Why couldn't the KGB save the USSR?

24 804 199
Why couldn't the KGB save the USSR?
The KGB headquarters on Lubyanka in 1985


State Security


The State Security Committee was established by Decree No. 137/40 of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR on March 13, 1954. Initially, the KGB received the status of an agency with the rights of a ministry under the Council of Ministers (until 1978), and it included the "operational-Chekist directorates and departments" separated from the USSR Ministry of Internal Affairs.



The acronym "KGB" became one of the most recognizable Soviet (and Russian in general) symbols worldwide. The KGB Chairman was appointed by decrees of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet as a Union minister and automatically became a member of the Presidium. He and his deputies could be removed from office by a recommendation from the USSR Council of Ministers, but only with the approval of the CPSU Central Committee, as they were part of the Central Committee's nomenklatura. The KGB was under the control of the CPSU Central Committee. This status remained until 1991.

By 1991, the KGB had up to 500 members. Outwardly, it was a powerful intelligence agency, completely controlling the Soviet Union and wielding enormous influence worldwide. But in reality, the KGB was not a unified structure. Some departments and directorates had their own lives.

The First Main Directorate (PGU), or foreign intelligence, was practically a separate organization. The Fifth Directorate (the famous "Heel")—economic security (until 1960), combating ideological sabotage, and combating anti-Soviet and religious-sectarian elements—also lived its own life. Government communications troops, border troops (over 200 personnel), military construction units, "The Nine"—security for the top leadership, military counterintelligence (the Third Directorate), and so on—carried out their tasks.

Essentially, the Fifth Directorate was responsible for internal security. But the directorate's power was largely a myth, a legend spread by the KGB itself. Instead of truly combating the "fifth column," which had already taken root in the upper echelons of the nomenklatura and in the nationalist Ukrainian borderlands, the KGB played games with the Soviet intelligentsia—without much or significant results. They delved into mundane conspiracy theories, lowering their professional and operational standards. Meanwhile, in the late USSR, nationalist movements were maturing and developing right next to the KGB.

It's also worth noting that the Committee simply couldn't save the Union. The KGB had no power to intervene. An "order" was needed. Meanwhile, the USSR's top brass was either working to destroy it (Gorbachev and his team) or was paralyzed, lacking the necessary moral and willpower. Locally, the Soviet and party leadership either withdrew or joined the "wave," supporting the nationalist aspirations of the new leaders.

Reports and well-written analytical notes couldn't save the Soviet state. When the Soviet General Secretary himself launched "perestroika," with its most devastating consequences, a true leader of the caliber of Stalin and Napoleon was needed, with their moral and willpower qualities and willingness to shed blood for the sake of the Idea and power.

Degradation


We shouldn't forget the general degradation of the committee members' moral, volitional, and intellectual components. After Khrushchev, the country essentially lost its great Idea. Only an imitation remained. This quickly led to the degradation of the nomenklatura, the Communist Party, and, consequently, state security.

Younger generations of committee members no longer believed in communism in the 80s. Marxist-Leninist philosophy had long since ceased to interest anyone and was considered dead weight. People joined the party only for career advancement.

They played their role too Systemic flaws inherent in Soviet state security. Firstly, the Soviet intelligence services' focus on intelligence rather than long-term strategy and insight into enemy plans. In English, it’s “intelligence,” which means working with information, understanding the enemy’s intentions, and deciphering his way of thinking.

The Anglo-Saxons' strength lies in their long-term strategy. They make plans for decades and even centuries. Just look at history A thousand-year-old confrontation between East and West, the Western project of Rus'-Russia. Rulers and politicians change, powers and empires collapse, and the West persists in its efforts to resolve the "Russian question." Because it is a question of global dominance.

The USSR had excellent intelligence (espionage), but it was poorly managed, and there was no strategy for a long-term confrontation with the Western world (the capitalist system). Therefore, the Kremlin was poor at unraveling enemy plans and fell for disinformation and deception.

In the West, especially in the United States, intelligence relied on a powerful system of "think tanks" that developed strategy and long-term plans. In the Soviet Union, this role was to be played by the party. Stalin, the great leader and priest of the Red Empire, contemplated this. He considered transforming the Communist Party into an "Order of the Swordsmen," an organization-order that would focus not on executive power but on information work and ideology. However, the top nomenklatura refused to relinquish power, and Stalin was assassinated.

As a result, the Communist Party was preoccupied with politics, state affairs, and economic matters. The party became a bureaucracy—inert, inflexible, and desiring stability. The nomenklatura began to "degenerate" into new petty bourgeois and philistines. Furthermore, the upper echelons of the nomenklatura aged, descending into senility and feeblemindedness. Those who remained at the top were those with the qualities of merchants; the warrior-kshatriyas and Brahmin priests were gone.

Secondly, there was a loss of faith in communism, the victory of the USSR over the West, the capitalist system. Without an Idea, faith in a Great Cause, or patriotism, former communists and KGB officers quickly became mere cynics. And then they began to yearn for a compromise with their former enemies, to "live beautifully" and without problems.

In particular, Yuri Andropov, head of the KGB from 1967 to 1982 and head of the USSR from 1982 to 1984, placed his bets on convergence, the integration of the Union into Western civilization on terms favorable to Moscow. He believed that the USSR could not exist independently, and therefore, before it was too late, it was necessary to "restructure" the economy and reach an agreement with its Western masters. To enter into a marriage of convenience with the West and become an important part of the Western project.Andropov’s plan for Russia's integration into Western civilizationTo achieve this, he carried out a corresponding "purge" of the Soviet special services and security forces.

The Americans, despite their cynicism and other vices, never lost faith in their victory, so they worked more effectively. They were able to seize the initiative in the information and psychological warfare against Soviet civilization.The USSR's defeat in psychological warfare).

Thirdly, the Committee became bureaucratized. Those parts of it responsible for internal security. Career advancement required not just getting things done quickly and well, but the ability to please superiors. To pull the wool over people's eyes, to feign vigorous activity.

The KGB and GRU boasted strong minds and ardent patriots. Unfortunately, by the 80s, they were already in the minority. At that time, a completely different kind of person emerged. People willing to do anything for the "golden calf." These were outright cynics and scoundrels who joined the Committee not to fight for an Idea, for the Red Empire, but to "live the good life," enjoy privileges, travel abroad, earn good salaries and foreign currency. They exploited their positions.

The KGB no longer had any real enemies: the White Guards, the Basmachi, and the Nazis in the Baltics and Ukraine had already been defeated. Everything was quiet and calm. Therefore, careerists, slackers, imitators, and opportunists flocked to the Committee. In particular, the "golden youth," who saw the KGB as an opportunity to travel abroad and earn foreign currency.

So it turned out that American and Western intelligence agencies were better prepared for the development of the Cold War in the 80s than the KGB. The "political" part of the KGB degenerated into a gray bureaucracy; some took part in its collapse to get their own favor. Meanwhile, the combat units never received the order to eliminate the true enemies of the people.
199 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 10+
    26 February 2026 04: 31
    It's no surprise that fear of exposure is one of the most powerful motivators for the most inhumane crimes. And what did traitors and disloyalty agents in the USSR fear most? Of course, the KGB, which, if it so desired, could expose them and charge them with the death penalty. So why would Gorbachev, and then Yeltsin, suddenly create problems for themselves within their own intelligence agencies? They practically demonstratively destroyed them. They weren't fools; they understood that they were essentially traitors to the Motherland, betraying the country's interests to the Western political elite and its intelligence agencies for the chance to cling to power.
    1. +4
      26 February 2026 05: 06
      Essentially, the Fifth Directorate was responsible for internal security. Instead of truly combating the "fifth column," which had already taken root within the upper echelons of the nomenklatura and in the nationalist Ukrainian borderlands, the KGB played games with the Soviet intelligentsia—without much or significant results. They delved into mundane conspiracy theories, lowering their professional and operational standards. Meanwhile, in the late USSR, nationalist movements were maturing and developing right next to the KGB.
      It's enough to cite examples of the KGB's work with the Baltic republics. It's both bitter and funny.

      Take Dalia Grybauskaite for example. She was a currency prostitute, caught by the KGB in the act of sex work while patrolling a Soviet hotel for foreigners, agreed to work for the KGB to avoid a criminal conviction. Even the document proving her collaboration with the KGB remains. See the images below.
      And then through this very KGB she She became the first Russophobe and Lithuanian nationalist and even took the post of President of Lithuania.

      Dalia Grybauskaitė (born March 1, 1956, Vilnius, Soviet Union) is a former politician who served as President of Lithuania from 2009 to 2019. She was the first woman to hold this post.
      1. +7
        26 February 2026 06: 42
        Even a document about her cooperation with the KGB preserved. See pictures below.
        I have to disappoint you: the picture below cannot be considered evidence of her collaboration with the KGB.
        1. -4
          26 February 2026 14: 30
          Quote: Marrr
          Even a document about her cooperation with the KGB preserved. See pictures below.
          I have to disappoint you: the picture below cannot be considered evidence of her collaboration with the KGB.

          So you simply haven't read the Ministry of Internal Affairs document about her detention in an unauthorized place during Soviet times and have no idea how the KGB worked, or indeed how all intelligence services of all countries worked.
          1. +7
            26 February 2026 16: 12
            and you have no idea how the KGB worked
            You have no idea how the KGB worked.
            A handwritten note on the document you attached, made by an unknown person, cannot be evidence of her collaboration with the KGB.
            Her signature and other materials from the agent's personal file (ILM DL) could serve as evidence. But no one will show you these documents, even if they weren't destroyed in 91-92.
            1. -3
              26 February 2026 16: 33
              Quote: Marrr
              Her signature and other materials from the agent's personal file (ILM DL) could serve as evidence. But no one will show you these documents, even if they weren't destroyed in 91-92.

              Naturally, this goes without saying.
              However, as the saying goes, you can't hide an awl in a sack. Rumors still surfaced and leaked to the media.
              1. +2
                26 February 2026 17: 20
                Well, if you are sure that the rumors are a good reason to suspect her of collaborating with the KGB, then so be it, I don’t mind. Yes
                1. 0
                  26 February 2026 17: 35
                  Well, all this information about her has been publicly available on the Internet for a long time!

                  Find videos of her, dossiers, and articles about her. Some of them can still be found.

                  I've known this for a long time and my opinion about her has long since "settled" - drunk to the bottom and there is nothing new in it about her anymore!
                  hi
              2. 0
                4 March 2026 13: 31
                If every woman who is "rumored" is called a prostitute, then who will you marry?
                1. 0
                  4 March 2026 14: 11
                  Quote: canelo
                  If every woman who is "rumored" is called a prostitute, then who will you marry?

                  There's no smoke without fire. Everyone chooses for themselves who to marry.
                  On a virgin, for whom you were her first man!
        2. +2
          27 February 2026 13: 36
          I have to disappoint you: the picture below cannot be considered evidence of her collaboration with the KGB.

          True, and what's more, the document is fake, i.e. a counterfeit (I judge from my experience working with official documents)...
          1. +1
            27 February 2026 14: 40
            Perhaps, out of curiosity, I googled "Department of Social Services of the Main Directorate of Internal Affairs" - zero answers
            But ordinary people are willing to buy into this
      2. +6
        26 February 2026 07: 28
        Regarding the second picture. The bar at the Pribaltiyskaya Hotel is mentioned; that's where Dali's documents were checked. I was there in 84, staying at this hotel. At the time, it was a really cool bar in St. Petersburg; Finns (and Finn women, too) were always hanging out there, drunkenly wandering around the hotel. A bunch of their buses were parked outside the hotel. A bottle of whiskey cost 25 rubles at that bar back then.
        1. 0
          26 February 2026 14: 36
          Quote: Waterways 672
          Regarding the second picture.

          Absolutely right! For the crazy, pro-Western "girls" who work part-time for foreign currency, this was the perfect place; it was a hot spot.
      3. 0
        26 February 2026 10: 13
        Quote: Tatiana
        She was a currency prostitute, caught by the KGB doing sex work while patrolling a Soviet hotel for foreigners.

        In reality, she was simply caught in a contact situation. It was easier for her to admit to being a prostitute than to admit to working for the enemy. As a result, she also infiltrated the KGB, if the reports of her collaboration are true.
        1. 0
          26 February 2026 14: 50
          Quote from cpls22
          As a result, she also infiltrated the KGB, if the information about her collaboration is true.

