We sing glory to the best of the best! 120 years of Russian submarine fleet

11 791 40
We sing glory to the best of the best! 120 years of Russian submarine fleet


Before launching into what's usually written in such cases, I'd like to make a brief digression. Over the past century and a half, humanity has come up with many interesting technical solutions that have allowed us, as they say, to go "higher, further, and faster."



Yes, we've mastered supersonic speeds and reached altitudes of 400 kilometers above the planet's surface—in short, progress is evident. Heck, even the most ordinary people can easily fly at 10 kilometers to warm their bellies.

But if you look down and peer into the black depths of the water... You immediately understand that higher and faster - yes, but deeper - somehow... not at all.

Let's consider how many people have overcome gravity and flown into Earth's orbit, those infamous 400,000 meters? 644 people to date.

What if we take just 10,000 meters, but down? Not 400 kilometers, but 10? Forty times less?

The answer is devastating: 27 people. One, the absolutely reckless American Victor Vescovo, did it 11 times, lowering people in his bathyscaphe to depths of more than 10 km.

Sadly, it's a fact: humanity has only been able to penetrate a mere 500 meters below sea level. Any lower/deeper reaches only specialized deep-sea vehicles. It's an interesting development, but humans have mastered space far better than the ocean.

And in this world, where light begins to fade below 100 meters, they meet—large, streamlined steel ships, calm and deadly as sperm whales. Sperm whales dive deeper; ships can effortlessly wipe a continent off the map. To each their own.


As experience has shown, cosmonauts can be retrieved from Earth. A military pilot has a catapult and a parachute, a sailor has a lifeboat or a life raft. A submariner has a slim chance of rescue, and nothing more.

There was so much of this: the red emergency light, the creaking of bulkheads, the roar of rushing water, the blaring of sirens, and the darkness ahead. And what those who entered their final battle with no chance of victory felt, from the Dolphin to the Kursk, is remembered in the cold waters of various seas.

Indeed, submariners are the elite of the elite, operating in the most hostile environment for humans (though, admittedly, without which this species cannot survive), on highly sophisticated ships, and not exposed to sunlight for months at a time… They are extremely strong and formidable. A true elite of the elite, and no matter how much we praise our military personnel from all branches of the armed forces, submariners are still something above all others.


And today we say: Glory to the Russian submarine fleet! Glory to the Russian submariners who have protected our safety for 120 years on all the seas washing our shores!

On March 9, 1906, by decree of Emperor Nicholas II, the Russian Imperial navy A new class of vessels appeared - submarines. In fact, submarines had existed before this moment (historical (excursion will follow) in the Imperial Navy, but they were part of the destroyer forces, and by decree of Emperor Nicholas II they were allocated to a separate class.


In fact, since 1892, the Russian Imperial Navy's mine-laying class was supplemented by submarines as a class of mine-laying ships. On March 19 (March 6, old style), 1906, submarines were designated a separate class of ship by imperial decree. This day became an unofficial holiday for submariners, and it became official exactly 90 years later, on July 15, 1996, by order of the Commander-in-Chief of the Russian Navy.

Let's talk a little about historical names. Boats are boats, but people are the force that creates them.

Schilder Karl Andreevich, engineer-general



The creator of a prototype submarine powered by muscle power and mechanical "flippers." The crew consisted of two commanders and 12 oarsmen. The submarine was armed with a gunpowder mine, which the submarine was supposed to attach to the ship's hull and activate with an electric fuse after withdrawing to a safe distance.

Stefan Karlovich Dzhevetsky


The designer of the first Russian production submarines. His de facto patron was Emperor Alexander III, who ordered a series of 50 submarines.


Drzewiecki's first boats were powered by human muscle power, although he later improved the design by using an electric motor and battery. The boats were armed with two mines each, and the craft themselves were intended for the defense of naval fortresses.

Ivan Fedorovich Alexandrovsky


In 1866 he built a 350-ton boat.


It could dive and move underwater for relatively long periods using piston-powered pneumatic machines powered by compressed air from 200 high-pressure cast-iron cylinders.

Ivan Grigorievich Bubnov


The creator of the first truly Russian combat submarine with a gasoline engine and an electric motor. It was on the "Dolphin" that Russian sailors practiced the rules and techniques of everyday submarine operation and combat use.


