Military Review

On citizenship and not only

18
Daily news optimism is not added. The state of industry, medicine, education, culture, can not be called beautiful. The state governance system is inherent: cronyism, corruption, unwillingness to take responsibility for decision-making. Budget funds are spent inefficiently, without bringing benefits to people and the country. But blaming the power for all sins is not entirely correct. Our society is also not perfect. Drunkenness, drug addiction, crime - this is an incomplete list of problems. Is it possible for the citizens of Russia to change the situation in the country for the better? What is the unifying force able to influence the state of affairs?




Russia is multi-confessional, with a different lifestyle, diverse culture. The only thing that unites us is the country and citizenship. But do we value this title? Is a person calling to unrest, stealing from children and old people, betraying his homeland worthy of being a citizen of a great country? And who better than the citizens themselves will be able to determine whether a person is worthy of this title or not?

The proposal is as follows. Introduce the concept- Russian citizen! One title is given at birth and written with a small letter, a citizen of Russia. The second conscience and is written with a capital letter, a citizen of Russia. What are the differences between these concepts? A Russian citizen by birth has certain rights and obligations enshrined in the country's constitution.

Now there is no difference between a person making a feasible contribution to the development of Russia and a person, let's say softer, indifferent to the fate of his homeland. They have the same social guarantees, they have equal rights. Is it possible to put a person in a certain framework of behavior that would allow him to live honestly, in harmony with his conscience?

What qualities should a person have in order to correspond to the title - Citizen of Russia? Do not break the law, pay taxes, respect your country and people living in it. The overwhelming majority of the country still lives. What other difference should there be between a citizen by birth and a citizen by conscience? A citizen of conscience, as making the greatest contribution to the development of Russia, owes part of the national wealth.

What is the wealth of the country? One liter of drinking water costs 5-10 rubles. Lake Baikal may well be the provision of our currency. In addition to water, forests, agricultural land, our country is rich in mineral resources. All this is a component of natural capital. Russia helps its citizens, and people work for the good of the country.

A bank account is opened in the name of each Citizen. A strictly fixed amount of money is transferred to this account. All citizens have equal amounts. This money is inviolable. But the interest from this amount, which is charged after a certain period of time, can be spent. For what purpose? Home purchase, medical services, education, possibly, payment of pensions. By adjusting the level of interest, you can stimulate the birth rate, the development of hard-to-reach areas of the North and the Far East, increasing the prestige of certain professions, and so on. Another plus
This is the exception of intermediaries. Money goes to the accounts of citizens, bypassing the army of distributors of budget funds. What is not the fight against corruption?

Most of our citizens respect their country, but are skeptical about the state system of governance. A simple example is paying taxes. Remember the tax amnesty. Did she give a tangible result? And our national currency? The confidence of citizens in the Russian ruble can be judged by the crisis moments in the economy. In a critical situation begins buying up foreign currency, gold. Over the past two decades, how many times has our money depreciated? Thus, the introduction of the Citizen-Resource Capital System will help restore confidence in the state and our
currency?

Who will determine whether a person is worthy of the title Citizen or not? At first, the title will be given automatically, but after a trial period during which a person must not violate the law, pay taxes, be a good citizen. Subsequently, it is possible to create a Board of Citizens, which will determine whether a person is worthy to carry this high rank and apply for resource capital. In turn, the majority of citizens should take turns.

Thus, there will be an involvement of the majority of the population in the public life of the country. Such a public organization has the right to withdraw the Citizenship and freeze the bank account of any person in the state, regardless of the positions and titles, if it considers the circumstances serious. Perhaps it will be a real civil society, where everyone is equal before the law.

But no one is immune from mistakes in life. The person who has lost the title of Citizen, remains a Russian, with the rights and obligations guaranteed by the country's constitution. And it depends only on him, he will return his citizenship through a probationary period, during which he has no right to work in the public service.

This is not a call to love your country for money. But agree that the resources of the country should work for its citizens. What tremendous opportunities are opening up for Russia. I want to believe that our country and people will live with dignity, as befits Great Russia and its great people !!!
Author:
18 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must to register.

I have an account? Sign in

  1. UFO
    UFO 13 May 2013 06: 49 New
    +8
    The concept - "Russians", after the "not quite sober" Yeltsin acquired a sarcastic sound. And citizenship? Until they cease to trade in wholesale and retail (hence the wait for a long time!), Then it will not cause the same pride as in its time - "citizen of the USSR!" request
    1. donchepano
      donchepano 13 May 2013 08: 57 New
      +3
      Quote: UFO
      ... And citizenship? Until they cease to trade in wholesale and retail (hence the wait for a long time!), Then it will not cause the same pride as in its time - "citizen of the USSR!"