          However, Dalia categorically refused to cooperate with the KGB and to talk about this dark spot in her biography, and she constantly proved her non-involvement in this past with her extremely rabid anti-Russian, Russophobic policies as President of Lithuania.
          Whose KGB hands did Dalia fall into, and who exactly worked with her there, is a question! We're talking about the KGB's failures here.
          1. 0
            26 February 2026 15: 10
            Quote: Tatiana

            However, Dalia categorically refused to cooperate with the KGB and to talk about the dark spot in her biography.

            This is natural for a politician. He must maintain the image of an honest knight, not a double agent.
            1. 0
              26 February 2026 15: 25
              Quote from cpls22
              Quote: Tatiana

              However, Dalia categorically refused to cooperate with the KGB and to talk about the dark spot in her biography.
              This is natural for a politician. He must maintain the image of an honest knight, not a double agent.

              And what good did Dalia Grybauskaitė, as a former KGB agent, do in Lithuania for Russia in gratitude to the USSR for her career thanks to the KGB?!
              Tell me! I know nothing about this and have never heard anything other than Russophobic, anti-Soviet, and anti-Russian nastiness and ugliness.
              1. +1
                26 February 2026 16: 02
                Quote: Tatiana

                And what good did Dalia Grybauskaitė, as a former KGB agent, do in Lithuania for Russia in gratitude to the USSR for her career thanks to the KGB?!
                Tell me!

                It seems you didn't understand my position. I made the assumption that at the time of her capture in the hotel and recruitment into the KGB, she was already an agent of Western intelligence services, and continued to work in this capacity, while the KGB considered her a simple informant, unaware of her true status.
                I'll add that, as she rose through the party ranks, she became untouchable for the committee, which gave her a completely free hand. Tatyana, you're pushing at an open door. wink hi
              2. +1
                26 February 2026 19: 15
                Quote: Tatiana
                And what good did Dalia Grybauskaitė, as a former KGB agent, do in Lithuania for Russia in gratitude to the USSR for her career thanks to the KGB?!

                Why should she do good to the Russian Federation, out of gratitude to the USSR? They're two different countries, in FACT... She went where it's most advantageous for the Balts to be today—Russophobes... and those who support the Russian Federation don't fit in there today. You probably expected the impossible from her...
                1. -3
                  26 February 2026 19: 24
                  Quote: Level 2 Advisor
                  Why should it do good to the Russian Federation, out of gratitude to the USSR? They are, in fact, two different countries.

                  Then give back to the Russian Federation, the successor to the USSR, all the good things that were built in the Lithuanian SSR under the USSR and that remain there! Don't be a slut, be a human being!
                  1. +2
                    26 February 2026 19: 38
                    Quote: Tatiana
                    Then give all the good things to the Russian Federation as the successor of the USSR.

                    I hope you read about the question - in what exactly is the Russian Federation the successor? Where is there anything about your proposed taking everything away from everyone?: there is no such thing there, you made that up yourself. The Russian Federation is not a complete successor in everything, but in specifically specified areas (treaties, diplomatic property of the USSR, etc.) inside RF for everything).
                    1. -1
                      26 February 2026 20: 54
                      Why are you advocating for the Nazi Baltics? Including Lithuania and its former President Dalia Grybauskaitė, who was the first to insist that Lithuania erect monuments to Lithuanian war criminals—Lithuanian SS members and others like them?
                      Lithuania is historically indebted to the USSR/Russia and the Soviet people for its liberation from the German invaders, whose inhabitants, according to Hitler's plans, were not supposed to exist. But The Nazi authorities in Lithuania are engaged in apartheid against the Russian, Belarusian and Polish peoples in Lithuania.. They follow in the footsteps of the modern Ukroreich in 404.

                      VK Video Soviet
                      See more: Why the Baltics hate Russia but will voluntarily join it? Published November 15, 2025 — https://yandex.ru/video/preview/17153084472869841284
                      1. +5
                        26 February 2026 22: 47
                        Quote: Tatiana
                        Why are you advocating for the Nazi Baltics? Including Lithuania and its former President Dalia Grybauskaitė, who was the first to insist that Lithuania erect monuments to Lithuanian war criminals—Lithuanian SS members and others like them?

                        and I didn’t think of advocating, I was simply surprised by your inflated expectations of her, that she would throw herself into defending the interests of the Russian Federation, nothing more.. Lithuania should historically the USSR, which, unfortunately, is long gone, and the Balts were legally just as Soviet as the other 12 republics... Soviet ones - they are no more... The Russian Federation has done nothing good for Lithuania and Lithuania has done nothing good for us in 35 years, they only try to do bad things to us, but then whoever they lie under calls the shots, as they say... and many people owe the USSR something, but after death, all the debtors forgot the borrower... however, this often happens... sad, but what can you do, although among the Balts there were already plenty of manifestations of Nazism in the 80s, as my uncle who served there told me...
                      2. 0
                        27 February 2026 01: 03
                        Quote: Level 2 Advisor
                        Russia has done nothing good for Lithuania and Lithuania has done nothing good for Russia in 35 years.

                        Not quite right. Or rather, not at all right. laughing
                        I saw quite a bit of money and materials being exported through Lithuania and other Baltic countries... and quite a bit of it stuck to people's hands...
                      3. +2
                        27 February 2026 07: 56
                        Quote from tsvetahaki
                        Not quite right. Or rather, not at all right.
                        I saw quite a bit of money and materials being exported through Lithuania and other Baltic countries... and quite a bit of it stuck to people's hands...

                        Well, they supplied us with some things, and we supplied them with others... some individuals made a good profit, both from them and from us... but it's hard to call it "done well" at the state level, if you compare it with many other countries of the former USSR...
      4. +9
        26 February 2026 11: 36
        Quote: Tatiana
        Take Dalia Grybauskaitė, for example. She was a hard currency prostitute, caught by the KGB in the act of sex work during a raid on a Soviet hotel for foreigners, and agreed to work for the KGB to avoid a criminal conviction.

        It is somehow doubtful that a currency prostitute taught at the Higher Party School under the Central Committee of the Communist Party of Lithuania and at the Moscow Academy of Social Sciences under the Central Committee of the CPSU.
        ...worked at the Vilnius Higher Party School under the Central Committee of the Communist Party of Lithuania, where she taught a course on political economy until 1990.

        In 1988, she defended her dissertation for the degree of candidate of economic sciences while pursuing a postgraduate degree at the Academy of Social Sciences under the Central Committee of the CPSU (Moscow), and also worked at the Academy of Social Sciences as a teacher.

        For that, she'd have been turned inside out. Since the days of the cornfield, the KGB had been nothing more than servants of the party bigwigs and couldn't interfere in party affairs without their permission. Especially since traces of that story were bound to remain both in the Leningrad Main Directorate of Internal Affairs and at the University.
        1. -1
          26 February 2026 15: 15
          Quote: Alexey RA
          For that, she'd be turned inside out. Because since the days of the cornfield, the KGB has been nothing more than a servant of the party bigwigs and couldn't interfere in party affairs without their permission.
          You're forgetting what the USSR was already like back then. Just look at Gorbachev, the anti-communist!

          REFERENCE
          From November 27, 1979 to October 21, 1980, he was a candidate member of the highest collegial body of power in the Soviet Union—the Politburo of the CPSU Central Committee. From October 21, 1980, he was a member of the Politburo.

          From March 11, 1985 to August 24, 1991, he was General Secretary of the CPSU Central Committee. He was elected to the post following the death of General Secretary Konstantin Chernenko at the suggestion of Soviet Foreign Minister Andrei Gromyko. He was re-elected for a second term in July 1990 at the 28th Congress of the CPSU.
          On October 1, 1988, he was elected Chairman of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR (the post was abolished in accordance with amendments to the USSR Constitution on December 1, 1988). On May 25, 1989, at the First Congress of People's Deputies of the USSR, he was elected Chairman of the Supreme Soviet of the USSR.

          In 1985, Mikhail Gorbachev initiated an anti-alcohol campaign in the USSR (it was curtailed in 1988). In 1986, he proclaimed a policy of glasnost, which subsequently lifted censorship restrictions in the USSR, proclaimed freedom of the media and the exchange of information, and began publishing previously banned works of art, historical documents, and other materials. That same year, Gorbachev first used the term "perestroika" to describe the reforms he had initiated in the country, stating that he would "equate the words 'perestroika' and 'revolution.'" In 1988, the electoral system in the USSR was changed, allowing for the nomination of candidates independent of the CPSU. In the spring of 1989, the first competitive elections in the country were held in the Soviet Union. Between 1986 and 1991, private commercial activity was legalized, privatization began, the state abandoned its monopoly on foreign trade, and a confiscatory monetary reform was carried out in 1991.
          See details - https://tass.ru/info/15601809
          1. +3
            26 February 2026 16: 02
            Quote: Tatiana
            You're forgetting what the USSR was already like back then. Just look at Gorbachev, the anti-communist!

            You don't know WHAT those years were. I was a graduate student at Kuban State University at the time, defending my dissertation on the history of the CPSU. There was no hint of any concessions for those "disloyal." The Party stood firm, just as before. And a woman with a stain on her record simply couldn't have studied in graduate school. Well, SHE COULDN'T. You only learned later that "those were different years." Later. But in "those years," the Communist Party and discipline were fine. Everything was eroding unnoticed... And Gorbachev wasn't an anti-communist. We cited his COMMUNIST STATEMENTS in our COMMUNIST DISSERTATIONS. You can even read them today, by the way.
            1. -2
              26 February 2026 16: 27
              Quote: kalibr
              KuSU

              What kind of State University is KuSU? I can't find its abbreviation in the boarding school.
              1. +3
                26 February 2026 16: 31
                Quote: Tatiana
                Quote: kalibr
                KuSU

                What kind of State University is KuSU? I can't find its abbreviation in the boarding school.

                That's because you weren't alive then, Tatyana. KuGU is Kuibyshev State University. And today, Kuibyshev is Samara! If you're interested, you can even look up my dissertation, which I defended there, online. It's there: "Party Guidance of Scientific and Technical Creativity of University Students in the Middle Volga Region During the 10th Five-Year Plan (Based on Universities in the Penza, Ulyanovsk, and Kuibyshev Oblasts)." Incidentally, the 10th Five-Year Plan was the most successful five-year plan in the history of the USSR.
                1. The comment was deleted.
                  1. +3
                    26 February 2026 17: 29
                    Quote: Tatiana
                    on her side!

                    That's all true. But to write accurately about a certain time, you have to live in it, and not just live there, but... get to know it from the inside. I lived there, and I know the period since 1959 very well. On one side of me were the children and families of workers, on the other, the intelligentsia, and then the village, the universities, the archives, lectures to the people, the factories... the coupons, the special collection of the Lenin Library, and so much more...
                2. -1
                  26 February 2026 18: 23
                  Quote: kalibr
                  That's because you weren't alive then, Tatyana. KuGU is Kuibyshev State University. And now Kuibyshev is Samara!
                  No offense, but this is because, compared to the Nasty Capital, which is self-sufficient in almost everything, Samara is a peripheral city.
                  And all revolutionary and perestroika historical events as social currents, as a rule, begin historically in the capitals and then, with a delay of 2-3 years, spread from them to the periphery, like ripples on the water from a stone thrown into the water.
                  Therefore, other cities were of little interest to me.
                  Quote: kalibr
                  If you're interested, you can even look up my dissertation, which I defended there, online. It's there: "Party Guidance of Scientific and Technical Creativity of University Students in the Middle Volga Region During the 10th Five-Year Plan (Based on Universities in the Penza, Ulyanovsk, and Kuibyshev Oblasts)."
                  I've written it down. I'll take a look when I have time, but it would be better if you sent me an email link.
                  I know all too well how the history of the CPSU and Marxist-Leninist philosophy were taught in Soviet times. It was all pedantic, tedious, and memorized, with students studying the classics of Marxism-Leninism from dictionaries just to get out of taking a supposedly unnecessary humanities subject in their technical specialty. However, I personally never had that experience. I graduated with honors twice, and in 1978, I passed the candidate's minimum exam in Marxist-Leninist philosophy with flying colors.

                  So, as a historian and propagandist, I have a test question for you. So why did Marxist-Leninist theory lose the battle against "market" ideology and its Milton Friedman-style monetarism? After all, it's precisely here—in the errors of the M/L theory—that the real problem lies!
                  1. +4
                    26 February 2026 18: 32
                    Quote: Tatiana
                    Bookworms, boredom, and cramming, students studying the classics of Marxism-Leninism from dictionaries, all to get out of taking a supposedly unnecessary humanities subject in their technical specialty. Personally, I didn't experience this. I graduated with honors twice, and in 1978, I passed the candidate's minimum exam in Marxist-Leninist philosophy with flying colors.

