An attack on Iran – potential or real?

15 781 78
An attack on Iran – potential or real?

Without even taking into account everything that relates to the naval group fleet The US, heading somewhere towards Iran, looking at what is happening in the air, we can conclude that everything that is happening is part of some action that cannot yet be clearly defined: whether this will be the tragedy of Iran's conquest, or another circus tent.

A large contingent of US Air Force aircraft is heading to the Middle East to bolster existing forces there as US President Donald Trump considers attacking Iran. Online tracking shows F-22 Raptor fighters, F-16 Fighting Falcons, E-3 Sentry radar aircraft, and a U-2 Dragon Lady spy plane (my God, even this veteran is being put to work!) either crossing the Atlantic or have just arrived in Europe. Additionally, the seventh guided missile destroyer rocket weapons The Arleigh Burke-class submarine, the Pinkney, was recently deployed to the U.S. Central Command area of ​​responsibility.



As it is now being planned... but Trump is planning to terrorize the Iranians in a strange way.



Yes, two days ago, the Americans put on quite an impressive show in the skies for those following trackers. According to those monitoring the event, more than 30 F-16s, 15 F-35As, and a dozen F-22s of the oldest model participated, the deployment of which sparked quite a heated debate in American expert circles.

The purpose of these now-very-old aircraft's presence hasn't been clearly determined. In a previous article, I already ventured the notion that the Iranian Air Force won't engage in a "plane-on-plane" war, because neither their aircraft, nor, especially, their Iranian pilots, are entirely prepared for it.

Why ship them to the other side of the world, especially very old aircraft? There's only one answer: to have a reason to write them off! Let's face it, the US Air Force has been itching to quietly scrap the Raptors for a while now, because they pose no threat to anyone other than a budget blowout.


One hour of flight of the F-22 is almost equal to one hour of flight of the B-2, and the very complex and capricious design requires increased attention and maintenance, which is also easily measured in dollars.

Overall, the F-22's value is more than questionable, as demonstrated by the Raptors' impressive one-point victory record over the Chinese "balloon" bubble.

And so the F-22s are sent to war against Iran. It's profound, because the "pure" F-22 fighter, for which Iran has no rivals, looks like a clown in a circus arena during a weightlifting performance, given the presence of aircraft in the force that can handle not only the superiority functions of a fighter but also the duties of a bomber. And the F-35s can also show off.

But even with the flight something went wrong:
"Six fifth-generation F-22A Raptor fighters, departing the US mainland en route to Lakenheath Air Force Base in the UK, were forced to abort their flight and turn back. The reason was the abnormal condition of the tanker aircraft, which was supposed to provide in-flight refueling and effectively escort the group on the transatlantic leg of the flight. Furthermore, the condition of two aircraft in the group was a concern. Only half of the planned aircraft will be dispatched to the potential theater of operations."


Those guys from The War Zone, who we know, wrote this on "that very" social network... However, they'll all be banned soon, so it doesn't matter where they wrote it.

So, the tanker aircraft fell ill mid-flight and infected two Raptors. So it was decided to send all six back, presumably to prevent them from spreading the infection to others.

It just so happened that the Raptors once again failed to demonstrate their heroic prowess, but no matter, six more heroes will still have a chance to do so.

What about the rest?


The eastward flight of American aircraft proved to be a particularly intense phase of the overall buildup of forces that began after Trump began threatening Iran. Taken together, the forces currently amassing in the Middle East, combined with the capabilities of the Israeli Air Force, which includes hundreds of fighter jets, and US Air Force bombers based in the Middle East, capable of operating under the "global air power" concept, are sufficient to conduct a large-scale operation that could last not just days, but weeks.


A U.S. Air Force F-15E Strike Eagle assigned to the 391st Expeditionary Fighter Squadron is refueled by a KC-135 tanker.

At least 36 F-16 fighter jets are also deployed to the Middle East. According to available data, 12 of them are based at Aviano Air Base in Italy, 12 at Spangdahlem Air Base in Germany, and 12 at McEntire Joint National Guard Base in South Carolina.

These very aircraft, which are much better than the Raptors (and cheaper), can be used for defense against drones and air-to-air or air-to-ground missiles. The US Air Force already has a number of F-16 fighters in the Middle East, so this detachment clearly serves as a reinforcement for existing forces.


Two E-3 Sentry airborne early warning and control (AEW&C) aircraft have landed at Mildenhall Air Force Base in the UK, as we have already reported, and there is no doubt that their next destination will be the Middle East.

With all-round radar, advanced communications, and passive sensors, these aircraft will play a critical role in managing allied air battles and tracking Iranian threats, particularly, as the Americans themselves believe, drones and cruise missiles.


An E-3 Sentry airborne early warning and control aircraft, call sign DENALI01, lands at RAF Mildenhall in the UK.

In addition, at least one U-2 Dragon Lady reconnaissance aircraft is being deployed to the region.



The U-2 can conduct high-altitude surveillance and also serve as a communications link between F-22 and F-35 Lightning II stealth fighters. The presence of this veteran is difficult to explain, especially given the presence of several E-3s, which are far more capable than the older aircraft, whose primary function was photo reconnaissance, a task far better handled by satellites today.


Eighteen F-35A Lightning II stealth fighters took off from Lakenheath Air Force Base in the UK and flew to Muwaffaq Salti in central Jordan, which has become a central hub for US tactical fighters and other aircraft, as in Operation Midnight Strike.

These deployments follow previous movements of F-35A Lighting II fighters, F-15E Strike Eagles, E/A-18G Growlers, and other aircraft to Muwaffaq Salti, where they joined aircraft already stationed there, including close air support aircraft. aviation A-10 Thunderbolt II support.


