Iran promptly released detailed images of the results of the incoming strikes on the US radar station in Qatar.

43 043 164
Iran promptly released detailed images of the results of the incoming strikes on the US radar station in Qatar.

Shortly after striking an American radar in Qatar, Iran released detailed images of the aftermath. The images show both before and after views of the American military base. Moreover, the after image shows a gaping hole in the dome that concealed the radar, estimated to be worth at least $1 billion. The before image was allegedly taken last year.

It is known that, together with a similar radar detection and electronic intelligence station in Manama (Bahrain), the American radar in Qatar was the basis of the US “radar vision” throughout the Middle East.



The image also shows extensive damage to structures adjacent to the radar's protective dome. This includes the radar's command center.

Not only is the speed with which Iran presented the results of its missile and drone strike on the American radar (its equivalent in Bahrain, as Military Review previously reported, was also hit) noteworthy, but also the detail of the images. Now, there's a debate online about whether these images were taken with drone, or it's the work of a remote sensing satellite's cameras. There's also a theory that it's actually the product of a neural network run by Iranian media.

Meanwhile, the Omani Foreign Minister, who had previously declared great progress in the US-Iranian talks, is now calling on the US to stop attacks on Iran, citing the following argument:

This is not your war.

As a reminder, at least 80 civilians were killed in one of today's strikes on Iran. Most of them were children, students at a school.
164 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 23+
    28 February 2026 19: 50
    Here we are, flying from Iran.
    1. 37+
      28 February 2026 19: 57
      They destroyed a beautifully large radar. It makes my heart happy))) good
      1. -27
        28 February 2026 20: 02
        We need to hit the personnel, not the radar.
        1. 43+
          28 February 2026 20: 05
          On the contrary, by radar. That way, the Americans and the Jews will see less. First, the radar, then the infantry.
          1. +4
            28 February 2026 20: 17
            Video link.

            The moment the Iranian Shahed-136 kamikaze drone lands, as seen by radar at the US naval base in Bahrain.

        2. 18+
          28 February 2026 20: 08
          They'll restore the personnel in no time, but a radar worth a billion is unlikely... And the radar won't hide in a shelter like the personnel)))
          1. +4
            28 February 2026 20: 30
            The losses of personnel in the Special Forces are perceived very painfully, so I doubt it.
        3. The comment was deleted.
        4. +9
          28 February 2026 21: 21
          We need to hit the radar, and American and Jewish soldiers will be born to Jewish and American women
        5. 0
          2 March 2026 19: 38
          The pocket is the Americans' most sensitive spot. The harder you hit it, the faster they'll learn to distinguish between hardship and deprivation.
      2. 24+
        28 February 2026 20: 05
        Apparently, Chinese satellite reconnaissance is working for all the money)))
        1. +8
          28 February 2026 20: 13
          By the way, yes. And you can't blame the Chinese. Smart.
        2. +9
          28 February 2026 20: 17
          I would have preferred the images to have been provided by Roscosmos! Ah, dreams, dreams...
          1. 0
            28 February 2026 20: 21
            I would too, as President 404 said: "We have something, we want it")))
        3. +5
          28 February 2026 20: 42
          Quote: TermNachTER
          Apparently, Chinese satellite reconnaissance is working for all the money)))

          In the video, the dome was completely destroyed (and here it was simply punctured), and all sorts of suspicious places were present.
          Even the cars are in the same places, somehow too quickly for filming. And the buildings below have become different.
          I went into Google, and yes, artificial intelligence did add two buildings nearby, but simply deleted one.
          You are being fed cabbage rolls with neuronka
          1. +5
            28 February 2026 21: 10
            Unfortunately, you're right. They've outdone us, or rather, those who are willing to believe it. It might be true, but the photo is definitely fake.
            1. +3
              1 March 2026 03: 18
              It may be true, but the photo is definitely fake.
              Well, there is a video.
              https://ok.ru/video/12206981778048 Сейчас конечно всё на ИИ можно свалить, но тогда нужно дождаться того чего никогда не будет, а именно признания Пентагона о своих потерях... Но это вряд ли, у Трампа всё американское бессмертно)))
          2. +6
            28 February 2026 21: 15
            The first photo there could have been taken several years ago. Something could have changed in the surrounding buildings since then.
            1. +6
              1 March 2026 05: 57
              Quote: Lena Petrova
              The first photo there could have been taken several years ago. Something could have changed in the surrounding buildings since then.

