Come on, get in, here's some fresh "Boramay" for everyone!

22 959 50
Come on, get in, here's some fresh "Boramay" for everyone!

Long ago, in 2010, two countries, South Korea and Indonesia, agreed to collaborate on the aircraft of the future. Indonesia, however, dropped out of the project, but that's perfectly normal for them. The Koreans, however, persisted, and in 2022, the prototype took flight.

There were those who didn't believe the project would work. There were those who didn't care at all. And then there were those who watched developments very closely. The South Korean KF-21, like the Turkish KAAN, is very attractive to countries that lack the funds to buy European or American aircraft and the courage to acquire Russian ones.



It's no wonder Peru, after news of the KF-21's serial production launch, abruptly dropped the F-16 purchase from its agenda. "We were misunderstood, it was taken out of context, and anyway, we don't have the money"—that's the kind of vaguely worded explanation they gave.

Considering that Peru is an importer of armored vehicles from South Korea, it is very likely that the aircraft is of great interest to the military of that country.

And now, a moment of triumph: South Korea has unveiled the first production prototype of its own KF-21 fighter jet. This significant milestone in the program also demonstrates how quickly it is progressing: just over five years have passed since the unveiling of the fighter's first prototype. The development schedule is particularly impressive compared to other next-generation fighter programs, although Seoul has resorted to some contortions to meet such a tight deadline.

Naturally, everything was pompous in typical Korean style. What can I say, these guys know how to make a show out of anything.


The first production KF-21, also known as the Boramae, which means "hawk" in Korean, is a two-seat fighter jet unveiled at a ceremony at the headquarters of Korea Aerospace Industries (KAI) in Sacheon, southeast of Seoul.

South Korean President Lee Jae-myung himself conducted the show. He told guests that the fighter jet symbolized "South Korea's commitment to self-sufficiency in defense" and added that he intends to make the country one of the world's four leading defense powers.


South Korea finally got it weapons to protect the world with our own technologies - not only on land and at sea, but also in the air,
— Lee added.

Very... pompous. Especially about the world's fourth-largest power. Although in this world, anything like that happens. There's no doubt that South Korea is quickly becoming a major player in defense production, and this is increasingly reflected in its exports.

Besides the KF-21, Lee also took time to talk about the K9 self-propelled howitzer and the anti-aircraftrocket Cheongung complex of the country, which ensured profitable sales abroad. In the military sphere aviation The T-50/FA-50, an advanced jet trainer/light combat aircraft produced by the Korea Aerospace Corporation, has also proven itself to be a promising model for international sales.

Returning to the KF-21, it's worth noting that this fighter was developed to replace the F-4E Phantom IIs, now retired from service in South Korea, and the F-5E/F Tiger IIs still in service. Things aren't as bad in the South Korean Air Force as it might seem given the information about the F-4 and F-5, which are flying anachronisms. They have F-15s and F-16s, albeit not the newest variants, and 20 F-35s have been ordered, with the KF-21 now in line. It all makes perfect sense.

The program was officially launched in 2016, followed by the first prototype in April 2021 and the prototype's maiden flight in July 2022. In May 2023, the KF-21 was conditionally declared "combat-ready."


A pilot leaves the first KF-21 prototype at a rollout ceremony in Sacheon in April 2021.

A total of six prototypes were built and tested, two of which were two-seat versions of the aircraft.

According to previously announced plans, the Republic of Korea Air Force (ROKAF) is expected to receive 40 KF-21 aircraft by 2028, and its fleet is expected to number 120 units by 2032.

As for how South Korea reached this level so quickly, it must be acknowledged that the Koreans took an approach that is markedly different from other next-generation fighter programs.

The KF-21 was never marketed as a fifth-generation fighter with all the advanced features and capabilities that go with it. Instead, Seoul calls it a "4,5th-generation fighter," using terminology most often used to describe new or significantly upgraded fighters introduced in the 1990s.

Unlike a "true" fifth-generation fighter, the KF-21's airframe isn't primarily designed for stealth, and its sensor integration is significantly lower than, say, the F-35's. However, simpler doesn't necessarily mean worse, given the level of electronics development in South Korea.

For the Republic of Korea Air Force, a more sophisticated fighter isn't as relevant, as they're already receiving F-35As from the US. Of course, the Penguin has already received a lot of praise, especially for its electronic systems. So a simpler and more reliable aircraft would be welcome. Overall, the approach itself is surprisingly pragmatic: the Koreans haven't rushed to pursue generational numbers, building an aircraft capable of flying into space, and so on.