MQ-9 Reaper drones, MC-130 special operations aircraft, and other American assets promoting peace and democracy are also stationed there. With the Prince Sultan Air Base in Saudi Arabia becoming increasingly overcrowded, all these forces are being redeployed to Muwaffaq Salti, despite Amman's claims that it will not allow its airspace to be used for strikes against Iran.

It's possible, however, that Jordan made this statement for a domestic audience that fears war with Iran, especially if it means they would have to fight on Israel's side. A retaliatory strike by Iranian missile forces is entirely possible, and experience has shown that "all the king's horse and all the king's men" are incapable of repelling such an attack.

At sea, with the arrival of the Pinkney, the US Navy now has 12 surface combatants in the region, including a strike group consisting of the aircraft carrier USS Abraham Lincoln and three Arleigh Burke-class destroyers, three Arleigh Burke-class ships independently deployed in the US Central Command region, and two more in the Mediterranean. There are also three Littoral Combat Ships (LCS), which are also currently in the US Central Command area of ​​responsibility. There are also nuclear submarines, at least one of which is statutorily assigned to accompany each carrier strike group. Cruise missile submarines (SSGNs) are also possible, but their presence has not yet been disclosed.


Arleigh Burke-class destroyer USS Pinkney

Additionally, the Gerald R. Ford carrier strike group is currently in the 6th Fleet's area of ​​responsibility. The carrier and its three Arleigh Burke-class escort ships, under Trump's orders, departed the Caribbean for the Middle East, where they participated in the operation to capture Venezuelan President Maduro.

Having two aircraft carriers with F/A-18E-F Super Hornets and EA-18G Growlers, and one carrier with F-35C fighters, escorted by Aegis-equipped destroyers and missiles, significantly increases mobile firepower, enhancing planning flexibility.


The aircraft carrier USS Gerald R. Ford and part of its strike group are heading to the Middle East..

Intelligent Management of the Strait of Hormuz


As the US builds up its forces, the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) closed the Strait of Hormuz for live-fire exercises. This is the first time Iran has closed part of the strait since Trump threatened military action against Iran in January.


The exercise, dubbed "Intelligent Governance of the Strait of Hormuz," began on Monday. It includes firing anti-ship cruise missiles at targets, as well as operations involving maritime drones and IRGC Navy submarines, conducted from three of the five Iranian islands where the IRGC maintains bases.

"The armed drones used in the exercises, capable of striking both air and sea targets, are among the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps's newest strategic platforms. They are widely used, although their names and technical specifications remain classified," claims the official Iranian publication FARS News.

A spokesman for US Central Command, which has previously warned against Iranian actions in the Strait of Hormuz, declined to comment on Tuesday.

On Tuesday morning, Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei issued a warning to American warships. The warning was immediately labeled a threat by those on the other side, but how does a threat differ from a warning? Only in the possibility of its execution.

"We keep hearing that they've sent a warship to the shores of Iran," Khamenei said. "A warship is certainly a dangerous weapon, but a weapon capable of sinking it is even more dangerous."

The Iranian leader did not specify what kind of weapons he was talking about, but the point is that Iran currently has more than enough of such weapons.


Negotiations in Switzerland


Meanwhile, while both sides continue to rattle their sabres, indirect talks in Switzerland, brokered by Oman, concluded on Tuesday with an agreement on a "set of guidelines," according to Iran's Foreign Minister. Abbas Araghchi stated that both sides had agreed to exchange drafts of a possible deal. However, Araghchi "was as positive as he was evasive, not providing details about what was discussed or when the next round of talks might take place," as The New York Times noted.

Araghchi told Iranian state television that the talks were "more constructive" and made "good progress" compared to the previous round of talks in Oman this month.

However, there remains a wide gap between Washington and Tehran over what the future should be. Trump does not want Iran to have nuclear weapons or the ability to develop them, while Araghchi "stressed that Iran's right to use nuclear energy for peaceful purposes is inalienable, non-negotiable, and legally binding," he said in response to a question from the official Iranian news agency IRNA.

In an interview with Fox News on Tuesday, US Ambassador to NATO Matt Whitaker said the Trump administration is open to negotiations, but noted that Trump told reporters on Air Force One on Monday that "it would be a very bad day for Iran" if it decided not to reach an agreement.

While these negotiations may move to the next round, it is worth remembering that three days before the "Midnight Strike," the White House said Trump would make a decision "within two weeks" on whether to strike or continue negotiations.

Of course, there are already so many guns hanging on the walls of the Middle East theater that at least one will fire. The observed buildup of US air and naval forces in the region gives Trump more options and, most importantly, increases the likelihood that an attack will inflict serious damage on the Iranian regime, which could play a significant role in the negotiations. However, Iran's capabilities should not be overlooked.

The point is that we seem to be seeing the formation of the exact force composition that could be expected in the event of a large-scale air campaign against Iran, especially if Israel intends to play a leading role in it, using all its resources. But the manner in which this is being done is still highly questionable. There's a certain element of frivolity in what the United States is doing. These are ancient reconnaissance aircraft, first-generation Raptors, on their last legs... It really doesn't seem very serious, it's artificial. Which, however, doesn't diminish the capabilities of the newly created group.
78 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. -9
    21 February 2026 02: 58
    Most likely, everything will end in a fizzle (not to be confused with a pshek) laughing
    1. +3
      21 February 2026 06: 34
      Quote: pudelartemon
      everything will end in fizzle