              And the cars?
          3. +3
            28 February 2026 21: 36
            Actually, according to the Iranians, two such objects were hit
            A Shahed missile destroyed an American SIGINT station in Bahrain. Another similar facility, according to the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps press service, was hit in Qatar.

            To be 100% sure, it would be good to look at both objects, before and after.
          4. +2
            28 February 2026 22: 53
            Google maps are also quite good at drawing maps, especially for Jews, so it's too early to draw any conclusions. However, judging by the incoming traffic to Jews, the Patriots and TAADs are having trouble with external control.
          5. +1
            1 March 2026 00: 02
            Yes, the damage is clearly not what it would be in real life. Sad.
        4. -1
          28 February 2026 21: 22
          You can go to Google Maps and look at this radar.
          1. +5
            28 February 2026 22: 24
            They are not updated every day, but sometimes every few months or even years.
        5. +2
          1 March 2026 05: 56
          Quote: TermNachTER
          Apparently, Chinese satellite reconnaissance is working for all the money)))

          Fake photo. Some radar was destroyed, but these photos are AI.
          1. +1
            1 March 2026 11: 26
            Are there really that many radars that size? Judging by the way the Jews are receiving incoming calls, the "patriots" are having problems with external control. And they were the ones providing the external control.
            1. +2
              1 March 2026 13: 19
              I don't argue with the radar being damaged. But these photos are fake.
      3. +1
        2 March 2026 12: 29
        ...keep it up!!!...don't stop...
    2. +1
      28 February 2026 20: 12
      The most interesting thing to learn is the losses. Trump clearly didn't expect this turn of events; he even canceled his speech...
      1. +2
        2 March 2026 04: 55
        Damn it, kitten, it won't happen! The original has a stronger word!
    3. +7
      28 February 2026 21: 17
      Quote: Donna_Rosa_dAlvadores
      Here we are, flying from Iran.

      The Iranians promised to use missiles they didn't use last time. This time, they used the Sajil missile. It's said to have a takeoff weight of up to 20 tons, and a throw-weight of up to 1,5 tons.
      1. +2
        2 March 2026 05: 00
        Today I watched a video in excellent quality of how the Fifth Fleet headquarters was destroyed.
        And now friends have sent a video of the heroes being carried out in closets under a flag.
        Plus, they also hit Cyprus with a martyr. Chimney sweeps removed three planes from there, just in case.
        But seriously, this is an example of how to screw the West. The only problem is, the people in the towers aren't like that...
  2. 17+
    28 February 2026 19: 52
    I hope the Iranians leave the Stars and Stripes without balls for their outrageous behavior.
    1. +9
      28 February 2026 21: 12
      The result will be good, even if they sink a couple of destroyers, zero damage. If they seriously damage an aircraft carrier, even worse. I've been saying this for a long time: the Americans won't withstand such losses; we need to strike where they're vulnerable. If there are losses to the fleet, the operation will be immediately terminated.
      1. +2
        28 February 2026 21: 21
        One of them went down the drain. And he's fighting for survival. Al Jazeera showed a photo, though it's really quite scary.
        1. +3
          28 February 2026 21: 25
          We'll see, it's still early days, you can't trust anyone. We'll have to wait a couple of days.
      2. +2
        2 March 2026 05: 01
        The aircraft carrier escaped at full speed...
  3. 25+
    28 February 2026 19: 52
    Well done Persians, keep it up and continue beating the Americans.
  4. 14+
    28 February 2026 19: 53
    It's been a while since we've seen pin_dos in the powder rooms, hip, hip, hurray!
  5. -19
    28 February 2026 19: 53
    Radar is good, of course, but are there photos of destroyed enemy aircraft and ships?
    1. -11
      28 February 2026 20: 02
      Sergey Kondratyev
      Radar is good, of course.

      which concealed a radar estimated to be worth at least $1 billion.

      The radar's antenna mast unit (AMU) was hidden under a radio-transparent dome with a hole in it. The transmitter and receiver units are separate, and it's not certain they were damaged.
      1. -4
        28 February 2026 20: 08
        Complete nonsense.
        The United States began the process of delivering and building the AN/FPS-132 Block 5 airborne early warning radar in Qatar around 2013–2017.
        1. -5
          28 February 2026 20: 10
          Sergey Kondratyev
          Complete nonsense.

