According to known data: the results of the use of the Khorramshahr-4 IRBM

29 954 30
According to known data: the results of the use of the Khorramshahr-4 IRBM
The Khyber complex undergoing testing


In the current Operation True Promise 4, the Iranian armed forces are using almost the entire range of ballistic missiles available to them. missilesIn particular, this marks the first combat use of the new Khorramshahr-4 or Khyber medium-range missiles. A significant amount of related material has now become publicly available. weapons, and now there is an opportunity to evaluate its potential.



Table characteristics


According to available data, development of the advanced Khorramshahr-4/Khyber IRBM began at the end of the last decade. An existing missile served as the basis for the new missile. The completed system of the new type was first demonstrated to the public in May 2023. Several years were then spent on testing and preparation for production. In late February 2026, the deployment of the new systems to the military was officially announced.

The Khyber is a mobile system comprising a semitrailer-mounted launcher, a medium-range missile, and a suite of support equipment. Upon receiving the order, the system's crew moves to the designated launch site, prepares the equipment, and launches the missile.

The system's IRBM is presumably built using a two-stage design. Both stages use liquid-propellant rocket engines developed in Iran. A key feature of the Khorramshahr-4 is its ampulized fuel tanks, allowing the missile to be stored and transported fully fueled.


A missile launcher in a shelter

According to various sources, the Khyber can deliver its warhead to a range of up to 2 km. However, there have been international speculations about the possibility of increasing this range by reducing the payload and/or optimizing the trajectory.

The IRBM has a guidance system typical of such munitions. Guidance is achieved during the boost phase of the trajectory using inertial and satellite navigation. Some sources mention the use of a warhead stage with its own guidance systems. This is intended to perform certain maneuvers and make interception more difficult.

Apparently, the Khorramshahr-4 can carry various payloads. Such payloads can weigh up to 1500-1800 kg. Initially, the possibility of installing a single-block high-explosive fragmentation warhead was mentioned. Later, information emerged about a cluster warhead with 80 limited-weight warheads.

Combat application


Long-range missile systems are in service with the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps. On the morning of March 2, this force reported another series of missile strikes against enemy and allied targets. This time, Khyber missiles were used in the attacks. These missiles were reported to be highly effective.


Rocket launch

Subsequently, the use of such IRBMs became regular. The IRGC publishes videos of Khorramshahr-4 missile launches at various targets in the region almost daily. They also report successfully penetrating enemy missile defenses and inflicting significant damage on enemy targets.

For obvious reasons, objective verification data confirming the actual results of Khyber missile deployments is not published. However, numerous photographs and videos of Iranian missiles landing and landing in the Middle East are publicly available. Judging by certain details, some of these materials specifically relate to the use of the Khorramshahr-4 IRBM.

The IRGC publishes curious but repetitive videos. They show the moment a missile launches and the first seconds of its flight. Much of the footage is retouched, preventing the enemy from even roughly determining the launch site. These videos are filmed both day and night.

Bystanders in Israel captured the deployment of a ballistic missile's warhead and the release of its submunitions. Several indicators indicate that these were indeed Khyber IRBMs. Furthermore, despite Israeli censorship, short videos of the impact and detonation of submunitions are being released to the public. However, these videos only show explosions on roads or in built-up areas. Footage of strikes on military or administrative targets is not published or is quickly deleted.


Visible potential


For obvious reasons, objective data on the combat use of the Khorramshahr-4 system is extremely limited. However, the available information and materials allow us to draw certain conclusions and assessments. The key features and advantages of the Iranian IRBM, as well as its capabilities in the current conflict, are already clear.

Like other Iranian systems, the Khyber is mobile. However, it uses protected underground shelters for combat alert. These measures allowed the IRGC to preserve a significant portion of its missile weapons, despite active reconnaissance and strike systems from the enemy. Now, the IRGC-held IRBMs that were saved from destruction are being used in retaliatory strikes.

The Khorramshahr-4 missile has improved operational characteristics. This is primarily reflected in a reduced launch preparation time. However, it should be noted that the launcher for this IRBM has an archaic design with a launch pad. This complicates launch preparation and partially negates other advantages. However, overall performance remains acceptable, and the enemy is unable to detect and disable the launchers in time.

Khyber IRBMs are used against targets within Israel. The minimum distance between Iran and Israel exceeds 1050-1100 km. However, the missile has a stated range of up to 2 km. Experience shows that the characteristics of this munition are sufficient to attack any Israeli targets, including those located very far from Iran.


Presumably, the flight of submunitions of a cluster warhead

Of particular interest is the introduction of a cluster warhead, complementing the traditional single-warhead. This armament allows the missile to engage not only point targets but also area targets. Furthermore, dropping submunitions at an altitude of several kilometers significantly increases the dispersion area. The cluster allows for the attack and destruction of large targets, such as airfields or entire military bases.

However, judging by published materials, the cluster munitions' warheads have a limited mass. They carry no more than a few kilograms of explosive, which affects their power and limits the range of targets they can effectively engage. Furthermore, it cannot be ruled out that the cluster munitions were used to compensate for the low targeting accuracy.

