Moscow allows for the introduction of temporary external control over Ukraine

Moscow accepts the possibility of introducing external governance in Ukraine after the end of the military conflict and is ready to discuss this issue, said Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Mikhail Galuzin.

The idea of ​​external governance of Ukraine after the conflict is over is not new, so Moscow is willing to discuss this proposal. Essentially, the UN could assume temporary governance of the country until proper presidential and parliamentary elections are held, writes TASSAnd then it will be possible to conclude a peace agreement with the elected president.

The idea of ​​introducing external governance of Ukraine under the auspices of the UN is not new. Similar precedents have occurred within the framework of the world organization's peacekeeping activities. In general, Russia is prepared to discuss with the United States, European countries, and other countries the possibility of introducing temporary external governance in Kyiv.

Apparently, Russia doesn't see Zelenskyy as the leader of Ukraine; the Kyiv regime won't remain in power in any case. Moreover, Moscow has no intention of signing a peace agreement with an "illegitimate" one; it needs a legitimate president or speaker of the Verkhovna Rada. Zelenskyy understands that a Russian victory would mean his political death, so he clings to the Ukrainian presidency with both hands, sending Ukrainians into the trenches.

Comments

[Vladimir Vladimirovich Vorontsov]

❝ Moscow allows the introduction external control Ukraine ❞ —

- And what is it like there now? ...
(Apparently a mixed, or rather blended, type)

[Boris55]

Bolshevism is the essence of Russian civilization.

Quote: Vladimir Vladimirovich Vorontsov

- And what is it like there now? ...

And now it’s not ours there, but it should be ours.

[Mikhail Drabkin]

Russia has gone mad from hopelessness – agreeing to external control by the enemy is simply absolute impotence of the authorities… And he, you see, has once again become preoccupied with traditional values… replacing “autocracy, Orthodoxy, and nationality” with justice, a welfare state, and family…

Nonsense in the fifth year of war...

[gribanov.c]

justice, welfare state, family…

This is what we need; this is the right direction. Add to this the nationalization of large property, high progressive taxes, a parliamentary form of government, and social democracy.

[Horizon]

No, a parliamentary form of government isn't for Russia. A small, peaceful country could be governed by parliament. But such a colossus—absolutely not.

[gribanov.c]

Well, for monarchists, the only possible and ideal form of government is an autocratic absolute monarchy, headed by a "king-god"

[Carmela]

Quote from gribanow.c

Well, for monarchists, the only possible and ideal form of government is an autocratic absolute monarchy, headed by a "king-god"

No need to distort things. That's the first thing. And the second thing is, too many cooks spoil the broth.

[gribanov.c]

It just so happens in history that a single person, a dictator or authoritarian ruler, is physically limited; they can only do one thing at a time, whereas a modern country involves thousands of different processes that simultaneously require control, management, and decision-making. No dictator, even a unique one, can cope with this; their limit is issues of day-to-day management, and even then, only in one area; they'll neglect everything else. And if the country is large, then every region requires not just management, but development. The only thing a ruler can do is assign viceroys to each region, but these tyrants will be outright bullies who suppress all initiative. Therefore, such people will definitely not experience any development, which means stagnation in all regions and in all spheres, and then degradation. As a result, over 30-50 years such a lag behind the advanced countries will accumulate that it will threaten defeat in the war, and this lag will have to be overcome with the help of emergency measures, but again this leap will be artificial, again everything will stop and freeze at this new level, because a one-man dictatorship does not allow development

[Horizon]

It just so happens in history that one person, a dictator or authoritarian ruler, is limited purely physically; at one moment in time he can do only one thing, but a modern country is thousands of different processes that simultaneously require control, management, and decision-making.

To control, as you say, thousands of different processes in Russia, there is the State Duma, there are regional parliaments, there are local governments.
There is a president elected by the people.
If you don't like the majority's choice, whose problem is it? Mine?

[gribanov.c]

Power isn't a person; power is laws, taxes, elections. If we evaluate it from this perspective, then any official, bureaucrat, or deputy is judged by how well they carry out the will of the people and how well they perform their duties. The people command, and the president carries it out. If he works well, let him do it; if he works poorly, the people remove him, as they appointed him, and no one should complain or object, much less use their powers to oppose the will of the people. If everyone is happy with the work of our government bodies, great, let them do their job—it means the will of the people is there.

