Repel and Attack: Iran's Capabilities in a Conflict with the US

12 695 16
Repel and Attack: Iran's Capabilities in a Conflict with the US
Khyber Shekan ballistic missile system rocket at a public event


The United States is amassing forces in the Middle East and is apparently preparing an attack on Iran. Meanwhile, the Islamic Republic's armed forces are preparing for possible aggression. A variety of assets and weapons, operating on land, at sea, and in the air, could be used to repel it. Their competent and comprehensive use would, at a minimum, disrupt the actions of a potential adversary or even discourage them from making rash moves.



The attacking side


According to available data, the United States is deploying forces and assets from various branches of the armed forces and combat arms to the Middle East. A fully-fledged joint force capable of conducting combat operations in all environments is being formed. Some details of this force have now become known from open publications and official statements.

Thus, one carrier strike group has been deployed to the Persian Gulf. Another is en route. The two groups include a pair of aircraft carriers with several dozen aircraft and helicopters. The carrier strike group also includes cruisers and destroyers armed with guided missiles, strike and anti-aircraft weapons. They are apparently accompanied by submarines, including those carrying cruise missiles.

Additional tactical air force units are being deployed to Middle Eastern air bases. aviationThey are equipped with various types of equipment, with a particular emphasis on modern F-35 fighter-bombers. This points to some peculiarities of the hypothetical airstrikes.


The Shahid Soleimani missile ship

There are also reports of a reinforcement of the American ground force. Of particular interest in this context is the possible deployment of additional air and missile defense systems. The US intends to protect its bases from Iranian missiles.

It's still unknown when exactly the operation against Iran might begin. Its possible design, the forces and resources allocated, and other specifics are also uncertain. However, it can be assumed that the Pentagon is planning full-scale strikes involving a combined force.

Naval defense


Iran's first lines of defense are located far from its territory—at sea. Using a variety of weapons, Iran can and must attack and destroy enemy forces far from its shores. This could have consequences beyond just military ones.

For years, Iranian command has been threatening to use naval mines in a crisis. Minefields could be deployed in various areas. The Strait of Hormuz, which connects the Persian Gulf and the Gulf of Oman, is the most prominent example. According to foreign estimates, the Iranian Navy could deploy approximately 5-6 mines. They would be laid by surface vessels and small submarines of various types.


Production of Fateh-110 missiles

Naval mines are intended to pose a threat to enemy ships. Enemy fleet will not be able to operate freely in certain areas. Furthermore, commercial shipping in the region will be effectively blocked. Inspecting and clearing potentially dangerous areas will require time and resources.

Iran also has the capability to attack enemy ships and vessels using anti-ship missiles. It has a wide range of such weapons with varying characteristics. Anti-ship missiles are used in coastal missile systems, on ships and boats, and on aircraft. According to various estimates, the Iranian armed forces can, at a minimum, employ up to several hundred missiles, which is sufficient to inflict significant damage on any naval group of a potential enemy.

Subsonic anti-ship missiles with a range of at least 250-300 km, such as the Noor, Kovsar, and Nasr, are widely available. An interesting development is the Khaleej-e Fars anti-ship ballistic missile, based on the Fateh-110 land-based munition. It is capable of striking targets at ranges of up to 300 km. Its characteristic trajectory and high impact velocity provide excellent combat performance.

Attack UAVs of various models can also be used to engage surface targets. Iran has been actively developing this capability and, according to various reports, is now capable of organizing massive air strikes using a range of aircraft types. Furthermore, UAVs can operate in conjunction with anti-ship missiles, which should overload Defense enemy and increase the likelihood of a successful breakthrough.


Reconnaissance and strike UAV "Ababil-2"

The Navy's submarine forces can contribute to the fight against maritime targets. They include several types of diesel-electric submarines. The core of these forces is three Russian-built Project 877 submarines. Iran has also built a fairly large fleet of small submarines. All such submarines carry torpedoes and can attack enemy ships and submarines.

Air defense


It's clear that at the outset of their operation, the United States will launch a massive strike using a wide range of airborne attack weapons. This will involve various types of cruise missiles, as well as aircraft and their weapons. Such an initial strike will be aimed at destroying the primary detection assets, command posts, and critical infrastructure of the Iranian armed forces.

