Iran unveiled its hypersonic Fattah missiles and announced the closure of the Strait of Hormuz.

The Iranian armed forces have unveiled their latest technology rocket weapons. A new wave of strikes against American military bases in the Middle East is underway.

There are reports that the IRGC has begun using modified Fattah missiles. Iran refers to these missiles as hypersonic. According to specifications reported by Iranian television, the medium-range Fattah missiles are capable of reaching speeds of Mach 15. The maximum range of these missiles is 1400 km; other sources say 1500 km.

Accordingly, when missiles are launched from the southwest or west of Iran, for example from the Ilam mountain region, the Fattah missiles can hit any point in Israel.

These same missiles are capable of hitting any US base on the Arabian Peninsula, including bases in Saudi Arabia and Jordan, which have already been hit today. drones and other types of missiles.

At the same time, reports are coming in that the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps has announced the closure of the Strait of Hormuz, a vital transport corridor for the global oil market, to shipping. Using radio, the IRGC is announcing that all vessels are currently prohibited from transiting the Strait of Hormuz for security reasons.

Oil is currently hovering around $73 per barrel. But what will happen once the Hormuz pipeline truly grinds to a halt? Experts believe the price could easily surpass $100 per barrel.

Comments

[Aerolab]

As the saying goes: "Don't wake up trouble while it's quiet."

[Mikhail Ivanov]

It's just that the Jews have become completely insolent since the destruction of Gaza. And Trump has always been insane. They thought they were firing rockets at the Persians, but the Persians started walking all over them.
It's too early to draw conclusions, but this whole affair could cost Red Chaos his presidency. And he'll definitely lose the midterm elections...

[RESEARCHER]

The red-haired maniac might even face impeachment.

[Mikhail Ivanov]

So he's heading towards him at full speed...

[Patriot is listening]

What a strange word this impeachment sounds like in the CIS countries.

[VSO-396]

Quote: Patriot is listening

What a strange word this impeachment sounds like in the CIS countries.

Not in all regions. Russian, and possibly Belarusian regions.

[KZAKVO32923]

The main thing is to destroy the Zionist creatures!

[abc_alex]

Quote: RESEARCHER

The red-haired maniac might even face impeachment.

Why all of a sudden? Impeachment requires a COURT-PROVEN violation of US laws. And a joint decision by both branches of government – ​​the judiciary and the legislature. You can't just up and impeach someone when you don't like the elected president.
So far, Trump has not violated US laws.

And with Iran, things aren't so clear-cut. Sure, there are strikes on bases, blah-blah-blah, but with oil at 200, US revenues from energy sales to Europe will skyrocket. Things will get really bad in Europe, and then the MAGA will come. With production moving from Europe to the US. The US is the largest oil producer and arms manufacturer. If there's a shortage of weapons and oil on the market, where's the violation of US interests?

[Mikhail Ivanov]

Yeah, and gas will be 15 a gallon, after which the population will kick Red Chaos out of his white hut.

[VSO-396]

Quote: RESEARCHER

The red-haired maniac might even face impeachment.

It's like you live in the USA. Political scientists, damn it.
It's precisely because of Iran that he will be impeached!

[Arzoo]

They thought they were shooting rockets at the Persians, but the Persians started walking all over them.

You're seriously underestimating the whole mishpukha thing. That was the original plan, using Iran's hands, to reduce the entire Islamic Middle East to the Bronze Age.

[Mikhail Ivanov]

I'm already tired of writing here. Trump's team's goal before the talks with Xi on March 30th is to take back all the oil China was buying. And that was Venezuela and Iran. We're standing apart from our own here...

[TermNachTer]

Great news for Trump))) With gas prices rising, there's no need to go to the November 2026 elections – the results are already known)))

[abc_alex]

Quote: TermNachTER

Great news for Trump))) With gas prices rising, there's no need to go to the November 2026 elections – the results are already known)))

But also with rising oil revenues! Besides, the US has significant domestic oil production; it's not like Germany, where almost 100% of its petroleum products are imported, or Japan. Things will get sour there. And in the US, things aren't so clear-cut. With oil at 200, a new "shale boom" is possible.

[TermNachTer]

Yes, only the USA and the largest consumer, that's the catch.

[Mikhail Ivanov]

There will be no boom, there will be a second sniper.
If global prices rise, US oil producers will also raise their prices. They don't own us; everything is privately owned.

[faridg7]

Do you really think it's gasoline buyers who vote in elections there? Trump, with Iran's help, shut down traffic in the Strait of Hormuz, thereby ensuring the profitability of oil production in the US. The oilmen there (I mean the owners, not the workers) will be ready to carry him in their arms in a week, if not already.

[TermNachTer]

I have three friends who live in the US, and the price of gas is a very sensitive issue for the vast majority of them. Americans don't walk, for a variety of reasons.

[faridg7]

But they don't decide anything in elections anyway, and as for the gas price hike, what will they do? They'll either buy the more expensive stuff or walk. Just don't let them talk about the election sham—that's a theater for fools.

[KZAKVO32923]

There's no public transportation in the United States, except in a few major cities. Every American will feel the impact of rising gas prices!

[KZAKVO32923]

That's right, every American!

[faridg7]

Quote: KZAKVO32923

That's right, every American!

Every American oil field and refinery owner will feel the weight of their cats growing heavier and will vote for the culprit—Trump, while everyone on public transportation or in their own cars will complain about their own skin and vote against—it means nothing. They'll certainly be given the chance to vent—they'll be fed another Jewish list, while the average person has the memory of a goldfish—until the next big event.

[KZAKVO32923]

Oil owners are certainly powerful, but even their capital and influence won't help when Americans spend significantly more on gasoline. In the States, a car literally means LEGS. So they may be indifferent to genocide, disasters, ethnic cleansing, and any other misfortune, but when it comes to their wallets, they'll go berserk and destroy whoever caused it.

