The development of Soviet special propaganda in 1919–1921

81 639 28
The development of Soviet special propaganda in 1919–1921

As has become clear from previous articles, military-political propaganda among enemy troops and the general population is essential and highly effective. This work is aimed at morale-destroying enemy armies and the rear, undermining the morale of enemy soldiers and officers, and, through persuasion, separating them from their command and inducing individual and group surrender.

In his book, "Insight," M.I. Burtsev, head of the 7th Department of the Main Political Directorate of the Red Army, rightly noted:



...a demoralized and disillusioned enemy soldier is already our ally, albeit an indirect one. By remaining in the ranks, he somehow influences others, especially those who share his feelings and sentiments, encouraging them to act together as a group.

With this article, I begin a series in which I will discuss the work of Soviet special propaganda, or, as it is sometimes called, "external propaganda." I have studied a large number of archival documents and photographs, as well as books by participants in those events and the memoirs of our veterans who worked in the field of special propaganda.

Due to the extremely small number of works devoted to the study and systematization of these historical Given these events, I believe it's essential to shed as much light on the experience of the Soviet troops as possible. After all, the very practices employed at that time by both the Soviet Union and Nazi Germany formed the basis for many modern information warfare methods, and many old methods of influencing enemy soldiers directly in combat are still used today.

Of course, the Soviet special propaganda apparatus reached its peak during the Great Patriotic War. But before delving into these events, I consider it important to review the history of the formation and development of Soviet "foreign propaganda," as the experience of the USSR's previous military conflicts provided the foundation for the further development of this area of ​​work.

The main military conflicts where the first experience of propaganda targeting enemy troops and populations was acquired were the Soviet-Polish War, the Soviet-Japanese War (battles at the Khalkhin Gol River), and the Soviet-Finnish War (Winter War). The birth of Soviet special propaganda can be considered to have occurred during the Civil War of 1917, but I will not discuss it in these articles, as it was the period of the formation of the Soviet state.

Soviet-Polish War (1919-1921)


Let me point out right away that the Soviet-Polish War is officially considered part of the Civil War, which lasted from 1917 to 1922. Nevertheless, this major military conflict must be examined, as it was during this conflict that the first developments in influencing the troops and population of an enemy state were made.

In this article, I will not dwell in detail on the causes of the war. I will only provide a brief historical overview to help understand the content and meaning of Soviet propaganda aimed at Polish soldiers.

After the defeat of Napoleon's troops and until 1832, only the Kingdom of Poland existed in personal union with the Romanov dynasty, meaning that the tsar of this state was also Alexander I.

However, during World War I, the German Empire and its allies occupied vast territories in the east at the expense of Russia. Berlin decided to create a system of formally independent states in the east, but in fact subordinate to it and ruled by German monarchs. The Germans were further encouraged to create a Polish state by the Polish Legions, volunteer units that fought on Germany's side from the start of the war. Their informal leader was Józef Piłsudski.


Commander-in-Chief of the Polish Army Józef Piłsudski (1867–1935)

In 1918, having become the head of the reborn Polish state, Piłsudski planned to restore Poland to the borders of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth of 1772. This became possible after the collapse of the Russian Empire, as the former borders had been destroyed. To achieve this, he decided to revive the Duchy of Lithuania (the territory of Lithuania and Belarus) and create an independent Ukraine as his allied puppet states.


Mobilization of trade unions for the Western Front. Archives of the Russian State Archive of the Red Army: F. 30. D. A-47. L. 6.

At the time, Soviet Russia was in the midst of a civil war, and the Poles decided to take advantage of this and expand their state's borders. Thus, on January 1, 1919, Polish troops took control of the city of Vilnius in Lithuania, which had already become a Soviet republic in 1918.


Red Army units on Theatre Square before being sent to the Polish Front. RGAKFD Archive: F. 788. Op. 1. D. 704. L. 1.


RGAKFD Archive: No. 4-18098 Artillery A Red Army gun at a combat position in the area of ​​the Western Bug River.


