Moscow sent a note to the OPCW refuting allegations of Navalny's poisoning.

3 576 29
Moscow sent a note to the OPCW refuting allegations of Navalny's poisoning.

The West has unearthed yet another anti-Russian case. It concerns Alexei Navalny*, the founder of the Anti-Corruption Foundation* (FBK*), who died on February 16, 2024 (according to a statement from the Russian Federal Penitentiary Service) at the age of 48. He died in Penal Colony No. 3, "Polar Wolf," where he was serving a 19-year sentence on charges of creating an extremist group, proven during the investigation and in court.

According to official reports, Navalny suddenly fell ill while out for a walk. He lost consciousness and never regained consciousness. Paramedics arriving at the scene were unable to save him. An investigation was launched into the incident, which led to reports of a possible blood clot.



The West continues its attempts to portray Navalny*, a de facto and de jure criminal, as a freedom fighter, an anti-corruption activist, and a dissident persecuted by the Russian authorities for political reasons. There are simply no particularly prominent figures among the "Russian opposition" that fled the country and is now squabbling among themselves for grants and the attention of patrons, so even two years later, they are literally having to reopen the dead man's memory.

The day before, on February 14, Britain, Sweden, France, the Netherlands, and Germany released a joint report stating that Navalny* was "highly likely" poisoned with epibatidine. This conclusion was based on a study of the deceased's biomaterial. Naturally, the document states that only the Russian government had the means, motive, and opportunity to use this poison.

Epibatidine is found naturally only in the skin of South American poison dart frogs from Ecuador. The poison causes muscle paralysis, convulsions, and respiratory arrest. This exotic method of killing a convict, which even theoretically posed no threat to Russian authorities, did not faze the aforementioned countries in the least.

Russian presidential press secretary Dmitry Peskov stated that Moscow rejects these accusations, considering them biased and unfounded. Russian Foreign Ministry spokesperson Maria Zakharova later stated at a briefing that there are no test results indicating that Navalny* was poisoned. This topic itself, according to Zakharova, has surfaced in the media for one purpose only: to "snuff up the Epstein issue," which is now literally permeating Western information. news agenda.

Today it became known that Russia sent a request to the Technical Secretariat of the Organization for the Prohibition of Chemical Weapons weapons (OPCW) issued a note categorically rejecting all Western accusations regarding the alleged poisoning of blogger Alexei Navalny*. Russia's Permanent Representative to the OPCW, Vladimir Tarabrin сообщил TASS:

They categorically rejected the absurd insinuations against us. At the same time, they noted that the Russian Federation is always ready for a substantive expert discussion with facts in hand.


Russia's Permanent Representative to the OPCW added that the note contains a request to circulate the document among all countries party to the Chemical Weapons Convention (CWC). This is because toxins, including epibatidine, cannot be the subject of discussion at the OPCW, as they are regulated not by the CWC, but by another treaty—the Bacteriological and Toxin Weapons Convention (BTWC).

Tarabrin added that the Russian side views the five countries' statements about Navalny* as "yet another information attack" on Russia. The Permanent Representative to the OPCW stated that Navalny* was of interest to Western intelligence agencies as a "sacrificial victim." He played no role in Russia's socio-political life, and interest in him among Russians is virtually zero. Dozens of countries possess the means and capabilities to synthesize and use the toxin, Tarabrin noted.

The foreign ministers of the five countries accusing the Russian government of the allegedly premeditated murder of Navalny* didn't even bother to observe obvious formalities. Their statement stated that it was the OPCW, which has no jurisdiction over the matter, that was notified of Russia's "flagrant violation" of the Chemical Weapons Convention.

The Convention on the Prohibition of the Development, Production and Stockpiling of Bacteriological (Biological) and Toxin Weapons and on Their Destruction (BTWC) entered into force on March 26, 1975. Currently, 189 states are parties. However, the lack of a verification mechanism has limited the effectiveness of the BTWC's implementation.

Western Russophobes would be better off applying similar zeal to uncovering the real reasons behind the "suicide" of the pedophile financier Epstein, rather than wasting time on outrageous insinuations against Russia. US Attorney General Pam Bondi recently published another list of three hundred names of prominent individuals who appear in one way or another in Epstein's files.