                    It's all true and not true. I personally haven't experienced this. This isn't bragging. You can't lie on the internet. Thousands of trained students can read this and pelt the liar with crap.
                    Quote: Tatiana
                    So, as a historian and propagandist, I have a test question for you. So why did Marxist-Leninist theory lose the battle against "market" ideology and its Milton Friedman-style monetarism? After all, it's precisely here—in the errors of the M/L theory—that the real problem lies!

                    Good question. But the real story isn't here. I've published many of my articles on the Russian village and peasants, on the proletariat, articles on Stalin's speeches at the 14th, 15th, 16th, and 17th Congresses—to trace the trends—texts from Pravda and the archives of the CPSU Regional Committee. Based on all this, I'll publish a series of articles on the causes of the collapse of socialism in the USSR. Follow me, visit VO.
                    The fact that you passed the MLF exam with flying colors speaks volumes about you. I only got a B... But I got A's on both exams on the history of the CPSU in 1985, before and after. Otherwise, I wouldn't have been able to pursue graduate school in CPSU history.
                    As for the center and the provinces... when you travel all over the country, working in the archives of Moscow, Samara, Saratov, Ulyanovsk, Podolsk, and then throughout Europe, these concepts somehow blur. I've published five books in St. Petersburg; I used to travel there as if it were work, lived there for weeks at a time, and I was and still am friends with many St. Petersburgers...
                    1. +1
                      26 February 2026 18: 47
                      From your answer, it's clear that, as a historian, you employ inductive reasoning in your research—that is, you collect historical facts, compare them, and analyze new phenomena by analogy with older ones. But for a complete, true understanding of what's happening, according to the dialectical-materialist method, this is not enough. A deductive analysis based on the principle of the unity of "induction and deduction" is also needed.

                      So my question still stands! Take your time and think it through!
                      1. +1
                        26 February 2026 18: 50
                        Quote: Tatiana
                        My question still stands! Take your time and think it over!

                        Everything will be in a series of articles on this topic.
                        Quote: Tatiana
                        Don't rush to answer

                        Don't make me laugh. I've been thinking about this since 1991 (and even earlier). My research boss told me that "at the top" it was decided to end socialism back in 1988, after the next party conference. Hurry up, he said, and defend yourself. Everything will collapse in 1995. It collapsed earlier...
                      2. 0
                        26 February 2026 19: 06
                        Quote: kalibr
                        I've been thinking about this since 1991 (and even earlier). My academic boss told me that "at the top" it was decided to end socialism back in 1988, after the next party conference. Hurry up, they said, and defend yourself. Everything will collapse in 1995. It collapsed earlier...

                        Your boss told you everything correctly! Namely,
                        I myself encountered the fact that already in 1986, an unofficial order was handed down from "above" to the philosophy department of the USSR Academy of Sciences not to assign any more topics to graduate students and, after two years, not to allow candidates for science to defend dissertations written from the standpoint of the dialectical-materialistic method.
                      3. +1
                        26 February 2026 19: 14
                        Quote: Tatiana
                        I encountered it myself

                        It's always nice to receive confirmation from...
                  2. +1
                    26 February 2026 18: 41
                    Quote: Tatiana
                    if you send me an email link to it.

                    Shpakovsky, Vyacheslav Olegovich.
                    Party guidance of scientific and technical creativity of students of the Middle Volga region during the ninth five-year plan, 1971-1975: dissertation ... candidate of historical sciences: 07.00.01 / Kuibyshev state university, 1988. - 186 p.
                    Storage code in the Russian State Library
                    OD 61 89-7/875
                    1. -1
                      26 February 2026 18: 51
                      Is there any digitalization of it?
                      1. +3
                        26 February 2026 18: 54
                        Quote: Tatiana
                        Is there any digitalization of it?

                        How should I know? After 91, I threw out my brick completely. I thought I was done with it forever. And I only found this text for you. I'm not interested in it today. I'm writing other books and articles. But the series on the collapse of the USSR will be the culmination of my work, and... a chapter in one of the next books. There's also a very interesting series here - "Poisoned Pen." It's the abstract of my daughter's doctoral dissertation and one of my graduate students' PhD thesis.
                  3. +4
                    26 February 2026 20: 14
                    Quote: Tatiana
                    So why did Marxist-Leninist theory lose the battle against "market" ideology and its Milton Friedman-style monetarism? It's precisely here—in the errors of the M/L theory—that the real problem lies!

                    Don't you think you've answered your own question?
                    It is obvious.
                    Shpakovsky is not a thinker. He is an opportunist, a notorious compiler, and a graphomaniac.
                    A normal person would never consider himself a scientist after writing such a shameful imitation (“dissertation”).
                    But he’s not even ashamed of her.
                3. -1
                  1 March 2026 22: 01
                  I don't mean to offend you; maybe it was important to you. But frankly, to me, the title of your dissertation sounds like "The Effect of Proxima Centauri Radiation on Milk Yield of Cows in the Verkhneudinsk District During Lotus Bloom in Central China"... And, it seems to me, your dissertation had exactly the same scientific significance...
                  1. 0
                    2 March 2026 06: 14
                    Quote: Doc1272
                    I don't mean to offend you; maybe it was important to you. But frankly, to me, the title of your dissertation sounds like "The Effect of Proxima Centauri Radiation on Milk Yield of Cows in the Verkhneudinsk District During Lotus Bloom in Central China"... And, it seems to me, your dissertation had exactly the same scientific significance...

                    I don't mean to offend you either, but you clearly don't understand the point of a dissertation if you think 80% of them are written for scientific purposes. And I didn't care what I wrote about, as long as there was LESS WORK. A candidate's dissertation in the USSR, and even now, is akin to a student's diploma thesis, only at a higher level. In it, a person demonstrates their ability to work with archival materials, collect, summarize, draw conclusions, logically justify their position, and document it. THAT'S IT! Showed it? Well done – here's your diploma. And the science begins (or doesn't begin) later. You've earned the right to practice it, to work in archives. Got it? Search for "SHPAKOVSKY'S BEST BOOKS" and see how many university textbooks there are, written and published AFTER THE DEFENSE. And then there are those who defended their dissertation, received a PhD in History, and kept quiet. Check out the website of the German publishing house Lambert and take a look. And also Osprey Publishing House in England... And AST in Russia has the "Large Illustrated Atlas" series. Now do you understand why people write these dissertations? The scientific benefit from them, of course, is very limited, and everyone involved in science knows and understands this! Things are better with dissertations in engineering and applied sciences, that's for sure!
                    1. 0
                      Yesterday, 15: 02
                      Теперь понятно...а я то наивный, считал что диссертация это компиляция результатов каких-то научных изысканий....)))
                      1. 0
                        Yesterday, 15: 43
                        Quote: Doc1272
                        диссертация это компиляция результатов каких-то научных изысканий

                        Вы правильно считали. Это действительно так и тем не менее это не более, чем квалификационные работы. В том числе и показывающая, что ты умеешь проводить исследования, работать в документами архивов, строить гипотезы и их доказывать.
        2. +1
          27 February 2026 14: 10
          These are valid doubts; besides, a superficial analysis of the letter shows that it is simply a fake...
      5. +5
        26 February 2026 11: 51
        Your pictures are complete bullshit, as evidence. Furthermore, for fools and amateurs, hotels for foreigners were always under the KGB's radar, even with active officers attached, and "free" prostitutes simply didn't hang out there, even with Komsomol or trade union cards. And the cops didn't just show up for inspections. Well, if you watch enough of Todarovsky's nonsense - "Intergirl" - you'll believe anything.
      6. +1
        27 February 2026 09: 05
        And the following year, she experienced a career boost: "...after having had her fill of fun and returning to Vilnius in 1983, Grybauskaitė worked at the Vilnius Higher Party School under the Central Committee of the Communist Party of Lithuania, where she taught a course on political economy until 1990." And then we see a dramatic change of pace.
      7. 0
        1 March 2026 12: 04
        Quote: Tatiana
        work for the KGB to avoid a criminal sentence

        What documents indicate that she faced criminal liability?
    2. +4
      26 February 2026 05: 11
      The "political" part of the KGB degenerated into a gray bureaucracy; some took part in the collapse in order to get their cookies.
      So they led the collapse of the USSR!
    3. +4
      27 February 2026 01: 09
      With all that said, are the intelligence services in the West nothing but turbo-patriots?
      And they don’t go there for a career?
      However, the system is designed in such a way that they outplayed us.
      It's not about individuals.
      Whether in a large company, a state, or a large government structure, the main thing is not the enthusiasm of individuals (it sometimes plays a big role), but the system itself.
      Which either corrupts or drives out ineffective, careerist people...
      1. 0
        27 February 2026 01: 40
        Quote from tsvetahaki
        They outplayed us.

        We outplayed ourselves; if it weren’t for the eternal readiness of our elites to betray the country, then this whole tragedy would not have happened.
      2. 0
        27 February 2026 05: 58
        Quote from tsvetahaki
        Are there only turbo-patriots in the special services in the West?
        And they don’t go there for a career?

        They are more honest in their desire to earn more money and work less. And the thirst for power is perfectly understandable and is accepted as an additional incentive. Most importantly, all this is done without the lies and hypocrisy required in the USSR, meaning it's predictable and manageable. This is where the advantages come from. For example, in the US, there's a well-known method of legitimizing corruption—it's called lobbying. Politicians who lobby for private companies even pay taxes for this. Or there's a law passed in the US and EU that prohibits companies from spending more than 10% on entertainment expenses, significantly reducing their ability to pay kickbacks to officials when receiving government contracts, even in other countries.
        1. 0
          27 February 2026 18: 43
          The main thing is that all this is done without the lies and hypocrisy necessary in the USSR.

          You're completely out of touch here! It's especially funny to read American newspapers' comments on the Germans in World War I.
          Well, and about the USSR - they themselves are laughing NOW.
          Lobbying... That's for the congress. And then there are the regular and sophisticated employees of various agencies.
          So, THEIR OWN (for example, from a very close history - the Democrats) - they leaked information and acted in the name of promoting completely illegal things - right up to the search of the former president with a "shoot if there is resistance" warrant.
          But they worked for OUTSIDES in very rare cases...
    4. 0
      1 March 2026 11: 57
      Quote: Vitaly.17
      They practically demonstratively destroyed them.

      Tell me how?
      1. 0
        1 March 2026 12: 03
        Quote: victor50
        Tell me how?

        You need to talk to KGB retirees. I just witnessed the results.
        1. 0
          1 March 2026 12: 29
          Quote: Vitaly.17
          You need to talk to KGB retirees. I just witnessed the results.

          I observed what was happening and knew many of the employees then, and I still do. That's why I asked. I think if you're not aware of it, you shouldn't write about a "demonstrative collapse."
          1. 0
            1 March 2026 13: 01
            Quote: victor50
            I observed what was happening and was familiar with many of the employees then, and I still am.

            Then you might want to remember those employees who fled to the West at the beginning of perestroika. That's one person per year, and two in 92. It's probably worth remembering those who jumped out of windows, supposedly committing suicide, and those who shot themselves or were shot by their wives.
            Quote: victor50
            No need to write about "demonstrative collapse"

            Don't censor based on the opinions of your acquaintances. There are no former employees, and the truth is, even if they're your friends a hundred times over, they won't tell you after a few drinks. They're specifically selected, taught to keep quiet and gain trust. It's better to look at the facts. There are situations that are difficult to analyze for various reasons. Then there are several approaches: the biblical "you'll recognize them by their actions" and the modern "look who benefits."
            1. +1
              2 March 2026 05: 44
              Quote: Vitaly.17
              Quote: victor50
              I observed what was happening and was familiar with many of the employees then, and I still am.

              Then you might want to remember those employees who fled to the West at the beginning of perestroika. That's one person per year, and two in 92. It's probably worth remembering those who jumped out of windows, supposedly committing suicide, and those who shot themselves or were shot by their wives.
              Quote: victor50
              No need to write about "demonstrative collapse"

              Don't censor based on the opinions of your acquaintances. There are no former employees, and the truth is, even if they're your friends a hundred times over, they won't tell you after a few drinks. They're specifically selected, taught to keep quiet and gain trust. It's better to look at the facts. There are situations that are difficult to analyze for various reasons. Then there are several approaches: the biblical "you'll recognize them by their actions" and the modern "look who benefits."

