The Strela-10 air defense missile systems remain in service and carry out combat missions.

12 041 53
The Strela-10 air defense missile systems remain in service and carry out combat missions.
Strela-10M air defense missile system during exercises


In March 1976, the Soviet army adopted the newest self-propelled anti-aircraft gun missile The 9K35 Strela-10 system. Serial production of this system began at that time, and it was widely deployed in the armed forces. Subsequently, the air defense system underwent several modernizations of varying scale, which improved various characteristics. As a result of these upgrades, modern versions of the Strela-10 still retain their high potential and demonstrate it in practice.



Consistent development


The development of the future 9K35 air defense missile system began in 1969 in accordance with a Council of Ministers resolution. The new system for the military Defense It was developed by the Precision Engineering Design Bureau under the leadership of A.E. Nudelman. A number of other companies were also involved in the project, responsible for the development and supply of various components.

The 9K35 Strela-10SV prototype system was manufactured in late 1972. Early the following year, it began field testing, which continued until May 1974. Overall, the air defense system met its design specifications, but some deficiencies needed to be addressed. This work took about a year, after which a new round of testing took place. This time, no objections were raised.

Following testing, in March 1976, the new 9K35 air defense system with the 9M37 guided missile was accepted into service and recommended for serial production. Soon, the industry manufactured the first production batches and delivered them to the troops. The new technology replaced the older Strela-1 systems.


Complex at a firing position

By this time, the Tochmash Design Bureau was working on the first modernization of the new system. The 9K35M Strela-10M project included replacing some of the onboard equipment. An improved missile, the 9M37M, was also developed. It received an upgraded homing head, significantly improving the acquisition and tracking capabilities of typical targets.

In 1978-79, the 9K35M with the 9M37M ammunition passed all tests and confirmed its stated performance. It was accepted into service in 1979. The modernized system replaced the basic modification in production, and the re-equipment of troops continued without delay.

As early as 1981, the next version of the system, the 3K35M2 Strela-M2, was accepted into service. While retaining the basic components, it was equipped with equipment for receiving target designation from higher command posts. This significantly improved the SAM's capabilities in challenging environments. Furthermore, the tracked chassis was equipped with additional floats for crossing water obstacles without any restrictions.

The Strela-10M3 modification was under development since 1983. The goal of this project was to improve the primary interception characteristics, for which purpose a new guided missile, the 9M333, was developed. Due to the overall complexity of the project, the 9K35M3 system was only accepted into service in 1989. However, serial production encountered well-known difficulties.


Despite all the limitations, KB Tochmash continued to improve the Strela-10. In 2005, it unveiled the next version of this air defense system, the Strela-10M4. This time, the main changes affected the combat vehicle. It received new optical target acquisition systems and modern communications and control equipment.

The latest in this series is the Strela-10MN modification, accepted into service in 2015. This design took into account the experience of previous upgrades and the general needs of military air defense. The air defense system retained the existing 9M333 missile with minor modifications and also received various modern electronics.

Technical capabilities


The overall architecture of the Strela-10 air defense system has remained unchanged throughout its development and modernization. In all cases, it remains a self-propelled vehicle on a tracked chassis with a fighting compartment equipped with the necessary instruments. The 9A35 vehicle carries a retractable launcher with guided missiles of one type or another.

All 9K35 modifications were built on the MT-LB tracked chassis. This vehicle boasts excellent maneuverability, cross-country ability, and load-carrying capacity. The weapon station and operator station were located in the rear of the hull, with components located above and below the turret ring.


Launch 9М333

Initially, the system's operator could only observe visually, through the inclined windshield at his workstation. Subsequently, various optoelectronic and television systems were offered. The latest modifications of the Strela-10 include a video camera and a thermal imager. These devices enable the detection of aerial targets over a wider radius and allow day/night operation. Automation of key processes has also been implemented.

