TPG1000C Electromagnetic System: Chinese Science vs. Communication Satellites

6 433 24
TPG1000C Electromagnetic System: Chinese Science vs. Communication Satellites
A TPG1000C prototype in laboratory conditions. Photo by SZIYAT


The rapid development and widespread use of satellite communications has necessitated the development of means to suppress them. Various systems and complexes have been proposed for disrupting enemy communications, and China recently developed another such prototype. The TPG1000C prototype is claimed to demonstrate record-breaking technical performance and is capable of achieving its intended objectives with increased effectiveness.



Record-breaking performance


The development of a new "electromagnetic weapon" for countering enemy electronics was conducted at the Northwest Institute of Nuclear Science and Technology (Xi'an). The necessary research and design work was conducted by specialists from the Microwave Technology Laboratory, led by Wang Gang. The project's key findings were presented in a paper for the peer-reviewed journal High Power Laser and Particle Beams and published in late December of last year.

The goal of the new SZYaT project was to develop a promising electromagnetic system suitable for use in electronic warfare and related fields. Such a system would generate a highly powerful and long-duration directed electromagnetic pulse capable of suppressing or damaging the electronics of a target.

Similar systems have already been developed in China and other countries, but they all had certain drawbacks. The main one was an unfavorable balance between operational and service characteristics. For example, the high pulse power came at the cost of increased size and weight, as well as corresponding energy consumption.

A team of Chinese specialists led by Wang Gang studied domestic and foreign experience in the field of electromagnetic weaponsNew technical solutions were proposed aimed at optimizing the design and improving overall performance. These proposals were confirmed both theoretically and through rig experiments.

SZIYAT specialists then built a full-scale prototype of the "electromagnetic gun," designated TPG1000C. The device passed tests and confirmed its design characteristics. Furthermore, it was used to demonstrate the correctness of the chosen technical solutions.

During testing, pulse power of up to 20 GW was demonstrated. Continuous operation lasted up to 1 minute. The system can generate up to 3 pulses in a single activation. During testing, it generated a total of 200 pulses. However, full details of these tests are not being disclosed.


Starlink communications satellites during launch. Photo: SpaceX

Technical features


For obvious reasons, SZIYAT scientists chose not to disclose all the details of their project. Even the complete design of the prototype "gun" is not subject to publication. For example, the article in the scientific journal included a photograph showing only a portion of the TPG1000C, with some of its components obscured. Whether the entire device will ever be revealed remains to be seen.

The photograph depicts a complex metal casing composed of a series of cylinders and cones. It has access hatches and various components of unknown purpose. Apparently, the system is subjected to high loads during operation, necessitating increased metal thickness and the use of numerous fasteners.

Full details of the TPG1000C design are not disclosed, but it can be assumed that this system is fundamentally no different from similar developments. It is expected to include a device for energy storage and output, a microwave generator, and a set of auxiliary equipment. Control devices, etc., are also required.

The system must operate using an external power source. Using built-in technology, it must accumulate energy and then use it to generate powerful electromagnetic pulses.

The TPG1000C in its current form is approximately 4 meters long. Its weight without additional systems and devices is approximately 5 tons. However, the "gun" requires various additional components, which increase the overall size and weight of the system.

The developers note that the prototype system could have been even larger and heavier. The length was reduced by implementing a new layout. Typically, such "guns" are built using a linear layout with the units positioned one behind the other. The TPG1000C project uses a U-shaped layout, which reduced the length by almost half. The new design reduced the overall weight of the system. Aluminum was also used instead of steel. This material change reduced the weight of the system by approximately a third.

Other solutions have also been implemented. For example, grooved insulator plates, which demonstrate greater efficiency, are used. A new oil composition is also used as insulation. These measures have significantly improved the energy performance of the TPG1000C.

Practical perspectives


Currently, the TPG1000C system exists only as a prototype used in laboratory conditions. It is a fairly large and heavy device, requiring placement on a special stand and movement on rails. However, in the future, this prototype may be used to develop a system suitable for practical use.


The antenna assembly of the Starlink user terminal. Photo: US Department of Defense

A recent SZIYAT publication mentions the possibility of mounting the TPG1000C or a similar system on a ground-based self-propelled platform. Such a system could be built on a truck, a semi-trailer, or in a container. The possibility of creating a aviation modifications or variants for placement on spacecraft. The last two proposals are of particular interest.

