The nuclear submarine Kazan successfully hit its target with an Onyx cruise missile.

8 931 56
The nuclear submarine Kazan successfully hit its target with an Onyx cruise missile.


Exercises were held in the Barents Sea. During the exercise, the nuclear submarine Kazan successfully hit a target of an anti-ship cruise missile. rocket "Onyx".

This was reported by the press service of the Northern fleet The Russian Navy.

The message says:

The Northern Fleet's nuclear-powered missile submarine Kazan fired an Onyx cruise missile from a submerged position at a naval target, designated as an enemy ship, located at a distance of up to 300 kilometers.

According to objective control data, the missile warhead accurately hit the target.


During the exercises, part of the Barents Sea was closed. For this purpose, surface warships and naval forces were deployed to the firing area. aviation.

The submarine "Kazan" is the second in the Yasen-M series. The submarine was launched in 2017. In 2021, it joined the Northern Fleet.

Last year, similar firings took place in the Barents Sea involving the nuclear submarine Arkhangelsk. It fired an Onyx missile at a target located approximately 200 kilometers away.

Naval exercises were also held today in the Pacific Fleet. The small anti-submarine ship MPK-107 participated. According to the scenario, it successfully repelled an attack. drones a simulated enemy in Avacha Bay.

In the current challenging international environment, such combat training events are essential. They help maintain the combat readiness of our Navy.

56 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. + 14
    12 March 2026 15: 56
    Oh, if only we could work on the "grain deal" ships that are heading to Ukrainian ports like this!
    1. -18
      12 March 2026 15: 58
      So, the 404th power system is already working perfectly fine, isn't it enough? Do you need more?
      1. 0
        12 March 2026 16: 17
        Quote: Vicente
        So, the 404th power system is already working perfectly fine, isn't it enough? Do you need more?

        Well, appetite comes with eating... laughing
        1. -2
          12 March 2026 17: 41
          It's definitely a joker. It seems like they're just regulating the amount of money the EU injects into Ukraine with these kinds of strikes—after all, they need to rebuild, and Kyiv doesn't have any money...
      2. +2
        12 March 2026 17: 03
        What's wrong with their power grid? Is the entire Outskirts without power, heat, or internet? Or... No, that can't be...
        1. -1
          12 March 2026 17: 19
          Al Manakh...how much money are the EU and US curators now investing in the restoration of the Outskirts every month? Can you handle it?
          1. -2
            12 March 2026 17: 21
            They have printing presses, they will print as much as they want for their proxies who are doing us harm.
            1. 0
              12 March 2026 17: 29
              I'll make you happy, they print and buy our hydrocarbons, agricultural products, fertilizers, and other things for the Russian budget at astronomical prices now... Al Manakh, why didn't you know about this?
              1. -4
                12 March 2026 19: 06
                How should I know? Thanks, at least you enlightened the ignorant. So what was the result of the strikes on the former Ukrainian power grid? Did the front collapse? Did the Banderlokhs capitulate? Or at least freeze?
                1. 0
                  12 March 2026 19: 08
                  Well, now we'll check what the al-manakh knows...so how much do the owners of the Outskirts spend monthly on restoring the destroyed Soviet economy in this area...and how much do they contribute to the Russian Federation budget by buying our hydrocarbons, grain, and fertilizers? Can you handle it?
                  1. -2
                    12 March 2026 20: 45
                    You haven't answered my questions, and I guess you have nothing to say, so you're starting to steer the conversation in other directions. Write again. But to other people this time. But don't forget to leave a message under this post of mine so you have the last word, otherwise you'll have trouble sleeping.
                    1. -2
                      13 March 2026 06: 30
                      not capable and not capable, al manah here however is not a kindergarten, such is c'est la vie
                      1. 0
                        14 March 2026 02: 05
                        Complexes are such complexes...))
                      2. -1
                        14 March 2026 06: 20
                        not capable and not capable, al manakh here however is not a kindergarten, such is c'est la vie, this music will be eternal
      3. 0
        13 March 2026 13: 58
        It's strange. They've been working for five years, and there's still electricity. Why?
    2. -2
      12 March 2026 16: 06
      Everything there is paid for, the money fell into the right pockets, so the "grain carriers" are untouchable.
    3. +5
      12 March 2026 16: 08
      "In Odessa, the passenger-cargo ferry CENK T, which flies under the Panamanian flag and belongs to the Turkish company Cenk Ro-Ro, was damaged by a ballistic strike," Ukrainian sources reported.