[faridg7]

Half the population there are clueless freaks, urban hipsters who can't do anything except steal from stores and shoot up, the other half are law-abiding to the core, and those who try to demolish something will simply be shot by the police or the National Guard.

[KZAKVO32923]

And they won't be given a list! They've started a whole war to cover up these pedophile acts!

[Mikhail Ivanov]

His oilmen will soon hang him themselves. Yesterday, Iran began destroying the Middle East's oil infrastructure, where vast sums of money are located—namely, the Americans'.
And gasoline is the number one price in the US, since everyone has cars, and many even have pickup trucks. Every politician there controls the price of gasoline. Biden opened up the reserves to bring the price down...

[Ivan№One]

A new wave of attacks on American military bases in the Middle East is underway.

What about aircraft carriers?
And that one here on the site, among some... specialists , there is an opinion that sinking a carrier is a piece of cake.
And something is only flying through the databases for now

[Locksmith]

And here on the site, among some... experts laughing, there is an opinion that sinking a carrier is a piece of cake.

Why sink it? The idea of ​​aircraft carriers has been around since the Vietnam War. Back then, our side proposed placing a couple of anti-aircraft missiles on the deck at the start of sorties. They were rebuffed by the authorities; the last thing we needed was to escalate the conflict to the nuclear level. This is written in the book "Experience of the Vietnam War" by DSP.
Therefore, it seems that there is no problem now to stop the flight from it, only this is US territory, with all the ensuing consequences, and there is no new idiot like McCAIN yet.

[opuonmed]

Quote: Locksmith

Therefore, it seems that there is no problem now to stop the departure from it, only this is US territory, with all the ensuing consequences, and there is no new idiot like McCAIN yet

I haven't heard such nonsense in a long time. They're bombing and destroying you, and you're like, "No, we can't hit them."

[hector]

Quote: opuonmed

I haven't heard such nonsense in a long time. They're bombing and destroying you, and you're like, "No, we can't hit them."

Not long ago, here on the site, we were fervently convinced that if you are attacked from neutral territory or neutral waters, then you should under no circumstances respond, no-no, because that would be aggression towards the one who initiated the attack.

[abc_alex]

Quote: ettore

Not long ago, here on the site, we were fervently convinced that if you are attacked from neutral territory or neutral waters, then you should under no circumstances respond, no-no, because that would be aggression towards the one who initiated the attack.

An attack on any ship, wherever it may be, is a casus belli. That is, a legal pretext for declaring war. A ship is the territory of the owner state, with corresponding legal status. I hope there's some understanding between the terms "ship" and "vessel"?
But Iran really does have a rather strange logic when choosing targets. It's kind of at war, but kind of not. For example, if I wanted to inflict irreparable and serious damage on Israel, I'd strike the nuclear center and the seawater desalination plants. And not the air force bases. Or rather, I'd strike second. Once air defenses from all over Israel have been deployed to the last desalination plants.

But no, the Iranians apparently think differently.

[hector]

Quote: abc_alex

An attack on any ship, wherever it may be, is a casus belli. That is, a legal pretext for declaring war. A ship is the territory of the owner state, with corresponding legal status. I hope there's some understanding between the terms "ship" and "vessel"?

This is what I wrote. I hope you understand what I read and are responding to it.
What does the bureaucratic terminology "ship" or "vessel" have to do with this? And is launching an attack from the "territory of the host state" not a casus belli, not a legal pretext for declaring war, but a joke, in your opinion? Shouldn't we give in to provocations, or they'll get offended?

[Locksmith]

I haven't heard such nonsense for a long time.

Nonsense = these are your statements, there is no declared war, and any attack by Iran on aircraft carriers could very well be followed by a response with special means, no need to play the fool.

[Leon68]

Your reasoning is strange. And isn't the bombing of Iran by Jews and Yankees, by any chance, an act of aggression and a pretext for war?

[Alexey northerner]

Aren't military bases state territory?

[YES UZH]

=Alexey Severyanin]Aren't military bases state territory?

This is the territory where the internal laws of the United States apply.

[voland_1]

Iran is also defending itself against America, so it has every right to strike American territory. They're not shy about hitting us. So, as the great Lenin said: sink, sink, and sink some more! In the worst case scenario, the landing deck is smashed to smithereens and the planes are doomed.

[man]

Quote from: voland_1

So, as the great Lenin said - drown, drown and drown again!!

You're mistaken, Vladimir Ilyich never said that. Those words were spoken by the great Alexander Nevsky.

[Locksmith]

The local soldiers amuse me - haven't they all studied at colleges and academies and read famous books? Or has liberalism spread here like mold under cover? Amazing!!

[VSO-396]

Quote: Locksmith

And here on the site, among some... experts laughing, there is an opinion that sinking a carrier is a piece of cake.

Why sink it? The idea of ​​aircraft carriers has been around since the Vietnam War. Back then, our side proposed placing a couple of anti-aircraft missiles on the deck at the start of sorties. They were rebuffed by the authorities; the last thing we needed was to escalate the conflict to the nuclear level. This is written in the book "Experience of the Vietnam War" by DSP.
Therefore, it seems that there is no problem now to stop the flight from it, only this is US territory, with all the ensuing consequences, and there is no new idiot like McCAIN yet.

I wonder how it was possible to put a couple of anti-aircraft missiles on the deck in the 60s, if this deck was 300 kilometers from the shore?

[Locksmith]

Quote: VSO-396

I wonder how it was possible to put a couple of anti-aircraft missiles on the deck in the 60s, if this deck was 300 kilometers from the shore?

The book described a moment when the aircraft carrier was in the S75's range in ground-to-ground mode.

[Junior Private]

It's not easy to sink an aircraft carrier. Why bother sinking it and wasting a bunch of missiles? It's easier to hit the superstructure, which immediately renders the ship useless.

[Nexcom]

There's an even cheaper way to disable an aircraft carrier: throw sanitary pads, cotton wool, and other stuff into the toilets. That's it!

and you won't have to waste missiles.

