For the first time in history, antimatter was transported by truck.

12 260 61
For the first time in history, antimatter was transported by truck.

For the first time in stories A successful transport of antimatter was completed using a truck specially equipped for this purpose. Yesterday, as part of the Baryon-Antibaryon Symmetry Experiment (BASE) at the European Organization for Nuclear Research (CERN), the BASE-STEP antiproton trap was successfully moved across the entire main laboratory complex.

A statement from CERN's press service reported that scientists managed to collect a cloud of 92 antiprotons in an innovative portable cryogenic Penning trap, then detach it from the experimental setup, load it into a van, and, after transporting and unloading the antimatter, continue experiments with it. The experiment is not only complex but also dangerous, given that antimatter is extremely difficult to contain, as it annihilates upon contact with "ordinary" matter, causing a powerful explosion. However, the explosion is less terrifying than the loss of the precious samples that scientists have spent years literally collecting atom by atom.



The BASE-STEP system is a device weighing approximately 1 ton, equipped with a superconducting magnet, cryogenic cooling with liquid helium, a backup power supply, and a vacuum chamber. The device can withstand shock and vibration during transport. The trap uses magnetic and electric fields to contain the antiparticles. A fairly ordinary truck (pictured) was used to transport the complex equipment containing the antimatter.



The goal of the experiment is not simply a demonstration, but a practical one. A successful experiment will enable the safe transport of antiprotons to other European laboratories, such as the Heinrich-Heine-University of Düsseldorf (HHU), where high-precision measurements of the properties of antimatter can be performed.

CERN researcher Stefan Ulmer explained the practical purpose of the experiment:

Machines and equipment at CERN's "antimatter factory," where the BASE facility is located, create magnetic field fluctuations that limit the accuracy of our measurements. To better understand the fundamental properties of antiprotons, the experiment will need to be moved outside the laboratory building. In the long term, we want to be able to transport antimatter to any laboratory in Europe.

The CERN Antimatter Laboratory is the only place in the world where antiprotons can be produced, stored, and studied. Previous experiments have developed an innovative approach that allows for the next step: transporting antiprotons to a self-contained environment for more precise research and for sharing them with other scientists.

CERN Director of Research and Computing Gautier Hamel de Moncheneau:

Antimatter transport is a groundbreaking and ambitious project, and I congratulate the BASE collaboration on this impressive achievement. We are at the beginning of an exciting scientific avenue that will allow us to explore antimatter even more deeply.

Last May, the BASE-STEP container and transport system were already tested at the center's site. However, they didn't risk immediately launching the system with antimatter, instead testing it with 100 "regular" protons. CERN physicists now face a second, much more complex stage of the experiment, during which the container with antimatter will be transported by truck to Düsseldorf. The delivery will take over eight hours.

61 comment
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. + 13
    26 March 2026 21: 34
    As a military man, I immediately have a question:
    1 Mt of TNT - how many of these antiprotons are needed?
    And what are the damaging factors?
    1. +6
      26 March 2026 21: 45
      e=mc². A proton weighs 1,67 × 10⁻²⁴ grams. The annihilation of a proton-animproton pair releases 1,5 × 10 − 10 J (0,00000000015). A lot, in short. laughing
      1. +2
        26 March 2026 23: 21
        Quote: BoyCat
        During the annihilation of a proton-animproton pair, 1,5 × 10 − 10 J (0,00000000015) is released. A lot, in short.
        They should have explained to the military that a primitive Chinese hammer drill releases 1 to 7 J of energy with each strike. That is, to equal one hammer drill strike, 10,000,000,000,000 antiprotons are needed, and here there are only 100 of them.
        1. +3
          27 March 2026 00: 55
          Will the helmets in the photo help against them? Or is this just another PR stunt?
          1. +3
            27 March 2026 07: 35
            It's called production culture. You can't get into the shop floor without a helmet either.
        2. +1
          27 March 2026 14: 04
          No, measuring this energy in tons would be more accurate.
    2. +8
      26 March 2026 21: 48
      Quote: Neo-9947
      As a military man, I immediately have a question:
      1 Mt of TNT - how many of these antiprotons are needed?
      And what are the damaging factors?


