Iranian supercavitating torpedo "Khut"

11 822 18
Iranian supercavitating torpedo "Khut"
Rocket "Khut" at the exhibition in 2015. The head device-cavitator is covered with a protective cap.


Iran has blockaded the Strait of Hormuz and is threatening to prevent any attempt to transit it. To this end, they promise to use a variety of weapons, including special types. For example, several days ago, they reported the possibility of using submarine-launched missiles. This likely refers to the "Khut" missile, which is a class of underwater missiles or supercavitating torpedoes.



Promised measures


Iran is responding to US and Israeli aggression with more than just missile strikes. Several days ago, it closed the Strait of Hormuz to shipping, and vowed to crack down harshly on violations. Several vessels attempting to transit the strait have already been attacked with missiles. Furthermore, reports have emerged that the area has been mined.

On March 11, Deputy Commander of the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, General Ali Fadavi, revealed another means of combating violators. fleet may use a new missile. This device is launched from underwater and reaches speeds of approximately 100 m/s. The first launches could take place in the coming days.

General Fadavi did not specify the type of such weapons, its carriers, etc. However, the specifications provided suggest what kind of product was being discussed. Apparently, they were referring to the Hut-class underwater missile/supercavitating torpedo.

The question of carriers for such weapons is much simpler. In theory, any submarine equipped with a 533mm torpedo tube could use these weapons. The Iranian Navy has several ships with such a weapon. However, their condition and combat readiness after the events of recent days raise questions.


Soviet/Russian product "Shkval". The external resemblance is obvious.

However, it's possible that A. Fadavi was referring to a different weapon. For example, it could be some kind of underwater-launched anti-ship missile, currently unknown to the general public. This theory is also plausible, although it raises questions.

Several days have passed since the IRGC deputy commander's statements. During this time, Iran has repeatedly attacked foreign vessels attempting to transit the closed strait. The use of unmanned boats and missiles has been reported. However, no weapons similar to the previously mentioned underwater missile have yet been used. It is possible they will be used in the current operation later.

Underwater rocket


Of the two interpretations of the Iranian general's words, the one related to the Khut submarine missile is the most interesting. This version is noteworthy, at the very least, due to the class of such weapons and the stated performance characteristics. Discussion of the hypothetical use of such missiles/torpedoes and the implications is already underway on specialized websites and blogs.

According to available data, the future "Khut" ("Whale") torpedo was in development since at least the early 2000s. The Iranian torpedo was designed as an analogue of the Soviet/Russian VA-111 "Shkval" underwater missile. Moreover, significant external and design similarities have even led to speculation about the adoption of certain technologies or developments. However, due to general secrecy, all such information remains unknown.

Development of the Kit missile was completed in the mid-2000s. The first test launch took place in April 2006 during Iranian naval exercises. Subsequently, foreign media repeatedly reported on further combat training launches during various naval maneuvers. It should be noted that such information was infrequent, and each use of the Khut missile consistently attracted attention.


In October 2015, an exhibition of modern Iranian-made weapons and equipment was held in Tehran. At this event, the Khut torpedo was publicly demonstrated for the first time. The external similarity between the Iranian munition and the Russian Shkval was once again confirmed, but this was not disclosed.

Thus, the Khut supercavitating torpedo entered service with the Iranian Navy approximately 20 years ago. Since then, it has been used repeatedly in exercises, but no full-scale combat launches have yet been conducted. This situation could change at any moment—a similar weapon has been promised for use against shipping.

Technical appearance


The Khut is a missile designed for use by submarines against surface ships. This missile has several intriguing features and utilizes unusual operating principles. This allows for superior performance and should ensure high combat effectiveness.

The Iranian missile has a cylindrical body with a conical nose fairing. The outer surface is smooth and has a minimum of protruding parts. A disc-shaped cavitation device is mounted on the nose fairing. Retractable rudders are located near the tail.

The dimensions and weight of the Khut are unknown. A similar torpedo, the Shkval, has a caliber of 533 mm and a length of 8 meters. Its launch weight is 2,7 tons. Apparently, the Iranian torpedo has the same or similar parameters.