      Something the author in the article is all about bills, money and selling.
      There is no unifying idea in Russia that would suit ordinary people. Down with oligarchism and oligarchs from Russia!
    2. andrejwz
      andrejwz 13 May 2013 09: 28 New
      +3
      Quote: UFO
      And citizenship? Until they cease to trade in wholesale and retail (hence the wait for a long time!), Then it will not cause the same pride as in its time - "citizen of the USSR!"

      I agree.
      It is not necessary to invent a new "Citizenship" with a capital letter, but to return the original meaning to the title of citizen. So that the deprivation of this title meant the civil death of a person (deprivation (deprivation forever) of the right to elect and be elected, to hold certain positions, etc.). And here, even if you trade your Motherland, even if you lay down bones for it, both will become citizens.
      1. afire
        afire 13 May 2013 10: 58 New
        +6
        words ... many words ... different ... stupid ... as always ...
        There is no essence, no root, no connecting, no unifying idea (not about space with science), but about everyone’s inner world in Russia.
        What unites everyone? thirst to live, live high quality, live not in shit. Have hope tomorrow. What needs to be done?
        1) Fundamentally change the education of youth! To give a little person not universal values, but to instill a love for the Motherland, through this love comes the purity of thought.
        2) Adopt a legislative ban on any propaganda of anti-Russian intentions and severely punish it.
        3) Are you stealing? - ok, the bracelet is on the leg and in jail, but not to sit, but to fuck ... be, and for any concealment of theft - a similar punishment!
        4) Development of Agriculture, the country must feed itself.
        5) Do not rely on anyone, nor on the Criminal Code, nor on the utilities, nor on anyone! Get up, gather everyone at least in the house, unite, repair your house on your own! After that, each of you will protect your work, protect your property and not spoil - one of the little points of those things that we should all do together, but we live separately and always hope for someone, as if we have no hands.
        These points concern any life activity in the country and in any of its spheres. If a person does not respect himself and others (not educated), then nothing can be achieved.
        What to do now? After all, the proposed paragraphs relate again to the future.
        And if we do not begin to implement these points now, then we have no future.
        And as we will call ourselves - with a capital letter or a capital letter - finally do not care
  2. fenix57
    fenix57 13 May 2013 07: 02 New
    +5
    "Who will determine, a person is worthy of the title of Citizen ... "-that's a question of questions. It will depend on this "who will determine" who will become Citizen ..
    1. Ivan.
      Ivan. 13 May 2013 11: 42 New
      +1
      Here it is. Now the majority claims that the state does not fulfill its obligations (does not protect against various threats, robs, ignores ...) and in spite of the fact that we consider our country to be shy about the state. The whole question is who will determine who will decide who will guide the development of the country. Voting, elections, and indeed none of the past and present structures did not allow to build a society in which everyone is equally valuable and does not infringe on others.
  3. Captain Vrungel
    Captain Vrungel 13 May 2013 07: 06 New
    +6
    All good undertakings are safely ruined if an official should be present there and, moreover, to determine and decide something.
  4. Atlon
    Atlon 13 May 2013 07: 09 New
    +7
    Utopia and enthusiastic fanaticism, to say the least - nonsense. Forgive the author ...
    1. djon3volta
      djon3volta 13 May 2013 08: 18 New
      0
      Quote: Atlon
      Utopia and enthusiastic fanaticism, to be more precise - nonsense.

      Yes, no, the fact is that to put it into practice it is possible only if you become president))) and even that won’t work, Russia is no longer behind the Iron Curtain, it won’t do much, dissatisfied again will appear.
      1. Atlon
        Atlon 13 May 2013 09: 00 New
        +4
        Quote: djon3volta
        Yes, no, the fact is that to put it into practice it is possible only if you become president))) and even that won’t work, Russia is no longer behind the Iron Curtain, it won’t do much, dissatisfied again will appear.

        Yesterday I watched in the news Putin's "spread" of the government. I thought: and how to cope alone with idlers and saboteurs? How ?! You can't repress, you can't shoot ... Dismiss, and who will remain? And the dismissal of the apparatus will lead to its overflow (apparatus) into the camp of the opposition (Kasyanov as an example), and by and large the entire vertical must be dismissed, with rare exceptions. Where will they go? Earlier to the Kolyma, and now to the Swamp! And how to be? I do not envy the president ... I wish him health, wisdom, patience and strength!
        1. baltika-18
          baltika-18 13 May 2013 09: 21 New
          +1
          Quote: Atlon
          Yesterday I watched in the news Putin's "spread" of the government

          And what would the whole nation know about this specially invited journalists.
          All this for television, a show for suckers.
          Quote: Atlon
          Dismiss, and who will?

