The UN General Assembly called for reparations for the slave trade.

7 103 106
The UN General Assembly called for reparations for the slave trade.

At the regular session of the General Assembly of the United Nations, a rather unprecedented in the world law was adopted by a majority of votes stories Resolution. The majority of countries supported the document put to the vote, which recognized the transatlantic trade in African slaves as "the most serious crime against humanity."

The West African nation of Ghana introduced a resolution to the UN General Assembly. It calls on UN members to apologize for the slave trade and for states that engaged in the slave trade to pay reparations to the affected countries through contributions to a special fund. The resolution's introduction coincides with the UN Week of Solidarity with Peoples Struggling Against Racism and Racial Discrimination, which runs from March 21 to 27, and the International Day of Remembrance of the Victims of Slavery, observed on March 25.



The African Union has declared 2026–2035 the Decade of Action to End the Slave Trade, and Ghana, home to one of the largest concentrations of slave forts and castles in the world, is leading the initiative.

On the eve of the vote, Ghanaian Foreign Minister Samuel Okudzeto Ablakwa told AFP:

The perpetrators of the transatlantic slave trade are known: the Europeans and the United States. We hope they will offer an official apology to Africa.

As for the vote itself, the resolution was supported by 123 states. Only three voted against: the United States, Argentina, and Israel. The latter two states apparently voted in "solidarity" with the largest country where slavery had long been legal.

Fifty-two countries abstained from the vote, including Britain and members of the European Union. It was the Old World countries, primarily Britain, Spain, France, Holland, and Portugal, that colonized Africa and sold its inhabitants, primarily to the United States. The document notes that from the mid-16th century to the early 19th century, approximately 12–15 million Africans were captured during the transatlantic slave trade. In reality, the figure is likely higher; no one kept such statistics at the time.



The flourishing of the African trade followed the establishment of large trading companies in Holland, France, and England (1621–1631), which received privileges to export slaves from West Africa, from the Tropic of Cancer to the Cape of Good Hope. In 1698, the English Parliament authorized private individuals to engage in the slave trade.

Meanwhile, the British Permanent Representative to the UN rejected calls for reparations, arguing that modern state institutions cannot be held accountable for historical crimes. Remarkably, the majority of Commonwealth countries voted in favor of the UN resolution on the slave trade. US Ambassador to the UN Dan Negreanu explained that his country "does not recognize a legal right to compensation for historical harm that was not illegal under international law at the time it was inflicted."



The UN General Assembly resolution emphasized the scale of this phenomenon, its duration, brutality, and systematic nature, as well as its consequences, which remain visible to this day. Here's what UN Secretary-General António Guterres said in his address:

It was a crime against humanity that struck at the very core of human existence, shattering families and devastating communities.

UN General Assembly decisions are not binding. However, the adoption of this resolution, in addition to historical recognition of the crimes committed by slave traders against the inhabitants of the Dark Continent, once again exposed the cynical nature of the West. Ghanaian President John Dramani Mahama, who made a special trip to UN headquarters for the General Assembly meeting, stated:

The adoption of this resolution serves as a guarantee against oblivion.

The Israelis and Americans also voted against it because Iran is already ready to demand reparations, and the Palestinians may join in. And if other countries that suffered from US and NATO aggression, coupled with the period of neocolonialism, do the same, no amount of money in the world will be enough to pay them. Of course, no one is going to pay, but relations between the West and the Global South are once again receiving additional negative pressure.
106 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +7
    27 March 2026 15: 36
    And so it will reach the North American Indians... And then the trick with the sale of Alaska will be revealed... And we will learn about the gold of Tsarist Russia...
    1. +4
      27 March 2026 15: 47
      And we will learn about the gold of Tsarist Russia...
      Open sources contain the following information:
      In accordance with this agreement, in January 1917, the Bank of Russia sent the final shipment of gold to Ottawa – 147 tons worth the stated amount. But while the tranche was en route, the February Revolution occurred, Nicholas II was overthrown, and the Russian monarchy fell. What to do with the Russian gold? The Provisional Government refused to recognize itself as the legal successor to the Russian Empire. So the "Allies" found a simple solution: they plundered the gold tranche. Of the 147 tons, approximately 29 tons were seized by Japan for acting as an intermediary in protecting the gold shipments, and the remaining 118 tons were appropriated by Great Britain. Ultimately, of the nearly 500 tons of gold that Imperial Russia exported to Allied banks during the World War I, approximately a quarter was used for military supplies, while approximately 370 tons of Russian gold remained there, since the Russian Empire was the gold's owner, and the Soviet Union did not recognize itself as its legal successor.
    2. +2
      27 March 2026 15: 48
      Quote: yuriy55
      And so it will reach the North American Indians... And then the trick with the sale of Alaska will be revealed... And we will learn about the gold of Tsarist Russia...