All that remains is to find someone who will do this by seeping onto the side of the tub...

[RuAbel]

Yes, I'd like to see the security forces shoot down the Fattah missiles heading for Abram. But Iran probably hopes to get off with a minimum of bloodshed and doesn't want to tweak the tiger's whiskers any further. The loss of an aircraft carrier would be a national tragedy, no worse than 9/11.

[opuonmed]

Quote from Ruabel

The loss of an aircraft carrier would be a national tragedy, no worse than 9/11.

And the destruction of the elite and statehood is not a tragedy for Iran?

[Rakitin]

Well, that's good - for the 250th anniversary of Omeriga.

[boris]

Nobody here said that sinking an aircraft carrier is easy. This is
It's very difficult. But it's possible and necessary. Or better yet, two.
Unsinkable ships do not exist.

[YES UZH]

=borys]Nobody here said that sinking an aircraft carrier is easy. This is
It's very difficult. But it's possible and necessary. Or better yet, two.
Unsinkable ships do not exist.

Who will provide target designation for a moving target?

[topol717]

Quote: Ivan№One

And here on the site, among some... experts, there is an opinion that sinking a carrier is a piece of cake.

40 years ago, I was studying. Our teachers told us that the US was experimenting with sinking an aircraft carrier. I don't remember how it all ended, but they dropped a lot on it back then. Torpedoes, missiles, and bombs. Even 10 missiles wouldn't have been enough to sink it.

[abc_alex]

Quote: Ivan№One

What about aircraft carriers?

And that's just plain weird. US ships are right there, right under our noses. Iran has all sorts of anti-ship missiles, and those are pretty impressive targets. But no, they're not hitting. There's no need to even sink an aircraft carrier—just damaging it would be painful for the US. It's entirely possible to sink the carrier's support vessels there—tankers in particular. Without them, the carrier would just bolt out of the region. The Arleigh Burkes need refueling, they're not nuclear-powered.

[smart fellow]

The Iranian anti-ship missiles have a range of 150 km, the Chinese ones, which they allegedly want to buy, have a range of 300 km, and the AUGs have a range of 700-800 km.

[KCA]

So what's a carrier strike group supposed to do 700-800 km from shore? Just sit at anchor and puff out their cheeks? That's practically the combat radius of aircraft; no one's going to burn kerosene at zero. They'll need to reserve fuel for maneuvers and landings, and it's not a given that they'll be able to carry much weaponry with a full tank.

[smart fellow]

Indeed, the F-35B Lightning II has a combat radius of approximately 830–845 kilometers (about 450 nautical miles) with internal fuel. The F/A-18E/F Super Hornet has a combat radius of approximately 722–760 km (with four bombs and drop tanks). If we're counting on bombs rather than missiles, then
JSOW (AGM-154): up to 130 km;
JDAM-ER (with wing kit): up to 70+ km.
Therefore, the Americans have deployed dozens of KC-135 Stratotanker and KC-46A Pegasus tankers to the region. Israel has also acquired several tankers. The allies will refuel both their own and enemy aircraft. The aircraft carrier USS Gerald R. Ford is equipped with tankers, which are F/A-18E/F Super Hornet multirole fighters configured with external fuel tanks and refueling units (buddy tanking).
Moreover, the Americans were able to use airfields in the Persian Gulf countries. Therefore, the Iranians damaged runways in Kuwait, Qatar, and the UAE.
In 2014, I read an article about how even F-16s flying from Turkey could strike Moscow with thermonuclear bombs. The F-16's combat radius is 295 nautical miles or 546 km on hi-lo-hi missions with four 1,000-pound (454 kg) bombs. After taking off from Incirlik Air Force Base, they refuel over the Black Sea, fly to Moscow, and after completing their mission, land at airfields in the Baltic states or several other European countries, depending on the amount of fuel remaining on board.

For strikes against Iran's interior, the Americans are currently using Tomahawks, of which there are over 600 in the region. After disabling two long-range radars and damaging runways in the Persian Gulf, the Americans are having major problems striking Iran. In fact, the current situation differs from the previous conflict because of the Jews.

[smart fellow]

They can no longer easily bypass Iranian air defenses because they can only rely on AWACS aircraft, which, due to their vulnerability, cannot fly close to Iran. According to the Iranians, their aircraft are participating in attacks on American bases in the region, whereas in the previous conflict, they hid at airbases, awaiting attack. I don't know whether the MiG-29 was shot down by an enemy F-15 or if it was an Su-35, but now they are reporting attacks by Iran, not its allies. As we recall, during the previous conflict, the Jews bombed Iran non-stop for the entire 12 days of the conflict.

[KZAKVO32923]

You'll want to live and sail even further. After one of the technical support ships was damaged, the aircraft carrier urgently sailed to the Indian Ocean.

[Mikhail Nasharashev]

this is a normal mix
If the Americans don't quickly break Iran, they will fight until the Iranians run out of missiles, or until the American troops at the bases around Iran run out.

[paul3390]

What if someone actually plants missiles on the Iranians?

[Mikhail Nasharashev]

Who, for example? We're unlikely to, we've got our hands full with the suckers ourselves, the Chinese would be afraid, they're not warriors, they're traders, and you need to have balls to launch attack missiles.
We could help with intelligence, the Americans help the losers and nothing happens, so we can too, although our capabilities in this region are unknown.

[Locksmith]

Quote: paul3390

What if someone actually plants missiles on the Iranians?

They have no problems with missile production, China and Russia have already solved the problems with delicate electronics = this is clear from the liberal vaidos that Russia has supposedly deflated and is not helping, it is clear to the goat that no one is inflating these issues and the decisions are not published in the newspaper.

[Junior Private]

Many people are itching to send missiles to the Persians. But it's not entirely clear how to implement it logistically.

[isv000]

Quote: Mikhail Nasharashev

this is a normal mix
If the Americans don't quickly break Iran, they will fight until the Iranians run out of missiles, or until the American troops at the bases around Iran run out.