              They told me a lot of interesting things. They taught me how to communicate with employees, but not a word about the demonstrative collapse.
  2. +6
    26 February 2026 05: 19
    After Khrushchev, the country essentially lost its great idea. Only an imitation remained.
    Wonderfully formulated!
    But the combat units never received the order to liquidate the real enemies of the people.
    The situation is no better now!
    1. +3
      26 February 2026 05: 35
      The whole atmosphere of that time is reflected in the photo: in the parking lot there is a Zhiguli, a UAZik and a Mercedes! winked
      1. +5
        26 February 2026 07: 09
        It looks like the Mercedes isn't ours. If you look closely, you'll see it has red diplomatic plates.
        1. +3
          26 February 2026 09: 55
          Quote: Waterways 672
          He has red diplomatic plates.

          This agent arrived with a report on the work... winked
  3. +2
    26 February 2026 05: 55
    Even now, it's unlikely anyone will tell you how to properly build socialism. But I'm sure that when the world's people face unbearable hardship, they will turn to the USSR's experience. Perhaps it will be a slightly different kind of socialism. But the human need for social equality will never die.
    1. +4
      26 February 2026 10: 25
      Quote: Nikolai Malyugin
      Even now, it's unlikely anyone will tell you how to properly build socialism. But I'm sure that when the world's people face unbearable hardship, they will turn to the USSR's experience. Perhaps it will be a slightly different kind of socialism. But the human need for social equality will never die.

      Lately I've been thinking about the same thing more and more. I'm sure that without socialism there is no future for humanity. We see all these Epstein islands, the leaps and antics of the Soros and Rothschild clan. The smiles of the Trumps... the politics in Europe, and even here in Russia, not everything is well... The world, humanity is moving towards thermonuclear destruction.
      1. +1
        26 February 2026 19: 23
        Quote: 30 vis
        We see all these Epstein islands, the leaps and antics of the Soros and Rothschild clan, the smiles of the Trumps, the politics in Europe, and even here in Russia, not everything is well...

        Under ancient Rome, things weren't any better (Nero, Caligula).. but... humanity lives on.. and as for socialism, in the countries of developed capitalism, over the last 100 years, a lot of socialism has appeared.. so everything is as usual for humanity.. true, not in all countries.. but that's also as always..
    2. +2
      26 February 2026 12: 42
      But the human need for social equality will never die.

      Greed and self-interest will never die. Someone will always want to live better than everyone else.
      1. +5
        26 February 2026 16: 05
        Quote: a.shlidt
        Greed and self-interest will never die. Someone will always want to live better than everyone else.

        Exactly!
  4. +7
    26 February 2026 06: 19
    I read the author's pseudonym below and all questions immediately disappeared.
    There is no point in commenting on speculative fantasies
    But here is this statement attributed to Andropov:
    We need to "restructure" the economy and reach an agreement with the Western masters. Enter into a marriage of convenience with the West.
    The reference to your own article is simply touching - one fantasy is supported by another fantasy laughing
  5. -8
    26 February 2026 07: 10
    The USSR was ruled by Ukrainians. What orders did you want from them?
    1. 0
      1 March 2026 12: 10
      Quote: Vatnik_
      The USSR was ruled by Ukrainians. What orders did you want from them?

      Previously, everything was blamed on the Jews. laughing Maybe it was aliens or the US directly?!
      We ourselves are never to blame for anything; all our troubles are imposed on us by someone. wink
      1. -1
        1 March 2026 12: 47
        You should read the biographies of the Politburo members. Just for general education.
  6. +4
    26 February 2026 07: 13
    Is it true that the Garant was once a KGB colonel? If so, I'm just asking.
    1. +8
      26 February 2026 08: 08
      It's true that just recently they were organizing Helicopter races in Moscow. The current ones aren't far behind. We can see the results at SVO, in particular.
      1. +1
        26 February 2026 11: 01
        On G-wings specially rented for this occasion.)
    2. +2
      26 February 2026 08: 42
      And he "served" in the aforementioned 5th Directorate! Now the glorification of Solzhenitsyn and other scum is clear.
    3. 12+
      26 February 2026 08: 48
      Quote: Chack Wessel
      Is it true that the Garant was once a KGB colonel?

      No! Putin was never a KGB colonel, he was a lieutenant colonel. After the unification of Germany, he returned to St. Petersburg and was enlisted in the reserves, joining Sobchak. After Sobchak's failure to be re-elected as mayor, Chubais took Putin into the presidential administration. Then Yeltsin offered Putin the position of head of the FSB and the rank of general. Putin declined the general's rank, saying he wouldn't be understood in the FSB, but he did receive the rank of colonel.
      Thus, Putin was a lieutenant colonel of the KGB of the USSR, then a colonel of the FSB of Russia, which is not the same thing.
    4. +5
      26 February 2026 09: 37
      lieutenant colonel and member of the CPSU
    5. 0
      27 February 2026 14: 16
      At the time of his dismissal, he was a lieutenant colonel, and Yeltsin promoted him to reserve colonel when he appointed him to the position.
  7. +3
    26 February 2026 07: 38
    Why couldn't the KGB save the USSR?
    Who is the president of the Russian Federation? Isn't he a former KGB colonel? We should remember Viktor Ivanenko, who served as a senior inspector and department head from 1986 to 1991, and from the mid-1990s, deputy head of the KGB's inspectorate. Oh, what a villainous fate! suddenly He was elevated from May 1991 to the acting chairman, and from August 5 to November 26, 1991, he was the chairman of the re-established KGB of the RSFSR. According to him, during the State Emergency Committee, he and Stepashin called the regional KGB departments and urged them to support the legally elected President of the RSFSR, Yeltsin, and then arrested his immediate superior, the Chairman of the KGB of the USSR, V. A. Kryuchkov. Yeltsin's advisor, Sergei Stankevich, recalled his role during the defense of the White House during the days of the State Emergency Committee:

    The key member of the headquarters was the Chairman of the KGB of the RSFSR, Viktor Ivanenko... Whenever an operational problem arose, we went to Ivanenko. He quickly determined which agencies or bodies needed to be contacted to resolve the issue, found his contacts there, and soon the problem was resolved... Ivanenko was amazingly effective. Thanks to him, we knew exactly which units had been deployed to the city, where they were stationed, and what tasks they had been assigned. We even knew the composition of the operational headquarters created by the State Emergency Committee to monitor the situation in Moscow. Through Ivanenko's channels, we also received information about the impending assault on the White House. Then there was Bakatin, who gave up everything possible and impossible. Primakov, apparently, was also from there, so former KGB officers were in charge then... and today.
  8. +2
    26 February 2026 07: 57
    The KGB had no way to intervene in the events. To do so, an "order" was needed.

    And the USSR Armed Forces couldn't save it – they needed an order, which Yeltsin immediately gave when it was necessary to shoot the Supreme Soviet...
    The rottenness of the entire elite and the state-criminal conspiracy deprived the people of a people's (not party) state.
    Why has Putin never once expressed his opinion on the reasons for the collapse of the USSR and the role of the KGB in it, despite having direct ties to this service?
    1. -3
      26 February 2026 09: 33
      Bolshevism is the essence of Russian civilization.

      Quote: yuriy55
      Why has Putin never expressed his opinion on the reasons for the collapse of the USSR?

      Is the 20th Congress of the CPSU giving you no peace? Not enough action?

      Putin does not adopt laws that determine the domestic policy of the state.
      Putin does not control the treasury - our Central Bank is independent, including from the president.

      Putin will say that the communists (Trotskyists) are to blame for the collapse of the USSR, and then what? Will the people revolt? No, they won't! The people vote for the bourgeoisie's nominees at every election. The people like the raising of the retirement age, the people are thrilled by the constant rise in prices for everything and everyone. The people like this government, this Duma, which passes laws in the interests of the bourgeoisie!

      So what's the point of shaking the air?
      1. +4
        26 February 2026 11: 12
        The President of the Russian Federation has the right to postpone the adoption of any law except constitutional ones. A presidential veto is overridden by a two-thirds vote. He can refer any law to the Constitutional Court for review. We do not have separate laws defining domestic or foreign policy. The President of the Russian Federation nominates a candidate for the position of Governor of the Bank of Russia no later than three months before the expiration of the current Governor's term. The State Duma then appoints the Governor of the Bank of Russia for a five-year term by a majority vote of all State Duma deputies. In other words, the State Duma either supports or rejects the candidate nominated solely by the President of the Russian Federation. The Central Bank is independent of the Government of the Russian Federation, but in reality it is closely linked to the Presidential Administration. The Prosecutor's Office and the Investigative Committee, which are not directly controlled by the Government but are formed by the President with the participation of the Federation Council, have a similar, but not identical, status. And within the Government there is a power bloc, that is, ministers, although part of the Government, are actually appointed directly by the President after formal consultation with the Federation Council.
        1. -3
          26 February 2026 11: 28
          Bolshevism is the essence of Russian civilization.

          Quote: Sergej1972
          The President of the Russian Federation has the right to postpone the adoption of any law

          Constitution of the Russian Federation: Article 105
          Clause 1. Federal laws are adopted by the State Duma..
          And what does the president have to do with the adoption of laws?

          Quote: Sergej1972
          And the president's veto is overridden by a two-thirds vote.

          A 2/3 majority is already a constitutional law, and he is its protector. A clear example of who's boss.

          Quote: Sergej1972
          We do not have separate laws that determine the domestic or foreign policy of the state.

          Constitution of the Russian Federation. 80 Article.
          n.3. President of the Russian Federation in accordance with the Constitution of the Russian Federation and federal laws defines the main directions of domestic and foreign policy of the state.

          The President determines it, but the Duma, through the adoption of laws, forms it.
          (Raising the retirement age is an example of how the Duma shapes domestic policy)

          Quote: Sergej1972
          The Central Bank is independent from

          Constitution of the Russian Federation. Article 75.
          Item 2. Protection and ensuring the stability of the ruble is the main function of the Central Bank of the Russian Federation, which he carries out independently of other public authorities.

          Including from the President, Prime Minister, Duma and other government bodies.
          1. +5
            26 February 2026 11: 38
            According to the Constitution of the Russian Federation, the president has the right to sign and promulgate federal laws. This is enshrined in Article 83 of the Constitution, which states that the president "signs and promulgates federal laws."
            The main provisions regarding the president's right to sign laws:
            Signing deadline. A federal law passed by the State Duma and approved by the Federation Council is sent to the president for signature and promulgation within five days. The president is obligated to sign and promulgate the law within 14 days of its receipt.
            Veto power. If the president rejects a bill within 14 days, the State Duma and the Federation Council reconsider it in accordance with the procedure established by the Constitution. If, during the reconsideration, the bill is approved in its previously adopted version by a majority of at least two-thirds of the total number of senators of the Russian Federation and deputies of the State Duma, it must be signed by the president within seven days and published.
            Appeal to the Constitutional Court. The President has the right, within the established time limit, to appeal to the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation to review the constitutionality of a federal law. In this case, the deadline for signing the law is suspended while the Constitutional Court considers the request. If the Constitutional Court upholds the constitutionality of the law, the President is obligated to sign it within three days of the ruling. If the constitutionality is not upheld, the President returns the law to the State Duma without signing it.
            Publication of the law. After being signed by the president, the law must be officially published in accordance with the procedure established by the Federal Law of June 14, 1994, "On the Procedure for the Publication and Entry into Force of Federal Constitutional Laws, Federal Laws, and Acts of the Chambers of the Federal Assembly."
            Federal laws come into force simultaneously throughout the entire territory of the Russian Federation after 10 days from the date of their official publication, unless the law itself establishes a different procedure for entry into force.
            Thus, the president has the right to either approve or reject a law, but if it is re-approved by a qualified majority of parliament, he is obliged to sign the law within the specified time limit.

            This all applies to federal laws. There is also a category of constitutional laws. They have a different procedure.
            The procedure for signing federal constitutional laws (FKZ) in the Russian Federation is established by the Constitution of the Russian Federation and differs from the procedure for ordinary federal laws.
            A federal constitutional law shall be considered adopted if it is approved by: two-thirds of the votes of the total number of deputies of the State Duma; three-quarters of the votes of the total number of senators of the Russian Federation.
            Presidential signature deadline. After approval by parliament, the adopted Federal Constitutional Law must be signed by the President of the Russian Federation and published within 14 days.
            Veto Power. Unlike ordinary federal laws, the president cannot override (veto) a federal constitutional law.
            Appeal to the Constitutional Court. The President has the right to appeal to the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation within 14 days to review the constitutionality of a Federal Constitutional Law. In this case, the deadline for signing the law is suspended while the court considers the request.
            The lack of veto power over constitutional laws is understandable. After all, they are already passed exclusively by a qualified majority vote of State Duma deputies and Federation Council senators. But constitutional laws are few in number, and they are passed on a limited range of critical issues.
            1. +3
              26 February 2026 12: 48
              You're arguing who's worse: the Tsar or the boyars? To me, they're all birds of a feather.
            2. +5
              26 February 2026 13: 56
              What a strange reaction from a downvoter.) This is factual information I provided for reference. It cannot be refuted.
            3. +7
              26 February 2026 14: 08
              Sergei, you're wasting your time trying to prove anything to Boris. Boris is from the sect of the immaculate, powerless, deceived by all, yet simultaneously irreplaceable and omnipotent. It's a matter of faith, and you're citing the Constitution to him.
            4. -3
              27 February 2026 08: 13
              Bolshevism is the essence of Russian civilization.

