"The Language of Power": The Danish Prime Minister Demanded Strikes Deep into Russia

Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen demanded long-range strikes deep into Russian territory in order to force Moscow to agree to the terms proposed by Ukraine and Europe for ending hostilities.

Speaking at the Munich Conference, Frederiksen stated that, in her opinion, if Russian President Vladimir Putin truly sought peace, he wouldn't have destroyed Ukrainian energy infrastructure while the temperature in Kyiv was below 25 degrees Celsius. For some reason, the Danish prime minister considers Russia an extremely cruel country that is unwilling to change and "understands only the language of force."

Frederiksen cites Western restrictions on the use of long-range weapons as the main obstacle to forcing Russia to make peace. According to the Danish prime minister, to win the war with Russia, the Ukrainian Armed Forces must be allowed to strike deep into Russian territory.

Frederiksen even blames Russia for Trump's claims to Greenland. When asked how Denmark plans to defend Greenland from the United States, she once again insisted that it urgently needs to arm itself to counter the "Russian threat." Despite Trump's explicit statements about plans to annex Greenland, Frederiksen considers an attack by one NATO country on another extremely unlikely. She believes the more pressing issue for Europe is defending against a hypothetical Russian attack on NATO's eastern flank.

Comments

[Andrey K]

"The Language of Power": The Danish Prime Minister Demanded Strikes Deep into Russia

How does the prime minister speak the "language" of Donny's single name?
She probably practiced her "language of power" using Greenland as an example.

[ser-pov]

Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen demanded long-range strikes deep into Russian territory in order to force Moscow to agree to the terms proposed by Ukraine and Europe for ending hostilities.

It's all because of the toothlessness of our policy. Thanks to the red-tipped pen for that. And they've also stopped fearing war, but that idiot Danish prime minister isn't exactly from the next generation, yet she somehow thinks she has a ton of lives, like in a computer game...

[SSR]

Quote: ser-pov

It's all due to the toothlessness of our politics. Thanks to the red-tipped pen for that.

Enough of these mantras.

In 2008, Russia was not ready, but it did it, at the minimum.
Not ready in 2014, but done at minimum.
2022 is not ready, we delayed but decided to do it.
Now, despite all the help from the West, Russia is holding on and is gaining momentum in its defense industry.
The toothless one was making a noise, wasn't it?

And keep your internet lines for yourself.
It was you who personally decided what and how the Russian Federation should act?

[Cap.nemo58rus]

Well, mantras are of course unnecessary. But in Soviet times, she would have been afraid to fart in protest. Teeth are needed in diplomacy, too. Just remember "Mr. No One."

[your1970]

Quote: Cap.Nemo58rus

But in Soviet times she would have been afraid to fart as a sign of protest.

Quote: Cap.Nemo58rus

Teeth are needed in diplomacy too. Just remember "Mr. No."

Remind me in which pocket of the USSR they were insertable teeth at the moment of the Tuapse capture or at the moment of Damansky or at the moment of China's supply of weapons to the spirits with CIA money?
A couple of strategic missiles should have been launched at Taiwan behind the Tuapse.
Everyone would still remember that Russia CAN , and not mumble Mr. "No" with your teeth

[alexoff]

Remind me which pocket the USSR had its false teeth in when the Tuapse was captured.

Back then, the Taiwanese were grabbing everyone they could, even killing a British captain. Until they captured a Soviet tanker and the USSR sent several ships toward the island. Plus, Mr. No was able to get the Swedish Red Cross and a bunch of other foreigners to stick up for our guys.

[your1970]

Quote from alexoff

Remind me which pocket the USSR had its false teeth in when the Tuapse was captured.

Back then, the Taiwanese were grabbing everyone they could, even killing a British captain. Until they captured a Soviet tanker and the USSR sent several ships toward the island. Plus, Mr. No was able to get the Swedish Red Cross and a bunch of other foreigners to stick up for our guys.

Some sailors from the Tuapse lived there for 34 years - without wanting to!!!
I repeat - the height of the USSR's power in relation to Taiwan is the "Taiwanese rattle" of Kukryniksy in "Crocodile"

[alexoff]

Are these the sailors who signed the asylum application, one way or another? Well, that's not surprising; the USSR welcomed them with open arms, much like former police officers.

[your1970]

Quote from alexoff

Are these the sailors who signed the asylum application, one way or another? Well, that's not surprising; the USSR welcomed them with open arms, much like former police officers.

The problem is that they repeatedly appealed to the Taiwanese to hand them over to the USSR. Only Taiwan for some reason didn't want this....

[Cap.nemo58rus]

Please don't distort things. Don't confuse the warm with the soft, the nineties with the sixties, the seventies. Shelepin (Gromyko's predecessor as Foreign Minister) compared him to a bulldog. If they tell him to, he won't let go.

[your1970]

Quote: Cap.Nemo58rus

Don't confuse warm with soft, the nineties with the sixties, the seventies.

"Tuapse"- 1954 (!!!!!!!)What the hell are the nineties????

[Cap.nemo58rus]

That's not what I'm talking about at all. Do you need a reminder of the list of shortcomings of the modern Russian government? I'll get tired of typing... "Omissions" is putting it mildly.

[your1970]

Quote: Cap.Nemo58rus

Need I remind you of the list of shortcomings of the modern Russian government? I'm tired of typing...

Do you need a reminder of the list of shortcomings of the Soviet government? I'll keep repeating it, but in short: there is no USSR...not at all.

And then, damn, those great "bulldogs" - fucking Ghana, Argentina and Taiwan captured USSR ships, China spent 3 years killing border guards and selling weapons to the dukhs on CIA money, in Poland, Walesa was screwing the government, the Czechs and Hungarians were trying to overthrow the government...

[Cap.nemo58rus]

Everything is clear with you. I have no desire to argue.

[your1970]

Quote: Cap.Nemo58rus

Everything is clear with you. I have no desire to argue.

And with you, everything is clear - everything is bad now, "But in the USSR, the grass was green, 3 meters high..."
Let me repeat: the list of the USSR's shortcomings is significantly longer precisely because it no longer exists—no longer exists. Once the Russian Federation is gone, we can discuss which of them screwed up more...

[Cap.nemo58rus]

Wow, how far things have gone... Russia will be gone, and there won't be anything to discuss. And there won't be anyone to discuss it.

[your1970]

Quote: Cap.Nemo58rus

Wow, how far things have gone... Russia will be gone, and there won't be anything to discuss. And there won't be anyone to discuss it.

This isn't for me - here crowds are running around the VO shouting, "What if the USSR comes and just escalate everything?!" (in various forms of severity)

[Cap.nemo58rus]

You're confused, I didn't say anything about the USSR coming. Water doesn't flow uphill. Dreaming about it is nonsense.

[single-n]

Oh, the universe will end with the collapse of the Russian Federation. And bigger countries have collapsed. We're doing just fine.
The list of the USSR's sins is longer because the sources are open and can be discussed without fear. No one will come and tell you to go to hell for loving your homeland. At best. Otherwise, you could drown in the bathtub. If you find something truly interesting and important.

[Ban Zai]

Here's Mark Solonin's follower on the site😁, he's a good judge of the omissions, gifted beyond his years, clicks comparable to the tonnage of the shadow fleet

[your1970]

Quote: Ban Zai

Here's Mark Solonin's follower on the site😁, he's a good judge of the omissions, gifted beyond his years, clicks comparable to the tonnage of the shadow fleet

Well, if we're talking about "gifted" by "for years" it doesn't occur to them that states are perishing only Because of the government's shortcomings, there's no other choice, we have to explain

[Ban Zai]

Tell me, you armchair smartass, about the current situation, but keep your mouth shut about the USSR, you expert on power.

[Cap.nemo58rus]

L - logic. Not a single country has ever perished from acute respiratory infections...

[your1970]

Quote: Cap.Nemo58rus

L - logic. Not a single country has ever perished from acute respiratory infections...

You talked about

Quote: Cap.Nemo58rus

Do you need a reminder of the list of shortcomings of the modern Russian government? I'm tired of typing... "Omissions" is an understatement.

Nevertheless, the Russian Federation exists - but the USSR does not, not at all.
That is you

Quote: Cap.Nemo58rus

Not a single state has perished from acute respiratory infections...

We agree that there were more shortcomings in the USSR.
Well, he didn't die from an acute respiratory infection.

[Cap.nemo58rus]

No, I disagree. There are a multitude of reasons, so I think the discussion is too drawn-out. We can argue endlessly. With all due respect.

[your1970]

Quote: Cap.Nemo58rus

No, I don't agree.

Your first sentence contradicts the second.

Quote: Cap.Nemo58rus

There are a lot of reasons

You write that There are no omissions, but there were reasons for the collapse. - this is just a manipulation of terms

[Cap.nemo58rus]

This troll is driving me crazy... Get off my back with your manipulations. Admins, please make a block user button...

[your1970]

Quote: Cap.Nemo58rus

This troll is driving me crazy... Get off my back with your manipulations. Admins, please make a block user button...

Nobody bothered you - You're driving yourself into a dead end...

Quote: Cap.Nemo58rus

Admins, please make a block user button...

Then there will be no one left here - first the Sovietophiles will block everyone who doesn't agree that

Quote: your1970

Nowadays everything is bad, "But in the USSR the grass was green, 3 meters high..."

- and then, as happened in history, they will begin to block each other - deviators, voluntarists, Trotskyists, communists, Bolsheviks.
Moreover, the Stalinists will block all the Trotskyists in one day.

