Shadow over the Persian Gulf: A Strategic Perspective on the 82nd Airborne Division's Possible Invasion of Iran

19 677 61
Shadow over the Persian Gulf: A Strategic Perspective on the 82nd Airborne Division's Possible Invasion of Iran


In March 2026, the world once again found itself on the brink of a major military conflict. The Pentagon ordered the transfer of a command element of the 82nd Airborne Division to the Middle East. One of the brigades, numbering approximately 3,000 troops, is being sent to the region, joined by over 5,000 Marines. Officially, this is being positioned as preparation for "potential ground operations." Unofficially, everyone understands: this refers to Iran.



This news Deserves close attention not only as a military but also as a historical and cultural phenomenon. The 82nd Airborne is more than just a combat unit. It is a symbol of American military might, forged in the fires of two world wars, dozens of local conflicts, and hundreds of Hollywood blockbusters. To understand what it represents is to understand the logic behind the type of military operations Washington is preparing for today.

From Infantry Regiment to "All-American" Division


The 82nd Division was formed in 1917 in Georgia, just as the United States entered World War I. Back then, it was no different from hundreds of other infantry units, except for one thing. Its ranks included soldiers from all 48 states of the United States. Thus, the division earned the nickname "All American." A red square with a blue circle and the white letters "AA" appeared on its patch, and its motto became "All the way!"

As early as 1918, the division was transferred to France, where it suffered heavy losses. After the war, it was demobilized, and that was it. story could have ended. But in 1942, the division was revived and transformed into an airborne division, the first in the American army.

This decision changed everything. The parachute landing in Sicily, the battles at Anzio, Normandy, the Ardennes, and Operation Market Garden in the Netherlands. General George Patton called it "America's honor guard." But behind this beautiful phrase lay a terrible price: more than five thousand paratroopers, almost half of the force, died in Normandy alone.


However, the history of the 82nd Division is not all triumphs. In the fall of 1944, during Operation Market Garden, the paratroopers failed to quickly capture a key bridge in Nijmegen and were stuck for 36 hours. This was enough for the Germans to consolidate their position. The British units in Arnhem were routed, and the breakthrough into Germany failed. The reasons for this were planning errors, the landing in several waves, and a German reconnaissance miss. tank grouping.

This episode is worth remembering today. It demonstrates that even the world's most "elite" airborne division can fail if the operation is poorly planned or the enemy proves stronger than expected.

The Anatomy of a "Fast Fist"


Today, the 82nd Airborne Division is based at Fort Bragg, North Carolina. It is part of the XVIII Airborne Corps and serves as the U.S. Army's premier rapid-response unit.

The main principle is "18 hours." This is the time within which a division must be ready to deploy anywhere in the world. Not in a week, not in three days, but in eighteen hours. This metric determines everything: structure, weapons, training, and rotation.

The division, numbering from 18 to 20 thousand people, includes three infantry brigade combat groups, aviation brigade, divisional artillery, a logistics brigade and many specialized units: engineers, reconnaissance, electronic warfare, and air defense.

Each brigade combat team, with approximately 3800-4200 troops, consists of three paratroop battalions, a cavalry reconnaissance squadron, an artillery battalion with 18 M119A3 105mm howitzers, an engineer battalion, and a logistics battalion.

The armament is selected with airlift capabilities in mind: M4A1 assault rifles, M249 and M240 machine guns, sniper rifles, FGM-148 Javelin anti-tank guided missiles, Carl Gustaf recoilless rifles, M119 howitzers, and, if necessary, the heavier M777 155mm howitzers. Mobility is provided by JLTVs and Infantry Squad Vehicles, as well as the combat aviation brigade's UH-60 Black Hawk and CH-47 Chinook helicopters.


There is a belief within the division that may seem naive to an outside observer, but which actually reflects the essence of the concept: the main thing weaponThis isn't equipment, but a trained paratrooper. Every service member undergoes airborne training, regardless of specialty. First, parachute jumps, then service in a division.

The rotation system is rigorous: one brigade is on immediate deployment with surprise inspections, the second undergoes intensive training, and the third recovers and maintains equipment. Physical training follows the ACFT standard: six exercises simulating real combat loads. Particular emphasis is placed on actions at the squad and platoon levels: command believes that mistakes at this level cannot be corrected in combat.

"Force penetration" strategy


The 82nd Division was created for operations known in American military terminology as Joint Forcible Entry (JFE). This involves landing troops on enemy territory, capturing and holding key objectives such as airfields, ports, road junctions, and industrial complexes.

The classic scheme looks like this: first, a massive air suppression operation Defense and the destruction of enemy weapons. Then, a helicopter assault (the so-called "vertical clip") and parachute landing to seize a beachhead. After this, a buildup of forces is carried out through the captured airfield or port: heavier units, equipment, ammunition, and fuel are delivered here.

In this scheme, the 82nd plays the role of the "spearhead", the first echelon, which must wedge into the enemy's defense, consolidate, and provide conditions for the approach of the main forces.