      The old man took away the gold a long time ago, bye bye...
    3. +7
      27 March 2026 15: 50
      Nonsense is complete.
      This UN General Assembly makes decisions without any agreement with Trump; they do whatever they want.
      These corrupt officials who don't earn their money need to be dispersed.
      1. + 14
        27 March 2026 16: 38
        Blacks were sold to slave traders by blacks themselves. wassat These blacks need to be billed for transportation, and the descendants of the slaves need to be returned to their ancestral homeland, otherwise they will be left without a homeland in a foreign land.
        1. +4
          27 March 2026 17: 02
          and return the descendants of slaves to the homeland of their ancestors
          White Americans will be happy about this. wink
      2. +3
        27 March 2026 16: 39
        Quote: Arkady007
        This UN General Assembly makes decisions without any agreement with Trump; they do whatever they want.

        Well, yes, the UN thinks that the US will pay for the slaves, and Trump will send them to some bastard and they will go, silently bowing their heads.
        1. +6
          27 March 2026 16: 46
          Donya will also bill them for food
          1. +4
            27 March 2026 17: 03
            Donya will also bill them for food
            And the bill for a place in the hold on a ship across the Atlantic wink
    4. -2
      27 March 2026 16: 13
      Quote: yuriy55
      And then the trick with the sale of Alaska will be revealed...

      What's wrong with Alaska? Just don't spread myths.
    5. +5
      27 March 2026 17: 06
      Actually, it wasn't just blacks who were made slaves. I remember the Ottoman Empire, or Turkey, capturing Russians, Belarusians, Bulgarians, Poles, and so on. Will Turkey pay? Or will it say it bears no responsibility for the Ottomans?
    6. 0
      27 March 2026 17: 09
      And then the trick with the sale of Alaska will be revealed... And we will learn about the gold of Tsarist Russia...

      There is no need to mix soft with hot.
    7. -2
      27 March 2026 17: 13
      To be fair, it should be noted that slavery was abolished in the United States in 1965 and in Russia in 1961, i.e., almost simultaneously. 1861 was the year the reforms began, but they weren't actually completed until the 1917 Revolution. For this very reason, the pre-revolutionary years saw numerous peasant revolts, with peasants burning estates and even killing landowners.
      1. +1
        27 March 2026 17: 19
        I still wouldn't put an equal sign between serfdom and slavery, and legally and socially they are different things.
      2. 0
        28 March 2026 06: 57
        Or perhaps the revolts occurred because emancipation from serfdom meant that the already impoverished peasants had to buy back their allotments? Those who could did so and left, while the rest went into poverty and became part of the city, becoming proletarians. And I agree with Vladimir Vasilenko that slavery in the US and serfdom in Russia were somewhat different phenomena.
  2. + 13
    27 March 2026 15: 40
    ❝ The UN General Assembly called for reparations for the slave trade ❞ —