      The US has the successful example of Syria right before its eyes. And even earlier, Yugoslavia. Plus the recent experience of last year's bombings.
      Everything is exactly the same.
      Protests coordinated via Starlink, sanctions for suppression, democratic rebels from the same Kurds and other Baloch who are promised independence and freedom. All this is supported by periodic precision air strikes and missiles against military personnel and headquarters, the remote killing of commanders and leaders, and the destruction of infrastructure.
      A decade of bloody chaos and voila, Prince Pahlavi will once again be at the helm of a democratic Iran. Look at him, he's already stamping his feet.
      Previously, the idea that Iran was crazy and had a lot of missiles and could really cause Armageddon in the Persian Gulf stopped me.
      What if they end up where they shouldn't?
      But based on the experience of the last three years and last year's bombing, the Americans and Jews apparently have the feeling that the Persians are actually rather soft...
      The ayatollahs spent colossal sums on the armed forces, undermining the country's economy. Fear of an external war has led them to a de facto internal war—a war against their own population, condemned to poverty and lack of prospects. And having built an army, they are afraid to use it to defend against an immediate threat, which they themselves have loudly declared to be a direct enemy of their state.
      The ayatollahs' rhetoric may be as menacing as they like, but they are not prepared to use military force against their own survival, as this would jeopardize their personal security.
      1. +2
        21 February 2026 10: 48
        Protests coordinated via Starlink, sanctions for suppression, democratic rebels from the same Kurds and other Baloch who are promised independence and freedom. All this is supported by periodic precision air strikes and missiles against military personnel and headquarters, the remote killing of commanders and leaders, and the destruction of infrastructure.

        I guess this is what you would call a special military operation, right?
        1. +5
          21 February 2026 17: 15
          This is the real SVO.
          And not this, we haven’t started, which has been going on for 4+ years, and could continue for another 4+ years, in the style of the First World War.
    2. + 11
      21 February 2026 06: 41
      Would you ship a hell of a lot of equipment and other stuff across half the world for nothing, burning millions of dollars in engines?
      No, they will definitely attack, absolutely, because:
      1. practice the concept of a disarming strike
      2. Last time they did it absolutely painlessly and so as not to repeat it
      3. They will trample into the dust all who dare to resist and will make an example of them.
      4. So as not to go twice, then they will roll out Yemen
      5. They will once again "pee on China's shoe."
      6. Generals want to add "new orders"
      7. We have the Ministry of Defense, they have the Ministry of War. Don't confuse their thinking with yours.
      8. Theft and plunder are in the US's DNA. It's a country of the worst, but also the most adaptable, where survival, the possession of weapons, the acquisition of material goods, and the exploitation of some people by others are elevated to absolutes. They have an ideology of the "American Dream," unlike many countries that lack ideology altogether. And a small war to unleash this overpowered power, so that dreams come true and ideology is maintained... is perfectly appropriate. No need to construct moral constructs here; throw them in the trash already; they're not living beings.
      1. +2
        21 February 2026 13: 20
        Quote: Last centurion
        No, they will definitely attack, absolutely, because:

        They've removed their bases in Syria from attack. For me, this may be the most important marker. They'll definitely attack.
    3. +2
      21 February 2026 17: 11
      A fizzle, like in Venezuela? It turned out pretty good...
  2. +3
    21 February 2026 04: 46
    Roman, maybe you're not aware. But Europe is full of NATO E3s. And U2 is there too. Well, at least for the last 45 years, for sure.
    And yes, of course, absolutely all F-types require refueling (2-3) from the KC135 when flying over the Atlantic.
    It's clear that people have to pay their bills. But why churn out articles about "nothing"? Our infamous "printing press" is working just as fast.
  3. +4
    21 February 2026 05: 22
    Trump is most concerned about his own losses on the upcoming voyage. This could impact his future. And he faces the question of how to justify these losses. This requires an aggressive move by Iran. But Iran is behaving with dignity and not falling for provocations.
    1. GMV
      +1
      21 February 2026 12: 43
      I suspect Trump isn't the only one worried. Those behind him are also interested in resolving the Israeli issue of eliminating Iran's nuclear potential. And, at the same time, in the collapse of the Great Silk Road plans, which would mitigate trade difficulties under the threat to maritime transport from US and British lawlessness in international waters. So, the staff has been given the briefing. Now is the most opportune moment. After our joint military operation is completed, Russia will be able to supply Iran with air defenses sufficient to protect it from bandits.
    2. 0
      21 February 2026 19: 32
      Quote: Nikolay Malyugin
      This requires an aggressive move by Iran.

      He'd somehow managed without Iran's moves before. Last year's success with zero aircraft losses will be encouraging; there's no need to worry about any losses.
  4. +1
    21 February 2026 05: 57
    To think Trumpushka is sane is to be even more insane. The Peace Prize was a failure; he needs to leave his mark on world history. At least in the US, the gilded walls and the White House ballroom are a case in point.
  5. -6
    21 February 2026 06: 06
    The war has been going on for a long time. The only question is how to complete those phases that achieve political goals. Let me clarify: World War III ended with the destruction of the USSR! Now World War IV is beginning and continuing. Sure, Iran seems far away from us, but in fact, it's a direct threat to everyone from the Americans and the British. Frankly, our role in this matter is precisely that of an arena worker... we don't decide anything here!
  6. +3
    21 February 2026 06: 23
    Quote: igorra
    To think that Trumpushka is adequate is to be even more inadequate.

    Well, Maduro is sitting in handcuffs in a Washington prison... request So Trump is quite adequate.
    Rather, he is an adventurer like Skorzeny... who managed to get Mussolini out of an Italian prison.
    1. +4
      21 February 2026 13: 25
      Quote: The same LYOKHA
      He's more of an adventurer.