The advance units of the Red Army enter Minsk. GA RF: F. 30. D. A-47. L. 5.

The main document setting the key directions of Soviet foreign propaganda for soldiers of the Polish army was Order No. 34 [“Instructions for the distribution of propaganda literature in areas where enemy troops are located”], issued on June 1, 1920 by the Political Directorate of the Revolutionary Military Council of the Republic, abbreviated as PUR (later it would bear the more familiar name GlavPUR RKKA).

This instruction outlined practical forms of work on distributing campaign materials:
1) use of local services;
2) special messengers-scouts;
3) air forces;
4) reconnaissance detachments and reconnaissance parties pasted appeals on trees, fences, scattered them on the road in dry weather, and left them in all residential and non-residential premises;
5) thrown downwind in a strong wind towards the enemy, in dry weather;
6) leaflets were delivered to the enemy by rafts and boats along the current;
7) left in buildings subject to occupation by the enemy;
8) left and pasted everywhere during retreat;
9) wrote communist slogans on the walls of buildings, fences, etc. with bright paint, charcoal, chalk, etc.;
10) supplied each Red Army soldier with a leaflet during the offensive.

During the Soviet-Polish War, our army created two fronts: the Western Front and the Southwestern Front. Each had its own political department, which coordinated, among other things, special propaganda efforts. Little is known about the Southwestern Front's special propaganda operations due to a lack of documentation.


Map of the Soviet-Polish War of 1919-1921

The work of the Western Front's Political Department (hereinafter referred to as the "Pozap") in this area was concentrated in a special "Agent Department." The Agent Department was created at the beginning of the war for the purpose of intelligence, but, according to documents, its tasks also included the following: "The destabilization of enemy troops through the intensive and widespread distribution of propaganda literature within their ranks." For this purpose, a corresponding apparatus was constructed, which was to "promptly produce the necessary amount of literature and skillfully and regularly distribute it among the enemy."

The agent department of the reserve had one representative for each army, one liaison agent per division, heads of brigade expeditions (responsible for interrogating prisoners and deserters), and literature distributors in regiments, and sometimes even battalions of the Red Army. In addition to the agent department's channels, literature was also distributed through the air force. However, due to the weakness of the Soviet aviation At that time, very little literature passed through it.

Other forms of enemy operations outlined in the PUR instructions, on the contrary, were widely adopted due to their simplicity and yielded good results. Furthermore, during the campaign, the Pozap developed the first propaganda device for distributing leaflets.

In some places fraternization was practiced (a meeting of soldiers from opposing armies in a neutral zone based on a temporary renunciation of hostilities), with the initiative often coming from the Poles, who resorted to fraternization for provocative purposes. On our side, fraternization occurred mostly at the initiative of either Red Army soldiers or lower-level command personnel and political workers. This practice had already been in place during the First World War.


Fraternization between Russian and German soldiers in World War I. July 1917.

For example, on August 29, the head of the political department of the 8th Cavalry Division reported to the head of the political department of the 14th Army: “Between the Cossacks of the 1st Regiment and the Poles, at the initiative of the Cossacks, who wanted to attract the enemy to their side, fraternization took place: those fraternizing inquired about the treatment of prisoners and deserters and, taking newspapers, returned to their trenches, promising to pass on what the Cossacks had said to the other soldiers.”.

In September, in the same army, at the initiative of the Poles, fraternization took place in the 48th Division. In the 15th Army, at the end of April, the Poles proposed fraternization and exchanging literature, and when the political officer with a group of Red Army soldiers departed for the other side of the river, grenades were thrown into the boat, and our delegates were killed. Several other similar instances of fraternization could be cited.

