How dangerous are Iranian submarines?

17 096 62
How dangerous are Iranian submarines?

Iranian submarine Fateh


Against the background of the exchange missile Despite the Gulf War and the blockade of the Strait of Hormuz, the actions of Iran's submarines and the role they might have played in this conflict remain virtually unknown to the media. Only highly contradictory reports have emerged about the sinking of either two, or all (!) Iranian submarines by the mighty "Uncle Sam" on March 3, 2026. The absence of Iranian submarines at the naval base in Bandar Abbas in satellite images was considered "compelling" evidence of this. The images of their destruction, presented by the American CENTCOM, are indecipherable.



Deployment of ships at the Bandar Abbas naval base on February 25, 2026.

The Islamic Republic of Iran has both a naval force and a naval force. fleet (NEDAJA) and the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (NEDSA), with the Navy's areas of responsibility being the Caspian Sea and areas beyond the Strait of Hormuz—the Gulf of Oman and the Indian Ocean—while the IRGC's naval forces operate in the Persian Gulf. Submarines are also used by the Takavaran unit, a special forces unit of the Islamic Republic of Iran's Navy, which is part of the Navy's Marine Corps.




Flag of the Iranian Navy


IRGC flag

Iran made its first attempts to acquire submarines during the Shah's reign. In the mid-1970s, a contract was signed with the United States for three Tang-class submarines, and training for future Iranian submariners began in the United States. In December 1978, the first submarine, USS Trout (SS-566), named Kooseh, was delivered to Iran at a cost of $26,650,000. However, the Islamic Revolution took place in Iran, and the new government refused to accept the submarine. A similar fate befell the order for six Type 209 submarines from West Germany.


USS Trout

Ten years later, the government of the Islamic Republic of Iran finally decided to acquire submarines, choosing the USSR as their supplier, despite protests and opposition from the United States.

In 1990-1991, the USSR and Iran signed agreements for the construction of six Project 877EKM diesel-electric submarines (classified in the West as the Kilo-class), the supply of weapons, and technical assistance in establishing six submarine shore bases in Bandar Abbas. The total value of the contracts was $1,6 billion. However, under pressure from Washington, Moscow obediently tucked its tail between its legs, Russian-Iranian military-technical cooperation was curtailed, and the agreements were never fully implemented.

The construction of the submarines for Iran was carried out in St. Petersburg at the Admiralty Shipyards. The cost of the three submarines is estimated at $750 million. Iranian crews were trained in Riga. The speed of submarine construction is impressive. The first submarine ordered by Iran was laid down on April 5, 1991, launched on September 24, 1991, and transferred to Ust-Dvinsk (Riga) in October, where the acceptance certificate was signed on December 25, 1991. In November 1992, the submarine arrived in Bandar Abbas, where it was delivered to the customer on November 21, receiving the name 901 "Tareq."

In 1993 and 1997, two more Varshavyanka-class submarines, built at the Admiralty Shipyards – 902 "Noor" and 903 "Yunes" – arrived in Bandar Abbas. Iran also purchased 1800 submarine-launched naval mines from Russia, allowing the Iranians to close off access to the Strait of Hormuz.


Submarine Project 877

Iran's Varshavyanka-class submarines regularly participated in exercises in the Persian Gulf, the Gulf of Oman, and the Strait of Hormuz. For example, in the spring of 1998, all three submarines participated in the Ettihad naval exercise, which was intended to demonstrate Iran's ability to close access to the gulf. They also periodically conducted longer missions to the Indian Ocean and the Red Sea. In the summer of 2011, the Yunes submarine conducted a 67-day patrol in the Gulf of Aden and the Red Sea, setting a national record for the longest mission.

However, the technical condition of the submarines steadily deteriorated. This was due to both the harsh environmental conditions—high temperatures and salinity of the seawater—and the lack of original spare parts. Due to the imposition of international sanctions by the UN Security Council in late 2006, the Iranian Navy experienced problems with the supply of spare parts, as well as with the necessary maintenance and repairs on these submarines. Repairs at domestic shipyards were only partially able to maintain proper technical condition.

In 2020-2021, all submarines entered the Bandar Abbas shipyard for major repairs and modernization, which would also enable the use of cruise missiles. By the summer of 2025, at least one of the submarines had been restored to combat readiness. This is evidenced by a report by the Iranian news agency IRNA that on the night of June 14, 2025, during the so-called "Twelve Day War," it launched missiles from the Persian Gulf at targets in Israel.

