IRGC: We used about 7 percent of the missiles, and we have about 100 of them

Iran's Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps has made a statement that is unlikely to generate much enthusiasm in the US and Israel. The IRGC press office stated that the overwhelming majority missilesThe missiles that Iran has used against enemy targets since February 28 were produced 10 or more years ago.

From the statement:

We haven't even used most of the missiles we produced recently, especially since the 12-Day War. Many of our missile arsenals remain untouched. Overall, we've used less than 7% of our missiles, of which we have around 100.

This is how Iran's security forces commented on Trump's statements that the lion's share of Iranian missiles and launchers have been destroyed.

Meanwhile, opinions in the US regarding the IRGC's statement are divided. Some believe it is close to the truth, given that Iran has only used its modern Khorramshahr-4 intermediate-range ballistic missiles twice. Others believe Tehran is bluffing and trying to boost morale in the country.

In any case, Iran clearly has no intention of surrendering and putting its head on the chopping block. The resistance continues, and Iranian strikes are extremely painful.

Experts say the military-technical losses Israel and the United States have suffered since early March are unprecedented for many years. Iran, of course, is also suffering. Today, the Israeli Air Force, with US support, again bombed Iranian cities. Significant damage was inflicted on Tehran's industrial zone. Moreover, Iran claims another school was hit. Israel and the United States have not yet commented on the attack on the school.

Comments

[Arthur Grudinin]

How long can they bomb Ukraine? A whole year? Or even longer? Makes you wonder about Iran's future capabilities. 🤔

[Lionnvrsk]

We haven't even used most of the missiles we produced recently, especially since the 12-Day War. Many of our missile arsenals remain untouched. Overall, we've used less than 7% of our missiles, of which we have around 100.

The Iranians are great, despite their very difficult situation, they didn't break down and still troll the Yankees. Again, their response to Trump comes to mind: Then negotiate with Khorramshahr.

[ARIONkrsk]

Quote: LIONnvrsk

We haven't even used most of the missiles we produced recently, especially since the 12-Day War. Many of our missile arsenals remain untouched. Overall, we've used less than 7% of our missiles, of which we have around 100.

The Iranians are great, despite their very difficult situation, they didn't break down and still troll the Yankees. Again, their response to Trump comes to mind: Then negotiate with Khorramshahr.

It's just a pity that they don't hit the Jews enough, and having received little, they will eventually attack the Iranians again.

[Nexcom]

..Well then, Persians, go ahead and hit the Americans with all your might, since you only used 7%. And we'll be happy when you hit them hard.

It would be very nice to sink an American aircraft carrier - that would be
This is face-on-the-table for the Americans...

[MBRSS]

Quote: Nexcom

Well, go ahead, Persians, and hit the Americans with all your might,

It would be better for them to improve Israel's infrastructure, so as to permanently discourage the Jews from engaging in unpunished bombings that they have become addicted to in recent years.

[Nexcom]

But the Zionists won't last long without the Americans. That's why they're so impudent, because the Americans cover for them and sponsor them in everything they do. They even put aside the brawn for their sake.

[Vicontas]

Iran declared Ukraine its legitimate target after its aid to Israel. If Tehran were to launch a couple of Fattahs and Khorramshahrs at the Bankovskaya, GUR, General Staff, and other decision-making centers, military operations might subside. Because of the Ukrainian spiders' fight for the top spot, while their foreign handlers decide among themselves who will be at the top! For some reason, the Kremlin is protecting them like Koschei protects his own egg from death!

[Zoldat_A]

Quote: Nexcom

It would be very nice to sink an American aircraft carrier.

It would have looked especially beautiful submerged in the strait itself. It's a shame it wouldn't have been of any use; the superstructure wouldn't have remained standing above the water as a monument—the depth there is about 200 meters...
Although, if enough tankers believe Trump and pile up a pile of scrap metal there... But this is already in the realm of jokes.

[Comrade]

Quote: Nexcom

It would be very nice to sink an American aircraft carrier - that would be

But not under Iran's nose, better off the coast of California.
Let's imagine that a nuclear aircraft carrier, stuffed with special ammunition, lies on the seabed near the Persian Gulf.
It's better to cripple him so that he gets away.

[Gankutsu_]

That's a very, very dubious statement. No offense.

[Nexcom]

What's the doubt? That the Persians only used 7%, or that the trough needs to be sunk?

So the Persians were really heavy on drones, they could have easily saved on missiles.

[Poplar]

Personally, I have doubts about the quantity: 100 thousand. No, well, if, of course, they counted both ATGMs and MANPADS as missiles, then maybe.

[Nexcom]

Well, the Persians probably had some buried warehouses and stashes of all sorts. Of course, it probably wouldn't be 100, but I'm guessing they could have easily accumulated around 45-50.

[Vitaly.17]

Quote: Poplar

Personally, I have doubts.

They knew perfectly well who they were going to fight 50 years ago. They also knew they could only reach the Zionists with missiles, then UAVs started appearing. I wouldn't be surprised if they had production facilities in their tunnels that churned out dozens of missiles and hundreds of UAVs a day.