[Horizon]

Exactly. Whether this government is doing its job well or not is a different matter. Since people elect this government, it means it enjoys greater trust than its opponents.

[rusmax888]

What if this government surrounded itself with several rings of riot police and the National Guard? Imprisoned and killed everyone who could pose a political challenge to this government? Introduced electronic voting, where people can cast as many votes as they want? Could you please define this government?

[Horizon]

She imprisoned and killed everyone who could pose political competition to this government.

Who is this, for example?

[rusmax888]

You probably don't live in Russia if you can't recall the politicians, political figures, and activists who, from the mid-2000s to the early 2020s, tried to compete and actually won elections in various years during that period. But entry into our "elite club" is open only to our own kind and their daughters and sons.
I hope you are over 18 that you are asking the question: "Who is this, for example?" ))

[Il'nur]

seat their own governors throughout the regions, but they will be outright thugs who suppress any initiative, so there will definitely be no development for them, which means there will be stagnation in all regions and in all spheres, and then degradation

What we have the displeasure of observing is that in all regions and spheres of the "bully" itself, and in all regions and spheres there is stagnation and degradation, with some exceptions...

[Tatyana]

Quote: Ilnur

In all regions and spheres of "bullying" itself, and in all regions and spheres there is stagnation and degradation, with some exceptions...

What do you, as a Russophobic radical Muslim, consider stagnation and degradation, as well as the exclusion of Putin's own "bully" from power, in the area of ​​Russia's development—especially in the Russian Orthodox regions of our country, the Russian Federation?

For example. How do you personally assess this recent incident? Specifically.

Scandal in Serdobsk, Penza Oblast, where the mayor ceremoniously presented housing certificates to "young families" of Central Asian origin, after which absolutely stunning details were revealed.
It turns out, Two wives of one man received particularly large housing certificates — Gadoev Navruzchon Rustamovich, "new Russian" of Tajik origin.
We are talking about Karimova Gandzhina Mirzoradzhabovna and Baatyrbek Kyzy Atimbu, who also received Russian citizenship in different years.
Women's marriages to the head of the family are religious, not official, but this did not prevent them from obtaining two separate housing certificates instead of one.

Actually This fraudulent scheme allowed one foreign family to receive double the amount of government support. And it is unlikely that there was any corruption involved.

Therefore, the Serdobsky District Prosecutor's Office initiated an investigation into the situation. And the city's mayor, Marina Ermakova, hastily resigned.

These stories illustrate how support programs for young families are transformed into tools for exploiting social mechanisms by foreign migrants from the SA, especially where control is formal and illegal.

SEE more - Mubah to life: Two wives of one husband received housing certificates. Published on February 13, 2026. - https://actualno.mirtesen.ru/blog/43061204189/Mubah-v-zhizn-ZHilischnyie-sertifikatyi-poluchili-dve-zhenyi-odn?ysclid=mlo3n5cls0907711128

REFERENCE
Mubakh represents a category of actions and deeds that Sharia views as neutral, necessary, and not requiring any evaluation in themselves. They are neither prohibited nor condemned.
Is this why you, as a Muslim, consider the official secular authorities, as defined by the Constitution of the Russian Federation, to be "bullies"?

[Il'nur]

And what about you, as a Russophobic radical Muslim?

I read your comments with interest and learn a lot of useful things from you...
But here you are mistaken, if the name is Bulgarian, it does not mean that I am a Muslim, much less a radical one...
I was born in Bashkiria, and my views are strongly pro-Russian... To paraphrase the words of I.V. Stalin, I can say: "I am a Russian of Bulgarian origin."
I deeply disapprove of the incident in Serbia, and what's happening in general with regard to the migration of such "specialists," and I condemn the policies of our authorities...
I didn't write "bullies," I wrote it in response to the comment above... I can write that at all levels and spheres of power there are protégés of the same, and I don't entirely agree with the domestic and foreign policies they pursue...
I also don't like the Islamization of the country and the various preferences the authorities give to migrants...

[Tatyana]

Thank you! I have accepted your clarifications!

[Horizon]

Why did you suddenly call me a monarchist? Personally, I am categorically against monarchy in any form.

[Fitter65]

Quote from gribanow.c

Well, for monarchists, the only possible and ideal form of government is an autocratic absolute monarchy, headed by a "king-god"

What didn’t suit you about the General Secretary?

