Development of the BEV "Ratnik"

12 982 59
Development of the BEV "Ratnik"
Soldiers wearing early-version Ratnik uniforms. Victory Day Parade 2022.


In the first half of the 2010s, the Russian Army began introducing the latest combat equipment for servicemen, the "Ratnik," into combat units. The introduction of new uniforms, various devices, and modern weapons significantly improved all key performance indicators of units and subunits. Furthermore, the "Ratnik" has been repeatedly improved using new technologies and developments, as well as operational experience.



First stages


It's worth remembering that development of a new combat-weapon system for ground forces began in the late 2000s. In the early 2010s, the industry introduced the finished "Ratnik" kit, and it immediately underwent the necessary testing, including with combat units. In the first half of the decade, the new combat-weapon system entered serial production, and the equipment began to be delivered en masse to the troops.

In parallel with the launch of the series, the first work on improving the Ratnik was underway. Thus, the development of a new rifle continued. weapons For inclusion in the BEV, individual components were improved, etc. By the end of the decade, this led to the emergence of the so-called second generation of equipment. It was fundamentally no different from the basic version, but had a number of important advantages.


Military personnel participating in a special operation at the 2025 parade. The equipment corresponds to the current version of the Ratnik.

At the turn of the decade, news of the next major modernization of the combat vehicle became known. The Ratnik-3 was planned to incorporate a number of fundamentally new components that would simplify various missions. Barring any difficulties, this equipment was expected to be adopted by the mid-1920s and implemented in parallel with the first versions of the Ratnik.

Ways of development


Perhaps the most notable innovation in the early stages of Ratnik's development was the replacement of the standard small arms. Initially, the AK-74M assault rifle was the primary personal weapon. It was later supplemented with new sights and then replaced with the new AK-12.

At one point, the development of a new assault rifle for our infantry encountered certain difficulties and was significantly delayed. However, all issues were ultimately resolved, and riflemen received a new weapon with improved combat and operational characteristics. Furthermore, development of attachments for assault rifles and machine guns continued.


One of the variants of the "Ratnik" set

The standard electronics of the equipment were gradually improved. This primarily involved improving serial products based on operational experience. New communications equipment, tactical systems, and other equipment were also developed. It should be noted that, due to their complexity and high cost, the electronics were delivered to combat units over a relatively long period. However, the mere fact of receiving them had a positive impact on the units' combat effectiveness.

Uniforms and gear were also improved. During the testing and early implementation phases, complaints were received about the quality or design of individual uniform elements, footwear, etc. Gradually, the Ministry of Defense and industry corrected these shortcomings.

New Challenges


In February 2022, the Russian army launched a special operation to defend Donbas. This gave it the opportunity to test its current combat and economic capabilities in a full-scale military operation and reap all the benefits associated with it. The accumulation of useful experience accelerated significantly, which was an additional positive factor.


During combat operations, service members expressed a desire to receive additional equipment and systems in addition to their standard gear. They purchased the necessary items themselves or received them from volunteer organizations. Volunteers and mobilized personnel approached their equipment in a similar manner. Preparing for deployment to the front, they assembled their own equipment.

Thus, in a short period of time, the army experienced a lack of standardization in combat equipment. Various versions of the standard "Ratnik" kits, standard combat equipment with non-standard supplements, and custom-assembled kits were all in use. This lack of uniformity imposed certain limitations and created difficulties. At the same time, it became possible to evaluate and compare various products in combat zones.

No later than the second half of 2022, the Ministry of Defense drew its first conclusions and began refining the standard army combat and economic system. According to available data, over the past period, the ministry has repeatedly updated the Ratnik configuration, implemented new approaches, and so on.

Current Solutions


The first significant innovations began to be implemented centrally by the end of 2022. With the onset of winter, deliveries of new thermal underwear and outerwear based on membrane technologies began. This significantly improved service comfort and mission performance during the cold season. Simultaneously, improvements were made to other items of uniform for other seasons.


A sniper-gunner with a non-standard set of equipment, individually selected

Standard footwear has changed significantly. Previously, high boots of the traditional military style, made of leather or similar materials, were used. Experience with these boots demonstrated the feasibility and necessity of introducing other materials, such as Cordura. Manufacturing technologies have also changed, resulting in new types of boots that combine comfort and reliability. Furthermore, their weight has been reduced by tens of percent.

Protective equipment has changed significantly in recent years. For example, the standard 6B45 bulletproof vest, part of the Ratnik combat armored vehicle, has undergone several modifications that have improved its performance. Specifically, it now has the ability to be quickly discarded in an emergency.

New protective options then emerged, such as plate vests with the ability to install suitable protective elements. These vests, in turn, utilize ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene (UHMWPE) alongside or in place of metal and ceramics. While maintaining the required protection parameters, these vests are 20-40 percent lighter than traditional designs.

The 6B47 armored helmet is also being refined and improved. As early as 2023-24, the design of the under-body device was modified, improving comfort during extended wear. Later, mounts for additional devices were added to the helmet.