[nik-mazur]

Quote: your1970

And everything is clear with you too

Just yesterday I came across the term "necropatriots", which very expressively characterizes ardent admirers of the USSR (may it rest in peace).

Quote: your1970

In the USSR, the grass was green, about 3 meters high.

And what classmates were like then - thin, loud, playful... not like now - old bags, at whom you can’t look without tears.

[alexoff]

But diplomacy right now – wow! Someone who likes to give themselves upvotes will probably tell you about it now.

[nik-mazur]

Quote from alexoff

But now diplomacy is - wow.

The fact that things are not great now doesn’t mean that everything was great during the Soviet era.
Generally speaking, as they say, diplomacy is the art of the possible. This means that diplomatic success is not an absolute concept, but a relative one, determined by the balance between possibilities and results.

[alexoff]

In general, as they say: diplomacy is the art of the possible.

And how are things going? How much of what was possible have you accomplished?

[nik-mazur]

Quote from alexoff

and how are the successes

I have no idea. I have neither the information nor the expertise to evaluate it, nor the self-esteem to care.

[RedEran]

I repeat - the list of shortcomings of the USSR is much longer

Still no, that's why the USSR's authority on the international arena was higher))

And yes, the USSR wasn't a powerful superpower that could decide everything in the world with a snap of its fingers. There were also incidents, as you mentioned above. Nowadays, similar situations occur, for example, between the Americans and the Houthis or Iran, or even occasionally with Russia. But GLOBALLY, no one in the world wants to be hostile to the Americans or make openly anti-American statements, not even Denmark, which is in near-direct conflict with them.
It was the same with the USSR; everyone understood that the country could lose one thing, two things, three things, but if it got the flywheel going, it would be demolished.
Plus, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs really knew how to work and prevent many conflicts.
There were real allies who also had weight in the world, the same GDR, the fact that we later betrayed them ourselves is another question.

And with all of the above, we have real problems, unfortunately.

And this is exactly what they want to convey to you.

[nik-mazur]

Quote: RedEran

There were real allies who also had weight in the world.

Hungary in 1956, Czechoslovakia in 1968, Polish Solidarity in 1981, the demolition of the Berlin Wall in 1989.
The allies were powerful and loyal, of course, to the fullest extent of their ability, as they say...

[RedEran]

How long did it take to resolve the issue with Hungary in 1956 and Czechoslovakia in 1968?
Milke proposed to the Soviet leadership to solve the problem with Poland, Jaruzelski and the Soviet leadership decided not to repeat 1939.
The fall of the wall was the result of the betrayal of OUR elites, the GDR National People's Army was ready to restore order in a matter of days.

Whose intelligence service is now supplying us with information at the Stasi level?
Whose army is ready to fulfill its allied obligations even when it is told not to?
Do we now have 8 countries that are guaranteed to support any decision we make, and that these countries' influence in the world would be greater than that of Mali and Mozambique?
When important events, from sporting to political, are cancelled in Russia, are there 14 countries guaranteed to send their delegations?
Are there any neighbors now who generally favor good neighborly relations with us?
Do Germany and France, despite all their differences, strive to get closer to us?

And yes, let's not forget that the USSR maintained, for example, air traffic with the entire world, even during the Cuban Missile Crisis and the introduction of troops into Afghanistan.
And at the level of cultural contacts, the USSR was presented throughout the world with a positive sign; the notorious “cancellation of Russian culture” was also not observed.

So whose diplomacy worked better?

[nik-mazur]

Quote: RedEran

The fall of the wall is the result of betrayal by OUR elites... So whose diplomacy worked better?

Good question. Especially considering that it wasn't just the Berlin Wall that fell then.

[RedEran]

And you don’t resort to sophistry))
Everyone confirms that the late USSR was a pale shadow of its former self. Everyone also knows that Gorbachev wasn't the kind of leader to preserve anything, and that this began, at a minimum, with Andropov.

You and your associate are still being told here about the golden age of the USSR, like the Brezhnev era (so to speak), and at that point, Soviet diplomacy, and more, was a thousand heads above our current level. And I've given you examples.

[nik-mazur]

Quote: RedEran

Everyone confirms that the late USSR was a pale shadow of its former self.

And whose diplomacy worked better that this happened?
Incidentally, only three years passed between Brezhnev's "golden" era and Gorbachev's era of betrayal. And if we count the beginning of the decline from Andropov, it's only two days – Brezhnev died on November 10, 1982, and Andropov became General Secretary on November 12.

[RedEran]

You can pump something up in one day, we have seen such examples.
Once again, Soviet diplomacy worked better than modern diplomacy in the Russian Federation, I have clearly explained this twice above.
Even the diplomacy of the late crisis-ridden 1980s and early 1990s at least somehow lived up to its name.

[nik-mazur]

Quote: RedEran

Soviet diplomacy worked better than modern diplomacy in Russia.

No, you simply described the historical context, so to speak, attributing it exclusively to diplomatic work. Which, to put it mildly, is not entirely true. You didn't cite any specific successes of Soviet diplomacy. Nor did you cite any failures of Russian diplomacy.

[RedEran]

Well, open your eyes and read it again!
There were concrete successes, at least in the fact that the Soviet Union had allies among countries and supporters in political circles on the opposing side. In the fact that the Soviet voice was heard and listened to, and accepted, on the other side of the socialist camp. Should I delve into the details? With references to Stern and Der Spiegel? Or will you understand what I mean?

Modern Russian diplomacy HAS NOT A SINGLE ALLY in Europe. And for a long time. Russian culture has been abolished, and for a long time. What can I say, Merkel proposed visa abolition at the turn of the 2000s, and our diplomacy couldn't even follow through on that. Moreover, it performed so poorly that Europe is even considering tightening it. We are at odds with all our neighbors, even those who were loyal to us.

Since the 1960s, we've been drawing closer to the world in science, culture, and religion. Over the last 15 years, we've squandered all the decades' worth of achievements in these areas. And that was what constituted soft power.

Do you really want to know in detail the achievements of Soviet diplomacy and the failures of modern diplomacy?

And yes, this “historical context” of yours was possible precisely thanks to Soviet diplomats.

[nik-mazur]

Quote: RedEran

The Soviet Union had allies among countries and supporters in political circles of the opposing camp

These allies fled as soon as the Soviet Union collapsed, and some even earlier.

Quote: RedEran

We are at odds with all our neighbors, even those who were loyal to us.

Do you really think that Russian diplomacy is solely responsible for this?

Quote: RedEran

Do you really want to know in detail about the achievements of Soviet diplomacy and the failures of modern diplomacy?

I'd prefer the opposite: that you talk about the successes of Russian diplomacy and the failures of Soviet diplomacy. Just to understand the level of bias.

[nik-mazur]

Quote: Cap.Nemo58rus

Do you need a reminder of the list of shortcomings of the modern Russian government? I'm tired of typing.

Let's start by reminding you of the Soviet regime's shortcomings. I'm afraid you'll not only get tired, but your hands will fall off typing it all.

[Cap.nemo58rus]

Everything's clear with you too. Do you have a medal from 1991? For defending democracy. Do you live in the capital?

[nik-mazur]

Quote: Cap.Nemo58rus

Do you have a medal issued in 1991?

I didn't even know these existed.
By the way, how do you know about this?

Quote: Cap.Nemo58rus

Do you live in the capital?

Why do you care? I, for example, couldn't care less where you live.

[Cap.nemo58rus]

I thought you were older than those born in 80. I don't care where you live, but your reasoning is very similar to that of Moscow residents for whom Saransk is a foreign country.

[Cap.nemo58rus]

The "Defender of a Free Russia" medal is awarded by the President of the Russian Federation. It is presented to citizens of the Russian Federation, foreign citizens, and stateless persons for courage demonstrated in defending the constitutional order during the attempted coup d'état of August 19–21, 1991, for their contributions to democratic reform, economic and political reform, strengthening Russian statehood, and for their contribution to resolving national issues.

By the way, Basayev was also awarded this medal.

[Cap.nemo58rus]

So they've pounced on anyone who still hasn't turned off the lights. They're really screwing it. They turn on the electricity at night.

[nik-mazur]

Quote: Cap.Nemo58rus

I thought you were older than 80.

That's right. Does this affect anything?

Quote: Cap.Nemo58rus

Your reasoning is very similar to that of the capital's residents

Are you one of those for whom Moscow is not Russia, and Muscovites, therefore, are not fellow citizens?
And by the way, which of my arguments are incompatible with Saransk?

Quote: Cap.Nemo58rus

"To the Defender of a Free Russia"

This is the first time I've heard of this.

Quote: Cap.Nemo58rus

At night they turn on electricity

The man wrote at half past two in the morning.

[Cap.nemo58rus]

Do you use a search engine? I guess so. Well, google it. What are you trolling here? I don't know... I haven't heard of it.

[nik-mazur]

Quote: Cap.Nemo58rus

Well, then, go ahead and rant.

What exactly are you suggesting I google?

[Cap.nemo58rus]

What did you ask? Google it.

[nik-mazur]

Quote: Cap.Nemo58rus

What did you ask? Google it.

I asked, what does my age mean? And aren't you one of those for whom Moscow isn't Russia? And which of my arguments specifically are incompatible with the Saransk mentality?
Google is unlikely to be able to answer these questions. And even AI won't help.

[Cap.nemo58rus]

Yes, I'm one of those people. Moscow and Russia are different countries now. Who are the people from Saryn? AI certainly won't help us, people from outside the Moscow Ring Road. We're relying only on ourselves.

[nik-mazur]

Quote: Cap.Nemo58rus

Yes, I'm one of those people. Moscow and Russia are different countries now.