          There is no special meaning in changing individual individuals. The system remains unchanged.
          While this system built by Putin will work, there will be no order in the country. This system was good in 2000-2004, but it has already outlived itself, it needs to be changed. But it seems they are not going to .....
          1. Atlon
            Atlon 13 May 2013 10: 47 New
            0
            Quote: baltika-18
            This system was good in 2000-2004, but it has already outlived itself, it needs to be changed. But it seems they are not going to .....

            Please explain:
            1. Change for what?
            2. Change to whom?
            3. WHAT system will restore order?
            1. elenasvetlova
              elenasvetlova 13 May 2013 11: 08 New
              +1
              and not the system, it’s the matter, but in all of us, we as individual individuals, each for himself, in this situation no system will help
              1. afire
                afire 13 May 2013 12: 10 New
                +1
                look at ourselves, for example, in the metro there is a young monster, and in front of him is a woman, or an adult woman is sitting and reading a newspaper, and in front of him is a woman, a girl, a grandmother. What we are talking about???
                All yo ... t became business, there’s no one to spit on, they make a hell out of themselves, they have never done anything useful in life. All to themselves, grabbing, grabbing, people of money.
        2. matross
          matross 13 May 2013 12: 28 New
          0
          Quote: Atlon
          Here is how ?! You cannot repress

          What do you mean by "repress"? Plant? Why can't the president put a high-level thief in prison? Law? Public opinion? No and no! The vicious practice of mutual responsibility - "we do not surrender our own" - stems from the fear of suffering, in one way or another, from the exposure of the "repressed"!
          1. Atlon
            Atlon 13 May 2013 17: 47 New
            0
            Quote: matRoss
            Do you think of the concept of "repressing"? Plant? Why can't the president put a high-level thief in prison? Law? Public opinion? No and no! The vicious practice of mutual responsibility interferes - "we don't give up our own"

            Nonsense ... And who told you that this official is a thief? Did you carry out the investigation? Was there a trial? And am I talking about theft now? I'm talking about sabotage! Well, we don’t have an article for sabotage! Under Stalin was, but we do not! And for wrecking no ... They steal or not, the question is different. In addition to dismissal, officials have nothing to influence. And having fired an official, you get not a saboteur, but an oppositionist. And the higher the official rank, the higher his weight in the world and among various special services. I wrote, if you dismiss to Kolyma, this is one thing, but if you dismiss and ... Where?
            1. matross
              matross 13 May 2013 20: 31 New
              0
              Quote: Atlon
              Nonsense..

              You do not throw words, my friend!

              Quote: Atlon
              And who told you that this official is a thief? Did you carry out the investigation? Was there a trial? And am I talking about theft now? I'm talking about sabotage! Well, we have no article for sabotage! Under Stalin was, but we do not! And no wrecking ...

              And who told you that the official is a saboteur? Or a pest? Did you carry out the investigation? Was there a trial? Or, in your opinion, if you return these articles to the Criminal Code, then neither the investigation, nor the court will be needed?
              And, by the way, I used the common cliche "bureaucrat-thief" in a purely everyday sense, i.e. an official who is harmful by his activities in his post, and not as a criminal-legal qualification of acts committed by someone. There could be a bribe-taker and anyone, even a state traitor.
              I'm sorry to have to clarify such things.
      2. Boris55
        Boris55 13 May 2013 12: 26 New
        -1
        Quote: djon3volta
        put into practice this is possible only if you become president)))

        Do you believe in the omnipotence of the president? I - not really. My thoughts on this:
        http://klin.hutt.ru/viewtopic.php?id=790#p1428
        Tried to post a note here - did not miss. If possible, answer there.
  5. Canep
    Canep 13 May 2013 07: 26 New
    +2
    This is a good way to divide people into 1st and 2nd grade. This title will then be granted by membership in a political party, or by involvement in a clan. I think we have already passed this.
  6. Jurkovs
    Jurkovs 13 May 2013 07: 32 New
    10
    I would be satisfied if at least banned dual citizenship. The effect would be amazing, especially on television and in newspapers.
  7. Karabin
    Karabin 13 May 2013 07: 32 New
    +2
    A rare case when I agree with Atlon.
  8. Dimitr
    Dimitr 13 May 2013 07: 35 New
    +6
    And also give out yellow pants and when meeting two ku! Well, some nonsense in the head of some!
  9. atalef
    atalef 13 May 2013 07: 50 New
    +2
    .
    This money is inviolable. But interest from this amount, which accrues after a certain period of time, can be spent.

