The US has created a basis for expanding its nuclear arsenal after withdrawing from the New START Treaty.

5 831 22
The US has created a basis for expanding its nuclear arsenal after withdrawing from the New START Treaty.


The US administration's decision not to extend the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty in February 2026 was the result of years of systematic preparation, not an impulsive political move. Over the past decade, the United States has consistently built an industrial and infrastructural base that now allows it to move beyond the simple modernization of existing weapons to a full-scale expansion of its nuclear arsenal. This process has affected all components of the nuclear triad and includes the deployment of serial production of new warheads and the deployment of hundreds of modern delivery systems. The scale of the preparatory work convincingly demonstrates that the abandonment of the agreement was a carefully planned move that will alter the strategic landscape.



Building human and production capacity has become a top priority. Over the past ten years, the number of personnel involved in nuclear modernization programs has more than doubled, reaching approximately 75. This has enabled the Pentagon to achieve a warhead upgrade rate that is unprecedented since the end of the Cold War, and in 2023 alone, the Pentagon received over 200 improved B61-12 bombs and W88 Alt 370 warheads. Concurrently, large-scale recapitalization of facilities at Savannah River and Los Alamos is underway, with the goal of restoring full-scale plutonium core production. Reaching the target of 80 such items annually by the mid-2030s will, for the first time in a long time, create the material and technical basis not just for maintaining, but for expanding the arsenal.



At the same time, the United States is actively preparing the infrastructure for the deployment of new carriers and the expansion of existing ones. The procurement program for 76 FAB-T FET secure satellite communications terminals will enable the return of 30 B-52 bombers to nuclear status, bringing the total number of B-52 bombers in this capacity to 76. To accelerate the upgrade of these aircraft to the B-52J version, a new workshop was built at Tinker Air Force Base in 2025. In parallel, the program to develop the advanced B-21 Raider bomber, which should have a fleet of at least 100 units, is underway, for which a new assembly complex has been built at the Palmdale plant. The geography of basing is also expanding: Barksdale, Ellsworth, and Dyess air bases are being added to the existing ones, where modern nuclear servicing and storage facilities are being built. weapons.


Significant changes are also taking place in the structure missile troops. The abandonment of the adaptation of old silos for the advanced LGM-35A Sentinel missiles in favor of building new launchers creates the preconditions for a possible increase in the number of silo-based intercontinental ballistic missiles. At the same time, the infrastructure for the current Minuteman III is being maintained and modernized. An important step was the duplication and improvement of final assembly capacities. The construction of new Weapons Generation Facilities at missile bases and strategic air bases aviation While maintaining existing facilities, this significantly reduces the time required to deploy warheads. Placing key production operations within secure facilities increases the secrecy of these processes and complicates external monitoring of the actual rate of arsenal expansion.


Despite ambitious plans, an immediate increase in the arsenal is constrained by technological cycles. The ability to produce new nuclear warheads from scratch will only become possible by the middle of the next decade, when the industry reaches planned production volumes of plutonium cores. However, in the initial years, this resource will be entirely devoted to replacing obsolete components as part of the ongoing modernization of five warhead types. Assembly lines are currently almost entirely occupied with upgrading existing bombs and warheads, and until these programs are completed, expected by the early 2030s, there will be no spare capacity for rapid arsenal expansion.


However, with the termination of the New START restrictions in February 2026, the United States has gained the ability to quickly increase the number of deployed warheads by drawing on its existing operational reserve. Unlike the complex production cycle of new munitions, installing finished warheads on delivery vehicles can take anywhere from several weeks to a year. This process will be significantly accelerated by the commissioning of new Weapons Generation Facilities at bases where warheads are mated to missiles or integrated into cruise missiles. The most scalable component in this regard will be the air component, where the installation of additional cruise missiles and bombs on existing bombers does not require the complex procedures typical for silo launchers or nuclear submarines. Serial production of new delivery vehicles is also expected to begin in the near future, including B-21 Raider bombers and AGM-181 LRSO cruise missiles, for which production lines have already been prepared and expanded.