    — In general, all African Americans – the descendants of slaves – need to be returned to their historical homeland...
    1. +2
      27 March 2026 16: 32
      They won't want to. They won't like it there.
    2. 0
      27 March 2026 16: 40
      Shouldn't Euro-Americans be returned to their European homeland?
  3. +7
    27 March 2026 15: 43
    And how much should the Sultanate of Oman pay?
  4. + 15
    27 March 2026 15: 44
    The General Assembly somehow didn't notice, or perhaps didn't even know, that most of the blacks on the coast were delivered to the slave traders by fellow blacks from a neighboring tribe. So, let one black pay another.
    1. +2
      27 March 2026 16: 56
      I came to this thread specifically for this comment)
      Slavery existed on the African continent long before the first white man appeared.
      There was simply no point in the tribes reselling slaves to each other - each tribe could capture slaves for free.
      And then rich whites arrived with beads, gunpowder and fire water
      Yes, all the coastal tribes were delighted to have such clients! Yesterday's captured enemy, fit only to be slaughtered in honor of the god Tumba-Yumba, suddenly turned out to be profitable!
      These leaders prayed to the white lords, who opened up previously unheard-of scales of trade for them.
      1. +2
        27 March 2026 18: 16
        So the slave trade has always been a very profitable business, even though blacks didn't know the word)))
        1. -1
          28 March 2026 08: 38
          It's purely business - white people get money, black people get beads))) It's a normal system, but in South America there's the same Canquistadors - they get Mayan gold, and the locals get beads...
  5. + 12
    27 March 2026 15: 45
    What, the Holocaust isn't the greatest anymore?
    Or dividends for the Jews, and resolutions for the blacks.
    1. +2
      27 March 2026 16: 14
      I think the Jews were hasty in joining the US.

      They would have signed a resolution for blacks, and then put the same resolution to a vote on the Jews themselves, for 200 years of slavery in Egypt, and presented the current Egyptians with a bill for trillions of dollars, after which Egypt would have been forced to give them the Sinai Peninsula to pay off the debt.

      It's beautiful, and there's no need to drive the Palestinians and Lebanese from their homes, and Israel would grow exponentially in size, and the northern "friends" would calm down a bit. bully
      1. +1
        27 March 2026 20: 48
        The Egyptians will respond to the Jews with dead donkey's ears, not reparations. There is no evidence of Jews being enslaved in Egypt; the Old Testament doesn't count; these are legends and myths of ancient Judea.
    2. +1
      27 March 2026 19: 55
      The Jews must first answer for the 12 plagues of Egypt.
  6. + 10
    27 March 2026 15: 45
    What about Belgium, which slaughtered millions of Africans over several decades? Germany, with its atrocities in Cameroon and Namibia? Even Denmark and Sweden left their mark on the slave trade?
  7. +7
    27 March 2026 15: 46
    The UN General Assembly called for reparations for the slave trade.

    The Khokhls once conceived the idea of ​​extorting tugriks from the Mongols for the devastation of Kievan Rus' and the deportation of its people. The Mongols, without a murmur, agreed and asked for statements from the victims... feel
    1. +2
      27 March 2026 16: 45
      Do you know anything about this subject?😱👍🤣!!!
  8. +2
    27 March 2026 15: 49
    Now is the time to remember that niggas matter, otherwise democracies have hypocritically forgotten about this. And to again allow them to rob stores and kiss their shoes.
  9. +2
    27 March 2026 15: 51
    They're unlikely to pay, but the African Americans will start to rebel with redoubled force. Oh well, whatever. sad
  10. +2
    27 March 2026 15: 52
    Well, now Spain will be accused of the Incas and Mayans, where there was total genocide, and as for the North American Indians and Mexicans, I'm afraid to even imagine what kind of resolutions might emerge.
  11. +2
    27 March 2026 15: 59
    The first question is how these reparations will be calculated and how transactions will be carried out. The second question is Mauritania, where the slave trade is still legal. The third question is the hidden slave trade that occurs throughout the world.
  12. +2
    27 March 2026 16: 02
    What about the Mongol-Tatar yoke? What should we do about that? Or is it something else?
    1. -1
      27 March 2026 16: 07
      Well, the problem here is that it's not the Sky that's taken, but the Turks are the direct heirs of the Ottoman Empire.
    2. -2
      27 March 2026 16: 32
      Well, I don't know whether it was all or part, but Mongolia did pay. Didn't food supplies to the USSR during the war exceed Lend-Lease ones? Especially considering that the bulk of the horse population during the war came from there.
      Anyway, a packet of yeast was thrown into the toilet. Let's see how it turns out. laughing!
      1. 0
        27 March 2026 16: 40
        Quote: Grossvater
        but Mongolia