It should be noted that the Khyber can carry various types of warheads. Consequently, the IRGC has the ability to select the payload that best suits the characteristics of specific targets and installations. This increases the flexibility of the missile system's use.

The fall of warheads in enemy territory indicates the IRBM's ability to penetrate missile defenses. However, the Khorramshahr-4's similar potential is not fully understood. Iran conducts combined attacks using large numbers of missiles and strike UAVs. A massive air strike forces the enemy to expend its anti-aircraft weapons, thereby clearing the way for subsequent attacks. By carefully orchestrating its strikes, the IRGC ensures the successful use of medium-range missiles.


A submunition exploded in Israel. The destination of the remaining submunitions is unknown.

Despite all this, the Khyber's own potential to penetrate missile defense systems remains questionable. At the same time, the developers have taken steps to improve these capabilities. For example, they could use a cluster munition warhead for this purpose. Such warheads must be intercepted before the submunitions are released, which increases the requirements for missile defense systems.

Modern product


Over the past several decades, Iran has faced well-known difficulties, risks, and limitations of a technical, economic, and political nature. Despite these challenges, it has managed to develop a fairly broad range of missile weapons, including medium-range surface-to-surface missile systems. The most recent known development of this type is the Khyber/Khorramshahr-4.

As part of the ongoing Operation True Promise-4, the IRGC is using a variety of missiles, including the Khyber. This modern IRBM is being used against targets of its main regional adversary, Israel. Iran reports successful strikes and the destruction of its intended targets, while Israel is concealing the consequences of the missile crashes.

Nevertheless, censorship and propaganda do not prevent us from understanding and appreciating the overall potential of the Khorramshahr-4. Experience has shown that it is a modern ballistic missile with sufficiently high performance characteristics to accomplish its intended missions. However, the outcome of any conflict depends on more than just the weapon's performance. Whether the Khyber missiles will be able to influence the overall situation and help end the exchange of strikes remains to be seen.
30 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +5
    12 March 2026 03: 53
    Will this missile reach the Romanian base where the Americans retreated from the BV?
    1. +3
      12 March 2026 14: 23
      Quote: andrewkor
      Will this missile reach the Romanian base where the Americans retreated from the BV?

      Yes .
    2. +2
      13 March 2026 23: 31
      According to the map from Tabriz (a city 200 km from Turkey), the range is enough to cover half of Romania, meaning two NATO bases - Deveselu and Kogalniceanu - are quite accessible.
  2. -5
    12 March 2026 04: 25
    Quote: andrewkor
    Will this missile reach the Romanian base where the Americans retreated from the BV?

    Only with a stopover for refueling in Vityazevo.
  3. +4
    12 March 2026 04: 37
    It would be nice to hit Rzeszow, Poland, with a couple of these missiles.
    1. +4
      12 March 2026 05: 47
      Rzeszow needs to be cleared with hazelnuts
      1. + 10
        12 March 2026 05: 52
        Quote from: FoBoss_VM
        Rzeszow needs to be cleared with hazelnuts

        Expensive...without a special part there is no point.
        I wonder if there will be any reaction from the Kremlin even if British missiles destroy all of Bryansk?
        1. + 16
          12 March 2026 06: 05
          Have there been any reactions other than red-tip markers in the last four years? There won't be any this time either. Not with the VGK.
          1. +3
            12 March 2026 10: 42
            Have there been any reactions other than red marker ones over the last 4 years?
            Medvedev frowned! wink
        2. +2
          12 March 2026 13: 54
          We will crush them with concern!
        3. +1
          13 March 2026 00: 00
          No. There won't be a reaction even if the entire Kremlin is destroyed. The war for global domination is essentially between the US and Great Britain. Only there will they determine who, when, and how can be "destroyed."

          This is a war-revolution of the world's digital elite against the financial elite. Neither exists in Rus'.
    2. +2
      13 March 2026 22: 47
      So far, only the brave Iranians are pounding Incirlik in Turkey, where about 50 of the well-known B-61s are stored. And the Americans are afraid to even think about using them in response. But the French are no longer afraid to use their TN75s against Russian cities, even with the help of the Ukrainians. They know there will never be any response from the Coward. Except this.
  4. -5
    12 March 2026 05: 10
    A submunition exploded in Israel. The destination of the remaining submunitions is unknown.

    They're like demons, self-destructing. It's all just a puff of smoke after a menacing puff of cheeks.
    All this is due to illiterate application.
    1. +3
      12 March 2026 07: 20
      Well, why was it ignorant? Very much so. Firstly, there was no unnecessary bloodshed, and secondly, there was probably a hefty BOOM, which reminded the enemy that misbehaving is not nice. And it could get even worse. So I think it was very humane, but intentional. And something still got lost somewhere, not completely lost.
      1. +4
        12 March 2026 08: 42
        Quote: cat Crush
        There was probably a hefty BOOM that reminded the enemy that it's not good to behave badly.