          I don't understand what you see as nonsense? Please explain.
          1. -1
            28 February 2026 20: 14
            What did I write to you that you didn't understand? The radar is new. It was put into operation in 2017.
            1. 0
              28 February 2026 20: 22
              So what if it's new? How does that explain its combat readiness? If the photo is real, I can say the radar is not combat-ready.
              1. -1
                28 February 2026 20: 23
                Yes, it can. According to your theory, a ton of money was poured into the radar to stop it from working?
                1. +1
                  28 February 2026 20: 27
                  Sergey Kondratyev
                  According to your version, a lot of money was poured into the radar so that it wouldn’t work?

                  In my opinion, the damage was done to the antenna mast (located under the dome), not the entire radar. This means it might be possible to restore it.
                  1. +1
                    28 February 2026 20: 29
                    The photo shows that the surrounding buildings are destroyed. There's no point in rebuilding, but in rebuilding. And these are years old.
                    1. -6
                      28 February 2026 20: 32
                      Sergey Kondratyev
                      The photo shows that the surrounding buildings have been destroyed.

                      We don't know what was there. Staff quarters, a cafeteria, a laundry, power generators... Radar equipment could also be located in the underground rooms.
                      1. 0
                        28 February 2026 20: 34
                        The set for Iran. It took four years to build. If you don't know, don't write then.
                      2. -2
                        28 February 2026 20: 37
                        Sergey Kondratyev
                        The set for Iran. It took four years to build.

                        If you know everything, then good. I don't know, I'm just guessing. Maybe it's just a false position (radar imitation).
                      3. -1
                        28 February 2026 20: 38
                        Or maybe it can't? Or maybe cats are Martians? Don't you have anyone else to argue with?
                      4. The comment was deleted.
                      5. -2
                        28 February 2026 20: 49
                        I'm not an AI expert and can't say whether they're real or not.
                      6. 0
                        28 February 2026 21: 08
                        Yes, in the video the nature of the dome's destruction is different.
                      7. +2
                        2 March 2026 05: 00
                        You're wasting your time here with Zionist trolls! Vijimo has a Hasbara mindset of disputing any losses and picking on everything. Ignore them; they're not worth wasting your time on.
                      8. +4
                        28 February 2026 22: 31
                        Why did they give him the minus marks? For what? He spoke objectively. When planning such facilities, the possibility of an attack is always taken into account, and it's logical to disperse operators, electronics, air defense missiles (if the facility has them), etc., and the most vulnerable part—the antenna—around each other. It's simply logical. And the electronic equipment needs additional protection, especially since it's a stationary facility, where weight isn't a concern, and the facility itself is expensive.
                      9. 0
                        2 March 2026 10: 29
                        Andrey62
                        Why did you give me minuses, for what?

                        There would be something to hit for. It wasn't me.
    2. -6
      28 February 2026 21: 04
      Fuck Tibidoh)))))) You could have fought WWII in three days))) rapid-fire
      1. 0
        28 February 2026 21: 05
        Why all of a sudden? Why this nonsense?
        1. -2
          28 February 2026 21: 06
          Aren't your desires too great for the first day of database management??? What other pictures would you like?
          1. +2
            28 February 2026 21: 08
            I just said that I wish for the defeat of the USA and Israel in the form of destroyed equipment, what's wrong with you?
            1. 0
              28 February 2026 21: 08
              Oh...you're not writing this comment for yourself...be more specific.
              1. 0
                28 February 2026 21: 12
                What's wrong with you? Don't you have anyone to argue with?
  6. +3
    28 February 2026 19: 53
    Wow, that's quite a blast! I think they've stopped working there.
  7. +6
    28 February 2026 19: 53
    Iran promptly released detailed images of the results of the incoming strikes on the US radar station in Qatar.

    If only our Russian Ministry of Defense would provide the results of our missile strikes on the Kakeli so quickly. It's not even worth mentioning the Oreshnik missile—they should at least show the results once.
    1. -23
      28 February 2026 19: 58
      Why do you need them, may I ask? Want to see some war? That's how the military recruitment office works, you'll see it all for yourself.
      1. 21+
        28 February 2026 20: 02
        Quote: Sergey Kondratiev
        Why do you need them, may I ask? Want to see some war? That's how the military recruitment office works, you'll see it all for yourself.