A UAV operator in modern winter gear

Despite all the difficulties, development of the Ratnik-3 project continued. In 2024-25, individual components of this combat-ready system began to enter trial operation. First and foremost, the troops received electronic devices—navigation, communications, and other equipment. More complex components of the equipment may also enter service in the near future.

While existing products were being modified and new ones were being developed, larger, fundamental changes were taking place. For example, in 2022, the country's leadership decided to completely transition to domestically produced equipment and gear. This significantly simplified procurement and delivery, and also accelerated the systematization of experience and product improvement.

New materials and manufacturing technologies are being actively implemented. In recent years, industry has mastered the production of uniforms from new fabrics, the use of protective material treatments, and so on. Significant progress has been made in the field of protective equipment.


Helmet from the Ratnik combat vehicle with additional devices

Plans for the future


In the past, the Ministry of Defense and relevant industrial organizations made plans for the further development of domestic combat combat equipment. This included further upgrades to the Ratnik, as well as the creation of new, similar combat equipment with improved parameters, expanded configuration, and so on. For objective reasons, the implementation of these plans had to be postponed for some time.

Nevertheless, the work continued, and implementation of its results is expected in the foreseeable future. There are reports of the possible commencement of military trials of exoskeletons facilitating movement or handling loads, the development of new electronics, and so on.

The existing Ratnik system is planned to be supplemented with new devices in the coming months or years. Subsequently, new similar projects may be launched. Nevertheless, the current combat-weapon system, actively used by the army, is generally adequate for its intended purposes. However, the need for further refinement and improvement cannot be ruled out—and such measures are being undertaken virtually continuously.
59 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. + 12
    22 March 2026 05: 19
    It's good that someone realized that soldiers are not voiceless singers with silicone breasts and removed the cleavage from their uniforms.
    1. +4
      22 March 2026 08: 51
      Yeah, yeah... I also don't understand what that is in the first photo. You have to think of something like that. If the cutout was done like that on purpose, then that designer should be forced to wear it for the rest of his life. And if that cuff was done for a parade, then there are no words... But I also wonder what kind of weapon the soldiers are carrying. At first glance, it looks like a Vintorez, but the sights and stock are different. Although the photo does resemble it. The bottom one doesn't have the additional sights. These days, soldiers should definitely have a whole arsenal instead of just one gun—almost like a cop in the US—they just don't have a machine gun or grenade launcher.
      1. +3
        22 March 2026 12: 27
        This is a BNZ 6B46 chest rig (with the option of installing an armor plate). It is used where the 6B43 body armor is not needed (for long-distance missions).
        AS assault rifle with 1P87 collimator
        It's impossible to carry a whole arsenal; the cops only have a pistol.
      2. +2
        22 March 2026 21: 36
        This "ceremonial turn" is for showing off the vest belay In violation of the order "On the procedure for wearing uniforms." If it's a parade, then the uniform is a dress uniform... but... the master is the boss.
  2. +2
    22 March 2026 05: 21
    A video has surfaced online of the assassination of Anton Zheltobrukh, a sergeant with the 8th elite regiment of the Ukrainian Special Operations Forces and call sign "Aquaman."
    He was in full gear...in the rifle range he was cut down with a burst...a grenade was added.
    So, having a bulletproof vest does not guarantee survival in battle.
  3. +9
    22 March 2026 05: 24
    And in my army days - a tunic, a cap, and a badge with a star. And tarpaulin boots for eight months... Nostalgia.
  4. + 24
    22 March 2026 06: 14
    The article as a whole is from the era of tank biathlons, and has no equivalent. I acquired the equipment and uniform myself, tailoring the kit for mine clearing and combat vehicle missions myself. I bought most of it myself. I only saw the Ratnik kit on my brother, the driver (my comrade from the first war fitted me with it). I can't go on any further, and it's disgusting to write... hi
  5. +8
    22 March 2026 06: 34
    We've always had plans for the future, at all times. It's a bit sad, though. It's 2010, autumn, a Siberian city, Sunday, and I'm still a student, going to play airsoft. I already had a vest made of real Cordura, and back then it wasn't comparable to what we have today. I had a membrane jacket, I had a ceramic stove (I hadn't earned or saved up for a second one yet). Army 2020-present, we've discovered membrane, Cordura, and much more. Curtain call...
    1. -2
      22 March 2026 12: 20
      6B13 bulletproof vest with a ceramic plate, early 2000s
      Mountain uniform kit with membrane, mid-2000s
  6. +4
    22 March 2026 07: 03
    What's that helmet covering? Your crown? Is that from Ratnik?
    Is the photo informative again? It's a FAST police helmet made in the USA.
    1. +4
      22 March 2026 10: 24
      Quote: Konnick
      This is a FAST police helmet made in the USA.