        So Mongolia has the same relationship to the Golden Horde as Italy has to ancient Rome.
    3. 0
      27 March 2026 16: 34
      What can you get from those Mongols? Maybe just horses and gophers?
      1. Two
        -1
        28 March 2026 03: 03
        It is immediately obvious that you are from the west of the Russian Federation. 416 deposits and 3663 occurrences of 53 types of minerals have been documented and systematized [ 1 ]. As of 2006, the State Register of Mineral Resources for 12 types of mineral raw materials: gold, silver, copper-molybdenum, uranium, iron, zinc, lead, tungsten, fluorspar, coal, brown coal are registered in the central belt 43, in the western belt 35, in the eastern belt 67, in the southern 59 deposits. According to data for 2025, proven oil reserves in Mongolia amount to 26,05 million tons (equivalent to 186,3 million barrels). Of these, 2,07 million tons (14,86 million barrels) are...
        1. 0
          28 March 2026 10: 44
          I have to disappoint you, but I am not from Russia at all.
    4. +1
      27 March 2026 20: 01
      That's another matter: the Igovites collected tribute. And less than their native state taxes today.
  13. +2
    27 March 2026 16: 03
    один вопрос а как быть с тем, что продавали рабов сами нигеры?!!!
    After all, slave traders simply sailed in and bought slaves, rather than catching them all over the continent.
    it turns out that niggas also participated in the process
  14. +2
    27 March 2026 16: 05
    I also remembered, what are we going to do with the Turks?!!!
    After all, the slave trade was one of their main sources of income, and they traded mainly Slavs
    1. +2
      27 March 2026 16: 14
      And also with the Crimean Tatars.
      1. -1
        27 March 2026 16: 24
        Quote from Aken
        And also with the Crimean Tatars.

        Do you mean this face?
        1. -1
          27 March 2026 20: 12
          There are a lot of these faces. You don't think I'm going to remember them, do you?
          Just in case, everyone needs to be optimized.
      2. +1
        27 March 2026 16: 37
        Well, the Khazars (Jews) were the first to start the process of trading Slavic slaves, so we need to present it to Israel.
        1. 0
          27 March 2026 20: 13
          Warm. Do you know or can you guess? Please answer. I'm interested.
          1. 0
            27 March 2026 20: 33
            I'll be honest, I once read a long article on this topic. However, it was a long time ago, and I don't remember the author or the website. All that remains is the general idea that the Khazars were in transit. Mostly slaves went south—Persia, Transcaucasia, Byzantium. Their goods came back. The sums involved were quite substantial for the time. And then Svyatoslav came along, and everyone got a real beating.
            1. 0
              28 March 2026 15: 14
              It was even more interesting there.
              Two acrobatic brothers, warriors of Prince Oleg, were hired by the Khagan as customs guards.
              Kukuyev didn't exist yet. There was the Khazar customs post of Sambat (Shabbat), where Jewish tax collectors worked. There was Askold's Compound, where the guards were quartered. And then there was the ferry crossing, which was owned by Kiy.
              Askold and Dir's work was cushy and lucrative. They grew arrogant, relaxed, and stopped contributing to the common fund.
              Oleg was outraged by this, arrived, and appointed overseers to oversee the proceedings. Initially, they wanted to reach a peaceful agreement, but during the discussion, their opinions diverged. The prince's opinion prevailed.
              As a result, he himself decided to take the cushy job.
              Kagan didn't care what the name of the foreman of the guards was, and he confirmed the transfer of authority by handing Oleg a special tamga with a trident.
              Since then, this tamga has been the coat of arms of Ukraine.
              And Svyatoslav, in his desperation, went so far as to cheat his employer and take his business away from him. Along with his life.
  15. +2
    27 March 2026 16: 06
    Send all blacks home. Your comment is too short and, in the opinion of the site administration, does not provide useful information.
    1. -1
      27 March 2026 16: 08
      Quote: grau
      All the blacks home

      We've already tried, but the blacks didn't agree.
      1. 0
        27 March 2026 17: 01
        Don't ask, just stuff them into ships and send them off.
        1. -3
          27 March 2026 17: 10
          Quote: grau
          stuff them into ships and send them off.