        You yourself wrote above that you'd like to see photos of "enemy planes and ships," and then immediately respond to the person asking the question, "Why do you need them if you have a military registration and enlistment office?" By the same logic: why do you need planes and ships?
        1. -9
          28 February 2026 20: 07
          I want to see other people's photos, not my own. Don't you see the difference? I believe all information from a war zone should be strictly censored. If the quality of our photos needs to be kept secret, then that's what we should do.
          1. +5
            28 February 2026 20: 08
            That's how you should have responded to the person right away. But from your two mutually contradictory comments, it's hard to understand what you want and what you don't.
            1. The comment was deleted.
      2. The comment was deleted.
        1. The comment was deleted.
      3. -2
        28 February 2026 20: 13
        Why do you need them, may I ask? Want to see some war? That's how the military recruitment office works, you'll see it all for yourself.
        б
        You probably enjoy having your ears filled with bullshit? The last time I went to the military recruitment office was 30 years ago; I'm too old for war. But if the Motherland orders me to dodge the draft, I won't.
        1. -7
          28 February 2026 20: 17
          Yes, yes, if someone wants to do something, then he looks for a way to do it, and if someone wants not to do something, then he looks for excuses not to do it.
          If you don't want to be bullied, go there yourself. War is no place for democracy and free speech.
          1. -2
            28 February 2026 20: 24
            If you don't want someone to pour it into your ears, go there yourself.

            I told you that age and associated illnesses.
            1. -2
              28 February 2026 20: 27
              A guy at my place of work left for the SVO. Well, not much of a guy, really: short and skinny, maybe six feet tall with a cap, and over fifty years old. He's already gray. I think he had some ailments, too. No problem, he's gone.
              1. -4
                28 February 2026 20: 33
                I was sacked by a guy at work at the SVO. Well, not much of a guy, really: short and skinny, about six feet tall with a cap, and over 50 years old.
                Maybe he left because he was sick? Or maybe it was the loan, the mortgage, or the kids not having a place to live?
                1. +3
                  28 February 2026 20: 35
                  Maybe. It's just that "if someone wants to do something, they look for a way to do it, and if someone doesn't want to do something, they look for excuses not to do it."
                2. -1
                  28 February 2026 21: 04
                  Quote: private person
                  Or maybe there is a loan, a mortgage, or the children don’t have a place to live?


                  Don't judge everyone by yourself. For many, "Motherland" is more than just an empty phrase.

                  Quote: private person
                  The last time I was at the military registration and enlistment office was 30 years ago; I’m too old for war.


                  But it's perfect for the "zone." Considering how often you violate Article 280.3 of the Russian Criminal Code here.
                  1. 0
                    28 February 2026 21: 53
                    But it's perfect for the "zone." Considering how often you violate Article 280.3 of the Russian Criminal Code here.

                    Are you sick? How does defamation manifest itself?
                    1. -3
                      28 February 2026 22: 10
                      Quote: private person
                      How does discrediting manifest itself?


                      Read your posts for the last month.
              2. -3
                28 February 2026 20: 57
                Quote: Sergey Kondratiev
                I think there were some sores too. No problem, he went.


                If the illnesses had been serious, I would not have passed the medical examination.
                1. 0
                  28 February 2026 20: 59
                  Oh, I'd love to tell you how they're taking you to the SVO now, but I won't. They'll put you in jail for defamation. Better keep quiet.
                  1. -1
                    28 February 2026 21: 05
                    My personal experience is a little different. So it's best that you keep quiet.
        2. -3
          28 February 2026 23: 28
          The last time I was at the military registration and enlistment office was 30 years ago; I’m too old for war.

          A stupid excuse about strength and age

          After many years in prison and on the sloppy sea, the prisoners successfully took part in the assault on Bakhmut.
    2. -2
      28 February 2026 20: 22
      Quote: private person
      There's nothing to even talk about "Oreshnik", they should at least show results once.


      What result do you hope to see? The "Oreshnik" missile was used in a non-nuclear version. The goal was to demonstrate the futility of anyone trying to counter it. Those who needed to see it all saw and understood it all. And those "those" weren't in Russia, or even in Ukraine.
      1. -2
        28 February 2026 20: 29
        Those who needed to saw everything and understood everything.

        And what did they understand? That Russia used the expensive "hypersonic weapon" twice? And they even increased the number of strikes on targets in various regions of Russia. As if we're not afraid of the Big Bad Wolf.
        1. -3
          28 February 2026 20: 36
          Quote: private person
          And? What did you understand?


          Well, then ask, for example, at the General Staff of France or the USA. The demonstration was for the Supreme military the leadership of NATO countries, and not for any civilian spooks like Macron or, especially, you.

          Quote: private person
          And they also increased the number of strikes on targets in various regions of Russia.


          Did they increase it in response to Oreshnik? Or would it have been the same without Oreshnik? The answer, in my opinion, is obvious.

          P.S.: There's a feature for inserting a quote. Feel free to use it.
          1. -3
            28 February 2026 21: 57
            Did they increase it in response to Oreshnik? Or would it have been the same without Oreshnik? The answer, in my opinion, is obvious.