      And the fighter in the penultimate picture
      A UAV operator in modern winter gear

      In the NATO Gen-2 Multicam. I've had one myself for about 15 years.
      1. -2
        22 March 2026 12: 07
        In the US, Multicam camouflage is not officially in service, although half of the armed forces have switched to it on their own initiative.

        There is no multicam NATO, there is just multicam
        1. +2
          23 March 2026 08: 00
          Well, we have the internet... why write such nonsense? Yes, Multicam lost the competition to the "universal" in 2004, but in 2010 it was adopted first for the contingent in Afghanistan, and since 2015, Multicam has officially become the primary weapon for everyone except the Marines. So you're wrong about that.
          I'll immediately respond to the message below about helmets (and yes, they could have used the internet here too) - American soldiers don't buy FAST helmets with their own money; what you've seen is either special forces wearing them as standard equipment, or regular soldiers in ECH.
          Looking back, in the early 00s, special forces received a new helmet, the MICH, which later became the basis for the Army's ACH. Due to the standard distribution of active earpieces in special forces since 2004 (even slightly earlier), soldiers began cutting off the "ears" of their helmets. I myself have an MICH with "ears" and PELTOR Comtac 2 earpieces, and putting them on together is a 5-minute quest, preferably with a mirror—it's long and tedious. If this had to be done "in the field," I'd have abandoned one or the other. So, first, the "half-ear" (MICH 2001h) and "earless" (MICH 2002) MICH helmets went into production, and in the early 10s, special forces received the FAST. When active earpieces began arriving in the US Army in 2012, the Army received their own version, the ECH.
          Regarding the article—it's unclear what it's about. It's all circles around. Judging by photos and videos from the SVO zone, the "Ratnik" as a single kit has ceased to exist outside of parades. Individual components can still be found, but it's unclear whether they were issued recently or "from old stock" and inherited. If you look at the reviews of the parts that leaked through flea markets onto the civilian market, they're likely some of the worst examples of what's available. But overall, they were issued as standard, which is good enough...
          1. +2
            23 March 2026 08: 27
            Quote: parma
            Judging by the photos and videos from the SVO zone, today the "Ratnik" uniform as a single set has ceased to exist outside of parades.

            That's right, here's a multicam and..."universal"
            1. +4
              23 March 2026 09: 43
              Well, actually, your photo shows what I was writing about...
              It's hard to judge, but it looks like there's nothing standard about the uniform and boots, probably just olive drab. As for equipment (aside from pouches, which are a real pain), the first one has nothing standard, the second one has a standard 6b45 body armor and some kind of "civilian" FAST equivalent, the third one has a standard 6b47 helmet, and the last one seems to have nothing standard and a "civilian" equivalent of the "eared" MICH-2000.
          2. -2
            26 March 2026 08: 15
            There is no such thing as NATO Multicam, there is Multicam camouflage developed by *utter crap*, the US Army stole this camouflage from this company and adopted it for equipment under the name UCP, so Multicam is not a US Army camouflage.

            The YouTube video shows a US soldier (not a Special Forces soldier) in an ops-core helmet. These helmets aren't issued to the military, meaning they were purchased with their own money.

            According to reviews, the 6B45 body armor and 6B47 helmets are excellent kits, but it is also clear that they are now outdated (developed in 2007), as is, for example, the US Army's IOTV, and are currently supplying the KBS *Strelok*, the best set of equipment in the world.
            1. +2
              26 March 2026 09: 54
              I understand you're having trouble with the internet... so let me inform you: Multicam was originally developed by the Krays in conjunction with the US Army Research Directorate. They have nothing in common with UCP (Russian for "Universal Camouflage Pattern"), other than the competition that Multicam lost, so there's no theft involved. Multicam has been replacing UCP since 2019 under the designation OCP (Russian for "Operational Camouflage Pattern"). By the way, regarding theft, look up our domestic "MOX," "Surpat," "Spektr," and other such things; you won't be pleased...
              Regarding FASTs "purchased with their own money" by US soldiers. Below I'll attach a photo of a "Special Forces" FAST and an "Army" ECH. Find the 10 differences (they exist, by the way).
              Regarding the 6b45 and 6b47, both appeared around 2014. Have you seen them, twirled them in your hands, or worn them? I've tried them... And while I have some taste in the body armor—the KAP isn't comfortable and doesn't work, and I don't like the overall ergonomics compared to, say, the AVS vests (by the way, the Special Operations Forces have always preferred AVS-like vests to the standard 6b45)—I have major complaints about the helmet. Specifically, the suspension system—it's awkward to adjust, doesn't work with the active hearing protection, etc.
              Regarding the KBS "Strelok," I've only seen photos and videos. The kit looks good, I can't say anything more about the quality or whether it's "the best in the world," but it's definitely not the first. The Americans are already replacing their IOTV (they have everything the same except the weight distribution system, and it's already 20 years old), then again, the Krais released their CPC kit with weight distribution, and all this stuff is still from 2010... and our Yekaterinburg company MVS (made by cel "the old way," modular military systems "the new way") has been offering its "metronome" for 5-7 years now.
              P.S.: Watch and read less "hurray-patriots", try to figure it out for yourself.
              1. -2
                26 March 2026 10: 49
                6b43 and 6b47 appeared in 2009
                You simply don't know how to adjust the 6B47; even the adjusted SSH-68 sits well on your head.
                I might have mixed up the name, but the NATO multicam doesn't exist and isn't in service with the American army.
                Moss is our own invention, the American one is Atax-crap