A rather vile thesis, actually. It's unclear why so many people like it so much.

Quote: Cap.Nemo58rus

Who are the Saryn people?

Well, you encouraged me to use search engines, but you yourself don’t know how:

Saranchans (male version – saranchanin, female – saranchanka) – this is what the residents of Saransk are called

[Cap.nemo58rus]

For a Muscovite, it might be vile, but for someone from the Moscow Ring Road, it's just right. I'm right, you can always recognize a Muscovite by his habits. Saransk just happened to be there. That's why I didn't understand you. Muscovites aren't liked in Russia, and that was the case in the army too. They deserved it.

[nik-mazur]

Quote: Cap.Nemo58rus

For a Muscovite it may be disgusting, but for someone from the Moscow Ring Road it’s just right.

It's disgusting for anyone, if you think about it, of course. If you don't think about it, then everything is fine.

Quote: Cap.Nemo58rus

You can always recognize a Muscovite by his habits

Yes, I'm from Siberia, actually.
That's why I say that dividing fellow citizens into different classes depending on where they live is a vicious practice.
In general, treating people based on factors that are beyond their control is very bad.
And by the way, I'm incredibly curious: what are the habits by which you recognize Muscovites? What do they have that residents of St. Petersburg, Kostroma, or the Irkutsk region don't?

Quote: Cap.Nemo58rus

Muscovites are not liked in Russia, and this happened in the army too.

Who was loved in the army? And who is loved in Russia?

[Sansan]

Guys, is "tuapse" a diagnosis?

[Dedok]

Shelepin (Gromyko's predecessor as head of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs) compared him to a bulldog.

Who appointed Shelepin to this position?
and when?
If Gromyko was the USSR's Minister of Foreign Affairs from 1957 to 1985...

[Cap.nemo58rus]

My apologies, Shepilov. I was thinking one thing and wrote another. It happens, don't judge me too harshly.

[single-n]

Comparing the seizure of one vessel and a dozen people with the regular shelling of half the country, with hundreds of civilians killed and thousands wounded. Countless military personnel. Plus attacks on nuclear facilities and nuclear forces, including an attack on the residence of the head of state.
Well, it's basically the same thing. Give examples of something similar during the Soviet era.

[your1970]

Quote: Single-n

Comparing the seizure of one vessel and a dozen people with the regular shelling of half the country, with hundreds of civilians killed and thousands wounded. Countless military personnel. Plus attacks on nuclear facilities and nuclear forces, including an attack on the residence of the head of state.
Well, it's basically the same thing. Give examples of something similar during the Soviet era.

And this is obvious - the West NOT He considered the USSR the real enemy. The USSR sat quietly, didn't assert its rights, stole resources—and for pennies at that—and only intrusted into strictly designated areas in Africa, posed no competition to the West, and had no money.

[single-n]

He did. Of course he did. He was scared to death of it. Need I remind you about Korea, China, Vietnam, Cuba?
The main danger for the Western world was the very idea of ​​a different world order. That's what made the USSR so scary. If they overdid it somewhere, communist cells would spring up, and then it wouldn't be long before they received help from the USSR. The West simply chose the same tactics: destabilizing from within and pressuring economically without engaging in direct conflict. And when the USSR saw a new generation of party members, who no longer dreamed of a global revolution and the good of all, but of securing their privileges for life and becoming local tsars, the USSR itself crumbled. Especially since the whole NATO threat was perceived as a joke. We're a real joke! We're a hot rodder and we even defeated Hitler! Those half-witted Yankees are no match for us. The echoes of that idiotic arrogance are still alive. Well, the SVO has started to clear our heads. Despite all the propaganda efforts. Our leader, by the way, as a man of that era, fell into this ideological trap. Special thanks to that weirdo Dugin with his national chosenness complex. Who else did VVP read? Ilyin? He's the same old vegetable, only on the other side.

[your1970]

Quote: Single-n

He counted. Of course he did. He was afraid of him to the point of screaming.

Quote: Single-n

Korea

The USSR did not fight

Quote: Single-n

Vietnam

Afghanistan conversely, in large volumes - but no more.

Quote: Single-n

Cuba

The USSR launched its missiles six months earlier than the US, not at the same time or later.
This was a concession for the US, which withdrew its missiles only six months later.

Quote: Single-n

China

Which, throughout its entire post-war history, tried to fight little by little with the USSR?
"Upper Volta with Rockets" - West seriously considered the USSR to be like that.

[single-n]

And whose weapons and military specialists were there? Who trained and supplied them?
The fact that we had our own frictions with China does not change the fact that the alliance between China and the USSR frightened NATO.
If we were so wretched and weak, then why did NATO build such an army? Why did all of Europe surrender to the US just to be protected from the terrible danger from the East? Look at the literature of those years. Every third work there, immediately after the first, mentions the communist threat.
And about Cuba, point out that the US immediately lifted the blockade and forced all its mongrels to do the same. They also provided security guarantees to Cuba. And then they removed the missiles.
Maybe we can compare this to crying: "We were deceived-e-e-e, whine, whine"?
The USSR forced them to remove their missiles and defended their ally. And now what are we doing? We're not reducing the threat, and we're losing allies. We can't do a damn thing, and they're being picked off one by one.

[your1970]

Quote: Single-n

So why did NATO build such an army? Why did all of Europe surrender to the US just to be protected from the terrible danger from the East? Look at the literature of those years. Every third work there, immediately after the first, mentions the communist threat.

Now remember the 3 most profitable businesses in the world - that's right: prostitution, drugs and weapons.
Weapon massively are purchasing in the face of threat.
Who could have scared Europe then? Would anyone have believed about the threat from Africa or Spain or something?
And then - a fat lump of dough - "The Communist threat!!! The USSR will attack!!! Soviet tanks are washing their tracks in the English Channel!!" (c)
Do you seriously think the USSR wants to attack NATO??!! The USSR barely managed to corral its allies – when they were getting their crust wet – for the entire 40 years after the war...
He had no time for the occupation of Europe.
And now, following exactly the same pattern, the West is shouting about Russia military threat - although it is significantly less than the Soviet one.
The West doesn't care about the regime in the USSR/Russia - they need a pseudo-"threat"

Quote: Single-n

And about Cuba, point out that the US immediately lifted the blockade and forced all its mongrels to do the same. They also provided security guarantees to Cuba. And then they removed the missiles.

Why did they send missiles to Cuba? Was it for Cuba's sake? Home The USSR's primary goal was to remove the missiles from Turkey, and the blockade of Cuba was secondary. And the US understood this perfectly well, delaying the missiles until the last minute.

[single-n]

Today, Russia is a pitiful sight, fit only to scare soybean millennials in the EU. The USSR, along with the Comecon bloc, is a completely different balance of power. Soviet tanks could easily have reached the English Channel. Fortunately, the channel is only 800 km from Berlin.
And if no one feared the USSR, then give examples of the bombing of Soviet cities. Was the mighty NATO really so afraid of "upper volt with missiles"? Did anyone dare to seize Soviet assets? Not minor incidents, but like this—on a grand scale? Did anyone even mention a blockade? Did they even yelp about reparations? Did the USSR's merchant fleet have to hide? They were as silent as mice under a broom.
And they removed the missiles, but what about today? They're practically wiping their feet on Russia. Damn those red-lined guys.

[nik-mazur]

Quote: Single-n

Soviet tanks could well have reached the English Channel.

But they didn't make it. By your logic, they were probably very afraid of NATO.

Quote: Single-n

Maybe someone there took the risk of seizing the USSR's assets?

Someone took the risk of declaring the entire USSR an Evil Empire and ultimately destroying it, and then plundering it.

[alexoff]

Someone risked declaring the entire USSR

And what did they call the Russian Federation? Perhaps Russian diplomacy put them in their place?

[nik-mazur]

Quote from alexoff

And what did they call the Russian Federation?

Well, something like Mordor, as far as I understand. Why?

Quote from alexoff

Perhaps Russian diplomacy put such people in their place?

Well, in much the same way that Soviet diplomacy put those who called the USSR the Evil Empire in their place. That is, nothing. At the very least, because diplomacy doesn't do that.

[alexoff]

Well, something like Mordor, as far as I understand. Why?

So what? And nothing.

At the very least, because diplomacy doesn’t deal with this.

So will there be something about Russian diplomacy, any specifics?

[nik-mazur]

Quote from alexoff

And nothing

That's what I'm talking about: nothing.

Quote from alexoff

There will be something about Russian diplomacy, some specifics.

No. Should there be? I don't remember making any promises.

[single-n]

But two generations lived without bombing. Something Russia failed to do.

[nik-mazur]

Quote: Single-n

But two generations lived without bombings.

The ten years of the holy, wild nineties, brought about by the grace of the Soviet ruling class, more than compensated for the lack of bombing. And in the first thirty years of Soviet power, the bombings were such that God forbid, Russia avoided them.
Incidentally, Western Europe, just like the Soviet Union, has lived without bombing since 1945. And it still does. And the United States has been living like this for almost two hundred years.
In general, the argument is this... it’s not very clear in favor of what.

[single-n]

The civil war of 1917-1922, caused by the bourgeois ruling class and the invasion of foreign armies, more than outweighs the 1990s. And yet, in just five years, the USSR reassembled virtually the entire Russian empire. Fifteen years later, it had industrialized. Thirty years later, it had crushed the most powerful army on the planet and extended its influence over half of Europe and half of Asia.

What's Russia's record? Four years of fighting and we still can't take two regions? Awesome!
Oh yeah. We're also bringing in millions of migrants, and our own are dying at a terrible rate. It's because life is too good, I suppose.