            This shows they weren't scared, as you're trying to claim here. And yes, the SVR published that the Frogs and the Little Brits want to supply nuclear weapons to the Huskies.
            1. -3
              28 February 2026 22: 01
              Quote: private person
              This shows that they were not scared as you are trying to claim here.


              Don't attribute your fantasies to me. I didn't write that they were scared.
              1. -2
                28 February 2026 22: 05
                Don't attribute your fantasies to me. I didn't write that they were scared.

                But you suggested: Well, then ask, for example, the General Staff of France or the United States. The demonstration was for the Supreme Military Command of NATO countries. What was the purpose of the demonstration?
                1. -3
                  28 February 2026 22: 09
                  Quote: private person
                  What is the purpose of the demonstration?


                  I wrote this:
                  Quote from kromer
                  The goal was to show the futility of anyone opposing him.


                  And note that the word "scared" doesn't appear here. So, don't come to me with your fantasies.
    3. -3
      28 February 2026 21: 16
      What's there to see? A strike with dummy shells doesn't cause any damage. You can look at a photo of a tank hit with a crowbar—it's a small hole, that's all. If a four-story industrial building was hit and three 200-kg dummy shells hit it from above, you'd see three holes about a meter in diameter in the top floor, and that's it. You won't see that the holes are a meter in each floor and the hole extends 40 meters into the ground.
  8. +7
    28 February 2026 19: 54
    And I'm still waiting for pictures of Oreshnik's arrival...
  9. -3
    28 February 2026 19: 54
    The image of the destruction was created using AI, they say.
    1. +3
      28 February 2026 20: 00
      I watched a video of Shahed diving at the radar and taking it out. Someone posted it on another thread.
      1. +3
        28 February 2026 20: 03
        I don't dispute that Shahed got there, but this photo is most likely an AI hoax. Look at the fence or the roof at the very bottom of the photo; some kind of rectangle has been added there. Plus, there's a difference in the roofs of the buildings in the upper left corner.
        1. -1
          28 February 2026 20: 04
          The main thing is the result, and the fact that they drew a rectangle there and the difference in structures does not change this result.
          1. 0
            28 February 2026 20: 06
            The outcome is still unknown. But the photos are strange, that's a fact. A lot of these days, they're leaking old photos and videos.
        2. 0
          28 February 2026 20: 12
          I agree, this isn't a photo, but a drawing. The damaged cars are still in place. You could say the images are a few minutes apart, but the buildings are completely different in detail, and you can't reconstruct them in a couple of minutes. Plus, instead of a tree, the extension of a building is drawn at the bottom—apparently the AI ​​didn't realize it was a tree and added a building.
        3. WIS
          -5
          28 February 2026 20: 52
          Quote: Warabey
          Shahed got there, I don't argue, but this photo is bullshit

          Do you need a taxi or checkers?
          Reconstruction of buildings, however, is it really so difficult to handle?
          1. +4
            28 February 2026 20: 53
            What are you even talking about? You heard the ringing but don't know where it is?
            1. WIS
              -1
              28 February 2026 21: 00
              Quote: Warabey
              What are you about


              Look at the fence or roof at the very bottom of the photo, some kind of rectangle has been added there.


              There full changes...
              1. +3
                28 February 2026 21: 02
                Well... Eee? Develop your thought further. Didn't they add a rectangle or something?
                1. WIS
                  -3
                  28 February 2026 21: 04
                  Quote: Warabey
                  Well... Eee?

                  If the buildings added over time do not match yours project - Publish yours - we'll compare.
                  1. +2
                    28 February 2026 21: 06
                    What "my project"? Are you even fluent in Russian? I've been saying from the start that the photos of the destruction are a hoax created by a neural network.
                    1. WIS
                      -4
                      28 February 2026 21: 12
                      Quote: Warabey
                      I've been writing from the very beginning

                      continue...
                      1. +2
                        28 February 2026 21: 14
                        Well, actually, I don't need your permission...
  10. -1
    28 February 2026 19: 56
    Great shot and great shot!
    If only our Ministry of Defense were as efficient as this...
    I hope Iran will please us further.
  11. The comment was deleted.
  12. -1
    28 February 2026 19: 57
    The Americans will claim that there was no one there and that this radar station had been abandoned long ago.
    1. -2
      28 February 2026 20: 04
      The Americans said that they evacuated the personnel, and not that the radar was abandoned.
      "The United States began the process of delivering and building the AN/FPS-132 Block 5 early warning radar in Qatar sometime between 2013 and 2017." In what year was the radar long abandoned, when it was only built in 2017?
  13. +3
    28 February 2026 19: 57
    Somehow the outlines of the undestroyed objects in the upper and lower parts of the photographs do not quite match.
    1. +1
      28 February 2026 20: 07
      Quote: ettore
      Somehow the outlines of the undestroyed objects in the upper and lower parts of the photographs do not quite match.