                Don't you see the difference between the IHPS helmet and the helmet you showed in the picture?
                And who cares who released it when? I'm talking about deliveries to the army. At the moment, KBS Rifleman is the best, but the Americans took some kind of MSV substance.
                Watch and read less American *poop-patriots*, try to think with your own head
                1. -2
                  26 March 2026 10: 54
                  And I noticed, judging by the video, that US soldiers practically never use active headphones, and even during shooting practice they use earplugs.
                2. +1
                  26 March 2026 14: 36
                  Continuing with the Multicam—did I mention "Multicam NATO"? I told you the history of this postern and how it ended up in the US Army. Just look up OCP and who developed it (hint: Cry Precision). It's actually found its way into many different armies in one form or another, each with its own unique characteristics, and that's normal.
                  Regarding the "Ratnik" elements. Whether they appeared in 2009 or 2007 is up to you to decide... Oh, and don't confuse the 6b43 and 6b7m, which appeared in 2007-2009, with the 6b45 and 6b47 (they're actually very similar), which were introduced in 2011-2012 and went into service in 2014.
                  In my 10 years of airsoft, I've tried and worn so much gear that I know how to adjust it and can tell you which one is really more comfortable (in some cases, it's more a matter of taste, but not with domestic helmets).
                  As for "who cares who released it when?" - it makes a big difference. If something is released earlier, it means the manufacturer already has experience and reasons to continue using it or to change it, deeming it obsolete. Many of the solutions in the Ratnik kit had been around for 10 years by the time it was released and had fallen into disuse.
                  Regarding the IHPS, I'm glad you found another American helmet online. Now you might understand that the FAST is the helmet of choice for special forces, the ECH for the Marines, and the IHPS for the US Army, and are issued as standard issue, even though they're virtually identical visually. I'm glad the "buy your own" issue has been resolved.
                  Regarding the "best kit," etc., what didn't you like about the MSV? (Besides the fact that it's American-made). In my opinion, the idea of ​​a kit for the entire army is sound! The kit allows you to select and customize it. For reconnaissance/snipers, etc., you can make the lightest possible "low-profile" vest, practically combat-ready and unsharpened (if these specialists are engaged in combat, the situation is already critical); for regular line units, you can assemble a standard "plate carrier"; for patrols and similar missions where light shrapnel is likely, there's a combat shirt with soft armor (our private companies are also trying to produce something like this, but not many yet); for assault units and urban combat, there are additional protective elements and a weight distribution system. And all of this has been standardly issued to all US Army personnel for the past seven years, depending on their position. In our case, "riflemen" have been issued to units for the last two years, and until recently, the volumes weren't encouraging.
                  PS: As the owner of three body armor vests and three helmets, I can say this: there is no "best in the world"; there is equipment that meets modern realities and equipment that doesn't. So, I would call the Ratnik (pre-22 Ratnik) unsuitable for modern realities, and now the Ratnik (Ratnik) has ceased to exist as a single set of equipment.
                  1. -2
                    26 March 2026 14: 52
                    Have you forgotten how the discussion started? The commentator mentioned Multicam NATO, and I responded that there is no Multicam NATO.

                    How can you know about modern realities? The KBS Ratnik is a great kit, and the KBS Strelok is the best in the world. The American kit is crap and doesn't correspond to modern realities.

                    What did you miss there if the video showed airmobile soldiers, some in new crap helmets, some in earless ops-cors bought with their own money, and you can't even tell the difference between an IHPS helmet and an earless ops-cor (it's the shape of the helmet, I don't know the name, most likely Chinese), that's how the specialist works

                    and what has fallen out of use: armored helmets, body armor, active headphones, glasses, knee protection, multi-tools, flashlights, pouches—what is no longer used
                    1. +1
                      26 March 2026 15: 42
                      The conversation started with you claiming that the Multicam isn't in US service, to which I countered, directly quoting you: "Well, we have the internet... why write such nonsense? Yes, the Multicam lost the 2004 competition to the "universal" version, but in 2010 it was adopted first for the contingent in Afghanistan, and since 2015, the Multicam has officially become the primary weapon for everyone except the Marines. So you're wrong about that." There was never any mention of some "NATO Multicam"; you made that up on the fly in the post above.