On March 3, 2026, the United States launched a missile strike on the naval base in Bandar Abbas and reported the destruction of one of the Varshavyanka-class submarines. However, Iran denies this. Most likely, the missiles hit a landing stage near the submarine, and the submarine suffered only minor damage.

Beginning in the late 1980s, Iran began developing small submarines, both independently and likely with the assistance of North Korean specialists. According to several foreign media reports, between 1988 and 1993, North Korea transferred nine small submarines with a submerged displacement of approximately 90 tons to Iran. Iran also acquired another interesting development by North Korean engineers: the Taedong B, a hybrid of a torpedo-armed high-speed boat and a midget submarine. Two Korean Taedong B submarines were delivered to Iran in 2002, and were subsequently produced independently under the name Zulficar. They are in service with the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps and their primary purpose is to land reconnaissance and sabotage teams.


“Taedong B” - “Zulficar”

In February 2004, the first reports emerged of Iran's development of a domestic minisubmarine, the Ghadir. Naturally, the performance characteristics are classified, so the data provided are approximate. Its surface/submerged displacement is 117/125 tons, speed is 10/8 knots, and the crew, according to various sources, ranges from 7 to 18. Its armament consists of two 533-mm torpedo tubes designed to fire various types of torpedoes, including the Hoot missile torpedo (similar to the Russian Shkval), cruise missiles, and mine-laying. The boats can also be used to land combat divers.

According to incomplete data, at least 21 submarines of this type entered service between 2005 and 2022.

Despite their small size, the Ghadir-class ships are capable of undertaking relatively long voyages. For example, Ghadir 953 called at the Pakistani port of Karachi in May 2014. According to Iranian media reports, four to five Ghadir-class ships were constantly patrolling the approaches to the Strait of Hormuz.

According to the IRGC Navy commander, missile strikes against coastal targets were carried out during the current Gulf War. It's possible that these were the "Ghadir" attacks.





Ghadir-class submarines

In the spring of 2006, information first surfaced about the construction of the Nahang mini-submarine in Iran. Details about this boat are extremely scarce; it is believed to be primarily designed to support underwater special forces and minelaying, although it is possible that it could also be armed with two 533mm torpedoes.


Model submarine "Nahang"

Between 2013 and 2019, the larger submarine "Fateh" entered service. Three more submarines of the same type are under construction. Media estimates of the submarine's displacement are 530/600 tons, speed 11/14 knots, snorkel range 3600 miles (at 8 knots), and diving depth 200-250 meters. Armament consists of four 533-mm torpedo tubes (six torpedoes or cruise missiles, or eight mines).






Submarine "Fateh"

In 2024, at the DIMDEX 2024 exhibition in Doha, a model of the Fateh-class submarine with a Stirling air-independent propulsion plant developed by Malek Ashtar University of Technology (MUT) was presented.


Model of the “Fateh” type submarine with a VNEU

According to US CENTCOM, on March 3, 2026, during Operation Epic Fury, the “Fateh” was sunk as a result of a missile strike.

Iran is currently constructing a large submarine, the Besat, with a submerged displacement of 2000-3000 tons and an air-independent propulsion system (AIP) powered by fuel cells. Its armament is expected to consist of six torpedo tubes, which will also allow it to fire cruise missiles at sea and shore targets.


Model submarine "Besat"

There are also reports that Iran was also planning to build a nuclear-powered submarine. Back in December 2016, Iranian President Hassan Rouhani ordered his designers to begin work on a nuclear submarine. However, given the current situation, this is unlikely to happen in the foreseeable future.

To support the activities of combat swimmers, Iran operates light diver transporters, such as the two-seat Al Sabehat 15. And in 2020, the IRGC unveiled another new development: a large underwater Drone with the diesel-electric power plant "Nazir-1". Later, its improved versions were also demonstrated. The length of this submarine drone is about 9,1 m, diameter - 1,8 m, diving depth - 200 m, cruising range - 270 miles, underwater autonomy - up to 24 hours.


Al Sabehat 15 light diver transporter




Underwater drone with diesel-electric power plant "Nazir-1"

Iran's interest in small submarines is driven not only by their relative simplicity and low cost, but also by the unique hydrography and hydrology of the Persian Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz. Their average depth is only about 35 meters, and the maximum (at the mouth of the Strait of Hormuz) is 102 meters. The gulf is rich in islands, sandbanks, and coral reefs. I remember being on a gas carrier loading at Ras Tanura—a ten-hour voyage through a narrow shipping channel dug into a sandbank.


