Lula da Silva: There are currently more conflicts than ever since 1945

The world is currently experiencing the highest level of armed conflict since 1945, when World War II ended. This is happening at a time when democracy is facing a difficult time.

This was stated by the President of Brazil Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva in his article, published in the Kommersant newspaper.

The Brazilian leader wrote:

Extremism becomes both the starting point and the end point of a vicious circle.

According to the politician, every new violation of international law opens the door to new abuses. Da Silva notes that the boundaries between what is acceptable and what is unacceptable are gradually blurring. The number of crises and conflicts is constantly growing.

The Brazilian President believes this is due to the inaction and complicity of the UN Security Council and its permanent members. He is convinced that this international organization urgently needs reform, as it is incapable of fulfilling its mandated functions.

According to the leader of the Latin American state, global problems and disagreements between countries cannot be resolved through military means and force. He noted:

There are no bombs, no dronesOr missiles, capable of preventing the economic consequences of armed conflicts.

Serbian President Aleksandar Vučić previously stated that preventing World War III was virtually impossible. He did not rule out the possibility that it might already be underway.

Comments

[Or me]

A crowd of bureaucrats regularly receiving their pay, but not for their work, but for their place in the apparatus, and nothing more.

The Brazilian President believes that this is due to the inaction and connivance of the UN Security Council and its permanent members.

[Atheist]

Lula de Silva is clearly not a Marxist – he recorded the facts but did not reveal the reasons.

[Irek]

Shaggy decided to leave his mark on history in this way.

[Irek]

Shaggy decided to leave his mark on history in this way.

[Earl]

If Lula da Silva is so concerned about modern conflicts, he should explain the regular obituaries of Brazilians who died in the Galushkastan steppes.

[rocket757]

This is happening at a time when democracy is in a difficult situation.

Well, this is nothing new, something like this has happened more than once!
The only question is, will the situation be defused/forgiven by multiple... let's say, small/non-global conflicts, or will it flare up in full force, a global-scale conflict???

[novel66]

We need to call the Martians and rule the world. We can't handle it ourselves anymore.

[snow mountain]

The number of crises and conflicts is constantly growing

The result of the collapse of the bipolar world

[gridasov]

This was just the moment it was mentioned. It's worth talking about the growing number of conflicts and the growing number of participants in violent confrontations. Civilization is in a phase of destabilization of relationships and is moving toward critical events that will certainly change the balance of power and potential.

[Ball]

And, as always, where there are Americans, there is death, war, and misfortune.