Thirty-two submarines were built using Bubnov's designs, including the incomparable Bars, as well as the Minoga and Akula, the first Russian diesel submarines.

Mikhail Petrovich Nalyotov


He created the world's first underwater minelayer, the "Crab".


It's impossible to imagine the history of Russian submarine warfare without these people. Bubnov's submarines played a particularly significant role.

The Dolphin marked the beginning of the first stage in the development of the Russian submarine force, which ended in 1917. It wasn't much, but within 16 years, submarines had not only become an independent class in the Russian fleet, but also a fully formed combat force.

In total, 73 submarines have joined the Russian submarine forces during this time:
- 34 submarines were built according to domestic designs (almost all of them according to Bubnov’s designs);
- 16 - Russian-built according to designs by American engineers;
- 23 foreign-built submarines purchased abroad.

After the October Revolution and the Civil War, the Russian submarine fleet was virtually depleted. Some of the boats were lost during the First World War, many were stolen from Russia by the invaders and the retreating White Army. And some were sunk by the comrades who replaced the "hated tsarist regime."

As a result, by 1924, the Soviet submarine fleet had nine submarines in the Baltic Fleet and two in the Black Sea Fleet. It was only in 1927 that the Soviet Navy began its own submarine construction program.

The first Soviet submarines were the Dekabrist-class boats designed by K. I. Ruberovsky and B. M. Malinin and the Leninets-class underwater minelayers designed by B. M. Malinin.


Xenophon Ivanovich Ruberovsky


Boris Ivanovich Malinin


"Decembrist"

A few years later, mass construction of submarines of the Shchuka type, designed by the same brilliant Boris Malinin, and the Malyutka type, designed by A. N. Asafov, began.


Alexey Nikolaevich Asafov


These submarines became the most numerous in the Red Army Navy during the pre-war period: 77 and 78 boats, respectively.

In general, increasing the fleet by 15 times in just ten years is worthy of respect, no matter what.

The hard work did its job, and by the start of World War II, the Soviet Navy had 161 submarines, and the fleet entered the Great Patriotic War with 212 submarines—more than any other fleet, both among the Axis powers and the anti-Hitler coalition.

Germany began the war with 57 submarines, but set a record by launching and arming an additional 1099 boats during the war. The Italian Navy had 115 submarines, making it the largest submarine fleet in Europe. The British had only 69 boats, adding another 165 during the war. France had 77 submarines before the war. The US submarine fleet numbered 112 submarines, adding another 203 by the end of the war. The Japanese Navy entered the war with only 64 submarines, but built an additional 129 within four years.

There are, of course, many nuances here, both in terms of submarine deployment and deployment. Soviet submariners contributed to the Victory, no matter what one says, and the names of Marinesko, Kolyshkin, and Matiyasevich (one of the most effective commanders of the Baltic Fleet: three ships were sunk by torpedoes from his Lembit, and four more were blown up by mines laid by the Lembit) have become symbols of the success of our submariners.


Alexey Mikhailovich Matiyasevich


Submarine "Lembit"

And, of course, Grigory Ivanovich Shchedrin, a legend, just like his S-56. This crew and its commander, along with the submarine, absolutely deserved all the awards their homeland bestowed upon them.


Firstly, the S-56 only began fighting in the spring of 1943, transferring under its own power from the Pacific Ocean to the Northern Fleet, which in itself was an epochal event.


Secondly, Shchedrin and his crew were not known for claiming credit for their victories. The S-56 had already achieved outstanding results compared to other submarines, sinking two enemy vessels and two enemy ships. There was also an instance where a torpedo that had already hit its target failed to detonate.

Thirdly, it is the only submarine to hit two targets with one salvo.

Fourthly, this is the only boat to survive among its titled Guards Red Banner “sisters”.

The most remarkable thing is that after the war, the S-56 returned to the Far East, this time via the Northern Sea Route, thus completing the route around the globe.

After the war, the growth rate of the Soviet submarine fleet skyrocketed. In 1950, the first submarine of Project 613, the most produced in Soviet history, was laid down at the Krasnoye Sormovo shipyard in Gorky (now Nizhny Novgorod). A total of 215 submarines of this project were built.