                      I've tried and used all the main components of the Ratnik kit—the body armor, RPS, helmet, backpack, goggles, knee pads, and earmuffs. They were conceptually outdated when they were introduced in 2015, and even then, they reluctantly kept up with modern trends. The KBS "Strelok" isn't part of the Ratnik kit and hasn't even replaced it; it's a product from a specific manufacturer, adopted as a supplement to the Ratnik kit! Moreover, the solution isn't entirely optimal (there are both a matter of taste and real issues, such as the placement of the KAP on the front panel). Frankly, it's overly expensive compared to even domestic competitors, but it's better than what was available or Chinese replicas. I can't even imagine how you draw your conclusions about the inferiority of American equipment or the excellence of ours, as I have no evidence. Are you 5-7 years old?

                      How did you conclude that the soldiers of the American airmobile unit bought their helmets "with their own money"? Let me give you a little background: Ops-core is an American equipment manufacturer, and their FAST helmet model was born out of a joint development program with the US Army called the Mich helmet. The ECH and IHPS also came from this program. The only Chinese parts are replicas, as many people want to use the same term as "American special forces!!" And yes, I'm not an expert on American helmets to be able to distinguish them visually, but you're much closer to an amateur than I am to an expert.

                      Are new recruits now issued the Ratnik kit, especially in full? If you look at photos/I've seen them from the SVO zone, I'd bet 20% would have even one element of the Ratnik kit! So yes, the Ratnik kit has effectively ceased to be a unified set of equipment.

                      P.S.: Given your lack of logic, reasoning, knowledge, or even an attempt at a rational conversation, I suggest we leave this discussion at that. You're acting like a preschooler; I see no point in discussing this further.
                      1. -2
                        26 March 2026 16: 01
                        Multicam is not in service with the US Army because the US Army did not want to pay the company and adopted a camouflage pattern based on something called USP or something like that.
                        Multicam is the name of the company's camouflage,

                        There is no *NATO* multicam

                        The Ratnik kit was produced in 50 sets per year, and of course, not everyone can have it.

                        You determine the modernity of the sets based on your own feelings, but for some reason you forbid others. What kind of discussion is this?

                        You write one thing to me, you write about something else and try to insult me, Internet hero.

                        Well, you only provide your feelings and not evidence, and everyone has different feelings.
                      2. +1
                        27 March 2026 10: 57
                        Let me reiterate: UCP is not Multicam or a derivative thereof. Multicam was developed by a private company with US Army funding for the US Army, but was not selected at the time. Fifteen years later, the US Army returned to it and adopted it under the designation OCP, period! OCP is the military designation for Multicams, like the M-16 for the AR-15, or the "Lynx" for the Italian Iveco LMV armored vehicle (they're entirely Italian, ours only had the "screwdriver" assembly).

                        Once again, I've used this gear and can tell you what's wrong with it (I'll write about it tonight if I'm in the mood). By "personal preference," I mean solutions like standard Molle or Molle-minus. When a helmet's suspension system is 50 years old, it's an outdated and poor solution. Period.

                        You're telling me nonsense about American rapid reaction forces buying helmets with their own money. I tell you you're mistaken; they've been issued these helmets for several years now. You also write that the Americans use a "pirated" copy of Multicam, designated UCP, to which I reply that it's a different, outdated camouflage, while the Americans use a fully licensed Multicam (by the way, that's a good question: what's the deal with our licensing for it?) designated OCP. Where did I say anything different?

                        Selecting equipment isn't an academic discipline; it's based on facts and personal experience/preferences. That's why I say that the KBS "Strelok," like any product, has its share of controversial decisions. The Ministry of Defense's choice of this particular manufacturer could be for a variety of reasons—its merger with the Kalashnikov Concern, its mass production capabilities, its own fabric production facility, quality, cost, and even plain old corruption! And we'll never know for sure why this particular kit is purchased and not from ARS Arma, Vartek, MVS, Anna Tactical, and a million others. And all these facts don't make it better or worse, but it's certainly not the first Dan kit of this kind in Russia!
                        As for the new American equipment, the facts indicate that the decisions were made correctly, but there is no way to personally verify the level of implementation.
    2. -2
      22 March 2026 12: 13
      Judging by the YouTube video, American soldiers are buying these helmets instead of their ASN helmets, of course.
  7. +4
    22 March 2026 07: 35
    I wonder who made the parade participants smile? Or do those standing on the podium lack smiles? They probably picked up the habit from the Americans; they smile constantly. But at parades, Americans don't smile. It's much better when a soldier looks stern and sullen.
    1. -4
      22 March 2026 12: 08
      It's much better when they smile.
  8. +4
    22 March 2026 07: 36
    The Russian army continues to painstakingly refine its soldier's uniform, while China and the US are starting to churn out millions of combat robots—we're on the right track, comrades!
    1. -4
      22 March 2026 12: 11
      The ground-based robotic complex (GRTC) "Courier" is successfully used by the "Center" troop group in the Krasnoarmeysk direction of the special military operation.