[nik-mazur]

Quote: Single-n

The civil war of 1917-1922 occurred due to the mercy of the bourgeois ruling class

In fact, the Civil War began in 1918, and the Bolsheviks were in power at the time. This, in fact, was the cause of the Civil War—not everyone in the country agreed with their method of seizing power and their methods of governance.

Quote: Single-n

The USSR reassembled almost the entire Russian empire in just 5 years.

And where is the USSR now, with the Russian Empire it has almost assembled and its influence over half of Europe and half of Asia?

Quote: Single-n

What are Russia's achievements?

Well, for example, the fact that for the first time in eighty years our country is not losing, but expanding its territory.

[single-n]

But didn't the war start because someone there didn't recognize the Bolshevik regime? Don't beat around the bush.
The USSR collapsed after 73 years. What will happen to the Russian Federation in 73 years?
Thirty-five years later, the USSR went from being a pariah and a piece of territory to becoming a global superpower. What's on the Russian Federation's balance sheet?
Who recognized what of what Russia annexed? The USSR's territorial acquisitions, including the Kuril Islands. The entire world recognized them. As did how we carved up other countries' territories.
And list what the USSR squandered? Was the Comecon bloc worth Finland? No?
So, both the Finns and the Poles were part of the Russian Empire to some extent. There was semi-autonomy there.

[nik-mazur]

Quote: Single-n

But didn't the war start because someone there didn't recognize the power of the Bolsheviks?

That's exactly what I said.

Quote: Single-n

What will happen to Russia in 73 years?

Patience is the best way to know the future. Although, if you're really impatient, you can try reading coffee grounds.

Quote: Single-n

Thirty-five years later, the USSR went from being a pariah country and a piece of territory to becoming a global superpower.

Yes, having lost up to 10 million in the Civil War, up to 6 million during the famine of 1921-22, up to 8 million during the famine of 1932-33, up to 27 million in the Great Patriotic War and up to 1,5 million during the famine of 1946-47.

Quote: Single-n

What's on the balance sheet of the Russian Federation?

Well, at least that, unlike the USSR, Russia is alive. And being alive is better than being dead.

Quote: Single-n

Why did you fall in love with the USSR?

At the time of its creation, Finland, Poland, the Baltics, Bessarabia, and parts of Transcaucasia were lost. If we speak only of Russia, it forever lost the territories of Ukraine and Belarus, as well as Kyrgyzstan and part of Kazakhstan, which had been part of Russia and only became republics in 1936.
During the collapse of the USSR, it lost absolutely everything. Because even Russia is not the USSR.

Quote: Single-n

So, both the Finns and the Poles were part of the Russian Empire to the extent that

Yeah, they were part of the Empire as an autonomous region. And now they're part of NATO, along with the Balts.

[single-n]

And how much has Russia lost, despite there being no major wars? What's happening now is a mere slap on the wrist compared to the interventions of 1918-1921.
From 1992 to 2021, 7502022 people entered the country for permanent residence.
in 1991 it was 148 million, in 2024 it was 146 million.
If only the flight and expulsion of Russians and Russian-speakers were the cause. And they were the ones who immigrated first. Then Russia's losses would be around 8 million, WITHOUT wars, famine, or blockades. No big deal. Some survived two massive invasions and still managed to gain half of Europe. And others quietly rotted and plundered. And now they've been unable to retake two regions for four years.
And don't talk about the Baltics and NATO today. Under the USSR, the Finns sat like mice under a broom. The Baltics were part of the USSR. They only ended up there AFTER the collapse. The Finns are doing this thanks to the red lines and concerns of the great geostrategist, who, in truth, is constantly being deceived.

[nik-mazur]

Quote: Single-n

Russia's losses are about 8 million, WITHOUT wars, famines, and blockades.

Well, yes, it was just a superpower that collapsed. No wars, no blockades, and no famine. Out of greatness and prosperity, apparently.
The fact that post-Soviet Russia has managed to avoid wars and famines is akin to a miracle. I understand that many are still upset by how things turned out.

Quote: Single-n

received half of Europe

And where is this half of Europe now? And what did we gain from having this half of Europe?

Quote: Single-n

The Balts were part of the USSR.

Since 1940. At the time of the creation of the USSR, the Baltic states were not part of it.

[single-n]

Stop trying to pin the geoid on a bird. Why are you all writing about events happening 70 years from now?
Let's look at what the USSR was and what it achieved 35 years later, and what the Russian Federation has achieved.
1917 + 35 = 1953. The USSR is a superpower, controlling half of Europe and allied with China and part of Korea. Of all the lands of the Russian Empire, only Finland was not returned to Russian control, although some of its territory was taken from it. Finland declared itself a neutral country and did not allow its territory to be used by foreign armies. It also did not join any military blocs. Sakhalin and the Kuril Islands, lost to the Tsar, were also returned. All lands annexed by the USSR, except the Kuril Islands, are officially recognized by the entire world as an integral part of the USSR.
The USSR carried out an agricultural revolution and industrialization. It educated tens of millions of illiterate citizens. It repelled two major invasions of its territory. It acquired the most advanced weapon of the time—nuclear weapons. This allowed it to guarantee its defense against future invasions. It was one of the founders of the UN, where it gained veto power, thus gaining a powerful diplomatic instrument.
Start listing what the Russian Federation has "achieved" in 35 years.

[nik-mazur]

Quote: Single-n

Let's look at what the USSR has achieved and what it has achieved in 35 years.

By 1952, the USSR had lost the First World War, won the Great Patriotic War, lost more than 50 million people due to wars and famine, created 35 atomic bombs, and by some economic indicators had reached the level of 1913, but by others had not.
And 41 years later, the USSR ceased to exist, despite its allies, control of half of Europe, and the industrial-agrarian revolution.
Your remark about the agrarian revolution was particularly funny. Incidentally, it's also unclear what good we got from all these allies and control over half (actually less than half) of Europe.

Quote: Single-n

What has Russia "achieved" in 35 years?

Russia survived the collapse of the USSR in the 1990s. It increased its GDP tenfold in 15 years. It achieved food self-sufficiency, something the USSR had never achieved during its entire existence. It rebuilt its armed forces, which remain among the strongest on the planet and allow it to stand up to the richest countries. It preserved and developed its nuclear industry into a world leader. And, as laughable as it may be for Soviet-era wankers, it eliminated the shameful phenomenon of queues, which can be considered a symbol of the Soviet era.
Moreover, it did all this without losing 50 million people from wars and famine.

[single-n]

1. The USSR could not have lost the First World War because it did not participate in it.
2

won the Great Patriotic War, lost more than 50 million people due to wars and famine,

.
Is this just for WWII, or are you including all the losses over 35 years? Well, then the Russian Federation would have died out by 8 million without wars, and we don't yet know what the war will cost us. The population has declined. The USSR, despite losses and without bringing in millions of migrants, increased its population.
3. 35 atomic bombs + an army were enough to prevent any Churchill-like people from risking a plan like "the unthinkable."
4. Is there anything to object to regarding the agricultural sector?

By the beginning of the First World War (1914), about 170 tractors were in use in Russian agriculture.

93,1 thousand – the number of tractors in the USSR in 1951

In 1914, the rural population was 86%; in 1951, 53%. The number of literate people in the villages under the tsar was 37%. In 1951, it was 98%.
This is not a revolution? What is it?
5. The queues haven't gone away. They've simply been replaced by exhausting work and debt bondage. The shortage of goods has been replaced by a shortage of money.

And don't talk about what will happen in 41 years. There's no guarantee that by the beginning of next year, a dozen regions won't be freezing in their apartments like in Belgorod. Even Mishustin has already started talking about it. Growth has practically stopped. We have to use three-year indicators to get good numbers. Let's see what the figures are for 2026, otherwise in a couple of years the lines for sugar and buckwheat will be like in the spring of 2022. :) Haven't you seen them? They're pretty good. Half a block long.

And tell me, what kind of difficulties did Russia have after 1991 that it SURVIVED!!!? Perhaps the intervention of a dozen countries? Perhaps a trade blockade? A civil war of millions, with armies pumped full of foreign weapons? Epidemics mowing down hundreds of thousands? Ah-ah-ah. I remember. There was the shelling of parliament. And the Chechen disgrace. Yeah. A terrible threat. During the civil war, this would have been dismissed as local squabbles at the district level. But the truth is, the communists back then weren't corrupt creatures. They would sell anything and everything for a buck.
The worst threat was the plunder of her own country and a fight over who could grab the most. She survived.

[nik-mazur]

Quote: Single-n

The USSR could not have lost the First World War because it did not participate in it.

Yes, Soviet Russia formally participated in the First World War from November 1917 to February 1918. But you're not that formalistic. Or are you?

Quote: Single-n

IN GENERAL, you take all the losses for 35 years

Yes, in 35 years, as you suggested.

Quote: Single-n

The Russian Federation has become 8 million extinct without wars.

Well, yes, under the rubble of the USSR, destroyed by Soviet leaders, for which they deserve a big human thank you with a note in the chest.

Quote: Single-n

There's something to be said for the agricultural sector... 93,1 thousand—the number of tractors in the USSR in 1951

Unfortunately, the number of tractors doesn't correlate with the amount of food. It's enough to remember that the USSR purchased grain from its bitter ideological enemies, the United States, while in Russia (both pre-revolutionary and modern), grain is an export commodity. Or compare grocery store shelves in Tsarist and modern Russia with those of the Soviet Union. Just don't tell me fairy tales about natural sausage and the most delicious ice cream (the recipe for which, by the way, Mikoyan brought from America).