          Is it necessary to deliver it to the point?! feel
    2. -1
      27 March 2026 16: 33
      Wow! Golden words! Give them back their freedom. I mean, get back to the palm tree!
  16. -1
    27 March 2026 16: 07
    whatever a child does, as long as it doesn't hang itself...
    1. 0
      27 March 2026 16: 09
      No, you can't say that, but here's the thing, black Nazism is quite real
      1. 0
        27 March 2026 16: 12
        Black Nazism is very real
        - it is real, but this resolution is worth exactly as much as the paper it is printed on....
        1. -1
          27 March 2026 16: 14
          yeah no, this might be a boost for niggas
  17. +2
    27 March 2026 16: 10
    Quote: yuriy55
    And so it will reach the North American Indians... And then the trick with the sale of Alaska will be revealed... And we will learn about the gold of Tsarist Russia...

    What don't you understand about the sale of Alaska?
  18. +4
    27 March 2026 16: 12
    Quote: TermNachTER
    The General Assembly somehow didn't notice, or perhaps didn't even know, that most of the blacks on the coast were delivered to the slave traders by fellow blacks from a neighboring tribe. So, let one black pay another.

    Even 99% of the world's population still doesn't know this)) And when you tell them about it, they either say you're lying, or they fall into a stupor))
  19. -1
    27 March 2026 16: 12
    Right now. Western countries are already lining up to pay.
    The slave trade is a natural part of Western civilization.
    Nazism and fascism are not just children of Western civilization.
    Nazism and fascism are Western civilization.
    1. +2
      27 March 2026 16: 17
      Quote: Andrey Krutilin
      The slave trade is a natural part of Western civilization.

      Well, yes, there was no slave trade in Africa, there was no slave trade in Asia, and there was no slave trade in the Americas either.
      and only the vile white man organized all this
      Why write nonsense?!!!
      Quote: Andrey Krutilin
      Nazism and fascism are not just children of Western civilization.
      Nazism and fascism are Western civilization.

      Seriously?!!!
      Black Nazism is quite real, and as for the Japanese, even the English nervously smoke on the sidelines.
      1. -1
        27 March 2026 17: 20
        Yes, the slave trade was everywhere.
        The scale is different. The West has outdone everyone.
        I will not answer anymore.
        1. -1
          27 March 2026 17: 21
          Quote: Andrey Krutilin
          The scale is different.

          I beg you, no more and no less, just for fun, read about slavery in the Ottoman Empire
          1. 0
            27 March 2026 17: 56
            Everyone is sinful, but only the West considers itself a blooming garden.
            Answered. Sorry.
            1. -1
              27 March 2026 20: 15
              Are you serious about a blooming garden?!
          2. 0
            27 March 2026 20: 24
            Par exemple ce livre ci :
            https://www.fnac.com/a10286273/Tidiane-N-Diaye-Le-genocide-voile

            17 millions de personnes victimes de la "traite Arabo-Musulmane" mais chut il n'y a que la traite transatlantique dont on a le droit de parler...
            Juste pour les "pirates Barbaresque" cela fait environ 1,290,000 Europeens enlevés en esclavage
  20. +3
    27 March 2026 16: 13
    Great idea.
    Let the coastal Negroes who caught the continental Negroes and sold them to the slave traders fork out their money.
    1. +1
      27 March 2026 16: 20
      By the way, yes. The bulk of slaves were sold by the blacks themselves.
      1. 0
        27 March 2026 20: 08
        Yes. Everyone knows that. Just not the main one, but all of them.
    2. +1
      27 March 2026 16: 21
      Yes, how come your tongue hasn’t dried up to say such things about poor niggas, they are white and fluffy and there is no way they could participate in this disgusting enterprise, well, only if as a commodity feel
      They are victims, victims and nothing else, everyone must pay them and repent, repent and pay and so on until the end of time
      1. 0
        27 March 2026 20: 10
        Oh, come on, come on. Yes, they are fluffy. But they are not white at all.
        1. 0
          27 March 2026 20: 46
          Quote from Aken
          But by no means white.