      The US Army is returning to its historic "Army Green" uniform. The new uniform is slated to become mandatory for all soldiers by 2028.
  9. + 11
    22 March 2026 08: 32
    Meanwhile, fighters in the SVO are equipped mainly with their own hard-earned money.
    1. -4
      22 March 2026 11: 46
      equipment is purchased in any army in the world
      American soldiers deployed to Iraq are forced to purchase body armor out of pocket, the Associated Press reports. In many cases, families shell out several thousand dollars for the protective gear.

      Israeli reservists are complaining about a shortage of quality uniforms and body armor. Some relatives of reservists have launched a fundraising campaign to purchase tactical gear and other essentials. Donations are coming from both Israeli residents and citizens of other countries. They are purchasing body armor, helmets, knee pads, tactical goggles, sights and other firearms accessories, thermal underwear, helmet-mounted flashlights, and other equipment from the United States.
      1. +6
        22 March 2026 12: 21
        So what? Are they being looked up to? We don't even have a general mobilization; people are volunteering. There are about 700-800 of us, and we still can't provide everything we need and need. The payments seem large, but half of them go on ammunition and a lot of other things.
        1. -1
          22 March 2026 12: 34
          They called for 100 and, as we see, were unable to provide them with equipment.

          If you want to get more comfortable equipment, you can spend half of your payments on equipment. If you don't want to spend it, you'll get a cocoon/monolith module and a 100/20 cap.

          There's no need to compare ourselves, you just need to understand that everyone has problems with equipment during mobilization (even the Pentagon with a budget of 1 trillion)
    2. 0
      22 March 2026 21: 41
      Yes, I saw it with my own eyes...at the local military store. I bought myself an army sweater))) Mabuta from 8 thousand.
    3. 0
      24 March 2026 10: 11
      Yeah, it's all much simpler than with the Ministry of Defense.
      We buy 2 square meter sheets of titanium alloy VT-20 or VT-23, 3 mm or 3,5 mm thick.
      We send it for cutting and receive a finished armored suit similar to the FSB's Voin-KM with a protection area of ​​1,8 square meters, weighing 28 kg
      with all-round protection against B-32 7,62x54 bullets
      + fiberglass and composite impregnation to prevent the protection from coming into contact with steel
      + we order a lump with pockets for protective elements, adjustment straps, built-in tourniquets (this is already unnecessary)
  10. +6
    22 March 2026 08: 34
    Make a normal medical-surgical kit for a soldier!
    1. -1
      22 March 2026 12: 36
      You don't need a surgical one; you have to study for many years to become a surgeon, but the APPI-7 first aid kit is quite up to par.
      1. +4
        22 March 2026 12: 58
        As far as I understand, it doesn't have, for example, an occlusive patch or a decompression needle. But pneumothorax is the second-largest cause of death from wounds after blood loss. There are also burn treatments, and so on.
        1. 0
          22 March 2026 13: 10
          Well, anyone who knows how to use this can add to it. Most soldiers probably don't know how to use a needle. The medic's bag contains these patches and needles, and the medic knows how to use them correctly.
          The individual anti-chemical package IPP-11 is designed to neutralize toxic and irritating substances on human skin and on personal protective equipment, and to treat THERMAL and chemical burns of the skin;
          1. +3
            22 March 2026 13: 25
            It's easy to learn, it's not that hard. If you want your comrade to survive, you'll do the wrong thing.

            IPP-11 is no replacement for specialized burn treatments.

            But overall, yes, you have to put together your own first aid kit. All sorts of hemostatic sponges, Keloks granules with an applicator, and so on. It's not cheap, and the pouch is hard to close afterwards. What else can you do?

            You also need to choose a pouch. It needs to be detachable, have the right compartments, and so on. But there are plenty of those available now, and the price is reasonable. It would also be nice to attach a Nofe memory card to the external molle. And there are many other things. And most importantly, at least buy some literature on the subject and read it, not to mention practice. Otherwise, it's all worthless.
            1. +1
              22 March 2026 14: 16
              I watched a YouTube video from Afghanistan: when a British Marine was wounded, the rest of the Marines, even with first aid kits and training, could only shout, "Medic, medic..."
              Sticking a needle into a person's lungs is hardly easy
              The main thing is tourniquets and hemostatic agents, they are in the APPI-7 first aid kit
  11. + 13
    22 March 2026 10: 03
    Ultra-high molecular weight polyethylene is used in protection along with metal and ceramics or instead of them

    Based on what's currently on sale, the picture is as follows. We're not considering Chinese slabs. BR5s like Granita are heavy, at least 3.4 kg each, with a larger area of ​​3.7 kg, and quite expensive. Shchyolkovo slabs, for example, are the most expensive on Ozon – they're asking 30,000-35,000 rubles each. Tekhinkom, Taktik, and similar slabs are cheaper – if you wait for a discount, you could even get a couple for that price. VR4s are about the same price, but lighter at 2.8-3 kg. BR3s without ceramics are about 1.5 kg each, so the price is the same.
    The heaviest ones are made with aluminum oxide. Silicon carbide is lighter, but also more expensive. Plus, it has anti-fragment ballistics in all areas. Overall, if you're going to rack up at least 70-90,000 rubles yourself, it's going to be around 11-13 kilograms. And with ceramics and BR2 ballistics, that's 11-13 kilograms. That's without everything else—just the armor. I'm old, so it's still a bit heavy for me... I don't think I'd be able to ride around in it for long. There are, of course, load-bearing systems like the Stich Frame, which allow you to transfer some of the weight from your shoulders to your warbelt, but I haven't tried it yet—that costs a lot of money, the racks themselves are around 8,000, and a decent belt is 8-10,000. You can't stock up on enough, and half of it already looks crooked.