Quote: Single-n

The lines haven't gone away. They've simply been replaced by exhausting work and debt bondage.

Yeah, we used to work pretty hard, too. Sometimes we'd work two jobs, and on weekends, we'd be hilling potatoes upside down at the dacha.
There was no debt bondage due to the lack of a proper credit system. Some might have been willing to accept debt bondage to move from a barracks or a small apartment into a decent (by Soviet standards, naturally) apartment, but such an opportunity was not available.
By the way, now no one is forcing you to take out loans.

Quote: Single-n

The shortage of goods was replaced by a shortage of money

Well, at least you acknowledge the shortage of goods.

Quote: Single-n

There's no need to talk about what will happen in 41 years.

I agree. No need to invent horror stories about what will happen in 2067.

Quote: Single-n

Otherwise, in a couple of years, the lines for sugar and buckwheat will be like in the spring of 2022.

And how are they, are they still standing or have they come to their senses and calmed down in a couple of weeks?

Quote: Single-n

What difficulties did the Russian Federation have after 1991 that it SURVIVED!!!

In fact, only the common house was destroyed, but otherwise there were no problems.

Quote: Single-n

She survived

You can beat your head against the wall as much as you like, but yes, Russia is alive, and the USSR is dead.

[your1970]

Quote: Single-n

Soviet tanks could easily have reached the English Channel. Fortunately, the channel is only 800 km from Berlin.

They could, in theory. Probably...
The only problem is that no one in the USSR thought about what would happen next???
It's about the same as in Blitzkrieg - "get to line A-A" and that's it...
Hitler at least had some kind of political program for THEN: "Cut out the Russians, give the Germans land, make peace with England..."
What did the USSR plan for the day after the tanks arrived at the English Channel? Nothing...

Quote: Single-n

And if no one was afraid of the USSR, then give examples of bombings of cities in the USSR.

Remind me which country the U-2 flew through, and in the capital of which country did Tsesna land on the Main Square?
Which country's borders were regularly violated by NATO aircraft?
Whose ships had to be pushed out en masse?
Whose Dry River was it?

Quote: Single-n

Were you yapping about reparations?

In theory, they could talk about reparations. speak only countries that were UNDER THE USSR.

Quote: Single-n

Did the USSR merchant fleet ships have to hide?

Tuapse? 16 trawlers in Argentina? Ghana? A little earlier, Japan.

Quote: Single-n

Maybe someone there took the risk of seizing the USSR's assets?

- Hmm, the USSR itself was quite adept at throwing other powers around - yes, there's nothing to say about that...
However, in the end they squeezed it out ALL USSR, including mice and cockroaches

[single-n]

And then we could have sat with the US for another 100 years, on different continents, playing dirty tricks on each other. No one would have repeated "Overlord" there. The purpose of access to the Strait was to prevent the US from transferring forces to Europe... In that case, England would have either been taken immediately or completely burned out. That's all.
The fact that the USSR collapsed is one thing. You still haven't answered. Is it better NOW? "After the missile strikes, parts of Belgorod won't have hot water until mid-spring."
The damage to critical energy infrastructure in Belgorod caused by the latest missile strike by the Ukrainian Armed Forces was "very extensive and very serious," Governor Vyacheslav Gladkov stated following a meeting of the regional task force. The damage has not yet been fully repaired, so those Belgorod homes connected to the centralized heating system will not have hot water until the end of the heating season.
What were you writing about a couple of steamships? There's a town here that's half a million meters deep freezing because of the shelling.
And the U-2 eventually flew to its destination. Are you not aware?

[your1970]

Quote: Single-n

No one would have repeated "Overlord" there. The purpose of access to the strait was to prevent the US from transferring forces to Europe. That's all.

Besides Overlord, there was also a landing in Italy - the other end of Europe.
So would we have run around Europe for the US, losing tracks along the way?

Quote: Single-n

In this case, England would either be taken immediately or completely burned out. That's all.

So if they burned it down, why send tanks there? To drive around in the ashes?
It's either one or the other - both are completely meaningless.
And yes, you forgot that the USA could do the same - burn it out...

Quote: Single-n

Here the town of half a million is freezing due to shelling.

- proxy war. Everyone does it – we in Vietnam, the US in Afghanistan, the EU in Ukraine.
The EU is doing well at the moment - they have organized a war alongside a global enemy.

[single-n]

1. Italy had its own grouping. The CMEA bloc is not its pathetic remnant, the Russian Federation.
2. Can you read? I was writing about England.
3. The US couldn't burn down all of Eurasia, and its main strike force—air force—was deprived of forward bases in Europe. So, if the US had burned down Britain, the USSR would have lost nothing.
4. Show me a proxy war against the USSR, after 1945, where their cities were bombed for years. They chickened out against the "upper volta with missiles." But they've been quietly fighting for four years against a stub with a supreme power that has no analogues in the world.

[nik-mazur]

Quote: Cap.Nemo58rus

Just remember "Mr. No"

Gromyko earned the nickname "Mr. No" when he was the USSR's representative to the UN and actively used his veto power. (By the way, what did he say "no" to when no one dared even utter a word of opposition?)
And as Foreign Minister, Gromyko said, "Better ten years of negotiations than one day of war." Now, the local, alas, patriots would condemn him to filth for such a thing.

[Cap.nemo58rus]

Absolutely right. I used my veto power 20 times.

[bondov]

Now, despite all the help from the West

help actually
It has weakened considerably, but this is also a result of Russia's actions. It must be acknowledged that Putin is acting cautiously, trying to prevent a major war. Even before the Second World War, Putin repeatedly tried to resolve everything through negotiations...
the demands were reasonable and very moderate - the neutrality of Ukraine and its federalization

[man]

Quote from S.S.R.

In 2008, Russia was not ready, but it did it, at the minimum.
Not ready in 2014, but did it at minimum.
2022 is not ready, we delayed but decided to do it.

Sorry for interrupting your conversation, I couldn't resist...
Here you write yourself: not ready... not ready... not ready... Just like in the Soviet "Crew" with the instruments during takeoff, the refrain is "Not ready for takeoff"... "Not ready for takeoff"... So maybe they should have prepared better first, damn it?!

[SSR]

Quote: mann

So maybe I should have prepared better first, damn it?!

Prepare for what?
1. Communications were resolved as best they could. Everyone was talking about satellites back then, like blowing up a bucket of nails and there were no satellites. The beta version of Starlink launched in 2020, but it took 10 years to get there.
2. UAVs like Predators, Bayraktars, and our response was being prepared like Orions, etc.
Where are all these UAVs in the trash?
3. Karabakh, kamikaze drones, well, we started producing them too, but who was thinking about FPV drones at that time - and then also fiber-optic ones?
4. Some people keep saying, "Tank biathlon, tank biathlon!" And when, at first, one of our tanks defeated three others, everyone applauded, "Oh, what good guys!"
The skill appeared out of nowhere?
And there are plenty of such moments, but there are "episodes" of non-targeted spending on the ground, when soldiers buy their own fuel, and they keep quiet about it, but they shout at the top of their lungs: "Biathlon! Red lines! Starlink!"
No one except the United States has such a low-orbit satellite constellation; even China, which is better at electronics, doesn’t have anything similar yet.
Now another one will start whining - oh, where is our electronics?!!!

Simply saying A means saying B. Many loudmouths didn't know anything about Starlink, since the internet is generally very accessible throughout our country.

[man]

Well, you were clearly a bit hasty with the drones. You should have been thinking about them back in April 2016. Incidentally, they were discussed at the Military Forum back then... It's a shame our Ministry of Defense didn't read it...

[nik-mazur]

Quote: mann

with drones... We should have been thinking about them back in April 2016... By the way, they were discussing it at VO back then

Talking is like carrying sacks. No one at the Military Academy in 2016 even considered using drones, especially FPVEs, in this way and on such a scale.

[man]

No one in the VO in 2016 even thought about using drones, especially FPVEs, in this way and on such a scale.
How come no one thought of it when I read that Azerbaijan's main success was linked to the use of drones? I wasn't even registered back then...
Chatting is not like carrying bags
And be polite, I can throw shit too.

[nik-mazur]

Quote: mann

Azerbaijan's main success was linked precisely to the use of drones

With the use of Bayraktars, which were used as ersatz aircraft. In fact, this was precisely the inspiration behind Ukraine's purchase of these miracle Bayraktars. But it turned out that under normal air defense conditions, tactical aircraft drones don't work at all. And this was in 2020—in 2016, no one could discuss this.
Nobody even thought about FPV drones back then – at worst, they discussed using them as tactical reconnaissance drones.
Incidentally, there is an opinion that Azerbaijan's success was ensured by its mountain units, which had been trained and prepared specifically for this operation for several years.

Quote: mann

And be polite, I can throw shit too.

Are you so offended for those who discussed drones in 2016?

[man]

Quote from: nik-mazur

With the use of Bayraktars, which were used as ersatz aircraft. In fact, this was precisely the inspiration behind Ukraine's purchase of Bayraktars. But it turned out that under normal air defense conditions, tactical aircraft drones are completely useless. And this was in 2020; in 2016, no one could discuss this.

What do Bayraktars have to do with this? In 2016, there were Israeli drones!

[nik-mazur]

Quote: mann

What does Bayraktar have to do with this?

Do I know? You cited the example of Azerbaijan in Karabakh. And there were the Bayraktars.

Quote: mann

In 2016 there were Israeli drones

First, where were they? In a four-day war that ended in nothing? And second, what kind? Certainly not FPV drones, but the same kind of aircraft that many countries began to produce, imitating the US but unable to produce Reapers and Global Hawks.