Iran is aware of such threats and has long been preparing to counter them. It has now built a comprehensive and sophisticated air defense system. It comprises systems and components of its own design, as well as various imported models. Systems of all classes are represented, from short-range weapons to long-range missiles. Furthermore, a network of radars has been created to monitor the situation in dangerous regions, and communication and command and control systems have been deployed.

Target detection is carried out by various types of radars, from early warning systems to the radars installed on air defense missile systems. For example, fixed radars such as the Sepehr and Kadir are designed to detect air threats at ranges of 1000-1100 km. Depending on their type, anti-aircraft radars detect aerial targets at ranges of tens or hundreds of kilometers. Various electronic reconnaissance and passive location systems are also available.


Radar "Kadir"

There is also a layered interception system based on various missile and artillery systems and complexes. For example, targets at ranges of up to 250-300 km are engaged by the Russian-made S-300PMU2 and Iranian-made Bavar-373 systems. There are also a number of locally developed long- and medium-range air defense systems. The final line of air defense is artillery systems of various calibers and MANPADS, also widely represented in the troops.

Fighter aircraft should make some contribution to air defense. However, for obvious reasons, Iran cannot boast a large modern fleet of aircraft. The newest fighters in the Air Force are the Su-35, purchased several years ago. However, their numbers are still small, limiting their combat effectiveness.

Riposte


The crises of recent years have demonstrated that Iran has every capability to launch retaliatory strikes against enemy targets within its region. It can respond to an attack with the massive use of ballistic and cruise missiles, as well as attack drones. Moreover, such capabilities have already been demonstrated in practice.

The missile forces are armed with a large number of systems of various classes, from tactical to medium-range. Hundreds of systems with different combat missions and assigned targets can be deployed simultaneously to launch sites across the country.


Iranian-developed Bavar-373 air defense missile system

Measures have been taken to protect missile systems from a first strike. A significant portion of them are housed in special underground structures. These tunnels and their exits are camouflaged, and decoys are deployed. All of this increases the likelihood of a successful response with the required quantitative indicators.

Using its existing missile systems, Iran can attack enemy targets up to 1500-2000 km from its borders. The ability to destroy various buildings and other objects has already been demonstrated. Iranian missiles may also be capable of striking hardened targets, including those buried underground.

Ready for an answer


Iran has been preparing to repel hypothetical American aggression since the late 1970s—a process that began almost immediately after the Islamic Revolution. Following this logic, in recent decades, the Iranian armed forces have developed or acquired a large number of diverse strike and defensive systems.

The situation in the region has deteriorated again, and the risk of a real conflict has resurfaced. Iran is prepared for such a scenario. Using its existing equipment, it can repel enemy attacks and inflict damage. Iranian command is counting on the US taking the existing threat into account and deeming such damage unacceptable. They will have to abandon their aggressive plans or face excessive losses.
16 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. 10+
    24 February 2026 04: 28
    The US has currently deployed two aircraft carriers and 15 guided missile destroyers to the region, presumably two nuclear-powered submarines—one Ohio-class with up to 154 Tomahawk cruise missiles—and 500 combat aircraft. A third strike group may be deployed based on the analysis of Iran's capabilities and the operation's planning. Trump is the only one boasting about the Americans; they are meticulously preparing for military operations.
    Naval mines are intended to pose a threat to enemy ships. The enemy fleet will be unable to operate freely in certain areas. ... Subsonic anti-ship missiles with a range of at least 250-300 km, such as the Noor, Kovsar, and Nasr, are widely available.

    The strike group won't get closer than 700-800 km to Iran, and the 2nd strike group is in the Mediterranean. Anti-ship ballistic missiles with a range of up to 1000 km are needed here—China could help, but will it? Iranian submarines simply won't catch the strike group, and the strike group will likely not enter the Persian Gulf for fear of missiles, drones, and those same small submarines.
  2. ayk
    -3
    24 February 2026 06: 26
    A ground operation is not planned. Therefore, the primary objective is to repel an air attack. The US can destroy any target on Iranian territory. Therefore, all efforts must be focused not on protecting these targets, but on inflicting maximum damage on the aggressor. In the event of strikes on critical facilities—power plants, oil and gas fields, and refineries—then strikes must be launched against the Persian Gulf countries where US military bases are located. As a last resort, the Strait of Hormuz must be closed.
    1. 0
      24 February 2026 15: 23
      a strike must be launched against the Persian Gulf countries where US military bases are located

