The Diego Garcia Air Base Strike: The Means and the Consequences

14 028 34
The Diego Garcia Air Base Strike: The Means and the Consequences
Diego Garcia Island. The airfield and naval base are visible on the left.


Since February 28, Iran has been regularly inflicting missile Strikes against targets of their adversaries and their allies in the Middle East. Furthermore, attempts are being made to expand the geography of such attacks. For example, several days ago, Iran attempted to attack the American military base in Diego Garcia, located on the Chagos Archipelago. This facility was previously believed to be outside the area of ​​responsibility of Iranian missile forces.



P "RІRѕR№RЅRѕR№ SѓRґR ° SЂ


The first reports of an Iranian attack on the Diego Garcia air base appeared on the morning of March 21 local time. news Foreign media outlets published similar reports, and then an official comment came from the US Central Command (US CENTCOM), which is responsible for Operation Epic Fury.

Iran reportedly launched two medium-range ballistic missiles of an unknown model, targeting a US military base in the Chagos Archipelago. Both missiles were reportedly detected by US missile defense systems during their flight.

A US Arleigh Burke-class destroyer, equipped with anti-missile systems, was in the missile flight area. It launched an SM-3 interceptor missile at one of the Iranian IRBMs. The results of this launch were not disclosed, but it is known that the ballistic missile failed to reach its target. The second missile experienced a malfunction in flight and crashed into the ocean.


Khorramshahr is one of Iran's modern IRBMs.

All the details of this "missile battle" remain unknown. The US and Iran, as well as anonymous media sources, are not sharing any intriguing details. Perhaps the situation will soon change, and new data will emerge, clarifying the picture and allowing for further conclusions.

The Iranian attempt to strike a foreign base has attracted increased attention. The minimum distance from Iran's southern coast to the Diego Garcia base exceeds 3800 km. This means that the Iranian armed forces now possess missile systems capable of attacking targets at similar distances.

Priority target


Since the beginning of the current conflict, Iranian forces have been attacking various US and Israeli military installations, including those located in third-party Middle Eastern countries. Moreover, the range of targets for such strikes has steadily expanded, including those of particular interest.

The latest target for Iranian missiles was an American base on a remote archipelago. It could have been attacked for several different reasons, with potential consequences, both military and otherwise.

It's worth remembering that the military base on Diego Garcia Island in the Chagos Archipelago was established in the mid-1960s. The island was then under British control, but was leased to the United States. Various naval and air force facilities were built there.


The Sejil complex is in position

The naval base on the island can accommodate US Navy warships of all classes, including aircraft carriers. Maintenance, cargo transfer, and other services are also possible. The base has a favorable geographic location and allows the Navy to operate freely across a significant portion of the Indian Ocean.

An airfield with a 3-kilometer runway was built. It can accommodate strategic bombers and military transport aircraft of all types. It expands the area of ​​responsibility for long-range airspace. aviation, and the ability to transport troops and cargo is also improved.

Several Space Force facilities operate on Diego Garcia. They provide surveillance of near-Earth space and track various objects. A communications center, various command posts, and other facilities are also known to be present.

Essentially, the Diego Garcia base is a key US military facility in the Indian Ocean region. By attacking this facility, a potential adversary could inflict significant damage on US forces and significantly reduce their operational capabilities.

Moreover, a hypothetical successful strike on such a base would have political significance. It would demonstrate that the attacking country has the necessary weapons for such an operation and is capable of using them. Furthermore, the penetration of even a single missile could damage the US's reputation as a significant power in the region.


Khyber missile launch

Long range


Iran has developed and fielded a large number of ground-based ballistic missile systems of various classes, including both tactical and medium-range missiles. All modern examples of such weapons have been and are being used in Operation True Promise, including the current one.

It's worth recalling that Iran previously committed to not developing, producing, or fielding missile systems with a range of 2 kilometers or more. At the time, it was believed that such a voluntary restriction would positively impact the situation in the region and prevent potential escalation.

As events in recent years have shown, such measures have not been justified. At the same time, Iran has gained the moral right to lift its missile range restrictions and begin developing a new one. weapons or modernization of existing models. The results of this work were first shown on the night of March 21.