The torpedo/missile is equipped with a solid-fuel motor. Likely, like the VA-111, it uses a hydroreactive propellant charge: it ignites and burns due to a reaction with seawater. Previously, it was reported that the Kit could reach speeds of up to 320 km/h. Recent claims have suggested a speed of 100 m/s, which corresponds to 360 km/h. Interestingly, in this regard, the Iranian development is inferior to the Shkval, which is claimed to have a speed of 370-375 km/h.

The range and launch capability are unknown. The specific propulsion system should limit this parameter. For example, the VA-111, depending on the modification, has a range of no more than 10-12 km. In this regard, underwater missiles are inferior to traditional torpedoes.

To achieve high-speed movement through water, the torpedo uses the principle of cavitation. Its warhead contains a special disk-shaped device that creates disturbances in the oncoming liquid flow. A gas cavity forms behind it, enveloping the entire missile. While moving, the "Khut" barely comes into contact with the water, dramatically reducing drag and enabling high speeds.

Due to its unique configuration, such a torpedo cannot be equipped with a homing system. Only basic control systems ensuring movement along a predetermined course are possible.

The torpedo's dimensions allow it to accommodate a high-explosive charge weighing approximately 200 kg. Furthermore, the Soviet-designed Shkval could also carry a special warhead of significant power. This was intended to compensate for its limited accuracy.

Advantages and limitations


The Khut missile's key feature is its high speed. The underwater "flight" to its maximum range takes no more than 1-1,5 minutes. The enemy has minimal time to detect and respond to such a threat. Moreover, a large ship simply won't have time to evade a high-speed torpedo, significantly increasing the likelihood of a hit. The relatively heavy warhead is capable of inflicting significant damage on its target.


However, the Khut has several controversial features and obvious shortcomings. Some of these are due to the design, while others are related to the state and capabilities of the Navy. Whether these issues will allow the torpedo to realize its advantages in practice remains a big question.

First, the question of launch vehicles arises. Apparently, any submarine with 533mm torpedo tubes can carry the underwater missile. The Iranian Navy operates three Project 877 diesel-electric submarines of Soviet and Russian construction, as well as up to 20 Ghadir-class submarines of its own design. It is unknown how many of these Pennants remain in service and capable of performing combat missions after enemy strikes.

The Kit's high speed is offset by its limited launch range. The carrier submarine would have to approach within 8-10 km of its target. While this wouldn't be a problem when attacking a merchant vessel, attempting to attack warships carries serious consequences. An Iranian diesel-electric submarine could be detected while approaching the launch site, with obvious negative consequences.

The solid-fuel rocket motor creates a lot of noise, revealing the torpedo and its carrier submarine. A launched "Khut" threatens only one ship, while the other members of the formation can engage in anti-submarine warfare, and their task won't be too difficult.

Potential and its application


The Iranian Navy has a wide range of munitions for engaging surface and underwater targets. They even possess technologically sophisticated weapons, such as underwater missiles and autonomous vehicles. Some of these weapons are already being used in the current operation.

Combat use of Khut submarine-launched missiles may begin in the coming days. The results are still unknown. However, the initial launches will allow us to assess the overall potential of such weapons in a real conflict, as well as their ability to influence enemy shipping and naval strategy.
18 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 0
    16 March 2026 05: 21
    If our superiors don't decide to help the Persians, then we'll be next. NATO will easily reach the Urals, where it's difficult to cross the mountains, and the capital will be somewhere in Novosibirsk. We'll see in 5 years. negative
    And the torpedo is good 👍
    1. +1
      16 March 2026 06: 17
      So, let's say they decided to help the Persians, what next? The air is blocked. The Caspian? The ports are under bombardment. Should we dig a subway to Tehran?
      We still need to somehow supply or evacuate Tartus and Latakia, what the hell Iran?!
      1. +1
        16 March 2026 07: 02
        The range, frankly speaking, is so-so... but we'll see how they use it
        1. +5
          16 March 2026 08: 10
          Quote: Civil
          The range, frankly speaking, is so-so... but we'll see how they use it