    In general, you need to choose based on the tasks and, most importantly, the budget. For some, a BR3 plate grinder is enough, while for others, a BR5 and beyond, with all the necessary ploughshares, belly pads, shoulder pads, etc., etc., is enough. But either way, it ends up being very expensive... Especially with silicon carbide. The rich say they make them out of boron, which is even lighter, but also prohibitively expensive. I've never seen any of those for sale.

    Our BR3s—people in shooting videos show that they seem to hold up to 5.45x39 and 7.62x39 with a steel, non-armor-piercing core. Even though they're not required to do so by class and the certificate doesn't mention it. They're positioned as BR3+. The barrier is certainly substantial, but with a good CAP, it's probably tolerable.

    In short, it's difficult and expensive. I'm afraid to even imagine how much they'll charge the troops for this.

    There are two aspects to the Chinese version. First, they don't have ceramics all over, but rather substantial indentations around the edges. That's why they weigh half a kilo less than ours, and the price is more reasonable. For example, I'm quite large, so the protection area with the Chinese version is absolutely ridiculous. And judging by the texts, Western standards allow for some truly outrageous protection, almost 4-plus centimeters, without penetration. That would leave you without your guts, even though there won't be a hole. No KAP will help.
    1. +4
      22 March 2026 12: 58
      Excellent addition to the article. drinks , i.e. your comment is more informative than the ultra-patriotic "articles".
  12. +6
    22 March 2026 10: 09
    Unfortunately, until all our officials' children go off to war, the equipment will be constantly refined, displayed at exhibitions, and people will talk a lot about how awesome these suits are, but it won't be deployed to the troops anytime soon. The guys are managing on their own, buying everything with their own money, or even stealing it from the enemy. On March 8th, some woman reported to Putin that communications in the troops were fine. She probably has everything fine, and the same will be true for the equipment. It's very sad to realize.
    1. -7
      22 March 2026 11: 44
      Nikolai Peskov, the son from the first marriage of Russian Presidential Press Secretary Dmitry Peskov, signed a six-month contract with the Wagner PMC in the summer of 2022.
      The nephew of State Duma Speaker Vyacheslav Volodin is currently on the front lines.
      Anton Sablin, the eldest son of State Duma deputy Dmitry Sablin, renounced his student exemption in December 2022 and volunteered for the SVO zone.
      Oleg Aksyonov, the eldest son of Crimean leader Sergei Aksyonov, also went to the SVO zone. He went to the front as part of the partial mobilization announced in September 2022.
      26-year-old contract marine Alexei Rozhkov, son of Stavropol Duma deputy Alexander Rozhkov, is undergoing treatment after a serious leg wound and has been nominated for the Medal for Courage.

      they serve well
      The refinement of the equipment speaks of development, and judging by the video from the SVO, many use the Strelok and Ratnik combat vehicles, and buy equipment from any army in the world.
      American soldiers deployed to Iraq are forced to purchase body armor out of pocket, the Associated Press reports. In many cases, families shell out several thousand dollars for the protective gear.
      1. +5
        22 March 2026 12: 26
        Let me repeat again, Peskov's son in Wagner is a very strange and murky story. Better tell us about the citizenship of his other relatives, maybe not everyone knows.
        1. -3
          22 March 2026 12: 29
          You wrote that children of officials do not serve, I refuted your statement with facts.
          I'm not interested in Peskov's relatives.
          1. +1
            22 March 2026 13: 29
            "You wrote that officials' children don't serve"—you're lying, though; a very crude attempt. Alexey wrote "to fight, not to serve."
            Tell us which of the elite's children died in the North-Eastern Military District. Bring in the State Duma, the Security Council, the Federation Council, the government, and the Presidential Administration. No need for "I was in Mozdok for two hours, so I must have participated in the Chechen war." Give us specifics.
            1. +1
              22 March 2026 14: 11
              Alexey Varnavsky, the son of Nikolay Varnavsky, a communist deputy of the Vologda Oblast Legislative Assembly, died of his wounds in April 2022.
              Georgy Dudorov, the son of the vice-governor of the Nenets Autonomous Okrug, Alexander Dudorov, was killed in March 2022.
              Denis Shestak, the son of former Crimean Sports Minister Georgy Shestak, died in April 2023.
              Denis Divnogortsev, the son of Oksana Divnogortseva, Deputy Minister of Agriculture of the Krasnoyarsk Territory, was killed in October 2023.