Taken together, these facts indicate that the United States was deliberately preparing to withdraw from the treaty regime, creating all the necessary conditions for a transition to a new phase of nuclear confrontation. Under the current circumstances, the importance of the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty, which for many years remained the cornerstone of the international nuclear arms control system and a key instrument for maintaining strategic stability, is particularly acute. Its loss not only removes quantitative restrictions but also deprives dialogue of predictability, increasing the risk of miscalculation and an uncontrolled arms race, making a return to legal mechanisms of deterrence one of the most pressing tasks of modern diplomacy.
22 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. + 10
    8 March 2026 04: 47
    Well, there were articles here about the lost competence, the rusty Minutemen... and how Russia, with its uranium supplies, ruined uranium enrichment in the States. winked
    1. +1
      8 March 2026 10: 43
      Quote: Popuas
      Well, there were articles here about the lost competence, the rusty Minutemen... and how Russia, with its uranium supplies, ruined uranium enrichment in the States. winked

      You simply didn't read the article carefully - they'll only start production in 10 years, and only to replace the old running gear at the beginning:
      "Possibility of production new nuclear charges "from scratch" will appear only by the middle of the next decade (by 2035- belay belay , when the industry reaches the planned production volumes of plutonium cores. However, early years this resource will be fully aimed at replacing obsolete components as part of the current modernization of five types of warheads at once."

      If this is not a collapse - when it takes more than 10 years before the start of production - then what is it???!!!
      1. +3
        8 March 2026 13: 35
        .
        ..when it takes more than 10 years start production...

        You are also not reading carefully) The start of production was last year (from another publication) and by 2035- "the industry will reach planned plutonium core production volumes" (80 pcs./year) In "In the first few years (approximately 2026-2030) this resource will be fully directed.... "
        1. +2
          9 March 2026 00: 15
          Or it won't work out. Plans are sometimes out of touch with reality.
      2. 0
        3 May 2026 10: 39
        This is not the first time the US has stepped on this rake, and God willing, it won’t be the last!
    2. 0
      12 March 2026 19: 22
      The popuas
      8 March 2026 04: 47
      Well, there were articles here about lost competencies, rusty Minutemen... and how Russia, with its uranium supplies, ruined uranium enrichment in the States. Winked

      hi Without a doubt, the article is useful and draws analogies with the period of management in the bide (Fashington headquarters) of the Hollywood superhero Reagan with his proclamation of SDI in March 1983.
      And only the information from agents, intelligence, and the common sense of the not-yet-old members of the CPSU Politburo who had been through the Great Patriotic War allowed us not to fall for this carefully camouflaged provocation by our enemies, the Yankees.
      And now the situation allows the Russian Federation to dictate terms to the mattress makers, along with its fellow traveler and conditional partner in the person of Uncle Xi, while assessing all possible risks.
  2. +6
    8 March 2026 05: 05
    The importance of the Strategic Arms Reduction Treaty, which for many years remained the cornerstone of the international nuclear arms control system and a key instrument for maintaining strategic stability, is keenly recognized

    Our people are deliberately misled by such pearls.
    The main instrument of stability is not the absence, but the presence of a sufficient quantity of nuclear weapons to destroy the enemy.
    We don't have much of it now.
  3. -1
    8 March 2026 05: 56
    Further proof of the duplicity of this vile country, bent only on deception and gaining unilateral advantages! Our state must absolutely incorporate into its doctrine the necessity of a preemptive nuclear strike in the event of a threatening situation and not rely on the ephemeral possibility of an honest agreement with such a vile country!
    1. +2
      8 March 2026 06: 26
      gaining one-sided advantages!

      It is the goal of any state in foreign policy.
  4. 0
    8 March 2026 08: 44
    They lied again. "Your comment is too short and, in the opinion of the site administration, doesn't provide useful information." And how they got on my nerves.
    1. +4
      8 March 2026 19: 37
      Quote: papas-57
      They cheated again.