Republic of Korea Air Force F-35A fighter jet

At the same time, the KF-21 will boast numerous advanced features that would be suitable for a more ambitious project. These include an active electronically scanned array (AESA) radar and an infrared search and track (IRST) system. Its armament will also include MBDA Meteor ramjet-powered air-to-air missiles and, reportedly, locally produced long-range cruise missiles.


Concept art of a KF-21 armed with four semi-recessed Meteor air-to-air missiles, IRIS-T self-defense missiles, and a pair of JDAM guided bombs.

There is scope for further improvements that would bring the KF-21 closer to fifth-generation fighters in performance. The initial KF-21 carries weapons externally or semi-conformally, although the upcoming Block 3 version of the aircraft is planned to feature internal weapons bays.

Other advanced versions of the aircraft are also being considered, including a jamming platform, the concept of which was unveiled at the rollout ceremony.

Naturally, in the spirit of the times, South Korea is also implementing the concept of joint use of manned and unmanned aerial vehicles to further expand the capabilities of the KF-21.

Seoul expects its KF-21 fighters to work closely with its own unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), which will expand the capabilities of the manned fighter and maximize its combat weight. In this regard, the two-seat version of the aircraft should have a particular advantage, as the rear cockpit can accommodate a dedicated operator. dronesBut this is a separate concept that requires careful development.


A picture, of course, but pictures are where it all usually starts. A well-armed KF-21 (with an additional targeting system on an external sling) carries out a mission alongside three stealth fighters. drones

In terms of technical specifications, the KF-21 is no slouch either: according to some reports, its kinematic performance is superior to that of the F-16C. However, let's not get ahead of ourselves and wait for official releases.

So, what did the Koreans achieve? By avoiding some aspects of fighter development that traditionally require enormous time and resources, the Korea Institute of Aeronautics managed to outpace many potential competitors. At the same time, the five-year gap between the prototype and the first production model, compared to the 11-year gap between the first flight of the X-35 Joint Strike Fighter prototype and the first flight of the first production F-35A AF-6, is impressive.

In Russia, a full 10 years also passed between the first flight of the T-50 prototype in 2010 and the maiden flight of the first production Su-57 in 2020. So, the Koreans truly surprised many with the speed of their project development.

This doesn't mean the KF-21 was without its problems. In particular, a difficult relationship developed with Indonesia, which joined the program as a junior partner but then became embroiled in disputes over cost and work allocation, leading to the junior partner's eventual collapse.

And now, according to recent reports, Seoul is planning a deal to export 16 KF-21 fighters to Indonesia. President Lee also stated that South Korea will seek other partners to further enhance the competitiveness of its defense industry, possibly including the KF-21.


The KF-21 prototype makes a test flight during the Seoul International Air Force Exhibition.

South Korea is increasingly developing a wide range of domestically produced air-to-air weapons to avoid dependence on arms imports while simultaneously being able to offer them for export independently, without facing potential restrictions such as the US government's International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR).

Given South Korea's growing reputation as a supplier of high-tech weapons, the KF-21 could well become a highly attractive export product. Meanwhile, the fighter's serial production brings the first delivery to the Republic of Korea Air Force (ROKAF) closer, underscoring the ongoing modernization of the air force.

Exporting aircraft isn't an option for everyone. South Korea hasn't entered the international arms market as a supplier just yet. Moreover, it has transcended its status as a regional arms supplier. Previously, customers for armored vehicles included Thailand, Haiti, Malaysia, the Philippines, and Australia—those neighboring countries. Then came the turn of South American countries. Peru and Chile joined the ranks of South Korea's customers.

But the real breakthrough came when South Korea entered the market with its first aircraft, the T-50 "Golden Eagle." The "Golden Eagle" truly proved to be a golden eagle, and a significant number of countries purchased the aircraft, including Malaysia, the Philippines, Indonesia, Iraq, Poland, and Thailand. The combat-training aircraft proved popular, and several other countries are considering purchasing it.