      He's hardly an adventurer—those types end badly in the long run—but he lived to his full age and built his own, far from small, business. He's a smart and calculating politician; he simply figured out that all the leaders these days are weaklings, and he's taking advantage of that. Why compromise when the other side is bending over backwards? Unfortunately, I don't see anyone like him today.
      1. +1
        21 February 2026 19: 34
        Quote: qqqq
        he just figured that now all the leaders are wimps and he's taking advantage of that

        He didn't calculate that his predecessors had worked for decades to ensure that in other countries, it was the weaklings who got to the top, not the Stalin-Napoleons.
  7. 0
    21 February 2026 06: 40
    While the ayatollahs are quietly "wetting their pants," the US is calmly deploying naval units, aircraft, anti-missile systems, and logistics for a strike.
    1. +1
      21 February 2026 07: 41
      They're not going anywhere. They weren't afraid, but crushed the pro-American rebellion, leaving countless activists lying forever in plastic bags. A country of a million square kilometers, and 92 million people. Without a ground operation, overthrowing the regime is impossible. Yes, they'll deal a powerful blow to air defenses and installations. They'll destroy some things. But the fight must be done with boots on the ground, and they certainly won't send us out.
      1. +4
        21 February 2026 14: 24
        Perhaps the top brass will be physically eliminated, and the middle class will bend to an external player in the struggle for power. The population there also does not want to die for the ayatollahs; the scale and frequency of protests over the past 10 years clearly demonstrate this. The second demographic transition has occurred since the 1970s, and the urban population is not the villagers who brought the ayatollahs to power in the 1970s; now they want a free society and access to European markets and products.
        1. -3
          21 February 2026 14: 29
          There's a power struggle there, of course, but hatred for the US and, naturally, Israel is far stronger than clan squabbles. No one wants the fate of Iraq, Libya, Ukraine, Yugoslavia, and the like. Wherever there's a pro-American regime, the neutralization of the previous regime immediately begins. Do you really think anyone will leave them alive? No. Therefore, they will fight to the end. And it's unclear which country is more united: the divided US or today's Iran.
          1. +3
            21 February 2026 14: 32
            You have a strange idea of ​​Iranian society; there are very few fanatics there, and the examples of Iraq and Syria show that the middle class, having joined the US in time, remained in power.
            1. -3
              21 February 2026 14: 33
              The examples of Iraq, Syria, and Libya are examples of completely destroyed states and societies. They are barely recovering from the American overthrow of their governments.
              1. +3
                21 February 2026 14: 37
                Iraq is doing quite well, compared to Egypt. Syria was unlucky, as Turkey, Iran, Russia, the US, and the EU intervened. Libya is the only example that fits your point. And don't forget about human psychology: everyone is confident they'll succeed, unlike their stupid neighbors.
                1. -3
                  21 February 2026 14: 44
                  Iraq, not bad!! The state was destroyed there. Syria was in ruins for over ten years due to a pro-American regime. Nonsense. Iran has already become seasoned in the struggle against both internal enemies (several bloody uprisings were suppressed) and, even more so, external ones. After 1979 (the hostage taking at the American embassy), the US and Israel attacked Iran many times. It didn't work. And it won't work this time. Iran has become stronger now.
                  1. +5
                    21 February 2026 20: 14
                    Do you have anything besides slogans? Iraq's standard of living is now on par with Egypt, which was never invaded, by all indicators. Syria, now that essentially only one player remains, will quickly recover. Libya, yes, is in utter ruin, but there's more of an internal conflict between tribes there, and it will likely end up with several states. Iran has numerous internal problems: massive inflation, at 30% annually for the last four years, declining living standards, numerous protests, which have led to numerous relaxations of religious pressure on the population by the ayatollahs, which have been going on there steadily for the last ten years. And don't refer to 1970; since then, urbanization has risen from 35 to 75 percent, and city dwellers are refusing to accept the loss of running water, electricity, or a complete blockade by the EU, with which they actively traded and studied until 2013. Rural residents who are ready to endure any hardships and who made the revolution in the 70s are already a minority.
                    1. 0
                      22 February 2026 18: 22
                      What slogans? The slogans will be yours if the Americans fail to overthrow the Iranian regime. And I'm 100% certain they won't. Iran has become a powerful economy—military-industrial complex, equipment manufacturing, gas turbines, but especially petrochemicals, where, unlike our import substitution, they've built dozens of hydrocarbon processing plants. And inflation is a pure consequence of sanctions, the rising cost of imported goods.
                      1. +1
                        23 February 2026 14: 59
                        Where do such fanatics come from? Have you ever read anything other than patriotic news about Iran? You live in a rosy fantasy world.
                      2. 0
                        23 February 2026 15: 18
                        What fanatics! You're more of a fanatic, thinking that the Americans, after Vietnam and Afghanistan, can achieve anything in Iran—a state they should have torn apart long ago. After all, unlike Iraq and Venezuela, the Persians really stepped on their toes—hostage taking, the hijacking of a USS, and much more, including a botched hostage rescue operation. But it didn't work. And it won't work this time. And it's too bad you have no arguments, or they're weak, and you resort to insults.
                      3. +1
                        23 February 2026 15: 35
                        I'm citing arguments about the state of the economy, the changing population structure, the constant protests, the cessation of cooperation with the EU since 2013, when UN sanctions were imposed. All you have are slogans about how everyone will rise up to defend the homeland, how they seized unarmed people in the embassy 40 years ago—what's heroic about that, by the way? Last year's operation demonstrated the inadequacy of their air defense system, the failure of their internal security. The only thing that actually worked was ballistic missiles. Israel successfully crushed all their proxy forces over the past year. Where is your great Iran? In fact, there's nothing but loud statements.
                      4. 0
                        23 February 2026 15: 44
                        I'm giving you arguments based on the state of the economy.
                        The economy there is growing, especially industry.
                        Last year's operation demonstrated the inadequacy of their air defense system,
                        So what? They'll crush the air defenses this time, too, but they won't topple the regime.
                        Ballistic missiles
                        Without a ground operation they will achieve nothing.
                        changes in population structure
                        In 1990, Iran had 60 million, and now it's 93 million. So much for the structure! Let's compare it to Russia: in 90, it was 148 million, and now it's 146 or 147 million.
                      5. +1
                        23 February 2026 17: 30
                        If you consider inflation at nearly 50% to be economic growth, then I have nothing to say. The lack of air defense will allow all power plants, industrial clusters, ports, and socially important facilities to be destroyed, which will throw the country back to the 19th century. If that's a success for you, then I have nothing to say. Population structure is the distribution between urban and rural residents, not their numbers. At the time of the revolution, 32% of the population was urban, hence the 6 births per woman and the willingness of the majority of the population to tolerate the lack of electricity and water. Now, we've already reached the second demographic transition, with 77% of the population urban by 2024, and a fertility rate of 1.9, i.e., like in any other developed country, below replacement level. If you don't understand this, then I have nothing to say. Conclusion: it's fashionable to indulge in fantasies, imagining Iran as a bastion of resistance to the United States, where every citizen is selflessly devoted to the ideals of the Islamic Revolution, where a highly developed industry and an indestructible state exist. But it's fashionable to look objectively: Iran is a fairly developed country with profound domestic political problems. The elite still think in terms of the times of the Islamic Revolution, and the population has become urban and wants more freedoms and less regulation of private life. Compared to the United States, the army, navy, and air force are very weak, proxy forces are practically crushed, and their influence in neighboring countries is undermined. Yes, they may bite back, but they can withstand a serious approach. If the United States and Israel decide to press on, regardless of the cost, they will collapse.
                      6. 0
                        23 February 2026 21: 16
                        77% of the urban population by 2024, and a birth rate of 1.9, i.e., like in any other developed country, below replacement level, if you don’t understand this, then I have nothing to say.
                        Just one question? Why has Iran's population grown by 33 million in 36 years, while here, with "minor inflation," we're experiencing stagnation at best.
                        and the population has become urban and wants more freedoms
                        US mercenaries want freedom and are provoking others, but they are being actively packaged in black plastic bags. You've written a lot here. And by March 31 (the Xi Jinping meeting with Trump), we will know for sure whether they will overthrow the regime in Iran or not. I think they'll bomb it and be done with it (as they have done before). Regime change requires boots on the ground. They certainly won't go for that.
                      7. WIS
                        0
                        23 February 2026 21: 23
                        Quote: Victor19
                        To change the regime, you need boots on the ground. They definitely won't do that.