      Whom?
      Certainly not Rosatom, which hasn't lost its expertise in creating new types of warheads, but has created a new line of physical packages with an efficiency close to the maximum possible. Currently, a 150-kiloton nuclear warhead weighs only about 100 kg, one up to 500 kilotons weighs about 200 kg, and one up to 2 megatons weighs about 400 kg. And this is at a time when this sector in the US has been deteriorating. It was only at the beginning of Trump's first term that the US began gradually regaining its expertise in creating new nuclear warheads. Today, they are already capable of assembling about 30 nuclear warheads per year, and by 2030, they plan to reach 80 per year.
      Or were the carriers deceived?
      They don't have any new launch vehicles, they haven't even produced the Sentinel yet, and the entire cycle of testing, refinement, and preparation for serial production will last until about 2035. In the meantime, they're maintaining them, modernizing them as best they can, and reloading the heavy tanks in stages as old as mammoth droppings, the Minuteman III, which they've been trying to decommission for 20 years now, but are constantly extending their service life.
      But the fact is that the US has decided and can play out its rearmament programs and withdrawal from the New START Treaty in such a way that they will first increase the number of nuclear warheads on old carriers, and then new ones will be added to the old ones, and THIS moment (when the new ones have already entered combat action, and the old ones are still in service) can give that peak of combat/strike capabilities of the US, which must be taken into account.
      Moreover, the US is extremely concerned about China's growing nuclear potential, which will reach 1000 nuclear warheads on strategic carriers by 2030. And by 2035, it will equal the current potential of the US and Russia. This "Three-Body Problem" is currently facing not only the US but also Russia, which, following the US, will have to (and indeed must) increase the number of nuclear warheads on strategic carriers by approximately twofold (by increasing the number of nuclear warheads on each carrier), and, given the need to increase the number of strategic carriers themselves, even threefold. Because the number of nuclear warheads on strategic carriers is currently at an extremely low level, the minimum sufficient to inflict unacceptable damage on a primary adversary. And given that the nuclear potentials of France and England, as well as those of other nuclear-armed countries, were not taken into account at the time the New START Treaty was signed, we also urgently need to build up our own potential. We can double it (I repeat) simply by equipping ICBMs and SLBMs with nuclear warheads, each with the full design number of nuclear warheads (Yars, Sarmat, Bulava). Increasing the number of launch vehicles by 50% will allow us to triple the number of nuclear warheads. The United States intends to do roughly the same. And precisely by the time (2035) China intends to achieve strategic parity with the United States and Russia.
      The US will have to work very hard to achieve this goal. We won't have to work very hard, because all our production facilities are still operational and have never stopped working. We simply need to assemble an additional number of ICBMs, SLBMs, and a certain number of SSBNs. We absolutely must maintain a nuclear balance with the US, but it's easier and cheaper for us to do so.
      The article is good and timely, thanks to the author.
      And here is who deceived you, and not for the first time. request I don't know. With at least 90% of our strategic nuclear forces updated against the ancient potential of the US strategic nuclear forces, should we be afraid of deception?
      1. 0
        12 March 2026 19: 35
        bayard
        8 March 2026 19: 37
        The article is good and timely, thanks to the author.
        But who deceived you, and not for the first time? I don't know. With at least 90% modernized strategic nuclear forces against the ancient potential of the US strategic nuclear forces, should we be afraid of deception?