      Yeah, as if the Persians didn't have enough problems. recourse
      1. ayk
        -1
        24 February 2026 15: 40
        The only way to survive is to threaten to cause a regional Armageddon.
        1. 0
          24 February 2026 15: 46
          Iran, no matter how much it wants, won't be able to cause this Armageddon; at most, it will destroy the infrastructure.
          Is it worth it? I don't think so. Iran isn't Israel; you can hit them back.
          1. ayk
            -1
            24 February 2026 15: 57
            If Iran's critical infrastructure is destroyed, it has nothing to lose. Then its Arab neighbors won't need their gas and oil fields and refineries.
          2. 0
            24 February 2026 23: 18
            Quote: Ermak_415
            Iran, no matter how much it wants, won't be able to create this Armageddon.

            As recently as 2023, Iran had uranium enriched to 84%. A bomb could already be made from 90% of the uranium...
  3. +5
    24 February 2026 06: 32
    Kirill, you didn't mention the losses from the previous attack on Iran - Israel and the USA.
    Is there anything to respond with after this?
    Too little time has passed for Iran to "learn its lessons."

    The motive of Israel and the United States now is to finish off what they failed to finish off last year.
    They are not giving Iran time to reconsider its tactics and strategy.

    Iran also has another quirk: preserving modern weapons for the future. This includes flying modern aircraft to remote airfields, forcing submarines into coastal bunkers, and so on.
    In this context, it is highly doubtful that the submarine and Su-35 will be used.
  4. +4
    24 February 2026 10: 17
    The most the Iranians can do is shoot down a certain number of missiles, unless their air defenses are completely blinded by a carefully planned strike. The prognosis for aircraft is also bleak, unless the Americans themselves lose a couple of planes during takeoff and landing. They have made significant advances in radar suppression technology, as we saw last year during the attack on Iran's nuclear facilities.
  5. +7
    24 February 2026 10: 18
    We have already seen the IDF and Iran exchanging strikes. And B-2s over Iran too.
    Therefore, the effectiveness of Iranian air defense, which did not shoot down a single IDF attack aircraft, is highly questionable.
  6. -3
    24 February 2026 11: 13
    The author is behind the times))) There are no guided missile cruisers in the AUG, and soon they will disappear altogether as a class. How long the Ford is stuck in the Court is certainly an interesting question))) Everything else has already been discussed more than once.
  7. +2
    24 February 2026 13: 23
    The Americans have the so-called ALE-50 system, which is integrated into the ALQ-184(V)9 electronic countermeasure module, which has been deployed on a wider range of platforms (F-15, F-18, etc.). It has been used extensively. There were articles here on VO, one very recently published, the other from 2012: https://topwar.ru/12650-buksiruemye-lozhnye-celi-raytheon-v-ale-50.html?ysclid=mm0gfljno8812431889
  8. +2
    24 February 2026 19: 10
    This article is reminiscent of recent articles about how and with what Venezuela will shoot down and sink American planes and ships. But we understand that this requires will and courage. Just like last time, I'd bet money on the Iranians screwing up.
    1. 0
      24 February 2026 20: 38
      Iran doesn't necessarily need to attack and sink American ships. Iran needs to attack Israel. There are other targets, too, like the American base in Qatar.
  9. +1
    24 February 2026 20: 13
    If Iran continues to meekly wait to be attacked, it will undoubtedly lose, as its weapons are designed for a preemptive, massive strike aimed, if not at destruction, then at least at leveling the playing field. Our "favorite counterattack," if this is not a lie, is a sure path to crushing defeat. Those striving for victory don't employ such tactics; they lay down harsh conditions, and if they are not met, they strike a surprise and devastating blow.
    1. The comment was deleted.
  10. +1
    25 February 2026 19: 36
    It seems the author is out of touch with last year's events. Iran's air defenses demonstrated the lack of a unified radar coverage system and operated in a targeted mode; long-range early warning is nonexistent. Naval forces will be destroyed or damaged in the first wave; the only remaining chance is the submarines, which will be operating in stealth mode at that time. Iran's mines are primarily designed to disrupt oil supplies, which, according to their calculations, should hurt the US economy. The Persians' main threat and hope are ballistic missiles and massive waves of UAVs. There will be no ground operation; the calculation is based on the loss of control by the security forces and the rise of separatist and opposition forces, supported by Israeli agents and special forces.