      "Annihilation weapons[1][2][3] are hypothetically possible weapons of mass destruction, the action of which is based on the process of annihilation (mutual destruction) of particles and antiparticles, that is, matter and antimatter, during which a huge amount of energy is released. The most powerful weapon that can theoretically be created, since the collision of matter and antimatter releases energy equal to the total mass of both, the value of which is at least two orders of magnitude greater than the energy released in the most effective thermonuclear weapons - 100% compared to 0,4-1%[4]. When antimatter collides with matter, their mutual annihilation occurs, during which absolutely equal masses of antimatter and matter are converted into pure energy. In As a result of this process, the entire mass-energy of matter and antimatter is released, which for 1 gram is ~9×1013 Joules, while the equivalent of 1 kiloton of TNT = 4,184×1012 Joules (or 1 trillion calories of energy). The reaction of 0,5 grams of antimatter with 0,5 grams of ordinary matter (total mass = 1 gram) will yield 21,5 kilotons of energy equivalent, which is equal to the energy of the atomic bomb dropped on Nagasaki in 1945.[5]Hypothetical an annihilation bomb weighing 1 ton will produce 21,5 thousand megatons of energy, what is more than power all atomic bombs on Earth combined[6]."

      The only problem is the staggering cost of antimatter, which is estimated at US$6 billion for every 100 nanograms, the very small amount of antimatter produced, as well as the lack of reliable technologies for its containment,
      1. +8
        26 March 2026 22: 02
        It is clear that to obtain "Little One" you need 1 gram, i.e. approximately 10 to the power of 24 protons and antiprotons.
        And we only have 92 of them in this van. That's not even an instrumental error, compared to the required 10 to the power of 24.
        In short, keep up the good work, academics.
        1. +2
          27 March 2026 06: 24
          Quote: Neo-9947
          In short, keep up the good work, academics.

          As V.S. Vysotsky sang: "Oh, you'll get enough, oh, you'll get enough..." laughing
      2. +3
        26 March 2026 22: 07
        Quote: your1970
        An annihilation bomb weighing 1 ton would produce 21,5 megatons of energy.

        You're starting early here, there's still a week to go.
        1. +1
          27 March 2026 05: 45
          Quote: poquello
          Quote: your1970
          An annihilation bomb weighing 1 ton would produce 21,5 megatons of energy.

          You're starting early here, there's still a week to go.

          It's not me - it's Vicky belay I didn't even remove the links - so it would be clear where they came from
      3. 0
        26 March 2026 23: 30
        The only problem is the exorbitant cost of antimatter.
        Well, yes, unlike uranium or plutonium, it can't be mined in nature or obtained from another substance. It must be created from scratch, expending equivalent energy. Not very economical in principle. But if you need to cram a lot of energy into a small volume and mass, the technology could be useful. For example, as fuel for an interstellar spacecraft. As a weapon, it doesn't seem to have many advantages; it's much easier to make a bunch of regular bombs.
        1. +3
          26 March 2026 23: 48
          As a weapon, there are plenty of advantages. If we use annihilation reactions without neutron emission, there will be no residual radiation despite the enormous power of the explosion. Furthermore, annihilation weapons lack the concept of "critical mass." That is, if we hypothetical With technological development, 0,05 grams of antimatter will require 10 grams of storage equipment. The dream of every saboteur in the world will come true—hiding a nuclear bomb in your pocket, carrying it, and detonating it. Although I don't know if such a ratio is physically possible.
          1. +1
            27 March 2026 00: 44
            Furthermore, annihilation weapons lack the concept of “critical mass.”

            Well, thermonuclear is also deprived of it, if you don’t count the “fuse”.
            1. +1
              27 March 2026 00: 48
              Well, by the way, you can use a fuse to make antimatter.
              1. +2
                27 March 2026 01: 29
                Well, by the way, you can use a fuse to make antimatter.

                It's probably possible, but I'm afraid to think what they'll use to deliver that "fuse" if they're currently transporting 100 antiprotons in trucks. laughing laughing
                1. +1
                  27 March 2026 13: 56
                  I think this is almost a question of engineering, not physics. So, don't worry—we'll see annihilation fuses again. wink
          2. 0
            27 March 2026 06: 20
            The dream of all the world's saboteurs will come true - to hide a nuclear bomb in your pocket, carry it in and detonate it.

            Just about here!
            This was already shown in the movie "Angels and Demons".
          3. 0
            27 March 2026 13: 05
            Quote: Plate
            If we use annihilation reactions without neutron emission, there will be no residual radiation despite the enormous power of the explosion.