There were also other large series of diesel submarines; for example, 75 Project 641 submarines were built, while nuclear submarines were built in series of two to three dozen.


Let's give credit to Soviet shipbuilders: by the end of the 80s, the Soviet Navy had 450 submarines:

- 83 strategic nuclear-powered missile submarines;
- 113 multi-purpose nuclear submarines;
- 254 diesel-electric submarines.

Indeed, after the collapse of the USSR, it was the Russian Navy's submarine forces that became the shield that reliably protected a country that, frankly, was not in the best of shape. Our submarines, having changed their flag, continued to demonstrate their power and readiness to pulverize any enemy.

And yes, a very serious survey: what did our enemies fear more: land forces? missiles Or submarines. Generally speaking, of course, launching missiles from a submarine near US territorial waters is far more terrifying and dangerous than launching missiles from underground silos, simply because the locations of these silos have long been known, whereas predicting the point from which a Russian submarine will decide to deliver a bouquet is practically impossible. It will deliver from wherever it wants.

And here we can recall that three of our submarines were included in the Guinness Book of Records.

1. The world's largest nuclear submarine, the heavy nuclear-powered strategic submarine TK-208 Dmitry Donskoy of Project 941 (Akula) with a normal displacement of 23,200 tons.


2. The submarine with the greatest recorded diving depth is the K-278 Komsomolets, a Project 685 (Plavnik) submarine that dived to a depth of 1027 meters on August 4, 1985.


3. The submarine that managed to reach the highest underwater speed was the K-162 of Project 661 (Anchar), which accelerated underwater to 44,7 knots on December 18, 1970.


By the way, the records are not broken.

Then came the 90s, and all that remained of its former might was shreds. But even in those difficult and shameful times, Russian submarines continued to guard the country's borders and demonstrate their combat effectiveness.

It is encouraging that our shipbuilders have recovered from all the crises and have not lost the ability to modernize submarines and build new ones.

Today the number is not so great: in total, as of the end of 2015, there were 72 submarines:

- 48 nuclear (13 submarines with ballistic missiles and 9 with cruise missiles, as well as 18 multi-purpose and 8 special-purpose boats);
- 24 diesel (including one special purpose).


Some may find this frankly insufficient, especially compared to the US submarine fleet. But these forces are quite sufficient to maintain parity in the ocean. It would be wrong to say that our Borei-class and Yasen-class submarines are significantly inferior to the American Virginia-class and Ohio-class submarines. These are highly modern ships, capable of providing a worthy response to any aggressor.

They say that our submarine fleet is now only one step behind the most powerful and largest submarine forces and has every chance of regaining its primacy.

It's hard to say how necessary this is; what's more important is that powerful and deadly ships are only half the battle. They simply need top-class professionals, in whose hands these ships will truly become weapons, capable of cooling the ardor of even Donald Trump.

Congratulations to the submariners and everyone involved on the 120th anniversary of the Russian submarine forces!
40 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. + 13
    19 March 2026 04: 23
    ❝ 120 years of Russian submarine fleet ❞ —

    — Happy Holidays, submariners! ...

    - "We're going under water.
    In neutral water.
    We can by year
    "I don't care about the weather" © ...
    1. +8
      19 March 2026 05: 01
      Congratulations to the submariners and everyone involved on the 120th anniversary of the Russian submarine forces!
    2. +5
      19 March 2026 05: 03
      These are very strong and fortitude people.

      And we sing their glory!
      Happy holiday to you, fearless tribe of humanity!
  2. + 10
    19 March 2026 05: 20
    Happy holiday to everyone involved!
  3. +5
    19 March 2026 05: 23
    I'm glad this liberal nonsense didn't destroy the submarine fleet. My warmest congratulations to all the submariners!
    1. +2
      19 March 2026 13: 08
      Schneeberg (Oleg), sir, your first proposal is highly questionable. But I support the second!
  4. +5
    19 March 2026 06: 00
    Happy Sailors' Day, submariners! You are our best hope for containing the predator.
  5. +3
    19 March 2026 06: 36
    A beautiful article in every respect, without irony or sarcasm—well, at least until we reach the 90s. Happy holidays to everyone involved.
  6. +5
    19 March 2026 06: 39
    Happy holiday! Three cheers!!! drinks
  7. The comment was deleted.
  8. The comment was deleted.
  9. +4
    19 March 2026 06: 50
    Happy anniversary! The number of dives will necessarily equal the number of surfacings!
  10. +1
    19 March 2026 06: 52