              Quote: Sergej1972
              According to the Constitution of the Russian Federation

              And? Where is at least one reference to the article of the Constitution?
              I give you the articles of the Constitution, you give me your spatial fabrications about the Constitution.
              1. +2
                27 February 2026 14: 23
                This is a summary of the text of the Constitution of the Russian Federation. My reasoning is in one paragraph. Here is a link to the text of the Constitution of the Russian Federation from the website of the President of the Russian Federation. http://www.kremlin.ru/acts/constitution Read Chapter 5, Articles 103-108.
              2. +3
                27 February 2026 14: 33
                Article 104

                1. The right of legislative initiative belongs to the President of the Russian Federation, the Federation Council, senators of the Russian Federation, deputies of the State Duma, the Government of the Russian Federation, and legislative (representative) bodies of the constituent entities of the Russian Federation. The right of legislative initiative also belongs to the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation and the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation on matters within their jurisdiction <*>.
                2. Bills are submitted to the State Duma.
                3. Bills on the introduction or abolition of taxes, exemption from their payment, on the issuance of government loans, on changes in the financial obligations of the state, and other bills providing for expenses covered by the federal budget may be introduced only with the conclusion of the Government of the Russian Federation.
                Article 105

                1. Federal laws are adopted by the State Duma.
                2. Federal laws are adopted by a majority of votes of the total number of deputies of the State Duma, unless otherwise provided by the Constitution of the Russian Federation.
                3. The federal laws adopted by the State Duma shall be submitted within five days to the Federation Council for consideration.
                4. A federal law is considered approved by the Federation Council if more than half of the total number of members of this chamber have voted for it or if it has not been considered by the Federation Council within fourteen days. In case of rejection of a federal law by the Council of the Federation, the chambers may create a conciliation commission to overcome the disagreements that have arisen, after which the federal law is subject to repeated consideration by the State Duma.
                5. In case of disagreement of the State Duma with the decision of the Council of the Federation, a federal law is considered adopted if at the second vote at least two thirds of the total number of deputies of the State Duma voted for it.

                Article 106

                Federal laws adopted by the State Duma on the following issues are subject to mandatory consideration in the Federation Council:
                a) federal budget;
                b) federal taxes and fees;
                c) financial, currency, credit, customs regulation, money emission;
                d) ratification and denunciation of international treaties of the Russian Federation;
                d) the status and protection of the state border of the Russian Federation;
                e) war and peace.

                Article 107

                1. The adopted federal law is sent to the President of the Russian Federation for five days for signing and promulgation.
                2. The President of the Russian Federation, within fourteen days, signs the federal law and promulgates it.
                3. If the President of the Russian Federation rejects a federal law within fourteen days of its receipt, the State Duma and the Federation Council shall reconsider the law in accordance with the procedure established by the Constitution of the Russian Federation. If, upon reconsideration, the federal law is approved in its previously adopted version by a majority of no less than two-thirds of the total number of senators of the Russian Federation and deputies of the State Duma, it shall be signed by the President of the Russian Federation within seven days and promulgated. If, within the specified period, the President of the Russian Federation requests the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation to review the constitutionality of the federal law, the period for signing such law shall be suspended pending the consideration of the request by the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation. If the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation upholds the constitutionality of the federal law, the President of the Russian Federation shall sign it within three days of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation rendering the corresponding decision. If the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation does not uphold the constitutionality of the federal law, the President of the Russian Federation shall return it to the State Duma without signing.
                1. +3
                  27 February 2026 14: 35
                  Article 108

                  1. Federal constitutional laws are adopted on issues provided for by the Constitution of the Russian Federation.
                  2. A federal constitutional law shall be deemed adopted if approved by a majority of no less than three-quarters of the total number of senators of the Russian Federation and no less than two-thirds of the total number of deputies of the State Duma. An adopted federal constitutional law shall be signed by the President of the Russian Federation and promulgated within fourteen days. If, within the specified period, the President of the Russian Federation requests the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation to review the constitutionality of a federal constitutional law, the period for signing such law shall be suspended pending the consideration of the request by the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation. If the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation upholds the constitutionality of a federal constitutional law, the President of the Russian Federation shall sign it within three days of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation rendering the corresponding decision. If the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation does not uphold the constitutionality of a federal constitutional law, the President of the Russian Federation shall return it to the State Duma without signing it.

                  Article 109

                  1. The State Duma may be dissolved by the President of the Russian Federation in cases provided for in Articles 111, 112 and 117 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation <*>.
                  2. In the event of the dissolution of the State Duma, the President of the Russian Federation shall set a date for the elections so that the newly elected State Duma convenes no later than four months from the date of dissolution.
                  3. The State Duma may not be dissolved on the grounds provided for in Article 117 of the Constitution of the Russian Federation within one year after its election.
                  4. The State Duma may not be dissolved from the moment it brings charges against the President of the Russian Federation until the Federation Council adopts a corresponding decision.
                  5. The State Duma may not be dissolved during the period of martial law or a state of emergency in effect throughout the territory of the Russian Federation, or during the six months prior to the expiration of the term of office of the President of the Russian Federation.
      2. 0
        27 February 2026 17: 42
        Tell me, do you consider everyone to be idiots?
        1. -2
          28 February 2026 08: 35
          Bolshevism is the essence of Russian civilization.

          Quote: Chack Wessel
          Tell me, do you consider everyone to be idiots?

          Only those who freely interpret the Constitution - the Basic, fundamental Law of the country.

          At the beginning of the dialogue there is a free interpretation of the Constitution.
          Then they reprinted the article of the Constitution. Thank you, I have the Constitution of the Russian Federation.
          Specifically, which claims are made under which article of the Constitution is not specified.

          I am generally against this Constitution, but lawlessness is much worse than any bad Law.
    2. 0
      3 March 2026 22: 01
      Quote: yuriy55
      The rottenness of the entire elite and the state-criminal conspiracy deprived the people of a people's (not party) state.

      Well, at least someone admitted that everything at the top in the USSR had rotted to dust...

      Quote: yuriy55
      Why has Putin never once expressed his opinion on the reasons for the collapse of the USSR and the role of the KGB in it, despite having direct ties to this service?
      and why NO ONE communists of all stripes have not yet condemned officially decisions of the 20th Party Congress?
  9. +4
    26 February 2026 07: 59
    Remember the famous phrase of F. Dzerzhinsky that Is the Cheka a combat unit of the party? So, the KGB's cadre was replenished from the ranks of Party and Komsomol officials. And the higher the rank of a Party and Komsomol functionary, the more stars they had on their shoulder straps. And beginning with the Khrushchev period (except for I. Serov), all KGB chairmen came from the CPSU Central Committee: A. Shelepin, V. Semichastny, Yu. Andropov, V. Fedorchuk, V. Chebrikov, V. Kryuchkov, and V. Bakatin. Of these, only V. Fedorchuk was a Chekist, and even then only briefly, while V. Kryuchkov also distinguished himself as head of the First Main Directorate (intelligence), replacing F. Mortin, also a former CPSU Central Committee official. There were also transfers back – from the KGB to the CPSU Central Committee. A certain E. Ivanov, having left the KGB for the CPSU Central Committee with the rank of lieutenant colonel, worked there for several years, and then returned to the KGB, this time with the rank of major general and the position of deputy of the Second Main Directorate (counterintelligence). After working in the KGB for several years, he returned to work for the CPSU Central Committee. But he didn't stay there long either – he returned to the KGB and was promoted to head of the Fifth Main Directorate (ideological counterintelligence) with the rank of lieutenant general.

    Now, do you think the KGB could have saved the USSR? The KGB, which consisted entirely of party functionaries for whom the party's decisions were law! And at the head of the party stood Gorbachev and the CPSU Central Committee and Politburo he appointed? Bottom line: no one ever rebels against themselves...
    1. +2
      26 February 2026 09: 16
      Quote: Luminman
      And starting from the Khrushchev period (except for I. Serov), all the KGB chairmen came from the Central Committee of the CPSU

      This is a Stalinist tradition - NKVD People's Commissars Yezhov and Beria were members of the Central Committee of the All-Union Communist Party (Bolsheviks) from 1934.
      1. +2
        26 February 2026 11: 48
        At the time of his appointment as People's Commissar, Yezhov was Secretary of the Central Committee, Chairman of the Party Control Commission under the Central Committee, and a member of the Central Committee's Organizational Bureau. And all of these positions remained with him after his appointment as People's Commissar. From 1937 onward, he also became a candidate member of the Politburo. Moreover, he held these positions, perhaps formally, for several months after his dismissal as People's Commissar of Internal Affairs. Yagoda was not a member of the Central Committee until 1934. And Abakumov was never a member of the Party Central Committee.
    2. +5
      26 February 2026 09: 31
      Quote: Luminman
      Only V. Fedorchuk was a Chekist, and not for long

      Yes, Fedorchuk's career began and continued in military counterintelligence. But calling him a Chekist is a stretch. After all, it was he, after becoming Chairman of the KGB, who shouted that "it's time to knock the spirit of Chekism out of the brains of our employees." He's a scumbag, not a Chekist. Moreover, according to the recollections of those who encountered him, he was a rare jerk, a bit thick-headed, but proactive and persistent. The outcome is predictable: a strong embrace from Parkinson.
      hi
      1. +6
        26 February 2026 11: 50
        He was later sent to lead the Ministry of Internal Affairs. I read that neither KGB veterans nor Ministry of Internal Affairs veterans liked him. Although I've also seen positive reviews about him online.
    3. +3
      26 February 2026 11: 20
      During Stalin's time, the People's Commissar was appointed not just as a Central Committee member, but as the Secretary of the Central Committee, Chairman of the Party Control Commission under the Central Committee, and member of the Central Committee's Organizational Bureau, Yezhov, who soon became a candidate member of the Politburo. His successor, Beria, came from the party organs of Transcaucasia and also soon became a candidate member of the Politburo. State Security Minister Ignatiev was also a party worker. Fedorchuk, I believe, was a Chekist for many years and headed the KGB of the Ukrainian SSR for quite a long time.
      Serov was an interesting figure. Coming from a military background, he had direct access to Stalin during Beria's tenure as NKVD chief. He only joined the state security services in February 1939, meaning he had no involvement in the mass repressions of the Yagoda and Yezhov eras. On the other hand, he had established friendly relations with Khrushchev even during Stalin's reign.
    4. 0
      1 March 2026 12: 22
      Quote: Luminman
      So, the KGB's cadre was replenished from among party and Komsomol officials. And the higher the rank of a given party or Komsomol functionary, the more stars they had on their shoulder straps.

      Nonsense. At least two future KGB officers studied with me. KGB recruitment was highly organized, and vetting was thorough. But a different spirit was already in the air, and socialist values ​​were being questioned at every level. There was a lot of lies and foolish propaganda. And naturally, upon reaching certain career levels, a person became a member of the Central Committee. Just as it was impossible to achieve high positions without being a member of the Communist Party of the Soviet Union. I wonder if it was ever any different in our country? Perhaps now someone can attain a high position simply by virtue of their personal qualities and professionalism?
  10. +1
    26 February 2026 08: 00
    You shouldn't talk so frivolously about ideas! "For Faith, Tsar, and Fatherland," "For the Motherland!", "For Stalin"—these are ideas... They inspired heroism, the restoration of the country after the devastation and war. But how can we live today without ideas? How can we direct those who spent years at war to rebuild the economy in the former Ukraine? All this playing with a ceasefire will ultimately lead to collapse or war. The war will definitely end with our victory, but only when we reach the Western borders. And then what? Who is thinking today about what to do next? How and who will rebuild the devastated economy? You can't do this without an idea, without influencing people's minds. Today, minds are completely disorganized due to the lack of this idea. Some fight, others dance on the bones!
    1. +2
      26 February 2026 13: 01
      Today there is complete confusion in people’s minds due to the absence of this Idea.