We need to help the Persians with missiles. We probably have something we can dig out of our stash. We need to shake up China, otherwise we're sick of sitting by the river, waiting to see our own corpse floating by. The North Koreans will probably throw in some for testing. It's time to finish off the fascists in Izrailovka before it's too late. And Donnie will be kicked out of the BD anyway if another hundred or so bags fill up.

[Mikhail Nasharashev]

How do we need to shake up China?

[ergh081]

It's easy, just cut off oil and gas supplies from Iran and Russia. Then China will shake itself up and start buying from the US. Just kidding, right? Otherwise, it'll just sit by the river and wait for our corpses and the Persians to float past.

[isv000]

Quote: Mikhail Nasharashev

How do we need to shake up China?

... about the doorframe!

[Ivan№One]

If you shoot hard at bases in Kuwait and the UAE, you might end up somewhere wrong, and the Jews and the Yankees will be joined by other people who don't particularly like Iran anyway... Kuwait, the UAE, Bahrain, Qatar, Jordan... a long list, if I haven't forgotten anyone.
Are there US bases in the USA? I think so. So, that's a plus for the USA.

[Dart2027]

Quote: Ivan№One

If you fire hard at bases in Kuwait and the UAE, you might end up somewhere wrong, and other people will join the Jews and the Yankees.

But the fact that they provide their territory doesn’t mean participation?

[poquello]

Quote: Dart2027

Quote: Ivan№One

If you fire hard at bases in Kuwait and the UAE, you might end up somewhere wrong, and other people will join the Jews and the Yankees.

But the fact that they provide their territory doesn’t mean participation?

and now they fly at them by accident, there was no need to place bases, but when it flies on purpose, it will be a completely different story

[Dart2027]

Quote: poquello

and now they're just flying in by accident, there was no need to set up bases

Hmm.

Quote: Ivan№One

If you fire hard at bases in places like Kuwait and the UAE, you might end up somewhere wrong.

[poquello]

Quote: Dart2027

Quote: poquello

and now they're just flying in by accident, there was no need to set up bases

Hmm.

Quote: Ivan№One

If you fire hard at bases in places like Kuwait and the UAE, you might end up somewhere wrong.

Quote: poquello

and how accurately will it fly?

Everything will go where it is specifically painful for this country.

[Dart2027]

Quote: poquello

Everything will go where it is specifically painful for this country.

The question is who will be hurt more.

[poquello]

Quote: Dart2027

Quote: poquello

Everything will go where it is specifically painful for this country.

The question is who will be hurt more.

No, they understand that Iran is at war with the US and Israel, so they won't interfere unless the US kicks them out.

[Dart2027]

Quote: poquello

They won't go there unless the US kicks them in the ass.

Most likely. But if they do try, then...

[know]

If you fire hard at bases in Kuwait and the UAE, you might end up somewhere wrong, and the Jews and the Yankees will be joined by other people who don't particularly like Iran anyway... Kuwait, the UAE, Bahrain, Qatar, Jordan

They're already writing that Iran didn't cause significant damage to US bases, but it did anger all its neighbors, so targeting concrete runways isn't the best tactic. The damage to the enemy is negligible, and now Sunnis dislike Iran even more.

[poquello]

Quote: vet

They're already writing that Iran didn't cause significant damage to US bases, but it did anger all its neighbors, so targeting concrete runways isn't the best tactic. The damage to the enemy is negligible, and now Sunnis dislike Iran even more.

This is American propaganda.

[Dart2027]

Quote: vet

but all the neighbors were very angry

And they didn't make him angry?

[Shumi2010]

No, the local Arabs are unlikely to go against the Persians, because then everyone in BV will be screwed[media=https://www.globalchess.ru]

[Kornodo]

To those who downvoted this particular message... What's wrong with it?
The man didn't take sides, but emphasized what could happen if...
Minusators - where is your logic???

[Grancer81]

"Enemies are not counted, enemies are beaten!" A.V. Suvorov.

[KZAKVO32923]

In all the countries listed above, only the top brass is bought by the Zionists; the people in these countries are ready to devour the Zionist regime. So, give them a reason, and they'll sweep away all these faggot sheikhs.

[Mikhail Ivanov]

Iran has a very extensive missile arsenal, and a wide variety of them. It remains to be seen who will run out of missiles first, especially for air defense...

[Intelligence]

Are you comparing a sanctioned country with a country with the largest military budget of $962 billion per year? However...

[Mikhail Ivanov]

There is another sanctioned country, the DPRK. Somehow, the mattresses didn’t want to go there.
Iran is certainly weaker, but it will drink Trump's blood...

[Patriot is listening]

Because North Korea is a destitute and impoverished country with a population living on humanitarian aid, slave labor, and Chinese subsidies. They are living proof that communism is stillborn. The Americans will not destroy this museum.

[poquello]

Quote: Patriot is listening

Because North Korea is a poor and destitute country.

This is American propaganda,
The DPRK produces high-quality cosmetics, building materials, medicines, and optical products.

[Patriot is listening]

Are you confusing it with its southern neighbor? Or is this some kind of joke? Otherwise, a country with the Tver region's budget won't be able to achieve miracles.

[poquello]

Quote: Patriot is listening

Are you confusing it with its southern neighbor? Or is this some kind of joke? Otherwise, a country with the Tver region's budget won't be able to achieve miracles.

Vladivostok 24th year, VDNKh DPRK – cosmetics, clothing, building materials, furniture, tableware, musical instruments. A major supplier of ginseng-based medicines and cosmetics.

[Patriot is listening]

And how much of this is there? And how much did they sell, or did they just come to show what they can do in theory?

[poquello]

Quote: Patriot is listening

And how much of this is there? And how much did they sell, or did they just come to show what they can do in theory?