In addition, the combat vehicle is equipped with communications equipment and devices for retrieving data from third-party sources. Starting with early modifications, the Strela-10 can operate using third-party target designation. This allows the operator to detect an approaching target before it enters the vehicle's line of sight.

The launcher has mounts for four transport and launch containers with missiles. Before launch, the launcher aims at the target by rotating in two planes. The 9M37 missile and its modifications, as well as the newer 9M333, have similar design, dimensions, and launch weight. They are built in elongated cylindrical bodies and equipped with several sets of planes. The length of the missile is approximately 2,2 meters, and its diameter is 120 mm. The weight of the missile without the container reaches 41-42 kg.

Early Strela-10 missiles were equipped with a dual-band seeker. The primary mode was photocontrast, with an additional infrared mode. The modern 9M333 missile has a three-band seeker, with infrared now the primary mode. It is claimed to be capable of confidently tracking a target regardless of interference.


The missiles are equipped with solid-fuel motors and have an average flight speed of 550 m/s. Regardless of the modification, the slant range reaches 5 km. The modern 9M333 delivers a 5 kg high-explosive fragmentation warhead with contact and proximity fuses.

Practical possibilities


Strela-10 air defense missile systems of all modifications have repeatedly demonstrated their potential during various tests and exercises. Furthermore, over the past decades, these systems have regularly participated in armed conflicts and fired at real aerial targets. Soviet- and Russian-made systems have successfully engaged a large number of targets of various classes and types.

Right now, combat crews are demonstrating and using the capabilities of the latest Strela modifications during the ongoing Special Operation. According to available data, during the combat operations, the latest modifications of the SAM systems were able to shoot down a number of enemy aircraft and helicopters. Furthermore, the Strela-10MN and other SAM systems with similar characteristics prevent enemy aircraft from aviation Operate at low altitudes and enter the close defense zone. This puts the aircraft at risk of entering the area of ​​responsibility of other air defense missile systems and air defense systems.

A variety of unmanned aerial vehicles have now become a typical target for Strel-10 missiles. Russian air defense systems regularly engage fixed-wing and rotary-wing UAVs. They disrupt reconnaissance missions or attempted aerial attacks. This clearly demonstrates all the advantages introduced by the latest upgrades.


A Ukrainian UAV was hit by a Strela missile.

Thus, the Strela-10MN air defense system, thanks to its modern optics, boasts an increased target detection and recognition range, including small ones. Moreover, the system remains operational at any time of day. The 9M333 missile's three-channel seeker reliably locks on even small targets with little contrast to the background.

At the same time, the system's technical limitations are being mitigated. For example, a launch range of 5 km is quite sufficient to counter UAVs, given the detection characteristics of such targets. A warhead of limited mass easily destroys them. Drones or deals fatal damage to them.

Updates and tasks


Thus, the first version of the Strela-10 proved to be a very successful base for modernization. It was repeatedly updated by replacing components and introducing new devices. This gave the system new combat and operational capabilities, as well as improved some of its characteristics.

Despite the age of the base, the latest modifications of the Strela-10 series air defense systems remain in service and perform combat missions. Moreover, they have proven themselves to be a successful means of combating one of the most common threats of our time. This indicates their continued high potential and the possibility of their future use.
53 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +4
    19 March 2026 04: 33
    Why wasn't this device available in Bryansk?
    There, an enemy reconnaissance UAV filmed the British missile strike on the enterprise with impunity.
    1. +9
      19 March 2026 05: 24
      Because without external targeting, this MTLB with its canisters is a blind mole, and with timely detection of the reconnaissance UAV, it would be much faster and more reliable to wipe it out with the air defense aircraft on alert, and they would also have seen the missiles in advance. But since there were no Su-35Xs patrolling the area at the time, everything remained as it was.
      1. 0
        19 March 2026 14: 26
        But since there were no SU-35x patrolling the area at that time, everything remained as it was.
        fighter jets have not been seen in combating drones and missiles
        1. 0
          22 March 2026 15: 02
          Quote from alexoff
          But since there were no SU-35x patrolling the area at that time, everything remained as it was.
          fighter jets have not been seen in combating drones and missiles