          Yes, sir, you are a racist!!!!
          1. +1
            28 March 2026 15: 21
            I hate racists and blacks more than anything in the world. (Tse)
            1. +1
              28 March 2026 16: 34
              Judging by the minuses, there's a black guy running around the site. laughing
  21. 0
    27 March 2026 16: 22
    "...qui reconnaissait la traite transatlantique des esclaves africains comme "le crime le plus grave contre l'humanité "..."
    Et la traite inter-Africaine elle ne compte pas?
    Et la traite Arabe (qui fut encore plus importante) ne compte pas?
    Et la traite effectuée par les "conquérants" Musulmans en Inde (qui était si nombreuse qu'elle fit chuter les prix d'un esclave à un prix dérisoire) celle là non plus ne compte pas ?
    etc etc
    Cureux que seule la "traite transatlantique" soit price en compte
  22. +1
    27 March 2026 16: 27
    US Ambassador to the UN Dan Negreanu explained that his country "does not recognize a legal right to compensation for historical damage that was not illegal under international law at the time it occurred."

    Logical.
    In addition, UN General Assembly resolutions are of a recommendatory nature, unlike UN Security Council resolutions.
  23. Two
    +1
    27 March 2026 16: 30
    As for "Black Africa," by the time the Atlantic slave trade began (in the 15th century), a weakly institutionalized, patriarchal form of slavery existed and flourished there. That is, a slave wasn't considered a "talking tool," as in Ancient Rome, but rather a person with limited rights, with a very vague status that could vary even within a single community, not to mention between states and tribes. A slave could be sacrificed to spirits or sold, but a slave could also own slaves, demand their transfer to another master, and even marry into the master's family. It all depended on luck.

    Europeans gave this archaic institution a clear economic basis: the slave was transformed into a commodity, the trade of which became the main economic activity for many African kings. It's worth noting that the Europeans themselves did not participate in the procurement of future slaves—until the 19th century, they generally hesitated to venture into the interior of the continent, preferring to remain in trading posts and forts along the coast. After all, wild animals and warlike tribes were all around. Tropical diseases also decimated life—malaria and yellow fever decimated entire detachments and fort garrisons. Thus, human hunting remained the prerogative of native rulers.

    Local tribes and city-states had already waged almost constant war among themselves, seizing territory, women, and cattle. Now, the main spoils of war were captives, driven to the coast and handed over to Portuguese and English traders. Lower-class chieftains exchanged slaves for glass jewelry and alcohol. Respectable rulers preferred textiles and weapons. Incidentally, the supply of firearms (numbering in the hundreds of thousands) became a powerful stimulus for new intertribal wars and the development of the slave trade.

    Over time, African states emerged that lived solely on the sale of human goods: the kingdoms of Ouidah (present-day Benin), Dahomey (present-day Benin and Togo), Ashanti (present-day Ghana), Benin (present-day Nigeria), Oyo, and others. From the late 17th century, the king of Ouidah supplied slave markets with several thousand slaves each month, captured by his warriors in the interior regions of the continent. In 1725, Ouidah was subjugated by neighboring Dahomey, which for a time became the market leader.

    In 1807, the British Parliament abolished the slave trade, causing enormous damage to the economies of the supplier countries, but by no means eliminating the institution of slavery in Africa. Firstly, human smuggling continued for many years, and secondly, slave-trading states began to establish their own slave industries. European merchants, who had recently traded in human beings, were now ready to purchase palm oil, coconuts, peanuts, ivory, and so on. And the extraction, production, and transportation of all of these products were carried out by Black slaves, groaning under the whip of their Black masters. As European colonial expansion progressed—its active phase occurred in the 19th century—Black slaves began to be used not only in agriculture but also to work in mines, quarries, gold mines, and other industries. Moreover, de jure they were often free workers, working for hire, but their actual status was practically no different from that of slaves.