      If you want to paint a picture of destruction, take the original image without any damage and paint the damage. In such images, the contours match perfectly.
      1. +1
        28 February 2026 20: 19
        Quote: Mikhail3
        If you want to paint a picture of destruction, take the original image without any damage and paint the damage. In such images, the contours match perfectly.

        That's what I'm talking about
        1. 0
          1 March 2026 07: 20
          What exactly? It's completely unclear from your comments.
          1. +1
            1 March 2026 10: 52
            Quote: Mikhail3
            What exactly? It's completely unclear from your comments.

            What is drawn and not a real photo.
            1. -1
              1 March 2026 11: 46
              So you misunderstood my comment. It's a shame. It's the slight size discrepancy that lends credibility. Because the redrawn image will be accurate in size because it was taken from the original copy. The discrepancy in size is due to the fact that the photo was taken from a similar, but different, angle. A near-perfect match is definitely a fake. That's how it is.
              1. +1
                1 March 2026 11: 59
                Quote: Mikhail3
                So you misunderstood my comment. It's a shame. It's the slight size discrepancy that lends credibility. Because the redrawn image will be accurate in size because it was taken from the original copy. The discrepancy in size is due to the fact that the photo was taken from a similar, but different, angle. A near-perfect match is definitely a fake. That's how it is.

                No, you misunderstood. I was writing about the mismatch between the contours of undestroyed objects, not their sizes; those are completely different things.
                1. -2
                  1 March 2026 12: 48
                  No, that's it, but you're completely... This wasn't all shot with the same camera. The height changed, and so did the dimensions in the frame. That's what I wrote, but you didn't get it. Don't jump to conclusions about topics you understand absolutely nothing about...
                  1. +1
                    1 March 2026 13: 03
                    Quote: Mikhail3
                    No, it's the same thing, but you're completely... This wasn't all shot with the same camera. The height has changed, and so have the dimensions in the frame.

                    Explain to me, who doesn’t understand, how the shooting height will affect the geometry of the objects indicated by the arrows.
                    P.S. Well, if for you the dimensions and geometry of an object are one and the same, then I pass.
                    1. 0
                      1 March 2026 17: 40
                      Oh, shit! Do you know how to take pictures on your phone? Take two pictures, stand closer in the first one, and further away in the second one.
                      1. 0
                        1 March 2026 18: 19
                        Quote: Mikhail3
                        Oh, shit! Do you know how to take pictures on your phone? Take two pictures, stand closer in the first one, and further away in the second one.

                        Do you mean to say that after this the triangle will become a square?
                        P.S. Just look at the lower left corner of the photos, along the left arrow. After the attack, a radar installation appeared in a place where there was none before, considering that it is a stationary object.
                      2. 0
                        2 March 2026 06: 54
                        The dome of the small radar was blown off by the explosion. It is light, made of radio-transparent plastic; if it had not been attached to the foundation, the wind would have carried it away.
                        You're trying to prove something completely incomprehensible. REAL military action is underway. Anyone who lies like this will lose in a matter of days. More photos will follow, and the lie will scare off supporters and embolden opponents...
                      3. 0
                        2 March 2026 13: 30
                        Quote: Mikhail3
                        The dome of the small radar was blown off by the explosion. It is light, made of radio-transparent plastic; if it had not been attached to the foundation, the wind would have carried it away.

                        And it's standing there, all white and undamaged. Are you serious or are you kidding me? It wasn't there before the impact, but the explosion brought it here so neatly after?
                        Anyone who lies like this will lose in a matter of days. More photos will follow, and the lie will scare off supporters and embolden opponents...

                        In these photos, the lies are obvious to the naked eye; the retouching is very crude. Only a blind person or someone who doesn't want to see them would miss them.
                      4. 0
                        2 March 2026 14: 19
                        Quote: ettore
                        And it stands there, all white and even, without any damage.