The depths of the Persian Gulf

All this makes the use of large submarines here virtually impossible. However, the large temperature and salinity fluctuations, shallow depths, and sand and organic suspended matter in the seawater contribute to hydroacoustic stealth.

Using torpedoes, missiles and mines weaponIranian submarines are capable of effectively blocking access to the Persian Gulf through Hormuz. After all, its narrowest point is only 54 kilometers and is divided into two transport channels, each approximately 2,5 kilometers wide, separated by a 5-kilometer buffer zone.


Shipping routes in the Strait of Hormuz

The Iranian Navy operates torpedoes of Russian, North Korean, and domestic manufacture. The latter includes the 533mm YT-534-UW1 "Valfajr" wake-homing torpedo, which carries a 220-250 kg explosive charge. Serial production began in 2015. Its prototype is presumably the North Korean PT-97W torpedo.


YT-534-UW2 “Valfajr” torpedoes

Iranian sailors may also use the Khut-class high-speed underwater missile/supercavitating torpedo, which was developed since the early 2000s. It achieves speeds of 320-360 km/h by propelling the torpedo through a gas cavity. It is likely a derivative of the Soviet B-111 Shkval torpedo, which entered service with the Soviet Navy in 1977.

The Shkval is equipped with a rocket engine powered by a solid fuel that reacts with seawater. The torpedo's serious drawbacks include its high noise level, which can reveal the submarine's camouflage, its short effective range (7 km), and the lack of a homing system.



Torpedo "Khut"

Iran also operates the 533mm "Ajdar" torpedo. Its lithium-ion battery allows it to travel at cruising speed for up to 96 hours over a distance of over 320 miles, or at a speed of 22-25 knots for a distance of up to 70 miles.
Iran's submarines are also designed to lay mines of both foreign and domestic manufacture. Examples include: a torpedo-based self-transporting bottom mine with a range of approximately 20 km and a 320 kg explosive charge; the Maham-2 bottom mine with a similar charge; and others. All of these mines are equipped with multi-channel detonators (magnetic, acoustic, and hydrodynamic), and multiplicity and timing devices.


Iranian naval self-propelled mine


Maham-2 naval mine

According to media reports, Iran also has Chinese-made EM-52 rocket-propelled proximity mines, also known as the Te-1. Each mine is 3,7 meters long, 0,45 meters in diameter, weighs 629 kg, and contains 140 kg of explosive. It can be deployed at depths of up to 200 meters. It is equipped with magnetic, acoustic, and hydrodynamic sensors and can monitor a 3-kilometer radius. Upon detecting a target, the mine floats toward it at a speed of up to 80 m/s and can hit targets within a radius of up to 300 meters.


EM-52 mine


Loading an EM-52 mine into a torpedo tube


Launch of a Jask-2 cruise missile from a Ghadir-class submarine

The boats can use cruise missiles, such as anti-ship missiles such as the Jask-2 or Nasr-1 with a range of up to 35 km, Noor with a range of up to 120 km, Qader (300 km, can also be used against ground targets), as well as long-range cruise missiles for firing at ground targets.
62 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    26 March 2026 04: 46
    We might as well discuss the "capabilities" of Iran's air force and its air defense systems. All these contraptions are on par with the Kaiten, with similar effectiveness.
    1. +5
      26 March 2026 05: 38
      If used correctly, it can cause trouble.
      1. -2
        26 March 2026 08: 54
        Quote: Micha1981
        If used correctly, it can cause trouble.

        "Reasonable use" and Iran are incompatible concepts.
        1. +2
          26 March 2026 09: 09
          Well, well, where do you come to such conclusions?
          1. +1
            26 March 2026 09: 33
            Quote: Micha1981
            Well, well, where do you come to such conclusions?

            Don't you follow the news? Here's a summary from yesterday:
            Iran has launched seven waves of missiles at Israel since the last time CTP-ISW data was cut off. Six of the seven waves reportedly included only one missile, which was intercepted by the Israel Defense Forces.