      Is war or the Soviet Military District an idea? All significant events in our history were accompanied not only by an IDEA, but also by a real improvement in their lives. People not only understood why they were bending their backs, but they also saw the results. They were felt.
    2. 0
      26 February 2026 16: 11
      Quote from Songwolf
      How can we live today without an idea?

      It's Easy!
  11. +4
    26 February 2026 08: 13
    [QuoteWhy couldn't the KGB save the USSR?] [/ Quote]
    Were there any attempts?
  12. 0
    26 February 2026 08: 17
    The entire KGB turned out to be traitors? That's a bit oversimplified. The only thing I don't understand is how they overlooked Gorbachev; "TRAITOR" is written all over his face!
    1. +2
      26 February 2026 08: 35
      One of the reasons they chose Gorbachev was because it was a "gun carriage race." It didn't seem serious anymore. They needed someone younger, so they chose him, to our detriment.
      1. -1
        26 February 2026 09: 27
        Gromyko proposed Gorbachev for the position of General Secretary, the other Politburo members accepted, and Gorbachev dismissed them all and recruited his own people to the Politburo. Gorbachev helped the USSR's enemies seize the USSR, and they, "in gratitude," de facto overthrew him.
        The enemies of the USSR also betrayed their subsequent "leaders." They simply have a penchant for betrayal.
        1. +1
          26 February 2026 11: 24
          He didn't disperse them immediately; the process dragged on until the end of 1989. Gromyko, for example, was a member of the Politburo until the fall of 1988, serving as Chairman of the Presidium of the Supreme Soviet. Shcherbitsky headed the Central Committee of the Communist Party of Ukraine and was a member of the Politburo until September 1989.
          1. -3
            26 February 2026 11: 30
            Well, naturally, Gorbachev spent 2-3 years preparing a coup, and he sold it to the people that he was going to build “socialism with a human face.”
    2. -3
      26 February 2026 08: 54
      Bolshevism is the essence of Russian civilization.

      Quote: APASUS
      There's just one thing I don't understand: how did they overlook Gorbachev?

      This was a targeted policy pursued by the communists (Trotskyists) after the death of the Bolshevik Stalin to build NEP 2.0.

      Let me remind you. It was Andropov who sent young reformers to Switzerland for advanced training in destroying Stalin's legacy—the USSR. It was Andropov who allowed the anti-Soviet Lyubimy Theatre on Taganka to exist.

  13. +5
    26 February 2026 08: 20
    I think that Andropov's role in the collapse of the USSR is underestimated.
  14. +3
    26 February 2026 08: 22
    Why didn't the committee members save the USSR? Because they were the ones destroying it. Just look at where the former committee members are now and what they control... Read and listen to Fyodor Razzakov: "From the Deep Security Police to the Deep KGB"...
    1. -6
      26 February 2026 09: 30
      The enemies of the USSR, in order to justify their seizure of the USSR, slandered both the Bolshevik communists and the Chekists.
      And during the "freedom" of the enemies of the USSR in the 90s, opposite this building in the photo, drugs were freely sold at Pharmacy No. 1
      1. -5
        26 February 2026 10: 43
        Bolshevism is the essence of Russian civilization.

        Quote: tatra
        Bolshevik communists

        Bolsheviks - Lenin, Stalin.
        Communists - Troiki, Khrushchev and so on down the list.
        It is impossible to put the Bolshevik Stalin, who gave an ice axe to Trotsky, and Trotsky himself on the same level - that's crazy.

        Quote: tatra
        Enemies of the USSR

        Look how many of them there are, the "enemies" of the USSR:
        1. -2
          26 February 2026 11: 17
          First of all, there was another rally.
          The rally on February 23, 1991, on Soviet Army and Navy Day, organized by the parliamentary groups "Soyuz" and "Moscow," attracted, by conservative estimates, between 600 and 800 participants. These were primarily factory workers, employees, veterans, cadets, and military academy students. For the first time, such a massive demonstration expressed clear distrust of Boris Yeltsin.

          Secondly, the result is that those who rushed to the White House to defend Yeltsin in August 1991, shouted "Yeltsin, Yeltsin" at the top of their lungs, ran to anti-Soviet rallies, forced Yeltsin onto us as President in June 1991, and then cowardly pretended they had "nothing to do with it," that the Communists had caused everything during Perestroika.
          1. +1
            26 February 2026 11: 35
            This is a rally against the CPSU, against the Trotskyists. But instead, we got a Vlasovite Yeltsin, who raised the flag of his idol, Vlasov.
          2. +3
            26 February 2026 11: 50
            Quote: tatra
            Secondly, the result is that those who rushed to the White House to defend Yeltsin in August 1991, shouted "Yeltsin, Yeltsin" at the top of their lungs, ran to anti-Soviet rallies, forced Yeltsin onto us as President in June 1991, and then cowardly pretended they had "nothing to do with it," that the Communists had caused everything during Perestroika.

            No, it's the communists who are now trying to pretend that they had nothing to do with the catastrophe.
            They say it wasn't their general secretary who announced it Perestroika, Glasnost, Acceleration and spoke from the stands about new thinkingAnd all the decisions that ultimately led to the collapse of the USSR were not made by the leadership of the CPSU or the republican communist parties. And it wasn't the communists who orchestrated the persecution of Nina Andreeva, who dared to call for an end to the smearing of the USSR's history and the embrace of capitalists.
            1. -3
              26 February 2026 11: 53
              Is there anything that you, enemies of the communists, did during the Soviet period, and during your evil anti-Soviet period, for which you would take responsibility?
              Or is it completely useless to expect you to be able to act like normal people even once in your life?
              1. +4
                26 February 2026 13: 04
                It's the same old story - the party that destroyed the USSR is the one shouting "stop the thief" loudest and calling on everyone around to be held accountable for what that party has done. laughing

                The communists of the 80s had no more fearsome enemies than themselves. There was no need for spies or saboteurs—the architects of perestroika and the rank-and-file enforcers carried party cards in their pockets. They also systematically plundered the state, under the leadership of regional first secretaries. guiding and unifying force (And the threads leading to Moscow were successfully cut by investigative teams.) The parasites devoured their host and then blamed it on some enemies.
                1. -5
                  26 February 2026 13: 17
                  Ha, the enemies of the USSR and the Soviet people are so programmed AGAINST others that they no longer have the mentality or intelligence to answer FOR themselves and what they themselves have done.
              2. +1
                26 February 2026 16: 18
                Quote: tatra
                What did you, enemies of the communists, do during the Soviet period, and in your evil anti-Soviet period, for what would you take responsibility?

                I was a communist, but I wasn't an enemy of the communists at the time. On the contrary, I actively fought for the implementation of party policy, defended my dissertation on party management of university science (how to improve it), and lectured to the public in praise of the CPSU. And all my colleagues from the five departments of CPSU history, the five departments of scientific communism, and the five departments of Marxist-Leninist philosophy at the five Penza institutes behaved exactly the same way. I became one after the events of 1991... and not right away. I read Trotsky's "The Revolution Betrayed" and began to think... and then!!!
                1. +3
                  26 February 2026 20: 30
                  Quote: kalibr
                  I was a communist, but I was not an enemy of the communists at that time.

                  What is this?...What is this about?...
                  Quote: kalibr
                  I became one after the events of '91... and not right away. I read Trotsky's "The Revolution Betrayed" and started thinking... and then!!!

                  So you, my friend, are not a communist, but a real Trotskyist!
                  1. -1
                    27 February 2026 06: 18
                    Quote: Silhouette
                    and a real Trotskyist!

                    Before you write, think with your head, not your butt!
    2. +1
      26 February 2026 20: 36
      Quote: Monster_Fat
      Read and listen to Fyodor Razzakov: "From the Deep Security Service to the Deep KGB"...

      Let them not read anything and listen to anyone...
  15. +3
    26 February 2026 09: 02
    Apparently there was a conspiracy between the authorities and security forces.
  16. +1
    26 February 2026 09: 24
    Samsonov shouldn't get involved in places where his knowledge, criminal elite, and a mixture of heresy, nonsense, and speculation are.
    1. 0
      26 February 2026 16: 21
      Quote: Andrey VOV
      Samsonov shouldn't get involved in places where his knowledge, criminal elite, and a mixture of heresy, nonsense, and speculation are.

      That's a fair point. He should have worked in the party archives, defended his dissertation on party leadership, and then...
      1. 0
        26 February 2026 20: 39
        Quote: kalibr
        He should work in the party archives, defend his dissertation on party leadership, and then...

        Become a speculator?
        That is unlikely.
        People like him weren't allowed anywhere near the party archives back then. They were rejected even at the application stage.
        1. 0
          27 February 2026 06: 21
          Quote: Silhouette
          People like him weren't allowed within cannon shot of the party archives back then.

          So where does the knowledge on this matter come from? From hearsay, from other people's books, written by the same fantasists, because there are no archival links in them.
      2. -1
        27 February 2026 07: 30
        He doesn’t even need to go to the archives, read or watch the lectures of Kalpakidi and Spitsyn.
        1. +1
          27 February 2026 09: 35
          Quote: Andrey VOV
          He doesn’t even need to go to the archives, read or watch the lectures of Kalpakidi and Spitsyn.

          With all due respect to other experts, I always trust my own opinion, based on documents. I've repeatedly seen the subjectivity of many researchers' views, and by following them through the very documents they cited, I've seen that they sometimes missed interesting points. Therefore, you always have to do everything yourself.
  17. +1
    26 February 2026 09: 30
    .
    Younger generations of committee members in the 80s no longer believed in communism. Marxist-Leninist philosophy no one was interested in her for a long time and she was dead weight.
    It's a true observation—no one among the young people back then was interested in her, nor in the mythical communism. She was interested in real life.

    The great leader and priest of the Red Empire, Stalin, thought about this.
    "The priest didn't even leave his party - the party congress unanimously debunked him and demolished all the monuments and cathrites, so it's an unfortunate example
  18. -4
    26 February 2026 09: 41
    All three "leaders" of the USSR's enemies acted in exactly the same way: upon becoming leaders of the state, they immediately began replacing people in the highest echelons of power with those with whom they had committed the crimes they had committed against the country and its people. And, along with all the enemies of the USSR, they shifted the blame for what they had committed onto Soviet communists and security officers.
  19. -2
    26 February 2026 09: 51
    Why couldn't the KGB save the USSR? Because after Ivan Stalin, a gradual process of economic degradation began, and the KGB didn't control the economy. A classic situation developed: those at the top couldn't govern in the old way, while those at the bottom didn't want to live in the old way and were waiting for change.
    The riddle of those times: a long green thing smells like sausage. The answer: a commuter train from Moscow. A total shortage of food and consumer goods, despite the fact that the USSR at that time ranked second in the world in GDP, after the United States. The need for change became clear to everyone, and riding this wave of expectations, at the instigation of A. Gromyko, a leading industrialist from the periphery, M.S. Gorbachev, emerged with his team of reformers.
    1. +2
      26 February 2026 10: 15
      Again, that hackneyed example with sausage. But cheap fish, caviar, real butter and milk, cheese, and bread are somehow forgotten. Sausage isn't exactly the healthiest product, and the Soviet regime emphasized providing healthy foods; everything else was a last resort, but THERE WAS, by the way. Don't forget about the price and quality of that same sausage. You can't find a Doctor's sausage like that for any price these days, for example. The "total food shortage" wasn't permanent either, but only a short period of time when coupons were issued, and even then, the question is how real it was and how much was artificial. I vividly remember buying squid as a student in the hungry 90s, after the collapse of the USSR; even then, it was cheap and of excellent quality. Now, not every student can afford it.
      1. +1
        26 February 2026 10: 35
        I'm generally amazed by the enemies of the USSR. They have a lot of airs and graces, but they have absolutely no self-esteem. They're poisoned with low-quality and counterfeit "products," and they gobble it all up and rejoice at how good it is, because at least now they have everything, unlike in the USSR.
        1. -2
          26 February 2026 15: 46
          These are the parasites, they're happy with everything, and they fear the return of the USSR more than anything. Of course, they'll smear the USSR with disdain, stopping at nothing. Even despite the obvious, everyone already sees what capitalism is and where it leads.
        2. 0
          26 February 2026 16: 28
          Quote: tatra
          They eat it all up and rejoice at how good it is, but now they have everything, not like in the USSR.