[Patriot is listening]

The US, China and India somehow manage to live without a single vertical

[nik-mazur]

Quote: Patriot is listening

The US, China and India somehow manage to live without a single vertical

Yeah, especially China with its CCP. The US is different in that it has two vertical power structures, not just one. I'm not sure how things are in India, but they say the Brahmins traditionally rule.

[Fitter65]

Quote from gribanow.c

social democracy.

There was a time when they even created a party called the RSDLP, but it didn’t work out.

[gribanov.c]

Social democracy today is certainly not Bolshevism. In a nutshell, social democracy can be described as a "market without billionaires"—that is, an essentially market economy, but with "upper" limits—progressive taxation with a high rate for the highest incomes and a zero rate for the lowest. Today, this would be up to 1 million rubles per year in personal income tax, and all direct taxes for individuals—a 0% rate. For the highest incomes, the rate is 60%, on the entire amount, not on the excess. Nationalization of big business, and the transformation of all large enterprises into joint-stock companies—"people's enterprises"—where the state holds 25-50% of the shares, and the remaining shares are held by minority individual shareholders, with a limit on the number of shares per shareholder, etc. That is, the market, the market economy, private property, small and medium-sized businesses—everything is great, trade, get rich, but up to a certain point—you can't become a billionaire. Being a billionaire is prohibited by law; in fact, it constitutes a crime. If the RSDLP had stuck to such positions, it would have been wonderful, but, unfortunately, it didn't work out.

[Boris55]

Bolshevism is the essence of Russian civilization.

Quote: Mikhail Drabkin

Russia has gone mad from the hopelessness of accepting external control from the enemy – this is simply absolute impotence of the authorities…

What does the government have to do with this? Have you heard anything like that from the authorities? No! And it's no secret that an information war is being waged against us.
One of two things. You are either a victim of this war or an accomplice to it.

[carpenter]

Quote: Mikhail Drabkin

Nonsense in the fifth year of war...

The Russian occupation administration is perfectly capable of handling this task. Wherever the UN intervenes, there's chaos, terror, and disorder.

[Personal opinion]

Kyiv may well declare that it agrees with Russia's position on the impossibility of independently ending the military conflict, and is prepared to accept temporary UN management for Ukraine and Russia until this issue is resolved.

[ser-pov]

What kind of UN is this? That organization discredited itself long ago? Just look at that idiot Guterres's statement that the will of the people of the Donetsk People's Republic, Luhansk People's Republic, and Crimea doesn't count.

[Andrei Nikolaevich]

Guterres and the UN have about as much authority as a train station mutt. Guterres is just there for show... After the test tubes and the bombing of Yugoslavia.

[ARIONkrsk]

Quote: ser-pov

What kind of UN is this? That organization discredited itself long ago? Just look at that idiot Guterres's statement that the will of the people of the Donetsk People's Republic, Luhansk People's Republic, and Crimea doesn't count.

To our authorities, all God's dew.

[ZovSailor]

Vladimir Vladimirovich Vorontsov
Today, 08: 05
And what is it like there now? ...
(Apparently a mixed, or rather blended, type)

I hope this isn't an accurate translation from Russian into international diplomatic parlance, but I don't rule out a provocative gambit launched by the Russian Foreign Ministry to test the opinions of its Anglo-Saxon enemies.

[knn54]

External is the G7 or the State Department or the IMF.

[Hunter 2]

External governance under the auspices of the UN? Are you serious? How and who will drive them out of there later?
Only military commandants, only ours... but we are still far from that.

[saigon]

I'm afraid it's serious. I'm afraid it will all end exactly like this. But it will be presented as an epic victory and triumph.

[nik-mazur]

Quote: Hunter 2

External control under the auspices of the UN? ... Only military commandants, only ours

And where is the contradiction or incompatibility here?

[Hunter 2]

Quote from: nik-mazur

And where is the contradiction or incompatibility here?

There's no need to pretend to be... well, you get the idea. I understand that you approve of everything the government does, but there still has to be a limit?
The UN is a dead organization. Voting there is as it should be and as it pleases (guess who). The Assembly that will make decisions… need I remind you who leads it? This isn't a matter for the UN Security Council, where we can at least veto it, but a matter for the entire UN. Who do you think will lead this "external governance" when all UN members vote? And how will they work, and in whose interests will decisions be made?

[nik-mazur]

Quote: Hunter 2

Who do you think will lead this "external management" when the UN General Assembly votes?

Russia? And if not, we keep fighting. It's all simple, really.