          The Sukhoi are heavily involved in drone operations. For example, my firstborn worked on drones in the Kostroma and Moscow regions last spring in the lead-up to and during Victory Day, and so we constantly alternate between drone missions and providing cover for army aviation. The guardsman already has nearly a hundred drones under his belt.
          1. +1
            22 March 2026 16: 25
            For some reason, they don't talk about this at all, they don't show it, they always only talk about air defense request
      2. 0
        19 March 2026 15: 36
        Quote: Shiry Prapor
        But since there were no SU-35x patrolling the area at that time

        The SU-35 appeared a few minutes after the attack. I saw it myself. Maybe that's why the drone footage is so short...
      3. 0
        20 March 2026 11: 54
        This requires not only weapons but also personnel (operators), and we are short of that... soldier
      4. +1
        April 13 2026 12: 16
        Adequate means must be used. For a heavy fighter, a drone is a target beyond its rank.
        A small air defense system with a variety of missiles—both the latest versions of the Arrow and Tor missiles—would be deployed in the area requiring protection, along with a guidance and control system for the entire complex. This would provide more or less cover, although the issues of detecting UAVs at significant range and the cost of anti-drone missiles remain.
        The arrow has an extremely limited range, the torus is more or less sufficient, and they complement each other well, but the arrow chassis is completely unsuitable for forming a continuous defense system—it's too expensive. Based on the experience of the armored carapace, something simpler should be developed.
        And rely more actively on developments like the TKB-1055 missile. However, this missile is still a bit pricey, costing 20 rubles. The Geranium costs the same. I don't understand why the Ministry of Defense looked on indifferently while Israel developed its dome, while we somehow didn't even bother developing high-performance air defense systems, limiting ourselves to mobile air defense systems like the Pantsir or Strela.
    2. +7
      19 March 2026 05: 30
      Why wasn't there one? Maybe there was, but a 5km firing range can't cover everything. Moreover, Russia has tens of thousands of factories, and to cover them all, hundreds of thousands of air defense systems would be needed.
      1. 0
        19 March 2026 10: 18
        That's understandable. Why can't we surround the 404th itself with three rings of air defense? Then the rest of Russia will breathe a sigh of relief.
        1. -2
          19 March 2026 11: 39
          Are you sure that all their long-range UAVs take off from territory 404? what
          1. +2
            19 March 2026 12: 55
            Well then we will have cast-iron facts about the participation of other border countries.
    3. +2
      19 March 2026 16: 42
      Why wasn't this device available in Bryansk?

      Probably because the drones themselves weren't there. Everyone went to defend Moscow. That's more important than microelectronics production. What if the Moscow residents get angry if the drones break something or, God forbid, kill someone? And here in the Belgorod region, the death toll is already approaching two hundred.
      I envy Moscow.
      1. 0
        21 March 2026 08: 21
        Let's put it this way... Moscow also has defense enterprises...
        1. +1
          21 March 2026 10: 46
          Yes, there is. Not everything has been plundered yet. But the main focus is defense science, as well as the management of the country and the troops, in Moscow. However, other strategic assets in various areas also need to be protected.
  2. P
    -7
    19 March 2026 05: 28
    The Strela 10 is a staple for medium-altitude reconnaissance and strike UAVs like the Bayraktar and other drones within its range. It's expensive, can't reach the Bayraktar, and instantly reveals itself to the AWACS constantly hovering over the Black Sea. Once the radar is activated, its lifespan can be tracked with the small hand of a clock. And it can't defend itself.
    1. + 14
      19 March 2026 06: 22
      The Strela 10 has a short lifespan after its radar is activated... I read your phrase and thought about it a lot. Are you sure you're talking about the Strela?
      1. +4
        19 March 2026 11: 50
        The Strela doesn't have an active radar. It has radiation sensors around the hull's perimeter. The Osa's radars are the same generation.
        1. +1
          19 March 2026 12: 00
          The article itself actually mentions the guidance system. Even if you don't know what a Strela is. That's why I was surprised by the comment I responded to.
    2. +8
      19 March 2026 08: 44
      Quote: Pandemic
      reveals itself instantly to AWACS