Over the past decades, the division has employed this strategy repeatedly. Throughout the 1983 invasion of Grenada, the 1989 operation in Panama, and the 1991 Gulf War, the 82nd played a forward-deployment role. In Iraq and Afghanistan, paratroopers conducted both combat operations and stabilization missions. And in August 2021, it was units of the 82nd Division that facilitated the evacuation of Kabul: the last American soldier to leave Afghanistan was the division commander, General Christopher Donahue.

Kharg Island, the main target


According to numerous analytical publications from March 2026, the main potential target of the 82nd Division's operation in the event of a conflict with Iran could be Kharg Island, Iran's key oil export terminal in the Persian Gulf.

Kharg is more than just a patch of land in the middle of the sea. A significant portion of Iran's oil exports pass through its terminals. Capturing the island would simultaneously deal a blow to Iran's economy and create a springboard for further operations in the region.

Experts estimate that the island's defense is provided by between two and five thousand military personnel: units of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, marines, and coastal defense forces. Short- and medium-range air defense systems, anti-ship missiles, and other systems are deployed on the island. missile complexes, high-speed boats, combat dronesThere may be sea mines in the waters around the island.

The scenario that analysts are painting looks something like this.

First phase, suppression of defense. Massive cruise missile and air strikes against air defense positions, missile systems, and coastal batteries. Simultaneously, the island was blockaded from the sea by US Navy forces.

Second phase, helicopter landing. Assault teams in UH-60 helicopters and MV-22 Osprey tiltrotor aircraft land on the island, seizing the airstrip, port facilities, and command posts. This is the most dangerous moment: the paratroopers are vulnerable to the remnants of air defenses, drone strikes, and missile attacks.

The third phase is building up strength. Once the airfield is captured, the airlift begins: C-130 and C-17 transport aircraft deliver reinforcements, equipment, artillery, and supplies. A full-scale force should be deployed to the island within 24-72 hours.

The fourth phase is retention. The 82nd Division is transitioning to defending captured objectives, repelling counterattacks by Iranian forces. It is gradually being replaced by heavier units.

One brigade combat team of the 82nd Division is 3500-4200 personnel. The Iranian force at Kharg numbers between 2000 and 5000. At first glance, the Iranians' numerical parity or even a slight advantage appears to be against the paratroopers. However, as analysts note, it's not the numbers that matter, but technological superiority: integrated intelligence, precision weapons, air superiority, communications, and command and control.

Weaknesses of the "tip of the spear"


The 82nd Division is a light infantry unit. It has no tanks, no heavy armored personnel carriers, no multiple launch rocket systems. Its firepower is limited to 105mm howitzers, mortars, and anti-tank missiles. This is a deliberate choice: lightness ensures mobility and the ability to quickly deploy. But in combat against a serious enemy, this choice proves vulnerable.

As military expert Sergei Khatylev notes in an interview with KP.RU, light infantry is sufficient for a short battle, typically an hour or two. After that, equipment, artillery, and multiple launch rocket systems are needed. And these may not be available at the initial stage of an operation.

An even more serious problem is logistics. The 82nd Division can seize a bridgehead, but it cannot be held without a steady supply of fuel, ammunition, food, and medicine. And logistics in remote theaters of war depend on transport aircraft and naval convoys, which themselves become targets for the enemy.

Iran has already demonstrated its readiness to attack rear communications: in March 2026, it launched ballistic missile strikes against the Diego Garcia base in the Indian Ocean, through which the group's supplies are routed. Without reliable logistics, any amphibious operation becomes a gamble.

Modern conflicts have shown that light infantry is particularly vulnerable to massive drone attacks. Iran is actively developing this very approach: Chinese GEPRC Mark LR10 FPV drones have already been deployed on Kharg Island. Saturating the battlefield with hundreds or thousands of cheap attack drones drones could neutralize the Americans' technological superiority and turn the landing operation into a bloody meat grinder.

Ghost of the Eagle Claw


When discussing a possible operation against Iran, one cannot help but recall a tragic precedent. In April 1980, the United States launched Operation Eagle Claw, an attempt to rescue hostages at the American embassy in Tehran. The top special forces forces participated: Delta Force, Rangers, and Marines.

The plan was daring: to land stealthily in the desert, reach Tehran by car, free the hostages, and evacuate through the captured airfield. But everything went wrong from the start. Of the eight helicopters, one crashed immediately after takeoff, a second was lost in a dust storm, and a third was disabled. At the landing site, it turned out that the "dead desert" was actually an area near a busy highway.


The outcome was catastrophic: during refueling, one of the helicopters crashed into a tanker aircraft, killing eight American soldiers. The mission was canceled. The bodies of their comrades, equipment, and classified materials had to be abandoned.

This operation forever changed the American military leadership's approach to operations in Iran. It demonstrated that even the world's best fighters cannot compensate for poor planning, technical shortcomings, and underestimating the enemy.

Today's situation is certainly different from 1980. The United States has colossal combat experience gained during a quarter-century of wars in the Middle East. Modern communications, intelligence, and command and control technologies are incomparable to what they were 46 years ago. But Iran in 2026 is not the Iran of 1980. The country has created a deeply layered defense system, possesses thousands of missiles of various types, and a powerful fleet speedboats and an army of drones.