The main directions of Soviet propaganda in the Polish troops were:

1) Exposure of the offensive nature of the war on the part of Poland, its dependence on the imperialist Entente;

2) Contrasting the offensive goals of White Guard Poland with the just, truly revolutionary, defensive war goals of Soviet Russia, exposing the deception about the aggressive and aggressive policy of the Soviet government, promoting its peacefulness, and defending the independence of Poland;

3) Exposure of class and national contradictions in Poland and the revelation of class contradictions in the army itself;

4) Propaganda of the rapid development of the international proletarian revolutionary movement in general against capitalism and, in particular, against White Guard Poland, and in defense of the Soviet republics;

5) A call to overthrow the Polish capitalist government and the Polish bourgeoisie, a call for a socialist revolution and the establishment of a workers’ and peasants’ government;

6) An appeal to end the war in a revolutionary way and to come over to our side; an explanation of our attitude towards prisoners and deserters;

7) Propaganda of the success of our actions, etc.

Below are some Red Army leaflets aimed at destabilizing Polish soldiers. To help you understand their meaning, each leaflet in Polish is followed by an image with a rough translation into Russian.


Poster with an appeal to Polish soldiers from fighters of the Western Rifle Division: “Whom do you serve, soldier, under the sign of the White Eagle?” RGASPI Archive: F. 63. Op. 1. D. 588. L. 11.


Translation of the previous leaflet


A leaflet from the Political Department of the Revolutionary Military Council of the Western Front appealing to Polish soldiers fighting against the Red Army to resist anti-Soviet propaganda and defect to the Reds. RGASPI Archive: KP-104049 PM-3230.



A leaflet from the Political Department of the Revolutionary Military Council of the Nth Army appealing to Polish soldiers not to participate in a war that benefits only capitalists and gentry. RGASPI Archive: KP-104049 PM-3429.



A leaflet-pass with an appeal to Polish soldiers. This type of propaganda was used by Soviet troops as early as 1919. RGASPI Archive: F. 104. Op. 1. D. 18. L. 22–22.


A leaflet from the Revolutionary Military Council of the 12th Army appealing to Polish soldiers to end the fratricidal war and containing excerpts from the Council of People's Commissars of the RSFSR's appeal to the Polish government and people. RGASPI Archive: KP-104049 PM-3419.



Leaflet with the All-Russian Central Executive Committee's appeal to Polish workers, peasants, and soldiers: "Come over to us!" RGASPI Archive: KP-104049 PM-3375.



A fragment of a long leaflet. On the front, a text written on behalf of Polish soldiers captured by the Red Army states that they are being treated well. On the back, a long list of names of Polish prisoners, along with the military units in which they served, is provided. The leaflet is written on behalf of these prisoners. Photo from the Polish archive.



Leaflet from the Polish archive.



A leaflet with an appeal and a photograph of Polish soldiers from a Soviet prisoner-of-war camp. The photograph serves as confirmation that the prisoners are alive and were not executed, as Polish propaganda claims. The leaflet's red color was chosen for better visibility against the white winter snow. RGASPI Archive: Fund 104, Op. 1, D. 18, L. 20–20.



Leaflet from the Polish archive.



Leaflet-postcard with an appeal to Polish soldiers. RGASPI Archive: F. 104. Op. 1. D. 18. L. 22–22.


Leaflet – an appeal from Polish Red Army soldiers to Polish soldiers: "Our rebuke to your officers." RGASPI Archive: KP-104049 PM-3236.



Leaflet from the Polish archive.


As you can see, leaflets aren't particularly high quality yet. The main drawback of most of them is the sheer volume of text. An enemy soldier won't have the time or inclination to read small print in combat, and they could also be caught reading a leaflet by their commander or fellow soldiers. Another drawback was the lack of eye-catching illustrations in most of our leaflets (photographs, drawings, diagrams, battle maps, facsimiles of documents, and the like).

At the same time, as we see, individual leaflets already contained such characteristic propaganda techniques as placing photographs of prisoners of the enemy army on the leaflet and a story about the good treatment they received, providing a list of prisoners with their names and the military units where they served, as well as appeals on their behalf to their former comrades.

In general political matters, our propaganda work was, without exception, class-aligned, sufficiently clear, and powerful. However, the main shortcoming of our work lay not in the political content of the propaganda.

It consisted of constructing agitation solely on the basis of political support for the final goals of the war, while the interests of political support for specific military operations of certain armies and divisions were almost not served.