                        Is this determined by the little piece that's visible? Who's messing around here? There's no visible retouching, just dirt and bits. And soon, literally within a day or two, they'll tell us for sure whether it's retouching or the real thing. The information will gather quickly.
    2. +2
      28 February 2026 20: 17
      It looks like the AI ​​has been working on the images, revealing many inconsistencies before and after the impact. The outlines of the buildings are different, though it's not immediately obvious, but upon closer inspection, it's clear these images are fake.
      1. WIS
        -2
        28 February 2026 21: 24
        Quote: Borik
        It looks like the photos were manipulated by AI.

        Are you saying that modern cartography, when compiling maps, "glues together the resulting patches" using, for example, BF-6?
  14. 0
    28 February 2026 19: 59
    Ah, I wish we could test the Iranian military at our "get-together" so they could gain experience in modern ground operations. Maybe it'll come in handy in the future. what
    1. -2
      28 February 2026 20: 10
      It is doubtful that the US will conduct a ground operation in Iran; they simply don’t need it.
      But the Saudis, the Qataris... they could very well send them, and this is where the Iranians' experience in conducting ground operations would come in handy. hi
  15. 0
    28 February 2026 20: 01
    The upper parts of the photo are glaringly inconsistent.

    ...The widely circulated "satellite image" of the aftermath of a US radar strike, either at a base in Bahrain or in Qatar, is an AI fake.

    Place coordinates: 26.206960, 50.609708

    The most obvious signs are the cars that remain in the same position in the old and "new" photographs, the mismatched outlines of buildings above and below, and other striking details.
    ...
  16. PN
    +1
    28 February 2026 20: 01
    Great news. Did Doni want a small, victorious war? Doni got his money's worth!
    1. The comment was deleted.
  17. -2
    28 February 2026 20: 04
    Smart. The first step was to blind the enemy. It was most likely these radars that provided operational guidance for both the US and Israel. All that's left are satellites, and they're far less convenient to work with. It must be said that the ayatollahs are far smarter and more educated than Saddam Hussein.
  18. -2
    28 February 2026 20: 05
    That's some serious damage! It's half the price of an Arleigh Burke-class destroyer, but the damage is far more powerful than that.
    1. +1
      28 February 2026 20: 47
      It's a lie. Compare the photos carefully.
      IT specialists in Iran are complete crap.
  19. 0
    28 February 2026 20: 08
    Video has surfaced of a massive fire at a US Navy base in Bahrain. A huge column of black smoke, visible for tens of kilometers, rises from the military facility. Judging by the color, it appears to be fuel tanks burning.
  20. +2
    28 February 2026 20: 10
    An unknown vessel attempting to break through the blockade was fired upon by Iranian warships and sank in the Strait of Hormuz.
    Insurance companies are canceling insurance policies for ships in the Persian Gulf and the Strait of Hormuz, the Financial Times reports.
    1. +1
      1 March 2026 07: 46
      An unknown vessel attempting to break through the blockade was fired upon by Iranian warships.

      Judging by the facts, everything was the other way around - Iranian warships were fired upon with missiles.

      We didn't go further than the piers
  21. The comment was deleted.
  22. 0
    28 February 2026 20: 15
    The US, as always, has no losses.
  23. bbb
    -1
    28 February 2026 20: 17
    Chinese comrades could provide photographs.
  24. 0
    28 February 2026 20: 19
    AI, it's obvious!
    We look closely and analyze...
  25. +5
    28 February 2026 20: 27
    This is not a real photo, but a neurofake.
    1. +3
      28 February 2026 20: 46
      I noticed it right away too. Unfortunately, such fakes don't improve one's reputation.
  26. The comment was deleted.
  27. +1
    28 February 2026 20: 30
    It's not just the efficiency that's noteworthy, with which Iran presented the result of its missile-drone strike on the American radar (its analogue in Bahrain, as Military Review has already reported, by the way, was also hit), but also the detail of the photoa.

    Yeah, some people should take a lesson... Imagine satellite images, at least drawn by AI...
  28. The comment was deleted.
  29. The comment was deleted.
  30. +3
    28 February 2026 20: 45
    Definitely a neural network.
    The building details do not match.
  31. -2
    28 February 2026 21: 02
    ...The nuclear reactor in Dimona has a similar dome. Apparently, the Persians' technological capabilities allow them to place a missile in the very center of this dome.
  32. -1
    28 February 2026 21: 04
    Quote: Vadim_Alekseevich
    We need to hit the personnel, not the radar.