Quote: Hunter 2

And how will they work and in whose interests will decisions be made?

I have no idea what external governance of a state might look like.
If you know, I would like to take a look.

Quote: Hunter 2

Of course, I understand that you approve of everything in relation to the authorities.

You misunderstand.

[Mouse]

Moscow allows for the possibility of introducing external governance in Ukraine after the end of the military conflict and is ready to discuss this issue, said Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Mikhail Galuzin.

As I understand it, it’s temporary, and therefore permanent.

[fiberboard]

Any outcome other than the incorporation of the former Ukraine into Russia is a defeat for the Kremlin (and the "great geopolitician" personally). No negotiations, no "external" management. All this "external" management will end with the Poles seizing Ukrainian territory and creating a new Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth, from "sea to sea." The Poles received western Russian lands for free from the Grand Duchy of Lithuania in the 16th century, as a result of the "Union of Lublin," and now they want to receive them from NATO and the EU under "external management."

[Egoza]

Quote: fiberboard

All this "external control" will end with the seizure of Ukrainian territory by the Poles.

If we allow "external control", then only the kind that Molfar Nechay said!

Transcarpathian Ukraine will be for the Magyars and Czechs. Galicia will be under Poland. Eastern and Central Ukraine will be under Russia, Bukovina will be under Romania.

It's all logical, and let Europe inherit the Bandera remnants. Let NATO deal with them. And we, too, will have to clean and clean.

[fiberboard]

"We don't need an inch of someone else's land, but we won't give up an inch of our own!" The Banderites can go to Canada.

[Montezuma]

Quote: fiberboard

Any result other than the incorporation of the former Ukraine into Russia is a loss, a defeat for the Kremlin (and personally for the “great geopolitician”).

A wonderful comment, catchy and effective. The only remaining task is to ensure control over the entire territory of Ukraine. But that's up to the implementers—the main thing is that the task was firmly set by the zealous commentator. Elena (Egoza)'s comment seems much more realistic.

[fiberboard]

And whoever orchestrated all this had every opportunity in 2014 and even in 2022 to solve the "main task." At their disposal were several million professional combat veterans and retired military personnel, a fairly powerful military-industrial complex, and an adversary whose army was unwilling to resist in 2014—the legitimate President of Ukraine, Viktor Yanukovych. And what do we see? All of this was thrown down the drain to please oligarch "friends," foreign bank accounts and real estate, and the opportunity for the children of the "elite" to live in the countries of the "damned West." And if this entire "company," whose patriotism and genius television is so insistent on convincing us of today, had wanted to, they would have solved this problem. Remember, in February 2024, in Kyiv, weapons were freely distributed to anyone willing to fight against Russia. They didn't even hope for the "gifts" they later received.

[Same lech]

Therefore, Moscow is ready to discuss this proposal.

With Guterres or something?
This fruit has already spoken out on Donbass and Crimea...the Kremlin is playing dangerous games with the UN crooks...they will deceive us again.

[HAM]

The military negotiations in Abu Dhabi yielded no results. The Kremlin realized they wouldn't achieve much, so Medinsky is heading to the next meeting... at least he might be able to reach an agreement regarding the prisoners and dead soldiers... and that's it... the military realized the Kokhlyans are not capable of negotiating.
And all this talk about UN-led governance is for the "poor"... everyone knows perfectly well that won't happen. The UN itself is on its last legs, and it still needs to "govern" someone... it doesn't have the authority it needs, and it doesn't have the power either. And you can "allow" anything... politics and politeness...

[Million]

Moscow will be deceived again. Not for the first time.

[snow mountain]

Quote: Mikhail Drabkin

Nonsense in the fifth year of war...

That's why it's been going on for five years.

[Soldatov V.]

External control can only be allowed from Moscow, or from the Logistics Directorate of the Russian Ministry of Defense and the Counterintelligence Directorate of the FSB.

[TsShVS]

Let Moscow rule.
And who else?

[gribanov.c]

From the very beginning, I was in favor of dividing Ukraine into two states along the "eastern border of the Vinnytsia and Zhytomyr regions"—an eastern Russian state, and a western one, a nest of Bandera supporters, with a military border between them, like between the two Koreas. Conflicts will periodically flare up between them, and then Western countries will support the Western state, and Russia will support the Eastern one. It won't work any other way; these two states will balance each other out, and for that to happen, the eastern state must be very strong, with a large, well-armed and trained army, air force, tanks, drones, and missiles, allied with Russia and Belarus. This state must be the first line of defense from the West, a militarized state, purely Russian.