Marines: Second Echelon


The 82nd Marine Division won't be operating alone. It will be accompanied by the 31st Marine Expeditionary Unit (31st MEU), a self-sufficient force of approximately 2200 personnel capable of operating from naval platforms.


The 31st MEU is based on the ships of the Tripoli Amphibious Group, which transited the Strait of Malacca in March 2026 and headed to a potential conflict zone. The flagship, the amphibious assault ship USS Tripoli, was replenishing supplies at the Diego Garcia base in late March.


The Marines' role in this potential operation is to establish an initial beachhead: landing assault teams, clearing mines along the approaches, and restoring infrastructure. MV-22 Osprey tiltrotor aircraft will provide mobility and fire support until the ground infrastructure is ready to receive heavy transport aircraft.

Signal or blow?


The deployment of the 82nd Division headquarters to Kuwait is a powerful signal in itself. In military strategy, there's a concept called "force projection," where the movement of military units is used as a tool of pressure without direct application.

As expert Sergei Khatylev notes, what's happening appears primarily to be a show of force, an element of information pressure. There are no signs yet of the deployment of sufficient equipment, ammunition, and supplies for a full-fledged ground operation. Rather, we can expect "demonstrative actions": landings, indicating a presence, and establishing positions for negotiations.

But history has seen many examples of demonstrations escalating into actual military action. It's enough to recall how the wars in Iraq and Yugoslavia began.

The combination of a forward airborne division headquarters and a Marine Expeditionary Force provides Washington with a flexible toolbox. This could range from a quick, limited-objective operation (capturing key objectives) to escalating to full-scale ground combat.

The choice of scenario depends on many factors: the political situation in Washington, the position of allies, Iran's actions, and pressure from the international community. But the very fact of the deployment demonstrates that the option of a military solution is being seriously considered.

A blade that can injure its owner


The 82nd Airborne Division is, without exaggeration, one of the most combat-ready and well-coordinated military instruments in the world. Its history, training, equipment, and fighting spirit make it a formidable force. But, like any blade without a sheath, it can also injure those who wield it.

An operation against Iran, even a limited one, is fraught with enormous risks. Light infantry, lacking heavy weapons and dependent on fragile supply chains, could find itself trapped in a captured beachhead. Iran is not Grenada or Panama. It is a country with a population of 88 million, a powerful military-industrial complex, a missile arsenal, and a readiness for a protracted war.

History teaches us that even the world's best paratroopers cannot compensate for strategic miscalculations. Normandy, Arnhem, and Operation Eagle's Claw—all these operations demonstrate that the outcome is determined not only by the bravery of the soldiers but also by the quality of planning, an adequate assessment of the enemy, and an understanding of one's own limitations.

In March 2026, the 82nd Airborne Division once again found itself on the front lines. Whether the world is prepared for what happens next remains an open question. But one thing is certain: if the "All-American" Division is thrown into battle, it will be an event with consequences far beyond the immediate military operation. It will be an event that will shape the Middle East, and perhaps the entire world, for decades to come.
61 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. + 10
    28 March 2026 05: 00
    Thank you Leo!
    This is an interesting article that allows even the most novice to grasp the principle of using US mobile forces anywhere on the planet.
    Whether the world is ready for what happens next remains an open question. But one thing is certain: if the All-American Division is thrown into battle, it will be an event with consequences far beyond the military operation. It will be an event that will shape the Middle East, and perhaps the entire world, for decades to come.

    I daresay that capturing Kharg Island is not the goal of the operation, and the landing will take place on the Iranian shore of the Strait of Hormuz. Furthermore, a limited operation to consolidate the beachhead is pointless. With Iran's resistance uncrushed, this beachhead will become a constant site for firing on American units, with no operational prospects, like the Nevsky Pyatachok.
    Given the significance of such a decision, as well as the understanding by all parties to the conflict of the logic of the development of events, it should be realized that the opposing side will not passively repel the attack, but will try to seize the initiative, and, possibly, preempt the actions of the Airborne Forces and Marines, especially by striking at communications.
    Apparently, the war will either be stopped in one form or another, or will escalate to a total war, and it would be good if it were limited to the region.
    1. +2
      28 March 2026 05: 34
      Most likely, the attack will be on one of the islands in the Strait of Hormuz.
      1. +3
        28 March 2026 05: 37
        As a diversionary tactic, it's suitable.
        The goal of the operation is a variation on the theme of Malaya Zemlya and the Nevsky Pyatachok.
        Instruments like the 82 AA are used only in strategic operations, such as the complete defeat and regime change in Iran. Something tells me that not all players agree with this agenda.
        1. +1
          28 March 2026 06: 15
          So, unblocking the Strait of Hormuz is a strategic operation.
          1. +3
            28 March 2026 23: 45
            It's important to remember, however, that the Strait of Hormuz wasn't blocked before the American-Israeli aggression. That is, the Americans themselves created the strategic problem and will now heroically resolve it through a "strategic operation." It's also important to remember that unblocking the strait doesn't mean allowing tankers and gas carriers to pass through, but rather ensuring their safe passage. This is highly problematic, given Iran's large number of drones and missiles, even if it seizes some islands and some coastal areas. And the Houthis also control the entrance to the Red Sea.
            1. 0
              29 March 2026 06: 11
              You'll soon see how it all ends.
        2. 0
          28 March 2026 10: 58
          Quote: Victor Leningradets
          As a diversionary tactic, it's suitable.
          The goal of the operation is a variation on the theme of Malaya Zemlya and the Nevsky Pyatachok.
          Instruments like the 82 AA are used only in strategic operations, such as the complete defeat and regime change in Iran. Something tells me that not all players agree with this agenda.

