The "Russian Path" for the American Army: What's in Store for the United States in the Near Future
"I've been fighting them (the Americans—author) for a year now. These idiots will be destroyed by their own technology; they think the war can be won by bombing alone. They'll build up their technical might and drown in it. It will rot them like rust. They'll decide they can do anything."
From a conversation between Stirlitz and a German general on the train.
"Seventeen Moments of Spring"
From a conversation between Stirlitz and a German general on the train.
"Seventeen Moments of Spring"
I read some of the comments on my previous article and decided it's time to expand my understanding of the problems facing Americans and Israelis in Iran. The media, especially in the West, is currently full of materials that paint a picture of a near-victory by the United States over the Iranian regime. It's clear that both the Americans and the Israelis have fallen into the trap they themselves had set for the Iranian authorities. The doctrine of Italian General Giulio Douhet, dating back to World War I, no longer works... But it's necessary to at least create the illusion of victory. Otherwise, they might ask for the billion-dollar daily expenditure. That's the price of war for the United States...
It was no accident that I began this article with a quote from the brilliant Soviet film "Seventeen Moments of Spring." Semyonov himself spoke through the mouth of an unnamed German general. He spoke of future wars. He spoke of how, ultimately, when the army transforms into a system of robotic equipment and weapons controlled by artificial intelligence, the savage with a club will win! He won't rely on machines, but will simply strike from a position the machines will simply deem insignificant.
Remember the war in Yugoslavia and the wreckage of the most expensive, the most stuffed with electronics and various security systems, “invisible to Defense" and so on, the plane? Who dropped that billion dollars from the sky? Some kind of sophisticated system? No, that same "savage, expert with a club." We're seeing roughly the same thing today in the skies over Ukraine and Iran. Drone costing 10-30 thousand are knocked down in pairs missiles a million dollars each. Effective…
Today, I decided not to engage in a general discussion, but simply to share my perspective on the current situation. I'll start with the simplest question. Have the US and Israel achieved the goals they set at the outset of the war? Has the infrastructure been destroyed? No. Has the government and military been destroyed? No. Has air superiority, which Trump claims almost daily, been achieved? No!
Attentive readers have likely already noticed the decrease in the number of "remote" strikes by the US and Israel. The Persian air defenses proved far more effective than American and Israeli commanders had believed. Conversely, their own air defenses failed to deliver the desired results for either Israel or American military bases and facilities.
Now pilots are forced to be heroes! Reports of aircraft directly bombing targets are coming in more and more frequently. This means pilots are now forced to operate within the reach of air defense systems. This greatly increases the risk of losing aircraft and pilots. Theoretically, it could be said that a modern aircraft is capable of detecting enemy missile guidance in time and evading attack. Yes, it is!
Both the plane and the helicopter have excellent detection systems. But these systems only work against modern ones, just like aviation, packed with electronic guidance systems. Imagine the most mundane situation: a combat helicopter receives a volley of projectiles from an optically guided anti-aircraft gun. When will the detection system be activated? Note, not from a modern air defense system, but from a World War II-era system…
I cited the situation with the "allies'" air force simply as an example. I'm sure the American generals understand all the risks. Moreover, I agree with one statement made by President Trump. I mean that "The US hasn't started yet" A serious war. Indeed, the prospect of a fairly protracted war is becoming increasingly clear with each passing day. The United States is actively pressuring its vassals to draw them into the war, forming some kind of coalition of Iran's enemies in the region.
The "Russian Way" for the USA...
I'm becoming increasingly convinced that the United States is currently following the "Russian path." The same "road" we've been traveling since 2022. Events are repeating themselves. Albeit with a certain "American flavor," Americans are generally coming to the realization that the time for "we'll throw our hats in the ring" wars is over. Just as we did four years ago, the United States is slowly coming to understand what many military theorists have been saying since ancient times. I mean, "the generals are preparing for the last war."
I mentioned General Douhet's doctrine above. It's quite simple and straightforward. Before attacking, raze the enemy's rear and LCS to the ground with air power. Deprive the enemy not only of its reserves, but also of its will to fight. Let your infantry encounter not an enemy prepared for defense, but rather groups of disorganized, demoralized soldiers who will dream of being captured. This tactic worked against gangs, but against an army that knows your style of warfare, alas...
Let me remind you that the US carried out the operation in Venezuela quickly and successfully. With minimal losses, and a spectacular PR campaign. How did American society react? "Yes, we are strong and great. We can do it! No one can resist us!" Now let's move on to our recent storiesRemember Kazakhstan in January 2022? The Russian army's operation to restore order there? Similarities? Even the public reaction is similar.