                        Sorry for butting in, but I remember Biden too wars with Russia (With his own hands) He denied it, but didn't renounce it. Don't ask me when "it" became apparent; I don't remember.
                      8. 0
                        23 February 2026 22: 17
                        Biden is already gone. The situation is constantly changing. And this is no longer 1990 – the US invasion of Iraq – or 2003.
                      9. +1
                        23 February 2026 22: 25
                        Boots on the ground can provide for provinces with non-Persian populations; don't forget the huge layer of ethnic Kurds, Azerbaijanis, and Arabs on the outskirts of the country. A sharp desire for self-determination in the face of the loss of economic ties with the center and the prospect of life with a devastated energy system and a real all-out war does not particularly inspire loyalty.
                      10. 0
                        23 February 2026 22: 22
                        If you don't understand the dynamics of population growth with a fertility rate of 6% at the time of the revolution, I can't explain it to you. Urbanization occurred gradually and has now reached 77%. If you don't want to understand the gap between the urban and rural populations in their willingness to endure hardships and restrictions and in their sense of themselves and their prospects, then I won't explain it to you. Iran's fertility rate fell below 2% at the turn of the millennium, when urbanization exceeded 55%. Just like in any other country in the world, with an increase in the urban population and rising education levels, the fertility rate falls. In the USSR, for example, in 1970, the fertility rate was 2.1%, falling below replacement level for the first time, taking into account the enormous influence of the Central Asian republics, where the population was actively growing until 2015.
                      11. 0
                        23 February 2026 22: 29
                        Why are you telling me this? In Iran, people are being born and the population is growing, unlike here. And that's good for them. But it's bad for us; our population is declining. What are you trying to prove to me? Will the US come and overthrow the ayatollahs? It won't be long now. Next month will judge us. And don't bother with arguments that prove nothing. Inflation is high in many countries, even without sanctions—and they're still living. Or maybe you received an assignment from your handlers: "Will the US come with hailstones on the hills, and the sun of freedom will shine?" wink laughing laughing
          2. +1
            21 February 2026 19: 37
            Quote: Victor19
            Therefore they will fight to the end.