The 114 aircraft sold for export could not help but inspire the Koreans to further their efforts to promote their aircraft on the international market. As the saying goes, appetite comes with eating, so the KF-21 could also have an interesting career ahead.
50 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. + 19
    31 March 2026 05: 16
    An objective article, without the usual mockery. The capabilities of the UK military-industrial complex are certainly astonishing, but the author didn't mention Poland—those are the ones who buy equipment with their mouths and other body parts. The engines weren't mentioned—are they Korean?
    1. + 10
      31 March 2026 06: 18
      The engine is a modification of the F404 GE-F414. Quite old and reliable.
      1. +6
        31 March 2026 07: 28
        The Koreans followed the Chinese path, taking a commercially available engine and assembling an aircraft with the latest electronics, resulting in a decent weapons carrier...
        1. +9
          31 March 2026 08: 25
          Quote: Civil
          Koreans have followed the path of the Chinese
          No, they're going their own way—the Korean way. Just like they entered the advanced, knowledge-intensive microchip industry in the 1990s, when Korea, not yet having advanced technology, was actively engaged in mass memory production. DRAM, without even delving into the details. And then everything went smoothly...
      2. + 14
        31 March 2026 08: 29
        Quote: Paul Zewike
        The engine is a modification of the F404 GE-F414. Quite old and reliable.
        Korean research centers have already completed testing of single-crystal turbine blades that can withstand temperatures approaching 1700°C, and the government has allocated more than $3 billion for the development of a domestic engine. Source: https://archive.ph/wKB1H
      3. -4
        31 March 2026 13: 08
        So the southerners don't have their own engine? Am I right in thinking they call it their own plane?
        1. +1
          31 March 2026 19: 27
          Not yet. Development is scheduled for the 30s. If it works out, they'll have their own plane. I don't wish them luck.
      4. +1
        31 March 2026 20: 16
        Quote: Paul Zewike
        The engine is a modification of the F404 GE-F414. Quite old and reliable.

        Actually, it is installed on the F-18 and Gripen.
        Very good
  2. +4
    31 March 2026 05: 35
    Quote: ASSAD1
    There is no mention of engines, are they Korean?
    There's no mention of avionics, life support systems, or emergency ejection systems. It seems like this machine is simply cobbled together from various components, just like the Turkish KAAN and the Swedish Saab.
    1. + 10
      31 March 2026 05: 42
      On the other hand, is that a bad thing? They'll gradually learn to use the necessary components. Unless, of course, the supplier sends them on an erotic journey.
      1. + 10
        31 March 2026 05: 54
        Quote: ASSAD1
        Unless, of course, the supplier sends you on an erotic journey.

        The prospective buyers are US allies and will never be able to afford the F-35, much less sell it to them. So the Koreans will find their niche, which will bring them good profits and the opportunity to continue working in this field.
        1. +6
          31 March 2026 08: 32
          Quote: Puncher
          So the Koreans will occupy their niche
          They will occupy the niche that the Americans are now leaving. The niche of fourth-generation aircraft. (or 4.5) generations...
          1. +4
            31 March 2026 09: 26
            They will fill the niche that the Americans are currently leaving—the niche of fourth-generation (or 4.5-generation) aircraft...

            Well, yes, unless the Americans decide they're sorry to give up this market. They could even cut off supplies of engines, avionics, and other things. Trump is no stranger to lashing out with the tariff bludgeon.
            1. +1
              31 March 2026 11: 53
              I think they'll come to a deal. Koreans are surprisingly flexible.
              It worked with the armored vehicles, didn't it?
              1. +1
                31 March 2026 13: 05
                Those were good, prosperous times. There was enough for everyone. Now everything could change.
      2. -3
        31 March 2026 06: 02
        It's not that it's bad, it's called critical dependency: a lot of countries have the ability to put your Air Force in a bind simply by cutting off the supply of components.
    2. +7
      31 March 2026 08: 26
      This is a more independent project. It's certainly not inferior to Grippen.
      And in electronics, UK is ahead of the rest of the world.
      1. +3
        31 March 2026 13: 00
        It's definitely not inferior to Grippen.
        Grippen has already produced several generations, and all the teething troubles have been fixed. The Korean still has a long way to go. But the most important thing is that the foundation has been laid for his own fighter.
        1. 0
          31 March 2026 17: 34
          But you will notice the mature design, which clearly attracted Americans.
  3. +3
    31 March 2026 05: 50
    Quote: ASSAD1
    On the other hand, is it bad?
    No, it's good for Korea. Our aviation industry developed in exactly the same way in the 20s and 30s. But a future competitor could start to seriously irritate us later. wink
  4. +9
    31 March 2026 05: 54
    It's written clearly, without unnecessary fluff... good
    Everything is fine, everything is correct, but here's why:
    114 aircraft sold for export could not help but inspire the Koreans to further efforts to promote their aircraft on the foreign market.