          The deployed Marines and paratroopers won't be enough to establish a large beachhead. If the US decides to land, they'll face a bloodbath.
          They will probably advance through Kuwait.
          1. +2
            29 March 2026 14: 46
            Quote: Bearded
            They will probably advance through Kuwait.

            Do they have anything to attack with? They haven't formed a coalition, their own forces in the region are insufficient, and they haven't concentrated their invasion forces. Right now, they're reacting purely reactively—a reaction to the failure of "Epic Stupidity," which escalated into Operation Persian Fury.
            Most likely, a landing operation in the Hormuz area, with an attempt to cement this with agreements or as a pretext to finally bring NATO into the fold. So this will be a long time coming. Probably until autumn, for sure. And without any bright prospects. Israel's fate is equally bleak, and the longer the conflict, the more difficult it will be.
            But this is precisely the "good war".
            At least for Russia.
            And for the world as a whole. The hegemon isn't just strained; it's actually breaking down right now. And NATO is falling apart due to the cowardice and parochialism of the Euro-limitrophes. These are the preconditions for the collapse of the Bretton Woods agreements and the new energy security rules. And, of course, this has more than convinced everyone that it is IMPOSSIBLE to negotiate with the US and the West in general. How unacceptable is their dominance in the world with their whims and desires... But this is also a challenge for Russia – are we ready for Sovereignty?
            So GDP is using this word more and more often.
            What is it for ?
            And have you noticed how quiet and inconspicuous D.A. Medvedev has become?
            Iran, however, has all the prerequisites for future greatness. For right now, it is covering itself with glory that will last a long time. Epics will be composed about this. Only true heroes can fight like this.
            But it will be hard for Israel.
            And the fate of the Gulf Arab monarchies is very uncertain.
            1. +1
              29 March 2026 16: 42
              Quote: bayard
              Quote: Bearded
              They will probably advance through Kuwait.

              Do they have anything to attack with? They haven't formed a coalition, their own forces in the region are insufficient, and they haven't concentrated their invasion forces. Right now, they're reacting purely reactively—a reaction to the failure of "Epic Stupidity," which escalated into Operation Persian Fury.
              Most likely, a landing operation in the Hormuz area, with an attempt to cement this with agreements or as a pretext to finally bring NATO into the fold. So this will be a long time coming. Probably until autumn, for sure. And without any bright prospects. Israel's fate is equally bleak, and the longer the conflict, the more difficult it will be.
              But this is precisely the "good war".
              At least for Russia.
              And for the world as a whole. The hegemon isn't just strained; it's actually breaking down right now. And NATO is falling apart due to the cowardice and parochialism of the Euro-limitrophes. These are the preconditions for the collapse of the Bretton Woods agreements and the new energy security rules. And, of course, this has more than convinced everyone that it is IMPOSSIBLE to negotiate with the US and the West in general. How unacceptable is their dominance in the world with their whims and desires... But this is also a challenge for Russia – are we ready for Sovereignty?
              So GDP is using this word more and more often.
              What is it for ?
              And have you noticed how quiet and inconspicuous D.A. Medvedev has become?
              Iran, however, has all the prerequisites for future greatness. For right now, it is covering itself with glory that will last a long time. Epics will be composed about this. Only true heroes can fight like this.
              But it will be hard for Israel.
              And the fate of the Gulf Arab monarchies is very uncertain.

              The fate of the Arab monarchies is clear: those who do not die of hunger and thirst will switch from Rolls-Royces to camels and wander the desert.
              Israel will also get: oil refineries, desalination plants, power plants, a dirty bomb.
              We need this war to drag on for another five years. Then Hekhemon will definitely be finished. am good drinks
              1. +2
                29 March 2026 18: 09
                We need a Khan for Europe, and especially for its neighbor. And let the hegemon, even if torn, remain as a counterweight to China. I don't like peace with China without a hegemon. And no one who has dealt with China likes it. Let them both be equally happy and entertained (by dealing with each other).
                So, we would like Trump to drag Europe, and most importantly, England, into the Persian War Vortex. Then it will be easier for us to resolve our issues, conduct trade, and form alliances. And let Ahura Mazda judge them all there for his Strait (the Strait of Hormuz means the Strait of Ahura Mazda).
                Quote: Bearded
                Israel will also get: oil refineries, desalination plants, power plants, a dirty bomb.