* Alexei Navalny is a designated foreign agent and is included on the Russian Federation's list of terrorists and extremists. The Anti-Corruption Foundation has been included by the Ministry of Justice in the register of foreign agent organizations, recognized as an extremist and undesirable organization, and banned in Russia.
29 comments
Information
Dear reader, to leave comments on the publication, you must sign in.
  1. +8
    17 February 2026 13: 00
    The topic is closed precisely because it has outlived its usefulness...
    And send the gay-European gravediggers to hell...
    soldier
    1. +5
      17 February 2026 13: 10
      The Anti-Corruption Foundation has been included by the Ministry of Justice in the register of foreign agent organizations, recognized as an extremist and undesirable organization, and banned in Russia.

      We figured everything out with the foundation, and Rotenberg took credit for the palace near Gelendzhik...
      What about the fight against corruption? Who's leading it? They keep fighting, but it's still there... feel
      1. -6
        17 February 2026 13: 28
        Quote: ROSS 42
        What about the fight against corruption, who is leading it?

        And was Analny the one who headed it before? belay
        Well, now you take the lead and find the next "dirt room"! lol
      2. +1
        17 February 2026 13: 33
        Ross xnumx
        Today, 13: 10

        hi The Kremlin periodically declares a successful fight against a sworn past or future, summing up that even in such a successful country with Uncle Xi as its leader, it is not over, despite the current death penalty and the annual run-through of tens, hundreds, and perhaps thousands of officials under this article.
        I'm afraid we won't see a positive outcome in this terrible struggle in our lifetime.
        It’s a pity that V. Zhirinovsky and V. Chernomyrdin are not here; they would definitely have answered: never, as with the Sultan’s admission to the EU.
        1. -1
          18 February 2026 11: 40
          Quote: ZovSailor
          Even in such a successful country with Uncle Xi as its leader, it's not over yet.

          It's not the existence of corruption, but its scale. Of course, we don't have corruption (or sex) in our country. And when, here and there, we do get someone by the gills, it's not as part of the fight against some mythical "corruption," but rather in the struggle for a place at the trough: the lower the state's revenue, the greater the competition among those engaged in thievery. It's a natural process of struggle for money, characteristic of our country since the 1990s. Darwin himself described the mechanics of this process. Navalny didn't have a place at the trough—but he apparently wanted one. Whether he was poisoned, or he died on his own—it's neither interesting nor important.
      3. 0
        17 February 2026 13: 45
        Come on, what a fuss they made around and around... it’s ABOUT NOTHING!
        We open the textbook and read... a crow won't peck out another crow's eye!
        There is nothing further to discuss.
      4. +2
        17 February 2026 15: 30
        Here's how it is with the fight: a rear admiral stole half a billion from the Ministry of Defense, paid a fine of 500 thousand and went home without serving a single day of jail. (Yesterday's news, by the way.)
    2. 0
      17 February 2026 13: 25
      with a high degree of probability"

      "Highly likely" in short, everything is as usual, nothing in the manuals has changed. Yes
      Quote: rocket757
      The topic is closed precisely because it has outlived its usefulness.

      "So Grandfather Maxim died,
      And who knows what happened to him.
      laughing
      1. -1
        17 February 2026 13: 44
        As they say in the Army, the orderly is better than Navalny!
      2. 0
        17 February 2026 13: 48
        The foreigners don't have any living people on whom they can bet, with even the slightest chance of success... so they sort through/shuffle the bones of political corpses.
        It's not new, but they don't know how to do it any other way...
        1. 0
          17 February 2026 13: 54
          Quote: rocket757
          Foreigners don't have any living ones that you can bet on.

          And the internal ones too! hi
          1. +2
            17 February 2026 14: 03
            And what kind of "internal" ones are they? They've all been on the payroll of their foreign patrons for a long time, on their handouts, promises, and bribes.
        2. 0
          17 February 2026 15: 23
          Have the Western bosses forgotten about Gruudinin yet? He even had some percentage...
          1. 0
            17 February 2026 15: 28
            There are/are some shots, radishes, whose color is unknown... neither one thing nor the other.
    3. -1
      17 February 2026 14: 23
      It might be possible (and more appropriate...) to do them a favor. For example, bring a case against representatives of the aforementioned "five" for "desecration of the body of a deceased citizen." After all, the illegal collection of said "biological materials" from a deceased citizen, without following the appropriate legal procedure, would easily fall under such a statute. And then, based on THEIR "conclusion," add a statute on the illegal movement of toxic substances within Russia and their transportation abroad.