[deathtiny]

To achieve this, a hypothetical "Novorossiya" should have been created from the very beginning, rather than constitutionally annexing the LPR, DPR, Z, and Kh. Then there would have been room to maneuver (and Russia wouldn't have been dealing with reconstruction and social security). But now it's too late.

[foxes]

Is this what they call "every next Russian peace proposal will be worse than the last"? So far, the only proposals that are getting worse are those for Russia, and from its own "politicians," at that.

[alexboguslavski]

External management ......................... under the auspices of the UN is not new.

It was under the auspices of the UN that the Korean War of 1950 was unleashed.

[Ture-Dog]

Zaluzhny is leading in all the ratings there, but he's on our wanted list. Should we negotiate with him?
By the way, the fact that Zaluzhny is the favorite of the pig tribe says a lot about whether the pigs are truly "tired" of war.

[deathtiny]

Quote: Ture-Dog

Should I negotiate with him?

Easy! We considered both the Taliban and the current Syrian leader to be "extremist terrorists."
Changing your status for a favorable contract is a matter of one day.

[Anthony]

Quote: Michael Drabkin

Russia has gone mad from hopelessness – agreeing to external control by the enemy is simply absolute impotence of the authorities… And he, you see, has once again become preoccupied with traditional values… replacing “autocracy, Orthodoxy, and nationality” with justice, a welfare state, and family…

Nonsense in the fifth year of war...

That's right. While they're dividing the skin of an unkilled bear - Hot water supply to Belgorod homes with centralized heating systems will not be restored until the end of the heating season, according to regional Governor Vyacheslav Gladkov. (heating too, I understand)

[SEVERIN]

Essentially, the UN could assume temporary governance of the country until proper presidential and parliamentary elections are held, TASS reports. A peace agreement could then be reached with the elected president.

- And Russia is ready to entrust the external governance of Ukraine to just anyone??? - For this, it is necessary to sacrifice many lives and four years of war??? - This is treason!

[deathtiny]

Well, yes, we can fight for another 10 years, lose hundreds of thousands more, drive the people into poverty, but at least it won’t be treason.

[SEVERIN]

You Ukrainian monkey quickly forgot how our fathers and grandfathers beat the German scum in Ukraine and finished them off in Berlin. Soon you unscrupulously began to worry about your own skin, which is closer to your sweaty body. Well, you still have to run around the Carpathians, sit in hiding places, and this time they won’t stand on ceremony with you villagers.

[PavelKosse]

Finally, some sensible thoughts have emerged from the leadership. External management (obviously referring to a Russian interim administration) is what we should be negotiating now, if we're even worth negotiating at all. This is what we're talking about, not what guarantees Ukraine will receive, what compensation it will receive from our frozen assets, and which territories we'll have to withdraw from under the so-called "spirit of anchorage." It's not a given that we'll be allowed to do this right now, but at the very least, it's a decent negotiating position for us. If this option doesn't work, we'll press on. And, yes, we ask representatives of Western powers not to worry about participating in this administration. Their security forces are our legitimate target, just in case.

[SEVERIN]

External management (obviously referring to the Russian temporary administration)

- it's not at all obvious, knowing that the external governance of Ukraine will be under the auspices of the UN, that this will be a two- or even three-way process.

[PavelKosse]

This needs to be discussed. And, after all, post-war Germany was divided between the allies. Fascist Italy and Spain, and militaristic Japan were left out. Now, point by point. Our ally, the DPRK, is also a member of the UN. And China is also on board, if it changes its gait a bit. Not to mention, the UN itself, in the current reality, could suffer the same fate as the "League of Nations."
And for these wishes of mine (ours) to come true, we need to be more restrained in the negotiations. The "we agree to everything" approach is no longer viable, given the number of losses and the current situation in Belgorod. And before each round, we could show off Oreshnik and Burevestnik instead of K. Dmitriev's sweet rye. Maybe something will come of it.

[SEVERIN]

Pavel Kosse, This needs to be discussed. And in the end, post-war Germany was divided between the allies.

- that's not entirely true - the Allies discussed Germany's fate in 1945 because, for better or worse, they were officially at war with Germany, but now they are officially not involved, which means they have no right to discuss anything.