            How will they fight back against the bombing? There was no ground invasion of Yugoslavia. So here, too, they can simply bomb and ignore the fact that someone down there has united in a single impulse. They'll bomb the hydroelectric power plants, oil refineries, power plants, and military bases and say, "Well, now live in a united 19th-century Iran." A punitive operation to teach others a lesson. request
            1. +3
              21 February 2026 20: 19
              Ignore the slogans; their idea of ​​Iran remains at the level of the Islamic Revolution. It is now a deeply urbanized country with enormous economic and domestic political problems. If China doesn't support them economically, and Russia doesn't help with establishing an air defense system—and this should have been done immediately after last year's US operation—it's too late now; there's every chance the ayatollah regime will collapse.
              1. +3
                21 February 2026 20: 21
                We now need to urgently develop countermeasures in the Caspian and Transcaucasus in the event that Iran becomes a hostile state; this will be a challenge for our country no less than Ukraine's.
              2. -2
                21 February 2026 21: 34
                Russia will not help with the establishment of an air defense system
                And if this air defense shoots down an American plane, it will ruin the negotiations and the spirit of Anchorage. Dmitriev won't sell the Americans 14 trillion worth of resources?! We've already seen enough of how we support our allies. We've also seen enough of how China supports us. Nothing. Brilliant strategists say China doesn't need anyone; they're quite good themselves. True, they import 70% of their oil and iron ore, almost all their gas, lithium, and copper, and most of their aluminum raw materials. But they'll surely succeed by abandoning all their allies, because everyone needs their junk.
                1. +3
                  21 February 2026 21: 48
                  Firstly, we have no alliance treaties with either Iran or China. Secondly, it's in our interests to keep the US bogged down in Iran for as long as possible, as this will allow us to bend them over to Ukraine. Dmitriev doesn't reflect the leadership's position; he's just one of the many possibilities.
                  1. -1
                    21 February 2026 21: 55
                    Secondly, it is in our interests for the US to remain stuck in Iran for as long as possible.
                    To get them stuck, we'd have to really help them. For example, shoot down a couple of B-2s in the summer, or warn them of an attack in advance. But either we can't do anything, or we don't want to. Of course, a miracle is always possible, and someone will finally do something, but I haven't believed in miracles for a long time, not since the fall of 2022. request
                    Firstly, we do not have any alliance treaties with either Iran or China.
                    and there is nothing good about that either
                    1. +2
                      22 February 2026 07: 15
                      You're talking about allies, but I pointed out that they aren't allies, but rather situational partners. And no one directly intervenes in other people's conflicts, and they simply had nothing with which to shoot down the B2 missiles, so why give them any warning if Trump said exactly where they would strike two days in advance?
                      1. -1
                        22 February 2026 15: 20
                        Ah, well, that's right, screw them, since they're situational.
                      2. -1
                        22 February 2026 20: 20
                        If "to hell with them", then there will be no allies or "situational partners"...:)
                      3. +1
                        23 February 2026 14: 51
                        You're so worried about Iran that I'm surprised they've done anything good for you. We have a mutually beneficial arms deal and we cooperated in Syria—that's all from a defense perspective. You're suggesting we intervene on their behalf, as if they're safeguarding our statehood.
                      4. 0
                        23 February 2026 14: 53
                        Then, when the interests of the ruling elite in Iran change and they curtail cooperation, will there again be cries that yet another bunch of brothers have screwed us over?
                  2. -1
                    22 February 2026 12: 01
                    I don't know what Dmitriev is whispering about, but let our former Prime Minister serve as an example for him. The Americans flew to Moscow to demand that Russia stop construction of the nuclear power plant in Bushehr, Iran... To which Primakov responded: "Any whim is at YOUR expense. We invested $8 billion (then) in this construction. Transfer this money to Russia tomorrow, and we'll stop it the day after." And so the Americans left empty-handed.
                    1. +1
                      22 February 2026 13: 24
                      If you've been following the negotiating politics, you've probably already seen that we're playing a classic game of good cop and bad cop: Dmitriev and his comrades are offering a compromise for economic cooperation, while Lavrov and his group are offering a compromise now or worse. It's a classic game, and they'll end up somewhere in the middle.
            2. -1
              22 February 2026 18: 25
              So what? We're bombing Ukraine, and so what? There are no results yet. Without a ground operation, it will be an endless process, especially since they've already bombed Iran many times, starting in 1979. They tried to conduct a hostage rescue operation back then, but they completely screwed up.
            3. 0
              22 February 2026 18: 27
              Serbia is an isolated state without access to the sea. Without outside help. That's why they destroyed it. A "punitive operation." They already carried out that in Iran – to no avail.
  8. +2
    21 February 2026 07: 01
    The "clean" F-22 fighter, for which Iran has no rivals, looks like a clown in a circus arena during a weightlifting performance.
    Nothing of the sort! I read about it a long time ago F-22what is this The aircraft is a sharp spear, followed by a powerful rod of tankers, attack aircraft and bombersAlthough it was designed specifically for air superiority and target interception, it also has capabilities for striking ground targets (albeit modest), electronic warfare, and electronic reconnaissance.

    Now about the radar. There's no reliable data on the detection capabilities or sensitivity of the onboard radar. F-22 While not published anywhere, some indirect evidence suggests it has very high resolution and a low probability of being intercepted by air defense systems, allowing it to find and track targets without alerting the enemy. So, there's no point in scrapping this fighter! P.S. All this can be learned from open and specialized sources in our and foreign media...
    1. + 14
      21 February 2026 07: 40
      So, the F-22 is only a worthless aircraft according to Skomorokhov and his ilk. And they draw this conclusion based on the fact that it never saw combat, that's all.
  9. +2
    21 February 2026 09: 15
    Quote: ZhEK-Vodogrey
    Quote: pudelartemon
    everything will end in fizzle

    The US has the successful example of Syria right before its eyes. And even earlier, Yugoslavia. Plus the recent experience of last year's bombings.
    Everything is exactly the same.
    Protests coordinated via Starlink, sanctions for suppression, democratic rebels from the same Kurds and other Baloch who are promised independence and freedom. All this is supported by periodic precision air strikes and missiles against military personnel and headquarters, the remote killing of commanders and leaders, and the destruction of infrastructure.
    A decade of bloody chaos and voila, Prince Pahlavi will once again be at the helm of a democratic Iran. Look at him, he's already stamping his feet.
    Previously, the idea that Iran was crazy and had a lot of missiles and could really cause Armageddon in the Persian Gulf stopped me.
    What if they end up where they shouldn't?
    But based on the experience of the last three years and last year's bombing, the Americans and Jews apparently have the feeling that the Persians are actually rather soft...
    The ayatollahs spent colossal sums on the armed forces, undermining the country's economy. Fear of an external war has led them to a de facto internal war—a war against their own population, condemned to poverty and lack of prospects. And having built an army, they are afraid to use it to defend against an immediate threat, which they themselves have loudly declared to be a direct enemy of their state.
    The ayatollahs' rhetoric may be as menacing as they like, but they are not prepared to use military force against their own survival, as this would jeopardize their personal security.