          That's not true. I pay a lot of attention to the quality of my food. My daughter didn't even know the taste of fizzy drinks until she was 10. And my granddaughter, she's 23, has never had a Fanta or Coca-Cola. Everything we eat is brought to us from the markets by our farmer friends. And the honey and fruit are our own, hard-earned at our dacha. Minimal sugar. Maximum grains are grown at our dacha, right down to the Cypriot beans, brought from Cyprus. By the way, we make our own sausage, homemade, or from farmers we know who raise their cattle on grass. Are they cheating? No! You can't fool your taste buds after a good, healthy meal. I can easily distinguish the meat of a rabbit raised on grass from meat raised on... anything else. Well, stupid people eat everything, right? Not just the enemies of communists, but communists themselves.
      2. -1
        26 February 2026 10: 43
        Quote: oz_777
        The "total food shortage" was also not permanent, but only a short period of time when coupons were issued, and even then there are questions as to how real it was,

        There was no food shortage, coupons (1978-1981) were a complete fiction, they were not used, there was simply no need, even if there were some interruptions in food supplies (meat, sausage) - there were cooperative stores, markets and there were no problems.
        Moreover, this concerned the RSFSR; there were no similar problems in the union republics.
        1. +4
          26 February 2026 12: 05
          Quote: bober1982
          There was no food shortage, coupons (1978-1981) were a complete fiction, they were not used, there was simply no need, even if there were some interruptions in food supplies (meat, sausage) - there were cooperative stores, markets and there were no problems.

          From the perspective of a resident of a city in the first supply category in the RSFSR, everything was truly wonderful. But, as always, the regions spoiled everything. smile
          Due to the difficulties that have arisen in providing food, in many regions and districts of the USSR it is practiced to issue such products as meat, butter, eggs, sausages on coupons, which are issued by housing and communal services or house managements on a monthly basis.
          © Letter from workers of the Uralalmaz mine to the chairman of the Krasnovishersky District Executive Committee L.V. Leontyev with a request to introduce food stamps. November 1978.
          The stores do not have essential products: meat, dairy, vegetables, fish. There is no public catering in the canteen either. There is nothing on the order tables either.

          © Letter from workers of the Ural Chemical Plant to the CPSU Central Committee and local party bodies with a request for the introduction of food stamps. May 1979
          There was no meat at all for 2 years. Recently they gave us a little 0,500 grams per person on coupons, but that happens once a year. And once they gave chickens on coupons, so they gave half a chicken for two people. They don't even bring bones, and when they do, you can't buy them, they only sell 1 kg per person in line, and I was 1th in line and I didn't have enough.
          So what's going on? How am I supposed to feed my family, how am I supposed to feed my children? Today I went to the market and saw speculators selling laundry soap for 1 ruble a bar, and I couldn't buy any. In this day and age, when there's been no war for 30 years, where has all this gone? There's no fish at all; hake, flounder, and cod are in short supply. You can occasionally get pollock, but even that's rare.
          © An anonymous letter from a resident of the city of Chusovoy to the editor of the newspaper “Pravda” about the disgraceful supply of food and essential goods to the city. March 1980
          ...as a result of the Solikamsk District Executive Committee's ban on the import of agricultural products by residents of this district to the Berezniki market, private trade in these products has sharply declined.
          The city's workers, most of whom work in hazardous conditions, are experiencing significant difficulties in obtaining meat and dairy products.
          © Letter from the Secretary of the Berezniki City Committee of the CPSU G.G. Belkin to the Perm Regional Committee of the CPSU on providing the workers of the city of Berezniki with livestock products. February 18, 1981

          The meat shortage situation even reached the point of being mentioned in Brezhnev's speeches. Apparently, it was ignored. long, green, and smelling of sausage it was no longer possible.
          Quote: bober1982
          Moreover, this concerned the RSFSR; there were no similar problems in the union republics.

          And the more the republic received from the union budget, the louder the cries later became about "stop feeding Moscow." smile
          1. 0
            26 February 2026 12: 15
            Quote: Alexey RA
            Letter from workers of the Ural Chemical Plant to the CPSU Central Committee and local party bodies requesting the introduction of food stamps. May 1979.

            Quote: Alexey RA
            An anonymous letter from a Chusovoy resident to the editor of Pravda newspaper about the city's dismal supply of food and essential goods. March 1980.

            Just because citizens were outraged—no one would print anything like that in the newspapers of those years, so it had to be that way. That is, all this scribbling was done at the instigation of the party authorities themselves.
            And, I repeat - this only concerned the RSFSR, its fellow union republics continued to live in luxury, it did not concern them.
          2. +1
            26 February 2026 15: 31
            So, does this mean the situation was like this throughout the country? What about Siberia, my personal experience, when black and red caviar was available in children's cafes in a workers' settlement? When all the stores were stocked with delicious, cheap fish, the kind you can only dream of now! Excellent cuisine, everything you could want was there. Why, when there were excellent, high-quality products all over the country, you cite letters from individuals. Does that mean the entire country, the entire Soviet Union, was starving???? Watch the movies, they show Soviet citizens bloated from hunger, right? We were showered with pineapples and peaches in a Siberian village. Yes, this happened maybe a couple of times during the entire period, and too much at one time. There were distribution costs, but the country suffered. And we didn't bloat from hunger! And once again, remember the QUALITY of those products and have a conscience already. They just can't forgive the sausage. And the apartments are free, utilities are cheap, healthcare and education, and the whole list goes on and on—do you remember that?? In fact, if you compare what was and what has become, it's a crime against the people, the most vile in Russian history. And they still can't forgive the sausage. There are simply no words. The country knows what awaits it with this exchange rate, and it's unlikely to be anything good. If it even exists.
            1. 0
              26 February 2026 19: 35
              Quote: oz_777
              When all the stores were stocked with delicious, inexpensive fish, the kind you can only dream of now! There was excellent cuisine, everything you could possibly want.

              Being a post-Soviet person, I often come to the thought that for many and in many ways (not in everything) the "thirst for the USSR" is simply - "the grass was greener, I was prettier and the girls gave it to me"... as usual - the bad is forgotten - the good remains (that's how memory works).
              1. +3
                27 February 2026 01: 45
                Another song about nostalgia. What does it have to do with it if there are facts? What did people have then and what do they have now? What were the working and living conditions like? Millions of people say things were much better in the USSR, but there will always be those who will explain what to think and feel, because they know best.
                1. +1
                  27 February 2026 01: 53
                  Quote: oz_777
                  but there will always be those who will explain what to think and feel, because they know better than anyone.

                  Well, some people really did get better after the collapse of the Soviet Union, especially in the 90s. I'm talking about the oligarchs and other nouveau riche.
                2. +1
                  27 February 2026 12: 16
                  Quote: oz_777
                  Another song about nostalgia.

                  So it doesn't have any effect at all?
                  Quote: oz_777
                  Millions of people say that things were much better in the USSR.

                  and also millions - don't want to go to the USSR
                  Quote: oz_777
                  There will always be those who will explain what to think and feel, because they know better than anyone.

                  there were plenty of them in the USSR too

                  P.S. I'm not a fan of the current situation, but what's the point of wanting it in the USSR? It won't happen anyway... The point is, to summarize, the USSR had stability—that's what made it valuable for the majority, who valued stability above all else. But there was no personal freedom, which is also needed by a portion of the population—so the Chinese are great for understanding that. Meanwhile, now there's only freedom and almost no stability, and even freedom is being curtailed even more, which is even worse. So, in many ways, the USSR was better than it is now, but at the same time, they're two extremes—it would be best not to jump to either one or the other, assuming that we're no longer in the USSR anymore...
          3. +4
            26 February 2026 15: 40
            "There's no fish at all; hake, flounder, and cod are in short supply. Pollock is occasionally available, but even that's rare." - That's just ridiculous. I suspect all these letters are a hoax. The entire country was awash with fish. A quote from the Strugatsky brothers: "I ducked into the nearest store, which turned out to be a delicatessen, walked along the counters, and confirmed that there was sugar. The selection of sausages and candies wasn't extensive, but the selection of so-called fish products exceeded all expectations. There was such salmon and such salmon!" Who are you talking to when the entire country was feeding cats capelin, which now sells for the price of a delicacy.
    2. -5
      26 February 2026 13: 46
      The further west you went from Moscow, the better life was, and vice versa. The stores had nothing but seaweed; fortunately, bread wasn't rationed. Everything else was distributed among workers. Cats wouldn't eat the sausage, so people from all the neighboring provinces traveled to Moscow for food and consumer goods. The preponderance of monetary value over commodity supply and the dictated pricing policy led to the emergence of a black market with market prices.
      1. +3
        27 February 2026 03: 44
        Quote: Jacques Sekavar
        ...The sausage was an earthy color, the cats didn't eat it
        ? belay
        During the Soviet era, all sausages were produced in strict accordance with GOST standards. !!! And therefore - "Don't talk nonsense, it hurts her!". wink In the late 1970s and 1980s, if you bought "Rusanovskaya" or "Lyubitelskaya" sausage, whether in the Urals or Ukraine, you wouldn't be able to detect any significant difference in taste!!! They were practically identical. Yes And the price is also the same! wink
        Nowadays, when you buy sausage made from bone meal with starch, you can see that pets shy away from it, looking at the owner with bewilderment and sympathy if he eats it at the table...
        1. 0
          27 February 2026 09: 41
          Quote: Vl Nemchinov
          Nowadays, when you buy sausage made from bone meal with starch, you can see that pets shy away from it, looking at the owner with bewilderment and sympathy if he eats it at the table...

          Who's forcing you to buy it? The best sausage is cow tongue!
  20. 0
    26 February 2026 10: 55
    Quote from Uncle Lee
    So they led the collapse of the USSR!

    They have actually led a lot of things...
  21. +2
    26 February 2026 11: 07
    Quote from Uncle Lee
    The whole atmosphere of that time is reflected in the photo: in the parking lot there is a Zhiguli, a UAZik and a Mercedes!
    This is not a parking lot, but a road - cars drive past the monument on a roundabout and they only reflect the intensity of the traffic flow in those years
    Judging by the license plate, the Mercedes is from the embassy.
  22. -1
    26 February 2026 11: 25
    The Chairman of the KGB was not automatically included in the Presidium of the Council of Ministers.
  23. +1
    26 February 2026 11: 29
    Why couldn't the KGB save the USSR?

    Because, upon its creation, the KGB was immediately banned from spying on the top party leadership. Subsequent organizational measures and personnel purges made the KGB the "communist" nomenklatura's main accomplice in the assassination of the USSR.
  24. +3
    26 February 2026 11: 54
    A. Samsonov is a "great expert" on the KGB! Where did he get this nonsense?
  25. +2
    26 February 2026 12: 59
    The Committee simply couldn't save the Union. The KGB had no power to intervene. An "order" was needed for that.

    Of course, of course! laughing
    But professional ethics didn't allow you to figure out that things were going badly and report it to your superiors, perhaps in the harshest possible manner (to give them a good shake-up and, if you like, to scare them)?
    In my opinion, our special services degraded even during Stalin's time, when they began reporting to their superiors what they liked and keeping silent about what they didn't like, so as not to incur their wrath.
    In short: the threat to the integrity of the USSR was wasted, the Nazification of Ukraine was wasted, and the militarization since 2014 was wasted as well.
    A separate word about Ukraine: everyone familiar with the matter knew that Ukraine was slowly but inexorably being Nazified. (Even I, who hasn't been there for 30+ years but witnessed the beginning of the process, back in 1990.) The Russian government was drooping its ears and rejoicing at the trade turnover, which, according to our leader, should indicate good relations between the countries. For some reason, the upper echelons of power created the illusion that we would be greeted with flowers, although a cursory glance at Ukrainian internet resources indicated that the people there were leaning toward the EU (75%), not the Union State (15%, the remaining 10% favoring non-aligned positions. Data before the SVO).
    Does intelligence not read the internet or is it simply reporting to Putin what he wants to hear?

    It's incredibly annoying when such a responsible job involves sycophants in uniform with big stars!
    They're probably also reporting to the Leader that everyone's thrilled about the YouTube and Telegram block and the relocation to RuTube and Max. And the people are also calling for unity between the oligarchs and the poor, with pensions of 16 rubles!
    Won't it turn out like 100 years ago? In 1914, everyone was enthusiastically singing "God Save the Tsar!", patriotism was through the roof, and then—bang!—the Russian people suddenly went nuts in October 1917. The Bolsheviks, you see, deceived gullible Russians, fooled the Orthodox! Oh-oh-oh! Save yourself if you can!
    1. +1
      26 February 2026 13: 12
      Quote: MBRBS
      But professional ethics didn't allow you to figure out that things were going badly and report it to your superiors, perhaps in the harshest possible manner (to give them a good shake-up and, if you like, to scare them)?