Political agencies generally didn't set themselves the task of tailoring propaganda to the goals of a specific operation. The Political Directorates (PUR), the political departments of fronts, armies, and divisions, almost always campaigned on general issues, with the same scope and slogans, regardless of whether a given division faced Polish units or half-decomposed Belarusian-Lithuanian units, whether our units were advancing or retreating, and so on.

Political work among Polish prisoners of war was largely unregulated and was carried out ad hoc. On August 15, 1920, a Polish section was created within the agitation and education department, which was later transformed into the Polish department. This department coordinated so-called political education work among Poles in prisoner-of-war camps. This work was carried out by political instructors.

Political work among prisoners of war was carried out through rallies, lectures, discussions, newspaper readings with explanations, and the organization of political literacy schools and party cells. The main topics were: the current war, the conclusion of peace, Soviet construction and the constitution, and religious issues.


A group of prisoners of war, including those from the 5th Polish Division, under escort by Red Army soldiers in a populated area. RGAKFD Archive: No. 0-230399.


A group of captured Polish soldiers after a rally. RGAKFD Archive: KP-34472, 3/29903.

Moreover, the only instruction of the PUR on working among the enemy lacked such crucial instructions as:

1) on the organization of special bodies within the existing political departments, which will carry out work in the enemy troops;
2) on the specific content (at least in the form of a general guideline) of our agitation among the Polish troops and on the specifics of the content of work in the war with the Poles;
3) about new and technically more advanced methods of agitation, since the methods indicated by the PUR are very primitive and home-made;
4) on the line regarding fraternization with the Poles;
5) on work among prisoners of war and on the use of defectors.

The Polish army also directed its own propaganda at the Soviet troops. Polish leaflets are presented below. The photos are taken primarily from Polish archives.





Polish pass leaflet. This leaflet format was used by both the Red Army and Polish troops.


An interesting design decision for the leaflet. The large red letters in the center of the leaflet could have attracted a soldier's attention due to their unusual design.


A Polish leaflet written on behalf of captured Red Army soldiers.





Polish troops made the Cossacks one of the main targets of their propaganda, attempting to convince them of their independence from the Red Army. Furthermore, Polish soldiers often spoke on behalf of non-existent pro-Soviet formations siding with Poland. However, the hope was for more effective propaganda for the Red Army, which was supposedly conducted "by our own people, for our own people."




A leaflet stylized as a newspaper clipping.


A leaflet addressed to specific divisions and brigades of the Red Army. A fairly progressive approach for the time. However, the leaflets do not yet contain information about the losses and difficulties faced by these military units. The leaflet conveys a general message to the Cossacks.



Despite all the shortcomings, this was the Red Army's first experience with special propaganda aimed at soldiers of an enemy state with a sufficiently powerful army. Furthermore, it should be noted that during the early days of Soviet foreign propaganda, many commanders did not take this work seriously. For example, a report from one of the intelligence departments reads: "Our work unexpectedly encountered obstacles among the military commissars, as they had adopted the view that the enemy must be fought with bayonets, not with literature and propaganda.".
28 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +2
    25 February 2026 04: 51
    As one smart man said, Russia is a country with an unpredictable past.
  2. 0
    25 February 2026 07: 31
    Soon the dawn of freedom, the dawn of the workers' revolution, will shine over the whole world.

    23.07.1920 g
    Cipher
    Kharkov. To Stalin
    The situation in the Comintern is excellent. Zinoviev, Bukharin, and I also think that revolution should be encouraged immediately in Italy. My personal opinion is that to achieve this, Hungary must be Sovietized, and perhaps also the Czech Republic and Romania. We must think carefully. Please report your detailed conclusions. The German communists believe that Germany is capable of fielding three hundred thousand lumpenproletarian troops against us. Lenin."