      Odessa authorities reported a drone attack on two sea vessels near the port.
      Odessa OVA: UAVs attacked a tanker and a vessel flying the flags of Panama and San Marino.
    4. +2
      12 March 2026 16: 14
      hi As if there were more important matters, it is a shame for the State to still tolerate the antics of petty Britons and Bandera followers, as well as mattress thieves with intelligence and the supply of weapons to the Jewish drug dealer.
      Where should the exercises and demonstration strikes against the enemy, with their casualties, take place, without a single finger being pointed at Bryansk, Kursk, Donetsk, Crimea, and all other territories of the Russian Federation, as well as the deterrence triad according to the new military doctrine: the Baltic, the Mediterranean, the Black Sea, the Atlantic, and the Pacific Ocean?
      am
    5. +6
      12 March 2026 16: 51
      They're already working on ships bound for Greater Odessa, albeit very selectively. Although, they could have shut down the Odessa port completely by now.
    6. +3
      12 March 2026 17: 01
      Nowadays, shooting at targets is a crime. Aren't there enough targets in Sumeria?
      1. 0
        12 March 2026 18: 53
        Quote: mitrich
        Nowadays, shooting at targets is a crime. Aren't there enough targets in Sumeria?

        Stop live-fire, they'll give you ammo before the fight—you'll learn from there? Do you think this is the right principle? laughing
        1. 0
          13 March 2026 15: 18
          Is this your gem, just the one to post it? Did you understand the article's topic, or did you just misread it and disapprove (or approve, etc.)?
          1. 0
            13 March 2026 16: 01
            Quote: mitrich
            Is this your gem, just the one to post it? Did you understand the article's topic, or did you just misread it and disapprove (or approve, etc.)?

            Stop all training in the Russian Armed Forces—send all ammunition to the front? Where are you going to launch a Zircon Marine missile at Ukraine, given its 450 km range? It looks more like you stole the post! laughing
    7. +2
      12 March 2026 18: 16
      We can simply plant mines there with our submarines and warn them, what could be simpler?
    8. +5
      12 March 2026 18: 25
      Quote: Fachmann
      Oh, if only we could work on the "grain deal" ships that are heading to Ukrainian ports like this!

      We have lost something more substantial to the Northern Fleet - the SSBN "Prince Vladimir". NATO's northern flank is on edge. They'll be exhausted looking for it. hi (Norwegian Barents Observer).
      1. 0
        12 March 2026 18: 55
        Quote: tralflot1832
        We've lost something more substantial to the Northern Fleet - the SSBN "Prince Vladimir". NATO's northern flank is in tatters. They'll be exhausted looking for it.

        We have submarines - for the last 60 years they have been going to the battlefield - why are they "on the edge"? Is it an extraordinary event for them - the launch of a submarine to the battlefield?
    9. -3
      12 March 2026 18: 57
      Quote: Fachmann
      Oh, if only we could work on the "grain deal" ships that are heading to Ukrainian ports like this!

      If ships continue to sail to Ukrainian ports, this means nothing less than "high treason"...
  2. 0
    12 March 2026 16: 02
    0niks supersonic anti-ship missile, range around 450 km, weight 300 kg, installed on Bastions, I think, and now on submarines too
    1. +5
      12 March 2026 16: 10
      It is installed on ships with a UKSK, also on Project 885 submarines, and on Bastion coastal complexes.
      Warhead weight 300 kg; missile weight 2,5 t
      1. +1
        13 March 2026 01: 35
        Quote: Kull90
        The rocket weighs 2,5 tons.

        Starting weight 3800 kg.
    2. +4
      12 March 2026 16: 21
      It’s the other way around: “Onyx” first appeared on ships and boats, and then they made “Bastion”.
      Is work underway or completed to increase the flight range to 800 km?
      They are also installed on the latest series of Varshavyanka diesel boats.
      1. +1
        12 March 2026 16: 53
        You are mistaken: the Varshavyankas have Kalibr missiles, the Pr 885 submarines have Onyx missiles, and the modernized Pr 670 (decommissioned) and Pr 949 (they wanted to modernize or carried out modernization) submarines
        1. 0
          12 March 2026 18: 48
          What's there, the TA 533 and the TA 650? For different torpedoes and missiles.
          1. 0
            12 March 2026 18: 50
            If you're talking about Varshavyanka, it's 533 mm.
            If it's Project 885, it has 533mm and missile silos.
      2. 0
        12 March 2026 17: 38
        Sergey 39 Kazan is a nuclear submarine, not like the Varshavyanka
      3. -1
        12 March 2026 17: 48
        Quote: Sergey39
        It’s the other way around: “Onyx” first appeared on ships and boats, and then they made “Bastion”.

        Hmm... I think the Bastion was accepted into service in 2010. Back when there were no naval carriers with the UKSK yet.
        1. +3
          12 March 2026 18: 52
          The lead ship, the B-452 Berkut, was refitted to Project 06704 Chaika-B between 1986 and 1992. It was armed with P-800 Onyx missiles (three in each missile silo) and served with them until 1998.
          1. +1
            12 March 2026 19: 27
            Quote: Kull90
            The lead ship, the B-452 Berkut, was refitted to Project 06704 Chaika-B between 1986 and 1992. It was armed with P-800 Onyx missiles (three in each missile silo) and served with them until 1998.