            There will be enormous induced radiation in the irradiated objects. There won't be any residual fissile material, but in modern bombs, it mostly burns up anyway.
            That is, if, with the hypothetical development of technology, we would need 10 grams of storage equipment for 0,05 grams of antimatter, the dream of all the world's saboteurs would come true - to hide a nuclear bomb in their pocket, carry it in, and detonate it.

            This is still very hypothetical. Isotopes with small critical masses already exist. But the price is enormous. And with proper organization, a full-scale warhead could be smuggled in; no country is isolated from trade.
            1. 0
              27 March 2026 14: 00
              Quote: Naked Man
              There will be enormous induced radiation in irradiated objects.

              But isn't neutron radiation the best at leaving induced radiation? Nuclear reactions from other types of radiation might occur, but it seems much more difficult for them to do so. Or have I forgotten my high school physics lessons?
              Quote: Naked Man
              This is still very hypothetical.

              Very, very much. I'm not arguing. It's just a flight of fancy.
              1. +3
                27 March 2026 14: 27
                Some nuclear reactions from other types of radiation can occur, but it seems to be much more difficult for them to do so.

                Photonuclear ones. Which usually generate secondary neutron radiation. Which
                best at leaving behind induced radiation
                .
                Or have I forgotten my school physics?

                As far as I remember, they don't teach us about these reactions at school, so everything is fine.
                1. 0
                  27 March 2026 15: 10
                  Oh wow. Thank you, I'll read about it.
        2. 0
          28 March 2026 07: 30
          it cannot be obtained in nature

          Positrons - antielectrons were discovered in 1932 during the study of cosmic radiation.
          Antiprotons were artificially produced using accelerators in 1955.
          Antihydrogen was synthesized and trapped at CERN in 2010.

          "Creation of Positrons by Cosmic Rays" JETP Letters, Vol. 120, Issue 2, pp. 79–82 © 2024 http://jetpletters.ru/ps/2477/article_36348.pdf

          Fluxes of isotopes of light antinuclei in primary cosmic rays
          https://openrepository.mephi.ru/entities/publication/af9bd3c7-19d8-45c5-af33-8bbc1e37b5ca

          sciencepop
          Antihydrogen: A New Era of Antimatter Experiments Science and Life, No. 1, 2017
      4. +1
        27 March 2026 07: 26
        Annihilation weapons[1][2][3] are hypothetically possible weapons of mass destruction, the action of which is based on the process of annihilation (mutual destruction) of particles and antiparticles, that is, matter and antimatter, which releases a huge amount of energy. The most powerful weapon that can theoretically be created

        You forgot about subatomic particles; when they interact, much more energy is released!
      5. 0
        27 March 2026 19: 30
        The most powerful weapon that could theoretically be created, since the collision of matter and antimatter releases energy equal to the combined mass of both, a value that is at least two orders of magnitude greater than the energy released in the most effective thermonuclear weapon—100% compared to 0,4–1%[4].


        Well, 100% is also a theoretical value, valid for laboratories where only individual antiparticles are annihilated. What would happen if a gram of antimatter were to be annihilated, or what fraction would actually react, is unknown. Annihilation is never observed in nature, so all this is purely speculative.
    3. +2
      26 March 2026 21: 56
      1,8 × 10¹⁴ joules is the amount of energy released during the annihilation of 1 gram of antimatter with 1 gram of matter.
      This is equivalent to approximately 47 kilotons of trinitrotoluene.
      1 gram of antihydrogen contains 6,022×10^23 antiprotons.
      According to CERN physicists, the cost of a gram of antihydrogen is $62,5 trillion...
      Exorbitantly expensive...
      Damaging factors - gamma radiation.
      hi
      1. +1
        26 March 2026 23: 47
        Quote: AlexTss
        Damaging factors - gamma radiation.

        That's interesting.
        What does it look like?
        That is, there will be no shock wave, no light radiation, no 200 dB roar like from an atomic bomb... And the human eye does not see gamma rays at all...
        Everything will be quiet and calm. But everything living within a certain radius of the "explosion" will die...?
        1. +5
          27 March 2026 01: 13
          Interesting. What does it look like?

          And also like atomic and thermonuclear explosions.

          That is, there will be no shock wave, no light radiation, no 200 dB roar like from an atomic bomb...

