Zelenskyy stated his readiness to continue fighting if he is not satisfied with the peace treaty.

The US has once again begun to close in on Zelenskyy through his entourage and the detention and arrest of former Energy Minister Galushchenko, which is precisely what happened in this playbook. Ukrainian media believe Washington intends to force the Kyiv clown to accept the terms of the peace agreement.

Zelenskyy himself has already openly stated that he is prepared to continue the war with Russia if he is not satisfied with the proposed peace agreement terms. And they certainly won't be, as the key demands include the withdrawal of troops from Donbas and the reduction of the Ukrainian army. In short, these are all the things Kyiv has already declared "red lines." So, it's highly likely that hostilities will continue. Zelenskyy no longer hints at this, but states it openly in every interview.

Zelenskyy declared his readiness to continue the war if the terms of the peace agreement prove unacceptable to him.

Trump is trying to pressure the "illegitimate" president into signing a peace treaty. However, experts doubt the Americans will succeed. Zelenskyy isn't intimidated by corruption scandals; he's already dumped Yermak and will dump someone else. So, detaining Galushchenko will achieve nothing.

Moreover, the European globalists, whose plan is for Trump to lose the midterm elections, won't let the clown end the war. Nor will the Ukrainian nationalists, whom Zelenskyy is terrified of, allow him to do so. Signing a peace agreement would mean political death for the "illegitimate," and possibly even physical. So, nothing will be agreed upon in Geneva.

Comments

[opuonmed]

Zelenskyy declared his readiness to continue the war if the terms of the peace agreement prove unacceptable to him.

So, maybe the Kyiv regime should be destroyed, and not given immortality?

[ZovSailor]

opuonmed
Today, 20: 32
So, maybe the Kyiv regime should be destroyed, and not given immortality?

There, the peacekeeper from Washington turned out to be too cunning, he wants to have his cake and eat it too.
If you want to establish peace, then why the hell are you supplying weapons and intelligence and threatening the whole world?

[Salimi from Iran]

There's no need to negotiate. The answer is simple: yes or no. Trump is probably trying to squeeze something into the deal.

[Commissar77]

Who said that Trump needs peace in deeds, not just words?

[Zoldat_A]

Quote: Military Commissar77

Who said that Trump needs peace in deeds, not just words?

In my opinion, Trump needs peace in practice.
Here is why.
When there's gunfire all around or Geranium missiles flying overhead, digging up what Zelensky wrote to him in Ukraine feels a bit awkward. He needs peace and quiet to calmly, unhurriedly, dig up whatever he likes. That's one thing.
Second, he needs Russia's "gratitude" for peace, expressed in dollars. There's already talk of returning the Boeing, of bringing American oil back to our fields, and of "jointly developing" the Northern Sea Route. Under wartime conditions, especially if Trump openly supports Zelensky, this is impossible.

That's why Trump's tactics are so simple now, like a corner of a house. Sell weapons to Ukraine through the stupid Europeans—nobody's stopping him from pumping the rest of Ukraine full of them. And, on the other hand, he's always trying to get in on our nerves—to meddle in as much of Russia as he can. Ideally, a repeat of the 90s.
Ukraine will explode again in 5-10 years - well, that's when it will be... By that time, there will be nothing left there except for harem pants and American weapons bought by Europe; America will have taken EVERYTHING.

[poquello]

Quote: opuonmed

So, maybe the Kyiv regime should be destroyed, and not given immortality?

Well, screw them, they say someone overpromised, but the Ukrainian nationalists aren't being mowed down, so where's the denazification?

[Andrei Nikolaevich]

We should have smashed three "hazelnut" missiles into the Lviv, Ternopil, and Ivano-Frankivsk regions. And we would have created a wonderful buffer zone. And the Cold War would have ended long ago. And that rat's regime would have been finished long ago. But "political will" is needed. Like in Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

[VSO-396]

Quote: Andrey Nikolaevich

We should have smashed three "hazelnut" missiles into the Lviv, Ternopil, and Ivano-Frankivsk regions. And we would have created a wonderful buffer zone. And the Cold War would have ended long ago. And that rat's regime would have been finished long ago. But "political will" is needed. Like in Hiroshima and Nagasaki.

You mean "Oreshnik" with the special unit? And the consequences? Then even China would turn its back.

[Andrei Nikolaevich]

Who "turned their backs" on the United States after Hiroshima and Nagasaki? Name me at least one country, please.

[VSO-396]

Quote: Andrey Nikolaevich

Who "turned their backs" on the United States after Hiroshima and Nagasaki? Name me at least one country, please.