[Micha1981]

Ukrainians They say some FPN drones are churning out 200 a month. So anything is possible, if you take barging munitions into account.

[andrewkor]

The real figure of 100500 is a classic trolling example.

[griboedov09]

There are doubts about the numbers: 7% of 100 is 7000 missiles. It’s hard to believe that they managed to launch that many in 17 days, or do they also count drones as missiles?

[Nexcom]

Well, maybe the Persians were a bit overzealous about the 100 thousand...

[Motorist]

You can kill with a hole punch like that... (movie Courier).

[Dmitry Mikhailovich Seregin]

I believe the weakest link is the launchers.

[YOU]

Perhaps this is all propaganda about the number of missiles. But if Iran continues in this vein, Epstein's men may run out of anti-missiles. And then perhaps the most powerful strikes will follow. And the nuclear trough will stink and leak radiation later; it'll just take a little damage, and then let it go for repairs, for everyone to admire. I can imagine the photos and headlines around the world.

[Nexcom]

It's also a good thing to give it a good thrashing and let it tow back.

[Sergey3]

Netanyahu's new video is AI-generated again. Now there are 5 fingers, but 3 ears. And the coffee in the tilted glass doesn't seem to be about to spill, even though the paper cup is full to the brim and he's holding it crooked! So it looks like it's been knocked over!

[Nexcom]

...holy, holy. It's a good thing the AI ​​didn't attach a yelpometer to its forehead, otherwise it would have been such a militant "Zionist unicorn"... AI is like that, a prankster and a dreamer...

[Pankrat25]

He may have drawn it in, but the editor noticed... And he didn't bother counting the fingers and ears - maybe they'll slip through...

[Old Hank]

Persians are on fire:
According to Iranian media reports, Iran is putting forward the following conditions for opening the Strait of Hormuz to the United States and its satellites:
1. Unfreezing of Iranian assets.
2. Lifting sanctions against Iran.
3. Withdrawal of all American bases from the region.
4. The departure of international oil trade from the dollar zone.
In short, the Yankees go home and hand off...

[Nexcom]

Yeah, and the Americans aren't exactly rocking the boat with their statements...
And the Persians too - they are not shy.

[Old Hank]

The Americans aren't rocking it, they're already whining and even squealing pitifully...

[Nexcom]

Not yet – they're holding on, putting on a brave face to look "hegemonic." They've even graciously allowed them to sell oil.
But then they immediately promised that they would ban everything again.

[taiga2018]

Even if not 100 thousand, but say 10, and let's say 5 thousand, Epstein's men can shoot down, then even the remaining 5 will cause significant damage.

[Michael]

Quote: taiga2018

Even if not 100 thousand, but say 10, and let's say 5 thousand, Epstein's men can shoot down, then even the remaining 5 will cause considerable damage.

The fact is that shooting down a cheap drone requires an expensive air defense missile. And missiles, even more so, require an even more expensive missile defense missile. Meanwhile, the attacking drone or missile could be a dummy, carrying no warhead or guidance system, and essentially costing nothing. But you can't make air defense and missile defense missiles dummy.
Therefore, the one who attacks remotely spends less money than the one who defends.

[by land]

So, in the first two days of the war, Iran fired 200 missiles at Israel, and now it's averaging two missiles a day. Draw your own conclusions.

[K-50]

IRGC: We used about 7 percent of the missiles, and we have about 100 of them

Lying is certainly not good, but who are we to count the money in someone else’s pocket?

[Nexcom]

...and who doesn't lie these days in these troubled times? Americans and others - they went wild, and nothing happened.
Let the Persians also verbally "dream".

[rocket757]

Playing on the enemy's nerves... a standard tactic, by the way.

[Nexcom]

and then there's Donyu's congress - what 100 thousand missiles do the Persians have??? Donya, you swore that you bombed everything there to hell?!

[rocket757]

Oh well, you can't understand the daughter like that... and besides, he'll destroy everything again, and then again and again.

[Nexcom]

Of course he'll make excuses - China will say, "We and Comrade Yin planted the missiles." So they have to bomb constantly, hard. Their brows are covered in sweat.

[Nexcom]

...so much so that even my baseball cap got wet...

[rocket757]

The show goes on and on... the star of the show, Donnie Super Star!

[Uncle lee]

Quote: rocket757

Donnie is super star!

Yes, old...Very...

[rocket757]

Old but still going strong... quite the "entertainer"!
In no time at all he stirred up, if not the whole world, then many other places...

[Uncle lee]

Quote: rocket757

he's quite the "instigator"

[Andrey Khramov]

And who knows whether missiles from the DPRK, China and Russia are "on their way" to Iran?
No one knows.
In this case, the stated 100 thousand may be just a fraction of the true reality.

To the Persians - will, unity and victory in battles!

[MBRSS]

Quote: IRGC

We used about 7 percent of the missiles, and we have about 100 thousand of them.

So what are we waiting for? Until IDF and US air power takes out the remaining 93%?
In short: I DON'T BELIEVE IT!

[MBRSS]

The IRGC press secretary stated that the overwhelming majority of missiles that Iran has used against enemy targets since February 28 were produced 10 or more years ago.