      Just between you and me, there's no radar there. It's a completely passive system; the radio station only receives data.
    3. 0
      April 13 2026 12: 19
      The upgraded arrow can shoot down bayraktars quite effectively.
      The problem is that it hits very close, and you can’t place it everywhere.
      We need something like the Thor M2 - it works very well against these types of UAVs.
  3. The comment was deleted.
    1. +8
      19 March 2026 05: 59
      Quote: air wolf
      If the Strela 10 rocket didn't cost 10 million rubles apiece

      The seeker is expensive. It's overkill for intercepting UAVs.
      1. 0
        20 March 2026 18: 01
        If only the Strela 10 rocket didn't cost 10 million rubles apiece... ... ...
        ... . . The seeker is expensive. It's overkill for intercepting UAVs.

        Where did the firewood come from? Where did the price tag come from?
    2. + 10
      19 March 2026 06: 58
      The economics of whether to shoot down or not has been discussed here more than once. It might seem foolish to fire a 10 million ruble missile at a 500 ruble drone, but firing that missile at a 500 ruble drone that could set fire to a nearby oil depot and cause 100 million ruble worth of damage doesn't seem so foolish. I'm not even considering the possibility of people dying, our people. hi
    3. +4
      19 March 2026 08: 43
      Quote: air wolf
      If the Strela 10 rocket didn't cost 10 million rubles apiece

      I don't know how much a Strela-10 missile costs, but it can't cost more than the much more advanced Pantsir missile (~1,5 million rubles). That's what I think.
      1. +4
        19 March 2026 10: 54
        The Pantsir missile has no seeker; it relies on radio commands from the launcher to guide it. The 9M333 missile of the Strela-10 air defense system, however, has a three-band optical seeker for homing. Therefore, the Pantsir missile is significantly cheaper.
        1. 0
          29 March 2026 10: 46
          I don't even understand the system's intended use. It's a self-contained missile with a seeker, capable of operating in jammed environments, at an altitude of 3,5 km, with a range of 5 km. You can't use it at the front—they'll burn out the Mavics, or the range would have to be increased to 20 kilometers. It's useless in the rear because the missile is expensive, and there's no radio jamming in the fields there.
          The very existence of the complex - wasn't it a waste of time?
          1. 0
            31 March 2026 01: 09
            Quote: tehnix
            You won't let her go to the front.

            It is at the front that she works.
            1. 0
              April 1 2026 12: 32
              It's even interesting... Maybe in the frontline zone?
              Even Moskvich 412, VAZ-2101, and T-62 are working at the front, but it's not a fact that you can rely on them...
              1. 0
                April 4 2026 00: 03
                Quote: tehnix
                It's even interesting... Maybe in the frontline zone?