    The crew of the Yuri Dolgoruky is lined up on the deck of TK-208, pictured here. August 2009.
  11. The comment was deleted.
  12. The comment was deleted.
  13. +6
    19 March 2026 07: 04
    Long ago, young and reckless, I served my country as a submariner. It was a crazy time, brutal to the point of hiccups. Pure antagonism.

    In general, the submariner is not a profession. And, contrary to popular belief, not even fate and religion. Submariner is a diagnosis. A healthy person will not, blazing eyes, study for five years, then to dive under water in a samovar pipe, annoying the enemy from there in sophisticated ways.

    A special mental warehouse is needed here. Well, or its complete absence.

    Submariners in abnormal conditions perform actions that an ordinary person can hardly imagine. They cleverly manage clever mechanisms and monstrously destructive weapons. With one button they tame the atom, with the other two - they rule the thousand-ton colossus at the heading and depth. And the third blow overboard the contents of the latrine overboard, giving this considerable pleasure to the inhabitants of the dark depths.

    All this is done routinely, as a matter of course. No sense of elite exclusivity: businesslike and with a fine cut, not yet touched by the mold of reasonable caution.

    When shy young ladies ask: “Isn't that scary?” - the underwater sailor shrugs in bewilderment. “No,” he says, “ordinary work.”

    And pensively spills.

    And then he jumps into his beloved hidden vessel, kicks off the pier, and dissolves in the gloomy wave, finally gurgling ballast tanks.

    Happy holiday to you, underwater brothers! Especially those on whose emblem bottlenose dolphin still flaunts - who to this day plow open spaces and break open ice with a ridge. Who goes to the MKUM, untwists gyroscopes, and shoots explosive objects over the horizon, causing longing for the antisubmarine forces of a potential enemy.

    All those who, mercilessly speaking foul language, are hoisted by the storms of St. Andrew’s flag on the wreckage of our dismal skepticism.

    Ergo bibamus! (c)

    Author - Sergey Kirillovich Guryanov
    1. +1
      19 March 2026 17: 10
      Long ago, young and reckless, I served my country as a submariner. Those were crazy times, harsh to the point of hiccups.
      My brother served on the Buka-69, a submarine widely known in certain circles. He declined leave because he was scheduled for an autonomous mission, after which he was awarded the "For Military Merit" medal. He was proud of his title as a submariner and slightly regretted not having served on a nuclear submarine.
  14. +2
    19 March 2026 07: 21
    Happy holiday, everyone! As a friend of mines used to say, "Back in oil, nose in grease, but at least we're in the submarine fleet!"
  15. The comment was deleted.
  16. +2
    19 March 2026 07: 38
    There is something to be proud of. The Russian submarine fleet has a glorious history!
    I would like to see such a future.
    1. -2
      19 March 2026 08: 25
      I have never shared the enthusiasm of our submariners regarding Project 941 (Akula). I have always believed and still believe that submarines were designed by people for the sake of stealth, secrecy and invisibility. The record size of a submarine cannot be an advantage. Its enormous size (underwater displacement of 48000 tons) did not contribute to stealth in any way and made navigation under the ice in the shallow seas of the Arctic difficult.
      1. +3
        19 March 2026 13: 29
        Agund, sir, how many years did you serve on diesel-electric and nuclear-powered submarines, as well as special-purpose submarines, before joining Project 941 (Akula)? How many autonomous units did you have on the Akula? Or is your "always counted and counting" purely theoretical?
        Now, if, sir, you had invented solid fuel for SLBMs in the USSR in the 1960s, launched it and the missiles carrying it, so that your missiles could fly further than the R-39 and carry 10 payloads, and mass-produced it, replacing the legendary Sergei Nikitich Kovalev, and, at the same time, streamlined the production of titanium hulls for missile submarines (like the Akulas), and, well, and the little things like the design of the KSP and the filling basin with the Sukhona floating dock at Sevmash, redesigned and built it, we would remember you in our prayers every night. Honestly, honestly!
      2. +5
        19 March 2026 14: 10
        Quote: agond
        I have never shared the enthusiasm of our submariners regarding Project 941 (Shark)
        Why did the Americans insist on destroying these submarines in the first place, as per the agreements with Gorbachev?... The Akula was as quiet as our other missile submarines. Moreover, submarines of this series were primarily designed for patrols under the Arctic ice cap, where the natural cracking of the ice made it difficult to detect underwater, and the ice provided protection from surface ships and aircraft. With its weight, the submarine could break through most of the Arctic ice when surfacing. Its extensive endurance and crew comfort allowed for extended periods of patrol; the submarine could even simply anchor underwater. Regarding "shallow seas"... The average depth of the Arctic Ocean is 1225 meters, with a maximum of 5527 meters. Folklore about the "uselessness" of aircraft carriers and submarines, that "the sea didn't fit," was composed for Russia in the United States and circulated in Russian media. There is no need to repeat harmful nonsense.
      3. +1
        19 March 2026 19: 35
        Quote: agond
        The enormous size (underwater displacement of 48000 tons) did not contribute to secrecy