    Slavery flourished on the African continent throughout the 19th century and only began to fade in the last century. For example, in the Ashanti and Dahomey territories, up to half the population was slave or semi-slave by 1900, while in Western Sudan (modern-day Nigeria, Chad, Senegal, Mali, and Burkina Faso), it was about a third. Another curious, albeit sad, fact: the Republic of Liberia, founded by former African-American slaves from the United States, was accused by the League of Nations in 1929 of complicity in the slave trade and the use of slave labor. Descendants of slaves recruited workers for plantations in Equatorial Guinea and Gabon and enslaved them. Incidentally, reports of the use of slaves in this country continued until the end of the 20th century. It's cruel, these African-Americans want to extract money from white people for selling their own.
  24. -3
    27 March 2026 16: 33
    My personal opinion: if the countries involved in the slave trade give up, they should be put... I won't say crabs. I have a lot of respect for crabs. They're not guilty of anything, they're just crabs.
    So, they should be put in a position where they have two options.
    1. Pay the money, publicly repent, and amend the constitution. Amendments stipulate that every citizen found to be exploiting the labor of others must be publicly flogged in the public square and lose all their property.
    2. If someone doesn't understand this in a good way, I suggest sending them into slavery in return. To Africa. For 20 years, without parole.
    He will definitely understand there.
    1. 0
      27 March 2026 16: 43
      Quote: Grandfather is an amateur
      My personal opinion: if the countries that were involved in the slave trade

      Quote: Grandfather is an amateur
      Pay out the money

      to whom ?!
      A list of countries. The funniest thing is that there isn't a single country that doesn't have slave trade.
      Quote: Grandfather is an amateur
      If someone doesn't understand this in a good way, I suggest sending them into slavery in return. To Africa. For 20 years, without parole.

      where will you send the niggas?!
      after all, they were the ones selling the "ebony"
      What about the rest, or do you think that only blacks were enslaved, and the slave trade was only in the West?
  25. +1
    27 March 2026 16: 37
    Only three voted against: the United States, Argentina and Israel.
    Well, it’s clear that the United States was involved in the slave trade and even Washington had slaves, but I didn’t think that Israel was involved in this.
    1. +2
      27 March 2026 17: 05
      I didn't think Israel was doing this.
      Jewish merchants financed it all.
  26. -2
    27 March 2026 16: 39
    So it’s time to remember the Mongol yoke and count the damage!
  27. 0
    27 March 2026 16: 41
    Quote: hrych
    Blacks were sold to slave traders by blacks themselves.
    By the way, that's a funny historical fact. Who commissioned it? laughing
  28. 0
    27 March 2026 16: 59
    And how much does Britain owe the sepoys and the Chinese for genocide? They should pay for their colonial crimes, which enriched them.
  29. +1
    27 March 2026 17: 01
    And when will we present Germany with a bill for the destroyed cities and villages? And the millions of dead and other civilians? Why isn't this issue being raised by our representatives at the UN?
    1. +2
      27 March 2026 17: 06
      The question is being raised. Even in Russian law, Hitler's actions are recognized as genocide against the Soviet people. Thanks to Yegor Yakovlev and Dmitry Puchkov for this initiative.
    2. -1
      27 March 2026 17: 18
      Quote: Schneeberg
      When will we present Germany with a bill for the destroyed cities and villages? Why isn't this issue being raised by our representatives at the UN?