            You're planning a missile strike against an enemy with interceptor capabilities. Your resources are limited, so you:
            1. Launch six missiles so that they approach ONE target simultaneously, thereby overloading the air defense and increasing the likelihood of the missile breaking through to the target;
            2. Launch them at different targets at intervals of several hours, allowing the missile defense system to prepare for the next interception and loading only one defense sector.
            And which option do you think is "competent"?
            1. +3
              26 March 2026 10: 01
              A moot point. We need to determine what percentage of missiles are actually intercepted.
              How many missiles were there in total in these waves? Calculate the number of intercepted missiles, and you will find out the percentage of intercepted missiles, which I can say is most likely constant.
              And it’s easy to think on the couch, what ranks do you hold?
              I wouldn't be surprised if most of the salvoes fired at airfields were an attempt to catch their planes.
              1. -2
                26 March 2026 10: 10
                Quote: Micha1981
                Controversial moment.

                There's nothing controversial. Let me repeat the question: which option do you consider more correct?
                Quote: Micha1981
                How many missiles were there in total in these waves, calculate one intercepted

                You don't understand the text? Of the seven missile attacks on March 25, six were single-missile salvos, all intercepted (not surprisingly), meaning six attacks and six missiles. Is that clear?
                Quote: Micha1981
                And it’s easy to think on the couch, what ranks do you hold?

                Do you need titles for simple things?
                Quote: Micha1981
                I wouldn't be surprised if most of the salvoes fired at airfields were an attempt to catch their planes.

                How did you come to this conclusion? Let's say space reconnaissance detected an aircraft taking off from an airfield. By the time this information reaches the command post and the missile reaches its target, all the aircraft would already be in Iranian airspace (receive the information, transmit the target coordinates to the crew, enter the data into the missile, move the transporter with the missile from its camouflaged shelter into position, lift the missile, launch, and fly to the target).
                Your assumption is an example of "illiterate actions".
                Now regarding airfields and aircraft. The US Air Force is stationed at two airfields in Jordan, where F-35s and F-15Es are based, from where they launch airstrikes against Iran. Iran is NOT attacking Jordan.
                1. +4
                  26 March 2026 10: 18
                  I just know the whole situation, you could say how literate I am.
                  And who told you that all six missiles were intercepted, did you see it yourself?
                  We need to get to the bottom of things, because everyone is on the couch and thinks they are strategists.
                  Just at the airfield, there are planes.
                  And speaking of missile interceptions, last year an Israeli citizen popped up on a forum and started to argue, but he himself posted a spreadsheet showing that around 620 targets were recorded over 12 days, broken down by day and time interval, and 37 or 38 were reliably destroyed. So, do the math. That's how many missiles are actually shot down, so single missiles aren't that unreasonable.
                  1. -1
                    26 March 2026 10: 23
                    Quote: Micha1981
                    I just know the whole situation, you could say how literate I am.

                    In short, you've decided to disappear into thin air. You've been presented with two options, and you're evading a simple question. If it's too complicated for you, I'll ask you a much simpler one. Why isn't Iran striking US airfields in Jordan? They're much closer than airfields in Israel.
                    1. +2
                      26 March 2026 10: 27
                      There's no escape. The multiple-missile option seems more reasonable, but we don't know how many missiles were actually shot down. That's why I'm avoiding the question.
                      Do you believe that Israel shot down 92 percent of the 400 missiles?
                      And who told you that it doesn’t cause any harm? Maybe it does. The question is what the effect will be.
                      1. +1
                        26 March 2026 11: 15
                        Quote: Micha1981
                        but we don't know how many missiles were actually shot down.

                        The number of missiles launched is being tracked by the countries targeted. For example, Kuwait's missile defense system yesterday counted 20 missiles and nine UAVs launched at them. No other Middle East country recorded missile launches against itself.
                        Quote: Micha1981
                        Do you believe that Israel shot down 92 percent of the 400 missiles?

                        You are referring me to an unexplored question, who made the statement and when is unknown to me and I cannot give an answer to this.
                        Quote: Micha1981
                        And who told you that it doesn’t cause any harm? Maybe it does. The question is what the effect will be.

                        Iran attacked Jordan in the first days, but that was all. All the countries attacked are speaking out about it, for no reason. Neither Iran nor Jordan has announced any attacks on Jordan. Iran regularly threatens the Persian Gulf countries by name, but not a word about Jordan. You're back to the realm of "maybe..." and "they're hiding the truth from us..."
                      2. +2
                        26 March 2026 11: 21
                        It's hard to say how many of them there actually are.
                        Therefore, it is not worth claiming that Israel shot down the planes; perhaps individual planes pass easily and are not shot down.
                        The question is, maybe they don’t fly from it anymore, there were enough of those strikes.
                      3. -4
                        26 March 2026 11: 23
                        Quote: Micha1981
                        It's hard to say.