    In Russia, Putin is as much of a windbag as the Ayatollah. He's only learned to draw lines and shake his finger. That's why no one takes either Russia or Iran seriously.
    1. +3
      21 February 2026 20: 30
      Apparently, unlike those armchair screamers, he has a more realistic assessment of our capabilities. Are you even aware that 80% of Russia's trade goes across the ocean? Without an ocean-going fleet, we could be squeezed so hard that everyone would howl. No one is going to risk the collapse of the state.
    2. 0
      22 February 2026 11: 49
      It all depends. For some reason, I remember how the British (incidentally, in the same spot in the Mediterranean where the French recently stopped a tanker carrying our oil) stopped a tanker carrying Iranian oil. But after receiving a warning that no British tanker would leave the Strait of Hormuz intact, they immediately came to their senses and pushed the tanker out to sea. And the Greeks, "at the request of the US," even thought of selling the oil from the Persian tanker. However, they later complained for a long time that the Iranians had confiscated two of their oil tankers.
  10. The comment was deleted.
  11. 0
    21 February 2026 09: 42
    It's like the old joke. During World War II, a Polish boy asks a German occupier, "What's written on your belt buckle?" "God is with us." The boy pauses and replies, "And the Soviet Army is with us!" Everything depends on the position of China and Russia. Either we bury our heads in the sand, as in Yugoslavia and Libya, or we dig in our heels, as in Vietnam and Afghanistan.
    1. +1
      21 February 2026 13: 30
      Quote: VovaVVS
      Here we either hide our heads in the sand, as in Yugoslavia and Libya, or dig in our heels, as in Vietnam and Afghanistan.

      The Russian Federation buried its head in the sand, while the USSR dug in its heels. The past tells us we won't dig in our heels. We'll express a resolute protest, or perhaps, frightened by our own courage, simply protest.
      1. 0
        21 February 2026 17: 23
        They're unlikely to utter a protest here. Their red-haired lunatic is almost like a friend, partner, or companion...
      2. +3
        21 February 2026 20: 27
        Are you even capable of realistically assessing Russia's military and economic potential? We can't do anything to stop the invasion; the most we've done has been to strengthen Iran's air defenses. I don't know if they've done that since last year's operation. We can't do anything short of a nuclear ultimatum, and it's foolish to start a nuclear war over an ally of the moment, one with whom we don't even have a military alliance. The only other country with whom we have such an agreement is North Korea.
        1. 0
          22 February 2026 11: 37
          And why didn't Iran say: "We can't supply the Shaheeds" when they saw how UAVs were destroying our front or the DPRK, when they saw how they were beating us near Kursk...
          1. +1
            22 February 2026 13: 21
            When did UAVs destroy our front in 22, and how could the Shahids contribute to that? We have an alliance treaty with the DPRK, and Iran didn't supply its UAVs out of the kindness of its heart, but for money and the support of our aircraft. We supply aircraft and don't refuse. This is what's called a situational ally.
    2. +4
      21 February 2026 14: 29
      What can Russia and China do, convene a UN Security Council meeting? Trump has long since shown he doesn't care; we can't do anything other than provide intelligence support and air defense supplies. There's no threat of direct military intervention, and the Americans understand that. We're barely pulling through the Ukrainian conflict. The Chinese still haven't assembled a fleet capable of 100% breaking the Yellow Sea blockade with the combined forces of America and its allies, and without that, they'll collapse within three years.
      1. 0
        22 February 2026 12: 07
        If our ancestors had reasoned like this in 1812 and 1941, Russia would not have survived any wars.
        1. +1
          22 February 2026 13: 26
          What's the point? Who did Russia defend in 1812 or 1941, and what led to war? You're now proposing, out of nowhere, to intervene on behalf of a less-than-close partner, with an active front in Ukraine where no breakthrough is expected, risking a hot front in the Caucasus. Who benefits from this?
    3. 0
      22 February 2026 00: 58
      It's like the old joke. During World War II, a Polish boy asks a German occupier, "What's written on your belt buckle?" "God is with us." The boy pauses and replies, "And the Soviet Army is with us!"

      A boy from the future. The Soviet army only emerged in 1946, after the war; before that, there was the Red Army.
  12. +2
    21 February 2026 12: 06
    What Roman told us is merely an external manifestation of "theatrical" art, so to speak. I propose digging deeper and examining the internal springs and mechanisms "driving the process." What is Trump trying to achieve? - Security for himself (the US and Co.) and Israel; - Weakening China; - Undermining the strategic alliance between China, Iran, Russia, and North Korea; - Obtaining preferential treatment for himself. The solution to Trump's problems, as a businessman, is a DEAL!
    Oman-brokered indirect talks in Switzerland concluded on Tuesday with an agreement on a "set of guidelines," according to Iran's Foreign Minister. Abbas Araghchi said both sides agreed to exchange drafts of a possible deal. <...> The talks were "more constructive" and made "good progress" compared to the previous round of talks in Oman this month.
    So what does Trump "demand" from the ayatollahs?
    Trump demanded from Iran complete renunciation of the nuclear program As part of the proposed deal, Tehran would cease all uranium enrichment activities and abandon its nuclear weapons development.
    Iran is prepared to transfer all of its enriched U-235 to Russia while retaining its capacity and technology. Tehran understands that the uranium will be returned from Russia as nuclear fuel for its nuclear power plants. But this is unlikely to satisfy the deal-seeker.
    They've now faded into the shadows, but previously there were demands to stop oil supplies to China, disband the "guardians," and grant democratic freedoms to the opposition, etc. But after the suppression of the unrest orchestrated by provocateurs, hopes for regime change through a color revolution have vanished.
    Trump gave Iran 10-15 days to reach an "agreement." During the first meeting of the "Peace Council" on February 19, 2026, he threatened Tehran with "bad things" if a deal wasn't reached within the specified deadline. And if the negotiations failed, "alternative scenarios" would be considered, which could include military action. And to ensure the ayatollahs saw the seriousness of his intentions, an armada of ships and aircraft has been assembled, ready to "bomb" the recalcitrant Persians. So that others would be deterred from arguing with the hegemon. What will happen next? No one can say for sure. One can only speculate. But the situation is tense. In the worst-case scenario, Vladimir Zhirinovsky's predictions about the outbreak of World War II from the Middle East could come true.
    1. ada
      +1
      21 February 2026 18: 06
      Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
      ...But the situation is tense. In the worst-case scenario, V.V. Zhirinovsky's predictions about the outbreak of World War II in the Middle East could come true. ...