              And what makes you think they're serving and not fighting? 26-year-old contract marine Alexei Rozhkov, son of Stavropol Duma deputy Alexander Rozhkov, is undergoing treatment after a serious leg wound and has been nominated for the Medal "For Courage."

              More than 20 people left my village for the North-Eastern Front, one (former prisoner) from the Wagner PMC died, the rest aren't fighting, it turns out.
              1. +3
                22 March 2026 15: 09
                Is that all you could find? Well, the number of officials in Russia as of 2026, according to the official list, is 3.2 million, not counting security forces. And in general, that's nothing. So, unfortunately, your examples show that the children of officials practically don't participate in military actions. And the children of those who make decisions about military actions – even less so.
                And do they serve? Of course they do. Timur Ivanov and Tsalikov also serve (or served). Many elite children serve in the army, as well as in the Ministry of Internal Affairs, the FSB, and other organizations. But for some reason, their parents aren't eager to send them into military action. But others—it's easy. That's what Alexey wrote about.
                We like to compare the SVO and the Great Patriotic War, because the children of the Supreme Commander himself participated and died there.

                "More than 20 people left my village for the North-Eastern Military District, one died" - you yourself gave a sad example of how more people left your village than you could give examples of.

                "So the rest aren't fighting, or what?" - these are the people who are fighting. Because they're from the village.

                And one more thing for you:
                By the start of the war, the Communist Party had approximately 3,8–3,9 million members. Over 3 million communists died during the war.
                - At the United Russia congress, the number of party members and supporters was announced - 2,5 million members.
                I think you understand everything further yourself. hi
                1. -2
                  22 March 2026 16: 12
                  If we had mobilization, we could shout about injustice, but we have volunteers,
                  and I didn’t name all of them, but just a few as an example

                  26-year-old contract marine Alexei Rozhkov, son of Stavropol Duma deputy Alexander Rozhkov, is undergoing treatment after a serious leg wound and has been nominated for the Medal "For Courage." He was wounded and awarded, but you're sitting on the couch and saying he didn't fight.
                2. -1
                  23 March 2026 09: 03
                  Quote: Ivan F
                  By the start of the war, the Communist Party had approximately 3,8–3,9 million members. Over 3 million communists died during the war.

                  How much longer can we carry around this GlavPurovsky nonsense?
                  According to the statistics of the Main Political Directorate, "3.9 million communists died," and according to the statistics of the Central Committee of the Komsomol, 4 million Komsomol members died.
                  3.9+ 4= 7.9 million of the dead 8.6
                  That is, of the 700,000 remaining dead non-party members, there are ALL those shot, all those who died in penal battalions, those who died in captivity, deserters, those who died in the rear, those who died suddenly, all units of which nothing remained in the first days of the war.
                  Here's a trivial example:
                  "For the period from June 22 to December 31, 1941 The number of criminal cases initiated throughout the Red Army and heard by military tribunals increased sharply. During the six months of the war, the Red Army's military prosecutors' offices initiated 85.876 cases, and in the period September–December alone, the military prosecutor's office's investigative apparatus completed investigations of up to 50.000 cases.
                  "90.322 servicemen were convicted by military tribunals... Of the total number of those convicted by military tribunals, those sentenced to capital punishment were: execution 31.327 people and 58.995 to imprisonment."
                  Thus, in just 6 months NOTICE 31327 of the dead were not members of the party or the Komsomol.
                  And taking into account the chaos that was going on in the army as of 05/07/1940 (Act of acceptance of the People's Commissariat of Defense), including along party lines - when, for example, they sowed belay 260,000 party card forms – the figures from the Main Political Directorate and the Komsomol seem anecdotal and plucked out of thin air.
  13. +2
    22 March 2026 10: 53
    I still don't get it. Are active headphones included in the kit or not?
    1. 0
      22 March 2026 11: 44
      The Ratnik KBS team includes 6M2 headphones.
      1. 0
        22 March 2026 13: 08
        I have two questions about the new version, as I haven't used it yet. What's with the hissing sound like in the previous version? And is there an option to connect a radio?
        1. +2
          22 March 2026 13: 15
          6m2 is available in two versions: with and without the possibility of connection
          Judging by the video, the new modifications work well for their price.
    2. +1
      22 March 2026 12: 44
      Quote: Sergey Alexandrovich
      I still don't get it. Are active headphones included in the kit or not?

      There's no specifics whatsoever in the article. It's just corporate style.
  14. 0
    22 March 2026 20: 37
    "For objective reasons, the implementation of such plans had to be postponed for some time...."
    What a joy...theft and corruption have been given the status of objective causes? And the current "inmates" among the court generals were raking it in for reasons beyond their control? It just so happened... No.
  15. RMT
    0
    30 March 2026 16: 18
    "The existing Ratnik system is planned to be supplemented with new devices in the coming months or years."
    Months or years? That's a fair amount of time.