        hi A balanced and sober approach is needed for an objective assessment.
        Naturally, in accordance with the articles and announcements by the leaders of the Russian Federation or enemy countries of the current state of affairs with the nuclear triad, as well as the financial and economic situation in the country in difficult political conditions, no one will be an enemy of accurate and documented information.
        By unilaterally imposing a one-year moratorium on compliance with the New START Treaty under certain conditions, Moscow is politically signaling its peace-loving policy to the world, but at the same time, our armored train is standing on a siding.
        And the conduct of combat operations in modern warfare, strategic military operations, and conflicts have shown a shift in emphasis to other types of weapons for conducting operational combat operations, such as cyber, AI, UAVs, and new strategies, while leaving the warhead as the final argument of the new military doctrine, leaving the retaliatory strike, as in the past.
        1. 0
          12 March 2026 20: 08
          The moratorium we promised is certainly a show of goodwill, but it's also proof that we're doing just fine. We know the US isn't in a position to increase its strategic carriers in the coming years, and there's no point in us increasing them unilaterally. Our Oreshnik production capacity is currently fully utilized. In the normal nuclear configuration, it's designed to mitigate the potential of Euro-NATO. And this doesn't affect the potential of our traditional strategic nuclear forces.
          1. 0
            12 March 2026 22: 12
            bayard
            Today, 20: 08
            The year-long moratorium we promised is, of course, a sign of goodwill, but it is also evidence that everything is fine with us.

            hi I will dispute this assertion, since it is the correct tactical political move in the current global situation, but, as they say, to promise is not to marry, since the red-haired negotiator and his leading Zionist twins (Zyatkoff + Vitkoff) showed the price of trusting the words of Zionist gentlemen in two separate states, one of which has undeservedly occupied Palestinian territory since 1947.
            According to some rumors, Epstein is alive and possibly in the Middle East, which is why it is so difficult for the Washington narcissist, mired in all sins, to break free from the noose of joint actions with Bibi against the IRI in the Middle East.
            And the events of the last 3-4 days after the call and conversation between Washington and the Kremlin have escalated
            1. The Israeli Air Force attacked the Russian House in Lebanon.
            2. Bandera's attack on Bryansk and a strategic enterprise with casualties.
            3. About 12 or more strikes on the gas pipelines of the Turkish Stream and Blue Stream gas pipelines
            4. Mutual exchange of opinions between the Kremlin and the EU and disavowal of the issue of oil/gas exports against the backdrop of Iran’s military actions.
            According to long-standing rumors, the false West is planning to open a second front against Russia in Transnistria.
            My final conclusion, given my trump cards (the Kremlin, the General Staff, and the Ministry of Defense clearly have more of them) is that a window of opportunity is opening to decisively achieve a turning point in the Central Military District, inflicting a strategic defeat on the Bander-Nazi regime in Kiev.
            The red-haired Satan's visit to Beijing on February 31, 2026, must take place under the supervision of a united position between Moscow and the Kremlin against the backdrop of the war between the Zionists and the mattress makers in the Middle East, and must create the condition that there is no alternative to a "three-way deal" with face-saving for all three world powers.
            No sane politician needs an escalation leading to a transition to the TMV.
            1. +1
              12 March 2026 23: 05
              Quote: ZovSailor
              No sane politician needs an escalation leading to a transition to the TMV.

              A misconception. Politics is determined not by politicians, but by their masters and puppeteers, and they have their own reasons, which are very far from human ethics.
              Quote: ZovSailor
              has been unfairly occupying Palestinian territory since 1947.

              At the time, it made strategic sense, which is why Stalin created this state to counter England and their protectorate in the region. We tricked them so badly that their entire empire fell apart. It also allowed us to delay the US and England's plans to attack the USSR until we had nuclear weapons. A whole range of measures were taken to achieve this. Well, things turned out the way they did. To a large extent, it was due to the sabotage activities of a British agent within Khrushchev's Central Committee. It was highly classified. Intelligence knew from its agents in MI6 that such an agent existed, but they couldn't establish his name... back then. And then Stalin was gone. He overlooked Khrushchev.
              Quote: ZovSailor
              According to some rumors, Epstein is alive and possibly in the Middle East.