[Il'nur]

not ready... not ready... not ready...

The question that needs to be asked here is: Why wasn't she ready, not in 2008, not in 2014, and especially not in 2022... Why couldn't she have prepared during her 22 years of presidency? What was stopping her?

[Fast_mutant]

Quote from S.S.R.

In 2008, Russia was not ready, but it did it, at the minimum.
Not ready in 2014, but done at minimum.
2022 is not ready, we delayed but decided to do it.

Or maybe I should have prepared for all these 14 years, instead of playing "biathlons"?

[Fast_mutant]

Always the same thing... 2008 - "no connection", 2014 - "no connection", 2022 - "no connection"... 2026 - "no connection, Starlink closed, Telegram closed".
When will the military finally get OUR OWN communications channels? Fast and secure... But how will they, if we've barely managed our 14 launches? It's time we started thinking about trampolines. But how they laughed at Elon. He worked, took his lumps, but never stopped gaining experience (and it didn't matter whose money it was). As a result, we use his systems. And we also use Telegram on the front lines. And we still sew Baofengs... But in our "fat years," we played tank shooters in Alabino instead of providing the army with our own communications systems!

[your1970]

Quote: Fast_mutant

Always the same thing... 2008 - "no connection", 2014 - "no connection", 2022 - "no connection"... 2026 - "no connection, Starlink closed, Telegram closed".
When will the military finally get OUR OWN communications channels? Fast and secure... But how will they, if we've barely managed our 14 launches? It's time we started thinking about trampolines. But how they laughed at Elon. He worked, took his lumps, but never stopped gaining experience (and it didn't matter whose money it was). As a result, we use his systems. And we also use Telegram on the front lines. And we still sew Baofengs... But in our "fat years," we played tank shooters in Alabino instead of providing the army with our own communications systems!

There was such mighty The SA beat off edgings, straightened snowdrifts and blankets with a thread, sewed tags on everything in sight ("a soldier without a tag is like a cap without a hole"), dug potatoes, sent virgin land battalions, dug from here until lunchtime...
And a bunch of other "shootings"
As for communications equipment, I had a TA-57, which was formerly a TAI-43...
It could be used to torture enemies, as a weapon, to hammer nails - but as a means of communication it was... a by-product it was...
Instead of providing the army with communications equipment during the "fat years" of the USSR, the army played games of "cigarette butt burial," tags, and similar nonsense...

[nerovnayadoroga]

You don't know anything about Svyaz, and that's encouraging...

[Igor K_2]

Exactly. Even in its final years, the USSR was on par with the West in terms of defense electronics development.

[your1970]

Quote: nerovnayadoroga

You don't know anything about Svyaz, and that's encouraging...

Quote: Igor K_2

Exactly. Even in its final years, the USSR was on par with the West in terms of defense electronics development.

Quote: Cap.Nemo58rus

Besides cantik and TA, do you know anything about the army? 🤔 Did you even serve, and when and where?

Conscription 1988-90 in the Engineering settlement and in Kushka. Artillery regiment, control battery and artillery reconnaissance.
Telephones were TAI-43 everywhere in the regiment.
At the communications center there was a switchboard, I don’t remember the brand, it was made in 1942, I think it had 28 subscribers, the call sign of the center was either “Hercaliy” or “Fan”.
The radio stations were as old as mammoths - there were no workers - so I don’t even remember the brands.
After the withdrawal from Afghanistan, we got the dead in aluminum boxes. When UN observers arrived, our communications specialists dragged them up to the hill to report to headquarters, shouting so loudly that they could be heard at headquarters even without radios. Meanwhile, the UN troops below the hill were freely communicating with their base at the Intourist hotel via Motorola radios.
No, maybe somewhere in SA there were normal ones for that time, there were means of communication - but in the Privo and KturKVO there were none

[Cap.nemo58rus]

Besides cantik and TA, do you know anything about the army? 🤔 Did you even serve, and when and where?

[alexoff]

In general, a lot of money was allocated for military communications. But where it all went? You'd have to ask Shoigu.

[Ban Zai]

Over 25 years, the estimated value of resources sold from oil and gas alone is 3 trillion dollars, the USSR can’t even hold a candle to it, the country could have been rebuilt 4 times

[alexoff]

Well, you're also going to tell me that biathlon shouldn't have been held in August 2022.

[Fast_mutant]

Well then, let's continue with the event. Why not?

[man]

Quote: Fast_mutant

Quote from S.S.R.

In 2008, Russia was not ready, but it did it, at the minimum.
Not ready in 2014, but done at minimum.
2022 is not ready, we delayed but decided to do it.

Or maybe I should have prepared for all these 14 years, instead of playing "biathlons"?

So am I about it I'll just add: and even earlier

[mongolian9999]

In 2008, they marched on Tbilisi but didn't make it. In 2014, Donbas and Luhansk begged to join us, just like Crimea, but we didn't take it. Now we're taking lives. In 2022, they came close to Kyiv but started getting deceived by negotiators. It's you who should abandon your mantras. A toothless and cowardly policy. Has the Supreme Command ever mentioned capitulation? UkrainiansNo. It's all just a deal. They've rewritten the Constitution over and over, but they haven't bothered to include a line about a state ideology based on family values ​​(and whatever other values ​​are articulated daily). Because someone (let's put it this way) doesn't need it.

[ser-pov]

What do mantras have to do with it?... Just the facts.

[Huarabey]

The Tsipsari need to throw in some money and shake up the regime, so these poor guys are straining with all their might.

[seamen2]

*Now, despite all the help from the West, Russia is holding on and gaining momentum in its defense industry.
The toothless one was making a noise, wasn't it?*

So, the saying comes to mind: what can a herd of lions led by a ram achieve?
This is exactly what Strelkov was talking about.
True, Romans prefer to hear only what Putin pours into their ears.
p/s/ *and it seems to be about chocolate, but if you smell it, then no*

[alex-defensor]

"The Language of Power": The Danish Prime Minister Demanded Strikes Deep into Russia

I wonder if this monkey (in the biological sense of the word) is ready to bravely launch these attacks directly from Danish territory?
Or should the residents of the former Ukraine once again pay for their "heroism" and "belligerence"?

[Wladyslaw]

They'll lay bricks if Oslo goes down. But that's unlikely. The bourgeoisie is in power, and they have partners, children, mistresses, and money.

[sub307]

Quote: ser-pov

It's all due to the toothlessness of our politics. Thanks to the red-tipped pen for that.

Of course..., because where are the strikes on the "decision-making centers" "announced" in '22? Personally, I associate "decision-making centers" with... well, at the very least, the complex of government buildings and structures in Kyiv on Bankovskaya Street... at the very least, and so on..., geographically, and not at all strongholds, fortifications on the left bank of the border, and not even the GUR building, which was "covered" once, a long time ago. Now, in the fourth year (!), energy and industrial facilities have finally begun to be "taken out" more or less seriously. Well, in all other respects, in terms of achieving the goals, again announced at the beginning of the SVO... - !alas and ah...", for now... The place of long-suffering Donetsk and Luhansk has already been "firmly taken" by Belgorod, and many other regions are under constant fire...

[Pavel_Sveshnikov]

Yeah, right. By eliminating the top brass, we could have quickly ended the war and saved hundreds of thousands of our soldiers, and even those of others. But unfortunately, our head of state isn't Stalin, but a lawyer by training. He's got his own legal quirks. I'll tell you a joke about lawyers: Where two lawyers meet, there are three opinions.

[nik-mazur]

Quote: Pavel_Sveshnikov

By destroying the top brass, we would have quickly ended the war... unfortunately, Stalin is not our head of state.

Do you remember when Stalin quickly ended the war by destroying the top brass?
I remember that under Stalin, about 180 soldiers were lost in three and a half months in one war, and twenty million in four years in another. Somehow, what the hell, such achievements.

[ruha ruhov]

I wonder what she would say if one of our deputies, for example, also answered her in the same tone - we need to strike deep into Denmark, so that the prime minister shuts up.

[private person]

I wonder what she would say if one of our deputies, for example, also answered her in the same tone - we need to strike deep into Denmark.

What will they answer for? And what about us?

[nerovnayadoroga]

Don't worry, the smell of nuts will sober anyone up, even drug addicts, but the concentrations are still minimal.

[Mikhail Ivanov]

I agree about the felt-tip pen!
As for Greenland's "owners," there's nothing surprising about their behavior. They have to somehow get off the topic in front of the electorate...
I've written many times before – we need to stop publishing the speeches of these pathetic people! We don't respect ourselves when we quote them...

[Mikhail Ivanov]

I agree about the felt-tip pen!
As for Greenland's "owners," there's nothing surprising about their behavior. They have to somehow get off the topic in front of the electorate...
I've written many times before – we need to stop publishing the speeches of these pathetic people! We don't respect ourselves when we quote them...

[ZovSailor]

Andrey K
Today, 19: 40
How does the prime minister speak the "language" of Donny's single name?
She probably practiced her "language of power" using Greenland as an example.

Apparently, this European corrupt official, together with her family's homosexual company, has a solid financial profit from supplying weapons to Bandera.
Besides, she has poor hearing if she doesn’t remember the words of the Kremlin in 2025. - There are countries in Europe that are smaller in size than thousands of Russian cities, but with a high population density.
And after the application of the new military doctrine of the Russian Federation, Russia will have no one to negotiate with in Europe.

[Kotofeich]

"The air temperature in Kyiv is below 25 degrees below zero."
Ah, why was the temperature so high? You should have said below 50 right away.