      So all these reports flowed within the system, from the bottom up. And they reached the heads of the regional and central committees. And they were already more politicians than intelligence officers. A report that "everything is bad" could get you kicked out of the Central Committee—especially since everyone else...secretaries for..."They would insist that the comrade is exaggerating, that these are isolated shortcomings, but under their management everything is generally excellent.
      Moreover, the Central Committee did not really trust those who purged the party at the temporary detention center. smile
    2. -2
      26 February 2026 13: 22
      And to WHOM were the Chekists supposed to report? To Gorbachev, who launched a wholesale slander against them? After all, it was he, along with the "Architect of Perestroika" Alexander Yakovlev, who declared the general name for places of detention for criminals in the USSR—the Gulag—a "crime" of the Communists.
      And the enemies of the communists have been repeating this in chorus since Perestroika.
      1. 0
        26 February 2026 13: 29
        Quote: tatra
        And who were the Chekists supposed to report to? Gorbachev, who...

        Yes, precisely to him! And not just the committee chairman, but also lower-ranking officials, even under threat of dismissal. They are obliged to find ways to report in person or to hand over materials through trusted contacts, as some Russian war correspondents are currently doing.
        1. -3
          26 February 2026 13: 33
          Ha, should I report to him that he is preparing a counter-revolution?
          1. +3
            26 February 2026 13: 38
            tatra, to report that his policies could lead to the collapse of the Union, and that he personally could be left behind. Which is precisely what happened. Gorbachev was lucky – he was moved, preserving not only his life but also his pension. Things could have been worse. But the country was not so lucky.
            1. -3
              26 February 2026 13: 40
              He himself gave freedom to the separatist People's Fronts in the national republics of the USSR, so what should we warn him about if he did it intentionally?
              1. +1
                26 February 2026 13: 49
                tatraI wrote it—to warn of the threat not only to the country but to him personally. To scare him, so to speak. If the State Emergency Committee had succeeded, a trial could have followed after some time. Besides, historians (including those of leftist persuasion) aren't certain that Gorbachev deliberately ruined everything. The fact that he openly enjoyed the overtures from Western leaders doesn't prove anything.
                1. -4
                  26 February 2026 13: 54
                  Yes, as soon as he gave the USSR's enemies freedom to do whatever they wanted, it was already clear how it would all end.
                  He himself wanted to destroy socialism and the power of the CPSU, and continue to rule the pro-Western capitalist State.
                  And the enemies of the USSR “liberated” by him were mental separatists, and wanted to get rich by robbing the country and the people, to gain freedom of impunity and irresponsibility.
                  Well, the logical result is that they, de facto, overthrew him.
                  1. -1
                    26 February 2026 13: 57
                    Quote: tatra
                    the enemies of the USSR "liberated" by him were mental separatists

                    More like latent winked
                  2. +1
                    26 February 2026 16: 42
                    Quote: tatra
                    mental

                    At least master the Russian language first...
                2. 0
                  26 February 2026 16: 41
                  Quote: MBRBS
                  warn about the threat not only to the country, but also to him personally.

                  My dissertation cites a fact about how, during the 10th Five-Year Plan, the Komsomol Central Committee reported to the CPSU Central Committee that the level of student research and development (R&D) at Central Asian universities exceeded... 100%. The national average was 5-7%. Yet, R&D funds were allocated. The response in the document was: "The East is a delicate matter... let's not dwell on it for now." Gorbachev wasn't in power back then, was he? And what does this memo suggest? That the "allies" were simply... bought off, like women of low social responsibility, and that's what held the fraternal alliance together. And the socialist camp, by the way, did too.
                  1. +4
                    26 February 2026 16: 48
                    kalibr In fact, we even buy our wives, figuratively speaking. Some with attention and affection, others with high social status, so she'll feel "safe behind a stone wall." Isn't that right? So it's better to "buy" an ally than to see them join the enemy. But buying also requires skill, something the current government seems to have failed to master.
                    1. 0
                      26 February 2026 16: 49
                      Quote: MBRBS
                      But you also need to know how to buy,

                      That's exactly it: YOU NEED TO... KNOW HOW TO DO EVERYTHING!
  26. +2
    26 February 2026 13: 12
    The article was very surprising in its primitive interpretation of both the essence of the agency's activities and the discrepancy between its content and the title.
    Unfortunately, I don't see the possibility of parsing such a low-quality article into sections and individual conclusions due to the complete amateurishness of its content, and doing so based on individual facts is pointless...
    The topic is very comprehensive and interesting, but it has not been fully explored.
  27. +1
    26 February 2026 13: 55
    Why couldn't the KGB save the USSR?

    The KGB was prohibited from working against the top brass of the USSR and the Union republics.
  28. +2
    26 February 2026 14: 11
    Why couldn't the KGB save the USSR?

    Did he try?
    1. +1
      26 February 2026 20: 52
      Quote: Karabin
      Why couldn't the KGB save the USSR?

      Did he try?

      Take an interest in the personalities of Pitovranov, Bobkov, Gvishiani - and you will be happy.
  29. +1
    26 February 2026 15: 36
    Quote: Alexey RA
    It is somehow doubtful that a currency prostitute taught at the Higher Party School under the Central Committee of the Communist Party of Lithuania and at the Moscow Academy of Social Sciences under the Central Committee of the CPSU.

    It's definitely not a foreign currency payment; they paid in rubles there...
  30. 0
    26 February 2026 16: 46
    bully Alexander Petrovich Shevyakin's book "Who Prepared the Collapse of the USSR" provides a comprehensive answer to this question.
    1. +2
      26 February 2026 20: 55
      These "foremen" of perestroika were chosen by him, sent to study in Austria and supervised by the KGB.
      Any questions?
      1. 0
        2 March 2026 10: 58
        No questions. The book I mentioned completely agrees with you and covers the whole picture long before these "foremen"
  31. The comment was deleted.
  32. +2
    26 February 2026 20: 24
    Quote: Monster_Fat
    Read and listen to Fyodor Razzakov: "From the Deep Security Service to the Deep KGB"...

    Let them not read anything and listen to anyone...
    1. 0
      26 February 2026 20: 34
      Quote: Silhouette
      Quote: Monster_Fat
      Read and listen to Fyodor Razzakov: "From the Deep Security Service to the Deep KGB"...

      Let them not read anything and listen to anyone...

      Is it worth reading?
      1. +1
        26 February 2026 20: 41
        Definitely. At least to have my own opinion.
        1. 0
          26 February 2026 20: 42
          Quote: Silhouette
          Definitely

          Thanks, I will look.

          Quote: Silhouette
          to have my own opinion

          I don't get it. I already have an opinion. And the person you were responding to who recommended it is a pretty shady character, so I asked again – is it worth it?
          1. 0
            26 February 2026 20: 45
            There's a lot of Razzakov on YouTube. You can listen to him.
            1. 0
              26 February 2026 20: 45
              Quote: Silhouette
              There is a lot of Razzakov on YouTube

              I've already seen it. I'll read it better, it will come out faster. Thanks. Yes
  33. 0
    26 February 2026 23: 55
    Quote: a.shlidt
    Someone will always want to live better than others.

    The question is what does "better" mean? It's always different for different people.
  34. +1
    27 February 2026 06: 42
    Did that Committee want to save the USSR?
    (Was it legally possible and it doesn’t matter when it’s possible to simply eliminate Gorabchev-Yeltsin and others.)
    Didn't he, on the contrary, lead/support the course of destruction?

    Let's take the SBU as an example some time later.
    They could have saved Ukraine, but they supported the Maidan and so on.
  35. +1
    27 February 2026 08: 38
    Why? Because you can't solder microchips with a hammer, much less design them. The KGB was an instrument that had nothing to do with the state system. That's the first thing.
    And secondly. At that time, the USSR lacked an understanding of the fundamental problems of the system and the country, much less knew how to put everything in order. The main question for intelligence agencies was: what exactly should we look for? Once we understand this, everything can be found. The main question for solving major problems was: what's going on? Where exactly is the problem? Such an understanding simply didn't exist in the USSR. Losev, the mathematician, was killed, and without him, Andropov became blind again...
    1. +1
      1 March 2026 20: 55
      But read the nonsense of Abalkin and Aganbegyan. From a political economy perspective, they were talking complete nonsense, but Gorbachev liked it. And the result: he ruined the country in four years.
      Now Nabiullina professes incorrect views that she let slip seven days ago.
      1. 0
        2 March 2026 06: 45
        This is the problem that, in fact, led to the collapse of the USSR: the loss of "quality," competence, and management techniques at the top of the country. Stalin failed to build a system that would reproduce the elite. As a result, the elite became increasingly corrupted, contaminated by useless power-hungry individuals and, paradoxically, by downright lazy people.
        Socialism is a system capable of miracles and fantastic achievements. But socialist development must be led by true geniuses, leaders of the highest caliber. In fact, that's exactly how it was designed—to continually seek out the very best among ALL people. And to allow the very best to fully develop, while giving the rest the opportunity to develop as much as they can.
        This task was a complete failure. Socialism is currently humanity's highest achievement in the management of all processes. But we failed to build it...
  36. 0
    27 February 2026 18: 38
    Because I was ready to give a kick in the pants from the citadel of freedom)) and how many foreign intelligence agents were hanging out there, my God
  37. +1
    27 February 2026 18: 45
    The KGB no longer had any real enemies: the White Guards, Basmachi, and Nazis in the Baltics and Ukraine had already been defeated.

    Well, well)) At my school, my history teacher was a member of Sajudis, a rather nice old man named Petras Antanovich, and the gym teacher was also a Šaulist, by the way, he also taught us NVP.
  38. 0
    27 February 2026 19: 55
    The Union collapsed primarily due to economic problems. What could the KGB do? Economic policy was conducted by the Council of Ministers and the Party Central Committee, and the committee reported to them. It's "the cart before the horse" these days; times were different back then.
  39. 0
    28 February 2026 07: 19
    There is a photo in the title.
    And there is a photo under "The KGB leadership building on Lubyanka in 1985"

    What does "on Lubyanka" mean?
    Street, square, alley, dead end, passage, popular print, pubic area...

    It was as if no one had time to read the scribbles and distribute them.
  40. 0
    1 March 2026 13: 18
    And so, with a single stroke of the pen, Mr. Samsonov transformed an organization feared by the entire world into a cesspool. The Unified State Exam generation now knows everything. Bravo, Maestro!
    The most terrifying thing is that the Guarantor has built his vertical power structure from people like Samsonov. And from Grefs, Medinskys, Volodins, Peskovs, Nabiullinas, Golikovs, and all that other scum that is finishing off Russia and destroying Russians.
    Were we expecting something different in 2022? Expecting a cleansing? Believing in a miracle? In Russia's rebirth? Naive...
  41. +1
    1 March 2026 20: 52
    The author's idea isn't new, but it's presented vividly and clearly. But if you think this only happened in the USSR, you're wrong. Discriminating between capitalism and communism is forbidden in Russia. Write an honest analysis of any situation and be glad you weren't jailed for extremism.
    .
    Here, the truth is called slander. Theirs isn't an admission of half the trouble, but rather a directive on what needs to be addressed. Institutes and think tanks convey their analysis to the authorities. Our institutions substantiate the authorities' opinions. Do you see the difference?
    .
    To make the right decisions, you need to have information. You need to have three or four independent channels and not allow them to collude. For example, in the army under Stalin, there was a command line, there were political reports from commissars, there were reports from special officers, and even party cells sent their protocols up the chain of command... It was harder to lie than it is today... there were representatives of the General Headquarters at the front and private military units in every unit.

    .
    The problem isn't the FSB. Someone is simply afraid of the control system, just as Nicholas II was afraid to even have a personal secretary.
  42. 0
    7 March 2026 08: 21
    Warriors are fighting!
    "With a shield or on a shield!!!"
    By the early 90s, the KGB had become a "pig farm." Warm, bright, cozy, and not bitten by flies... The equivalent of "businessmen."
    There were so many proposals from veterans: bring back the KGB. But Putin immediately thinks of diapers, not to be confused with lombas.
    For clarity, remember how many times People approached him directly about returning STALINGRAD to the hero city?????
  43. 0
    7 March 2026 20: 32
    This is all because the KGB was under the complete control of the Central Committee of the Party, whose leadership had completely degenerated ideologically and morally.