                        Quote: Micha1981
                        claim that

                        Quote: Micha1981
                        can

                        Did you answer the same way at the registry office?
                      4. +2
                        26 March 2026 11: 26
                        What does this have to do with it? Kuwait's missile defense system detected targets, but can you say how many of them are real?
                        Do you have real data on how many missiles are actually shot down?
                        Are there flights to Iran from the base in Jordan now?
                      5. 0
                        27 March 2026 03: 00
                        Quote: Micha1981
                        And what does it have to do with it?

                        Since you operate with feelings and not facts, you begin to envelop any presented fact with words and doubts because you are afraid to admit that everything is not working out the way you want.
                      6. +1
                        27 March 2026 05: 05
                        In fact, the reasons are simply unknown. There are several options. You're pushing one.
                      7. -1
                        27 March 2026 05: 17
                        Quote: Micha1981
                        In fact, the reasons are simply unknown. There are several options. You're pushing one.

                        Let me repeat, you're incapable of putting aside your personal sympathies for either side of the war, not realizing that this prevents you from drawing the right conclusion. I'm sure you believed in Maduro and Assad until the very end.
                      8. +1
                        27 March 2026 05: 35
                        I don't care about Maduro. I didn't believe in Assad, although his rapid fall was surprising.
                        And things are going well for the Iranians, so far.
                        But you obviously have a good time in the Chamber with Napoleon.
                      9. 0
                        27 March 2026 06: 30
                        Quote: Micha1981
                        And things are going well for the Iranians, so far.
                        But you obviously have a good time in the Chamber with Napoleon.

                        You are simply confirming my words.
                      10. +1
                        27 March 2026 06: 36
                        These are your words, and you are nobody. What surprises me more is the US's lack of preparation.
                  2. +3
                    26 March 2026 18: 45
                    We need to get to the bottom of things, because everyone is on the couch and thinks they are strategists.

                    Why bother? It's clear that Iranians are stupid. The whole of Iran is less intelligent than a jack or, say, a hole punch. Anyway, don't argue.
                    1. +2
                      26 March 2026 18: 48
                      But for us, everyone is a Napoleon.
                      1. +3
                        26 March 2026 18: 51
                        But for us, everyone is a Napoleon.

                        And every other hole punch.))
                      2. +2
                        26 March 2026 19: 08
                        Suvorov or Kutuzov, or maybe even Genghis Khan.
                2. +5
                  26 March 2026 11: 33
                  You don't understand the text? Of the seven missile attacks on March 25, six involved a single missile salvo.

                  Yeah, "one rocket salvo" good
                  Censorship in the IDF is scorching…
                  1. -2
                    27 March 2026 03: 02
                    Quote: Kote pane Kohanka
                    Yeah, "one rocket salvo"
                    Censorship in the IDF is scorching…

                    Denial, then anger?
                    1. +1
                      27 March 2026 07: 02
                      Quote: Puncher
                      Quote: Kote pane Kohanka
                      Yeah, "one rocket salvo"
                      Censorship in the IDF is scorching…

                      Denial, then anger?

                      What does this have to do with...?
                      If we operate with the rules of formal logic “truth - falsehood”, then an unpleasant picture emerges.
                      Of the eight waves (salvos), at least 2 or more missiles, the enemy intercepted 1 missile in each.
                      1. -1
                        27 March 2026 07: 20
                        Quote: Kote pane Kohanka
                        Of the eight waves (salvos), at least 2 or more missiles, the enemy intercepted 1 missile in each.

                        Where does this information come from?
            2. +2
              26 March 2026 15: 00
              The Israeli publication Haaretz stated that 8 out of 10 Iranian missiles hit Israel.

              The reasons are generally clear: Israel's air defense has lost some of its "American radar eyes" and has been operating in austerity mode for over a week.
              1. +1
                26 March 2026 15: 10
                The Israeli publication Haaretz stated that 8 out of 10 Iranian missiles hit Israel.