The exact missile system that attacked the American base remains unknown. Various theories have been put forward, including the use of modified missiles from existing types or the first combat use of entirely new systems. Which of these assumptions is true remains unclear.


The simplest theory, however, involves a specially designed missile from one of the existing types. Thus, an IRBM with a rated range of no more than 2 km could be equipped with a non-standard, lighter warhead. The reduced weight would improve the missile's power-to-weight ratio and thereby increase its range.

This scenario doesn't contradict physics, but it does raise some questions. For example, it's unclear how much the payload had to be reduced to double the range. The most advanced Iranian missiles, such as the Khorramshahr series IRBM, have a throw-weight of 1500-1800 kg. A hypothetical extended-range modification would then be able to carry only hundreds of kilograms.

At the same time, the possibility of developing an entirely new, longer-range missile system cannot be ruled out. In particular, this new design could explain the malfunctions on one of the launched missiles. However, no information on this matter is currently available. Furthermore, it is unclear why Iran did not take advantage of the opportunity to showcase its new IRBM with improved characteristics and capabilities.

First try


Iran is once again demonstrating its advanced long-range weaponry. Using its ballistic missiles and UAVs, it is striking distant enemy targets, both in neighboring countries and in Israel. Furthermore, an attempt was made to attack the Diego Garcia air base, some 4 km away.

It's safe to assume that the Iranian armed forces won't limit themselves to two IRBMs and will attempt another attack on the American base in the near future. Whether they will succeed in hitting important targets and disabling them remains to be seen. However, Iran now has the necessary tools, capabilities, and, importantly, the will to do so.
34 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    24 March 2026 05: 18
    The result of Iran's actions is the Red Liar's announcement of negotiations. Mattresses never negotiate unless they're confident of victory.
    And imposing any restrictions on weapons types in the modern world is critically dangerous. Kim Won doesn't limit himself in any way, and everyone goes around him!
  2. +8
    24 March 2026 05: 21
    This launch also caused a stir in Europe, as they suddenly realized that almost all of their capitals were within the range of Iranian missiles, and they had very short-sightedly drained their stockpiles of anti-missiles and weakened their own air defenses by transferring them to Kuev.
    1. -1
      24 March 2026 05: 31
      They clearly hit the archipelago.
    2. -1
      24 March 2026 17: 29
      Quote: Nyrobsky
      and they very short-sightedly drained their stockpiles of anti-missiles and weakened their own air defense by transferring them to Kuev.

      You'd think the EU was being threatened. They wouldn't risk anything even if they handed over all their missiles.
      1. +1
        24 March 2026 18: 13
        Quote: Krasnoyarsk
        Quote: Nyrobsky
        and they very short-sightedly drained their stockpiles of anti-missiles and weakened their own air defense by transferring them to Kuev.

        You'd think the EU was being threatened. They wouldn't risk anything even if they handed over all their missiles.

        That's the whole point, they distributed their missiles and cut back on air defense, knowing with absolute certainty that there was no threat to them from Russia and all their talk about a Russian threat was nothing more than fiction.
        However, the situation has changed a little now, and they are no longer confident that if they join the US and Israel, Iranian missiles will not reach them.
        1. +1
          24 March 2026 19: 06
          Quote: Nyrobsky
          that if they join the United States and Israel, Iranian missiles will not reach them.