                Just don't throw in the dirt with the bombs, let everything be as Netanyahu wanted. Did he ask for war? He got it. Did he want to kill the Rahbar and his kin? He killed them, even twice. And now, as is customary in the East, accept Persian gingerbread. Sometimes, in order to better understand what you want and whether your desires are right, you need to fight properly. If you are a child at heart and believe in fairy tales, you will gain experience of life through scars and bumps, through pain and blood, destruction and the death of your loved ones.
                Quote: Bearded
                The fate of the Arab monarchies is clear: they will switch from Rolls-Royces to camels.

                They would have to experience all of this... Which is becoming more and more intricate and multi-variant.
      2. +1
        28 March 2026 06: 17
        Most likely, the attack will be on one of the islands in the Strait of Hormuz.

        Most likely, they will gradually take over the three islands in the narrows and the oil-rich Kharg.

        I'm also very skeptical about the "drone threat." FPV drones don't fly over 30 km on fiber optics, and the Americans can easily jam any form of radio control in a local area.
        The Iranians do not have any homing drones with target recognition and selection capabilities.
        The main thing is, we'll see soon. And there's even a glimmer of hope that we'll draw some conclusions.
        1. +4
          28 March 2026 06: 19
          The island is in the depths, plus the infrastructure is damaged, they can mine the island, plus MLRS shelling, 30 km is enough there.
      3. 0
        28 March 2026 10: 11
        Will the boats make it?
        1. +1
          28 March 2026 11: 51
          That's the question, they are strong, but the missiles are almost point-blank.
  2. +4
    28 March 2026 05: 04
    It's like I read a propaganda piece.
    I hope the Iranians raze the headquarters of the US 82nd Airborne Division in Kuwait...we need to hit the enemy's command centers wherever they are.
    1. 0
      28 March 2026 06: 06
      Yes, it seems normal. It's clear that the division's past combat history can hardly be called glorious. And its future, if it gets involved in Iran, is uncertain and likely tragic.
      1. +5
        28 March 2026 06: 37
        Quote: Captive
        It is clear that the division’s past combat history can hardly be called glorious.

        Yes, in principle, it's possible. For the American army, in general, it's simply a model. Of course, before ours... Before the Panfilov Division, it was like crawling to China on all fours via Acapulco, but the division did participate in practically all significant operations of the US ground forces, and at the forefront.
      2. +3
        28 March 2026 06: 50
        Quote: Captive
        And its future, if it gets involved in Iran, is unclear and most likely tragic.

        Most likely, yes. All airborne forces basically have the same strategy and mission. The 82nd Division has nothing new or different:
        This means landing troops on enemy territory, with the capture and holding of key objects.
        After this, a build-up of forces is carried out through the captured airfield or port: heavier units, equipment, ammunition, and fuel arrive here.
        This could be problematic; the logistics are long and drawn-out. If the island is seized, it will simply be a show-off and an excuse for Trump to boast about another victory. But they won't be able to hold it for long; Iran will bombard them with missiles and drones.
        1. 0
          28 March 2026 07: 13
          That's exactly it, logistics. Iran has smashed the bases to shreds. So these "elites" are essentially suicide bombers.
        2. +3
          28 March 2026 21: 14
          The US Army has two types of airborne divisions: the 82nd, a classic parachute division, and the 101st, an airborne assault division. The parachute division is designed to conduct classic airborne assaults to capture and hold enemy command posts, airfields, and logistics until the main forces arrive. The airborne assault division is designed to exploit success, preventing retreating forces from breaking through enemy defenses and establishing new positions. This is achieved through helicopter drops at road intersections, near bridges, and so on. Both divisions can perform both types of operations; each is more specialized in one type.
    2. +2
      28 March 2026 06: 49
      Quote: The same LYOKHA
      It's like I read a propaganda piece.

      In any case, whether this operation takes place or not, the BV will be on fire for a long time.
    3. +7
      28 March 2026 10: 12
      Quote: The same Lech
      It's like I read a propaganda piece.
      I hope the Iranians raze the headquarters of the US 82nd Airborne Division in Kuwait...we need to hit the enemy's command centers wherever they are.

      Damn, how much more can this go on...
      "Rub to the ground" is possible exceptional a massive bombing with the release of a couple of kilotons of explosives - which is clearly not going to happen.
      And 100 drones will kill 10-15 people, burn the command modules and that's it....
    4. -1
      28 March 2026 10: 12
      Well, I was also surprised, such a goal even without "Fateh"?
  3. +3
    28 March 2026 05: 37
    If the CIA succeeds in buying off Iranian generals from the army and the IRGC, it will be like Iraq and Libya. And if they don't, it will be like Vietnam and Afghanistan. But Trump won't go for the latter option, because it would be the end for him. The Democrats will come to power, "on coffins," and they will definitely lock Donnie up.
    1. +3
      28 March 2026 05: 45
      If the CIA succeeds in buying off Iranian generals from the army and the IRGC, it will turn out like in Iraq and Libya.

      This will no longer be possible. The country has been established under the pragmatic dictatorship of the IRGC, a theocracy, and civilian structures and the army have been transformed into the executive mechanisms of a totalitarian regime. Any attempt by the IRGC to negotiate with the enemy means a complete loss of power and even life itself. So, "We will quit"—"We will not lose"—is the path the current leadership is taking.
      1. +3
        28 March 2026 05: 56
        If you're right, there won't be any ground operation. The US President won't risk the lives of hundreds, maybe even thousands, of soldiers, and Congress won't allow it. But the bombings and rocket attacks will continue.
        1. +5
          28 March 2026 06: 34
          The US President won't risk the lives of hundreds, perhaps even thousands, of soldiers, and Congress won't allow it. But the bombings and rocket attacks will continue.