An "electromagnetic gun" with a power of up to 20 GW is capable of solving a wide range of combat missions involving the suppression or destruction of enemy electronics. Using pulses of varying power, frequency, and duration, it can affect various electronic systems. However, for obvious reasons, the TPG1000C system is of greatest interest when used at maximum power.

A gigawatt-power pulse can strike hardened targets and/or do so at long ranges. Specifically, the system's developers openly claim its ability to jam communications satellites in low orbits. Broadband internet access systems such as Starlink or OneWeb are being considered as such targets.

A mobile, airborne, or space-based system based on the TPG1000C will be able to disable or destroy satellite electronics, thereby disrupting enemy communications systems. However, orbital altitude or resistance to interference will not provide protection against electromagnetic interference.

It's worth noting that SZYaT's new "electromagnetic gun" design is based on well-known and proven solutions. These were scaled up as required, achieving high performance characteristics. New ideas were used only to optimize dimensions and weight.

The new SZIYAT project has demonstrated that even available technologies can achieve record-breaking performance. Furthermore, it offers at least a theoretical possibility of creating new "weapons" of this kind with the required level of parameters and combat capabilities in the foreseeable future.

Accordingly, in the future, the Chinese army may order and receive electromagnetic combat systems capable of solving various tasks. With these systems, the PLA will be able to suppress or disable enemy communications systems, including the most modern and effective ones.

It's worth noting that the PLA has long shown interest in weapons based on so-called new physical principles. At a minimum, several such systems have reached the point of field and field trials. Now, it can be expected that the army will take an interest in SZYAT's developments and initiate their development into a fully-fledged system for practical implementation.
24 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +3
    10 March 2026 04: 53
    During testing, pulse power of up to 20 GW was demonstrated. Continuous operation lasted up to 1 minute. The system can generate up to 3 pulses in a single activation. During testing, it generated a total of 200 pulses.

    That is, 1 pulse lasts 1*10-4 seconds, and 1 pulse is 100 kW, or 30 J. All of this should hit a satellite in an orbit 500 km away. The slant range will be greater, depending on the location of this epic installation. Taking into account the attenuation of the electromagnetic wave, what will hit the satellite? The fact that the installation will emit pulses for a minute does not mean it can disable the satellite.
    1. +2
      10 March 2026 05: 54
      Those. 1 pulse per 1*10-4 sec

      Continuous operation lasts up to 1 minute. The system can generate up to 3 pulses per activation.
      That is, 50 pulses per second or 1 pulse per 0.02 seconds = 2 * 10-2 sec.

      and 1 pulse is 100 kW.

      pulse power up to 20 GW

      and 1 pulse is 100 kW or 30 J

      kW is power, and J is a unit of energy.
      1. -2
        10 March 2026 06: 06
        Quote: smart fellow
        That is, 50 pulses per second or 1 pulse per 0.02 seconds = 2 * 10-2.

        Mmm. The operating time is unknown, but 3 pulses are indicated for a single activation. A total of 200 pulses were generated, with a maximum duration of 1 minute (approximately). It's possible that 200 pulses were generated in 1 minute. Although, of course, this is an incorrect assumption.
        Quote: smart fellow
        pulse power up to 20 GW

        And right there, the total capacity is stated as 20 GW. Can you produce 20 GW in 1*10-s?
        Quote: smart fellow
        kW is power, and J is a unit of energy.

        It's clear, I just converted it into impulse energy.
        1. +2
          10 March 2026 06: 08
          Possibly 200 thousand imp. per 1 min.

          It is written that “During the tests, it produced a total of 200 thousand pulses,” i.e. not in 1 second.

          And right there, the total capacity is stated as 20 GW. Can you produce 20 GW in 1*10-s?

          This is power, you are confusing it with energy.
          1. -1
            10 March 2026 06: 10
            Quote: smart fellow
            This is power, you are confusing it with energy.

            No. Regarding the energy, I recalculated how much of it is in the impulse.
            Regarding the 20 GW capacity, I say that there cannot be so much in one impulse; it is clearly cumulative.
            1. +5
              10 March 2026 06: 16
              Regarding energy, I recalculated how much of it is in the impulse.

              This is impossible because the pulse duration is unknown.
              Regarding the 20 GW capacity, I say that there cannot be so much in one impulse; it is clearly cumulative.

              Power is not summed up, this is a new word in science.
              1. +2
                10 March 2026 08: 55
                Quote: smart fellow
                Power is not summed up,

                Of course, summing power over time yields energy. But don't forget about spectrum. The spectral power density at the satellite receiver input is a much more important indicator. And even a power of less than a megawatt is enough to burn out the feeder line of not only the receiver but also the transmitter.
                1. +2
                  10 March 2026 08: 59
                  Of course, by summing up the power over time we get energy.