                Right there.
  4. + 15
    19 March 2026 06: 42
    I understand the author is planning a series of articles – the BMP-1 is still in service... the T-55 is still in service... After the upbeat reports about thousands of "Armata" and "Koalitsiya" tanks that are about to be deployed tomorrow, we've reached this point...
    1. 0
      19 March 2026 20: 12
      It looks very much so. As for the Strela-10, it can, fortunately, destroy UAVs, but unfortunately, it is also... destroyed by them (and others).
  5. Owl
    -1
    19 March 2026 08: 32
    It has its missions, hits its targets, receives new missiles from Kalashnikov – a worthy, continuing life for the complex.
    1. 0
      22 March 2026 15: 01
      Exactly! While some are waiting for a state-of-the-art system that will detect and shoot down everything that flies, the domestic military-industrial complex is offering us Here and now A system capable of adequately countering air threats in its niche. Given that medium-class UAVs are never going to run out in modern warfare, the relevance of this system is only growing. In this regard, one never ceases to be amazed by the genius of Soviet engineers, who were able to create such versatile systems with enormous potential for modernization, reliable, effective, and affordable, and still in demand decades later.
  6. +1
    19 March 2026 08: 33
    Anyone who fights in the Tundra knows that this MTLB, with its photocontrast seeker, is very dangerous for aviation.
    Only he doesn’t have a radar, and he is forced to scan the horizon 360 degrees, which is archaic.
    1. +7
      19 March 2026 09: 17
      Optical detection has always been, is, and will be. The optical channel can't be called an anachronism. In this case, it would be more accurate to say that the system is highly specialized in target acquisition, using only optics. This could be considered a drawback. But the designers were aware of this from the start, and external target designation was implemented from the very first versions.
      I believe that Strela should be perceived as a part of the overall system; it is a launcher with limited search capabilities.
      If the entire system stops working, then the effectiveness of the Arrow also decreases, but this is not its problem, this is how the System was designed...
      As for the Strela itself, I hope that they will implement intelligent search for targets in the optical range, although it may already be there, since there is talk of some automation of processes.
      And since the system is passive in nature, it would be a good idea to also implement audio detection. This is a well-established concept, low in power consumption, and lightweight.
      1. 0
        23 March 2026 13: 12
        Visually searching for an air target at 360° is tiring for the operator.
        There is an OLS that could rotate 360 ​​degrees and provide target designation to the operator.
    2. +4
      19 March 2026 11: 05
      Quote: dragon772
      Only he doesn’t have a radar, and he is forced to scan the horizon 360 degrees, which is archaic.

      The SAM system shouldn't be "scanning the horizon." The SAM system shouldn't normally detect air targets—that's what the radar and radar system is for. The SAM system normally receives all target data from the command post.
      A SAM system is only one part of an air defense system. Yes, it's active and the most well-known—but it's still only one part. Its job is to receive target designation from the command post (where data from all detection systems is consolidated and targets are distributed among battalions), lock on to a target with its azimuth, elevation, and range known from an external target designator, and launch it once the target enters the kill zone. Even MANPADS operate in this manner, receiving centralized target designation from a tablet.
      For the Strela-10 SAMs, with their range, altitude, and optical seeker, the electro-optical target detection system is quite sufficient when operating in this mode.

      The Tundra's experience is in the operation of an air defense system in autonomous mode. That is, when the air defense system is completely destroyed, the air defense system operates on its own, emitting light in all directions and making itself a target for anti-aircraft missiles.
      1. 0
        23 March 2026 13: 15
        It's not quite like that in the Tundra. There are active fighters who spot a helicopter or plane through their optics and immediately provide targeting information. This is very helpful for the Strela in combat with aircraft.
  7. +7
    19 March 2026 08: 38
    No matter how much the author praises this SAM system, it's still worth noting that there have been repeated attempts to replace the Strela-10 or to create a practically "different" system based on it! Attempts have been made to equip the system with laser-guided SAMs! I believe that the latest (in time!) attempt to replace the Strela-10 is the army's proposal to use the Krona SAM system... The Strela-10 SAM system has the potential for further service... This requires an OES with a laser rangefinder, the ability to use: 1. SAMs from the Igla-S, Igla-N, and Verba MANPADS (ammunition will increase); 2. upgrade options for the 9M333 SAM (1. replacing the photocontrast sensor with a video camera, as A. Rodikov did; 2. introducing the capability of a laser homing head); 3. The ability to use missiles (9M133M-3 Kornet); 4. The ability to use interceptor drones, for example, like the Yolka and Molot types!
  8. -1
    19 March 2026 09: 44
    There is a modernized Strela-10, this is Sosna.
    The Strela-10 system is good for its niche, but there is a catch: it only works in visible conditions, meaning it is practically useless at night and in bad weather.
    1. 0
      19 March 2026 10: 08
      How useless? They introduced the IR channel as the main one, it doesn't care whether it's day or night. Obviously, it's better during the day, but it's also possible at night.
  9. The comment was deleted.
  10. +1
    19 March 2026 12: 59
    Quote: air wolf
    If you count in dollars, then you're a foreign agent and can go to hell.