There are no direct calculations, 34 million USD in 24 from the Russian Federation and 167 million USD for cosmetics in China in 23

[Patriot is listening]

This is pennies even by the standards of the poorest regions of Russia

[poquello]

Quote: Patriot is listening

This is pennies even by the standards of the poorest regions of Russia

So do you want "pennies" or "in theory"?

[Patriot is listening]

Well, in your theory, actually, even the DPRK earned pennies at the level of the city budget of a small urban-type settlement

[poquello]

Quote: Patriot is listening

Well, in your theory, actually, even the DPRK earned pennies at the level of the city budget of a small urban-type settlement

Do you get paid for your lines?

[Patriot is listening]

And you for stupid questions?

[poquello]

Quote: poquello

Quote: Patriot is listening

Well, in your theory, actually, even the DPRK earned pennies at the level of the city budget of a small urban-type settlement

Do you get paid for your lines?

A normal question about the nonsense about urban development and general activity in the VO, well, it's just verbal diarrhea, so it inspired

[Grancer81]

A poor and destitute country makes missiles, the launch of which shakes all of Japan and South Korea, along with the Americans who are there.

[Patriot is listening]

Even Germany knew how to make missiles like that during the war, the V-2. And who cares how it's phrased? It's funny to read such words, as if they were lifted from Soviet newspapers.

[Grancer81]

The Japanese are shaking when missiles fly out of North Korea. And you, as I understand it, are a top-notch expert on missile weapons, and North Korean missiles in particular?
How long have you been out of Pyongyang?
Your words about the DPRK are taken from the propaganda of American newspapers and nothing more.

[dnestr74]

Why is she poor and destitute? As a result of what? You fucking patriot, where are you from?

[Patriot is listening]

Well, it's poor and destitute because communists rule it. Then, when they were starting to recover from the famine of the 90s, they decided to develop a nuclear weapon and were hit with sanctions, which Russia supported. Instead of implementing market reforms and negotiating with the US like Vietnam and China, they decided to play strong and independent. That's all.

[Grancer81]

And how many days ago did your Excellency arrive from Pyongyang?

[Patriot is listening]

So, we don't recognize the famine of the 90s now?

[Grancer81]

I didn’t ask about hunger, I asked how long ago your Excellency returned from Pyongyang?

[Patriot is listening]

When will North Korea start accepting tourists like normal countries, and not just taking them to certain places at once?

[Grancer81]

So, your honor can repeat propaganda, but if he's going to go, he should hide? How does the propaganda of the fascist West differ from that of the DPRK?

[Patriot is listening]

Why go there if the most I'll see is the local Berezki shops?

[Grancer81]

Well, I haven't arrived yet, but I've already seen it. Through the eyes of US propaganda.

[poquello]

Quote: Patriot is listening

Well, she is poor and destitute because the communists rule them.

You have a distorted concept of communism. Communism is minus freedom and plus a commune, and it has no direct relation to the market.

[Patriot is listening]

Tell me, which countries have communists achieved success in terms of living standards? China and Vietnam negotiated with the US and then abandoned their planned economies.

[poquello]

Quote: Patriot is listening

China and Vietnam reached an agreement with the US and subsequently abandoned their planned economy.

No one has excommunicated the CPC and the CPV from governing the country, )))))))))) The 15th Five-Year Development Plan of China is defined for the period from 2026 to 2030.

[Patriot is listening]

By this logic, United Russia is the Communist Party of the Soviet Union, since everyone in it was a Komsomol or party member. And they rule the country. Or does that not count?

[poquello]

Quote: Patriot is listening

With this logic

Logic has nothing to do with it, the Chinese have a well-established guiding and directing role for the CPC

[voland_1]

And how many of these billions are stolen?

[Patriot is listening]

I sometimes want to send the Iranians a link to this site, at least from here they can see how good they are. They're a super-poor country with a drought and a collapsing currency, so at least they'd be happy with this.

[poquello]

Quote: Patriot is listening

Sometimes I want to send the Iranians a link to this site, at least from here they can find out how good they are.

Iraq is right there, don't bother

[KZAKVO32923]

Is there a problem with texts in Hasbara?

[KZAKVO32923]

I completely agree with you, after the 12-day war the Zionists did not restore all their reserves, the Americans spent a lot on Ukrainians, so soon the whining and crying of the Zionist Yaroslavna to the red-haired clown will begin again - "Help and save us from Iranian ballistics"

[kventinasd]

Iran unveils hypersonic Fattah missiles

It would be great to hit an American aircraft with something similar, but it's a shame Iran doesn't have hypersonic anti-ship missiles. A furious Trump would be carried off his feet by his own Republicans, not to mention the Democrats.

[Mikhail Ivanov]

Even without the aircraft carrier, there are already significant losses there...

[kventinasd]

Quote: Mikhail-Ivanov

Even without the aircraft carrier, there are already significant losses there...

No, it is precisely the sunken aircraft that can put the arrogant red-haired idiot and his crazy cur, Netanyahu, in their place.

[KZAKVO32923]

Here, some political scientists believe that this was a deliberate attack on a children's school, especially on girls, as a kind of ritual sacrifice according to Zionist beliefs.

[Andy_nsk]

I wish I could hit an American aircraft.

How to provide target acquisition on a moving target?

[kventinasd]

Quote from Andy_nsk

How to provide target acquisition on a moving target?

How do you think, for example, Russian Zircon is induced?

[Andy_nsk]

How do you think, for example, Russian Zircon is induced?

It's about the same—nothing. I haven't come across a single credible mention of a Zircon hitting a moving target.

[kventinasd]

Quote from Andy_nsk

I haven't met

Just because you haven't encountered something doesn't mean it doesn't exist. The Zirkon is guided in much the same way as the Granit, Oniks, Kalibr anti-ship missiles, and other missiles, only with a more advanced seeker. Initial target designation of a moving or stationary object is achieved via satellite systems and the INS (flight mission), after which the missile's seeker locks on to the target. AWACS aircraft are completely unnecessary here.

