, but as for the details, how much and what...

        In some places he gets confused in his testimony and doesn’t understand what he’s writing about... request
      2. The comment was deleted.
      3. WIS
        -1
        April 11 2026 02: 51
        Quote: Wildcat
        Well what do you want

        (-) for the lack of this translation.
        ..the newest models (TR-1, U-2R, U-2S) entered service in the 1980s, and the latest model, the U-2S, received a technical upgrade in 2012. The U-2 is now operated by the US Air Force and NASA.
  7. +6
    April 9 2026 09: 27
    This is a disjointed article. Parts are repeated. There's sometimes no connection between paragraphs. It's as if the author has carelessly cobbled something together from rough drafts and notes.
    1. +4
      April 9 2026 09: 43
      Quote: Aldmit_2
      This article is kind of chopped up. Parts are repeated.

      Yes, this is clearly not the way to write!
      1. +2
        April 9 2026 17: 33
        This is a new author on the site. In two weeks, 14 diverse articles have been published. Can you, with your experience, afford such rapid production? Hence the results.
        It would probably be better if the author's name was listed at the beginning of the article. Some articles could be skipped without wasting time scrolling.
        1. +2
          April 9 2026 17: 46
          Quote: balabol
          With your experience, can you afford such a rapid fire?

          Actually, I can, but only within the framework of long-established topics. I won't undertake to write about aviation; only vintage ships and the American Civil War, no rockets, in short... yes, I won't get an upset stomach from being omnivorous.
          1. +2
            April 9 2026 18: 04
            That's exactly what I'm getting at. When you have 60 characters of material on a topic, you can prepare three articles. It might be easier that way—you have to think less. But with different topics, it's more difficult.
            1. +2
              April 9 2026 18: 21
              Quote: balabol
              When there is 60 thousand characters of material on the topic,

              I've written before (and more than once!) that online journalism has its own rules (and laws!) that are foolish to break. The minimum length of a piece should be 8000 characters. More is possible – 9, 9,5, 10, and even 14, but with every thousand, the readability of the piece decreases, and the audience shrinks. It's considered that 14 is the limit! So 25, 30, and especially 60.000 are way out of reach... pointless. And I didn't come up with this; it's in all the online journalism textbooks. But for some reason, many people who start writing for online websites neglect theory, and in vain. For example, my collaboration with the magazine "Secrets of the 20th Century" really helped me. It went like this: an article is exactly 7500 characters long and you don't know more. Then exactly 190 characters for the interlinear translation. So write whatever you want!
              1. The comment was deleted.
    2. +1
      April 10 2026 03: 26
      Ideally, a written article should be put away in a drawer and left to sit for a few days. Then, reread and correct any rough edges.
      1. 0
        April 11 2026 05: 39
        Quote: Sensor
        Ideally, a written article should be put away in a drawer and left to sit for a few days. Then, reread and correct any rough edges.

        That's right. This is the best option!
  8. +1
    April 9 2026 09: 37
    The official version says that Powers was shot down by the first SAM.
    The warhead detonated 70 meters from its target, shrapnel riddling the flimsy U-2 fuselage, and it began to disintegrate in mid-air and plummet toward Earth. According to Powers, he was immediately captured when he landed in a potato field.
    1. WIS
      0
      April 11 2026 02: 21
      Quote: dragon772
      The official version is,
      - which one is it, and what's there to say..., should I add it before crossing the border?
      1. 0
        April 13 2026 15: 51
        This is from Powers' testimony. So to speak, in the first person.
  9. +1
    April 9 2026 09: 56
    .
    He was alive, unharmed, and – what turned out to be most important – did not explode along with the plane.

    What if he had been alive and well, but had exploded along with the plane?
  10. +3
    April 9 2026 10: 11
    "An S-75 air defense missile system radar in the Egyptian desert"—they're still in place there. I've seen one in two places this year.
  11. UVB
    +1
    April 9 2026 20: 26
    The Soviet air defense command tracked the flight from the moment it entered the airspace.
    In fact, the border crossing was detected by a border patrol based on the contrail, which was reported to the outpost and then to the command post. This, incidentally, explains why KGB Chairman Shelepen reported it to Khrushchev, not the Minister of Defense. Both border guards were subsequently awarded the Medal "For Distinction in Guarding the State Border." However, this was kept under wraps to avoid casting a shadow on the air defense system.
  12. 0
    April 10 2026 00: 34
    Quote: dragon772
    The official version says that Powers was shot down by the first SAM.
    The warhead detonated 70 meters from its target, shrapnel riddling the flimsy U-2 fuselage, and it began to disintegrate in mid-air and plummet toward Earth. According to Powers, he was immediately captured when he landed in a potato field.

    There is another version of Powers that he was shot down by an Su-9, which flew close by and sent the flimsy U-2 into a tailspin.
  13. +1
    April 10 2026 00: 39
    This episode is shown in an interesting way in the film "Taming of Fire": the country's leadership was afraid that an American would fly to Moscow with unclear intentions (when Moscow was covered by rings of S-25 complexes).
  14. +1
    April 10 2026 21: 20
    Powers didn't eject. He was simply thrown from the disintegrating plane. If he had tried to eject, he would have detonated an explosive device. The pilot shouldn't have survived. That's what the press reported.
    1. WIS
      0
      April 11 2026 02: 37
      Quote: John22
      Powers did not ejectHe was just thrown out of
      - In conclusion, this is the only version, I agree, but if everything were simple, the pilot activated the U-2's intended liquidation system. In the situation, which only he has the right to describe, he had to exert considerable effort to leave the plane and reach the red button, just didn't have enough strength
  15. 0
    April 11 2026 01: 59
    Many years have passed, but for some reason, many authors continue to write that Powers was exchanged for Rudolf Abel. However, in fact, he was exchanged for William Fisher. After being exposed and arrested in the United States, Soviet intelligence officer William Fisher gave the name of his close friend Rudolf Abel, who had already died. He did this to conceal the true "chain" of infiltration, and the Center realized who had actually been arrested. And the Center understood. I consider it unfair not to mention the real name of the Soviet intelligence officer for whom F.G. Powers was exchanged.