    You look really menacing, as I can see...©
  11. +3
    19 March 2026 13: 16
    "Strela-10 air defense missile systems remain in service and perform combat missions." Other Soviet developments also remain in service. Meanwhile, our new "world's best, unparalleled, and ditto" weapon was created in single units for parades and exhibitions! And the funds allocated for new developments were embezzled, as evidenced by the arrests of former Defense Ministry leadership! negative "I'm sorry for the state!" request
  12. -1
    19 March 2026 14: 56
    Quote from alexoff
    fighter jets have not been seen in combating drones and missiles

    Exactly! Very accurately noted:
    UNNOTICED
    But the AESA characteristics allow for detection, and the cannon characteristics allow for shooting. The turbulence at supersonic speeds can break fragile UAV structures. Unfortunately, I can't tell you anything about the contrast between the RCS of a human scalp and the surface. The results have already been discussed.
  13. 0
    19 March 2026 15: 30
    Now even the Strela-1 would come in handy. Especially with the Igla or Verba.
  14. +1
    20 March 2026 08: 56
    I've always been surprised by a strange fact.
    Massive heavy rocket.
    And at the same time, the range and altitude are the same as those of MANPADS.
    Modernization of the missiles themselves has been needed for a very long time.
    But no.
    And this is strange.
    1. 0
      23 March 2026 13: 47
      I was also surprised, but on the other hand, as one contemporary said, “it’s possible, but why?”
      Optical guidance has a range of 10 km, so the operator won't see it and the missile won't lock on to the target. But MANPADS carry 1,5 kg of warhead, while this missile carries 5 kg.
      Five kilograms aboard would destroy any aircraft. And the larger equipment compartment offers greater potential.
      1. +1
        23 March 2026 18: 44
        Stationary optical stations can see the same helicopter at a distance of several tens of kilometers.
        IR homing heads capture targets at a range of tens of kilometers.
        The arrow looks weak against this background.
        It is possible to increase the destruction altitude to 10 km and the range to the same 10 km without any particular problems.
        Only by introducing a new, longer-range missile.
        The capabilities of the complex would increase exponentially.
        It is clear that the missile would be more expensive due to its more advanced seeker.
        Well then add two more containers to the PU.
        4 regular, two long-range.
        For the same Bayraktars, the current Arrow is a typical target that cannot respond.
        And Strela, with its longer-range missile, is already becoming a hunter of such UAVs.
    2. 0
      28 March 2026 18: 20
      Isn't using a rocket from the armored car an option? 75 kg versus 40 kg, sure, but the mtlb should be able to handle it.
      1. +1
        28 March 2026 18: 37
        The guidance principle is completely different.
        Half-Shell needs to be moved to the Arrow for it to work.
        The Arrow needs its own rocket. Based on the existing one, but modified.
  15. 0
    28 March 2026 18: 18
    It's a decent vehicle, especially considering the need for air defense in Russia's regions. The MTLB base can climb any hill right across the field and operate from there, whether with radar or missiles.
  16. 0
    April 13 2026 16: 41
    Quote: multicaat
    ...
    the guidance and control system for this whole mess

    It's true, both the Strela and Osa are used out of desperation because they have missiles in storage, and it doesn't matter that the components are from the last century and that the failure rate of the equipment in storage is 50/50. The difference in altitude and range from the Tor and Pantsir is not fundamental; they are all short-range systems, with only the MANPADS and heavy machine guns coming closer. Unlike the aforementioned systems, the Strela is not independent of production.
    The main problem now is the lack of continuous radar coverage and timely target designation, which the coolheads are taking full advantage of after completing the reconnaissance of the mattresses.