[phrases]

They're getting worked up again. Not only does the sheriff not listen to the Indians' opinions, but the Indians themselves are only needed to fulfill wishes. The sheriff gave the order, the Indians ran and did it. No discussion. Go discuss some new wonder weapon.

[PavelKosse]

Now R. Kadyrov will be elected as the new president of the Russian Federation, you will get a wunder, you will get a waffle... "and cocoa with tea."
Or, more pressing: "...personnel decides everything. Remember, Lavrenty!"

[likana]

The UN itself is under external control, and the Russian Foreign Ministry's naivety is off the charts. Or are they rushing around searching for a solution out of sheer impotence? Their liberal instincts prevent them from admitting mistakes and starting a real war. The CBO format has failed, and the penchant for compromise has cost thousands of lives.

[PavelKosse]

I gave you a thumbs up. This concerns our Foreign Ministry, which is certainly not involved in the current SVO. But where they're really rushing around is in the enemy camp. And it looks like there'll soon be no one left to fight on their side, and the question is, where will they get their money? That's why all this fuss about negotiations. They're really pushing ahead at any cost. The situation, unfortunately, is reminiscent of the end of the Russo-Japanese War, where Russia only brought up its reserves, while Japan was already running out of money. And the "peacekeeping" was forced upon us by those same Americans. And they're still not letting up. And now we prioritize negotiations. And it cost thousands of lives, yes. And it will cost even more in the future if we now fall for the mantras of our liberal quasi-elites and sign anything with the Judases.

[Vadim Isaev]

No conclusions have been drawn from the OSCE's actions in Ukraine, nor from PACE. The UN will suffer the same, perhaps even worse. The conclusion is clear: officials need lucrative jobs.

[Dinic]

Russia is ready to discuss with the United States, European and other countries the possibility of introducing temporary external control in Kyiv.

A new level of self-abasement.

[Ghost1]

In my opinion, such proposals are still a long way off.

[Personal opinion]

The Kremlin should be focusing first and foremost on resolving issues of state building and governance in our country. That's where the bulk of the work lies.
The entire police system is designed for one person, while the rest of its elements are purely sham. And life has shown what this leads to.

[PavelKosse]

Before 1941, the USSR thought the same way. They were building the economy and developing the country. They put forward the idea that it was possible to live under socialism while living in a hostile environment, with the openly terrorist Hitler regime right next door. Doesn't that ring a bell?!
In general, life showed this then and now...

[musorg]

Until Kyiv holds proper elections. And what does "proper" even mean? And can the UN, or the US, be trusted to manage this? One stupidity on top of another equals stupidity squared! If we don't have the reserves for major operations or the ability to force Kyiv to capitulate, then there's no objection, but we've lost, and the West will say so!

[PavelKosse]

In the late 1940s, elections were organized and held in East Germany. They found a pool of candidates to choose from. As a result, the GDR was formed, a state under our control. Something similar happened in the FRG. But we weren't in control there. Ultimately, the Bundeswehr was formed from Wehrmacht and SS veterans. Feel the difference.

[Incvizitor]

Until there is a legitimate pro-Russian government there, there will be no one to talk to and nothing to talk about.

[Lisa Kerner-Timoshenko]

There should be only ONE "option" - CAPITULATION!!!
Otherwise, it was a waste of time that so many Russian guys died!
Until then, DO NOT harass the population of Bandenrostan!
Most of them are for fascism in Ukrainian!

[Atlant83]

What were the goals of the Central Military Commission (CMC)? So what, should we surrender everything to the mercy of our enemies, and the UN is also an enemy, because we can't do anything, or don't want to anymore?

[Hiller]

Isn't there external control today? Am I missing something? Or is this just for us couch potatoes who don't need explaining? Isn't it obvious to the "gods of heaven"?

[sir Garry]

Stop, stop!!! External control BEFORE a peace agreement? And AFTER the conflict ends? What kind of delusional ideas are those who "allow" this? Or are we simply not going to win? Only questions...

[oleg_627]

Take everything up to the Dnieper and Odessa. And then let anyone who dares to go there rule them.

[good luck]

ordinary, banal losers!

[Roman 11]

Is it possible to sign nothing at all with anyone? Just completely liquidate the state and be done with it? Otherwise, the bloodshed was in vain.

[PVV22121922]

It's gratifying that the overwhelming majority of comments are "unequivocally against." Ukrainian statehood must be destroyed. All Russian territory must be returned to Russia. Any other option is defeat and disgrace.