      What does the UN have to do with this?!!
      This issue was resolved by the Soviet government 80 years ago
  30. +1
    27 March 2026 17: 02
    What do we care?
    A resolution that is useless for the world and Russia. A fart in the air.
  31. +1
    27 March 2026 17: 04
    And this worthless office does not want to recognize the extermination of approximately 27 million Soviet citizens (of which more than 25 million were purely civilians) by Nazi Germany and its allies as the most monstrous crime against humanity?
  32. 0
    27 March 2026 17: 14
    Enchanting nonsense.
    That the slave trade is wrong is self-evident and requires no comment. But why are we talking about reparations now? To whom? Those who live in Africa—their fathers, grandfathers, and great-grandfathers—didn't know what slavery was. What should they be compensated for? It's as absurd as reparations to Israelis for the Holocaust. Clearly, if someone personally suffered at the hands of the fascist regime, monetary compensation is perfectly reasonable. But what does this have to do with Jews, when the bulk of those who suffered were Soviet citizens? It's all or none. But the vast majority of those who suffered have long since departed for a better world.
    So... Well, let's make Africa pay Spain for conquering its lands once upon a time. Let's make Italy pay the whole of Europe for its slave system. Who are Genghis Khan's great-grandchildren? Chip in for the Mongol-Tatar yoke... And Napoleon's descendants, fork out some cash...
    Brad.
    It was necessary to fight for the rights of long-dead ancestors a little earlier.
    And right now, the world is in a state of absolute chaos - but the General Assembly couldn't care less, no, it would rather fight slavery, which was already defeated long ago...
  33. BAI
    +1
    27 March 2026 17: 16
    The US seems to be paying its blacks. Let them pay the rest too.
  34. +1
    27 March 2026 17: 21
    Nonsense. Firstly, no one gives a damn about the UN General Assembly Resolution. Secondly, blacks were most often bought from tribal leaders, so it was a fair deal, and the Africans themselves were to blame for getting it cheap. Thirdly, there was no crime; today's concepts can't be applied to that time. And weren't the Crusades a crime? What whites did in Africa was worse than the deportation of blacks.
    1. +1
      27 March 2026 17: 22
      Quote: Victor Sergeev
      Yes, what the whites did

      And what did the Ottomans do?!
      And what did the Japs do?
      Why do we always focus on white people? As a white person, I don't really like it!
  35. +2
    27 March 2026 17: 24
    A modest question: is the genocide of Native Americans by the Spanish, the British, and other scum a lesser crime against humanity? What about the genocide of the natives? What about India?
  36. +2
    27 March 2026 17: 44
    The article paints a fairly accurate historical picture: African blacks themselves enslaved their own people and then sold them to whites. The picture clearly shows who shackled the unfortunate slaves. But the Ghanaian government doesn't seem to be holding itself accountable for this. That's a different matter.
  37. +2
    27 March 2026 18: 25
    Why do current African governments consider themselves the legal successors of those slaves? They are the descendants of the tribes that SOLD blacks to slave traders. But "the murderer does not inherit the murdered."
  38. +1
    27 March 2026 18: 42
    Perfectly!
    Returning to one's historical homeland, at least within the continent, should also be considered as an option. Tickets and baggage transportation are, of course, at the host party's expense.
  39. +1
    27 March 2026 20: 15
    The decision is correct. It's too bad it's not enforceable. Once again, I'm convinced of the UN's inadequacy and ineptitude. But a bad start is a bad start; maybe they'll get to the Palestinians and others, too. And maybe they'll even charge General Skobelev for his campaigns in Central Asia. laughing ?
  40. 0
    28 March 2026 06: 59
    How many years have passed since then? The UN was only just beginning to condemn it. We're waiting the same number of years for a condemnation of the situation in Donbas and Luhansk as a result of the actions of Ukraine and its partners (NATO, the US). What a long neck this UN giraffe has...
  41. 0
    28 March 2026 07: 01
    Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
    This is as much nonsense as reparations to Israelis for the Holocaust.


    Nevertheless, it exists. So, a fact is sometimes more weighty than an idea.
  42. +1
    28 March 2026 07: 03
    Quote: Andrey from Chelyabinsk
    But what do Jews have to do with it when the bulk of the victims were Soviet people?


    Because they are God's chosen ones, because they are impudent (chutzpah-bearers), because they kneaded all this dough for a reason. You know the answer yourself.
  43. +1
    28 March 2026 14: 32
    These calls from the UN General Assembly are simply hot air, a routine matter. None of the colonizers will ever pay any reparations to their colonies. I'm sure they're just talking to show off their work and let off some steam. And the mentality of the elites of the colonizing countries hasn't changed at all; they've simply become more secretive and cunning in their plans to continue plundering all weak countries that have something to plunder.
  44. 0
    29 March 2026 08: 58
    We hope they will make an official apology to Africa.

    I wonder who will do this... laughing