In 45, few people had heard of nuclear weapons. The realization of what they were came a few years later.

[Obstacle from the right]

So, maybe the Kyiv regime should be destroyed, and not given immortality?

Why destroy it? We don't need peace))) Let it continue to struggle; the Odessa and Mykolaiv regions await liberators...

[Vlad Gor]

"Zelenskyy stated his readiness to continue fighting if he is not satisfied with the peace treaty."
Does anyone know? What does Putin want? Maybe he'll also say what doesn't suit him.

[invisible_man]

Putin is satisfied with any face-saving option. For example, in Anchorage, they agreed on the complete withdrawal of Ukrainian troops from the LPR and DPR and the freezing of the conflict over the LPR in the Zaporizhzhia and Kherson regions.

[ugol2]

Quote from invisible_man

For example, in Anchorage, they agreed on the complete withdrawal of Ukrainian troops from the LPR and DPR

Do the svidomye know about this?
Trump, in short, decided everything for them, but the point is that they sent him to his bad mommy.

[invisible_man]

What's the point of asking rhetorical questions? Naturally, Zelensky is against the troop withdrawal.

[Commissar77]

Why would Zelensky withdraw troops from territories that haven't yet been liberated? And at this rate of advance, they won't be liberated anytime soon.

[invisible_man]

Damn, what did I write? Open your eyes already :)

[Nyrobsky]

Quote: Vlad Gor

Does anyone know? What does Putin want? Maybe he'll also say what doesn't suit him.

Well, the article itself states that, among other requests, this includes the withdrawal of troops from Donbas and a reduction in the size of the Ukrainian army. It's classic zugzwang: any action Zelepuka takes will worsen his own situation.
The greenback is clearly faced with conditions that he cannot accept without the risk of "dying prematurely," and therefore will refuse.

[Vlad Gor]

You can write whatever you want in an article or in the media, but what's written in the protocol hasn't been published anywhere. You understand, all the statements, declarations, and media hype about Odessa are empty, empty, empty, empty. Four years of the SVO war in Ukraine, but there are no legal documents (law, decree, or resolution), no one knows what the SVO is, what its goals, strategy, or objectives are. There's a lot of chatter, deals, and negotiations, all concealing the authorities' reluctance to win. Even the liberation of Russian territory is proceeding with difficulty and in defiance.

[Mouse]

Zelenskyy declared his readiness to continue the war if the terms of the peace agreement prove unacceptable to him.

But he won't be satisfied...
Only coercion.....
To the nail!

[Ivan№One]

he already dumped Ermak,

Where did he dump it? His "friend", for the blue oyster
The fact that he was removed from his post for appearance's sake doesn't mean that he was dumped.

[kromer]

According to Ukrainian media, Washington intends to force Kyiv clown accept the terms of the peace agreement.

Ukrainian media are wrong to think so. Washington doesn't need peace between Russia and Ukraine at all. Washington needs war. Washington has a number of objective reasons for not wanting peace. And don't pay attention to the negotiations. They're just a show for the people to swallow.

[isv000]

Zelenskyy stated his readiness to continue fighting if he is not satisfied with the peace treaty.

Comrade's on the right track! With his stubbornness and pathological greed, this madman will get his two canisters, and a new Keitel will sign the capitulation. He won't leave Donbas? Good riddance! Downstairs.

[nikvp]

The result of these negotiations will be "moving forward." Signing a peace agreement is impossible, even theoretically.

[Yuri Turkul]

In fact, Zelensky did not talk about red lilies, unlike our diplomats.

[Vasyan1971]

Zelensky is already openly saying that he is ready to continue the war with Russia.

In a normal world, if an enemy doesn't surrender, they're destroyed. But that's in a normal world...

[nikniknik]