          All this will be in the best possible way! laughing

          And the human eye does not see gamma rays at all....

          He will not see gamma rays, but the effect caused by them.
          The instantaneous release of a colossal amount of energy in a small volume heats the surrounding air and vaporizes the munition's materials to temperatures of tens and hundreds of thousands of degrees. A plasma ball is created, initially hotter than the surface of the Sun. It emits powerful radiation across a broad spectrum, including visible light, ultraviolet, and X-rays. Then a shock wave ensues...

          Everything will be quiet and calm. But everything living within a certain radius of the "explosion" will die...?

          He will die, but, as we can see, it won't happen quietly and calmly.
    4. +1
      26 March 2026 22: 56
      "And when the carriage rolled up, then there were seven hundred of us per snout!" (c)
      "transporting antimatter by truck" - laughing laughing laughing laughing
      I think you need more than a liter per snout! laughing laughing fellow
    5. 0
      27 March 2026 01: 56
      A more interesting way to pose the question is this: if the chamber's magnetic coils are deprived of power, will the human eye notice any flash of light when the antiprotons hit the chamber wall (even simultaneously)? This assumes the chamber walls are transparent. My intuition tells me that 1) the question is too complex to answer definitively, and 2) the eye won't see anything, most likely for a number of reasons, such as not a single photon hitting the eye.
      If you fired all these antiprotons directly into the eye, the retina would catch something. Of course, the eye wouldn't be harmed in the least.
  2. +5
    26 March 2026 21: 43
    Antimatter... science fiction writers have done their best, they have hyped the value of this phenomenon to the skies!
    Scientists... for now, everything is in the experimental, theoretical stage, and, in short, they are following...
    1. +5
      26 March 2026 21: 46
      Everything we use now was also once a theory, and then experiments.
    2. 0
      26 March 2026 22: 13
      Quote: rocket757
      Antimatter... science fiction writers have done their best, they have hyped the value of this phenomenon to the skies!
      Scientists... for now, everything is in the experimental, theoretical stage, and, in short, they are following...

      The calendar at CERN seems to have shifted, or they've gone crazy
      1. +1
        26 March 2026 22: 34
        Scientists are working on a topic that has long-term implications, so...
        But I really want fame, recognition and, of course, funding!
        So, it all makes sense... if there are no events, they need to be created.
  3. + 17
    26 March 2026 21: 55
    And somewhere in the anti-universe, anti-scientists have synthesized 92 protons and are transporting them in an anti-car.
    1. 0
      26 March 2026 22: 15
      Quote: Michael
      And somewhere in the anti-universe, anti-scientists have synthesized 92 protons and are transporting them in an anti-car.

      which, when interacting with the car, turns into clean energy
      1. 0
        26 March 2026 22: 35
        Scientists managed to collect a cloud of 92 antiprotons in an innovative portable cryogenic Penning trap, then detach it from the experimental setup, load it into a van, and, after transporting and unloading the antimatter, continue experiments with it.

        If our scientists succeeded, then why are anti-scientists turning into ashes of "clean energy"?
      2. +2
        26 March 2026 22: 38
        Quote: poquello
        which, when interacting with the car, turns into clean energy

        In the Northern Military District, fighters often launch armored vehicles or cars packed with explosives at Ukrainian Armed Forces positions! They even designed a remote control system for these "devices"! So... the report of a car carrying antimatter gave me a "vague concern"! belay
        1. +1
          26 March 2026 23: 07
          Quote: Nikolaevich I
          The news about the antimatter car made me feel "vaguely uneasy"!

          Are you worried about CERN? The worst that can happen is the antiprotons will turn sour.
    2. 0
      27 March 2026 02: 01
      Antiprotons are best transported by air, using antidrones.
  4. +1
    26 March 2026 22: 07
    Give scientists free rein and they'll blow up the planet...
    1. +2
      26 March 2026 22: 28
      Quote: Vladislav Minchenko
      Give scientists free rein and they will blow up the planet.

      What do we need a planet for when the universe is our home? As Tsiolkovsky once said, I think! what fool
    2. +1
      26 March 2026 23: 03
      Quote: Vladislav Minchenko
      Give scientists free rein and they'll blow up the planet.