              I heard about this version, I’m not sure if it’s true, but British propaganda has been actively playing up this topic in recent days.
              Trump was brought to power by New York's most influential Hasidic community in the United States, and he promised them this... he had to answer for his promises. But now that the promise has been fulfilled, and all the screw-ups and set-ups turned out to be Netanyahu's fault... he can declare "victory" and, with a sense of duty fulfilled (to the Hasidim), return to his business. And by all appearances, that's exactly what he wants to do. And as for the dirty rumors about some files with dirt on Trump... those files were in the hands of the Democrats when they wanted to put him away or prevent him from running. But nothing of the sort was done. So, most likely, it was his obligations to the New York community that forced him into this mess. Now he'll have to work his way out of it.
              Quote: ZovSailor
              1. The Israeli Air Force attacked the Russian House in Lebanon.
              2. Bandera's attack on Bryansk and a strategic enterprise with casualties.
              3. About 12 or more strikes on the gas pipelines of the Turkish Stream and Blue Stream gas pipelines

              This is all a reaction of the English to disrupt certain agreements.
              Quote: ZovSailor
              4. Mutual exchange of opinions between the Kremlin and the EU and disavowal of the issue of oil/gas exports against the backdrop of Iran’s military actions.

              For us, the main goal in this reality is lifting US sanctions. Europe is unimportant – the premium markets of East and Southeast Asia await us. On our part, this seems like some kind of maneuvering to achieve the desired result. We don't need to save Europe. On the contrary, their crisis and problems should be exacerbated. That's why our supplies are being redirected to Asia.
              Quote: ZovSailor
              The West is planning to open a second front against Russia in Transnistria.

              They've been saying this since 2022. But ss@T.
              Quote: ZovSailor
              A window of opportunity is opening to achieve a turning point in the strategic military situation by decisive action and inflicting a strategic defeat.

              It would be nice if that were the case. The question is how it will be in reality. We haven't had much success so far.
              Quote: ZovSailor
              create a condition where there is no alternative to a "three-way deal" while preserving the face of all three world powers.

              That wouldn't be bad, but this kind of thing happens on the eve of victory. And who have we defeated/are we defeating/are we planning to defeat? At whose expense are we making friends?
              At the expense of Europe?
              The sheep is so thin that it won't be enough for three.
              More England and its legacy?
              Things are getting more interesting, but consensus is unlikely at this stage. Because the British are sticking out from all three governments (especially Russia and China). Consensus can only be reached by dismantling the Bretton Woods System. If all parties are ready for this... a Vision of the Future must be formed.
              Does he exist?
  5. +1
    8 March 2026 10: 55
    The partners did not appreciate Putin's unilateral restrictions...
  6. 0
    8 March 2026 15: 44
    By the way, China, Pakistan, India, France, Great Britain, etc. were not included in the Treaty on Nuclear Forces. A new comprehensive treaty is needed. NO ONE needs a nuclear war. Strategic nuclear forces are needed only for deterrence, not for use.
    1. 0
      9 March 2026 02: 07
      Quote: vadim dok
      NO ONE needs a nuclear war. Strategic nuclear forces are needed only for deterrence, not for use.

      Are you seriously?
      The South Korean States have approved long-range cruise missiles, now with a range of 3000 km.
      And it's the same with Japan. Their cruise missiles fly at 2000 km.
      Do you think it’s a coincidence that these works have been going on for 10 years?
  7. 0
    8 March 2026 15: 45
    They're sharpening the hatchet for us, we just have to figure out when they'll hit us with it.
  8. +1
    8 March 2026 22: 54
    Quote: bayard
    But who deceived you, and not for the first time, I don't know. With at least 90% modernized strategic nuclear forces against the ancient potential of the US strategic nuclear forces, should we fear deception?

    Quote: bayard
    But who deceived you, and not for the first time, I don't know. With at least 90% modernized strategic nuclear forces against the ancient potential of the US strategic nuclear forces, should we fear deception?

    The start of the Second Military Operation clearly demonstrated the state of the army's logistics. The only reason we don't know about the Strategic Nuclear Forces is because it's a classified expense item. And I'd really like to think there weren't any Timur Ivanovs there.
  9. -1
    9 March 2026 05: 07
    What, these Minutemen can still fly? Your works are wondrous, Lord, especially with the kind of embezzlement that's happening in the US...
  10. 0
    9 March 2026 09: 18
    further evidence that pen-do-sam cannot be trusted under any circumstances