                Can I get a link to Haaretz? Or is this like the IRGC saying something about the publication saying something?
                1. +3
                  26 March 2026 18: 48
                  What about the statement that 92 percent of the missiles were intercepted?
    2. +2
      26 March 2026 07: 58
      So why did the British use their X-boats in Norway and Singapore?
      1. +4
        26 March 2026 08: 48
        Quote: Grencer81
        So why did the British use their X-boats in Norway and Singapore?

        Swordfish also used shelving units - recommend them to the Iranian wunderwaffe
        1. +2
          26 March 2026 13: 37
          Yeah, and the USSR Air Force also used the U-2. And the Soviet M-type submarines are only slightly larger than Iran's midget submarines.
          1. +2
            26 March 2026 14: 04
            Quote: Grencer81
            Yeah, and the USSR Air Force also used the U-2. And the Soviet M-type submarines are only slightly larger than Iran's midget submarines.

            Yeah, yeah, and recommend the Po-2. Shuvalov's unicorns, an armored train.
            1. +2
              26 March 2026 15: 22
              Armored trains are still used in the Northeastern Military District. Previously, they were used in Chechnya.
              1. -2
                27 March 2026 03: 08
                Quote: Grencer81
                Armored trains are still used in the Northeastern Military District. Previously, they were used in Chechnya.

                Calling this an "armored train" is a stretch. These aren't armored trains, but rather platforms carrying weapons.
                1. -1
                  27 March 2026 04: 00
                  But the locomotive is armored. Although it only protects against bullets and shrapnel.
                  1. -2
                    27 March 2026 05: 14
                    Quote: Grencer81
                    But the locomotive is armored. Although it only protects against bullets and shrapnel.

                    Compared to those classics, these are pale knockoffs. Covering a BMP-2 with railroad ties and passing it off as an armored car is self-deception.
    3. -2
      26 March 2026 19: 34
      The author's desire to "play along" with the warring exporters of the Islamic revolution is understandable, but it has very shaky grounds. The "successes" of the Iranian Navy can be indirectly judged by today's report in Rossiyskaya Gazeta:
      Rear Admiral Alireza Tangsiri, commander of the Iranian Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) navy, was killed in a strike in the southern part of the country, the Israeli newspaper The Jerusalem Post reported.

      The publication claims the incident occurred in the port city of Bandar Abbas, located on the shores of the strategically important Strait of Hormuz. "IRGC Naval Commander Alireza Tangsiri, responsible for closing the Strait of Hormuz, was killed in Bandar Abbas overnight," the publication notes.
  2. +1
    26 March 2026 05: 39
    I am very sorry that our Pirani submarines have been disposed of. These are unique submarines, with lithium batteries and new automation and computers installed. A crew of two, two torpedoes or calibers can cause a stir. am
    1. +7
      26 March 2026 07: 23
      Quote: air wolf
      I am very sorry that our Pirani submarines have been disposed of. These are unique submarines, with lithium batteries and new automation and computers installed. A crew of two, two torpedoes or calibers can cause a stir. am

      They were already making waves in Finland. Kuzmich will not let you lie. laughing
      1. +4
        26 March 2026 07: 42
        The Ghadir boats are impressive, with a small displacement of 117/125 tons, two full-fledged torpedoes, if necessary, the crew can be reduced to 2 people, they may already have lithium-ion batteries, the boat can be transported on a trailer, a good design for shallow straits, bays like the Finnish inland seas
        1. +1
          26 March 2026 22: 01
          Quote: agond
          Ghadir boats make an impression...