    Kharkov 24.07.1920
    Moscow – the Kremlin, only to Lenin.
    First, the situation on Budyonny's front is good.... Yesterday we ordered Budyonny to break through the front and occupy Lvov by July 30th; perhaps this operation will succeed... Third, I am conveying my opinion in response to your note No. 371. Now that we have the Comintern, a defeated Poland, and a more or less tolerable Red Army, when, on the other hand, the Entente is seeking a respite in favor of Poland in order to reorganize and rearm the Polish army, create a cavalry, and then strike again, perhaps in alliance with other states—at such a moment and with such prospects, it would be a sin not to encourage the revolution in Italy. It must be recognized that we have already entered a period of direct struggle with the Entente, that the policy of maneuvering has already lost its predominant significance, that we can now must pursue an offensive policy (Not to be confused with a policy of harassment) if we want to retain the initiative in foreign affairs that we recently won. Therefore, the Comintern's priority must be to organize an uprising in Italy and in such fragile states as Hungary and the Czech Republic (Romania will have to be crushed). Three hundred thousand lumpenproletariat in Germany, even if they actually existed, certainly do not and cannot change things. In short: we must weigh anchor and set sail before imperialism has time to even slightly straighten out its shaky cart—and it can still manage to do so for a certain period before it launches a decisive offensive.
    Stalin
    1. 0
      25 February 2026 07: 42
      You forgot to indicate the source.
      1. 0
        25 February 2026 08: 00
        Quote: October
        You forgot to indicate the source.

        RGASPI. F. 558. Op. 1. D. 5551. L. 3–4
        Stalin I.V. Works Volume 17 Compiled by: A.E. Kiryunin, R.I. Kosolapov, S.Yu. Rychenkov
        Tver: Scientific Publishing Company “Northern Crown”, 2004. Pp. 122–123.
        P.S: link to RGASPI from the source.
        1. +3
          25 February 2026 09: 50
          Only 13 volumes were published in the USSR.
          What the US published most likely contains fakes. I believe this is one of them.
          1. The comment was deleted.
          2. 0
            25 February 2026 10: 22
            Quote: October
            Only 13 volumes were published in the USSR.
            What the US published most likely contains fakes. I believe this is one of them.

            Tver.
            Tver: Scientific Publishing Company “Northern Crown”, 2004. Pp. 122–123.

            RGASPI. F. 558. Op. 1. D. 5551. L. 3–4
            RGASPI - Russian State Archive of Socio-Political History was created in accordance with the Decree of the Government of the Russian Federation of March 15, 1999, No. 283
            1. +2
              25 February 2026 11: 33
              Tver.

              This post-Soviet source is not reliable. There have been instances of counterfeits being found in such publications.
              1. 0
                25 February 2026 11: 36
                Quote: October
                This post-Soviet source is not reliable. There have been instances of counterfeits being found in such publications.

                RGASPI. F. 558. Op. 1. D. 5551. L. 3–4
                1. 0
                  25 February 2026 18: 20
                  RGASPI. F. 558. Op. 1. D. 5551. L. 3–4

                  I remember they churned out documents about Katyn under Gorbachev, about the famine in the USSR in 1981... I assume that too.
                  1. 0
                    25 February 2026 20: 10
                    Quote: October
                    I remember they churned out documents about Katyn under Gorbachev, about the famine in the USSR in 1981... I assume that too.

                    From the series "You're all lying! I don't believe it!"
                    1. +1
                      25 February 2026 21: 06
                      From the series "You're all lying! I don't believe it!"


                      From the series - the bourgeoisie and their lackeys have nothing to say except lies...
                      This is not the first time that documents about Lenin and Stalin have been fabricated.
                      Probably not the last...
                      The others I know have been debunked by professional historians. I'll wait until this one gets there, if it hasn't already.
                      And I, as I have said more than once, believe Soviet documents and Soviet statistics.
                      1. 0
                        25 February 2026 21: 15
                        Quote: October
                        And I, as I have said many times, believe Soviet documents and Soviet statistics

                        So, the documents published in the USSR weren't "filtered"? That sounds naive, sorry.

                        Which, however, does not exclude the possibility of later forgeries... but I would, for example, be wary of definitely labeling something as a forgery simply because it was not published in the USSR.
                      2. 0
                        26 February 2026 10: 41
                        So, the documents published in the USSR weren't "filtered"? That sounds naive, sorry.