          Then Trump and the forces behind him are political corpses. It's easier to deal with Congress as Napoleon did with his son-in-law in 1799.
          However, even a brilliantly executed operation does not save the Trumpists from this step.
        2. -1
          29 March 2026 00: 01
          Jewish lives are more valuable.
    2. 0
      28 March 2026 05: 55
      The CIA will not have such luck with Ismail Qaani again... and his public suicide is a warning to all traitors... that they will be treated in the same way.
      And it is right...
    3. +1
      28 March 2026 08: 40
      Donnie is getting quite old, and as a politician, he's finished anyway. What if he's decided to become a kamikaze for the last time; he has nothing left to lose anyway? And then he'll set the Middle East on fire as a final act, in order to effect America's retreat to the Western Hemisphere, in accordance with the Monroe Doctrine? Where will America temporarily retreat, leaving all its competitors with a huge pile of problems? What if this is his true goal, not his stated one?
      1. 0
        28 March 2026 08: 50
        What if this is his true goal, and not his stated one?

        This is simply wonderful! Europe and its EU are screwed. Russia benefits completely. And China and the rest of Southeast Asia will bounce back at Russia's expense.
        For this, Donya was immediately promoted from colonel to lieutenant general and awarded the "For Services to the Fatherland, 1st degree."
        1. 0
          28 March 2026 09: 04
          No, if he's really following this plan, he'll need to do something to really worry China and India for a long time... And it wouldn't hurt to trigger a new war for Russia either.
          1. +1
            28 March 2026 10: 27
            Quote: paul3390
            Next, he needs to worry China and India about something very strongly and for a long time

            В ideally - a war between India and China, and at the same time Russia will get stuck there
            1. +2
              28 March 2026 13: 35
              Quote: your1970
              В ideally - a war between India and China, and at the same time Russia will get stuck there

              So, the USSR didn't get bogged down in the wars between India and China, but the Russian Federation will somehow get bogged down. What should the Russian Federation do in this war?
              No matter how many years the Military Council has been around, there are always those angry forum members sitting on their couches who want to send Russia into another war...
              1. 0
                29 March 2026 12: 43
                Quote: commbatant
                No matter how many years the Military Council has been around, there are always those angry forum members sitting on their couches who want to send Russia into another war...

                The discussion was about what to do. USA belay belay
                Quote: paul3390
                No, if he's really following this plan, he'll need to do something to really worry China and India for a long time... And it wouldn't hurt to trigger a new war for Russia either.

                To which my answer followed that for USA
                Quote: your1970
                Ideally, there will be a war between India and China, and at the same time, Russia will get stuck there.
                1. 0
                  29 March 2026 13: 42
                  Quote: your1970

                  The discussion was about what to do. USA belay belay
                  Quote: paul3390
                  No, if he's really following this plan, he'll need to do something to really worry China and India for a long time... And it wouldn't hurt to trigger a new war for Russia either.

                  To which my answer followed that for USA
                  Quote: your1970
                  Ideally, there will be a war between India and China, and at the same time, Russia will get stuck there.

                  That's how I answered your answer.
                  your1970
                  that the Russian Federation has no place in the war between China and India, just as there was no place in the previous wars between them under the USSR.
                  1. 0
                    29 March 2026 19: 16
                    Quote: commbatant
                    that the Russian Federation has no place in the war between China and India, just as it had no place in the previous wars between them under the USSR.

                    No one (including the US) tried to drag the USSR into it. They were able to tear China apart, but they didn't try to side with India.
                    So this is an ideal for the United States, perhaps not achievable, but an ideal.
      2. +2
        28 March 2026 19: 33
        What if he decided to become a kamikaze one last time, since he has nothing to lose anyway?
        But Vance and Rubio have something to lose. Where do such sentimental dreams come from, Count? hi
      3. +1
        28 March 2026 21: 16
        This Donnie reminds me of someone...
  4. The comment was deleted.
  5. The comment was deleted.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  6. The comment was deleted.
  7. +3
    28 March 2026 07: 05
    So, from the article, I realized that the 82nd hasn't had a truly worthy adversary with proper training and weapons in the last 80 years. It's one thing to chase away Papuans, but it's quite another to clash with the XI on foot on the mainland. Then we'll see who's the real deal.
    1. +5
      28 March 2026 07: 56
      that there was no truly worthy opponent...

      They weren't always lucky. In Grenada, they ran into Cuban construction battalion soldiers.
      1. -1
        28 March 2026 22: 26
        In Grenada we ran into Cuban construction battalions.