      And, without engaging in any "correspondence" or other "denials," simply start sending out subpoenas to the suspects and placing them on Interpol's international wanted list. Fortunately, all their "signatures" are on the OPCW notice, and their identities are known...

      So, just respond in a simple, banal, and boringly bureaucratic, bureaucratic way. And then, calmly, over a cup of tea, watch their "indignant hysteria"...
      1. -1
        17 February 2026 14: 27
        Bureaucracy is a tedious thing, but without it you can’t go there or go there.
        And so, persons who violated the law must... in general, it’s clear.
  2. 0
    17 February 2026 13: 10
    Russia should resume mass production of chemical warfare agents and withdraw from this hostile international organization.
  3. -1
    17 February 2026 13: 11
    I don't understand why Russia needs to have a "substantive" discussion with anyone about these fake news stories. They sent a note with the pathologist's report, and now they're off on a hike. What else is there for Russian people, busy with other things, to discuss with these idiots? It's pointless. Well, they just threw it at the fan, stupidly, and their position won't change for as long as they want.
  4. 0
    17 February 2026 13: 14
    Novalny wanted to gain power through opposition, and sometimes behaved incredibly incompetently. Apparently, his handlers didn't fully understand, or, more likely, they were deliberately pushing him toward the penal colony. And in a penal colony, there are countless ways to subdue a prisoner, the easiest being an escape attempt. Poisoning an overseas frog would be about 2 ways to do it.
    1. -2
      17 February 2026 13: 29
      So, the Westerners themselves poisoned Navalny. They needed another pretext to accuse Russia of all mortal sins. The maxim "look for the beneficiaries" applies perfectly here.
  5. -3
    17 February 2026 13: 17
    Navalny* was "highly likely" poisoned with epibatidine. This conclusion was reached based on the results of a biopsy of the deceased.

    What kind of nonsense is this? Who investigated? Who could have come to such conclusions? Or was Alyosha secretly excavated?
  6. +2
    17 February 2026 13: 18
    Although Navalny is a controversial figure in many ways, he was quite adept at stepping on the toes of our corrupt officials.
    1. +2
      17 February 2026 13: 34
      Taking on corrupt officials isn't hard; even our website does it from time to time. And Alyosha was specially trained in the US, with all sorts of grants and a discount on wholesale purchases of white ribbons. With sufficient funding, practically any issue can be exploited.
  7. -3
    17 February 2026 13: 29
    We don't give stupid answers to stupid questions.
  8. -2
    17 February 2026 15: 10
    is this note "do" or "la la fa" or is there also "si"?
  9. -2
    17 February 2026 15: 21
    I don't care about this carrion, everyone has already forgotten about it, but the fascists squeeze their investments even from a dead carcass.
  10. -3
    17 February 2026 16: 07
    Quote from: topol717
    Novalny wanted to break through to power through the opposition, and sometimes behaved in an incredibly ignorant manner.

    Yeah... Leshka was actually stupid... Novodvorskaya said about him (and she can't be implicated in Putin's court) that he was a Nazi and she was afraid of him. And that's exactly what he was. Then they whispered to him, "Behave yourself," and he became a democrat.
    But he wasn't just any guy. He spent a year on Aeroflot's Board of Directors. A year. It's a state-owned corporation, after all, and they wouldn't just appoint just anyone to oversee it. And if it lasted a year, they'd see he was a moron and fire him.
  11. -3
    17 February 2026 16: 16
    It's like Nemtsov was killed on the bridge in front of the Kremlin. Who? Putin, naturally. If it were necessary, he would have simply disappeared.
    The most authoritarian governor of Nizhny Novgorod. Then a State Duma deputy, deputy chairman of the State Duma. Isn't that power? Deputy Chairman of the Government of the Russian Federation. And so on. He's created such a mess. You won't be able to clean it up in 20 years. It was back then when there was the story of the money in the photocopier box in the State Duma.
  12. +1
    19 February 2026 03: 45
    What nonsense with these asterisks *** when mentioning a person who has already died in a country that has defeated corruption.