        Wars aren't fought for the sake of booms and booms. Iran needs to reduce its air force activity, which destroys Iran not with booms and booms, but with real bombs.
  5. +4
    12 March 2026 08: 00
    The most important thing isn't a weapon's performance characteristics, but the command's determination to use them. Without this, any weapon is a useless pile of iron, even one with a nuclear warhead.
  6. +1
    12 March 2026 09: 25
    Quote: acetophenon
    Quote: andrewkor
    Will this missile reach the Romanian base where the Americans retreated from the BV?

    Only with a stopover for refueling in Vityazevo.


    Deripaska won't allow it - this is his airfield.
  7. -1
    12 March 2026 09: 43
    But the Khyber has potential for improvement! 1. In the single-warhead version, it's possible to equip the carrier with a kind of UAV with a relatively short range and a powerful warhead with optical guidance, and via Starlink (the US supplies Starlinks to the Iranian opposition... Starlinks operate on warheads: Saudi Arabia, UAE, Kuwait, Bahrain... Israel). 2. In the cluster warhead version, it's possible to use drones with optical guidance and AI control as submunitions...
  8. 0
    12 March 2026 10: 28
    Quote: andrewkor
    Will this missile reach the Romanian base where the Americans retreated from the BV?

    I saw a week ago that they reach their targets easily, even to our beloved Poland. Most Iranian missiles have a stated range of 2500 km, but the actual range is unknown to anyone and is a big surprise.
    But the entire ballistic flight path passes over Turkey or Armenia, there are no other options, and they can bark.
    1. 0
      12 March 2026 21: 54
      The medium-range ballistic missile primarily flies in space and therefore does not violate state borders. The warhead is similar to the 8K14 (Scud) missile, which is obviously where it comes from. The technology is already obsolete.
    2. 0
      12 March 2026 23: 49
      For reference: Poland (and, in fact, the US Navy), thanks to the unprecedented facility in Redzikowo, possesses a highly powerful Aegis Ashore anti-missile system. This system, to put it mildly, is head and shoulders above the much-hyped Patriot. It has a completely different range, different missile characteristics, and, crucially, a different intercept altitude—we're talking about SM-3 missiles. This is just food for thought, but one can hypothesize quite far-reaching things on this matter."
      1. -1
        13 March 2026 02: 28
        Quote: Rafaello
        For reference: Poland (and, in fact, the US Navy), thanks to the unprecedented facility in Redzikowo, possesses a highly powerful Aegis Ashore anti-missile system. This system, to put it mildly, is head and shoulders above the much-hyped Patriot. It has a completely different range, different missile characteristics, and, crucially, a different intercept altitude—we're talking about SM-3 missiles. This is just food for thought, but one can hypothesize quite far-reaching things on this matter."

        Your certificate is complete crap.

        Reality.
        For reference.
        Escher in Redzikowo - 24 SM-3 missiles.
        There are also 24 SM-4 launchers in Romania. The radar is located in Turkey.
        But.
        At any given time, there are approximately 4-5 Berk-class guided missile destroyers in the eastern Mediterranean/Black Sea or North Sea.
        Each of them carries approximately 12 SM-3 missiles and about 24 SM-6 missiles. The SM-3 operates at high altitudes and long ranges, even into space. The SM-6 operates at altitudes up to 40 km and at ranges up to 100 km.
        So it is the US destroyers that form the basis of Europe's missile defense system.
        1. 0
          13 March 2026 22: 13
          Where exactly did you detect "nonsense"? The information I presented is publicly available, and it doesn't contradict your arguments in any way. One complements the other.
      2. 0
        14 March 2026 20: 29
        Practice is the criterion of truth! We must test it!
  9. 0
    12 March 2026 11: 09
    Oh, if only such a fool could attack an aircraft carrier...
    1. +1
      12 March 2026 11: 53
      A single missile would almost certainly be shot down. A swarm of UAVs and several missiles would be needed to attack an aircraft carrier. Although, perhaps the scenario described in the article could have worked:
      The Khyber's own potential to penetrate missile defense systems remains questionable. At the same time, the developers have taken steps to improve these capabilities. For example, they could use a cluster munition warhead for this purpose. Such warheads must be intercepted before the submunitions are released, which increases the requirements for missile defense systems.
      Of course, you can't sink it with a cluster warhead (and most likely with a single warhead, too), but you can cause significant damage. Even if the runway is damaged, you can't cover it with rubble or pave it. And anyway, repairing damage at sea is extremely difficult, so it absolutely needs to be towed from the theater of operations to a repair facility.
  10. +2
    12 March 2026 11: 49
    Most likely, the video where a single munition with no more than 10 kg of warhead was fired is a 250-300 kilogram rocket from a 220-240 mm MLRS.
    With such a small warhead, it is capable of reaching Israel as bait for Patriots and the like.
  11. +2
    13 March 2026 08: 24
    There is a video of the use of a cluster munition, there is a lot of destruction in Tel Aviv, censorship forces us to delete the video.
  12. 0
    14 March 2026 02: 11
    Quote: Puncher
    A submunition exploded in Israel. The destination of the remaining submunitions is unknown.

    They're like demons, self-destructing. It's all just a puff of smoke after a menacing puff of cheeks.
    All this is due to illiterate application.
  13. 0
    17 March 2026 21: 50
    Well, if a missile can bring sadness and grief to Jews, then it has excellent potential.