          No way. The Varshavyankas have been destroyed.
          It's better to launch a regular torpedo against a tanker; it has a longer range and homing capability.
        2. -1
          16 March 2026 09: 26
          Quote: Civil
          Let's see how they will apply it

          Ideally, from an underwater drone, but they all seem small, will they be able to handle such a dummy?
    2. +3
      16 March 2026 08: 51
      Well, I don't know...
      The article gives the impression that using it against warships would be suicide for the Persians.
      But for trading purposes, it's overkill. Something simpler would be fine for that...
      But otherwise, it's good, yes.
    3. +1
      16 March 2026 12: 50
      You made a mistake with the post, dear sir.
  2. 0
    16 March 2026 06: 30
    It looks great on display. But what will it be like in action? If they manage to land a hit on the enemy's side, I'll be giving them a standing ovation. I can't wait.
  3. -1
    16 March 2026 07: 19
    What are they planning to use there? The fleet is destroyed, the submarines are obsolete, against the most powerful navy in the world. Are you serious? They should have used them on the very first day of the war, sinking the aircraft carrier. This is just a fantasy of how it could have happened.
  4. +3
    16 March 2026 08: 21
    The Iranian military's statement about its intention to use "underwater missiles" was already "voiced" on VO! I suggested back then that they were most likely Iranian missile-torpedoes like the Russian "Shkval"... I was criticized! And then there's the article by "my like-minded person"... so where's the "angry criticism" directed at the author of the article now?
  5. -5
    16 March 2026 09: 21
    Author, you know too much - you journalists have this stupid habit of sticking your nose where you're not invited and blurting out everything you're not asked to.
  6. +2
    16 March 2026 10: 05
    An engineer's thought: what if the carrier is a semi-submersible submarine with a single torpedo on board? How can it reach attack range and launch without risk to the crew due to its absence? And, as a complete mockery of the ami, control via Starlink!
    1. +1
      16 March 2026 17: 53
      Quote: Dmitriy22
      and if the carrier is a semi-submersible submarine with a single torpedo
      Or even a fully submersible one, like this one, for example (1). Strait (2). Ability to wait for targeting on the bottom. In sufficient quantity. Coordinates and attack time received. Five-knot. Aircraft carrier taken into a five-kilometer circle. Reached a depth of 30 meters and raised buoys for periscope guidance. Cancellation is still possible at this stage.
      Consumption twenty.
      Then they returned to recharge.
  7. +1
    16 March 2026 11: 39
    So Iran no longer has a navy.
  8. +2
    16 March 2026 16: 59
    I remember the Norwegians sank a heavy German cruiser with torpedoes, without any ships, using shore-based torpedoes. No one's stopping them from firing from under the shore in the strait; everything is within range from the islands there.
    1. 0
      16 March 2026 23: 33
      Well, between the Drebek Strait with its fortified area, where the Norwegians sank Blucher, and the Strait of Hormuz, there are still some "small" differences in both size and terrain.
  9. Lad
    -2
    16 March 2026 21: 04
    This is far from the first article on this site about Iran allegedly possessing some kind of wonder weapon that it hasn't used yet, for some reason. But one day, Iran will use it, oh my... Why it hasn't used it yet, when it no longer has an air force or a navy—no one can say. I just really wish Iran had this wonder weapon (or whatever it's called?). It's all according to the same principle: saying the word "halva" too many times makes your mouth sweet. True, there's no halva, but who has ever stopped that?
  10. 0
    16 March 2026 22: 53
    Anything can happen...Anything can happen...
    You can go on the attack...
    If only I could stay alive! (c)

    The whole point is that they're trying to present Iran's Khouth as an offensive weapon... Well, against civilian vessels (tankers and bulk carriers)—maybe it'll work. But getting within 10 kilometers of Avik—that's highly doubtful.
    The author cites our VA-111. But it was loaded onto strategic missiles and intended to break through the PLC formation when it was no longer possible to exit the search zone. And that was under combat conditions, because it carried the SBP.
    And what will the Persians present to the AVU, surrounded by the PLC!?
    What doubts are gnawing at the men!
    AHA.