Sea Abyss Strike: A weapon that doesn't exist yet, but might appear
People once feared that their ships at sea would be attacked by such sea monsters. However, far more frightening is the invisible and silent death that can also come from beneath the water!
And I stood upon the sand of the sea, and saw a beast coming up out of the sea, having seven heads and ten horns: upon his horns were ten crowns, and upon his heads were blasphemous names.
Revelations of John the Evangelist, 13: 1
Revelations of John the Evangelist, 13: 1
Weapon from the realm of… fantasy?! Man has always feared the sea. And not without reason. The sea has drowned him, swamped the land with its waves, his ships, crews, and cargo have vanished without a trace, and finally, it was from the sea that devastating hurricanes came to land. It was terrifying to find yourself at sea in a storm, and those who survived it would immediately run to churches upon reaching shore to thank God for their salvation. However, there were also times when a ship would vanish at sea in completely calm weather, in clear sunshine, literally having just contacted land by radio and confirmed its coordinates. And then… vanished, as if it had never existed.
For a long time, no one could understand why this was happening, but then they realized that the culprit was... gas—gas rising from the depths of the sea and reaching the surface. The thing is, multiple gas bubbles, or even a single, huge gas bubble, rising to the surface, dramatically alter the physics of the sea. When gas is released en masse, the water becomes saturated with its bubbles, and its density drops sharply. According to Archimedes' principle: FA = ρж⋅g⋅V, where: FA is the buoyant force; ρж is the density of the liquid; g is the acceleration due to gravity; V is the volume of the submerged part of the body. And if ρж decreases, then FA becomes less than the weight of the ship, causing it to sink immediately. And it sinks instantly, simply falling into the sea abyss and... that's it! It's especially dangerous when a ship finds itself in the center of a giant gas bubble several hundred meters in diameter.
What gases rise from the seafloor? Primarily, methane (CH4) is the most common gas, which arises from the decomposition of organic matter, from the breakdown of crystalline hydrates (of which there are many on the ocean floor), and also from oil and gas accumulation zones. It is also emitted by underwater volcanoes.
The second most dangerous gas is hydrogen sulfide (H2S), a highly toxic gas with a rotten egg odor. Its sources include underwater decay of biological remains (for example, in the Black Sea at depths greater than 200 meters, this gas is abundant); volcanic activity; and the activity of sulfate-reducing bacteria.
Carbon dioxide (CO2) is also emitted from the seabed. Its "production" is linked to volcanic activity, the decomposition of carbonate deposits, and man-made leaks.
Gases such as propane, butane, and others also rise to the surface, which is associated with oil and gas fields.
The most dangerous areas of the world's oceans in terms of gas emissions are the famous Bermuda Triangle, where millions of tons of sargassum seaweed rot on the seabed and gas releases from crystalline hydrates. The Black Sea, with its thick hydrogen sulfide layer at depth, is a key vulnerability for the US, so while the Yellowstone Caldera is a vulnerable spot, for us it's precisely our beloved Black Sea. The Norwegian and North Seas have experienced accidents on drilling platforms due to unexpected releases of near-surface gas. The Gulf of Mexico, with its extensive oil and gas accumulation zones and underwater landslides, is also a danger. The Russian continental shelf (the Sea of Azov, the Caspian Sea, and the northern seas) is also dangerous, as methane emissions have also been recorded there.
This phenomenon is a natural one, although in some cases it is human-related. However, any natural phenomenon, say, a forest or steppe fire, can easily be turned into... a weapon, if you think about it. And if you think about it, in principle, albeit still purely hypothetical, you could come up with something like this...
Imagine a modern submarine with two rather narrow but long submersibles, similar to torpedoes or the Poseidon submersible, docked to either side. The "innards" of these super-torpedoes are very simple: a small control electronics unit, a motor with a fuel reserve (or a set of electric batteries), and... a warhead consisting of either liquefied gas or a substance capable of, say, heating up to release a huge amount of gas, for which purpose their surface is perforated with numerous small holes and plugs.
Well, then it's all simple. The submarine is moving at great depth and, let's say, stealthily approaches an aircraft carrier formation. Based on the data acquired during the development of this weapon, the onboard computer calculates the attack parameters: the target's depth, speed, torpedo speed, and the volume and rate of gasification. Our torpedo then rushes to intercept the enemy ship and... releases gas at a predetermined depth, which rises in millions and billions of bubbles so that this very gas spot ends up directly in the ship's path. The sea boils, and... the enemy vessel and its entire crew, who don't even have time to "gasp or breathe," immediately vanish into the depths.
Moreover, it's not necessary for the gas bubble that surfaces to be the size of the ship itself, or even larger. After all, if the ship is underway, a simple "gas pocket" opening directly ahead of it will be sufficient. After all, by diving into it at an angle and with its propellers running, it will sink deeper and deeper, and will no longer be able to rise to the surface, since it doesn't have a depth rudder like a submarine!
Clearly, the distance from concept to actual implementation is enormous. First, we need to determine whether this is practical. Then, we need to determine the best gas for filling such a "torpedo," as well as the best methods for generating it. It's entirely possible that this gas could be not only methane, but also another gas, say, hydrogen, which can lower the density of seawater even further. And lowering the density with a smaller volume of gas automatically reduces the size of the "torpedo" and the amount of gas-generating material it can carry. This requires a great deal of research and a significant investment of time, effort, and money to develop a truly combat-ready design.
But the effect of using such a weapon would be considerable. Just think: there's no roar of an explosion, no column of water, but a ship, at full speed, suddenly dives beneath a seemingly calm sea surface and never resurfaces. No SOS or cries for help, just a ship, now gone, just foam ripples dispersing across the surface. And then another ship disappears in the same manner, and at that point, all normal people would simply panic and... try to flee the area at full speed, which, incidentally, would only play into the submariners' hands, since the effect of such a "torpedo" would be more powerful the faster the ship's speed. Even a huge aircraft carrier could sink into the resulting "gas pocket" at full speed. First, it would rise upright, like the sinking Titanic, and then plummet to the bottom!
Moreover, not only "supertorpedoes" but also deep-sea naval mines can be armed in this manner. Essentially, it would be a large gas container capable of, if necessary, creating a gas bubble large enough to accommodate a frigate or corvette. If you don't respond to the mine's "friend or foe" interrogation, well, get a charge of gas bubbles and remember Archimedes' principle: ships can't float in freshly uncorked champagne!
An enemy submarine would also be in trouble if it were to suddenly encounter a cloud of such gas bubbles rising from the seabed. It would simply sink even deeper, below its maximum diving depth, where its hull would fail to withstand the pressure. As a result, the Thresher's fate would be sealed.
It's clear that all of this is nothing more than a rather extravagant hypothesis for now. But who knows what might happen in our world literally tomorrow? After all, "a fairy tale is a lie, but it contains a hint, a lesson for good fellows," as A.S. Pushkin, the genius of our Russian literature, once said!
Information