          You are an impressionable man! lol
          I propose discussing their combat value in a confrontation with the US Marine Corps landing force. Although, most likely, the Marines will be used to hold the landing beachhead, which will be captured by paratroopers from the 82nd Airborne Division. And the Marines will be airlifted to the beachhead using tiltrotor aircraft...
          So. The submarine's home base (Bandar Abbas) is located inside the Gulf. When deploying to the Gulf, the submarines must transit the strait zone. The Yankees (to isolate the Gulf area) will deploy their own SSGN (most likely based on TAS-TASS) in the narrows. It's an active-passive system, and the narrows will have to be crossed at the PP, depleting the battery capacity. The Ghadir-class submarine's endurance is only 3-5 days, of which 1 day is spent transiting to the Gulf, 24 hours returning, and 3 days in position. However, according to experts (no exact data!), the battery capacity is sufficient for 6-24 hours submerged at 5 knots (economy speed). Most likely, 12 hours, like its ancestor, the North Korean Yogo-class submarine. And then it's time to "burn off the battery charge." Around the world, you can quietly moor to your vessel (in a positional position or in a PP under a snorkel) and, using its "pipe" (BPA's CO2 analyzers detect it immediately!), quietly fire your diesel generator, knocking out the battery. In a war, the Yankees will drive all ships out of the zone or sink them. There will be nowhere to hide (cover).
          Result: a four-day shortage in the submarine compartment. The smart guys suggested pumping O2 into the Dewars and quietly releasing it into the compartment and feeding the propulsion plant. But the problem isn't just oxygen. The main issue is CO2 poisoning. Regeneration units are clearly not enough, and diesel engines don't have an air quality control system (like on submarines).
          Next. Let's assume we've occupied the RBD and found targets to strike. Attack!
          - the longest-range anti-ship missiles are the Nasr-1 (m=350 kg, V=0,8-0,9 M, D=35 km; warhead weight=150 kg) and Jask-2 (D=35 km). Both anti-ship missiles have solid-propellant rocket motors and are fired at the transport launcher from bow torpedo tubes from a depth of up to 10 m. But after the transport launcher surfaces, the missile takes off and makes a "hill" before going to a low altitude. This "hill" is a red flag for the Far Eastern Defense radars and ship-based SAM systems. The submarine's missile system receives its targeting guidance only from its own surveillance equipment (GAS, but judging by its size, it is of the MG-10 type with a D obn up to 10 miles...) Hydrology in shallow water, in the shelf zone, is usually type 4 (with 2 "shadow" zones), and in summer it is generally type -5, when the beam bends under the stern, which makes its own adjustments to the tactics of searching for surface targets using the sonar. Next, you need to launch a torpedo attack: a dash toward the target at the target launch range. But the maximum underwater speed is only 8,0 knots (it won't be possible to stay close to the enemy and leave the anti-ship missile launch range quickly). But there are only two torpedo tubes!!! If you load the anti-ship missiles, you'll be left without a torpedo tube.
          What should we do? My guess is to load mines and place them on the submarine defense system, blocking the strait. We can take up to eight of them. Mines are not only a counter-insurgency weapon, but also a POWERFUL means of psychological warfare against the enemy. Especially since the Yankees don't have a submarine defense force in the Gulf area. That would at least give the submariners some hope of returning to base.
          Actually, you can guess as long as you like, but we'll see how it turns out. In any case, I take my hat off to the guys serving on these little ships. They are real heroes, SHAHIDS.
          1. 0
            27 March 2026 04: 05
            Moreover, the Yankees don't have a TSC in the Bay Area.

            Greetings!
            Incidentally, the US apparently also has a HM-15 mine countermeasure helicopter squadron equipped with MH-53 Sea Dragon mine countermeasure aircraft for this purpose. They could bring them in.
            1. +1
              27 March 2026 08: 08
              Helicopter minesweeper operations are a real pain in the ass!!! When naval minesweeping, you're completely overwhelmed by navigational support: coordination, sextant accuracy, and sweeping swaths that are laughably wide. You also need to ensure overlap, sweep frequency, and so on. Rely on GPS in combat? How many refuelling stations are needed? How many and what kind of minesweepers? And the work (flights) at night... It all sounds good on paper and on video, but in practice, it's a slog! And the time commitment isn't exactly comme il faut either. Our guys spent a year sweeping Chittagong! Under normal (non-firing) conditions. But that was COMBAT minesweeping, because no one told the mines the war was over! laughing
              1. +1
                27 March 2026 08: 25
                I agree, but as a "feint with the ears" performed by the Americans, why not.
                As far as I remember, the Americans used similar helicopters to sweep the Persian Gulf in its northern part during Desert Storm, and the flagship of the mine countermeasure forces there was the UDC Tripoli (LPH-10) of the Iwo Jima type, and it even hit a mine there.
                And considering that the Tripoli UDC is heading to the shores of Iran again, only a more advanced type, it seems ironic, or something.
                1. +1
                  27 March 2026 14: 06
                  Quote: Sanguinius
                  like a "flip flop" performed by Americans