                        Perhaps they were filtered, but after numerous forgeries digging under Lenin and Stalin, the next such document is sent down the beaten path - to the forgery.

                        If there was something to present, they would have presented it long ago.
                      3. 0
                        26 February 2026 10: 48
                        Quote: October
                        Maybe they were filtered

                        Not "maybe," but "definitely." The people weren't just allowed to do anything; that's what we call "freedom of speech" now... so that it doesn't exist at all. laughing

                        Therefore, considerations about

                        Quote: October
                        Only 13 volumes were published in the USSR.

                        и

                        Quote: October
                        There have been instances of counterfeits being found in such publications.

                        - Well, that's not much of an idea. The fact that everything newly published is fake hasn't been proven. And it's unprovable.
                      4. 0
                        26 February 2026 20: 48
                        That's exactly what it is now
                        "freedom of speech"

                        Are you familiar with, for example, the case of Sergei Udaltsov?

                        It has not been proven that everything newly published is fake.

                        The immense interest of certain circles in tarnishing certain individuals at any cost has been proven. The mass of fakes produced on a regular basis testifies to this.
                        As for this one specifically, the timing and location of its appearance are disturbing. And it even mentions Lenin's name, despite the fact that this quote is NOT in Lenin's works!!!

                        The people could do not only everything

                        The people had far more freedom back then than they do now. And the top brass didn't brazenly steal billions and then have to spend it for health reasons. Back then, people would be shot for that.
                      5. +1
                        26 February 2026 20: 52
                        Quote: October
                        Are you familiar with, for example, the case of Sergei Udaltsov?

                        I heard something, I don’t remember... is it really that important?

                        Quote: October
                        It has been proven that certain circles have a very strong interest in tarnishing certain people at any cost.

                        Once again, by division:

                        There were documents that weren't published under the USSR. The reason was ideological restrictions—"the cattle aren't allowed to see a lot."
                        - You have not proven that everything published after the collapse of the USSR is fake.

                        Все.

                        Quote: October
                        The people had much more freedom then than they do now.

                        I wasn't talking about freedom in general, I was talking about freedom of informationThere is significantly more of it now than when I was 30, for example.
                      6. +1
                        26 February 2026 21: 02
                        I heard something, I don’t remember... is it really that important?

                        Did I understand you correctly that you said that there is more freedom of speech now than in the USSR?
                        I gave you a counterexample that refutes you.
                        Once again, by division:

                        - there were documents that were not published under the USSR.

                        I completely agree, there were such people. They even had to be.
                        The reason is ideological restrictions: "cattle can't do many things."

                        That's your personal opinion, which we'll leave to your conscience. As for me, I think that everything possible and impossible has been published about Lenin and Stalin. And such documents would have surfaced long ago.
                        You have not proven that everything published after the collapse of the USSR is fake.

                        Все.

                        But you haven't proven that this repository isn't occupied by forgers. And there are plenty of precedents where forgers have been at work. Enough for that.
                        And further, I have provided arguments that allow me to disbelieve that this document is genuine. I could add more arguments, but I don't think it's necessary.

                        Все.

                        I was talking about freedom of information. There's significantly more of it now than there was when I was 30, for example.

                        If you're talking about technology, I agree with you. With the caveat that much of this sea of ​​information is misinformation.
                      7. +1
                        26 February 2026 21: 15
                        Quote: October
                        Did I understand you correctly that you said that there is more freedom of speech now than in the USSR?

                        No, you got it wrong. I was saying only and exclusively For information on how to obtain information, see above.

                        Quote: October
                        I think that everything that could and could not be published about Lenin and Stalin has been published.

                        I see. Well, I don't argue with those who believe... but I'll note that in the 70s I interacted a lot with leading party members (my grandmother was the second secretary of the city committee of the CPSU, in a large city in the south), and I gleaned a lot of interesting information from there. As for what to publish and what not, decisions were made in those same circles, only on a higher level.