    And Russians are not at all inspired by the Second World War, which has been going on for five years, nor by the current situation around the borders with NATO, nor by the need to be ready, while all deadlines for the commissioning of military equipment and weapons are either invariably pushed back, or cancelled due to lack of prospects, or are hampered by a lack of funds? belay
    1. +7
      31 March 2026 07: 28
      Quote: yuriy55
      All deadlines for the commissioning of military equipment and weapons are either invariably pushed back, or cancelled due to lack of prospects, or are hindered by a lack of funds?

      Apparently, the incentives are different. Some want to make their country strong, while others want to line their own pockets.
    2. 0
      31 March 2026 08: 10
      Russians are encouraged by the launch of the first batch of Rassvet satellites, marking the beginning of the rollout of global low-orbit satellite communications. Furthermore, the news from the civil aviation industry is encouraging – the testing of civilian airliners following the forced import substitution of foreign components. This is a titanic undertaking, given the state of the Russian aviation industry and the less-than-effective management apparatus.
      1. +4
        31 March 2026 08: 52
        Quote: NordOst16
        A titanic task, given the state of the Russian aviation industry and the less than effective work of the administrative apparatus.

        Sisyphus also did a titanic job...

        We still use commands in the form of imperative verbs rather than quantities (numbers, units of measurement) to communicate information.
        We need attack drones! How many exactly and what models?
        Drone operators needed! Where can we train them, what is the required age, and what is the demand?
        Do we need to secure tankers? How many ships, from which fleet?

        I remember in the Michurin orchards (early 60s), some gardeners had apple trees with huge (and beautiful) apples growing on their plots. But we didn't go after them because one of our friends had experienced getting hit with rock salt, and we knew that stealing was punishable by law, regardless of the thief's age...
        1. -1
          31 March 2026 16: 30
          Quote: yuriy55
          Sisyphus also did a titanic job...

          Of course, you don't have to try like Manilov, but then you certainly won't be able to build a bridge over a stream or dig a hidden tunnel somewhere.

          Quote: yuriy55
          We still use commands in the form of imperative verbs rather than quantities (numbers, units of measurement) to communicate information.

          Well, what can you do? Given the acute shortage of competent personnel and the dysfunctional system of public administration, even such attempts are considered a serious undertaking.

          Quote: yuriy55
          and we knew that theft is punishable regardless of the age of the thief...

          1) If boys walked around with guns, sooner or later some compromise would be reached regarding the number of apples that could be picked.
          2) but, fortunately, nowadays you can go to the store and buy big sweet apples without the risk of getting a salt charge.
          1. 0
            31 March 2026 20: 23
            Quote: NordOst16
            Of course, you don’t have to try like Manilov,

            For you, even the labor of Sisypheus counts as an attempt? But this is the same old Manilovism, only viewed from the side. laughing
            1. 0
              31 March 2026 23: 25
              Between doing nothing and doing something, please listen, it’s better to choose the latter.
      2. +1
        April 1 2026 00: 57
        Pants are full of joy!!!!!
        Yeah, how about we start churning out planes by the hundreds...
        And who will service them???
        Where do you find engineers to service aircraft that haven't been produced yet???
        They plan to produce 1000 sides by 30.
        Where will the technical staff come from? They need to be trained. And to train them, educational institutions need equipment.
        A couple of years ago, I was talking to the head of a department at an aviation institute—the equipment was a complete disaster. There was some, but it was all old.
        There is nothing at all about the PD-14, there is nothing about the SSZh-100 engines (and it has been flying for many years).
        Everything is as usual with us - there is a product, but no service!!!
        We'll build a nuclear cruiser - but alas, there won't be a pier for it.
    3. +3
      31 March 2026 12: 13
      How can the SVO be inspired? When, for example, Ukrainian Armed Forces equipment was (is?) running on Russian diesel fuel, all these shady deals, weapons (drones) supplies at God knows what prices (and anyone who pries into the prices gets blown up), and lies, lies, lies...
  5. -5
    31 March 2026 07: 34
    The only thing I don't understand is, if they're so keen on stealth, then why bother making such a non-aerodynamic shape (like a penguin)? It could have been more interesting.
    1. +4
      31 March 2026 08: 35
      Quote: novel xnumx
      The only thing that's not clear is, if they're already talking about stealth, then why the hell make such a non-aerodynamic shape (like a penguin)?
      For greater stealth, they plan to create an internal compartment. But that's not all there is to it...
    2. +8
      31 March 2026 09: 01
      if they've already spat on stealth

      Who told you they were just spitting? They've laid the groundwork for the future and reduced their signature as much as possible without complex technology. Next, for example, they'll place weapons in compartments, further reducing signature, gradually increasing it from 4,5 to 5. A reasonable approach. They have the F-35, so they can now bring theirs up at their own pace.
      1. 0
        31 March 2026 09: 07
        Or they might decide that since there is a 35th, there is no need to do anything and it will just be a poorly flying plane.
      2. +2
        31 March 2026 20: 26
        Quote from solar
        Who told you that they spat saliva?