        And how did it end?
    2. +1
      28 March 2026 08: 28
      Quote from: FoBoss_VM
      It's another matter to clash with the XIR on foot on the mainland

      Moreover, it must be added that this is under conditions where the enemy will be not even several times larger, but at least an order of magnitude larger.
    3. +3
      28 March 2026 13: 31
      Quote from: FoBoss_VM
      That is, from the article I understood that the 82nd has not had a truly worthy adversary with good training and weapons in the last 80 years.

      What about the regular Iraqi army, hardened in the war with Iran?
    4. +2
      28 March 2026 16: 24
      Especially since there's someone to compare it to. 6th Company, Argun Gorge... Where the ratio of paratroopers killed to fighters destroyed was 1 to 5... And most of them were conscripts...
      1. +3
        28 March 2026 21: 21
        The best soldiers are conscripts, they are, as in that song: “The army of the country, the army of the people.”
        And "professionals" are mercenaries. It's no coincidence that Hannibal lost the Second Punic War to Rome, because while you can kill for money, no one will die for money. Republican France was the first in Europe to introduce conscription, which ensured victories for both it and Napoleon.
  8. 0
    28 March 2026 09: 00
    Thanks for the article! It was interesting to read!
    In my opinion, if the 82nd Airborne Division units are to land, it will be in a joint operation with the Marines to capture Qeshm Island and small islands in the Bandar Abbas area, to unblock and control the Strait of Hormuz and exit the main naval base, the Iranian Navy and the IRGC.
  9. +2
    28 March 2026 09: 37
    Wimps !!!
    Ugandan army commander Muhoozi Kainerugaba promised to conquer Iran within two weeks. His repost is being shared on social media.

    "It won't take us more than two weeks to capture Tehran; one brigade will be enough."
    https://eadaily.com/ru/news/2026/03/27/komandarm-ugandy-poobeshchal-zahvatit-iran-za-dve-nedeli
  10. AMG
    +3
    28 March 2026 09: 57
    Isn't the last paragraph, about a possible landing having a profound impact on the Middle East and possibly the entire world, a rather bold and self-assured statement? In fact, that landscape has already changed since the bombing of Iran began on February 28, 2026.
  11. 0
    28 March 2026 10: 09
    Nie wiem, dlaczego, może to z powodu Krety w 1941 roku, a może Market- Garden, ale wydaje mi się, ,e jednostki typu tej dywizji są przereklamowane i bardziej do pokazów służą i napinania mięśni, niż walki rzeczywiście skutecznej, zwłaszcza z przeciwnikiem przygotowanym, zdeterminowanym i nie mającym wiele do stracenia, prócz 72 hurys ( lub białych rodzynek, co kto woli), jeśli zawiedzie.
    Wasze doświadczenia też nie są optymistyczne dla panów spadochroniarzy.
    Co do zaś wcześniejszego przygotowania przeciwnika za pomocą rakiet, bomb i innych atrakcji, to można przypomnieć przygotowania artyleryjskie z wojen światowych i ich mała skuteczność. Owszem, możliwe jest przypadkiem, że coś się uda. I wtedy wszyscy są zachwyceni i poklepują żywych po plecach.
    Tu jednak w grę wchodzi błąd dostępności. Tylko żywych można poklepywać. A co z niezywymi?
    Tych zaś jest więcej.
    Dużo więcej.
    Te wszystkie groźne z nazwy i budzące skojarzenia z fachowością i sprawnością jednostki nie miały dotychczas przeciwników. A nawet w ogóle nie bardzo walczyły z kimkolwiek. Training zaś to tylko przygotowanie fizyczne. Jeśli nie są to jednostki psychopatów, to gdy trafia w rzeczywisty bój, mogą być zdziwieni. A jak wiadomo, jeśli coś może zawieść, to zawiedzie.
    Czyli wszystko.
    Persowie są na własnym boisku. Znają je i mogą przygotować pod wieloma względami. Nawet gdy USA zdecydują na ładowanie gdzieś indziej niż wszyscy mówią, to nadal są daleko od mamusi i źródła wszelkiej siły. Muszą wszystko dowieźć. I odwieźć.
    Persowie zaś kto wie, co jeszcze mają w arsenale. Who wie w ogóle, co oni naprawdę kombinują. A jeśli już się ma ten uran, a sytuacja robi się tragiczna, to czemu go jednak nie użyć?
    Bomba nawet brudna, to nadal bomba. Who niby ma ich powstrzymać? Skoro ich ponoć sojusznicy mają ich w dupie?
    Sorry.
    Po co więc ta demonstracja usa?
    I tu dochodzimy do kwestii najważniejszej.
    Kto rządzi w USA i czy robi to racjonalnie, czy jest to dzieło szaleńca?
    Don Don?
    Jeśli tak, to odbędą się fajerwerki i następnie ogłoszony sukces.
    Żydzi?
    To samo, tylko bardziej.
    Neokonservatyści?
    That's it. Że wskazaniem na dalszy ciąg.
    Ktoś normalny?
    Dowiedzą się o tym specjaliści z 82.
    Pytanie, czy będą mieli okazję o tym powiedzieć
  12. +1
    28 March 2026 10: 46
    Or maybe it's simpler. The Americans will seize some kind of beachhead, not necessarily Hark, and then restrict the passage of tankers from Iran? It will be like a Mexican stalemate, with Iran restricting the west from the west. And if the US succeeds, then Iran will only be able to harass them with drones until they dig in. Iran might, of course, retaliate by destroying something in neighboring countries, but that's a different story.
  13. +4
    28 March 2026 10: 57
    Quote: your1970
    Ideally, there will be a war between India and China, and at the same time, Russia will get stuck there.
    What should Russia do in this war?
    1. +2
      28 March 2026 23: 26
      The Indo-Pakistani conflict is practically a line from a song. They've been having conflicts in the mountains for a long time. What they're dividing up there is absolutely unclear to me, but nevertheless, "border conflicts" happen all the time. Sometimes, even with the bodies of border guards.
  14. 0
    28 March 2026 13: 26
    The 82nd Airborne is more than just a combat unit. It is a symbol of American military might, forged in the fires of two world wars, dozens of local conflicts, and hundreds of Hollywood blockbusters.