                        Quote: October
                        But you haven't proven that this storage facility isn't inhabited by counterfeiters.

                        I wasn't going to prove it. They may have worked there, but This does not prove that everything published after the USSR is a product of their life activity. laughing

                        Quote: October
                        If you are talking about technology

                        No. Not about technology. Specifically, about freedom of acquisition and distribution. Unfortunately, there's a flip side to this coin—now

                        Quote: October
                        In this sea of ​​information, much of it is misinformation.

                        And again, a correction: a significant part, not necessarily a large one.
                      8. 0
                        27 February 2026 18: 22
                        You have a contradiction

                        Quote: October
                        If you are talking about technology

                        No. Not about technology. Specifically, about freedom of acquisition and distribution.


                        But I specifically clarified this with you above.
                        Quote: October
                        Did I understand you correctly that you said that there is more freedom of speech now than in the USSR?

                        You answered
                        No, you misunderstood. I was speaking solely and exclusively about the possibility of obtaining information, see above.

                        So what are you talking about?
                        About information dissemination technologies, which are undoubtedly better now?
                        Or that, in your opinion, the state allows too much freedom of information to be disseminated, i.e., we have too much freedom of speech?
                      9. +1
                        27 February 2026 18: 25
                        Quote: October
                        You have a contradiction

                        There's no contradiction. "Freedom of speech" is a broader concept than "the ability to obtain information." And I wasn't talking about technology.

                        I'm lazy, to be honest. It's Friday evening... arguing about who knows what with who knows who—I'm not interested. Come back later. Yes
                      10. 0
                        27 February 2026 18: 29
                        This is "freedom of speech" now...

                        These were your words, don't evade them.
                        And I gave you a counterexample.
                      11. +1
                        27 February 2026 18: 33
                        Quote: October
                        These were your words

                        With meat, taken out of context by you:

                        Quote: October
                        Quote: Paranoid62
                        So, the documents published in the USSR weren't "filtered"? That sounds naive, sorry.

                        Maybe they were filtered

                        Quote: Paranoid62
                        Not "maybe", but "definitely". The people were allowed not only everything, this is now - "freedom of speech"... so that it does not exist at all

                        Do you know what "words in parentheses" are? If not, Google it...

                        And yes, I really don't like manipulators. Be careful.
                      12. 0
                        27 February 2026 21: 48
                        Sorry, but you are the one trying to manipulate now.
                        Not "maybe", but "definitely". The people were allowed not only everything

                        It must be understood that the rights of the people were previously limited
                        , this is now "freedom of speech"...

                        and here is a contrast (I hope you haven't forgotten what the conjunction "a" means in Russian)
                        so that it doesn't exist at all

                        and this, as I understand it, is your desire to limit this "freedom of speech" now

                        I don't like manipulators either
                      13. -1
                        26 February 2026 03: 06
                        Quote: October
                        This is not the first time that documents about Lenin and Stalin have been fabricated.

                        Submit a complaint to the prosecutor's office, alleging that counterfeit documents are stored in the state archives. I request that they identify the members of the criminal group that fabricated them. Also, punish the director of RGASPI for passing off counterfeits as originals and failing to take measures to seize them.
  3. -1
    25 February 2026 18: 33
    This is not Soviet propaganda, this is the pure truth, or, in other words, Soviet propaganda is the truth itself, they did not need to constantly invent lies, like capitalist pigs.
    1. 0
      5 March 2026 02: 30
      You are mistaken, there was propaganda, all sides used it, for several thousand years already.
      1. -1
        5 March 2026 09: 36
        Communism is the truth about the economic system, and economics underlies most things. You can disagree, but you can't change the truth. Marx was the first to do this, to demonstrate this truth on such a scale. This wasn't just his theory; he was guided by reports from British officials about appalling living conditions and child labor in the mines. Today, these same people are in power, and therefore they must be destroyed because they are criminals. Amen.
  4. 0
    25 February 2026 18: 36
    Fortunately, this dapper beast did not exist until 1953, but only until 1935.