                  Artem, if I were the Persians, I would use combined detonators and staggered settings on the time and frequency devices for this "feint with the ears" (based on the striped ones' anti-mine action forecast template).
                  For example. The duty channel is a hydrofoil, and the combat ones are a pair: magnetic and hydrodynamic. A helicopter certainly won't be able to tow a "barge" to create a pressure differential, and it doesn't have the power. Besides, such mines are "sweeped" by MZM minebreakers with holds full of logs and empty barrels. Seeker-destroyers? Effective in clear water, when the DM can be seen. Besides, an up-to-date map of false contacts is needed...
                  (No, we don’t need this kind of football! (c)). bully
                  So, frog jumps and airmobile infantry! To assist the Marine Corps. Yes, under fire, yes, under cluster bombers, yes, after ODAP-500-1500. Well, so that those who like to bomb other people's cities don't get bored!!! am
          2. -1
            28 March 2026 11: 32
            Meanwhile, the Ohio submarine was blown up by mines there. Telegram's "Military Affairs" article reports on this.
            1. 0
              28 March 2026 22: 03
              Quote: Space Battleship Yamato
              Meanwhile, the Ohio submarine was blown up by mines there. Telegram's "Military Affairs" article reports on this.

              Only fools would spread fake news that's not even close to the truth! They don't even know the approximate location of Gayek's combat patrol areas! Until the "orange alert" (USAF combat patrol) is declared, they're hanging around just outside the combat patrol areas.
              And they're also called "Military Affairs." Utter disgraces! fool
      2. +1
        26 March 2026 07: 57
        But this is just a story! Eh, Kuzmich?
  3. +4
    26 March 2026 07: 52
    The Project 877 submarines are already old and worn out. Ultra-small submarines can only be used in coastal waters.
    1. +1
      26 March 2026 14: 32
      Quote: Grencer81
      Ultra-small submarines can only be used in coastal waters.

      In coastal waters in shallow waters, only they can and should be used.
  4. +2
    26 March 2026 15: 15
    Quote: Puncher
    You're planning a missile strike against an enemy with interceptor capabilities. Your resources are limited, so you:
    1. Launch six missiles so that they approach ONE target simultaneously, thereby overloading the air defense and increasing the likelihood of the missile breaking through to the target;
    2. Launch them at different targets at intervals of several hours, allowing the missile defense system to prepare for the next interception and loading only one defense sector.
    And which option do you think is "competent"?

    If your goal is to keep people in shelters, expend enemy missile defense interceptors, and reveal radars, then it's better to use cheap decoy missiles one at a time.
    The same thing if it uses missiles with a cluster warhead.
    1. -1
      26 March 2026 18: 50
      The question here is how many Iranian missiles were actually shot down.
  5. 0
    26 March 2026 21: 00
    A model of the Fateh-class submarine with a Stirling air-independent propulsion system developed by Malek Ashtar University of Technology (MUT) was presented.


    Even Iran has succeeded in this, unlike our designers, who in 40 years have still not produced an air-independent power plant (AIP).
  6. 0
    26 March 2026 22: 14
    Quote: Puncher
    Quote: Micha1981
    If used correctly, it can cause trouble.

    "Reasonable use" and Iran are incompatible concepts.

    Tell that to the Jews who kicked out an Israeli official who decided to visit the ruins of the city's neighborhoods where the specialists of the Judeo-fascist nuclear center live.
  7. 0
    27 March 2026 00: 24
    From 1986 to 1990, I built Varshavyanka-class submarines at Admiralty. The submarine was already well-established in production; the construction cycle typically took about a year. We launched one every year. Almost everything we built was exported. I remember the Indian Minister of Defense visiting us and reviewing his orders; we were building for Libya and some other projects. I don't remember Iran.
  8. 0
    27 March 2026 13: 28
    Thank you, very informative.
  9. 0
    28 March 2026 11: 32
    Meanwhile, the Ohio submarine was blown up by mines there. Telegram's "Military Affairs" article reports on this.
  10. 0
    28 March 2026 13: 22
    Quote: Boa constrictor KAA

    You are an impressionable man!

    Small submarines simply meet the stealth criteria better than larger ones, and this particular submarine is specialized for operations not in the Indian Ocean, but in the shallow waters of the Persian Gulf, within direct line of sight of its shore. And of course, they don't have a VNEU, but it's highly likely that they've already replaced the traditional batteries with lithium-ion ones. The submarine is small and simple, making it easily upgradeable.
  11. 0
    28 March 2026 17: 45
    We've come to this... Iran can and does make submarines with air-independent propulsion systems, but we still have the pinnacle of development - the 686.3 family of diesel-electric submarines.