[Appraiser]

Well, let him try... It's no use talking, let's see what's left of Denmark.

[faterdom]

Red will take Greenland, but not Eric.
But that won't cure stupidity. Kaya even reads a book, but there's no result.

[Fedor Sokolov]

"Look, Kaya even reads a book, but there's no result." And for her, the main thing is the process of appearing smart, not the result.

[Andrey K]

Frederiksen cites the West's restrictions on the use of long-range weapons as the main obstacle to forcing Russia to peace.

I am also confused about the restrictions on attacks on decision-making centers.
If there had been a perceived threat of some kind of attack on the presumptuous Denmark, the Prime Minister would have known exactly where to stick her tongue with force.

[private person]

I am also confused about the restrictions on attacks on decision-making centers.

Where are these centers in London or Brussels? There's no one in these centers in the country itself; they travel around the world.

[Zoldat_A]

Quote: faterdom

Von Kaya even reads a book, but there is no result.

She was given a self-instruction manual for the Armenian language, written in Uzbek.
She makes an honest attempt to read it in Estonian.
That's why the result is not very good.
When no one hears, he curses in Russian because of it...

[16112014nk]

Women, by nature, should generally moderate male aggression, but European men actually fuel it. Something's wrong in the Danish state.

[ser-pov]

Is it just Danish? I think it's true for everything European.

[private person]

Women, by their nature, should actually suppress men's aggression.

It is normal women who suppress aggression, but in Europe it is feminists and lesbians.

[Junior Private]

Clearly begging for Oreshnik. But we won't just hand over Greenland to the Americans. We'll haggle some more. Denmark, Denmark, Denmark—something familiar. What is it?

[Montezuma]

Quote: Junior Private

Denmark, Denmark, Denmark - a familiar word. What is it?

This is the country where the famous prince asked, "To be or not to be, that is the question..." He probably foresaw the future problem of Greenland, with whom it would be.

[Pavel_Sveshnikov]

Or maybe he thought about whether such a country would exist or not after a nuclear war?

[nordscout]

When the Lord God wants to punish a person, he, as a rule, deprives him of reason, which we are now seeing in the ruling elite of Europe...

[geologist]

And with a light shake of her hand she moved the regiments towards the Russians.

[Sergey Kirakosyan]

We can't defeat them with shelves. Ikea has already retreated!
I answer...!!!)))

[Montezuma]

Quote: geologist

And with a light shake of her hand she moved the regiments towards the Russians.

Suddenly, with a weak wave of his hand... in the original.

[geologist]

Yes... it's the same old "Poltava" and Eklund's vacuum theory in his study of that war, when empires take everything superfluous from weak, small ones. Incidentally, Denmark was our ally in that Northern War, and today they're taking Greenland from them, and they're not on our side.

[paul3390]

So I take it the Danes also have excess electricity and heating? Have they decided to join the Tsegabonese?

[Commissar77]

Quote: paul3390

So I take it the Danes also have excess electricity and heating? Have they decided to join the Tsegabonese?

Belgorod residents don't have electricity, but the Danes do. It's a mess.

[Odu1]

We need to demand that strikes be carried out deep into Denmark. Small fry.

[Ball]

Did this brainless woman even understand what she said?

[kind]

She's a masochist. She said it to get a response and "enjoy" the "Hazel" kernels.

[kind]

This mongrel is smaller than any of the Baltic dragons.

[invisible_man]

Damn, you found a map. Amazing!

[Limrak]

------------------------------------------------------------

[Sansan]

The smaller the fly, the more viciously it bites. Why are you swinging your arms like you're holding hazelnuts? The more powerful the weapon, the more wisdom it requires. All you can do is puff out your cheeks if you can't offer anything sensible.

[Hiller]

Someone must answer for their words. Specifically, this insane person. So that the rudiments of a brain don't give commands to that vile tongue.

[private person]

Someone must answer for their words. Specifically, this distraught individual.

It is necessary to answer, but who will ask for an answer?

[Hiller]

Specific officials vested with the appropriate powers!!!

[snow mountain]

When will Trump take Greenland away from them?

[Fisher]

I can understand where they get such anger, it's almost like drooling. But the fact that this miracle isn't afraid of anything is clearly our fault. We have organizations, can't they really cause trouble for our "esteemed partners?" And we need to hit Ukraine so hard that they'll get it, and they'll bark so loudly they'll be utterly obliterated.

[bbss]

This is their eternal fear of Russia speaking.

[rocket757]

So the gay Europeans haven't just gone crazy, they're afraid... and for good reason, though.

[Reptiloid]

This Frederickson has been hysterical for years now because of her Russophobia.

[rocket757]

To hell with them all... later, all later, we'll give each sister a pair of earrings, what they deserve...

[Reptiloid]

We often discuss this with you. It's not worth it, the idiot. She's just getting angrier and angrier.

[rocket757]

They're just a dummy, but they stink a lot... and their sycophants are so offensive.

[Reptiloid]

Apparently, these hangers-on got jobs only recently. They probably didn't know how or what they were taking—some kind of sensitive hormones, like many there—to keep their stubble from growing. That's what it turns out

[geologist]

I may not live in the middle of nowhere, but a couple of explosions just reached my ear.

[LeutnantTom]

Mette? There's Mette in Norway!
Wasn't there something about the pedophile Epstein?
Mette Frederiksen
During the war against Yugoslavia, NATO deliberately bombed the country's energy supplies and in official statements called it a legitimate war.

During the Yugoslav Wars, the infamous NATO press conference took place on May 25, 1999.
At a press conference, NATO spokesman Jamie Shea was asked why NATO was bombing power plants, transformers, and water pipelines in Yugoslavia, why hospitals were experiencing power outages, and why NATO was effectively holding "civilians hostage."

His answer

"In this discussion, we mustn't lose sight of the bigger picture. President Milosevic has numerous emergency generators at his disposal. His armed forces have hundreds of them. He can use these generators to power either his hospitals and schools, or his army. That's his decision. If this is a serious concern to him, that's exactly what we wish for him, and I won't apologize for it."

The question is, why is Denmark so obsessed with the “Russian threat”?
Regarding Ukraine, the rationality of Denmark's position must be increasingly questioned, especially given that the Danish state budget lacks funds for its own rearmament. When current "Prime Minister" Mette Frederiksen declares that "the most important goal is to defeat Russia militarily," she seems to forget that Copenhagen itself advocated that the opinions of the populations of border regions be given due consideration when determining borders between states (as in the case of Southern Jutland and Southern Schleswig in 1920). In the Ukrainian conflict, Denmark (like Germany) clearly forgets the positive and constructive experience it has gained in resolving territorial and national conflicts (the Copenhagen and Bonn Declarations of March 29, 1955, which regulated the rights of the German minority in Denmark and the Danish minority in Germany). Has the principle that belonging to a particular culture and nationality is a matter of free choice and cannot be revised or questioned by governments been completely forgotten?

Although Copenhagen denied any Russian or Chinese ships in the region, rhetoric soon followed, echoing the American position. For example, Major General Søren Andersen, head of the Danish Arctic Command in Greenland, told Reuters in mid-January that the Danish military was focused on defending against potential Russian activity, not against US activity.

In Denmark, the assessment of the reality of the threat posed by Russia is often ambiguous. For example, Thomas Arenkiel, the head of military intelligence, stated in October 2025 that a full-scale military aggression from Moscow is extremely unlikely, but Russia's task is to convince Copenhagen that this danger constantly hangs over the small northern European country strategically located at the entrance to the Baltic Sea. For the Danish leadership, as for other European countries, the line between peace and war is blurred, and they believe they must act in a protracted, multifaceted crisis. This explains the rigidity and intransigence of the Danish position.

Danish Prime Minister Anders Fogh Rasmussen's August 29, 2003, speech condemning the policy of collaboration during World War II launched an attempt at "moral cleansing" of Danish foreign policy and fueled deep-seated fears in elite circles of being on the wrong side of history.

The point is that Denmark is on the wrong side again!

Then, as now, Denmark is on the Nazi side! Then, as now, Danish "politicians" are fools!

[Junior Private]

Why is everyone pestering this woman? Maybe she's the new Kakalas. I'll be honest – I miss Psaki.

[opuonmed]

According to the Danish Prime Minister, in order to win the war with Russia, the Ukrainian Armed Forces must be allowed to strike deep into Russian territory.

Let's see what Putin will do with those who shout and threaten the Russian Federation and provide weapons that kill Russian citizens, and draw conclusions!

[Zheka111]

She gestures just like Adolf, he's probably her idol, or maybe she has relatives from the 3rd Reich...
The survivors were inspired by Russia's humane war in Ukraine and think that Russia is weak.

[horror]

As I understand it, after such statements, our Ministry of Foreign Affairs will summon the Danish ambassador and hand him a note, up to and including the severance of diplomatic relations.

[Ture-Dog]

By all accounts, it's high time, and not only with Denmark, but for this you need to have principles and balls, and some people don't have them.

[Ture-Dog]

Yeah, right, it's Russia that's going to annex Greenland.
Flying over the madhouse's nest...

[Sobol]

What aggressive women they have. And what if the Russian leadership decides to strike deep into Denmark? Oh yeah, Denmark doesn't have any depth.

[Reptiloid]

Quote: SoboL

What aggressive women they have...

Men paint their nails and take hormones. That's how they get these unprocessed women ----

[Sebenza]

Not bad, I'd fuck her. For her values.

[cat Crush]

What, straight INTO THE DEEP? Good luck.