        Nevertheless, the 941 was the quietest of our nuclear-powered submarines. And its size allowed it to break through the ice very effectively, meaning the ship could carry a submarine under the ice, nullifying the airborne component of NATO anti-submarine warfare, and then surface, breaking through the ice, and bam...
    2. -2
      19 March 2026 13: 07
      If it's not a secret... more details about the "glorious" history of the submarine fleet.. and not on the history from the USSR but after the 90s, when documents "from there" became available (no, of course, you CAN say they brazenly lie there, but... why do they need THIS today???) .. so the Great (aka the First World War).. the successes of the submarine fleet (well, of course, there are few goals, successes, accordingly, well, at the level of Austria-Hungary).. The Civil War, here the sinking of the British destroyer by the Panther... worthy (though the Panther commander ... then .. oh well) and here is the Second World War (aka the Second World War).. at first, the largest (in the world, Karl) submarine and ... and here everything is ambiguous ... if you believe the historians from the communists .. everything is worthy .. but if you believe the same A.E. Taras "Submarine in the Second World" from 2004 ... from 1941_1945 the title Nineteen submarine commanders received the Hero of the Soviet Union (HSS) title, but six of them didn't sink a single ship. Believe it or not, you can blame the Germans for regularly inflating their sunken tonnage, but THAT'S different.
      And so from 1945-1991 there was construction... a ton of projects for a fantastic price (and they kept buying wheat in the States until 1994...) well, we won't stop at the price... as long as there's no war... and there wasn't one until the 80s, but the submarine fleet has nothing to do with it...
      Summary...investments in the navy (including submarines) in Russia, then in the USSR, and again in Russia, are traditionally high, but the return...be the judge...I just made (tried to) some money...
      Well, and the submarine. HAPPY HOLIDAYS!!!
      1. 0
        20 March 2026 10: 28
        Lokki, enough about wheat!!! This perestroika cliche, utterly jaded by stinking liberals, is truly getting on my nerves. Feed grain was mainly purchased!!! For livestock and animal husbandry!! Because there was a huge livestock herd! I myself worked on river vessels in 1992, and we unloaded this grain at the St. Petersburg roadstead!!! Not everything was perfect in the USSR, but its defense capabilities were top-notch! Because no one wanted a repeat of 1941!! So building a submarine fleet was absolutely justified!!
  17. The comment was deleted.
  18. +3
    19 March 2026 08: 15
    Happy holiday to our dear anniversaries!!!
  19. +3
    19 March 2026 08: 21
    Good luck and always come back!
  20. +4
    19 March 2026 08: 34
    Happy 120th anniversary of the submarine fleet.
    Photo from the mid-1970s (second half of the middle).
    The heroes are still alive.
  21. +2
    19 March 2026 08: 36
    Rich history of the Russian/Soviet fleet.
    You can rewatch the films: Commander of the Lucky Pike, Secret Fairway, Listen in the Compartments...
    1. +3
      19 March 2026 10: 33
      Quote: dragon772
      Rich history of the Russian/Soviet fleet.
      You can rewatch the films: Commander of the Lucky Pike, Secret Fairway, Listen in the Compartments...