        I would like to add that “invisibility” is not the same as virginity, which is either there or not.
        This is the probability of being hit by a missile - it could be 0,91, but has been reduced to 0,85. Which is already very good.
        Because of these 0,9 probabilities, it is necessary to fire two expensive missiles.
        1. +3
          31 March 2026 21: 02
          Moreover, this is not just the probability of defeat, but also detection and identification ranges, the ability to release the lock-on and other very pleasant perks for air operations. It is no coincidence that the Americans diligently increased this very stealth on all aircraft from fighters to strategic ones, and judging by Iran, it worked quite well.
  6. -1
    31 March 2026 07: 39
    A two-seat fighter where, judging by the photo, the pilots sit side by side, like on our Su-34? What an original solution! Again, judging by the photo, the single-seat version's second pilot seat has simply been removed, leaving the remaining pilot sitting off to the side. And where's the second cockpit for the unmanned systems operator? The article can be summed up in one sentence: "They can do it! And what do we have?" and nothing more.
  7. -1
    31 March 2026 09: 51
    In May 2023, the KF-21 was conditionally declared "combat ready."

    If only the military actions would have declared him fit for service. lol
  8. +1
    31 March 2026 09: 57
    A question about the engines and weapons. How much of them are Korean?
  9. +4
    31 March 2026 12: 13
    We roll out Zhiguli cars with such fanfare
  10. +1
    31 March 2026 12: 41
    An interesting concept, similar to the F-35, but already inconspicuous. What about the armament, is it on par with the F-35?
  11. +1
    31 March 2026 12: 59
    The Koreans have created a robust attack aircraft. If they can ramp up production to 50 aircraft per year, they'll be able to compete strongly with us and the Chinese, especially in the Southeast Asian and Oceanian markets, and in South America. I think the Americans will eventually pressure local politicians into buying their weapons.
    1. +1
      31 March 2026 13: 08
      will be able to provide strong competition to us and the Chinese, especially in the markets of Southeast Asia and Oceania, in South America

      I think a single-engine would be more relevant there.
  12. +1
    31 March 2026 13: 31
    A kind of Korean import substitution, we can take it for granted, they're developing. The Americans don't mind, they're allies.
  13. +1
    31 March 2026 15: 07
    North Korea wouldn't mind acquiring a production line for a modern fighter jet, either. And I don't understand why they'd exchange, for example, documentation for the MIG-35 or another "dead" project for a cannon-guided and short-range missile air defense system (of which North Korea has a decent number), along with trained crews who could beef up the air defense of strategic facilities, factories, refineries, ports—everything that's currently under attack. Even documentation for the Mi-24 would be very tempting for them.
    1. 0
      April 2 2026 11: 45
      Unfortunately, if AvtoVAZ is given the documentation for a BMW, a miracle won't happen...
      In addition to documentation, we also need high-quality component suppliers, highly qualified personnel, equipment, and much more.
      1. 0
        April 3 2026 14: 59
        Well, North Korea, having received the Mi-2 documentation, mastered its production, and that was 30 years ago. Today, it's a sufficiently advanced country to master the production of the Mi-24 as well.
        1. 0
          April 3 2026 17: 42
          Turboshaft engines producing 2000+ hp are among the most complex technologies in aircraft manufacturing. They require single-crystal turbine blades, heat-resistant alloys, and precision machining. Only the United States, Russia, France, and China (and China, only relatively recently) are able to produce such engines entirely independently.
          1. 0
            April 4 2026 14: 16
            I don't think it's much more technologically advanced than an ICBM with a range of 15,000 km and a thrust of 2500 kilonewtons. If they've created an engine capable of operating under such a colossal load, then they can also cobble together an engine for the Mi-24 based on the designs. I believe in the DPRK.
  14. 0
    31 March 2026 21: 51
    Another competitor to our MiG-35 and Su-35 and American fighter jets on the international market.
  15. 0
    April 8 2026 10: 05
    Koreans are workaholics. I remember in the 90s everyone laughed at their auto industry and electronics. The same will happen with aircraft and other military equipment. Well, as they say, he who laughs last, laughs best!