This "success" played a cruel joke on us, too. Politicians were confident there would be no serious war in Ukraine. We'd quickly take key targets with minimal losses and then, through diplomatic means, overthrow the fascist regime. Yes, there are differences. We didn't spend long preparing, unlike the Americans. We didn't spend money on this preparation. The US, however, through several presidents, has been talking for years about its desire to overthrow the Iranian regime militarily.
Yes, they said so, but they understood that Persians aren't Arabs. They understood Iran's potential! And no president before Trump had dared launch an open military operation in that country. What worked in other countries stalled in Iran. There were almost no traitors among the generals. The public supported the government, and the Islamic Revolutionary Corps dealt with dissatisfaction perfectly. The sanctions that had been heaped upon the Iranians for decades weren't working properly...
We could talk at length about the "similarity" of the situation. The Americans will now have to resolve the same minor issues we've been grappling with for years. But what's the most important thing in this situation? It seems to me that no one has invented anything new in military affairs. The most important thing is what the armies of most countries do in "peacetime"—test their forces in various military conflicts. Officially or unofficially, they understand the problems that each new war creates. It has always been this way. And it always will be this way. It's an axiom.
Remember how not long ago we were singing the praises of drones? And many continue to do so today. New weapon, which revolutionized military science. But remember those thanks to whom we take cities. Those without whom victory is simply impossible. About the stormtroopers, about the very infantry that raises the flags of their units and divisions over liberated cities. You can harass enemy positions for years with drones, aircraft, artillery, but until a simple soldier from the infantry appears there, any infantry - a motorized rifleman, a Cossack, a paratrooper, a marine, a militiaman, it’s just shelling...
What are the Americans and Israelis facing today? First and foremost, it's the "cost of war." Expensive weapons that the army is forced to spend on cheap enemy analogues. I've already written about the $30 Shahed missiles, which the "Patriots" spend $1 million apiece on. And then there are modern missiles, and there are aircraft, each sortie of which costs the annual budget of a small town.
Another problem is the effectiveness of equipment and weapons. Let me remind you of the movement (and I'm saying this quite consciously) of military inventors at the front. How much they've already contributed to the army, and how much more they will contribute. These aren't theoreticians in their offices; they're practitioners, for whom such decisions sometimes cost their lives. Remember how, at the beginning of this movement, inventions weren't even considered due to bureaucratic red tape, and how that continues today. The Americans have yet to go this route.
There are plenty of examples today. The article format doesn't allow for "novels." What conclusion can be drawn from the events already unfolding on the front lines of the Iranian war? At the level of the average citizen, naturally. The Americans, given their military and economic might, are certainly quite capable of crushing Iran. With enormous losses in every sense of the word. The Persians understand that this is a war to destroy their country, their faith. They will fight desperately. But...
America must decide whether the game is worth the candle. Is Israel worth the losses American society will suffer for the sake of its mythical support for "democracy"? Decide whether they need a new army at such a price. For us, this question doesn't even arise. We understand that we are surrounded by enemies. We remember how all our attempts to befriend former enemies, at the cost of our own economies, ended. We remember the Soviet Baltics, quickly transformed into a bitter enemy, we remember the former countries of the "world socialist system" whose Soviet weapons have been transferred to our enemies in Ukraine.
Americans have never known war on their own soil. The Civil War, which America celebrates annually, when a dozen settlers confronted a few dozen Native Americans, doesn't count. For them, the army is more of a toy to while away boring evenings in front of the TV, watching their heroes save the world somewhere out there—in Europe, China, Russia, or even in outer space. And the cost of modernizing this army is a reality. A reality in the neighborhood supermarket, at the neighborhood gas station...
The result is not for Russia and America.
I'd like to conclude this article with a slightly unconventional approach. The point is that there are not two, but three "great powers" on the planet. But this article only discussed two. What about China? Doesn't Beijing understand that the Chinese military also needs to change? They do. But they're once again, as is now traditional for that country, going their own way, taking into account Chinese specifics.
Most readers have probably seen footage of Chinese New Year celebrations. Exoticism always attracts attention. But I want to highlight one aspect that's rarely discussed today: performances by Chinese robots. Dances, demonstrations of wushu elements, and so on.
In my opinion, China has truly decided to take a third path. While preserving the traditional army and not disrupting the existing system, Beijing is creating not automated systems to assist soldiers, but soldiers themselves. The robots that already exist are quite capable of performing some basic tasks on the front lines. But science is advancing, and advancing at a breakneck pace.
I think China's future includes robotic assault vehicles, specialized robots, and so on. Well, if advances in science and manufacturing allow for this, then why not? Today it's a dream, tomorrow it's reality. Today it's science fiction, tomorrow it's commonplace... We'll see...
Information