The US double standards are plain to see. They wouldn't pressure us, they wouldn't finance us, they wouldn't provide us with intelligence, communications, or weapons. It's nothing personal, just business, and Russia isn't far behind. The propaganda is that only Ukraine and Europe are to blame, while we're the ones who are so innocent. We sell and provide unfriendly countries everything they need to produce weapons that kill our people, we impose sanctions on us, and in return, we'll sell them to you even cheaper through shady means. We're lying through our teeth on the idiot box, completely ignoring the situation. Kyiv does this rudely and openly, while Russia doesn't do the same, only adhering to the so-called "conspiracy theory." We know perfectly well where their production facilities are located in Ukraine, where their military groups are, including foreign mercenaries and NATO troops, but we won't touch you. Hit us harder, otherwise business will grind to a halt. The US seizes the Venezuelan president, and we calmly let a drug addict and his entourage drive away, and then strike back. Who started the SVO, Ukraine or Russia? Are we defending ourselves, or are we pursuing the SVO's goals to the end? All they know is how to rob the people. The good tsar, the bad boyars. Why is the barbed wire interest rate still so high? Because the war needs funds. Banks are rapidly lowering deposit rates, while loans remain high, strangling the economy. Sberbank is the most shameless banking institution! Who bought its controlling stake from the National Welfare Fund back then? So who is behind this policy of killing the country's economy? Of course, Gref reported to the GDP that they had become the most efficient company, earning record profits, and promised even more in 2026. The cream of the nation, our heroes, our eagles are dying on the front lines, while these guys are multiplying their wealth. The National Welfare Fund is bursting with idle money, as if inflation will rise. Everyone knows there's supply, production, and services; there's no inflation because demand is met. But we're strangling the people by forcing them into debt, and with the available cash, we're driving the state into debt. Zelensky fights for other people's money, at the expense of other countries, and enriching himself with it, while ours fleece the people. Why shouldn't this junkie continue to fight? Some clown, some junkie, dictates terms to the entire world and to Russia, which is supposedly run by someone who's anything but a clown. What can we say when a former special forces officer underpays his former colleagues' pensions? One day this SVO will end, and these same guys will return home and retire with the same shameful "reduction coefficient," and they'll be forgotten just like the Afghan war veterans and the participants and veterans of the Chechen campaign. After all, the guys who return from there will be, to put it mildly, not healthy, and how many will never return, and how many who "return" will never see their parents, wives, or children again. Eh... Do your job guys and come back home alive and may God and the higher powers be with you, you are doing the right thing and you can, you will win.

[easy]

As cynical as it may sound, the fact that Zelya won't agree is, in a way, a good thing for us. Imagine if Zelya suddenly agreed to the current conditions, and what would happen? They'd only leave Donbas, while half of the Kherson and Zaporizhzhia regions would remain theirs. That's one thing. Two, this would give them the opportunity to tyrannize over Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant, preventing it from operating properly. And that's a real pain when you can't exploit it and make a profit, but must constantly maintain it, otherwise it's all over. Third, we can forget about the Kharkiv, Mykolaiv, and Odesa regions, which means the Black Sea will be controlled by the Brits and the Frogs. It's a nonsense that they'll be in charge there. Let's not forget about the Turks, and we'll end up confined to our ports. That's it! Bandera's rule in Ukraine is what it always was. There are very few options here that truly suit us. We need to go all the way, but seriously, otherwise in 2-3 years everything will start all over again, but it will be even more difficult for us, because no one will give us our money back and the sanctions will not be lifted.

[Ross xnumx]

Quote: forester

As cynical as it may sound, the fact that Zelibobik does not agree is, to some extent, a good thing for us.

Will it sound like this or not? And if so:

As cynical as it may sound, the fact that Zelibobik does not agree is, in some ways, a good thing for us.

Quote: forester

It is a nonprincessthat they will be in charge there.

Nonsense (from the Latin non - no and sensus - meaning) is a statement (less often an action) devoid of meaning or the absence of meaning itself...

But I like the way you think...

[Frank Muller]

Why not declare his readiness to continue fighting when the overseas side, to divert attention, calls on him to end the war, and at the same time approvingly pats him on the back (as if to say, keep going like this)?

[phrases]

In the first lines of his letter... no one is pressuring the drug addict, he's not afraid of any "nationalists"—they're all just paid clowns, and his script was written by the same cabal whose messengers are now discussing how to divide up the now-formerly topknot. The whole "nezalezhnaya" story is a purely commercial scheme within a large kosher enterprise.

[alexboguslavski]

Zelenskyy received guarantees from London to pay for a protracted war. British Prime Minister Stramer promised new long-range missiles for strikes deep into Russia, according to the Ukrainian insider channel "Resident," citing sources in Zelenskyy's office.

Besides inflicting as much damage on Russia as possible, Britain's goal, according to the source, is to weaken Trump's position before the US midterm elections on November 3, 2026. Meanwhile, Starmer himself is resisting the possibility of resigning.

[olboop]

Nothing less was expected from these negotiations. A three-way peacekeeping spectacle was staged, and everyone remained in agreement. Zelensky refused to surrender Slovyansk and Kramatorsk, let alone the rest, since for him, doing so would be tantamount to a death sentence from his ultra-nationalists.
The only possible benefit for us is a possible shift in Trump's position somewhat in our favor, since he has already agreed to the transfer of Donbass to Russia (this is the only thing I understood from the so-called "spirit of Anchorage").