          Hypothetically, you're right. But Iran's main enemy is 1. Israel, 2. the United States.
          If you believe the media, the Persians almost They destroyed nearby US bases, so given that the Persians don't have a magic wand, they spend a lot of money on missile production, so they'll spend it on Jews and destroying US bases. And why would they attack the EU, thereby provoking a counterattack? Whatever one may say, the EU is a serious adversary for Iran. It's no wonder Donya is begging the EU to join the operation, realizing that it's very difficult to do so on his own. But "it's not over yet," we'll see what happens next. Will Donya risk a ground operation or declare himself "victorious"?
          1. +1
            24 March 2026 22: 01
            Quote: Krasnoyarsk
            Hypothetically, you're right. But Iran's main enemy is 1. Israel, 2. the United States.
            According to the media, the Persians have almost destroyed nearby US bases,
            That's right, Iran's main targets are Israel and the United States, which they are cultivating to the best of their ability. Admittedly, they're cultivating quite well. As for Europe, as well as other regional powers, Iran warned them that they would be subject to attacks on their territory if the United States used it to attack Iran. The regional powers are already being targeted, while Europe was hesitating whether to join this fight on the US side. After a strike on an island 4000 km from Iran, Europe will likely no longer be able to participate, as its own interests are closer to home.
            Quote: Krasnoyarsk
            Considering that the Persians don't have a magic wand, they spend a lot of money on producing missiles, so they will spend it on the Jews and finishing off US bases.
            Iran has enough missiles to last for months. They were well prepared for a protracted war and placed their bets on missile weapons.
            There's some interesting material on Iran's missile program here. Admittedly, the data is five years old, but it's enough to conclude that the Persians were preparing for this war for the next five years.
            https://patarames.blogspot.com/2020/11/irans-path-to-second-strike-capability.html
            Quote: Krasnoyarsk
            But "it's not over yet," we'll see what happens next. Will Donya risk a ground operation or declare he's already "won"?

            A land operation would be the redhead's biggest mistake. hi
  3. -2
    24 March 2026 05: 35
    It can be assumed that the Iranian armed forces will not limit themselves to two IRBMs, and will try to attack the American base again in the near future.

    Could you offer some documentation from Oreshnik to speed up development... feel
  4. +2
    24 March 2026 05: 38
    Now the Americans can be satisfied. They now have a physical justification for deploying their missile defense systems and dual-use missiles in Eastern Europe. They can now justifiably claim that their missiles in Europe are not intended to attack Russia, but to defend against Iran.
    1. +3
      24 March 2026 06: 06
      Now the Americans can be satisfied. They now have a physical justification for deploying their missile defense systems and dual-capable missiles in Eastern Europe.
      Well, Iran now has a 100% justified reason to strike these bases.
      1. +6
        24 March 2026 09: 03
        Whether they'll hit the bases at such a distance is a big question. But they could very well expand the number of those joining the American-Israeli coalition this way. :((
        1. +3
          24 March 2026 10: 02
          Quote from solar
          Whether they'll hit the bases at such a distance is a big question. But they could very well expand the number of those joining the American-Israeli coalition this way. :((

          So they've all already de facto joined in. No matter what everyone else is screaming about on the air, what's wrong with hitting back?
          1. +1
            24 March 2026 10: 09
            So they have all already de facto joined.

            They haven't really joined yet. But if they do join completely, does Iran need it?
            1. -3
              24 March 2026 19: 50
              The Iranian leadership continues to take a risky, "worse is better" approach. It's bound to end somewhere, no matter what...
    2. +2
      24 March 2026 11: 25
      Quote: Yuras_Belarus
      Now the Americans can be satisfied. They now have a physical justification for deploying their missile defense systems and dual-capable missiles in Eastern Europe.

      Has the US ever needed physical evidence? wink
      They have already started a war several times based on their own propaganda. And when it turned out that the political officer is lying © - they got away with everything. Saddam's weapons of mass destruction were never found.
      1. +1
        24 March 2026 21: 22
        They did find some things. But the war with Saddam began with his invasion of Kuwait, not with WMD.
        1. -1
          25 March 2026 10: 33
          Quote from solar
          They did find some things. But the war with Saddam began with his invasion of Kuwait, not with WMD.

          This first began with the invasion of Kuwait - Desert Storm in 1991.
          The pretext for the second war in the early 2000s was US statements about Saddam's development and mass production of WMD.
          You remember this frame and this frame:

          No WMD stockpiles were ever found in Iraq. And so the topic gradually shifted to "We came to bring freedom and democracy to the people of Iraq.".
          I've spoken about my desire to promote democracy in various countries around the world, as was the case in Iraq, where there is freedom of religion and freedom of speech. Many would like to see such democracy in Russia as well.
          - We would not like to have the same kind of democracy as in Iraq.
          © Bush and Putin press conference in St. Petersburg, July 15, 2006.
          1. +1
            25 March 2026 12: 37
            This first began with the invasion of Kuwait - Desert Storm in 1991.