    Why then transfer money? It may be easier to charge interest belay
    Subsequently, it is possible to create a College of Citizens, which will determine whether a person is worthy of wearing this high rank and applying for resource capital. The majority of citizens should work in the collegium

    There is scope for activity. Rollback for the transition from citizen to CITIZEN
    But you must admit, the country's resources must work for its citizens. What tremendous opportunities are opening up before Russia.

    What a scope to really divide citizens into first, second, third grade and marriage in general.
    By the way, the rejection of a citizen is inherited?
    Some kind of nonsense. Article minus (sorry I can not put two minuses)
    An attempt to solve the problems of chaos and corruption by another bureaucratic body deciding the fate of people. negative
  10. aszzz888
    aszzz888 13 May 2013 07: 59 New
    +2
    Homeland must be treasured.
    And citizenship is another matter.
  11. treskoed
    treskoed 13 May 2013 07: 59 New
    +2
    We now have a large number of "citizens with a capital letter" - People's Deputies of various levels, who have been given certain rights and obligations to organize our state. And the bank account is replenished. And at the exit?
  12. capitosha1rang
    capitosha1rang 13 May 2013 08: 06 New
    +2
    Why reinvent the wheel?
    Trying to find a semblance of solutions in the West, we forget that Russia has a powerful underbelly - China, which it is time to recognize as our most reliable (I will not say - true) ally, who has experience that does not know equal in History. Including the experience of adjustment.
    There is no other civilization that would be distinguished by the same resistance to all crises that shook it and would come out of them "renewed, but the same."
    Chinese ideology allows a person to return again and again to the origins of humanity in himself, for it is focused on the "technique of the heart". This is the secret of the country's success.
    Recall the nearest, reliably recorded story:
    In 1834, under pressure from British merchants, the East India Company seized a monopoly on trade with China, which led to a boom in the sale of opium, and in 1835, opium amounted to 3 / 4 of China's total imports; imported opium smoked over 2 million people. In 1838, opium sales amounted to 2000 tons, millions of Chinese people of all classes and classes were involved in drug use. According to contemporaries, drug addicts were from 10 to 20% of the capital and from 20 to 30% of provincial officials; in individual institutions, from 50 to 60% of all officials did this. Among soldiers and officers, the smoking of opium became a general occurrence. The Chinese people were almost completely demoralized.
    Do you want to know how they, in spite of the whole world, and contrary to this, supposedly civilized world, rose up, pushing with their sharp elbows the tumbling stock exchange and banking crowd of the western flood?
    And who else wants to know?
    I don’t think there’s a line up like McDonald’s.
    This is not about consumption, but about the fact that you have to do something and do it.
    You can't argue with Comrade Stalin, but Demyan Bedny was right in many respects when he urged the Russian people: "Get up from the stove!"
  13. valokordin
    valokordin 13 May 2013 11: 02 New
    +1
    There is nothing to be done with this system of corruption. There is no political force in the country that can change anything. The Communist Party has not yet outlived itself, but its peaceful, conciliatory approach to solving problems entails a loss of influence among the population. If the Bolsheviks, who were few in number, had people who went to the people and despite the repressions of the authorities gained confidence in themselves. Now this work with people is not visible. The trade unions, their leaders, are complete compromisers with the bourgeoisie and serve them, no matter what BaShmakov says. Without real leaders, the people themselves cannot organize.
  14. optimist
    optimist 13 May 2013 11: 10 New
    +2
    An article, another chatter on an empty topic "what if ...". Fish, as you know, rots from the head. Stealing on a gigantic scale at the top, the authorities naturally look with their fingers at grassroots theft. Of course, to be honest: our common people are not ideal either. But he has an ironclad argument: "They steal billions upstairs, but I can't sleep a bag of grain ... can't I?" This vicious circle can only be broken by a change in the social and political system, and not by the division of citizens into "more" and "less" "honest."
  15. ultra
    ultra 13 May 2013 11: 36 New
    +2
    The author was clearly influenced by Robert Heinlein, something similar was described in one of his novels! hi
  16. Fitter65
    Fitter65 13 May 2013 14: 11 New
    0
    In the "Stupidity of the Year" nomination, the article is out of competition.
  17. Pablo_K
    Pablo_K 13 May 2013 16: 06 New
    0
    The Departier, with all due respect to him as an artist, probably received a passport,
    where it says that he is a citizen with a capital G