            I sprinkle ashes on my head ... sad
            But in the comments to the article about the conversion of "loaves" to "kalibrs" and "onyxes" (with an increase in the number of missiles), he himself posted a photo of a mock-up of the SM-315 launcher from that same Project 06704 - how three "Onyxes" fit into the smaller old "Malakhit" launcher.
      4. 0
        12 March 2026 20: 24
        Quote: Sergey39
        Onyxes first appeared on ships and boats,

        That's right. Back then, the problem was with the target designation at maximum range. I wonder if Kazan was using its own data or the VII data again. If the sonar system detects a noisy target at 300 km, that's serious.
        and, secondly:
        According to objective control data, missile warhead hit the target right on target.
        If this isn't a new version of the Onyx, with a detachable warhead, like the combat stage on the 3M54, then the author has cobbled together a hunchback: in my time, the Onyx flew as a single "log" - without separating the transport and combat stages, like on the Kalibr.
        I wonder who is wrong: me or the author?
  3. +7
    12 March 2026 16: 05
    Instead of wasting missiles on targets, they could have helped the Iranians a little... There's a French submarine waiting for a missile, and so are the American ones... All they need to do is conduct live-fire exercises in the Mediterranean. Plus, they could practice stealthily entering a position and breaking contact... smile
    1. -4
      12 March 2026 16: 11
      Quote: Grandfather is an amateur
      could help the Iranians a little

      We can't help ourselves, or don't want to. Ships freely enter and leave Ukrainian ports. The SVO is increasingly turning from a special one into a surreal one.
      1. +1
        12 March 2026 16: 54
        American tankers are burning in the strait, and the American fleet is hiding, soiling its pants.
  4. +4
    12 March 2026 16: 15
    I don't understand why they waste rockets. It's easier to fire them at 404 and benefit the body.
    1. +1
      12 March 2026 16: 41
      100% sure there was no juicy target, the war is going on, and here they are firing in vain!
      1. +4
        12 March 2026 16: 55
        The Onyx anti-aircraft missile's range is not sufficient to destroy targets in Ukraine, but exercises need to be conducted.
        1. 0
          12 March 2026 17: 37
          A European gas carrier, huh? They won't find any traces anyway.
  5. -7
    12 March 2026 16: 23
    They showed the launch, but where is the result?
    According to objective control data, the missile warhead accurately hit the target.

    So far I've seen how the booster block worked.
    Apparently, religion does not allow showing the hit.
    As usual, people must take our word for it.
    At least, for the soul, they stuck on something old.
  6. ptt
    +2
    12 March 2026 16: 27
    The exercises are taking place in the wrong area and the shooting is being done at the wrong targets. It's war!
  7. 0
    12 March 2026 16: 36
    Exercises were conducted in the Barents Sea, during which the nuclear submarine Kazan successfully hit a target with an Onyx anti-ship cruise missile.

    The exercises must be conducted in the Red Sea. Khusyat customs will give the go-ahead.
  8. +2
    12 March 2026 16: 46
  9. 0
    12 March 2026 16: 47
  10. 0
    12 March 2026 17: 33
    It's frustrating that the goal educational
  11. +4
    12 March 2026 18: 33
    Quote: Ivan№One
    It's frustrating that the goal educational

    It would be better if it was a training one. And what about the SSBN "Prince Vladimir"? They've probably already reported to Trump. He reported to me (Norwegian Barenserunok ***), and I felt somehow calmer. And Trump started calling, asking about the "Spirit of Anchorage." laughing .
  12. -2
    12 March 2026 18: 55
    In light of current events, this is:
    The nuclear submarine Kazan successfully hit its target with an Onyx cruise missile.

    sounds like an order: "Practice on cats!"
  13. +3
    12 March 2026 19: 30
    Quote: 2 level advisor
    Quote: tralflot1832
    We've lost something more substantial to the Northern Fleet - the SSBN "Prince Vladimir". NATO's northern flank is in tatters. They'll be exhausted looking for it.

    We have submarines - for the last 60 years they have been going to the battlefield - why are they "on the edge"? Is it an extraordinary event for them - the launch of a submarine to the battlefield?

    One of the two definitely came out. Operation "Spirit of Anchorage". By the way, you won't learn anything from our people, what remains from the enemy?
    Quote: 2 level advisor
    Quote: tralflot1832
    We've lost something more substantial to the Northern Fleet - the SSBN "Prince Vladimir". NATO's northern flank is in tatters. They'll be exhausted looking for it.

    We have submarines - for the last 60 years they have been going to the battlefield - why are they "on the edge"? Is it an extraordinary event for them - the launch of a submarine to the battlefield?

    When the satellite showed the pier where the "Prince Vladimir" was moored empty, three aircraft were scrambled, one of them an anti-submarine aircraft and two radar reconnaissance aircraft. Isn't this a hoax? Routine.
  14. +1
    12 March 2026 19: 40
    Why isn't anyone discussing the actions of the crew of the aging MPK-107, which the Soviet Navy accepted on March 14, 1991, and was named "Irkutsky Komsomolets," or calling for them to sail to warmer seas? After all, the iconic vessel was the penultimate ship of Project 1124M, built at the Khabarovsk Shipyard named after the 60th Anniversary of the USSR. After all, in two days, the ship will celebrate a milestone: 35 years of service... And is no one willing to discuss the desire of the ineffective USC managers? The shipyard is more dead than alive. And, as is often the case in Russia, no one is to blame.