    The 82nd Airborne Division arrived in Europe too late (mid-1918) during WWI and managed to participate with the Entente forces in two offensive operations, and after the end of WWI it departed back (04.1919) to the USA, where it again became an ordinary infantry division, and then deactivated.
    In March 03.1942, the 82nd Infantry Division was activated, and in August 08.1942 it was transformed into the 82nd Airborne Division, becoming a legendary airborne unit during WWII and after it, like the 101st Airborne Division (now the Airborne Division (Assault)), the 10th Airborne Division (now the LPD (Mountain)), the 11th Airborne Division (activated in 2022 in Alaska)...
  15. -2
    28 March 2026 14: 09
    A very good, comprehensive article, covering the entire story from the previous one to the current one, including both their successes and mistakes. Thanks to the author. hi
  16. +2
    28 March 2026 15: 21
    The article is interesting from an educational and military-technical perspective. Regarding combat tactics, without knowing the objectives, plans, and specific locations of the combat operation, one can only consider variants. In my opinion, the successful use of airborne forces could only be expected immediately after
    inflicting preemptive, massive missile strikes by air and naval forces using all types of MLRS in the first days or week, when there was panic and the possibility of the fall of the ruling regime.

    Trump's actions now look more like a gamble, blatantly false and clearly intimidating Iran, aimed at "saving face" and avoiding a shameful, or rather criminal, failure that would inflict grief and suffering on millions of people not only in Iran but around the world. If the courts don't yet have a criminal offense against military-political banditry involving the clearly targeted murder and/or robbery of citizens of other countries, then the International Court of Justice and the ECHR urgently need to introduce one, so that odious neo-Nazis and LGBT Satanists like Trump cannot escape responsibility for their actions.

    How many military conflicts have been unleashed at the US's initiative over NATO's 80 years of existence, with countless casualties and suffering? Dozens, if not hundreds, and who was responsible? To the shameful regret of all living generations, no one has been responsible, only awards and prizes. Shame on all Western "elite" Parzits! "Epstein to the rescue"...

    To overcome Nazi villainy in the world
    And eliminate the domination of parasites forever,
    We all need to become One, Good Force,
    Capable of Justice and Truth triumph!

    "Sodom and Gomorrah"*, tremble in anger,
    The spirit of Satanism and Nazism will not pass.
    The Creator will not forgive sin, no matter how you pray,
    And Holy Wrath will fall on you from heaven...

    https://stihi.ru/2014/03/21/7883
    1. -1
      28 March 2026 16: 30
      Well, in theory, no one should be stopping Iran from convicting Trump without a statute of limitations. And turning his life into hell, with him constantly hiding in dens... And after his presidency, it's unlikely he'll be as guarded as he is now, except perhaps by private contractors.
  17. +2
    28 March 2026 18: 45
    But behind this beautiful phrase lay a terrible price: in Normandy alone, more than five thousand paratroopers died, almost half of the personnel.
    The usual price for a landing: see the capture of Crete or our landing operations during the Great Patriotic War.
    And so, I think that the American landing is the dream of the Iranian army, which will finally be able to personally shake the Americans' throats.
  18. 0
    28 March 2026 23: 54
    After reading this article, you need to remember "Grozny with one parachute regiment." From Pasha-Mercedes.
  19. 0
    29 March 2026 04: 40
    While liberating the Kursk region from stray piglets, the Ukrainian Armed Forces lost 5000 tails a week... These 3.5 American "superheroes" from Marvel Studios gave Iran a couple of days to stretch their legs.
  20. 0
    29 March 2026 04: 58
    What kind of powerful force and resources would need to be assembled to search for and bury the soldiers of the 82nd Division and the 31st US Expeditionary Force after all four phases of this adventurous scenario?! In the blazing sun, the decomposition of the bodies would be short-lived, and the stench would spread all the way to the Red Sea.
  21. +1
    29 March 2026 19: 41
    I'm kind of confused, please help. On the one hand, we're talking about the end of airborne assaults due to the saturation of our air defenses, and we ourselves, for example, aren't landing anywhere, neither by sea nor by land, neither tactically nor as a division. But then we claim it's a panacea and that the 82nd will solve everything now, even though they're being welcomed like family. Sensei, explain to this idiot where I missed the point?