      By the way, there are fantasy stories set in another universe, in parallel worlds... on planets where there's no uranium and nuclear weapons are impossible! What did you think? That "peace and earthly grace" reign there? You guessed it! Thermonuclear ("hydrogen") weapons exist there, without plutonium "fuzes" and therefore cumbersome... but they exist! Bunkers-thermonuclear "land mines", "hydrogen" bombs in the "form" of a heavy bomber or a 40-ton container! belay And in other fantasies, the role of "hydrogen" weapons is played by annihilation bombs! That is, just like in our case... "anti-material" ones! wink Also bulky! But in some works...not "very"!
    3. +1
      26 March 2026 23: 49
      What a stupid opinion you have about scientists. Where did this come from?
  5. 0
    26 March 2026 22: 25
    Let's buy a dozen of these trucks and send them to Ukraine in a friendship column. Just like they did in the 14th friendship train to Crimea. wassat
  6. -2
    26 March 2026 22: 40
    The successful transportation of antimatter was carried out using a truck specially equipped for this purpose.

    Yes, yes! I also had an "antimatter" reorganization at that time. Only I was at "Red and White." And the "five-star antimatter" was successfully "translucent" from a 0,5 container into my body. Without any trucks! Only for the sake of the experiment! And not for animal passion! And at the same time, I confirmed the theory of our Dmitry Ivanovich, Mendeleev! - (the solution is insidious!) drinks
    1. -3
      26 March 2026 22: 50
      drinks
      By the way: I know an old man who makes "antimatter." It's not 5 stars, of course, but it's not bad either! If anyone needs it, just ask. It's only 300 rubles for 0,5 "antimatter." I guarantee you won't have a headache in the morning! drinks
      1. 0
        26 March 2026 23: 08
        By the way: We are recruiting for a bankruptcy trustee to organize the transportation of a batch of black holes. Pay upon completion. Benefits package. Bonuses. Vaccination records required.
  7. 0
    26 March 2026 23: 21
    I wonder how much diesel fuel was needed to transport those 92 antiprotons? They could have given some to the farmers; they're busy with planting...
  8. 0
    26 March 2026 23: 26
    crooks and parasites..., or rather grant-eaters...
    1. +2
      26 March 2026 23: 51
      What? The result is quite impressive, unless I missed some other news. They previously reported that antimatter can't be contained even in stationary traps for long, but here it is – it can be transported. Why are they scammers?
  9. +1
    27 March 2026 00: 02
    Antimatter is not antimatter, don't confuse it. There's no such thing as a "bunch of protons." It's simply a few antiparticles.
  10. +1
    27 March 2026 01: 17
    For the first time in history, antimatter was transported by truck.
    Are they already transporting it in trucks?
    Bravo!!
  11. +2
    27 March 2026 02: 57
    Experiment not just complex, but also dangerous taking into account that antimatter is very difficult to store, since it annihilates upon contact with “ordinary” matter, which leads to a powerful explosion.

    "❝ ― Such experiments, dear Alexander Sergeevich, should be done only with the permission of the relevant authorities! ❞
    🎬 Ivan Vasilyevich is changing professions 🔗 https://citaty.info/quote/554479"
    1. +4
      27 March 2026 07: 34
      "❝ ― Such experiments, dear Alexander Sergeevich, should be done only with the permission of the relevant authorities! ❞

      They put on helmets wassat What else are you missing? wassat
  12. log
    +2
    27 March 2026 04: 45
    What's typical in the comments? The first thought is: what kind of weapon will this be, the yield in kilotons. Oh, people...
  13. 0
    27 March 2026 05: 16
    Or maybe there weren't any antiprotons in the truck? Everyone needs grants, even inspectors, and the emperor had no clothes.
  14. +1
    27 March 2026 07: 22
    Spanish shame. The headline sounds like it belongs in a highly developed civilization, but in reality... Who's responsible for allowing such information to be published? Shame. No.
    Something like a gravity bomb belay
  15. 0
    27 March 2026 08: 34
    To the author. I tried to imagine how much energy would be released and convert it into TNT equivalent. The result didn't impress me. Maybe I missed a few zeros somewhere? :)
    Give an example of your calculations. Maybe someone else can share their clever thoughts?
  16. +2
    27 March 2026 11: 44
    "But the explosion is not as terrible as the loss of precious samples that scientists have been literally collecting atom by atom for years."
    Collecting antiprotons atom by atom? Funny.
  17. +1
    28 March 2026 04: 54
    The article was published a little earlier. The planned deadline was April 1st.