                  Work, power, and energy are fundamental concepts in mechanics. Energy is the ability to perform work, measured in joules (J). Work is the quantitative measure of change in energy, also measured in joules. Power is the rate at which work is performed, measured in watts.
                  1. +2
                    10 March 2026 09: 37
                    Quote: smart fellow
                    Work, power and energy

                    Congratulations, you definitely got a 5 in physics in 7th grade.
                    1. +2
                      10 March 2026 10: 10
                      I'll tell you more, I taught physics at school for 1 year.
  2. +1
    10 March 2026 05: 50
    Power levels of 20 GW are not unheard of. They're quite comparable to high-power radars. If the Chinese managed to concentrate this power in a fairly narrow frequency spectrum while simultaneously tunable across a wide range of satellite operations, then, when combined with a highly directional antenna, it could penetrate not only the receiving stages but also burn out the transmitting modules. However, I believe the purpose of such systems is still to temporarily "blind" satellites.
    1. 0
      26 June 2026 12: 36
      That's 20 GW, not 20 MW. The world's most powerful radar by peak power, the AN/FPS-85, has a peak power of only 32 MW. The Soviet over-the-horizon radar Duga had a peak power of only 10 MW. The American AN/FPS-132 missile early warning radar has a peak power of a few megawatts. A peak power of 20 GW is a level completely unattainable for radars.
  3. +1
    10 March 2026 10: 05
    I'll just mention the information security aspect. It's not necessary to know how and what they did, and there are many questions in this area. The main thing is to know how to create a technology for an efficient energy process of energy generation and momentum transfer in a flow in a continuous medium. They lack the fundamental knowledge to understand these processes, which means they have limits to both the results and the quality factor of the system. Most importantly, they will encounter problems of self-induction processes, which will grow along with the growth of achievable results, ultimately leading either to destruction or a halt in development. No theory, no progress.
  4. +1
    10 March 2026 10: 13
    As an amateur, I'm interested in whether a magnetron is analogous to the working fluid in a laser, or is it more of an antenna?
    1. +2
      10 March 2026 19: 29
      Quote from cpls22
      working fluid
      The classical definition of a working fluid must be capable of converting kinetic energy. But if we delve into the physics of the processes, in a nutshell, a laser is a quantum resonator, and a magnetron is a vacuum-tube resonator. As we can see, they share the presence of resonance as the primary characteristic of energy generation. It should be noted that the former is based on quantum mechanics, while the latter refers to wave theory or electrodynamics. Although they share the same principle, Planck's constant, the processes occurring in them are different.
      1. 0
        10 March 2026 19: 39
        Thank you! It turns out that a magnetron can't produce a narrow beam like a laser. recourse
        As far as I understand, quantum mechanics and wave theory with electrodynamics are just different ways of describing and calculating physical processes.
        Is it possible to create a microwave beam like a laser/maser?
        1. +1
          10 March 2026 19: 51
          Quote from cpls22
          Is it possible to create a microwave beam like a laser/maser?

          Of course. The beam width is determined solely by the phase synchronicity of the waves and is determined by the quality and relative size of the antenna or laser focusing systems.
          1. 0
            10 March 2026 20: 16
            Quote: Vitaly.17
            Quote from cpls22
            Is it possible to create a microwave beam like a laser/maser?

            Of course..

            I wonder why it hasn't been made yet. recourse What's the catch?
            1. +1
              10 March 2026 20: 26
              Quote from cpls22
              загвоздка

              in the electrical strength of materials. High-power electromagnetic waves simply break through all dielectrics.
            2. 0
              19 May 2026 11: 30
              The US doesn't allow us to do this.
          2. 0
            26 June 2026 12: 29
            The beam width is determined only by the antenna aperture and the wavelength, and increasing coherence can only increase the peak radiation power.
  5. 0
    10 March 2026 12: 11
    WHY NOT DESTROY STARLINK from Iranian territory while the war is going on?
  6. 0
    19 May 2026 11: 29
    China has once again demonstrated the superiority of the socialist system. This is precisely why the USSR, led by the hunchbacked Yeltsin clique, sold it out at the behest of the United States.
  7. 0
    27 May 2026 20: 33
    Quote from cpls22
    As an amateur, I'm interested in whether a magnetron is analogous to the working fluid in a laser, or is it more of an antenna?

    A magnetron is a lamp.