    They'll quickly find other mercenaries, but they won't be able to quickly make a new radar of that level.
  33. +2
    28 February 2026 21: 12
    The photo really does look fake. I can believe that the Americans rebuilt the buildings at the top of the photo for some reason. But for two identical cars (at the bottom of the photo) to be parked in the same places several months later... request
    1. +5
      28 February 2026 21: 16
      Even in the shadows you can see that the "photo" with destruction is a reworked photo without destruction.
    2. -1
      1 March 2026 00: 40
      They're not the same. The second picture looks like a pickup truck, while the first one looks like a minivan.
  34. The comment was deleted.
  35. +1
    28 February 2026 21: 24
    The video clearly showed a rag dummy
  36. +1
    28 February 2026 21: 25
    [quote=Uarabey]You can even see it in the shadows/quote]
    Yes, it is unlikely that two photographs could have the same time of year, time of day, and angle at the same time.
  37. +5
    28 February 2026 22: 29
    Incidentally, this isn't a radar, but a SHF satellite antenna, located at the NCTS facility (a communications station, roughly speaking). Basically, they're fakers, as always.
  38. -3
    28 February 2026 22: 29
    Iran, a small country, wasn't afraid to fight back. We've been unable to put Ukraine and its sponsors' lackeys in their place for five years now. We've long since crossed all the red lines, we keep trumpeting in response to Ukraine's terrorist attacks... and, well, well, well, we tell Poland, France, Great Britain, and so on, but we can do this, we can do that. These bastards only understand force; when will Russia wake up? Although, where's the chance to wake up? Children, friends, loved ones, and all the loot are stored there.
  39. -5
    28 February 2026 22: 54
    Iran, shortly after striking an American radar in Qatar, releases detailed images of the aftermath of the strike. 


    I can’t understand whether it’s Russia or Iran that is a space power?

    Why, after the Iranian strike, satellite images of these strikes were broadcast around the world within hours, while Russia struck twice at some place called Oreshnik, and the world still hasn't seen any images from either satellites or drones. Why is that?
    1. 0
      1 March 2026 21: 28
      What's there to see? A strike with dummy shells doesn't cause any damage. You can look at a photo of a tank hit with a crowbar—a small hole, that's all. If a four-story industrial building was hit and three 200-kg dummy shells hit it from above, you'd see three holes about a meter in diameter in the top floor, and that's it. Plus, there would be meter-wide holes in each floor, and a hole extending 40 meters into the ground (you won't see it in the photo).
  40. -1
    28 February 2026 23: 45
    Damn, even Iran shows its missile strikes on satellites, but we've never seen anything from Ukraine, only reports of defeats, or we only launch foreign satellites into space.
    1. +1
      1 March 2026 00: 05
      Quote from: oleg_627
      or do we only launch foreign satellites into space?

      And also Peresild.
    2. 0
      1 March 2026 01: 27
      Quote from: oleg_627
      We only launch foreign satellites into space.

      Well, we get paid for launching foreign satellites, and...
  41. +1
    1 March 2026 00: 04
    I wonder why Russia doesn't provide such images of the Udars on the RN? Just asking.
  42. 0
    1 March 2026 01: 15
    Quote: Pavel_Bastrygin
    They destroyed a beautifully large radar. It makes my heart happy))) good

    You can say that again. It's beautiful! It's literally "Straight to the Bull's Eye."
  43. +1
    1 March 2026 01: 47
    😂😂 do you really believe the cars were parked exactly on the same place as in the first image? If they explicitly tell you the first image is one year old. Probably AI

    Do you really believe the car was parked in exactly the same spot as in the first photo? If they tell you outright that the first photo is a year old, it's probably the work of AI.
    1. +1
      1 March 2026 04: 28
      Yes, in the comments above they already found out that this is actually AI.
  44. -1
    1 March 2026 07: 51
    When the USA and Israel are no longer on earth, then there will be no wars in the world.
  45. 0
    1 March 2026 12: 44
    Unfortunately, photos and videos no longer prove anything.
  46. 0
    1 March 2026 14: 01
    Moreover, the after-image shows a gaping hole in the dome that hid the radar, estimated to be worth at least $1 billion.

    Without even touching on the reliability of the images, is the radar really worth $1 billion?
    1. 0
      1 March 2026 14: 16
      p.s. This looks a lot like last year's Iranian fake about the downed F-35s and the captured female pilots...
  47. 0
    1 March 2026 15: 18
    Now the internet is debating whether these photos were taken by a drone or the work of cameras from a remote sensing satellite.

    I'm guessing it's a Chinese or Russian satellite!
  48. 0
    2 March 2026 07: 44
    It's neuronka again, but the locals are already euphoric; they're really consuming any copium or hopium...