[Andy_nsk]

We don't have a satellite system that provides real-time targeting guidance. And it's completely unclear how the seeker can work if the missile is encased in a plasma cocoon. It defies the laws of physics. The other missiles you mentioned aren't hypersonic.

[kventinasd]

Quote from Andy_nsk

This contradicts the laws of physics.

If you don't understand something, that's your problem.
Check out this short overview of what works in Zircon and how. It also mentions plasma.

[Andy_nsk]

To summarize the hour-and-a-half film, it can be said that radar operation at hypersonic speeds is impossible due to the plasma cocoon. Iran (like us) lacks a satellite guidance system. How will Iran guide its "hypersonic" missiles to US aircraft carriers hundreds of kilometers from the launch site?

[kventinasd]

Quote from Andy_nsk

that the operation of a radar head at hypersonic speed is impossible due to the plasma cocoon.

And it doesn't need that. The seeker activates in the final phase, where hypersonics are no longer needed. However, even in final attack mode, it's impossible to shoot down the missile. The enemy simply doesn't have such countermeasures because the radars simply don't have time to lock onto the target. It's like shooting sparrows with a cannon.

How will Iran target its "hypersonic" missiles at US aircraft carriers hundreds of kilometers from the launch point?

According to the latest news, China has provided Iran with a radar and about 500 satellites of its space group for tracking and targeting enemy targets.

[Andy_nsk]

China has provided Iran with a radar and about 500 satellites from its space constellation to track and target enemy targets.

Great news! Now Iran will sink the entire US fleet! Let's wait and see who goes down first!

[Lako]

There was information that Netanyahu's plane had departed Tel Aviv. It looks like the family and friends of the main warmonger are getting the hell out of the Promised Land.

[Mikhail Nasharashev]

They have a homeland where they feed people better.

[Romeo]

Well, then, we need to strike the aircraft carrier, as a symbol of American power. I think that after such a strike, which would cause massive casualties, the war would end.

[drags33]

Closing the Strait of Hormuz is Iran's most important weapon. Not long ago, during military exercises, Iran closed the strait for ONE HOUR (!!!) – a negative impact spread throughout global trade... A few days or weeks of closure could cause a collapse of global trade... These are very sensitive actions by Iran.

[Engineer]

We had the Suez Canal blocked a couple of years ago, if you remember. Physically, actually. Did global trade collapse or what? They'll find a way around it... it'll take longer, be more expensive, and there'll be a lot of howling about how they can't do it and how the black caviar layer has reached critical levels, but no matter—they'll survive.

[drags33]

I'm embarrassed to ask: who is this "We"? I'm not citing my personal opinion on the difficulties in global trade, but rather published data.

[Engineer]

People are from planet Earth. And you are from somewhere else?
I cited a real-life example where the same "published data" predicted the collapse of the entire global economy. So, not all data published online should be trusted.

[cpls22]

Quote: Engineer

They'll get around it... it will take longer and be more expensive.

The strait blocks the exit from the gulf, i.e., from the pocket. How can it be bypassed? By land it would be much longer and more expensive, or an oil pipeline would be needed. If one doesn't exist yet, it will be. strongly longer and more expensive.

[Patriot is listening]

The last time Iran did this, they got a hard time.

[nikvp]

A great success for the Iranians would be to sink an American warship.

[Ivan F]

The Gulf monarchies are already against Iran. Trump is a sly man, he played the situation well. The only question is: will Iran be quickly and immediately demolished or slowly strangled?

[2 Level Advisor]

I don't get it... Iran has caught up with us in hypersonic speed? How so... Well, let's see how it's used.

[Murzik]

This is from the same series as "Pakistan created its own nuclear weapons"

[Patriot is listening]

What's called hypersonic in Russia is something almost everyone is interested in. A simple ballistic missile is quite hypersonic.

[Vlad Gor]

Closing the Strait of Hormuz to tankers will have a negative impact on China. This raises an interesting question regarding China. Will China sit, wait, and remain silent, thereby siding with the US and the Jews, or will it send its navy to unblock the Strait of Hormuz? Statements without action have no effect on the US and the Jews.

[Andy_nsk]

Closing the Strait of Hormuz for tankers will hit China.

Our oil will go to China at a reasonable price, not at the breaking-even point. Closing the strait is a dream come true for our oil industry.

[Foggy Dew]

Red's doomed. As soon as gas prices start creeping up in the US.

[gribanov.c]

What's their CEP and warhead weight? What's the point without a nuclear warhead?

[Andrei Nikolaevich]

The US is sticking its nose in everywhere. What's wrong with Iran? An independent and self-sufficient state. Do they want Iran to become a gateway for powerful countries again, like it was under the royal dynasty? And Israel is right there, scurrying around. At worst, the US will hide its battered face and run away. And Israel will be left alone to face the entire Arab world. I don't think the Arabs will "pray to the Jews." They'll remember everything. Israel, like the forelocked ones, has never had a peaceful life.
But the most cunning in all these conflicts are the Chinese. Comrade Xi has hidden his eyes, adopted a neutral gaze, and is observing the outcome. And then, he will decide which side to take and for what benefit.

[Patriot is listening]

It's so funny to read this: Iran has managed to befriend Israel in the entire Arab world. Everyone despises Iran and has no ally in the region. Iran itself is a poor country, living by Sharia law and jihad against everyone. They've literally gotten on everyone's nerves in the region. I've always been amazed by how the USSR allowed Pol Pot to emerge and yet still supported him. This story is repeating itself again, when we support a country simply because they gave the Americans the finger.

[WIS]

Quote: Patriot is listening

Everyone despises Iran and there is not a single ally in the region.

Excuse me, but are there many free countries there that have their own opinions and are not under pressure from the States?
I cannot judge bare facts without evidence.