      Hello!
      Well, "predictions," specifically as "foresight," are irrelevant here. Knowledge of the evolving global situation in general and in this region in particular, as well as the enemy's and their comrades' planning and a current assessment of probable military threats and political challenges for our country—yes. It was necessary to influence processes negative for us in order to reduce their level, including operational ones. Obviously, the task of somewhat slowing down events was solved, among other things, by such a low-cost method—the informal disclosure of available "information" and a certain vision of trends in the development of the military threat situation in the Middle East by using a "staff forecaster" (forecasting specialist) through a number of media outlets with access to international information transmission (dissemination) channels for dissemination in the desired direction, primarily to the countries of the Middle East. In essence, this compromises the chosen form of military force in an initiated I-V conflict (subject to the creation of the necessary conditions, including in international relations).
      By the way, the work is "harmful" - it won't do any good to your health.
      The above is directly related to the need to obtain a modern nuclear precedent, as a necessary (most desirable) condition for the implementation of the striped ones of their long-term military planning in a number of regions of the world.
      I can, let's say, suggest that BV is the first in line of potential actors to create such a situation. This directly concerns us, as I wrote to you in response to "..." So, it's time to finish the SVO ..." ( https://topwar.ru/277961-korabli-klassa-liberty-v-ssha-aktivizirovali-sozdanie-bezjekipazhnogo-flota.html#comment-id-15819692 ), if you haven't read it.
      For now, the "predictions" are based on the implementation of sequential, phased, planned measures, naturally with adjustments for unexpected circumstances. I believe the current periodic defeat of our critical military units, under the cover of Russian military actions in a bilateral military conflict, are attempts to establish such a precedent.
    2. WIS
      0
      22 February 2026 01: 30
      Quote: Boa constrictor KAA
      But after the suppression of the riots organized by provocateurs, the hope of regime change through a color revolution sank into oblivion.
      Trump gave Iran 10-15 days to reach an "agreement." During the first meeting of the "Peace Council" on February 19, 2026, he threatened Tehran with "bad things" if a deal wasn't reached within the specified timeframe. If the negotiations failed, "alternative scenarios" would be considered, which could include military action.

      very concise and nothing superfluous hi
      I think it was not by chance that Zakharova stated why
      Russia will not be represented at the meeting, as Moscow continues to formulate its position on the organization established by Donald Trump.
      and, moreover, she was already aware then of the kind of confrontation that would develop today against “American-style tyranny.”
  13. +1
    21 February 2026 12: 11
    Why did you put this article in the weapons section? I think it's a pretty good analysis.
  14. 0
    21 February 2026 13: 50
    It's completely unclear; there's been a lengthy discussion in many articles about whether the US and Israel will defeat Iran or not, and what the chances are. Articles should only begin with something like this: "Hitler's heirs want to seize an independent state once again. How will the freedom-loving world respond to aggressive fascists? What severe sanctions will it impose against them? What irreversible losses will the aggressor suffer?" But there are no such terms; everyone has cowardly retreated into hiding. Naturally, in such a favorable atmosphere, how could the aggressor not unleash a new war?
    1. +1
      21 February 2026 22: 54
      Or perhaps the article should be titled, "The Islamic fundamentalist regime will soon fall under the decisive justice of the last bastion of Freedom and Democracy in the world! How soon will the freedom-loving people of Iran free themselves from the oppressive shackles of political Islam?" laughing laughing laughing
  15. +3
    21 February 2026 14: 14
    Enormous resources have been expended on consolidating the group; if Iran doesn't cave in, the operation will go ahead. Trump needs a resounding success before the elections, and he also needs the support of the Israeli lobby; he won't back down. The success of the operation in Syria and Venezuela, as well as last year's operation against Iran, also gives them confidence.
    1. +1
      21 February 2026 22: 31
      [quote=Stanislav Chernov]Colossal resources have been spent on consolidating the group; if Iran doesn't cave in, the operation will take place. Trump needs a resounding success before the elections, and he also needs the support of the Israeli lobby; he won't back down. The success of the operation in Syria and Venezuela, as well as last year's operation against Iran, also gives them confidence.

      If it caves in, there will be more and more demands. Israel and its allies must either topple the shaky regime and install a loyal one, or worsen Iran's position and divide it. This will solve a host of problems, including nuclear weapons, free up their hands in the Middle East, expand at the expense of their neighbors, weaken the Iran-Russia-China axis and north-south transport logistics bypassing the Suez Canal, Iran-China through Central Asia, access to the Caspian Sea, and the export of raw materials from these regions. Weaken Chinese influence there; ours will fade anyway. Harness these flows and bring them under control.
      1. 0
        22 February 2026 07: 19
        That's it, they've announced a refusal to export enriched uranium and a renunciation of ballistic missiles. We're waiting for the operation to begin. We'll see who's right: the ardent Iranian fanatics with their strange notions about the country, or the more cautious assessments.
  16. 0
    22 February 2026 09: 28
    Iran needs arms urgently! American neoconservatives are trying to implement the Syrian and Iraqi scenarios in Iran! This is the craziest thing they could possibly come up with!
  17. 0
    22 February 2026 18: 10
    It's all bullshit, all this riveting. The Americans attack when the country is divided, and the generals are bribed. It's only ours who imagine war as a knight's duel and give the enemy a head start.