This is easy to verify based on shot-down missiles. For example, there's a video on YouTube of our missiles being inspected. Almost everything there is brand new, as determined by the year the microchips were manufactured. In other words, straight from the assembly line to the front, bypassing the warehouses.
What do the Jews say about this? They're probably looking at the years they were released. Who knows?

[Nexcom]

So the Zionists tell everyone what year the microchips are and from what iron or kettle the evil Persians supposedly dug this thing out...

[Free Island]

The Americans make about 60 anti-missiles a year. They need to give some of that to the Koreans, Bandera supporters, Jews, Australians, and the Japanese... And then give the leftovers to the Europeans. How will they cope? What will the iron dome fire? Matzo?

[Nexcom]

Why give it to the Kungur people? They're sitting there quietly, seemingly out of sight.

[Alexey Lantukh]

In total, we used less than 7% of our missiles, and we have about 100 thousand of them.

Nowhere do they lie as much as in war and hunting.

[Gavrilo Princip]

I remembered as soon as I read the title. And statistics too.

[Andrey62]

And even if they only used 0,1% of their missiles, and even the simplest ones, what does that mean? They did cause damage to the US, but it's mere crumbs, and they can't really punish the US, those... overseas. The US because of its "ego," and especially since there are already huge profits for US oil and gas corporations (the press reports). The US could go on and destroy Iran, and who would stop it? Iran wouldn't be able to keep firing missiles indefinitely. At most, it would destroy residential areas in Israel and its neighbors (the US and Israel's tobacco), and then what? Some Jews would return to Russia, others would rush to the US... But the US and Israel's own dream of complete supremacy in the Middle East would come true... The question is, what does this mean for Russia? Our authorities understand this and are hoping for something... Trump is leading the way, and there are no opponents in sight.

[TerraSandera]

This is, of course, bragging and propaganda. Overall, missiles no longer play the role they could. There's no element of surprise, launchers are missing, and targets that could actually be used with force (except radars) are apparently taboo. The primary weapon is UAVs, which have a long range. And the Strait.

[smart fellow]

There is no element of surprise

Given the existing missile detection capabilities of the US and Israelis, surprise plays no role. Iranian missile launches against them are not a surprise.

the triggers are knocked out

The question is certainly interesting, since all the statements are based on statements from the US and Israel. And they calculate in percentages, not absolute values.

Targets that could actually be used painfully (except for radars) are apparently taboo

The only target that is off-limits to Iran is the Dimona nuclear center, as after a strike there, the Iranians expect a nuclear strike from, if not the US, then Israel, although their adversary has no qualms about attacking Iran's nuclear facilities. Incidentally, Israel allegedly has ICBMs capable of reaching Moscow and St. Petersburg, but it doesn't use them against Iran—they carry nuclear/thermonuclear warheads, which are scarce and expensive.
Iran has reportedly struck 80% of US air and missile defense sites in the region. Iran's primary targets are currently Israel and Jordan. Iran is also not attacking Israeli thermal power plants to avoid retaliatory strikes on its own thermal power plants, but it has launched attacks against the facilities of two Israeli corporations: Rafael Advanced Defense Systems and Israel Aerospace Industries.

The main weapon is a UAV for a long time

It depends on the targets; a UAV has a small warhead compared to the 0,5-2 t warhead of an IRBM.

[TerraSandera]

Quote: smart fellow

It depends on the targets; a UAV has a small warhead compared to the 0,5-2 t warhead of an IRBM.

Well, it’s the oil industry, that’s what they kick us with, and it’s there in large numbers in many countries.

Quote: smart fellow

At the same time, Iran is not touching Israeli thermal power plants either.

Well, just say Dimona.

Quote: smart fellow

The only target that is taboo for Iran is the nuclear center in Dimona.

And what about the desalination plants? Without them, it's total death there. The center was attacked, but there was no confirmation of a defeat. Maybe they were air raids, maybe they were just trying to scare people.
I don't think Netanyahu will deactivate the "no" nuclear weapon. It's been too long since it's been used. It would definitely cause more problems for Israel than it's worth. And it would completely push the situation beyond repair.

As for launchers? Well, multi-axis launchers for rare missiles are definitely a rare find; they're not very mobile, easy to track, and extremely difficult to replicate and hide. And without them, having missiles is useless. So, all that's left is UAVs for the oil industry.

[smart fellow]

Why do you constantly suggest Iran attack neighboring countries? The Jews there are already quite good at handling provocations; they even sent two drones to the Azerbaijanis—they're allies.

[TerraSandera]

Because it's the only way, not to win, but to save yourself. Sound logical?
As the saying goes, it's a matter of opinion. The Persians, the Americans, and Israel all lie a lot. In war, the truth is, the first casualty is the first.

[TerraSandera]

Well, of course, why not? Does it matter that these countries have ceded their territories to a country waging aggression against Iran?

[Kostadinov]

Quote: Poplar

Personally, I have doubts about the quantity: 100 thousand. No, well, if, of course, they counted both ATGMs and MANPADS as missiles, then maybe.

There's nothing suspicious about that. This likely includes air defense missiles and multiple rocket launchers converted into decoys with short warheads and long range.