[Patriot is listening]

Let's skip this low-grade propaganda about servants and slaves. Some people are convinced that North Korea, which lives on Chinese subsidies and UN humanitarian aid, is independent. The bare fact is that those Arabs who are friends with the US live well, or relatively well, while those who try to conflict with it live on $100 a month.

[WIS]

“To be at enmity with America is dangerous, but to be friends with her is deadly.” (c)

[Patriot is listening]

Well, the Saudis live like sheikhs, and the Iranians live in drought. It's telling.

[WIS]

Quote: Patriot is listening

Iranians are living in drought.

And?
This year in our city we have snowdrifts more than three or even four meters high along the road, forming a wall for tens of meters.
Do you think the mayor's office cares?
Goodnight

[Patriot is listening]

The drought comes with an average salary of 15 rubles and a falling currency. So far, there are no problems in Russia, thank God.

[WIS]

Quote: Patriot is listening

While There are no problems in Russia, thank God.

For now, in Russia, people like me are witnessing a never-ending milestone.
Thank you for at least not adding any "sweets" to my future sleep in my seventh decade...

Dark You - in some regions today, wages are already not enough to pay for housing and communal services...

[Patriot is listening]

Russia has problems, but they're theoretically solvable. As long as people have money for bread, everything will be fine, in theory.

[Andrei Nikolaevich]

Patriot listening (Yolka). You have the logic of the Leningrad "opposition" in the kitchen. I'm talking about those who are capable of expressing their "patriotic" opinions—to an empty refrigerator. May the residents of our cultural capital forgive me.

[Nikolay A. Shadov]

Judging by the abundance of negatively marked expression in his comments, does the sir have something personal against the Iranians?

[Patriot is listening]

Well, I have an intolerance for countries ruled by Sharia, jihad, Islamic patrols, and other bad things. It's strange that our propaganda makes them out to be the good guys. We fought the same kind of people not far from there about 10 years ago.

[Nikolay A. Shadov]

Our propaganda has always been guided by the principle "the enemy of my enemy..." And there's nothing wrong with that, because in geopolitics, survival is impossible any other way. Our adversaries are doing the same, and on an even larger scale. And, by the way, they started much earlier.
As for Sharia laws in those countries where they have been followed historically and without major interruptions, it is not for us, representatives of a secular state with a fundamentally different worldview, to judge their positive or negative character.
This, of course, does not apply to all sorts of new projects of Great Caliphates like the Chechen Republic of Ichkeria or ISIS.

[Patriot is listening]

There's no such thing as good Sharia, frankly speaking. The laws themselves are clearly written to kill infidels and suppress dissent.

[Grancer81]

And how many infidels did the Iranians kill?

[Patriot is listening]

It is precisely because she is harassed by sanctions and economic collapse that she sits and snaps at the most

[Grancer81]

That's why I repeat the question...And how many infidels did the Iranians kill?

[Patriot is listening]

If a psychopath who screams that he wants to stab you and takes away your knife, will he become good?

[Grancer81]

I repeat the question... How many infidels did the Iranians kill? Please give me the full list.

[Grancer81]

This is not your country to tell you what to live with and how to live there.

[poquello]

Quote: Patriot is listening

Well, I have an intolerance for countries ruled by Sharia, jihad, Islamic patrols, and other bad things. It's strange that our propaganda makes them out to be the good guys.

Are expired drug addicts, Nazis, and TCC patrols better?

[Patriot is listening]

To me, they're all birds of a feather. The question is, why do local patriots view the religious fanatics we fought against not long ago as superior to the nationalist fanatics we're fighting now?

[WIS]

Quote: Patriot is listening

For me they are all birds of a feather.

You express yourself very vividly, as do your thoughts. Half a century (recently) ago, I could probably have stood shoulder to shoulder with you.

[poquello]

Quote: Patriot is listening

religious fanatics with whom we fought not long ago

Catholics?

[smart fellow]

This is simply a Ukrainian or Jewish patriot. There are many Jews and Ukrainians on this site who are disguised as their own.

[Patriot is listening]

And you, as I understand it, are an Islamic patriot? Why don't you go to Afghanistan or Iran?

[KCA]

Persians live in Iran and they are not Arabs, how the Arab world will react is unknown

[opuonmed]

I hope the target was chosen correctly and the US augs won't get bored.

[WIN969]

I've long suspected, based on certain strange movements, that Russia is already conducting behind-the-scenes negotiations with the Iranian opposition, just as it did during the Syrian conflict. That's why Putin doesn't speak out in Iran's defense, but limits himself to peaceful statements and offers of mediation.

[Eug]

So, they'll be seizing Russian oil tankers. And as for cover... things aren't so great.

[Mikhail3]

So far, nothing is clear. All parties to the conflict are lying, pursuing their own agendas. Information from independent (at least partially) sources must accumulate.

[Totor5]

The Anglo-Saxons are hitting us with Flamingos and Atacamas, but we can hit their fleet with the Hazel... ie... the Al Fatih Hazel. They say it was originally invented to destroy naval groups.

[snow mountain]

Iran unveils hypersonic Fattah missiles

Israel must be destroyed!

[Patriot is listening]

While Israel has broken the hands of everyone who tried to do this

[Nikolay A. Shadov]

Correction: Israel with US assistance. The recent Israeli-Iranian conflict clearly demonstrated that Tel Aviv cannot survive without the active participation of the US.
In the same vein, but from a more distant history. In the book "Forgotten Wars of the USSR" (a rather poor source, but one that offers some interesting facts based on documents and eyewitness accounts), in the section on the Yom Kippur War, I read that, according to some sources, the Americans, when things were going badly for their protégés, warned the leadership of the anti-Israeli coalition that they would not tolerate "defeat by American weapons." After which, said leadership made a series of strange strategic decisions that allowed the Jewish gentlemen to quickly make up for lost time.

[Patriot is listening]

Are there any facts, and not just rumors, myths, and so on? The facts are simple: Israel exists peacefully in the Middle East, and the US is just as peacefully exerting its influence.