      How could it not be like the film "72 meters"...
      Happy holiday, submariners!
      1. +1
        22 March 2026 09: 27
        Quote: yuriy55
        Quote: dragon772
        Rich history of the Russian/Soviet fleet.
        You can rewatch the films: Commander of the Lucky Pike, Secret Fairway, Listen in the Compartments...

        How could it not be like the film "72 meters"...
        Happy holiday, submariners!

        Russian Vanya made a song! good
    2. +3
      19 March 2026 11: 48
      Das Boot (The Boat) is also about submariners, I recommend watching it.
      1. +5
        19 March 2026 16: 02
        Quote: panzerfaust
        Das Boot (The Boat) is also about submariners, I recommend watching it.

        This is the most honest film about a submarine (although not ours) that I have seen.
        Happy holiday to ours. Especially to those who've ever had to fight for their lives in an emergency compartment, knowing that bolts were stuck in the gears under the adjacent gears...
        For ours - to the fullest, silently and to the bottom...not diluted.
        Because strong-willed people drink strong drinks!
      2. +1
        23 March 2026 13: 14
        Of the German ones, this is the most plausible.
  22. +6
    19 March 2026 10: 27
    Happy holiday, dear submariners! You are the pride of the Russian fleet. May God grant you as many surfacings as you dive!
  23. +4
    19 March 2026 11: 04
    Happy holiday to everyone involved in the submarine fleet.
    And for active submariners, “the number of dives must be equal to the number of surfacings!”
  24. +3
    19 March 2026 14: 35
    Happy Holidays! drinks
  25. +2
    19 March 2026 15: 00
    Congratulations to the submariners and everyone involved on the 120th anniversary of the Russian submarine forces!
  26. +1
    19 March 2026 20: 29
    Quote: Tests
    We would remember you in our prayers every evening. Truly, truly, honestly!

    I didn't want to get into an argument with you (since we held different ranks). It seems you were a manager, and I'm a simple engineer. However, the concept of technical perfection is close to my heart. Regarding Project 941, with a displacement of 48000 tons, it had 20 missiles, meaning one missile accounted for 2400 tons of displacement. Why so much? To reliably float on ice, the buoyancy reserve was increased to 52%. As a result, three factors combined: large, oversized missiles, the missiles themselves being installed vertically in silos, and increased buoyancy reserve. As a result, the submarine ended up in the Guinness Book of Records. A legitimate question is whether other solutions are possible. As an engineer, I believe, for example, a missile could be placed in a container, placed 50-100 meters down on the seabed, and connected by cable to a small house on the shore. For launch, the container would shed ballast and float vertically, breaking through any ice. A container with a displacement of about 10 times smaller would be needed; 2400 tons were used in previous projects, and the missile could be heavier because there are no restrictions like on submarines. The container could easily be lifted and moved periodically; it's not a stationary object with known coordinates, so detecting and hitting it would be incredibly difficult, especially when there's ice on the surface.
    In terms of depths in the Arctic, hundreds of kilometers from the coastline there are shallow depths of 35-75 m, this is visible on any map.
    1. 0
      20 March 2026 15: 22
      Agund, sir, regarding the work on the Skif seabed-launched ballistic missile—that's not for me. That's for the fine specialists at the V.P. Makeyev State Rocket Center and the Rubin Central Design Bureau for Marine Engineering. They do, however, launch the missile without a cable connection to the beach house.
  27. +2
    19 March 2026 22: 14
    The submarine is compressed by wild pressure, the order is given: trim by the stern. This means that soon the guys will see a wave through the periscopes... Happy holiday, submariners!!!
  28. ada
    +1
    19 March 2026 23: 05
    Happy holiday, comrade submariners!
  29. 0
    19 March 2026 23: 06
    Happy submarine holiday! As for the number of submarines, it's depressing. We don't even have a hundred ships, while under the Soviet Union, two hundred sailed the seas and oceans, plus they were undergoing repairs, on vacation, and so on. But thank God, at least we have this.