            The first and only one, it took place in two stages. The first stage was the liberation of Kuwait. After that, Saddam was presented with a dozen demands, but he failed to comply, and the second stage began.
  5. 0
    24 March 2026 07: 37
    Eh...it would be better if they hit the BAE Systems factories as part of the demilitarization of Britain.
  6. +3
    24 March 2026 08: 18
    Are there really missiles? And if so, were they specifically Iranian? It's just that an attack with just two missiles doesn't make sense.
    1. +3
      24 March 2026 08: 47
      So that there would be something to write about on VO, and local fans of Islamic radicals would go into ecstasy over it. Yes laughing
      1. -2
        24 March 2026 19: 53
        Here it is sacred; many, apparently to the point of losing some sense of direction, sympathize (and dream) with export-import operations with the “products” of the so-called Islamic revolution. winked
    2. +2
      24 March 2026 09: 44
      The missile's body appears to be Iranian, but the internals are likely Chinese, from a CJ-100.
      In general, the ideal plan is to conduct thermonuclear tests on a remote atoll
    3. +3
      24 March 2026 12: 54
      The American military confirmed the attack. So, did they lie? Why? The point was to test the ballistic missile's functionality. If at least one of them reached the island, that means the ballistic missile is operational, and we can continue onward.
  7. +4
    24 March 2026 09: 00
    It turns out that the Iranian armed forces now have missile systems capable of attacking targets at such ranges.

    That's not working at all. Did the author even read his own article? It's clear from his own article that Iran couldn't confirm its ability to attack targets at such a distance (let alone hit anything significant—most of the atoll is a lagoon; it missed by a hundred or so meters—except maybe by stunning a fish).
    1. +1
      24 March 2026 15: 03
      I agree.
      And in general, nothing is clear about this attack.
      How many kilometers did these missiles fly in total?
      What makes you think they can travel more than 2000 km? Where were they shot down?
      Maybe they just fired a regular ballistic missile with a range of 2000 km at Diego Garcia without a payload and no chance of success.
      But they made a concrete noise.
  8. +1
    24 March 2026 09: 48
    A hypothetical modification with increased range in this case would only be able to carry hundreds of kilograms.

    At the same time, the possibility of developing a completely new, long-range missile system cannot be ruled out.
    1. +3
      24 March 2026 10: 03
      Quote: Nikolaevich I
      At the same time, the possibility of developing a completely new, long-range missile system cannot be ruled out.
      Or a trial batch of imported goods. Purely for testing purposes.
      1. -1
        24 March 2026 15: 19
        Quote: abrakadabre
        Or a trial batch of imported goods. Purely for testing purposes.

        By the way, yes Yes In case of a miss or a knockdown, the ends are in the water)
    2. +1
      24 March 2026 12: 56
      Hundreds of kilograms is enough for two or three tactical-grade special warheads, even at the level of North Korean technology. More than enough for a small island.
  9. -5
    24 March 2026 12: 50
    This is a Jewish canard. Iran didn't fire at Diego Garcia; it doesn't have such missiles. And Israel is using this to scare Europe, claiming Iran will soon strike you, and you should join the war against Iran.
  10. +3
    24 March 2026 13: 52
    For us (the Russian Federation) there are three thoughts:
    - It is necessary to place Oreshnik in different parts of the Russian Federation.
    - We need to follow China's example and make anti-ship warheads for IRBMs.
    - The Kinzhal system needs more carriers and locations for their deployment, as well as anti-ship missile variants.
  11. +1
    25 March 2026 11: 11
    This means that BR will reach London.
    There is panic in the EU.
  12. 0
    25 March 2026 21: 57
    Quote: Micha1981
    They clearly hit the archipelago

    Even if they missed. Although it's hard to believe even the missile broke in flight. They'll add to that, and the Americans won't be relaxing in such beautiful places and will be moving their missile defense systems to other areas.