[Nikolay A. Shadov]

Facts are always welcome.
Regarding the recent Iran-Israel conflict. Did the US and NATO navies help repel Iranian strikes on Israel? They did (that's a fact). Did the US directly intervene in the conflict, striking Iranian military-industrial facilities and research centers? They did (also a fact). Now, a little logic. Would the Jews have resorted to their help, given the opportunity to win on their own and thus gain all the political laurels? I think the question is rhetorical.
The Yom Kippur War. Were the anti-Israeli coalition's actions successful in the first days of the conflict? More than (a fact). Three days after the conflict began, the Americans opened that very airlift, supplying Israel with everything it needed, including aircraft (thanks to Kissinger)? Yes, that's a fact. Did the Americans have the ability to increase pressure on the participating countries (both military and economic)? They did (a fact). Kissinger, in an interview with the Israeli newspaper Ma'aria, said that they couldn't allow the fact that "Soviet weapons would be perceived in the international arena as higher quality due to the successes of the Egyptian army"? He did (a fact). Did Egypt quickly make concessions during the negotiation process? Absolutely. That's also a fact. So, Israel's peaceful existence in the Middle East is definitely not a fact. Without the United States, it would certainly not have been peaceful. And it's not guaranteed that there would have been any peace at all.

[Patriot is listening]

"Would the Jews have resorted to their help, given the opportunity to win on their own and thus gain all the political laurels? I think the question is rhetorical." You'll excuse me, of course, but this argument can also be applied to recent events, where Korean troops are involved and so on. Or does that not count?

[Nikolay A. Shadov]

Ah, so the lord has nothing to say about the rest of what I wrote? Well, lord, there's hope for him.
As for the thesis about Korean troops... Is Messire seriously comparing the scale and "impact" of North Korea's intervention in our conflict and the US's in the Iranian-Israeli one?

[Patriot is listening]

Why respond to the rest if your words are utterly hypocritical? Why not? The DPRK provided military support, the most valuable of all. Or is there a gradation here, what can be said doesn't count?

[Nemchinov Vl]

Quote: Nikolay A. Shadov

...And regarding the thesis about Korean troops... Is Messire seriously comparing the scale and "impact" of North Korea's intervention in our conflict and the US's in the Iranian-Israeli one?

good!!

[Patriot is listening]

His answer sounds like your argument isn't an argument because it doesn't count. This isn't clever, it's just kindergarten.

[snow mountain]

Quote: nikvp

A great success for the Iranians would be the sinking of an American warship.

It would be just a song!

[Yuri Khuchev]

Well done guys, the strait should have been blocked long ago.

[Sergey1984]

Good luck to the Iranians! Well done!

[Rusich-Izhora]

I'd like to believe that our Commander-in-Chief gave the order to transmit information from our satellites to Iran and assist with targeting. A debt must be repaid. Well, it's not only Americans who are given the ability to smile sweetly with a club behind their back and a cobblestone in their pocket.

[Hariton laptev]

If the Persians close the strait and the oil goes crazy, red-haired Doni will testify in his friend's case.

[Hariton laptev]

The person who downvoted, please refute this or give a normal comment.

[oleg_627]

Germany and England are planning to help Israel, but where are the SCO countries? BRICS? Where does Iran belong? Or will they be back in the UN? Tomorrow, the redhead will invade Cuba and issue another protest note. It's a shame there's no leader like Stalin, just an elite of oligarchs and bankers.

[Scientist_]

Quote: Patriot is listening

Because the DPRK is a poor and impoverished country with a population living on humanitarian aid, slave labor, and subsidies from China.

Here's a photo from Pyongyang.

[sir Garry]

The Iranians should have done this a week ago... Sigh!

[sir Garry]

Quote from Scientist

Here's a photo from Pyongyang.

Beautiful! Now, can I get some photos from areas 15 km outside of Pyongyang? I have great respect for our sisterly DPRK, but there's no need to embellish things!

[Sotskiy]

Quote: sirGarry

Now, can we get some photos from areas 15 km from Pyongyang?

Why don't you want to search, for example, for photos of areas 15 km from any regional center in the Russian Federation?
And at the same time, compare the resource base of both countries and, so to speak, in "contrast", maybe you will understand why people sympathize with the North Koreans.

[sir Garry]

Don't avoid answering the question! The question was about the quality of life in the DPRK compared to their capital.

[Sotskiy]

Quote: sirGarry

Don't avoid answering the question!

Did I miss something and there was a question?

The issue was discussed about the quality of life in the DPRK compared to their capital.

.
It's strange, because I thought that everyone here is rushing to Moscow and St. Petersburg to earn money with the goal of staying there permanently, probably because the quality of life in the regions is the same as in Moscow.

[sir Garry]

Quote: drags33

A few days or weeks of strait closure could cause a collapse in global trade.

Don't exaggerate! This will be a short-term rise in futures prices, nothing more. Oil traders are closely monitoring developments and are taking "compensatory" measures in advance—rerouting flows, selecting new and existing suppliers, increasing pipeline throughput, etc.

[Banner]

It's not really clear why they announce all this in advance, just strike and that's it, by any means necessary, without these announcements we'll do this, that, and how we'll strike.... Also, let's post a schedule of the strikes and what, how much and where it will fly... It's really hard to understand these announcements, what's the point of all this?

[sir Garry]

Quote: Sovetskiy

It's strange, but I thought so.

You still don't understand the question, and it wasn't asked to you. Keep thinking! It's helpful. Good luck!

[faridg7]

Quote: KZAKVO32923

There's no public transportation in the United States, except in a few major cities. Every American will feel the impact of rising gas prices!

[Barbian]

Iran is asking for it. It could be driven back to the Middle Ages – with carpet strikes from the air force destroying LNG and oil plants, terminals, and ports.
The US and Israel don't do this, but if, for example, Qatar or the Saudis feel unwell, they will launch air strikes. The skies over Iran are now free to fly, whoever wants to.