[Sebenza]

And isn't this one attractive? It's hard to please the tastes of the commentators on VO.

[nerovnayadoroga]

What, did you find yours in the trash!? 🤣

[Andrey Andreev_2]

Greenland should be taken away from Denmark for such words))

[Foaly]

The systemic problem of highly developed societies is that, while offering numerous opportunities for advancement in prestigious fields (business, science, art), they deplete the human resource for the most important one – governing that very society, that is, politics. Politics is where the most stupid people enter. Examples abound. And Smittja Frederiksen is one such example.
Over the past four years, it's become clear that it's not Russia that's raising the bar in the standoff. And the energy strikes at -25°C didn't just happen out of nowhere. If Russia had started with this in 22, it would probably have been more difficult to negotiate with China, India, and the Arab countries, and import goods through Kazakhstan and Armenia. But now everyone understands. Except for that thick-headed Smith.

[gmss]

Meanwhile, the Danish company Rockwool donated a considerable sum to the needs of the SVO. I'm sure no one even knew about this Fredericksen before; everyone will forget about him tomorrow after this groan.

[Evgenijus]

Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen demanded long-range strikes deep into Russian territory.

Why hasn't this prime minister been arrested yet, even in absentia? There's evidence of her criminal intent. Where's Bastyrkin?

[Misza1963]

Zauważalne jest, że im mniejsze i mniej znaczące państwo, tym bardziej wojownicze. Te pribaltyki, danie, polski i Holandie stałe domagają się eskalacji.
Może trzeba im dać okazję do spróbowania.
Wyobraźmy sobie, że Rosja zostaje rzeczywiście głęboko i bolesnie uderzona, przez co rozumiem straty materialne, zniszczenie ważnych elementów, zwłaszcza wojskowych i straty ludzkie, cywilne.
Co będzie reakcja?
Czy znowu będzie to poważne ostrzeżenie i groźna miną lub ironia p. Zacharowej?
Czy Rosja w ogóle ma jakiś plan na taki wypadek?
Czy istnieje przemyślana koncepcja odwetu?
Nie wiem, jak to jest, nie znam się.
Lecz Rosja stanowczo nie jest stanowcza. Wszak każdy taki idiotyczny premier płci dowolnej gdy nie zostanie odpowiednio potraktowany, będzie nadal mówił, co chce i jak chce. A słowa wbrew pozorom znaczą i zostają w pamięci.
Czemuż w obliczu i tak beznadziejnej sytuacji z europejskimi krajami, nie zlikwidować ich ambasad? Nie zająć majątku? Nie potraktować tak, jak Polacy Rosjan?
Nie bawić się na morzu w jakieś usuwanie i oddawać im inicjatywę.
Szczerze mówiąc coraz mniej rozumiem te politykę i coraz bardziej jestem tym zasmucony.
To się może źle skończyć.
Bandytów trzeba karać szybko i bezwzględnie. Żydzi robią to w ten sposób i nikt nie próbuje ich strofować.
Czego Wy oczekujecie?
Że UE powróci do jakiejś współpracy?
Nigdy.
Za to rozbicie UE może być zbawienne. Również dla Was.
Dać oo mordzie takiej suce, w taki lub inny sposób, a na pewno ma ona wstydliwe karty w swym życiu, to już coś by było. Macie możliwości i środki. To nie przemoc. To zwykły sposób działania w obliczu niebezpieczeństwa. A pieniądze mogą wiele i Wy macie ich trochę.
Nie tylko rakiety.
Prasa zachodnia jest jak kapitalizm - za pieniądze sprzeda się i swoich obywateli.
Podrzucić jej kąsek i będzie już dalej sama obgryzać.
Nie wiem, co się u Was iz Wami dzieje, ale pamiętam dawne czasy i Wasze sukcesy.
Mimo wszystko mam nadzieję.

[K-50]

"The Language of Power": The Danish Prime Minister Demanded Strikes Deep into Russia

You will demand something from your husband.
Russia might even punch you in the face for this in return.

[Maximum.1]

Ma di cosa parla questa povera scema che non ha il coraggio di proteggere il suo territorio dalle pretese di Trump? Anzi, di nascosto ha già ceduto la Groenlandia alle pretese di Trump. E poi parla di una improbabile invasione Russa!!!Povera scema.

[Mikhail Nasharashev]

She's stupid, she's just jabbering away without even realizing it. The trend has been changing for a long time now. She should really stick her tongue somewhere and start thinking with her head.
If you keep quiet, you'll pass for smart.

[Genak]

The further we go, the clearer it becomes that the majority of prime ministers and leaders are figureheads for the Pound; they performed performances, got removed, and were not held accountable.

[Nikolay A. Shadov]

Frederiksen: Russia must be subjected to long-range strikes in order to force it to agree to the conditions proposed by Ukraine and Europe!
Tramp (lazily opening one eye): Mette, don't get distracted... Suck.
:

[SEVERIN]

This Frederiksen is more concerned about Ukraine than Greenland - one can only be amazed at the stupidity of European officials.

[nik-mazur]

Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen called for long-range strikes to be carried out in depth.

Some kind of Freudian sublimation. She needs a psychoanalyst. Or a testosterone-fueled man. Otherwise, the whole European politics has gone to... hell because of the invasion of bitchy women.

[chingachguc]

Etta Mette is either a mystery of nature or a mistake of nature. Trump is dismembering her country, and she wants to bomb Russia for it.

[chingachguc]

Kaja Kallas, Lizka Trass, Annalega Baerbock, and now another idiot. Where do they hatch from? What chicken coop?

[Aktobe]

There is left, there is right, there is up, there is down, in this case there is front.....and so on.

[Donetsk resident 2000]

It’s unpleasant to say this, but there is a grain of truth in her words (regarding Ukraine, the one about Greenland is of course nonsense).

The US and Israel always target leaders, elites, and nuclear facilities in their plans. That's what actually produces results. Yes, things aren't over with Iran yet, and things aren't easy for the peaceful ones either. But that doesn't negate the rationality of their enemies.

What about us? Communications are still working as before. The Ukrainian Armed Forces command doesn't care. I won't even mention the president; he's no big deal, and he's easily replaced if necessary. But the officers and generals. Those same ones who, on our side, rarely but surely get hit. Energy infrastructure? It's the civilians who suffer from its destruction. The ones we supposedly want to help. You know, denazification and all that. We just anger them to no avail, and it's of little use.

[nik-mazur]

Quote: Donetsk2000

The US and Israel always target leaders, elites, and nuclear facilities in their plans. This is what actually produces results.

Could you please provide some specific examples of results?

[Donetsk resident 2000]

Venezuela, Gaza Strip. Iran fought back, but was itself battered.

[nik-mazur]

Quote: Donetsk2000

Venezuela, Gaza Strip. Iran fights back

It seems like they still haven't finished in the Gaza Strip?
Iran fought back.
Betrayed by his entourage, Maduro was taken to the United States. The outcome is unclear, but OK.
You must admit, the results are not very consistent and there is no reason to rush to follow their example?

[Vasily12]

A stake up that woman's ass. That's how rulers in the past explained to the stupid that they were wrong.

[sgr291158]

And this is where we crossed the road.

[snow mountain]

Quote: horror

As I understand it, after such statements, our Ministry of Foreign Affairs will summon the Danish ambassador and hand him a note.

That's all they can do!

[roosei]

Hey, citizen Lavrov, isn't it time to express yet another deep concern in order to frighten all of NATO, along with menacing Denmark?

[Million]

She needs a good man.

[cat Crush]

What else? What, no place to put good men?

[Earl]

What else will this Freakadelkinson say? That she really did give all her weapons to the scammers and now she really only has two dog teams left to fight Trump?

[cat Crush]

In modern warfare, the quantity is not as important as the quality of weapons.

[Aktobe]

I wonder how many hazelnut seeds would be needed to sow the territory of Denmark with hazelnuts, and so that nothing else would grow there except "hazelnuts"?

[musorg]

Denmark believes the Ukrainian Armed Forces should be allowed to strike deep into Russian territory. This is precisely what's happening, and if we continue to wage war "surgically," it will happen soon—before May 2026, to be precise.

[Andriuha077]

Lavrov doesn't know anything about this?
We must definitely tell him.

Frederiksen demanded long-range strikes deep into Russian territory.

[Grossvater]

Why are they all so scary!?

[oleg_627]

All the lapdogs in the world are yapping at our country. All the former Soviet republics are getting money and yapping too. It feels like our leadership is so loyal and controlled by the West (they have kindergartens and children abroad). It's hard for the people with this rotten system.

[Shelest2000]

Danish Prime Minister Mette Frederiksen demanded long-range strikes deep into Russian territory.

Another European fighting dog. A wolfhound, yeah...
Remind me how long Denmark resisted the German army?

[AK-1945]

"The Language of Power": The Danish Prime Minister Demanded Strikes Deep into Russia

First, deal with Greenland, lady.

[pin_code]

Denmark would only need one division of any army to capitulate. And for the Prime Minister of this country, one black or Arab would be enough.

[Berg berg]

And she also asked for similar strikes to be carried out on Denmark, so that it would be fair! If you sent missiles and weapons to the Ukrainian fascist maniacs, then you are fully responsible for them!

[Alexey Alekseev_5]

Why are lesbians so mean? I get it. It's a bit short. I didn't come up with the idea that brevity is the sister of wit.

[Uma palata]

Even small cars
They are not afraid of us.

[Voenoboz]

Or maybe the Russian people should give the Russian president permission to strike deep into Europe?

[Zaurbek]

Where is "deep into 404"? Can we attack there too?